ML20154A125

Performance Indicators, Rept for Aug 1998

ML20154A125
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	08/31/1998
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20154A119	List: LIC-98-0128, Forwards Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators, Rept for Aug 1998 ML20154A125
References
NUDOCS 9810020202
Download: ML20154A125 (63)

Text

-- - _ . - _ . - - - - _ - _ - _ _

i il OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT i

FORT CALHOUN STATION 1

,t p$.w.i$W ,

. a.

,u t. sis i 'I' 3 'i*

> ;5

^,. ei,',

-[

O' - ?

./

{

^~'

, m 4 p., ' .h..

G,, i )

wc

~ .i  : -

oe11 l .

J.rpmrdglp},,"5

+. ,cm.< 4. % g

- ; -~

" ~ '

.h ~, - - - - ,

s',

ye ,,

e.

. , # g..x.

.Q .

. :- .~

U.

s

s .

I. . .y ' p ' ., ,3,'.. .-

. ??  ; + '*i'

, .N/*E.. ..' [ [ '.0~ y,.l,. --,.,,.{., , .

. . . . , . .e. . " . ' . . . .'4'c,f [ ,i.. . , . f82'. M. " ., r J d'9'<.

^'

.? .* . hl: ., .b. h:~h?g :lb, l.Nf'. .jf;,,ft ,lI~bh,'ff.) ,bAV. 'hh$(

i

. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i

J l

AUGUST 1998 SAFE OPERATIONS 2

PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE i

COST EFFECTIVENESS i .

i 98100202O2 980928 PDR q

P ADOCK 05000285 pg 5

I .

l Table of Contents / Summary I TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

em

.1 MONTHLY

SUMMARY

REPORT .. .4 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND . . .5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR , . .6 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT

SUMMARY

.7 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGFilCANT EVENTS . . . .8 l

I WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Unit Capability Factor . . . .30 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor . . .11 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS per 7000 Hours .12 High Pressure Saic5j Iniection System . .13 Auxiliary Feedwater System ,.. .. . . .14 Emergency AC Power System , . .15 Thermal Performance . .. . . . . .36 Fuel Reliability indicator . . .17 Secondary System Chemistry . . .18 Collective Radiation Exposure . . . . .19 industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate . .20 Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste . . . 21 SAFE OPERATIONS Personnel Error Rate , . .23 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate .24 I

Clean Controlled Area Contaminations

> 1,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area .25 i

1

l Table of Contents / Summary Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . . .. . . . . .. . 26 Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown ., ,

.27 Violation Trend . .. . . . . .28 COST l

Cents Per Kilowatt Hour .. . . , . . . .. ,. . 30 DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Maintenance Workload Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) .32 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance ... .33 l Procedural Noncompliance incidents . . . 34 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . .

. .35 Radiological Work Practices Program . .. . . 36 Document Review , . . . . .37 Security ine'.lents .. . . .. .38 Temporary Modifications . .. . . ... .. .39 Outstanding Modifications . .. . . .40 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . . . .41 Engineering Change Notices Status .. . .42 Open . . . . .. . .. . .43 Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . 44 Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability . . . . .45 Licensed Operator Requalification Training . . . . .46 License Candidate Exams .. . . . .47 Cycle 19 Refueling Outage MWD Planning Status .. . . . . 48 Component Testing Department. Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage 49 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 .50 Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECte Added to 1999 Refueling Outage After Freeze 51 l

2

Table of Contents / Summary I l

Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning .. . . .. .52 I ACTION PLANS. DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX Action Plans .. .. .. . .. .. .. .54 Performance Indicator Definitions . . . . 55 Safety Enhancement Program Index . . . . 60 Current Production and Operations " Records"/ Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates . 62 3

l l

FORT C'ALHOUN STATION Monthly Summary QPERATIONS During the month of August 1998, the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) operated at a nominal 100% power.

Normal plant maintenance, surveillance, and equipment rotation activities were performed during the month. The tree (3) year rolling average for the " Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams /7000 hours critical

" indicator is now zero" FCS has achieved 3 years of operation without an Automatic Scram.

WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS _

The overall WANO Performance Index was 84% during the 2nd Quarter of 1998. Significant percentage point losses are attributed to the following WANO Performance Indicators listed below:

1. The Unit Capability Factorindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 5.4 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on page 10.

2. The Unplanned Capability Loss FactorIndicatorcalculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 6.5 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on pages 10 and 11.

3. The Thermal Performance Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.3 point loss due to thermal energy losses experience during reactor power changes and forced outages defined on pages 10 and 16.

4. The CoIIective Radiation Exposure Indicator; calculated over the previous 24 months, l

contributed to a 2.4 point loss, which was attributed to fuel failures and recent high exposure jobs l

during the refueling outage on page 19.

l

5. The Emergency AC PowerIndicator, calculated over the previous 24 months. contributed to a 0.6 point loss, which was a result of on-line maintenance, and replacement of relays under ECN95-347," Replace Relays for Seismic Adequacy" on page 15.

6. The Chemistry Performance Inder Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, corit ;truted to a 1.0 point loss, which is due to copper tubes in heat exchangers and mechanical shock to systems in the past year from forced outages defined on page 18.

i 4

Q Fort Calhoun index Value

--*-- W A NO M e d ia n in d e x Valu e FCS GOAL 90%

91.0 --

88.9 --

86.8 -- . . .

84.7 --

j 8 2.6 ~~ !84,0 f 80.5 -- I-f 78.4 -- 80 76.3 -- -c +

,ye

, e4 ,

1 74.2 --  %,' "[, g;, ' '

72.1 -- ^Y k 70.0  :

l l

['^

97/3 97/4 98/1 98/2 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND The Wano Performance Index Trend calculation is made up of eleven variables, each value is weighted to arrive at an overall index value. WANO calculates the performance Index value based on the industry reporting the information each quarter. The variables are calculated over a defined period of time as listed below.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR WEIGHTED FACTOR TIME Unit Capability Factor 16 24 Months Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 24 Months High Pressure Safety Injection 10 24 Months Auxiliary Feedwater 10 24 Months Emergency AC Power 10 24 Months Unplanned Auto Scrams /7000 Hours 8 24 Months Collective Radiation Exposure 8 24 Months Thermal Performance Indicator 6 12 Months Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 12 Months Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 12 Months Fuel Reliability Indicator 8 Quarterly I

5

18 00 ) 8 16.00 - D M A X I M U M V A L U E E First Qtr '98 E Second Qtr '98 g

14 00 -

8

, o N

$" 888 888

~

12.00 - 8 o ? o,

- ooo coo 10.00 - q

"** g ggg g g 8.00 - O Oo k 6.00 - 8 ,

.00 I i t- I i i 1 l  ! i i UCF UCLF HPSI AFW EACP CRE UA7 FRI CPI TPI ISAR WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS This graph shows the dfference between First Qtr '98 and Second Qtr '98 actual values achieved by Fort Calhoun.

CALCULATED OVER A 24 MONTH PERIOD MAXIMUM VALUE TREND UCF Unit Capability Factor 16 Decrease UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 Decrease HPSI High Pressure Safety Injection 10 No Change AFW Auxiliary Feedwater 10 No Change EACP Emergency AC Power 10 No Change UA7 Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7090 Hours 8 No Change CRE Collective Radiation Exposure 8 Decrease CALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD TPI Thermal Performance Indicator 6 No Change CPI Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 increase ISAR Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 No Change CALCULATED OVER A QUARTERLY PERIOD FRI Fuel Reliability indicator 8 Increase 6

e, _ m _ _. . ._ _ ._ _ __ . _

i i

r l

l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SUMMARY

REPORT ADVERSE TREND REPORT POSITIVE TREND REPORT A performance indicator with data representing three A performance indicator with data representing three consecutive consecutive months of declining performance or three consecutive months ofimproving performance or three consecutive months of months of performance that is trending toward declining as determined performance tiat is supenor to the stated goalis exhibiting a positive by the Manager - Nuclear Licensing, constitutes an adverse trend per trend per Nuclear Operatons Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD- Nuclear Operations Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD-QP-37). A QP-37). The following performance indicators exhbited positive supervisor whose performance indicator exhibits an adverse trend by trends for the reporting month. the definition may spectfy in wntten form (to be pubhshed in the report) why the trend is not adverse.The following performance Uno!anned Automate Ramr4er Scrams (Page 12) indicators exhibited adverse trends for the reporting month.

Heah Pressure safetyIniection System Safety System Performan g

(Page 13)

INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT

_ Aux Feed Water Svetem Safety System Performance (Page 14) ATTENTION REPORT Thermal Performa02L(Page 16) A performance indicator with data for the reporting period that is inadequate when compared to the OPPD goal is defined as Needing Volume of Low-Level Radoactive Waste (Page 21) Increased Management Attention"per (NOD-QP-37).

Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area (Page 35) t,asency AC Power (Page 15)

Secondary Statem Chemistry (Page 18)

Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (Page 25)

Cents Per Kilcwatt Hour (Page 30)

Radioloaical Work Practices Proaram (Page 36)

Temocrary MMT,c.Lons (Page 39) 7

i f

m Significant O Noteworthy 16 - 14 14 -

12 - g

[ 10 - 7 7 0- 5 5 f 3 2

3 2- 0 0 0 , , , , ,

f 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Noteworthy /Significant events at FCS are classified by INPO to identify precursors to events.

Th re was 0 Noteworthy and 0 Significant Events during themonth of August 1998.

Significant Events for August 1998:

= None

{

Noteworthy Events since start of INPO Cycle:

Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Overspeed and Overpressurization of Systan Piping

• Containment Hydrogen Panel Components Exceed Qualified Life Due to incorrect l

Calculation Assumptions f .

Transformer Fault and Loss of Off-Site Power While Shutdown Due to inadvertent Actuation of Transformer Deluge System e Degraded Steam Generator Tube Left in Service Due to Personnel Error j

e Reactor Coolant Pump Cavitation During Planned Pressure Reduction j Data Source: Frans/Guinn (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Frans/Guinn Trcnd: None 8

i f

l i

d WANO

! PERFORMANCE l

INDICATORS l

l l

! 1

{ 9

i Monthly Unit Capability Factor -e- 24 Month Unit Capability Factor 120 0% g $$$ $$g $$$$$g g g y 8 8 8 8 8 y 8 8 8 8 8 mm l 100.0 % 8 1 "- 0 g 0 0 8 0 1 0 C " E 8- 8

1. , m -

m ~.- g -

)

00.0% . e- 8 m' h g N,__ = e - a- m.- - - -- - -f

..-e-m 60 0 %

40.0 % 1998 RFo 20.0 % g# g g 0.0% .

8 8 8 8 5 S 5 B E E E E B B B E 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Ib$$k$$kIk$I$$$$k$$kIkN $

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy g:neration over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. The FCS Goal for the indicator is (87.5%) and ths WANO Median is (81.9%).

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 69.8 % 77.6 % 75.0% 80.1 %

Enerav Losses:

Forced Outage-Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Eysnt Period: September 10, thru13,1997.

Power Reduction- Faculty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Evsnt Period: August 26,28,1997.

Forced Outage- Circumferential cracking of a weld down stream of a moisture separator or to high system j stresses Evsnt Period: May 28, thru May 29,1997.

Forced Outage- Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system i Eysnt Period: April through mid May 1997. j A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCF indicator was 10.6 points out of 16 points. At the end of the Sicond Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.6 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 13.6.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None 10

C- 3 Monthly unplsnn2d Capebility Loss Factor .-e-- 24. Month RollinD AvercDa Fort Calhoun Goal (3 5% ) --*- WAN o industry Msdian (2.2%)

60.00 % - h

$ 0.00 % $

s 40.00 % -

i N $

30.00 % - - -

g h8 hhh $h#

~

$ g $# # h 8 8 10.00% - h _

__ / - - - Y p _ _

- -~^-----

~ T T I . . . .

[-

0.00%

44 4 44 2 44 4 4 4444 4448 4444 44 1

58EE$$EklNE$$8EEN$EEENE$

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy gsneration expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not produced as a result of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to c:uses under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they are not scheduled at least four weeks in advance.

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 5.76% 4.06 % 8.2% 7.4% __

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCLF indicator was 5.50 points out of 16 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.50 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.60.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Solymossy Trtnd: None 11

[ --e- 12-M: nth R:lling AvIrage

--+-- FCS Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critical for last 36 months Fort Calhoun Goal (0.0)

[ -e-- WANO Industry Median (0)

---m-- FCS Reactor Scrams - 1997 98 2 --

1-.. 1998 RFO

[

[ 0= b b b b b b b b b b b S U o S  % E i D E m o z 8" ,E u. z < z E

a <

z

[

[

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS

[ PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL Tne graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD goal for 1998

[ and the WANO Industry Median. Also the graph shows the number of Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. There were no Unplaaned Automatic Reactos during the month of August 1998. The 12-month rolling average (September 1997 b through August 1998) was 0. (September 1995 through August 1998) was 0.

b A 24 month calculation of the WANO UA7 indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 8.0.

{

b

{ Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: Positive b

[

{

. 12

i i Monthly HPSI System Unavailability Value

-*- 12 Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (0.003)

--e-- WANO Industry Median (0.002) 0.02 --

0.015 --

0.01 --

I 0.005 --

1998 RFO 1 a 'i,i;i: 1 I

O , , i:  : 1 :  : 1 ; i:  :

dj o o

,E $  %

E D E ,$ E O z $" u. 3 g 4 <

I I HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows tr e High Pressure Safety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, asdefined by WANO in the Safety System Performance indicator Definitions, for August 1998.

I The HPSI System unavall ability value for the month of August 1998 was 0.0. The e were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned unavailability, and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability. The 12 month rolling average was (September 1997 I through August 1998) was 0.00, and the year-to-date HPSI unavailability value was0.00 at the end of the month. For the previous year there was a total of 9.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of planned unavailability and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability for the HPSI system.

I A 24 month calculation of the WANO HPSI indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 10.0 Data Source: Skiles/Schaffer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sk9es/Schaffer L Trend: Positive

[

[

E

- 13 e

--o-12 Month AFW Un:v:llability Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01)

--- WANO Industry Median (0.001) 0.015 0.013 -

0.011 0.009 0.009 O.007 --

0.006 0.003 --

*N 0.002 0.002 s,-. mewo l 0.001 --g- j-- A-- -

o---

y -- y -- p -- p -- p --

1. 801 -

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug l AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined ty WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of August 1998.

The AFW System Unavailability Value for August 1998 was 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month. The 12 month l rolling average (September 1997 through August 1998) was 0.0017 and the year-to-date unavailability value was 0.0008 for August 1998.

I A 24 month calculation of the WANO AFW indicator was10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 I value of 10.0.

I Data Source: Skiles/Fritts (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Fritts I Trend: Positive

[

c 14

m Monthly Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value 1 -m- Year-to-Date Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Fort Calhoun Goal (0.024)

--A-- WANO industry Median (0.005) 0.07 - g 0.06 - d e 1 0.05 -

0.04 - g 0.03 - g g g g 0.02 -

l 0 01 - *~~~" "& 5 Wo ~,,- E . .

0 , ,

~

'," ,M,", .- ~, ,

8 5 8 S E E

< & E 4 F e o 8 g g u. 1 1 < o z 8 l v>

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

[ This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of August 1998.The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for August 1998 was 0.046. The Emergency

[ AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date was0.039 and the value for the last 12 months (September 1997 through August 1998) was 0.019.

[ Monthly Statistics Planned Unavailabilltv: DG-1: 3.4 DG-2: 65.75 Total: 69.15 YTD: 181.15 Hours Unolanned Unavailabilltv: DG-1: 0.0 DG-2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTO: 00.0 Hours A 24 month calculation of the WANO EACP indicator was 9.4 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 9.4 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 9.4.

[ Data Source: Skiles/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Ronning Trend: Needing increased Management Attention

{

L 15 I

m Monthly Thermal Performance r i 12-Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (99.7%)

--dr WANO Industry Median (99.1%)

~8 1998 8 8 8 y o>

RFO 8 8 8 g- g- y g g- y g- r-g- g- g -

99% +

I I I I I I I I I I m

98% - + l l --+' ' ' '

l l , ,  ;

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July August THERMAL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the monthly Thermal Performance Value, the rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median.

The thermal performance value for the month of August was 100.0%. The year to date value was reported as 99.9%. The 12 month rolling average (September 1997 through August 1998) was reported as 99.9%.

Note: Our Best Achievable Gross Heat Rate improved by 4% this month (it is now 63 BTU /kwh better than design.), Primarily this is attributable to the new High Pressure Turbine diaphragms that were installed during the 1998 refueling outage.

The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is an index value which is > 99.7%. The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPI indicator 99.1%.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPl indicator was 5.7 points out of 6 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.7 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.7.

Data Source: Skiles/Naser(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Naser Trend: Positive 16

l Fuel Reliability (E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

A End of 1998 Goal (17.3 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

-e- WANO Industry Median (0.21E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

E 100 -

2 3 10 - A

.E 1.8 5 1-2 o

3 0.1 -

u 0.01 - - ,

0.01 0.01 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The monthly Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) for August 1998 of 0.01 E-04 microcuries/ gram was based on steady state data at 100% power. The purpose of the FRI is to monitor industry progress in achieving and maintaining a high level of fuel integrity. An effective fuel integrity and p rformance monitoring program provides a means to detect fuel failures and assess the fuel failure number, physical condition, exposure, mechanism, and location.

Coolant activity data through August 31,1998 does not show the presence of any defective fuel rods. lodine activity levels are higher than expeced for a clean core. This is due to operating with fu:1 failures for the past 2.5 cycles which contributed to the large amount of tramp (lodine-134) and lodine-131 currently present in Cycle 18. The current lodine-134 activity indicates that 70 percent of the tramp material in the active core region was removed during the spring 1998 refueling outage. Xenon-133 is about 1.5 decades lower than in Cycle 17, another indication of a defect-free core.

The Quarterly calculation of the WANO FRI indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 0.0.

D:.ta Source: Guinn/Roenigk (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Stafford Trand: None 17

C""""3 Monthly Chemistry Indicator 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (1.1)

-a-WANO Industry Median (1.04) 3 --

2.43 2.5 - _

2--

1.5 -- 1.36 1.29 1.21

~

1.05 11 1 1.11 1,o4 ---

se g -

l 1998 h 0.5 -- -

t E RFO m .!j

(.  ; ,

O 0 '

~ ^{ O

l l l l l l l l l l Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY Steady state plant condito;:s required for calculating the Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) for plant performance following Refueling Outage that ended on June 3.

The CPI for August 1998 is 1.21, this is still higher than values from before the outage. Continuing b investigate. Reference memo FC-C-091-98, see action plan. The CPI value for the past 12 months (September 1997 through August 1998) was 1.175. The CPI value in the industry's upper quartile is 1.17.

Six parameters are used in the CPI calculation. Four of the parameters were below the WANO mean value which are as follows: 1) steam generator chloride, 2) sulfate, 3) feedwater iron, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. Increase in CPI observed this month due to power ascention from refuelirg ouiage. This is an expected condition.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO CPI Indicator was 7.0 points out of 7 points. At the end of the Sacond Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 7.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.60 Data Source: Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Hamilton Trend: Needing increased Management Attention i

18

M CRE Pe r sonnel Based on TLD QTRS Em %RedRIidnEquueED)

FCS Goal 224 REM + "WMSNN Si e

S 2D e

$l I h e:  :

175-150 -

h 1s)..

125 - tD -

100- 10-  ;;;

cn 25 - 0 E E 3 e U 0 m i

D m n m e n i i i t) ..h -- y , ,N ,p 1 2 3 4 4" h Fe Mr & My .in .D Ag Sp Qi Rv Dc COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE The 1998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhoun Station was established for a Total Dose of 224.0 person-rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are obtained. The exposure for August 1998 was 2.317 Person-rem (ED). The WANO Industry Median is 127 man-REM per year based on a three year average compared to 139 man-REM per year at FCS.

Dosa FCS Goal Person- First Otr. Second Third Qtr. Fourth Otr.

Rem Qtr.

Total 224.0 15.560 193.822 Person-Rem The 24 month calculation of the WANO CRE Indicator was 4.6 points out of 8 points. At the end of the S cond Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 4.6 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 7.0 D:ta Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: None SEP54 19

Monthly industrial safsty Accident & Disabling injuryllliness Rate

- dr-- 12 Month Rolling Average FCs Year End Goal (<0.40)

- Ye ar F0 WANo industry Goal (<0.40) 1-0.9 -

0.8 - ,,,

0.7 - $

Q N ct $ N 5 = = = =\ = ': b -

=

0.3 -

^ ~"""

0.2 - b 0 , , ,1 . I , e E , 1 ,

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel permariently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in tha indicator. This indicator is defined asthe number of accidents per 200,000 work-hours worked for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station that result in any of following:

one or more days cf restricted work (excluding the day of the accident.)

one or more days away from work (excluding the day of the accident.)

- fatalities, ISAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fatalities) x 200.000 (number of station person-hours worked)

The Fort Calhoun Station industrial Safety Accident Rate and Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate was 0.23 for the month of August 1998. The 12 month rolling average (September 1997 through August 1998) was 0. The year to date value was 3 at the end of August 1998. There w:s no restricted-time and no lost-time accident in August 1998.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO ISAR Indicatoris 5.0 points out of 5 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.0.

D:ta Source: Sorensen/Schneider(Manager / Source)

Solymossy/ Booth (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett '

Trand: None SEP 25,26 & 27 20

m Monthly Volume of LLRW(cu. meter)

Year-to-Date Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried

-A--WANO Industry Median (54 cu. meter) 60 -

a a a a a a a a a a A a 50 -

40 -

30 a

20 -

o

?? $ $ h 5 g aa s' s' s s' d a

e 0

f , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

{ VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator shows the volume of the monthly Radioactive Waste buried and the cumulative

{ yrar-to-date radioactive waste buried. The Fort Calhoun goal is 800 cu.ft.

Ft m8 f Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during current month : 000.0 0.00 Volume of solid radwaste buried during August 1998 : 79.9 2.26 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1998 : 335.7 9.50 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage : 000.0 00.00

{

The WANO industry Median is 54 cubicmeters per year. The industry Best Quartile value is cpproximately 26 cubic meters per year.

{

Data Source: Solymossy/Breuer (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: Positive SEP 54 r

l 21

I I

I SAFE OPERATIONS I

l Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear creanization. Individuals l demonstrate professionalism through self-ownership and personal initiative and open communication.

I I

I E

E E

n L 22

m Error Rita -FCS Gotl --m-Rolling Error Rata l j 9.000 8.51 00- 6.67 6.42 h" 6.000 -

5.000 _ 4.39 E 3.48 3.47 3.65 -

4.000 _ _

3.000 - $ gj 2A9 Y

2.000 11.06 l 2.19g .56 1 1.27

$ ~

$ 1 E L hi limi W W Im lW l W Imi imi W W E lhi U ," . '

\

/////////////////

//////// /////////

{

[ Fersonnel Error Rate The purpose of this indicator is to monitor human error events at FCS which are classified as a Noteworthy Event,"

7 under the criteria specified in the Condition Report Program. Noteworthy events may be classified as level one, two, t or three on a Condition Report or as defined but not limited to the examples listed below:

Error Rate = number of human errors x hours everv two weght 100,000 hrs

1. A recordable injury in industrial safety.

2. Valve Mispositioning event caused by plant personnel.

3. Equipment tagging error that significantly impacts safe operation of the plant, readiness or personal safety.

{ 4. Improper use of or failure to use safety equipment or performing a task in an unsafe manner.

5. Any event involving loss of radioactive material control that may cause or potentially result in an individual receiving an

[ unauthorized exposure.

{ 6. Any spill or spread of radioactive material, which results in an impact on the plant or the general safety of plant personnel or the general public.

7. Failure to utilize, or adhere to sound radiation principies, or accepted administrative controls to keep occupational f radiation exposure, or exposure to members of public ALARA.

8. CMmistry parameter (s) out of specification, involving insufficient chemistry corrective action or oversight.

9. Vr tion of procedure ci human performance error, 10.

f Less than 3 deep (qualified members) in minimum staffing position for the Control Room, TSC, OSC, and EOF.

11. Any unplanned impact to offsite evacuation routes or relocation capability.

12. Any failure or theft of emergency response equipment or supplies necessary to complete classification, notification, protective action recommendation or ERO command & control functions.

13. Inadequate training or qualification.

14. Failure to adequately staff the ER0 in actuai responses or drill notification.

The Rolling Error Rate is calculated over the past 12 month period. Until 12 months of data are available, this line is considered information only.

Data Source: Tesar/Burggraf (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Tesar Trend: None i

23

Monthly Recordable injurylltiness Rate 1998 F.C.S. Goal (1.5) j 2- l 1.6 -

1.2 -

l 0.8 - 0.63 7 0.43 0.4 - g 0.33 0.3 7 0.23

,bi ~

0 0 g ,l i, 3) 4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE I

This indicator shows the monthly Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if personnel from any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job !

cnd require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid.  !

l The recordable injury / illness for the month of August 1998 was one. The recordable injury l

occurred during Fire Brigade Training at the Omaha Fire Tower, where a trainee received minor i

thermal burns as a result of heat build-up/ transfer inside of protective bunker gear. The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.

l i

l Drta Source: Sorensen/Schneider(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Puckett i Trend: None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 l 24

E Contamination Events (Monthly)

O Contamination Events (YTD) 90 -

84 80 77

~

70 .

70 - 65 -

[

60 - , .

50 4' '

+

s 40 - 36 i ,

7

^

29 7

20 1 p

20 - _

y -

33 1

~ ^

10 - 66 7 7 6 I I "

0 , , ,

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep oct Nov Dec CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >1,000 _

DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for contaminations >1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for August 1998.

There were 7 personnel contamination events in August 1998. The total year-to-date of Personnel events is 84 at the end of August 1998. This indicator has been classified as "Needing increased Management Attention," due to an upward trend of Year to date contamination events over the past three months.

{

D ta Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability : Solymossy/Puckett Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 15 & 54 25

35

-+-Total Events 18 Month Totals 30 - 0 0

--o- Preventable

-*-Personel Error

~

5' 5<

,-r -

5 5 5 5 m_ ,

0 m a a a a a a a a a a a a a s s s 8

$ $ k Nk k $$$ $ $ $ $ $ k $$ $

PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs.

The graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnel Error LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the LER event date as opposed to the LER report date.

In July 1998, there was one (1) event which were subsequently reported as an LER. No LER was categorized as " Preventable" and No LER was categorized as " Personnel Error" during the month of July. The total LERs for the year 1998 are nine. The total Personnel Error LERs for the year 1998 are two.

The year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values forthe 18-month totals not to exceed 5 Preventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs.

NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.

L Data Source: Frans/Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None SEP 15 E

E 26

Misc 13%

9%

vyp; dO i , ' ,

,3- 4g rJv I \ 1J l

, , :l '

LO Err.

13%

Nil l(

9 I Design 43

Other &r.

I 13%

Maint.

9%

I g LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by event date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past eighteen months from February 1997, through July 31,1998. To be consistent with the Preventable / Personnel Error LERs indicator, thi.s indicator is reported by the LER event date, as opposed to the LER report date.

The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.

I NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-month behind.There was one event in July 1998 that resulted in an LER. There were no missed surveillance tests resulting I in LERs during July 1998. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for this indicator is 0.

Data Source: Frans/Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None SEP 60 & 61

[

27

gHr; UNM SALP # 12 Month m FCS Cited Violations (MonmM M FCS Nonated Violations (MontNy) a 2 -

[ 10 -

u[ s.. -

l m , ,

g 12-~ ~

6 g_ _

U ~ ~

6 6- -

N ..E E

^

!y{ Ix IISkar; TI E A' !;

e:g :h;e 3

s8 esaen5  : ;ss i i VIOLATION TREND This indicator depicts twelve months of violationdata for Fort Calhoun Station. Illustrated monthly are Cited Violations and Non-Cited Violations. The current SALP cycle began on August 3,1997 and ends on January 30,1999.

The following inspection reports noting violations were issued during August 1998:

Violation Level lER No. Title NCV (1) 98-12 Special Inspection - AFW Pump overspeed NCV (4) 98-14 Resident Monthly To date, OPPD has received forty five violations for inspection reports issued in the current SALP cycle. Two (2) Level IV violations received in August 1997 and three (3) Level IV violatios received in October 1997, were carried over from the previous SALP cycle due to a lag in the reporting process.

Level lli Violations 1 Level IV Violations 21 Non-Cited Violations .23__

Total 45 The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the top quartile plants in Region IV.

Data Source: Frans/Cavanaugh (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Frans Trend: None 28

i I

I I

I I

i COST l Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that cost

_ effectively maintains nuclear generation as an economically viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line. Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the organization.

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

29

l 12 Month Rolling Average

--+-- Actual -e- Budget --o- Plan 4.00 3.50 -

t 3 00 =

__. = = = = =

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00

? 4444 4 44 4 4 4 4 4iHg E88$E5]44EkEN45h8$$ 2 E

CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR July 1998 The purpose of this indicator is to quantrfy the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour ;

indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current year. l The basis for the budget curve is the approved 1998 revised budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report.

The December 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1993 through 1997. In addition, the report shows the plan amounts for the years 1999 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the Wuclear Long Range Financial Plan and the 1998 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels.

l Tha 12-month rolling average unit price period of ( August 1997 through July 1998) averaged above budget due to tha extended refueling outage and less generation during the period. The 12 month rolling average is 3.27 cents per kilowatt hour.

Tha year to-date average is trending in a positive direction.

Cents per KWH Jan Feb Mar Aor May Jun Jul Auo Seo Oct Nov Dec Eudget Y-T-D 3.02 2.85 3.27 4.13 3.81 3.53 3.37 3.21 3.13 3.08 3.01 2.96 Actual Y-T-D 2.96 2.85 3.00 3.26 4.16 4.39 4.03 NOTE: This information normally lags by a month due to the short turn around required for processing.

Dzta Source: Gayoso/ Huang (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Belek/ Huang Tr:nd: Needing incresed Management Attention 30

DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power production.

.u

m Corrective Maintenance m Preventive Maintenance C Non-Corrective / Plant im provements Fort Calhoun Goal (200) 696 23 80 - 592 808 773 700 836 644 633 667 800 --

632 571 600 -

400 -

300 200 - -

100 --

0 - + + + -+- -+ '

+"+ + + -+- -+

Non-Outage Maintenance Work Document Backlog a To1aiMWDs PERCENT oF MWtYS PAST GOAL BY PRioRmf M WD PRIO RITY Priority 2 Priority 1 3%

600 0%

500 - Priority 3 400 18 %

300 200-- I47 114 Pdody 4 100 - 2 24 79 %

0 + 8 " -+- ~ -+- -+- -4 Priority Ftiority Priority Priority Prionty 1 2 3 4 5 MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month,a breakdown by maintenance classification and priority. The 1998 goal for this indicator is 200 nonautage corrective maintenance MWDs. The current backlog of corrective MWDs is149 to ensure that the MWD backlog is worked in a t'mely manner, non-outage maintenance completion goals have been established as follows:

.Gnal Priority 1 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Priority 2 7 days Priority 3 30 days Priority 4 90 days l Priority 5 As resources permit Note: This is the most current information available due to Rams conversion.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 36 32

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 100 %

% 74 % 79% 79 %

80 % 76 % 75 % 75% 74 % 77 %

72 %

T 5 71 a / 7

~~ ~

59 % 59 %

~

~

60 % i g; y ,

w; '

[j '

n s I

4 40 % @ 'O O I'! Y  ;

'_ l L

.a , c ,.

> +

,4 4 hr , lH , di l9 Y -

0% 1 -+ l -+ 4

• 4 - c A-+ d -+ 5ll: --+- -

' I -+ A -+ " -4 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug m Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2%

I 7% --

6.02%

6% - 5.50%

~

4.09%

4% - -

O W.

\ 3.03%

3% - 2.40 % \ 2.60% 2.60%

2% .

1% -

O.80% 0.50 %

0% -- --+-  ; -+- -+ -+- -+- -+ E -+- l -1 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug I RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE I The top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to totalmaintenance was 77% for the month of August 1998.

I The lower graph shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that were not completed by the late finish date. From the period of(July 15th thru August 15th)

I there were 14PM's that were completed late or not completed out of 531 scheduled. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue is a maximum of 2%.

Note: This is the most current information available due to Rams conversion.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 41 & 44 b 33

Human Performance CRs (Maintenance) 20 --

I 18 --

16 --

14 --

7C

$ 12 -- 11 10 --

0 l }8 -

z O

6--

I 4-- 3 2 2 2-- 1 1 1 1 0  : E:Y:Y:  :  :  :  :  :  :  : E:

Sep Oct f*w Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug i PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS l (MAINTENANCE) l This indicator shows the number of Condition Reports related to procedural noncompliance incidents assigned to the Maintenance Department.

l l

I I

I Data Scurce: Clemens/Burggraf (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 I

I 34

b l m Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (5%)

( 6% --

^

5% - 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8%

[

4% --

[

3% --

2% --

( 1% -

[ 0% l 1 l l 1 l l l l l l 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I

[ CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that is

{ contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of August 1998, the total contaminated area was 3383 square feet which is 4.8 percent of the RCA . The monthly FCS goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area.

{

[ Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: Positive SEP54 35

i m Monthly Pc >r Radiation Worker Practices m Total PR'M' for 1998 I

1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (<20) l 25 18 18 14 15 -

11 10 5 33 3 3 2

0 i i  :- i i i i i i i i i j Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month.

The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. This j indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 month increasing trend of poor  ;

radiation worker practices based on YTD.

During the month of August there was O PRWP identified. I l

There have been a total of 18 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998.

=

The 1998 FCS goalis <20 PRWPs, the 1997 gocl was <15 PRWPs.

i Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 52 ,

36

E Documents Scheduled for Review s Document Reviews complete during month O Documents Overdue 300 --

250 --

+ j .

i -; + i 4 j  ; !

i Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June J uly Aug

1997 1998 DOCUMENT REVIEW The Document Review indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater 1 than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.The documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan,

) Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

j I

During August 1998, there were 102 document reviews scheduled, while 118 reviews were i completed. At the end of the month, there were 15 document reviews more than 6 months i

overdue. There were 0 new documents initiated during August 1998.

Data Source: Ponec/Plath (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Ponec Trend: None SEP 46 37

L

[ 35

[ 30 -- -

25 -- - -

20 -- - -

l-

~

15 -- - - - - - "" '- '

10 -- - - - -

Y

[ s-- - - - - -

0= , , , , , , ,

, i i i i JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NoV DEC 98 Loggables 98 Non-Loggables

[

97 Loggables - - + - 97 Non-Loggables

[

[ SECURITY INCIDENTS The Loggable and Non-Loggable incident (Security) Indicators are depicted in the chart above.

[ The chart depicts the total number of loggable and non-loggable human error events and system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

[ During the month of August 1998, there were 11 loggable incidents and 4 non-loggable incidents identified (excluding access denials). Of all incidents identified this month seven (7) were human error events. Of loggable events, four (4) were human performance errors and seven (7) were

[ system failures. There were five (5) internal human performance errors in August. There was one (1) non-loggable access denial during the reporting period. The increase in internal human r performance errors for the month is a concern that is being addressed during security force shift t briefings.

(

Data Source: Sefick/ Clark (Manager / Source)

( Accountability: Sefick Trend: None SEP 58 f

r 38 r

m Temporary Modificatons >1-fuel cycle old (RFO required for rerroval) m Temporary Moddications >6 rrenths old (Rerrovable on-line)

Fort Calhoun Goals for both Terrporary Modifications' categor,es 4.5- ,

-r i Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July August )

l TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the number of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of TMs removable on-line that are greater than six months old. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goals for both of the TM categories are zero.

l At the end of August 1998, there were no TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for removal.

At the end of August 1998, there were four (4) TMs installed that were greater than six months old that could b e removed on-line. TM 96-039, Railroad Siding / Corridor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996. EAR 97-219 will close this TM; it requiresComponent Testing review approval, and is expectedto be completed by January 1,1999. TM 97-021, I CCW corrosion monitor, was installed February 18,1998. TM 97-021 was expected to be removed, August 18,1998; I however the TM is stillin place. TM 97-022,LPSI Header Pressure Gauge at PT-325, was installed December 12,1997. l ECN 98-161 will be used to remove this TM by January 1,1999. TM 98-005, YlT 6286 A&B YlT 6288 A&B was installed February 27,1998. MR-FC-98-003 is expected to remove this TM by October 26,1998.

l At the end of August 1998, there was a total of twelve (12) TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. Three (3) of the twelve (12) installed TMs require an RFO for removal and nine (9) are removable on-line. In 1998, a total of nineteen

[ (19) TMs have been installed. At the end ofAugust 1998, there were three (3) procedural or maintenance configuration l afterations (PMCAs)(a special classification of TM)instaled in the Fort Calhoun Station using PRC approved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order O-25.

I l

l l

Data Source: Skiles/Plott (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/ Core Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 62&71 I

l 39

.i Total Modification Packages Open i

1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (68) l 69 -

67 - 65 65 65 -

63 - 62 61 N #

61 - 7 -

f 3 59 - <c  : ..

57 -

55 ,

jp d , , , , ,

May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of Outstanding Modifications (excluding outstanding modifications which are orocosed to be cancelled.).

Reporting Cateoorv '90 '94 m 2 '92 '91 _'el Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 D: sign Engr. Backlog /in Progress 0 0 0 0 3 2 23 Construction Backlog /In Progress 1 0 3 4 17 1 26 Drsign Engr. Update Backlog /In Progress _A 4 _2 _1 _.Q __Q _12 Totals 6 4 5 5 20 25 65 (outage + OnLine) (2+4) (2+2) (5+0) (1+4) (16+4) (18+7)

The 1998 year-end Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 68 outstanding modifications.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

. Accountability: Jaworski Trend: None

! 40 l

NO DATA AVAILABLE ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST BREAKDOWN y

l This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering and System Engineering. The 1998 year-and goal for this indicator is a maximum of 120 outstanding EARS.

NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skile/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 41

NO DATA AVAILABLE ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS a

NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Skiles Trend: None SEP 62 42

NO DATA AVAILABLE ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE OPEN I

I NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

I I

I Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source) l Accountability:

Trend:

Jaworski/Skiles None SEP 62 1

[

43

MAINTENANCE RULE UNAVAILABILITY PERFORMANCE m33 #ssCs Exceeding Unavailability Critena C- J # ssCs Monitored ---a-% Exceeding Unavailabikty Cnteria 70- -- --- - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

--- 14.0%

, 60 -

- 12.0%

N 50 -

-- 10.0%

g 40 -

7 - 8.0 %

$ 30 -

6.0%

m E 20 - g -- 4.0 %

10 -- r N - -- 2.0 %

0 E ,

, 0.0%

3-96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 2-98 QTR Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Unavailability Performance value which is based on the perfomance of SSC's which have specific Availability Perforrnance Criteria.

A single SSC, Inverter Bypass Transformer #1, EE-4S, continues to exceed its Unavailability Performance Criteria. The performance trend for this SSC is improving.

Data Source Skiles/Swearngin/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

! Accountability: Skiles l Trend: None 44

MAINTENANCE RULE SSC RELIABILITY PERFORMANCE m Total Failures (C, D, F) i i Maintenance Preventable Failures -*-- Rercent Maintenance Preventable 140 70.0 %

120 -

-- 60.0%

e 100 -- _

-- 50.0%

u 80 3 , l

- 40.0%

R '

!.I g 60 -- _

_ i -- 30.0%

~~

1 40 -- -

- 20.0%

20 -- ,

-- 10.0%

0 -

, , , , l - l l 0.0%

3-96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 2-98 QTR Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Reliabilty Performance value which is based on tracking being ccmpiled based on component failures since 10CFR50.65 was implemented in July of 1996. The percent of " Maintenance Preventable" failures is 57% at the end of the second quarter of 1998. The Reliability Indicator for the second quarter of 1998 shows that the percentage of failures identified as " Maintenance Preventable" and the total number of equipment failures is trending upward. The increase in total identified failures is an expected trend attributable to increased Maintenance activities during the refueling outage.

Data Source Skiles/Swearngin/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles Trend: None 45

I O Total Requailfication Training Hours a SimulatorTraining Hours a Non-Requalification Training Hours a Numberof Exam Failures 35 -

33 32 32 32 _

31 30 -

25 -

20 -

18 15 4 14 2 2 10 -

8 88 8 8 8 5-3 0 0 0 0 00 0000 0-- --

i-L , - , - - -

i i ,

i i Cycle 97 5 Cycle 97-6 Cycle 97 7 Cycle 98-1 Cycle 98-2 Cycle 98-3 Cycle 98-4 Cycle 98-5 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides inforrnation on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification &

validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manage lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, sr'nulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

Note: Due to the fact that Rotation 98-5, Requalification Training was not completed during August, no new statistics are being provided.

Data Source: Westcott/G uliani (Manager /Sou rce)

Accountability: Westcott/Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 46

O SRO Exams Administered 3 SRO Exams Passed O RO Exams Administered O RO Exams Passed g_

12 10 --

5-- 4 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 3 0 0 l l l l l l l l l l l Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 1998 This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of August 1998, there were 4 (SRO) exams administered and 12 (RO) exams administered with no failures.

Data Source: Westcott/G uliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Westcott/Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 47

+

F 0 MWD ON HOLD 2 MWR's NOT YET PROCESSED 358 360 326 Sr5IEM ENNIRG FPRIS 310 - Ems 94 74 176 O NFEM W 260 2 .5 'c!' d 71 794 Jun-98 Jul-98 Aug-98 MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in Cycle 18 RFO. This graph indicates:

Parts Holds - Planning Complete, Awaiting Parts System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering input to Planning Planner Holds - Maintenance Planner has not completed planning the work package.

ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacanent items ECN from DEN.

In Review - Planning Complete awating SE, ISI and QC review.

Note: This is the most current information available due to Rams conversion.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sollymossy/ Herman Trend: None SEP 31 .

• - pg 48

3LAS1 B THIS O FOR SCHEDULE 100 --

90 --

80 --

70 --

. 60 --

1 g 60 -

o

1. 40 --

30 -

20 --

10 -- , ,

0 " i i

Y a

Is E i 8

3

! I i  !

i s s [s 1 3 51 En  % }g }

g t

6

?!

g.

I 8

! j E 3 *

]

a a COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1998 OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT Data Source Skiles/Bloyd/Boughter (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Bloyd/Boughter Trend: None SEP 31 49

+ Actual FRC[hte a Target FFC Date 6/15/99 -

5f26/99 -

4/16/99 -

I 3f27/99 -

3/7/99 -

e e a e a a a e a e a a a a a 2/15/99  :

9 3 3 3 9 9 8 m m m 8 8 2 m

2 o

2 e m 2

o 2

m 2

m 8

m 8

m PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 This indicator shows the status of Modificationsapproved for instal!ation during the Cycle 19 Refuelin!

Outage (September 1999).

The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were approved for accomplishmen prior to September 25,1998, PRC approved by March 18,1999.

I August 1998 Modifications added: 4 Deleted = 0 I

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 I

50 1

l .. .

l 1

NO DATA AVAILABLE 6

l 3 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 0UTAGE B MODS AND ECNS ADDED TO 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE This indicator will show the status of Modificatbns and ECNi approved for installation during 3 the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. The goal for thi^, ;ndicator is to have all modification packages B PRC approved by their target date.

August 1998 Modificatioi ., ,ECNs AMed = 0 Deleted = 0 I

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 33 I

51 I

(

+ Actual Approve Date a Target Approve Date

(

10/28/98 a m ,

9/28/98 -

8/29/98 - E 7/30/98 -

6/30/98 -

8 f

5

( S/31/98 -

5/1/98 -

4/1/98 -

3/2/98 -

1/31/98 . . .

[ !f$$$$$$

8o 8E EE

8@m@88 m

[

[ PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-

[ line installation during 1998.

The goal for this indicator is to have all MOD /ECN packages approved by their scheduled

[ date.

[

August 1998 MOD /ECN Added:3 Deleted: 0

[

[ Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31

{

[

{

r u 52

1

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

ACTION PLANS

[

SEP INDEX

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

s:,

[ ACTION PLANS This secton Istsacton plans that have been developed for the performance indcators cted as Adverse Trends dunng the month precedng th s report. Also included are Acton Plans for indcators that have been cted in the preceding month's report as Needing increased Managemert A*tenton for three (3) consecutive months.

f in accordance wth Revision 5 of NOD-OP-37, the following performance indcators would require acton plans based on three (3) consecutive months of performance cted as "Needng increased Management Attention";

Emergency AC Power (page 15) f This indcator was high in July and August due to penned mantenance. For the first time, desel refueling frequency tasks were performed on line. Approximately 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> was requred on esch desel for on line maintenance. The decision to perform on-line mantenance was a management deccion with full knowledge tha' unavalabity would increase. It is expected that unavailability will go down to previous low levels i{ for the next 12 months.

Secondary System Chemistry ( > age 18)

Recent chemistry analysis results indicate bc eased impurdy concentraton in our Steam Generator blowdown chemistry. The Chemistry D3partment is investigating this trend and is considering an acton plan that would include the manipulaton of vanous systems that would reouire Operatons Department support Some of these would include:

. Adjustments to Steam Generator blowdown

. Adjustments to Chemical Feed Secunng RO und make-up to the Condensate Storage Tank for extended penods as allowed by CST level.

Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (page 25)

The Routine Decon Schedule was revised to improve the daily maintenance of clean areas in the RCA. A status sheet wth a sign-off will provde administratNe guidance and controls to ensure clean areas are beng properly maintained by a designaud responsible person. These improvements should result h less Clean Controlled Area Contaminatons.

[

t . Cents Per Kilowatt Hour (page 30)

The hereased cost has been due to the unexpected refueling outage extension which also caused the higher expenditures and the less power

[ generated. Nuclear Planning Department has intiated cost awareness efforts by dstrbuting the monthly update on power generation, O/M cost

[ and Captal cost to all nuclear departments and year-to-date cost data to all nuclear personnel. In addton, the Nuclear organizaton is developng the 1999 Business Plan based on the Six Factor Formula -CHOICE to address the issues and actons on safe operations, high performance and competitNe cost. The effectNeness of the Business Plan will be evaluated routinely by the nuclear management team.

Radiological Work Practices Program (page 36)

Changes in the intial General Employee Traning (GET) Program are being addressed by a Traning Advsory Commttee to make progran hiprovements. The On-Lhe Poor Radiation Worker Practces were recently identifed by CR 199801434. Implementaten of the Actons items f irsted below are being addressed by the Condtion Report, which should result in an bcreased awareness for knproving Rad Worker Practces in the RCA.

Dethe the rolo of the Shnt RP Technician to reduce over rehanace on the RP Staff and ensure Rad Workers have sufficient knowledge pnor to accesshg the RCA.

Perform a Human Performance evaluaton of the Survey Maps used by the Rad Workers.

Evaluate the effectiveness of the postmgs used h the RCA.

Evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the blormaton provided at eh RCA Access Control Point.

• Ensure the RP Shift Tech has the approptate hformation avaHable.

Evaluate the content and methods of the GETProgram.

Evaluate the effectiveness of the postmgs used h the RCA.

Temporary Modifications (page 39)

Based on the current trend of Temporary Mod (catons >6 months old (removable on-line) the Temporary Modicatons Indcator is class (ed as "Needs increased Management Attenton". Presently, there are four (4) Temporary Mod (catons which have been installed greater than six months. An acton plan has been developed to expedie removal of the TMs and increase managements awareness of the issue. System Engineerng will be actuely pursuing resolution on closure of these Temporary Mod (catons.

54

L PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX

[

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX switches or, manual turbine trip switches (or

{ This indicator index is calculated from a weighted push-buttons) provided in the main combination of eleven performance indcator values, which controiroom, include the following: Unit Capability Factor, Unplanned 4) Critical means that during the steady-state

[ CapabHy Loss Factor, HPSI, AFW, Emergency AC Power condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the

1. System, Unplanned Automatic Scrams, Collective Radiation effective multiplication (k ,, ) was essentially equal Exposure, Fuel Reliability, Thermal Performance, to one Secondary System Chemistry, and Industrial Safety ( Page 12)

Accident Rate.

( ( Page 6 ) HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR f The sum of the known (planned and unplanned)

The ratio of the available energy generation over a given unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for time period to the reference energy generation (the energy the high pressure safety injection system for the reporting that could be produced if the unit were operated period divided by the c:;tical hours for the reporting period

, cantinuously at full power under reference ambient multiplied by the number of trains in the high pressure safety conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a injection system. (Page 13) percentage. ( Page 10 )

AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM

[ UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR PERFORMANCE The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) f period of time, to the reference energy generation (the unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for energy that could be produced if the unit were operated the auxiliary feedwater system for the reporting period continuously at full power under reference ambient divided by the critical hours for the reporting period

[ conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a murtplied by the number of trains in tM auxiliary feedwater

[ percentage. ( Page 11 ) system.( Page 14 )

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS PERFORMANCE This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) automatic scrams (RPS logic actuations) that occur per unavalable and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of critical operation.

( emergency AC power system for the reporting period divided by the number of hours in the reporting period The value for this indicator is calculated by multiplying the multiplied by the number of trains in the emergency AC 7 total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams in a power system.( Page 15)

{ specific time period by 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />, then dividing that number by the total number of hours critical in the same THERMAL PERFORMANCE time period. The indicator is further defined as follows:

( The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the

( 1) Unplanned means that the scram was not an adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage.

anticipated part of a planned test. ( Page 16)

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of negative reactivity (e.g., by control rods, liquid injection system, etc.)

that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The signal may have resulted from exceeding a set point or spurious.

3) Automatic means that the initial signal that caused t.ctuation of the reactor protection system logic

[ was provided from one of the sensor's monitoring

( plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram

55

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX FUEL RELIABILITYINDICATOR INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS RATE This hdicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in and normalized to a common punfcation rate. Tramp hiproving industrial safety performance for utility personnel uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours internals from previous defective fuel or is present on the are not included in this indicator. Also, this indicator is surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process. defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel Steady state is defined as continuous operation for at least permanently assigned to the station, involving days away three days at a power level that does not vary more than + from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-or -5%. Plants should collect data for this indicator at a years). This does not include contractor personnel. This powerlevelabove 85%, when possible. Plants that did not indicator tracks personnel performance for SEP #25,26 &

operate at steady-state power above 85% should collect 27.(Page 20 )

data for this ndicator at the highest steady-state power level attained during the month. VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The density correction factor is the ratio of the specife bolume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature (540 This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid degrees F., Vf = 0.0217) divided by the specirc volume of radioactNe waste actually shipped for burial. This indicator coolant at normal letdown temperature (120* F at outlet of also shows the volume of low-level radioactive waste which the letdown cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163), which is in temporary storage, the amount of radioactive oil that results in a density correction factor for FCS equal to 1.33. has been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of

( Page 17 ) solid dry radioactive waste which has been shipped off-site for processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms INDEX genarated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and mabtenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, based on the concentration of key impurities in the plastic contahers, and any other material to be disposed of secondary side of the plant. These keyimpurities are the at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all Cnteria for calculating the cpl are: radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological

1) The plant is at greater than 30 percent power; and work performance for SEP #54. ( Page 21 )

2) the power is changing less than 5% per day. RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE The CPIis calculated using the following equation:

The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid CPI = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chloride /1.52) +(Sulfate /1.44) + per 200,000 man-hours worked. This indicator trends (Iron /3.30) + (Copper /0.30)+(Condensate O2/2.90))/6 personnel performance for SEP #15,25 and 26.

( Page 24 )

Where: Sodium, sulfate, chloride and condensate dissolved oxwen are the monthly average blowdown concentrations CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >

in ppb, iron and copper are monthly time weighted average 1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA feedwater concentrations n ppb. The denominator for eaof The personnel contamination events in the clean controlled the frve factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly area. This indicator tracks personnel performance for SEP average for a specife parameter is less than the INPO #15 & 54. ( Page 25 )

median value, the median value is used in the calculation.

( Page 18) PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE This ndcatoris a breakdown of LERs. For purposes of LER event classifcaton, a " Preventable LER" is defined as:

CollectNe radiation exposure is the total extemal whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel (including An event for which the root cause is personnel error (i.e.,

contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured inappropnate acton by one or more ndividuals), inadequate by the thermolumbencent dosimeter (TLD). Collective administratrve controls, a design constructon, installators radiation exposure is re3orted in units of person-rem. This installaton, fabricaton problem (involving work completed by or tndicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54. supervised by OPPD personi,al) or a maintenance probkyn

( Page 19 ) (attributed to inadequate or rnproper upkeep / repair of plant 56

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX

[ equprent). Also, the cause of the event must have occurred wthin electronic pieco-parts and failures due to approxmately two years of the " Event Date" spec (ed in the LER meteorological conditions such as lightning, (e g , an event for which the cause is attrbuted to a problem with ice, high winds, etc. Generally, it includes

[ the onginal design of the plant would not be considered preventable).

spurious or one-time falures. Electric components included For purposes of LER event classrfcation, a " Personnel in this category are circuit cards, rectifers, bistables, fuses,

[ Error" LER is defined as follows: capacitors, diodes, resistors, etc.in addition this indicator reports SEP # 6 & 61. (Page 27)

An event for which the root cause is inappropriate action on the part of one or more individuals (as opposed to VIOLATION TREND this indicator is defined as Fort

{- being attributed to a department or a general group). Calhoun Station Cited Violations and Non-Cited Violations Also, the inappropriate action must have occurred within trended over 12 months. Additionally, CitedViolations for approximately two years of the " Event Date" specifed in the top quartile Region IV plant istrended over 12 months

[ the LER. Additionally, each event classifed as a (lagging the Fort CalhounStation trend by 2-3 months). It

" Personnel Error" should also be classrfed as is the FortCalhoun Station goal to be at or below the cited

" Preventable." This indicator trends personnel violation trend for thetopquartileRegion IV plant.

performance for SEP ltem #15. ( Page 26 ) ( Page 28 )

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR BREAKDOWN The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical This indicator shows the number and root cause code for operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per kilowatt Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per follows: kilowatt hour on a twelve-month average for the current year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved yearly

1) Administrative Control Problem - budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Management and supervisory defciencies Operating Report.

that affect plant programs or activities (i.e., ( Page 30 )

[ poor planning, breakdown or lack of adequate management or supervisory MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG control, incorrect procedures, etc).

This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage

[ 2) Licensed Operator Error - This cause code Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end captures errors of omission / commission by of the reporting month. Maintenance classifications are Icensed reactor operators during plant defined as follows:

activities.

{ Corrective - Repair and restoration of equipment or

3) Other Personnel Error - Errors of components that have faile1 or are malfunctioning and omission / commission committed by non- are not performing their intended function.

[ licensed personnel involved in plant activities.

Preventive - Actions taken to maintain a piece of

4) Maintenance Problem - The intent of this equipment within design operating conditions, prevent cause code is to capture the full range of problems which equipment failure, and extend its life and are perforr ed

[ can be attributed in any way to programmatic derciencies prior to equipment failure.

in the maintenance functional organization. Activities included in this category are maintenance, testing, Non-Corrective / Plant improvements - Maintenance surveillance, calibration and radiation protection. actMties performed tom' plement station improvements or

[ to repair non-plant equipment.

5) Design / Construction / Installation / Fabric ation Problem - This cause code covers a Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as:

( full range of programmatic derciencies in the areas of design, construction, installation, and Emergency - Conditions which significantly degrade fabrication (i.e., loss of control power due to station safety or availability.

f underrated fuse, equipment not qualtfed for L the environment, etc.). Immediate Action - Equipment deficiencies which signifcantly degrade station reliability. Potential for unit

6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece- shutdown or power reduction.

Parts or Environmental-Related Failures)

- This code is used for spunous failures of Operations Concern - Equipment deficiencies which r

57

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX

( hinder station operation. performance for SEP #46. ( Page 37 )

r Essential Routine corrective maintenance on essential SECURITY INCIDENTS

{ station systems and equipment.

The total number of security incidents for the reporting Non-Essential- Routine correctue maintenance on non- month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks security essential station systems and equipment. performance for SEP #58. ( Page 38)

Plant improvement - Non-corrective maintenance and TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS plant hiprovements.

The number of tempotary mechanical and electrical

[ This indicator tracks maintenance performance for configurations to the plant's systems.

SEP #36. ( Page 32 )

1) Temporary configurations are defined as RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE & electricel jumpers, electrical blocks, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance systems and are not shown on the latest tastir,g and calibration procedures) to the sum of non- revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance wiring, or flow diagrams.

completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours. Also 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for displayed are the percent of preventive maintenance items Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, in the month that were not completed or administratively Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures closed by the scheduled date pluc a grace period equal to or Operating

( 25% of the scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventre maintenance activities for SEP #41. ( Page 33 )

Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless the jumper or block remains in place after the test or PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks

[ (MAINTENANCE) installed in test or lab instruments are not considered as temporary modrfications.

The number of identified incidents concerning maintenance T procedurai probiems, tne number of closed irs related to 3) Scaffold is not considered a temporary t the use of procedures (includes the number of closed irs modification. Jumpers and blocks which are caused by procedural noncompliance), and the number of installed and for which Mrs have been closed procedural noncompliance lRs. This indicator trends submitted will be considered as temporary

( personnel performance for SEP #15,41 and 44. ( Page 34) modificatons until final resolution of the MR and the jumper or block is removed or is CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA permanentlyrecorded on the drawings. This 7 bdicator tracks temporary modifications SEP 1

The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which #62 and 71.

includes the auxiliary bt.ilding, the radwaste budding, and ( Page 39) areas of the C/RP building, that is contaminsted based on

[ the total square footage. This indicator tracks performance ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR)

{ for SEP #54. ( Page 35) BREAKDOWN RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM This indicator shows a breakdown, by age and priorrty of the EAR, of the number of EARS assigned to Design

{ The number of identrfied pocr radiological work practices Engineering Nuclear and System Engineering. This (PRWPs) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. ( Page 41 )

radiological work performance for SEP #52. ( Page 36) f ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)

The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were f The Document Review Indicator shows the number of completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion by

( documents reviewed, the number of documents scheduled DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks for review, and the number of document reviews that are performance for SEP #62, overdue for the reporting month. A document review is ( Page 42) considered overdue if the review is not complete within six months of the assigned due date. This indicator tracks L 58 L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 This indcator breaks down the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNS) that are assigned to Design This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and for installation dunng the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. This Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31. ( Page50)

Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement items open.

and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND ECN'S

( Page 43) ADDED TO '99 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator will show the status of Modifications and The total number of hours of training given to each crew ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle 19 during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator training Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), the SEP #33. ( Page 51) number of non-REQUALIFICATION training hours and the number of exam failures. This indicator tracks training Progress of 1938 On-Line modification Planning performance for SEP # 68. ( Page 46)

This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.

This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO ( Page 52 )

quizzes and exams that are administered and passed each month. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP 068.

( Page 47)

MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 19 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indcator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDS) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance 031

( Page 48)

COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING 19980UTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT This Indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

( Page49) 59

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM lNDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance indicators index is to list performance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15 Ei!Lqa e increase HPES and IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . 34 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate .. . . . . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations 11,000 Disintegrations / Minute Per Probe Area 25 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs .

. . 26 SEP Reference Numbers 25. 26. & 27

= Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented

. Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements

• Implement Supervisory Enforcement of Industrial Safety Standards Industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate . . . 20 Recordable Injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . 24 filiP_ Reference Number 31

= Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 19 Refueling Outage) . . 48 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects . 49 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . . . .. 50 Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . . . . 52 SEP Reference Number 33

= Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to '99 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date 51 SEP Reference Number 36

= Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) 32 SEP Reference Numbers 41 & 44

• Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule

• Compliance With and Use of Procedures Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance & Preventive Maintenance items Overdue 33 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . 34 SEP Reference Number 46.

Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review 37 60

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX SEP Reference Number 52 P_agn

= Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program . .. .

. 36 SEP Reference Number 54

. Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure 19 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste 21 Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations >1,000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area 25 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . 35 SEP Reference Number 53

= Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Security incidents .

38 SEP Reference Numbers 60 & 61

• Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program

. Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests resulting in Licensee Event Reports . 27 SEP Reference Number 62

. Estabilsh Interim System Engineers Temporary Modrfications .

39 Eng;neering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown .

41 Engineering Change Notice Status . . . 42 Engineering Change Nv. ices Open .

43 SEP Reference Number 68 a

Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Traini g and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requalification Training . . 46 License Candidate Exams . .

47 SEP Reference Number 71 e improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications . . .

39 61

[

Fort Calhoun Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates l EVENT l DATE RANGE l PRODUCTION (MWH) l CUMULATIVE (MWH)  !

[

Cycle 6 06/11/80-09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 f Cycle 7 12/21/81-12/03/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Cycle 8 04/06/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Cycle 9 07/12/84-09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893

[ Cycle 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Cycle 11 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505

{

Cycle 12 01/31/89-02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589.459 Cycle 13 05/29/90-02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040.528 Cycle 14 05/03/92-09/25/93 4,981,485 56,022,013 Cycle 15 11/26/93-02/20/95 5,043,887 61,065,900 Cycle 16 04/14/95-10/05/96 5,566,108 66,632,007

[ Cycle 17 11/25/99-04/01/98 5,183,684 71,815,678

[

CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47p.m.)

Frst Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973

( Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Rur (477 Days) June 8,1987-September 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Prod'Jctive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH-Cycle 13) May 29,1990-February 1,1992 Shortest Refuelirig Outage (52 days) February 20,1995-April 14,1995

{

62

. _ -.___