Text

Performance Indicators for Apr 1998
	ML20248A687
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	04/30/1998
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20248A674	List: LIC-98-0074, Forwards Fort Calhoun Station Apr 1998 Performance Indicators Rept; ML20248A687;
References
	NUDOCS 9806010015
	Download: ML20248A687 (65)
	v • d • e

- - - - - -

I I OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT

'I

,g FORT CALHOUN STATION

!I nw; ~ n,,g:.;s..:(mn. ;; :. ::3_-. .c, .

\ ,....y_, .

S3 _ _.

[ .'.S_ . .' ;; *. '<. ,'?,, ,Nl __

p, ,

a..

l l

.i

_.- g_

i

,. ~ _ "_' . ' .l '.

,' .~ ^ '*

xman

,l .

g -w < -w ll l- .

. ._s g .

I l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS I

l APRIL 1998 I SAFE OPERATIONS ;

g PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE COST EFFECTIVENESS :

I g erna m%>

P

I Table of Contents / Summary eaa TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

. . . 1 MONTHLY

SUMMARY

REPORT .. . . . . 4 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND .. . . . . .. 5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR .. . . 6 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT

SUMMARY

.7 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS . .. .8 WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Unit Capability Factor . . 10 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor .. . 11 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS per 7000 Hours . . 12 High Pressure Safety injection System . . . . 13 Auxiliary Feedwater System . 14 Emergency AC Power System . 15 Thermal Performance . 16 Fuel Reliability Indicator 17 Secondary System Chemistry . . . 18 Collective Radiation Exposure . . . . 19 Industrial Safety Accident Rate . 20 Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste 21 SAFE OPERATIONS Disabling injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate 23 l Recordable injury /lliness Cases Frequency Rate . . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations

> 1,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area . 25 I

1 L___-----------

I Table of Contents / Summary Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . . . 26 Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown . 27 Violation Trend . .. . . . .. . .. . ... 28 GQ1I.

Cents Per Kilowatt Hour . .. 30 DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) . 32 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . 33 Procedural Nonce npliance incidents 34 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . . 35 Radiological Work Practices Program . . 36 Document Review . . .... . . 37 Security incidents 38 Temporary Modifications . . 39 ,

Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown 40 Engineering Change Notices Status part 1 . 41 I Status part 2 Open part 1 Open part 2 . .

42 43 44 Licensed Operator Requalification Training 45 License Candidate Exams . 46 Cycle 18 Refueling Outage MWD Planning Status . . . . . 47 Component Testing Department. Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage 48 Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . 49 l Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability .. . 50 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . 51 l Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECte Added to 1999 Refueling Outage After Freeze 52 l

lI I 2 i

I l Table of Contents / Summary Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning .. .. . .. . .. . . 53 ACTION PLANS. DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX & DISTRIBUTION LIST Action Plans ... . ... ..... . .. ..... .. . . . .. . 55 Performance Indicator Definitions . . . ... . . . . 56 Safety Enhancement Program index .. ..... .... . . .. .... . . .. 61 Current Production and Operations "Racords"/ Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates 63 Report Distribution List . . . .... . ... . . . . . . . ... . 64 I

I I

,I ,

l w _ --- _ _ -- _ --__ _ _- .

FORT CALHOUN STATION Monthly Summary OPERATIONS i Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) main generator was taken off the line on March 31,1998 at 2140 hours0.0248 days 0.594 hours 0.00354 weeks 8.1427e-4 months to l begin the 1998 Outige. On April 1,1998 at 0135 hours0.00156 days 0.0375 hours 2.232143e-4 weeks 5.13675e-5 months the Reactor was sub-critical. FCS was in a refueling outage during the month of April 1998.

l I

i l WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1

The overall WANO Performance Index was 80% during the 1st Quarter of 1998. Significant percentage point losses are attributed to the following WANO Performance Indicators listed below:

l 1. The Unit Capability Factorindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 2.4 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on page 10.

l l 2. The Unplanned Capability Loss FactorIndicator csdculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 6.4 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on pages 10 and 11.

1

3. The Fue/ Reliability Indicator; calculated over the previous 3 months, cor tributed to a 8.0 point loss due to increased reactor coolant activity caused by fuel defects on page 17.

4. The Thermal Performance Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a i 0.9 point loss due to thermal energy losses experienced during reactor power changes and forced outages defined on Pages 10 and 16.

5. The collective Radiation Exposure Indicator; calculated over the previous 24 months, contnbuted to a 1.0 point loss, which was attributed to fuel failures and recent high exposure jobs such as resin shipment and work on AC-7, " Storage Pool Demineralized on page 19.

6. The Emergency AC PowerIndicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 0.6 point loss, which was a result of on-line maintenance and replacement of relays unde,r ECN95-347, l Replace Relays for Seismic Adequacyon page 15.

7. The Chemistry Performance Inder indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 1.4 point loss, which is due to copper tubes in heat exchangers and mechanical shock to systems in the past year from forced outages defined on page 18.

4

- Fort Calhoun Index value

--*- Industry Median Index Value wANo Median is 86.4%

FCS GOAL 90 91.0 --

I a s .s --

86.4 86.4 86.4 86.4 a 6.s -- .:. .:. .:. .:.

l s 4.7 --

l j s2.s --

> s 0.5 --

J~

" '3 j 7s.4 --

y o,o - , r , m . -

97/2 97/3 97/4 98/1 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND The Wano Performance Index Trend calculation is made up of eleven variables, each value is weighted to arrive at an overall index value. WANO calculates the performance Index value based on the industry reporting the information each quarter. The variables are calculated over a defined period of time as listed below.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR WElGHTED FACTOR TIME Unit Capability Factor 16 24 Months Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 24 Months High Pressure Safety injection 10 24 Months Auxiliary Feedwater 10 24 Months Emergency AC Power 10 24 Months Unplanned Auto Scrams /7000 Hours 8 24 Months Collective Radiation Exposure 8 24 Months Thermal Performance Indicator 6 12 Months Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 12 Months industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 12 Months Fuel Reliability Indicator 8 Quarterly 5

]

l 18,00 8 I 16.00 - g EM AXWW vat UE EMM7 E N @ 98 14.00 - N 8 ni 12.00 - 888 888 8 10 00 ~

888 8 I eg.

8

88 ==

8 6 00 - . kbk I I I I i l 1 1 I I I UCF UCLF HPSI AFW EACP CRE UAS7 FRl CPI TPI ISAR WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS I This graph shows the dfference between Fourth Qtr 97 and First Qtr 98 actual values achieved by Fort Calhoun.

i I CALCULATED OVER A 2 YEAR PERIOD MAXIMUM VALUE TREND i

I UCF HPSI Unit Capability Factor UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor High Pressure Safety injection 16 12 10 increase increase No Change AFW Auxiliary Feedwater 10 No Change EACP Emergency AC Power 10 No Change UAS7 Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hours 10 No Change CRE Collective Radiation Exposure 8 No Change CALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD l TPI Thermal Performance Indicator 6 increase

! cpl Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 increase ISAR Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 No Change CALQULATED OVER A QUARTERLY PERIOD FRI Fuel Reliability Indicator 8 Decrecse I

I 1 I

6 1

l l

l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SUMMARY

REPORT POSITIVE TREND REPORT ADVERSE TREND REPORT A performance indcator with data representing three consecutue A Mum.i-@ indcator wth data represenLng three j months of improving performance or three consecutive months of consecutive months of declining performance or three consecutive I performance that is supenor to the stated goal is exhbtng a postue months of performance that is trending toward dechning as determined l trend per Nuclear Operations Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD- by the Manager- Nuclear Licensing. constautes an adverse trend per l OP-37) The fogowing performance indcators exhibned postwe Nuclear Operatons Drvsion Quality Procedure 37 (NOD-QP-37). A trends for the reporting month: supervsor whose performance indicator exhibts an adverse trend by this defintion may specdy in wntion form (to be pubbshed in th1i Unclanned Automatic Reactor Scrams report) why the trend is not adverse.The following performance (Page 12) recators exhbited adverse trends for the reporting month.

Hvah Pressure Safety Iniect!on System Safety System HgDL Performance (Page 13)

Aux Feed Water System Safety System Performance INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT I

(Page 14) ATTENTION REPORT Thermal Performance A Mvm e w indcator wth data for the reporting penod that is (Page 16) Inadequate when compared to the OPPD goal s defined as Needing increased Management Attention"per (NOD-QP-37).

I fantaminated Radinhon Controked Area (Page 35) Maintenance Workload Backloa (Page 32)

Ratro of Preventive to Totaf Mantenance Preventve Maintenance items Overdue (Page 33)

Temocracy MJc. Lone (Page 39)

I I

I l

\

I l 1

I I l I

I I

, . . , . . . ._...I

I I 3 Significant O Noteworthy I 16 -

14 -

12 -

14 g

if 7 <

$ 3 2

I 2-0 3

0 3

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 I INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Noteworthy /Significant events at FCS are classified by INPO to identify precursors to events. There were 0 Noteworthy and 0 Significant Events during the month of April 1998.

I Significant Eventt l None Noteworthy Events:

Event: Containment Hydrogen Panel Components Exceed Qualified Life Due to incorrect Calculation Assumptions, February 26,1998 Environmental qualification thermal aging calculations completed in 1985, used incorrect assumptions when calculating the qualified life of components in two containment hydrogen monitor panels. As a result, the thermal environmental qualification had expired for three solenoid valves in each of the two panels. Both panels were declared inoperable pending replacement of the solenoid valves. The cause of this event was lack of depth in the analysis when the original Equipment Qualification (EO) program assessments that were performed in 1985. This event was NOT I SIGNIFICANT because the incorrect calculations were identi'ied, and the station took prompt corrective action was taken. The event is NOTEWORTHY because an incorrect input assumption was used in a calculation to determine operability of safety monitoring instrumentation which resulted in the equipment exceeding its qualified life by more than eight years.

I Data Source: Tills /Guinn (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Tills /Guinn Trend: None 8

I I

' WANO I

I PERFORMANCE

' INDICATORS I

I I

I l I

1 I C"- 3 Monthly Unit Capability Factor

--*-- 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (87.5%)

--e- 12 Month Unit Capabil Factor

-a- Year 2000 WANO bd try Goal (87%)

00*4

, , , 102.9 % 95.4 % 100.0*A 100 h 100 0 % 100.0 4 100.0 % - 10Q Gt% 88.0 %

a 1 a i 1 ^

1 -

90.0% - . . . . . .

7% . .

I 80.0% - 74.5 % Ar 70.0% -

60.0% -

50.0% - 43.7 %

40.0% -

30.0% -

20.0% -

1998 RFO 10.0% -

0.0%

0.0% - , - , - - - -- - - - - - - - -

m-- - -

m- n >

Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr I UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy generation over the same time period, expressed as a percentage,.

- UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 95.8 % 95.1 % 81.6 % 83.5%

Enerav Losses:

Forced Outage-Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Event Period: September 10, thru13,1997.

Power Reduction- Faculty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Event Period. August 26,28,1997. j l

Forced Outage- Circumferential cracking of a weld down stream of a moisture separator due to high system stresces Event Period: May 28, thru May 29,1997.

I Forced Outage- Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system Event Period: April through mid May 1997.

The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 87.7% and the current industry median value is approximately 83.6%. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 16.00. At the end of the First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 13.6 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 13.5.

I Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report i Accountabihty Chase l Trend: None

, w o

I m Monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor

-+-- 12-Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (3.5%)

- *- Year 2000 WANo industry Goal (3.00%)

I 56 30a/.

60% --

50% --

" 30.50 % 1998 2( 50 % RFO 30% --

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

10'.-~ 0.00 0.0D% 0.D0% 0 00%

0*i. E i i i i , , , , , , , ,

Apr May June July Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR I This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling 12-month average, the Ort 3D goal, and the Year 2000 WANO goal. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy I generation expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not produced as a result of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to causes under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplsnned if they are not scheduled at least four weeks in advance.

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month ,

0% 3.05% 8.6% 7.5%

I The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 3.0% and the industry current best quartile value is approximately 3.2%. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 12.00. At the end of the First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.6 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 5.4.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Chase Trend: None I 11

I I r

-c 12-Month Rolling Average

-+-- FCS Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critical for last 36 months l

I Fort Calhoun Goal (0.0)

-e- Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (1)

-*- FCS Reactor Scrams - 1997-98 2 --

1:- .- = = = = = = = = = =

1998 I 0m May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr I

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL The graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD goal for 1998 I and the Year 2000 WANO goal. Also the graph shows the number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams that occur per 7,000. There were no unplanned automatic I reactor SCRAh8 during the month of April 1998. The 12-month rolling average (May 1907 through April 1998) was 0. An unplanned automatic reactor SCRAM occurred in August 1995; therefore, the 36-month value (May 1995 through April 1998) was 0.346.

The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is a maximum of one unplanned automatic reactor scram g per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 8.0. At the end of the First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 ,

value of 8.0.

I I l

)

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Chase Trend: Positive I

I l 12

l l i i Monthly HPSI System Unavailability Value

--*- 12 Month Rolling Average l

I Fort Calhoun Goal (0.003)

-o- Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (0.02) 0.02 -- e- : : : : : : : : : : :

0.015 --

lg J lu i 0.01 --

0.005 --

0 = , =,=,1 : : ; 1 ' '

= ; 1 ; ;

May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr I

I HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for April 1998.

The HPSI System unavailability value for the month of April 1998 was 0.0. There were 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of planned unavailability, and 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of unplanned unavailability. The 12 month rolling average was (May 1997 through April 1998) was 1.57 X E-5, and the year-to-date HPSI unavailability value was 0.00 x E-4 at the end of the month. For the previous year there was a total of 9.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months of planned unavailability and 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of unplanned unavailability for the HPSI system.

T5e 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.003. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 0.020. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 10.0.The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 10.0.

I i Data Source: Phelps/Schaffer (Manager / Source)

I Accountability:

Trend:

Phelps/Schaffer Positive i

I I

I 13

-e-12 Month AFW Unavailability Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01)

Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (0.020) 0.025 -

0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

0.015 -

0.009 0.002 0 1998 0.005 0.005 - .. ,_. . . - __

ss0 ryo

' O ' '

0 : : : : ,

May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr I

l AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE I This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of April 1998.

The AFW System Unavailability Value for April 1998 was 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months . There were 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of planned and 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month. The l 12 month rolling average (May 1997 through April 1998) was 0.003, and the year-to-date unavailabllity value was 0.002 at the end of April 1998.

l The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.01.

The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 0.020. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 10.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 10.0.

I Data Source: Phelps/Fritts (Manager /Scurce)

Accountability: Phelps/Fritts Trend: Postive 14

Monthly Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value

-e- Year-to-Date Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value T 99.7%. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 99.6%.

l The maximum index point value for this indicator is 6.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.7 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 5.5.

Data Source: Phelps/Naser(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Naser Trend: Positive l

l 16

! Fuel Reliability (E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

-e- Year 2000 WANO Goal (5 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram) a End of 1998 Goal (17.3 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram) 236 250 -- p Ig h 200 --

M 'a 131

! 150 -

$ 100 -- 1998 RFO 50 --

uJ 0

l i

O- ,- - r- , , , i , , H Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR I The monthly Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRl) for April 1998 was Not Reportable due to the 1998 RFO. The purpose of the FRI is to monitor industry progress in achieving and maintaining a high level of fuel integrity. An effective fuel integrity and performance monitoring program provides a means to detect fuel failures and assess the fuel failure number, physical condition, exposure, mechanism, and location.

I Westinghouse was selected to provide failed fuelinspection services consisting of sipping ann ultrasonic testing. As of the end of April the task had not been completed.

The maximum index point value for this indicator is 8.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value l was 0.0 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 vai.ie of 0.3. l Data Source: Guinn/Roenigk (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Stafford Trend: Adverse 17 I

I I

i 1

2.43 2.5 -

L 2-- .yf l

W p:?

q 1.5 - , 3, 1.32 j 1 m J K m

%;j !

a-1.05 1.1 11 m

11 1 04 3 ? Nj % ,

@ Y p y @ J [ ( % $ 3,,,

0.5 ] i;[Iy . $h RFo

] h) [."g 0 May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr I SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY Steady state plant conditons required for calculating the Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) are as follows:

Plant in Refueling Outage.

No CPI Determination The CPI for April 1998 is 0.00. The CPI value for the past 12 months (May 1997 through April 1998) was 1.30 The CPI value in the industry's upper quartile is 1.17. Six parameters are used in the CFI calculation. Four of the parameters were below the WANO mean value which are as follows: 1) steam generator chloride, 2) sulfate, 3) feedwater iron, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. Slight increase in CPI observed this month due to power reduction for work on Stator Cooling Heat Exchangers. Morpholine injection began this month for iron reduction. Results of analysis are inconclusive at this time. Trending continues.

The maximum index point value for this indicator is 7.00. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.60 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 5.0.

I .

l l

l Data Source: Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Hamilton I Trend: None 1

I 18

\

l 1 l

m M o nt hly P e r so n nel R a dia tion E x p o s ure(E D)

Q CRE Pe r sonnelBased on TLD QTRS CRE Based on ED Reading

-FCS Goal 224 REM 1

5 25 160 - 0 140 -

T5 120 -

100 -

125 " 80 -

o -

3 . g e- , - g z.. 20 - g u

n. 0 - - = - .

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul sug Sep Oct Nov Dec 25 1 2 3 4 l

CULLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE The 1998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhoun Station was c:tablished for a Total Dose of 224.0 person-rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are

)

l obtained. The exposure for April 1998 was 142.228 Person-rem (ED).

1 I

Dose FCS Goal

) Person- First Ott. Second Third Otr. Fourth Otr.

l Rem Otr.

Total 224.0 15.302 Person-Rem l

The total 3 year CRE value, from the First Quarter 1996 through the Fourth Quarter of 1997, was 405.090 Person-Rem which averages out to 135.030 Person-Rem per year. The Year l 2000 WANO industry goal for Collective Radiation Exposure is 107 person-rem per year. The )

maximum index point value for this indicator is 8.00. The First Quarter 1997 the FCS CRE Vclue was 7.0 compared to the Fourth Quarter 1997 CRE Value of 7.0.

l Data Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP 54 19 I

r

--o-- Monthly industrial Accident Rate

-e- 12 Month Rolling Average PCS Year End Goal (<0.40)

( --e-- Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (<0.40)

! 1.2 --

l 1.1 -- '

1--

8:1::

0.7 --

U-0.4 c 0.3 --

4 4 a a a, v. A N u o 0.2 O.1 !A - - - -

0: $ 5 E E E -N-: : -

! May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDEl4T RATE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in the indicator. This indicator is defined as the number of accidents per 200,000 work-hours worked for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station that result in any of l following:

- one or more days of restricted work (excluding the day of the accident.)

- One er more days away from work (excluding the day of the accident.)

Fatalities.

ISAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fatalities) x 200.000 (number of station person-hours worked)

I The Fort Calhoun Station industrial safety accident rate at the end of April 1998 was 0.43. The 12 month rolling average (May 1997 through April 1998) was 0. The year to date value was 1 at the end of April 1998.There was no restricted-time and no lost-time accident in April 1998. The 1099 Fort Calhoun year-end goalis 50.40. The Year 2000 WANO industry goalis 50.40.

The maximum index point value for this indicator is 5.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.0 which comparas to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 5.0.

Data Source: Sorensen/Blumenthcl (Manager / Source)

Chase / Booth (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Short ,

Trend: Positive )

1 20

a Monthly Volume of LLRW(cu.ft.)

E Year-to-Date Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried l

300 --

200 --

i w

8 g s, =

I 3 8

uu

~ ~

100 --

S N

E

" ?

I 0 i I l l l 1 I l I l 1 l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Je. Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator shows the volume of the monthly Radioactive Waste buried and the cumulative year-to-date radioactive waste buried. The Fort Calhoun goalis 800 cu.ft.

3 Ft m8 Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during current month : 2080.0 588.64 Volume of solid radwaste buried during April 1998 : 1.5 0.43 Cumulative volume of sol!d radioactive waste buried in 1998 : 148.8 42.11 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage : 00.0 0.00 The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 30 cubic meters (1,071 cubic feet) per year. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 27.33 cubic meters (965.3 cubic feet) per year.

l Data Source: Chase /Breuer (Manager / Source)

I Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP 54 I

I n

i !

i I

I I

I

' SAFE OPERATIONS '

I I

g Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear organization.

g Individuals demonstrate professionalism through self-ownership and personalinitiative and open l communication.

I I

22

I a Monthly Disabling injury /i!! ness Frequency Rate 1998 F.C.S. Goal (0.4) 2-

> 1.6 -

l 1.2 -

0.8 - 0.63 7" 0.43 0.4 -

O O 0

,I Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the April 1998 Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate. For the I month of April 1998 the disabling injury / illness frequency rate was 0.43. There were no disabling injury / illness case (s) reported for April 1998.

I The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.4.

Data Source: Sorensen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP 25,26 & 27 I

I 23

I Monthly Recordable injury /fliness Frequency Rate

-+- 1998 Fort Calhoun YTD Goal (1.5) 3-2.5 -

2 1.5 -- 0 0 : : : : : : : : : 0 1-0.5 -

0 0 0 I O Jan i

Feb i

Mar i

Apr i

May i

Jun i

Jul i

Aug i

Sep i

Oct I

Nov i

Dec i

l RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly Recordable Injury / Illness Frequency Rate. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if personnel from any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid.

l The recordable injury / illness case numbers for the month of April 1998 was none. The 1998 '

Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.

l Data Source: Sorensen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gebers Trend: None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 I

I 24

3 Contamination Events (Monthly)

O Contamination Events (YTD) 45 -

4o .

35 -

I So - q 25 23 l

o_ -

15 I

15 -

l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep oct Nov Dec I CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS 2.1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for contaminations >1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for April 1998.

There were 9 personnel contamination events in April 1998. The total year-to-date of Personnel events is 32 at the end of April 1998.

I Data Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)

I Accountability : Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 25 I

35

+MI Events 30

-e-- Preventable 18 Month Totals

~: A >

25 - --*_. Pe rsonel Error 20 I

10 g"? N .

J.

N] _{ }#-

0 Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar. Apr- May- Jun- Juk97 Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar-96 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 96 98 PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs I This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs.

The graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnel Error LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the LER event date as opposed to the LER report date.

In March 1998, there were no events which was subsequently reported as LERs. No LERs were categorized as " Preventable" and No LERs were categorized as " Personnel Error" during th e month of March. The total LERs for the year 1998 are two. The total Personnel Error LERs for the year 1998 are zero.

The year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values for the 18-month totals not to exceed 5 Fieventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs.

l NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.

I Data Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase Trend: None SEP 15 26 l

(

Mac 10%

i Admin l 9 7',,, 28 %

@ .h :

~

N.

A[9 '

'ii f l:h ;O? _

'b

.. b I Des @n 31 %

h ,.h Lo Err.

14 %

Maint- Other Err.

'% 10%

I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by event date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past eighteen months from October 1,1996, through March 31,1998. To be consistent with the Preventable / Personnel Error LERs indicator, this indicator is reported by the LER event date, as opposed to the LER report date.

The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.

I NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-month behind.

There were no events in March 1998 that resulted in LEFW,. There were no missed surveillance tests resulting in LERs during March 1998. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal E for this indicator is 0.

Data Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 27

I

- Gyv't M v c. bdi

M'/ -

1 j

{

- cun -

SNP SALP m FCSChadMaintions(Idonthly) m FCSNonchedViolat6onsM)

o 9

B - 13 g _l : ,

o a a 2-- ,

1 - 7 E U~ -

E l 8- ;

a E 8~ E

s. e.-

, 7 ,

E E g 4_ E. -

3

= mE EE E 2- E- d~ '

" 2 M =-

o

,E.E g' g' [

2 o

f J

i 1 o

j .

E

.E . J E.M. .m. ,

ig 2 , rj g_ May Jun .U Aug Sep Od h Dec Jan Fet Wr 5

.5 3 .} -

l v:OLATION TREND This indicator depicts twelve months of violation data for Fort Calhoun Station. Illustrated monthly are Cited Violations and Non-Cited Violations. The current SALP cycle began on August 3,1997 and ends on January 30,1999.

The following inspection reports noting violations were received during April 1998:

Violation Level IER No. Title IV (1) NCV (3) 98-05 Resident inspection (4/22/98)

IV (1) NCV (4) 98-06 Radiation Protection (4/30/98)

To date, OPPD has received thirty six violations for inspections completed in the current SALP cycle. Two (2) of the Level IV Violations received in August 1998 were carried over from the prsvious SALP cycle due to a lag in the reporting process.

Levellli Violations 1 Level IV Violations 17 Non-Cited Violations 18 Total 36 The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the top quartile plants in Region IV.

Data Source: Tills /Cavanaugh (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Tills Trend: None 28

i I

I I

' COST I

Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that cost I effectively maintains nuclear generation as an economically viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line.

I Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the organization.

I I

l I

I

'I I

I o_

12 Month Rolling Average

. Actua! -e- Budget -e- Plan 3.50 -

3.00 -

= .-

f. = = =

2.00 -

1.60 -

1.00 lI ///////////////// * * *

I CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR l March 1998 The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved 1998 revised budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report.

I The Decerr.ber 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1993 through 1997. In addition, the report shows the plan amounts for the years 1999 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the Nuclear Long Range Financial Plan and the 1998 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels.

The 12-rnonth rolling average unit price period of ( April 1997 through March 1998) averaged above the budget due to 12-month rolling expenses exceeding the budget and the 12 month budgeted generation also exceeding the budget. The 12 month rolling average (04/97 through 03/98) is 2.83 cents per kilowatt hour.

The year to-date average is trending in a positive direction.

Cents ner KWH Jan Feb Mar Aor May Jun Jul Auo Sen Oct Nov Dec Budget Y-T-D 3.02 2.85 3.17 4.03 3.72 3.46 3.29 3.13 3.03 2.99 2.92 2.87 Actual Y-T-D 2.96 2.85 3.00 NOTE: This information lags by a month due to the short tum around rer jired for processing.

I Data Source: Belek/Howell(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Belek Trend: None 30 l

i I

i i '

s DIVISION AND

' DEPARTMENT

' PERFORMANCE i

i INDICATORS i Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station l resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power )

production.

l l

I I

31 l.

I l

m Corrective Maintenance m Preventive Maintenance Non. Corrective /Pla nt im provenwnts Fort Calhoun Goal (200)

May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr g

g Non-Outage Maintenance Work Document Backlog a ToldhMOs PERCENT OF MWD's PAST GOAL BY PRIORrIY E PRI.2 PRI.3 500- 0% 89.7 %

400 .

300--

I 200

'j" 0

0

,m, 116 9j um , PRi . 4 PR 1 Ruty1 Raty2 Raty 3 Ruty4 Ruty 5 MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month. It also includes a breakdown by maintenance classification and priority. The 1998 goal for this indicator is 200 non-outage corrective maintenance MWDs.

The current backlog of corrective MWDs is 319 to ensure that the MWD backlog is worked in a timely manner, non-outage maintenance completion goals have been established as follows:

I Priority 1

=

24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months Priority 2 7 days I Priority 3 Priority 4 30 days 90 days As resources permit I Priority 5 The Corrective Maintenance workload backlog goalis 200 for 1998.

Data Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 36 I

32 I

[ Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance l

100 % . 90%

77% 79 % 79 %

74 % 74 % 76 % 75 % 75 % 74 %

80 % ft 7 7 7

~

Y 7 7 "

61 %

{y ga w;g y 52 % &

60%

e u

,,, ,d 9 M

1-l q

4 w

y

-j l

40% N Q {q ; j 7 [q f {m s . , . .

'{~ p e .-_. m{

),, $ M 20% &.. s (p

h lb 4 f,T- & E M

"l @j R .b' p g g'j $

0% ' 4' May June Jiy Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Preventive Maintenance items overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2%

7% --

6.02%

6% -- 6.60 %

6% --

4.09% 4.01 %

4% ~_

2.60 % ' '

3% -- 2.40%

2% -- -

1% - 0.66% 0.30 %

0.20 %

0% l

" i"I i i i i i i i I I May June J uly Aug sep oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE )

i' The top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 74% for the month of April 1998.

The lower grap;. shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that were not completed by the late finish date. From the period of March 15th thru April 15th there wsre 19 PMk that were completed late or not completed out of 463 scheduled. l The 1998 Fort Calhour monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items j overdue is a maximum of 2%. !

D:ta Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 41 & 44 .

l 33

Human Performance CRs (Maintenance) 2 0 --

18 --

16 16 --

g 14 --

12 --

! A y 10 --

o o 8--

l 6 I

Z 6--

4-- 3 2-- 1 1 1 0 i i i i i i i I "l l I l May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of Condition Reports related to procedural noncompliance incidents assigned to the Maintenance Department.

The numbers for each of the past 12 months have been revised from last months report. This I revision became necessary when it was realized the data provided by the Corrective Action Group was not accurate for the title of the graph. Previous numbers reflected the number of Administrative Events, which is not necessarily the number of Procedure Noncompliance Events. The revised data now indicates the number of Level 1-5 CRs for Operating Manual Procedure Noncompliance Events committed by the Maintenance Department.

Additional Note: Work Group coding can be changed when the cause of the CR is identified by the CR Owner. Since the cause may not be determined for up to 45 days (Level 4) this can produce changing numbers in the indicator.

Data Source: Clcmens/Burggraf (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 34

m Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (5%)

6% --

I 5% - 48% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8%

I ,% ..

3% --

2% --

I ,% -

0% 1 I i 1

! I I I I i l 1

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I

CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA I This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that is contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of April 1998, the total contaminated area was 3383 square feet which is 4.8 percent of the RCA . The monthly FCS goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area.

I Data Source:

Accountability:

Trend:

Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)

Chase /Gebers Positive SEP54 1

,l 35 t

7 m Monthly Poor Radiation Worker Practices m Total PRWP for 1998 I

1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (<20) 25 20 15 13 10 l

5 33 3 3 0 i i i i e i i i t - i i i Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug sep Oct Nov Dec RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological ,

Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. l The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. This I indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 month increasing trend of poor radiation worker practices based on YTD.

During the month of April, there was 10 PRWP identified.

g There have been a total of 13 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998.

I The 1998 FCS goal is <20 PRWPs, the 1997 goal was <15 PRWPs.

I l Data Source:

Accountability:

Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)

Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP52 I

36

E Docum e nts Scheduled for Review 3 Docum e nt Reviews complete during m onth l

D Documents Overdue l 300 --

250 -- l 4 4 + - -

H May June J uly Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr 1997-1998 l DOCUMENT REVIEW

)

The Document Review indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue I (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.

The documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the I Operating Manual.

During April 1990, there were 134 document reviews scheduled, while 50._., ews were I completed. At the end of the month, there were 42 document reviews more than 6 months overdue. There were 0 new documents initiated during April 1998.

I I Data Source: Ponec/Plath (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Ponec Trend: None SEP 46 I

I 37 L__--_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

35 30 25 20' I 15

~

10

[

5 l j I l JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG sEP oCT NoV DEC 98 Loggables 98 Non-Loggables

= 97 Loggables : 97 Non-Loggables SECURITY INCIDENTS I The Loggable and Non-Loggable incident (Security) Indicators are depicted on the chart above, it depicts the total number of loggable and non-loggable human error events, system failures and access denials which occurred during the reporting month.

During April, there were 26 loggable incidents and 10 non-loggable incidents identified (excluding access denials). 81% of allincidents were human error events. 23% percent of all l

l incidents were access denials. Of loggable events, 58% were human performance errors and 42% were system failures. 45% of the loggable system failures were environmental. There were twenty-one (21) human error events, seven (7) being internal. There were five (5) security force error events during the reporting period, none of which were loggable. They consisted of:

two (2) personnel allowed in containment without their TLDs, one misissuance of a visitor pass, i

g a lock and chain improperly installed on gate 1 and an unattended badge left in the AAP after g hours. Human error events continue to be an organizational focus.

This indicator provides information ori security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58.

Data Source: Sefick/ Clark (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Trend: None SEP 58 38

(

l l

I m Temporary Modtrcations >1-fuel cycle old (RFO required for removal) m Temporary Modifications >6 months old (Removable on-line)

- Fort Calhoun Goals for both Temporary Modircations' categories 3.5-3 3-2.5 -

2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 i 0 May June H-l-li-=ikil July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr I

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the number of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater than one fuel cycle old requinng a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of TMs removaole on-line that are greater than six months old. The 1908 Fort Calhoun monthly goals for both of the TM categories are zero.

At the end of April 1998, there were two (2) TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for removal. TM 96-014, Reactor Coolant Gas Vent Line Pressure High Alarm, was installed April 22,1996. Repairs for this TM were completed during the 1996 RFO, but the reactor coolant gas vent line pressure is still high. MR-FC 011 was initiated to solve this problem and currently DEN is planning the modification. MR-FC-97-011 is expected to be completed during the 1998 RFO. TM 96-018 Equipment Drain Header Soft Rubber Patch was installed June 16, 1996. MWO 963468 has been written to replace the piping and is currently scheduled for the 1998 RFO.

At the end of April 1998, there was one (1) TM installed that was greater than six months old that could be removed on-line. TM 96-039, Railroad Siding / Corridor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996. EAR 97-219 will close this TM. EAR 97-219 requires Component Testing review and approval. EAR 97-219 is expected to be completed by May 1,1998.

At the end of April 1998, there was a total of twenty (20) TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. Thirteen (13) of the twenty (20) installed TMs require an RFO for removal and seven (7) are removable on-line. In 1998, a total of ten (10) TMs have been installed. At the end of April 1998, there were twelvo (12) procedural or maintenance configuration alterations (PMCAs) (a special classification of TM) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station using PRC approved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order O-25.

I Data Source: Phelps/ Frank (Manager / Source)

Accountability- Phelps/ Core Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 62&/1 I

39

I 80 -- EARS Requiring Engineering Closeout Not in Closecut a SE a DEN 40 -

33 i

0 i i i i i I i i i i i i i i Mar Apr Feb Mar Apr I

Feb Mar Apr Feb M ar Apr Feb 0 3 M onths 3-6 Months 6-12 M onths >12 Months O Engineering Response B Closeout (SE)

I 20 - '8 1

-l 9 g

, . r

. . I lo .

r,' .

o Priority 0 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 6 Priority 6 closeost 8 5 E ^ " se s C h e d W la Repanaes 01 4" 33.6%

"'::" oL.

l n:::'

ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering and System Engineering. The 1998 year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum of 120 outstanding EARS.

The Total EAR breakdown is as follows:

EARS opened during the month 11 I EARS closed during the month 29 Total EARr open at the end of the month 107 Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phetps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 I

40

I 43 99 6

77 aCMM M onth s y e 9% Months 17.0%

26 cEr .%

l3 I

ECN STATUS-OVERALL BACKLOG -

d1 3 Backlogged D Recehed a CcnT@tj ,,3

"'"'h' 150 -112 102 100 99 41% 8 92 86 6

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr DESIGN ENGINEERING 1

m Backlogged a Received 0 Completed 86 M 8.6%

90 - 80 74 74 70 69 h 0- , , , , , ,

g;

" Nov Dec Jan Fe b M ar Apr SYSTEM ENGINEERING ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS i

Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Trend: None SEP62 I

41

I E Bddosped a Rcahd E Cmipisted 20 10 237 m M M 2s0 227 228 242 220 2

Ptw [hc .kn Feb ler Apr PROCUREMENT / CONSTRUCTION 80 - B W M DReamd a Compisted I 99 7 60 - 44 M Months 34 Months 39 43 38 34 36 16.3 %

25.6 %

4 2, ,y 0

4 Months Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 58.1 %

I I '

DRAFTING / CLOSEOUT I , '

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS I

I I

Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source) l 1 l Accountability:

Trend:

Jaworski/Phelps None SEP62 I

I c

I I

86 99 81 104 l DC TYPE 19 %

F C TYPE 22 /o Priority S&6 Priority 1&2 18% 23%

l +CllSP Total Open ECNs = 453

t 59 %

is T o t a l O p e n E C N s = 4 53

! E DEN - Closeout or Drafting Not Complete g a Maintenance / Construction / Procurement-WorkNotComplete y E System Engineering - Response, Confirmation Not Complete g j E DEN - Engineering Not Complete g,j 26 39 17 12 16 23 20 46 45 42 38 41 43 W =s

+

I O l l l l l Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Facility Change ECNs Open ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN I

I Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager Source)

Accountability:

I Trend:

Phelps/Jaworski None SEP62 I 43 I

I I

Substitute Replacement item ECNs Open llfy-g@'EE==:

, Total FC ECNs Open 4

ze 255 258 263 262 jy, 249 go4 182 185 187 98 207 o so . 30 27 27 27 28 25 35 38 26 27 3 y Nov-97 Dec-97 Jan-98 Feb 98 Mar-98 Apr-98 Document Change ECNs Open I D [IN- Cbeeout or DraRrv ?a Jot Complete a SymmErgreenrg Response,Cm'ammonNotCompiele 3

6 P&dy

' fd o Wcopen 75/.

is is

,, ,, 3, i :I,I I I I Nov the .len Feb Mar I:

Apr

+sis %

l I

l ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN l Data Source:

Accountability:

Jaworski/Livingston (Manager Source)

Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 I o

I D Total Requalification Training Hours E SimulatorTraining Hours I E Non-Requalification Training Hours E Number of Exam Failures 40 -

I 35 -

30 -

33 33 31 31

~

32 2 I I 25 -

20 18 I 15 - 4 2

0 14 12 2 8

10 -

I 5-g g ag a 6

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l

0-- i Cycle 971 Cycle 97-2 Cycle 97 3 Cycle 97-4 Cycle 97 5 Cycle 97-6 Cycle 97 7 Cycle 981 I

LICENSED OPERATOR REQUAllFICATION TRAINING g

This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle.

I The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade Safety Meetings, and Division Mancger lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

I Note: Rotation 97-6 was the Annual Licensed Operator Requalification Examination rotation for 1997. There were Three (3) individual and one (1) crew simulator exam failures during rotation 97-6. All remediations were completed I prior to the end of the exam week.

Data Source: Conner /Guliani(Manager / Source)

Accountability- Conner /Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 45 ;

l 5 SRO Exams Administered 5 SRO Exams Passed O RO Exams Administered O RO Exams Passed j 10 --

l l

77 I

l l

! 0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0 I I I I i 1 i i i i l i May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 1998 This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operstor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month (' April 1998, there were no (SRO) or (RO) training classes in session. The next license class is scheduled to begin in July,1998.

Data Source: Conner /Guliani(Manager / Source)

Accountability- Conner /Guliani Trend: None SEP68 46

a n. dy to wom miotal outag' MWD H]t.DS S#sm 8:Ns

u. BWneerin9 Parts We uno . 8% 8%

ua. - h f*sv-97 Deo07 Jan-98 Foo-98 Mar-98 Apr-98 MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage. This graph indicates:

- Parts Holds - Planning Complete, Awaiting Parts

- System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering input to Picnning

- Planner Holds - Meinienance Planner has not completed planning the work package.

i l - ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacement items ECN from DEN.

- ln Review - Planning Complete trNating SE, ISI and OC review.

I l

Data Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase / Herman Trend: None SEP 31 47

l l 3LAST DmlS O FOR SCHEDULE 100 -- m 8 a g- E g -

90 - E N E E 80 -- R 70 --

3 60 -- (

50 --

40 --

30 --

20 --

10 --

5 ? o h5 b?

! Ik IE l $

!! !! b "-

!2 iT>

i :

m ii !

COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1998 0UTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT Data Source Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter Trend: None SEP 31 48 l -. .. ._______

M AINTEN ANCE RULE UN AVAILABILITY PERFORM ANCE suz38S8Ce Exceeding Oneveilability Criter C::::::lt $8Cs Monitored

--*- % Exceedeng Ur.avedtebsitty Critena 70----------- -----------------------------------------------------------~~14.0%

60 - 12 0 %

\ -

y _

j ., -

7 '

g,,

20 ~ 4 0%

,o . \ '

p / .,os M ~

~

oos 3-96 4 96 1 97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1 08 QTR I

Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability

{

This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Unavailability Performance value which is l based on the performance of SSG which have specific Availability Performance Criteria. The percentage of SSG which are exceeding their unavailability performance criteria is 3.2%. This value has trended upward slightly during the first quarter of 1998 due to unavailability problems with l Control Room Ventilation Fan, VA-46A.

Data Source Phelps/Swearngin/ Johnson (Manager / Source) ;

Accountability: Phelps l Trend: None

I l

1 i

49 l

MAINTENANCE RULE SSC RELIABILITY PERFORMANCE MTotal Failures (C, D, F) c::::3Mamtenance Preventable Failures --*--Percent Maintenance Preventable 140 70.0 %

120 - -- 60.0%

100 93 -- 50.0%

h so -- 40.0%

I

60 40 57 58 33 87 43 43

-- 30.0%

-- 20.0% -

> 16 20 -- 10.0%

0- ' - -

I t - '

- + t t l

-C.0%

3-96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 I QTR I

Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability I This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Reliabilty Performance value which is based on tracking being compiled based on component failures since 10CFR50.65 was implemented in l July of 1996. The percent of " Maintenance Preventable" failures is 37% at the end of the first quarter of 1998.

I The Reliability Indicator for the first quarter of 1998 shows that the percentage of failures identified as " Maintenance Preventable"is trending downward, as well as the total number of equipment failures.

I Data Source Phelps/Swearngin/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps Trend: None l

I 50

I l

l

+ ActualFRCDie a Target FRCDie I 6/1593-S M 99 5699-4/16S9 <

s a a a a a a a a a a a 3/7S9 - I gg . , , , , . . . . . .

b "

b S 8 8 5 8 S O X 9 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 2 8 8 m o m $ m a m o e a PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS l CYCLE 19 This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 19 l Refueling Outage (September 1999).

The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were identified prior to March l 31,1998, PRC approved by March 18,1999.

April 1998 Modifications added: 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 1

I 51

)

t I

I I

I I NO DATA AVAILABLE I

I I

l PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND ECNS ADDED TO 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ECNs approved for installation l during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their target date.

I April 1998 Modifications /ECit Added = 0 Deleted = 0 I

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gamohir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 33 I

I , 52

\

. Actual PRC Date a Target PRC Date 7/30/98 - a 6/30/98 - e a 5/31/98 -

S/1/98 -

4/1/98 -

3/2/98 -

1/31/98 e m eee I PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING l This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.

The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their scheduled date.

April 1998 Modifications Added: 0 Deleted: 0 I

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Garnbhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 l

53

I I

I .

I 4 I ACTION PLANS i SEP INDEX &

I DISTRIBUTION l

I LIST I

I II

I ll I

I u

I ACTION PLANS l

This section lists action plans that have been developed for the performance indicators cited as Adverse Trends during the month preceding this report. Also included are Action Plans for indicators that have been cited in the preceding month's report as Needing Increased Management Attention for three (3) consecutive months.

In accordance with Revision 5 of NOD-OP-37, the following performance indicators would require action plans based on three (3) consecutive months of performance cited as 1 "Needing increased Management Attention":

I I

I I 55

i PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX This indicator inder is esiculated from a weighted 4) Critical means that Gring the steady-state combination of eleven performance indicator values, condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the which include the following: Unit Capability Factor, effective multipheation (k ,, )was essentially Unplanned Capability Loss Factor, HPSI, AFW, equal to one Emergency AC Power System, Unplanned Automatic ( Page 11)

Scrams, Conective Radiaton Exposure, Fuel Reliability, Thermal Performance, Secondary System Chemistry, and HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM Industnal Safety Accident Rate. SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

( Page 6 )

The sum of the known (planned and unplanned)

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR unavailable hours and the estimated unavaDable hours for the high pressure safety injection system for the reporting The rate of the available energy generation over a given period divided by the entical hours for the reporting period time period to the reference energy generation (the multiplied by the number of trains in the high pressure energy that could be produced if the unit were operated safety injection system.

continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE - INPO percentage. ( Page 9 )

This indicator is defined as the number of accidents per E UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR 200,000 man-hours worked for aD utility personnel p'rm*n'at'y a$$ ion'd to th' $tation that r*5u't in any of E The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given the following:

period of time, to the reference energy generation (the I energy that could be produced if the unst were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time penod, expressed as a 1) 2)

One or more days of restricted work (excluding the day of the accident);

One or more days away from work (excluding percentage. ( Page 10 ) the day of the accident); and I UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS

3) Fatalities.

Contractor personnel are not included for this indicator.

(Page 12 )

This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM automatic scrams (RPS logic actuations) that occur per PERFORMANCE 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of critical operation.

I The value for this indicator is calculated by multiplying the total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams in a The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for the auxiliary feedwater system for the reporting penod specific time penod by 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months , then dividing that divided by the crrtical hours for the reportng period I number by the total number of hours entical in the same tme period. The indicator is further defined as foDows:

multiphed by the number of trains in the auxiliary feedwater system ( Page 13 )

1) Unplanned means that the scram was not an EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY anticipated part of a planned test. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) reactor by a rapid insertion of negatve reactivity unavaDable and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the (e g , by control rods, liquid injection system, emergency AC power system for the reporting period etc.)that is caused by actuation of the reactor divided by the number of hours in the reporting period protection system. The signal may have resulted multiplied by the number of trains in the emergency AC from exceeding a set point or spurious, power system ( Page 14 )

3) Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protecten THERMAL PERFORMANCE system logic was provided from one of the I sensod monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches or, manual turbine trip switches (or The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 15 )

push-buttons) provided in the main control

'I room.

56

E ,

l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX l FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state pomary contractors and visitors) during a time period, as coolant 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium measured by the thermolumines.cnt dosimeter (TLD).

contnbution and normalized to a common punfication Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposried on person-rem. This indicator tracks radclogical work reactor core intemels from previous defective fuel or is performance for SEP #54.

present on the surface of fuel elements from the ( Page 19 )

manufacturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous operaton for at least three days at a power INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE

, level that does not vary more than + or -5%. Plants should collect data for this indicator at a power level The r urpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in above 85%, when possible. Plants that did not operate at improving industnal safety performance for utility steady-state power above 85% should collect data for this personnel permanently assigned to the station.

mdicator at the ly1 hest steady-state power level attained Contractor work-hours are nc4 induded in this indicator.

during the montt (Page 20 )

Failure Cause Categones are:

The density correction factor is the ratio of the specific volume nf coolant at the RCS operating temperature (540 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE I degrees F., Vf = 0.0217) divided by the specific volume of coolant at normal letdown temperature (120' F at outlet of the letdown cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163),

WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid I which results in a density correction factor for FCS equal radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This to 1.33 ( Page 16 ) indicator also shows the volume of low-level radioactive waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE radioactive oil that has been shipped off-site for I INDEX The Chemistry Performance index (CPI) is a calculation processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste which has been shipped off-site for processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry actrve waste, hased on the concentration of key impurities in the sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a secondary side of the plant. These key impunties are the result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance.

most likely cause of detenoration of the steam generators. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated rags.

Cnteria for calculating the CPI are: cleaning matenals, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a

1) The nbnt is at greater than 30 percent power and low 4evel radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, j sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all

2) tf e po3r is changing less than 5% per day. radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological The CPI is calculated using the Mowing equation: work performance for SEP #54. ( Page 21 )

CPI = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chionde/1.52) +(Sulfate /1.44) + DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (Iron /3.30) + (Copper /0.30)+(Condensate 02/2.90))/6 (LOSS TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

Where: Sodium, sulfate, chloride an condensate This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all dissolved utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200.000 man-hours oxygen are the monthly average blowdown worked (100 man-years) This does not indude concentrations in ppb, iron and copper are monthly time contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel weighted average feedwater concentrations in ppb. The performance for SEP #25,26 & 27. (Page 23 )

denominator for eaof the five factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly average for a specific parameter is RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES less than the INPO med;an value, the median value is FREQUENCY RATE used in the calculation.

( Page 17 ) The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 man-hours worked This indicator trends COLLECTb " RADIATION EXPOSURE personnel performance for SEP #15,25 and 26.

( Page 24 )

Collective radiation exposure is the total extemal whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel (including 57

f I

l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX I CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS 1 1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE 4) Maintenance Problem - The intent of +his i

AREA cause code is to capture the fun range of problems which can be attrityJted in any l

The personnel contamination events in the clean way to programmatic deficiencies in the l controlied area This indicator tracks personnel maintenance functional organization.

performance for SEP #15 & 54. ( Page 25 ) Activities included in this category are maintenance, testing, surveillance, PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs calibration and radiation protection.

l Thrs indicator is a breakdown of LERs For purposes cf LER 5) Design / Construction / Installation / Fabric event dassifcation, a

Preventable LER*is defined as- ation Problem - This cause code covers a fuu range of programmatic deficiencies in i

An event for whch the root cause a personnel error (i e., the areas of design, construction, inappropnate action by one or more individuals), inadequate instaRation, and fabncation (i.e., loss of admnstratsve contrds, a desgn construction, installation, control power due to underrated fuse, l hataRaton, fabncaton problem (irwolving work completed by or equipment not qualifed for the supervised by OPPD personnel) or a maintenance problem environment, etc.).

I (attrbuted to inadequate or irnproper upkeephopair of plant equement) Also, the cause of the event must have occurred within approximately two years of the " Event Date" specified in

6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece-Parts or Environmental-Related the LER (e g., an event for whch the cause is attributed to a Failures) - This code is used for spurious prob 6em with the onginal desqq of the plant would not be failures of electronic piece-parts and failures cons.dered preventable). due to meteorological conditions such as hghtning, ice, high winds, etc. Generally, it I For purposes of LER event classification. a " Personnel Errota LER is defined as follows:

includes spurious or one-time failures.

Electric components included in this category are circuit cards, rectifiers, An event for which the root cause is inappropnate acton on the bestables, fuses, capacitors, diodes, part of one or more Indivgfuals (as opposed to being attrbuted resistors, etc.

to a department or a general group). A!so. the inappropnate in addition this indicator reports SEP # 6 &

acton must have occurred within approximately two years of 61. (Page 27) the "Ehent Date" specifed in the LER. Additionally, each event classified as a " Personnel Error" should also be VIOLATION TREND this indicator is defined as Fort classrfied as " Preventable." This indicator trends Calhoun Station Cited Violations and Non-Crted personnel performance for SEP ltem #15. ( Page 26 ) Volations trended over 12 months. Additionally, CitedViolations for the top quartile Region IV plant LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE istrended over 12 months (lagging the Fort BREAKDOWN CalhounStation trend by 2-3 months). It is the FortCathoun Station goal to be at or below the cited This indicator shows the number and root cause code for volation trend for thetopquartileRegion IV plant.

Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as ( Page 28 )

fonows:

CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR I 1) Administrative Control Problem -

Management and supervisory deficiencies that affect plant programs or actrvities (i e.,

The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the econorqical operation cf Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per kilowatt poor planning, breakdown or lack of hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per adequate management or supervisory kilowatt hour on a twelve-month average for the current control. incorrect procedures, etc). year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved yearty budget. The basis for the actual curve is the

2) Licensed Operator Error - This cause Financial and Operating Report.

code captures errors of ( Page 30 )

omission / commission by licensed reactor operators during plant activities.

3) Other Personnel Error Errors of omission / commission committed by non-heensed personnelinvolved in plant I actrvttes.

58

1 l

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX l MAINTENANCE. WORKLOAD BACKLOGS PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the The number of identified incidents conceming end of the reporting month, Maintenance classrficatons maintenance procedural problems, the number of closed are defined as follows: irs related to the use of procedures (includes the number of closed irs caused by procedural noncompliance), and Corrective Repair and restoration of equipment or the number of closed procedural noncompliance irs.

components that have failed or are malfunctioning and This indcator trends personnel performance for SEP are not performing their intended function. #15,41 and 44. ( Page 34 )

Preventive Actions taken to maintain a piece of CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA equipment within design operating conditions, prevent equipment failure, and extend its life and are performed The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which prior to equipment failure. includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and areas of the C/RP building, that is contaminated bared on Non-Corrective / Plant improvements - Maintenance the total square footage. This indscator tracks activrt>es performed to implement station improvements performance for SEP #54. ( Page 35 )

or to repair non-plant equipment, RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as:

The number of identsfied poor radiciogical work practices Emergency Conditons which significantly degrade (PRWPs) for the reparting month. This indicator tracks staten safety or availability. radiological work performance for SEP #52. ( Page 36)

I immediate Action Equipment deficiencies which significantly degrade station reliability. Potential for unft shutdown or power reduction .

DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)

The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed, the number of documents Operations Concern - Equipment defeiencies which scheduled for review, and the number of document hinder station operaton. reviews that are overdue for the reporting month. A document review is considered overdue if the review is Essential Routine corrective maintenance on not complete within six essential staton systems and equipment. months of the assigned due date. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #46. ( Page 37 )

Non-Essential Routine corrective maintenance on non-essential station systems and equipment. SECURITY INCIDENTS Plant improvement Non-corrective maintenance and The total number of secunty incidents for the reporting plant improvements. month depicted in two graphs. This indcator tracks I This indicator tracks maintenance performance for SEP

36 ( Page 32 )

secunty performance for SEP #58. ( Page 38 )

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The number of temporary mechanica! and electrical

& PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE configurations to the plant's systems.

The rato of preventive maintenance (including 1) Temporary configurations are defined as surveitance testing and calibraton procedures) to the electncal jumpers. electrical bkeks, sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks preventive maintenance completed over the reporting which are installed in the plant operating penod. The rato, expressed as a percentage, is systems and are not shown on the latest calculated based on man-hours. Also displayed are the revision of the P&lD, schematic, percent of preventive maintenance items in the month connection, winng, or flow diagrams.

that were not completed or administratively closed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25% of the 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive Surveillance Tests, Maintenance maintenance activities for SEP #41. ( Page 33 ) Procedures, Calibraton Procedures, I

Special Procedures or Operating Procedures are not considered as 59 I

i

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX

)

J UCENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS l

temporary modif: cations unless the jumper This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO or block remains in place after the test or quizzes and exams that are administered and passed procedure is complete. Jumpers and each month. This indicator tracks training performance blocks installed in test or lab instruments for SEP #68.

are not considered as temporary ( Page 46 )

modifications.

MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING

3) Scaffold is not considered a temporary OUTAGE) modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for which Mrs have been This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance submitted will be considered as temporary Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work modifications until final resolution of the MR Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for and the jumper or block is removed or is inclusion in the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage. This indicator permanently recorded on the drawings. tracks performance #31 This indicator tracks temporary ( Page 47) modifications SEP #62 and 71.

( Page 39 ) SPECIALSERVICES ENGINEERING 1998 OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT ENGINEERING AS$1 STANCE REQUEST (EAR)

CREAKDOWN This Indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

( Page 48)

This indicator shows a breakdown, by age and pnority of the EAR, of the number of EARS assigned to Design PROGRESS OF 1998 REFUELING OUTAGE Engineenng Nuclear and System Engineenng. This MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 18 indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. ( Page 40 )

This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS for installation during the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage l

( March 1998). This indicator tracks performance for The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were SEP # 31. ( Page 51 )

completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks PROGRESS OF CYCLE 18 OUTAGE MODS AND performance for SEP #62. ECNS ADDED TO 98 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER

( Page 41&42 ) FREEZE DATE ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN This indicator will show the status of Modifications and j ECNb approved for installation during the Cycle 18 This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design SEP #33. ( Page 52 )

Engineenng Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility Progress of 1997 On-Line modification Planning Changes open. ECN Substitute Replacement items open, and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator This indicator shows the status of modifications approved tracks performance for SEP #62. or in review for approval for on-line installation dunng

( Page 43 &44) 1997. This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

LICENSED OPERATOR REQUAUFICATION TRAINING The total number of hours of training given to each crew dunng each cycle. Also provided are the simulator training hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), the number of non-REQUAliFICATION training hours and the number of exam failures. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP # 68. ( Page 45 )

60 I

l SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators index is to list performance l indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15 Eggg

. Increase HPES and IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators l Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . 34 l Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate ... . . . .. .. . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations >1,000 Disintegrations / Minute Per Probe Area

_ . 25 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . . . 26 SEP Reference Numbers 25. 26. & 27

. Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented l . Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements l . Implement Supervisory Enforcement of Industrial Safety Standards l

Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate .. . 23 Recordable Injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . 24 SEP Reference Number 31

g . Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 18 Refueling Outage) 47 E . . .

Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects 48 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 lI

. 51 Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning 53 SEP Reference Number 33 l

Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECN4 Added to99 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date 52 SEP Reference Number 36

. Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Worklood Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) . 32 SEP Reference Numbers 41 & 44 I . Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule

. Compliance With and Use of Procedures Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance & Preventive Maintenance items Overdue . 33 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) 34 SEP Reference Number 41 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review .. . .. . . 37 I

61

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM lNDEX SEP Reference Number 52 Eann

. Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program . .. 36 l

SEP Reference Number 64

. Complete Implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure .. . . 18 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste . .. . . 19 l Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations 11,000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area . .. ... 25 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . . .. 35 SEP Reference Number SR

. Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Security incidents . . ...... . . . . 38 SEP Reference Numbers 60 & 61

. Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program

. Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests I licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests resulting in Licensee Event Reports 27 SEP Reference Number 62

. Establish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications .. . . .. . . 39 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . .. . . 27 Engineering Change Notice Status .. . 41&42 lI Engineering Change Notices Open .. . 43 &44 I SEP Reference Number 68

. Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requahfication Training .. . . . 45 License Candidate Exams .. .. . . . ... . . 46 SEP Reference Number 71 I . Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications . .. . .. . . 39 62

Fort Calhoun Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates l EVENT l DATE RANGE l PRODUCTION (MWH) l CUMULATIVE (MWH)

Cyde 6 06/11/80-09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Cyde 7 12/21/81 12/03/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Cyde 8 04/06/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 l

Cyde 9 07/12/84-09/28/85 4,711,488 32,477,893 Cyde 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Cyde 11 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 I Cyde 12 01/31/89-02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 Cycle 13 05/29/90-02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 Cyde 14 05/03/92-09/25/93 4,981,485 56.022,013 Cyde 15 11/26/93-02/20/95 5,043,887 61,065,900 1 Cyde 16 04/14/95-10/05/96 5,566,108 66,632,007 Cyde 17 11/25/99-04/01/98 5,183,684 71,815.678 CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47p.m.)

First Electncity Suppled to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 Days) June 8,1987-September 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468.800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH-Cyde 13) May 29,1990-February 1,1992 Shortest Refueling Outage (52 days) February 20,1995-April 14,1995 I

63

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST l D. J. Bannister K. L. Belek J. K. Kellams R. L. Jaworski G. C. Bishop J. W. Johnson C. E. Boughter D .D. Kloock C. J. Brunnert J. B. Kuhr (11 Copies)

C.A.Cadson L.T.Kusek J. W. Chase S. A. Lindquist R.G. Conner B. R. Livingston J.E. Cook T. J. Mcivor J.R. Goodell K. A. Miller M.R. Core R. J. Mueller Pat Cronin R. L. Phelps T. R. Dukarski R. L. Plott M. L. Ellis W.J.Ponec .

R. P. Clemens R. T. Ridenoure ,

S. K. Gambhir D. G. Ried J. K. Gasper M. J. Sandhoefner I W.G. Gates S. W. Gebers M. J. Guinn F. C. Scofield H. J. Sefick R. W Short R. H. Guy R. D. Spies (2 Copies)

A. L. Hale K. E. Steele B. R. Hansher D. E. Spires R. K. Hamilton M. A. Tesar K. R. Henry J. J. Tesarek J. B. Herman J. W. Tills a R.P.Hodgson D. R. Trausch C.K. Huang L. P. Walling G. R. Williams l

II I

64 i -____________________ _

ML20248A687

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

88 ==

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search