ML20155G426
| ML20155G426 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1998 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155G388 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9811090047 | |
| Download: ML20155G426 (64) | |
Text
- _ _ - - - - - - _ _ . _ _ _ - _
!l i
I OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT II 1
FORT CALHOUN STATION g
i e
t .&
~.
s
. , 6 A . , . - e
..- . (R ;f -
.. ,, , j q . .'
sk , . -
J
- _ , , ,J.', ' i 0' ' '
,.'. . /.,
.s g 4
.. .. * . * - , , ..' ,. ~
'?.'h ,' /{ '~
..]. ;. 7. g ;;,ys' {:,, . j L~
_ ,; . , ; , :j . ::. n ,: :..
- 9.
- . a
- M :<d ,:.? G ' " d ?.{; '-jd%%%
- j ggy WV,.j. g:(.c.,4(
- . , .w ' oQp 'h[%.:[ h .
g AM W' ' e NAkI$$y :
. ggb ygi q
.94 ggy,,;qg%pg
.w ,8
. w. m
. MfQ6, (3'2P i' 3 4' +
1 arf J * ~. , Ed Gi' " ' f "m l, "
" + < L ' -)
! $$l}$$ AeM W f.
N ,l l
ll I E
i l
ts -,
+
. t .
G '
L
,,..ww ' . * *_* .
I
,n.. 3 g - MO ' * '?' M 'Y* I" . - J.. 4'1 '4 , M' ..%
MDM
- 2. 'N '
\. 51,y[ ', -[j;7$;.?$AbM ff
) hiddWpM[$MM[$hh5@$Ni$$$khhdik j
t Q asi M n ssib$$ $ $$$3 din d 5ss 2 d M 4 s 1
i PERFORMANCE INDICATORS SEPTEMBER 1998 i
- SAFE OPERATIONS I PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE i COST EFFECTIVENESS i
i 9811090047 901029 DR ADOCK 0500 2 5
!I
- I
- OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
!I FORT CALHOUN STATION I
. un . .% aU d Nh
- w@
% p%h W@bbb.Ane4 Y @QGW h'J kY W # n i _ e .
.lI 8
$ w:ny%gi f.l?l;i iMb d:) ? wlbf.;
HAM 4 D L; '% %%R fN4 DW 9:.1G.:al2,;s.:, g$ ,M %.fW i3, Q'fiM /eo;Q..fi.. %\0^$6%d r
i
, ..r, :. Q
, a, y , . ,
. ~ w m..nw.gn. :~ 9 w;
- . =.w
- .7 y, . .
i h .v . L.u 7
1
.g -
4 4 ,
1-w.;j .= H v '
Y :p l es 1
% ,eA$ wo tem .. w w esgs ew:wssg yd w,ge g w; bgg Q-t -. m 4;*
mar.wa.nn;un.m n
eno% . .m. w .. ;- psg.
n ?
p& %.s
<n w tr.s ~ w itp ve*:7;p ya' .c 97.: o .. + .
aw s
g 4;jg 9.W:5NpM L l'JN - Mifyl > pror**TZhy;u E f ." N
+-
ae';;l m. .. < > ' $.{~jj+.vg; n*< '. m.yl'?g SS.,:gw* I ;a'?
,I i
wl%.MQ,
,. g 'G aWw b,y svi'm - c . .
d n?%aun@ hM3b)?%N!$;d.r.dM
?. w A /#..
..c :; <
l P/11h85dWOY Oibh135,6INPUL <; ---?W 54 l l
\
i i
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS '
SEPTEMBER 1998 SAFE OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE g COST EFFECTIVENESS I
9811090047 981029 I PDR P
ADOCK0500g5
l Table of Contents / Summary TABLE .0F C O NTENTS/SU MMAR Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 ,...........,.
I MONTH LY SU MMARY R EPO RT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 WANO PER FORMANC E IN DEX TR EN D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ... .. ..6 l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT
SUMMARY
. . . . . . . . . ..... ......... ... . .... . 7 I INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ ... ..... ... 8 WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Unit Capability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Unplanned Capability loss Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...................11 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS por 7000 Hours . . . . .. ... ... ...............12 High Pressure Safety injection System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Auxiliary Feedwater System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .......... . . 14 Em e rgency AC Powe r System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 1
Thermal Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. ..................16 Fuel Reliability indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ........... ........ .. . . . . 17 Secondary System Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Collective Radiation Emosu re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Industrial Safety Accident and Disabing injury / Illness Rate . . . . ................. .. . . . . 20 1
Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... . . ... . 21 '
l SAFE OPERATIONS Personnel Error Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 23 l
i Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ............. .. .. 24 1 i
Clean Controlled Area Contambations !
21,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area ....................................25 l 1
_ __ _ ~
Table of Contents / Summary 1
\
Preventable / Personnel Error LERs .. . . . ... . 26 )
i Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown . . .. .. . 27 l i
- Violation Trend . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . 28 COST l Cents Per Kilowatt Hour . . . . . ., , . 30 DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1
Maintenance Workload Backlog (Corrective Non4utage) .. . . . 32 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . .. .. .. .. . 33 )
Procedural Noncompliance Incidents . . . . 34 '
Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . 35 ;
1 Radiological Work Practices Program . .. . . . 36 I Document Review . . . . . . . .37 !
l Security Incidents . . . ... .. . . . .38 Temporary Modifications . . . . . 39 )
i I Outstanding Modifications . .. . . . . . .40
]
Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . . . . 41 j 1
4
,l
- Engineenng Change Notices i
.E Status .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .42 Open . . . ... .. . .. . 43 1 Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . . . 44 Licensed Operator Requalification Training . .45 License Candidate Exams . . . . . . 46 Cycle 19 Refueling Outage MWD Planning Status . . . . . .. . . . 47 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage . 48 i
! Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . . . . . . 49 l
I l Table of Contents / Summary Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . . .. . .. ... . 51 ACTION PLANS. DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX Action Plans .. . . . .... . . ... .. . .. .53 Performance lndicator Definitions . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . 54 Safety Enhancement Program Index , . . . . .. . .. . . . 59 Current Production and Operations " Records"/ Station Operating Cycles and RFO Dates . 61 Monthly Performance Indicator Sources . . . . . . . . 62 3 ;
I l 3
l FORT CALHOUN STATION Monthly Summary l OPERATIONS i
Dunng the month of September 1998, the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) operated at a nominal 100% power.
Normal plant maintenance, surveillance, and equipment rotation activities were performed during the month.
WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The overall WANO Performance Index was 82.3% during the 3rd Quarter of 1998. Significant percentage point losses are attributed to the WANO Performance Indicators listed below:
- 1. The Unit Capability FactorIndicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contnbuted to a 3.7 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on page 10.
- 2. The Unplanned Capability Loss FactorIndicator calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 6.6 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on pages 10 and 11. l
- 3. The Thermal Performance Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.3 point loss due to thermal energy losses experience during reactor power changes and forced l
outages defined on pages 10 and 16.
I 4. The Collective Radiation Exposure Indicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, i
l I
contributed to a 3.4 point loss, which was attnbuted to fuel failures and recent high exposure jobs during the refueling outage on page 19.
- 5. The Emergency AC Powerindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 1.2 point loss, which was a result of on-line maintenance, and replacement of relays under ECN95-347,
" Replace Relays for Seismic Adequacy" on page 15.
- 6. The Chemistry Performance IndexIndicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.4 point loss, which is due to copper tubes in heat exchangers and mechanical shock to systems in the past year from forced outages defined on page 18.
l
-o-index Median -+- index Best Quartile -+-Index Worst Quartile -e-. Fort Calhoun 100- 100 95 - - 95 90 - p: : - 90 85 j p+ /=== -
85 l
80 - = _
80 ,
75 -
[ -4 - 75 70 - - 70 l m-m : : . : : : i ,
e m
0 8 S
$$$A e
0$fE$$$
Ee E
$e 3$$$$$e$$$*$$l2S$$m$8fs$04@Y$$ BB~~
- o 1
WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND 1
Fort Calhoun index Calculation '- Third Quarter 1998 -
OVERALL PERFORMANCE NDIC. WEIGHT VALUE: PRODUCT Unit Capability Factor (2yr) 0.16 78.3 12.3 l Unpl. Cap. Loss Factor (2yr) 0.12 8.3 5.4 Unplanned Auto Scrams (2yr) 0.08 0.0 s.0 Safety System Performance:
PWR High Press. Inj. (2yr) 0.10 0.000 10.0 PWR Aux. Feedwater (2yr) 0.10 0.003 10.0 i Emergency AC Power (2yr) 0.10 0.015 a.s Thermal Performance (1yr) 0.06 99.9 5.7 Fuel Rel. (Most recent qtr) 0.08 1.0E.06 8.0 Chemistry Perf. Ind. (1yr) 0.07 1.15 6.6 Collective Rad. Exposure (2yr) 0.08 229 4.6 Ind. Safety Acc. Rate (1yr) 0.05 0.32 4.9 NORM.I- 84.2 5
18.00 -8 3
I 16.00 14.00 - 88 0 m ~
3M A XlM UM V A L U E gSecond Otr 98 3 Third Otr '98 12.00 888 888 8 0
= 8 888 888 3.00 = === === 88 g
, e.00 - $. '
b ))$
4.00 - $ -
2.00 .': '
l^ , .
+Y O.00 -F + +- + + + + + + -a UCF UCLF HPSI AFW EACP CRE UA7 FRI CPI TPI ISAR WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS This graph shows the dfference between Second Qtr '98 and Third Qtr '98 actual values achieved by Fort Calhoun.
CALCULATED OVER A 24 MONTH PERIOD MAXIMUM / ACTUAL VALUES TREND UCF Unit Capability Factor 16 /12.30 increase UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12/ 5.40 Decrease HPSI High Pressure Safety injection 10/10.00 No Change I AFW UA7 Auxiliary Feedwater EACP Emergency AC Power Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hours 10/10.00 10/ 8.80 8 / 8.00 No Change Decrease No Change CRE Collective Radiation Exposure 8 / 4.50 Decrease CALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD TPI Thermal Performance Indicator 6 / 5.70 No Change CPI Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7/ 6.60 Decrease ISAR Industnal Safety Accident Rate 5/ 4.90 Decrease CALCULATED OVER A QUARTERLY PERIOD FRI Fuel Reliability Indicator 8/ 8.00 No Change I
I I
I 6
i PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
SUMMARY
REPORT I
ADVERSE TREND REPORT POSITTVE TREND REPORT A performance indicator with data representing three A performance indicator with data representing three consecutive months of improving performance of three consecutive months of consecutive months of declining performance or three consecutive months of performance that is trending toward dechning as performance that is superior to the stated goal rs exhibiting a positive determined by the Manager- Nuclear Licensing, constitutes an trind per Nuclear Operations Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD-adverse trend per Nuclear Operations Division Qualdy Procedure 37 QP-37) The following performance indicators exhibited positive I trinds for the reporting month: (NOD-QP-37). A supervisor whose performance indicator exhibits an adverse trend by this definition may specify in wetten form (to be Unolanned Autopiatic Reactor Scrams (Page 12) published in this report) why the trend is not adverse.The following performance indicators exhibited adverse trends for the reporting month.
I Hiah Pressure Safety iniection System Safety System Performance (Page 13)
Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (Page 25)
Aux. Feed Water System Safety System Performance (Page 14) l Thermal Performance (Page 16) INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT Industrial Sa'ety Accident & Disabhna Iniuv/ illness (Page 20)
A performance indicator with data for the reporting penod that is I Volume of Low-level Radioactive Waste (Page 21) inadequate when compared to the OPPD goal is defined as *Needing increased Management Attention
- per (NOD-QP-37).
Procedural Noncomoliance incidents (Page 34)
Secondary Ststem Chemistry (Page 18)
Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area (Page 35)
Collective Radiation Exoosure (Page 19)
Document Review (Page 37)
Cents Per Kilowatt Hour (Page 30)
License Candidate Exams-1998 (Page 47)
Radioloaical Work Practices Prooram (Page 36)
Temoorary Modincations (Page 39) l l
i I
t 7
i R Significant O Noteworthy 16 - 14 14 -
12 -
10 - 7 7 8- 6 5
6- 3 4- 3 2
3 2- : 0 0 0- '
r "" r r- , Mr -
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 l L._
l INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS 1
Noteworthy /Significant events at FCS are classified by INPO to identify precursors to events. There was l 0 Significant and 1 Noteworthy Event during the month of September 1998. l l
Slanificant Events for September 1998: l
. none l
Noteworthy Events since start of INPO Cvele:
Includes three historical events.
. Waste Disposal System Valves susceptable to over pressurization during post accident sampling due to potential valve failure not considered during System Design. (Historical)
. Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Overspeed and Overpressurization of System Piping.
. Containment Hydrogen Panel Components Exceed Qualified Life Due to incorrect Calculation l' Assumptions. (Historical)
. Transformer Fault and Loss of Off-Site Power While Shutdown Due to inadvertent Actuation of l Transformer Deluge System.
- Degraded Steam Generator Tube Left in Service Due to Personnel Error. (Historical)
- Reactor Coolant Pump Cavitation During Planned Pressure Reduction.
D-ta Source: Frans/Guinn (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Frans/Guinn Trend: None I
li l'
lI l
WANO l l PERFORMANCE lI INDICATORS lI ,
!I i
lI I ;
i I
I 9
I
M onthly Unit Capability Factor -m~ 24 Month Unit Capability Factor 120.0 % * $$$ $$ f $$$$$ f f j j e 8 8 8 8 8
- 8 8 8 8 8 o mmm E
f E E E 88_8_
"'._.,i 100 0% - E g
f 8_ i g
~ -
0"*
C0.0%
N ,_ = = = - =- ,[
. = = =f5 L = = =
40.0 % 1998 RFO 20 0 % [
a f a $
o o 0.0% h.-_-._,_. ,
, . , 7 7. _ 7 _ _ _ _ , . _ _ , . _ ,
4 8 8 7 2 ? e * *
- 1e i e_ 4 4 4 4 e 8 8akA : ski A $a 8a8hw i E R $a 1 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR I UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy g:niration over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. The FCS Goal for the indicator is (87.5%) and the WANO Median is (81.9%).
l
~ UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR AVERAGES : l l Year to Date 72.9%
12 Month 79.5%
24 Month 74.9%
36 Month 80.4 %
Enerav Loss e Forced Outage-Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Ev:nt Period: September 10, thru13,1997.
Power Reduction- Faculty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Ev:nt Period: August 26,28,1997.
Forced Outage- Circumferential cracking of a weld down stream of a moisture separator due to high system stresses Ev:n! ' Hod: May 28, thru May 29,1997.
Forced Outage- Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system Ev:nt Period: April through mid May 1997.
A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCF indicator was 12.30 points out of 16 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 12.30 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 10.60.
Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Solymossy Tr:nd: None 10
E---) Monthly unpl2nned Capability Loss Factor -m-- 24-Month Rolling Aver gs Fort Ccthoun Goal (3.5%) + W ANO Industry Msditn (2.2%)
60.00% $
50.00% - h p
40.00% h h R R 30.00% - -
g 1998 RFO ggg gg
~
20.00% -
gg ff gg ggg I 10.00 % o of p VT
~
I - '" I . . ... .....
0.00% r^
I!8 3s$45$E{I$E$.I3z 2 s<sa4 <
5 E!"$$![sa4I5I#gi
$4 2 s< < .t l
l J
UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling l 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median. UCLF is defined as the l ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy g::neration expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not I produced as a result of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to i causes under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they aro not scheduled at least four weeks in advance. 1 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR AVERAGES
. Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 5.13% 4.06 % 8.2% 7.4%
i A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCLF indicator was 6.40 points out of 16 points. At the end of the l Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.40 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 6.50.
l l
Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Solymossy !
Trend: None 11 1
i
-e-- 12-Month Rolling Avercg)
-+-- PCS Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critical for last 36 months i Fort Calhoun Goal (0.0)
--m- WANO Industry Median (0)
--*-- FCS Reactor Scrams - 1997-98
)
2 -- l 1'
l a
I~~ 1998 RFO 0: = = = = = = = = = = =
i h o 8 ,E $ 5 E D E $, E S z o u- m < z z < y, j
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL l l
The graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD goal for 1998 and the WANO industry Median. Also the graph shows the number of Unplanned Automatic
. Reactor Scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. There were no Unplanned Automatic
- Reactor's during the month of September 1998.
1 l (UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HO'URS CRITICALL Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month
- 0% 0% 0% 0%
i A 24 month calculation of the WANO UA7 indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 8.0.
l Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
- Accountability: Solymossy Trend: Positive 4
12
i l
l R!E MonthlyFFSISystem UnavailabilityValue I
--A- 12 Month ibiling Average i Fort Calhoun Goal (0.003) l
--o- WANOIndustryMedian (0.002)
)
0.02 -
0.016 -
0.01 --
1998 RFO 4
0.005 --
I
\
0--* ; ; ; *
- : : : , : .; A : , : : : : : a !
E o S % E @ $ h E S O z 5 ,E ' E <
2 g 4 < m l I
HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for September 1998. The HPSI System unavailability value for the month of September 1998 was 0.0. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned unavailability, and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability.
LHIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE?
Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0% 0% 0% 0%
A 24 month calculation of the WANO HPSI indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of tha Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 10.0 Data Source: Skiles/Schaffer (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Skiles/Schaffer Tr:nd: Positive 13
--o--12 Mtnth AFW Unavailability Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01)
WANO Industry Median (0.001) 0.015 --
0.013 --
0.011 -
0.009 -
0.007 -
0.006 0.002 N - 1998 RFo 0.003 _ 0.002 X, g .,,
0.001 --
--4-- -- ---
g 4 001 -
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMS SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of September 1998.
The AFW System Unavailability Value for September 1998 was 0.006 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. There were 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> of planned and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month.
AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMS SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE '
Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month l 0.00245% 0.0151 % 0.003% 0.003%
l A 24 month calculation of the WANO AFW indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Second Quarter I 1998 value of 10.0.
Data Source: Skiles/Fritts (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Skiles/Fritts Trcnd: Positive E
~
14
m Monthly Em ergency AC Powor UnavailabilityValue
---us- Year-to Date Em ergency AC Power Unavailability Value Fort Calhoun Goal (0.024)
---*- WAN O Indu s try Media n(0.005) 0.07 - 8 0.06 - 5 e 0.05 -
0.04 -
g 0.03 - g g g o '
0,02 -
0.01 - m- : g g&&o_ d 0 , ,M,E -M, ~, ~ ,M E -WM , ~ .
, ~,
8 g
B g ,E S a
a 2 y s& ,E 4 4 &
m U
o z 8 8 o
EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by WANO I in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of September 1998.The Emtrgency AC Power System unavailability value for September 1998 was 0.004.
Monthly Statistics Planned Unavailability: DG 1: 2.9 DG 2: 3.2 Total: 75.25 YTO: 187.25 Hours Unclanaqd Unavailabi!Itv: DG-1: 0.0 DG 2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTD: 00.0 Hours EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0.018 % 0.017 % 0.015 % 0.015 %
_ A 24 month calculation of the WANO EACP indicator was 8.80 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.80 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 9.40.
D:ta Source: Skiles/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Skiles/Ronning
{ Trend: Needing increased Management Attention 15 9
m MonthlyThermalPerformance i i 12-Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (99.7%;
-*- W ANO lndustry Media n (99.1 %)
5 g
- 1998 g g 8 $
8 $ 8 8 g g . RFO $ $ $ $
Y ~ ~
j ,,,
I I I E R I _ , B I E R I 98% + + + + + + +--* +
> + + H o e o u x a -
5 g ~>
E 8 4 a' & E' 9 8 e I g $
_J l THERMAL PERFORMANCE I OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median.This indicator shows the monthly The Th3 thermal performance value for the month of September was 100.0%. The year to date value I
was reported as 99.9%. The 12 month rolling average (October 1997 through September 1998) was reported as 99.9%.
I Note: Our Best Achievable Gross Heat Rate improved by 4% ! is month (it is now 63 BTU /kwh better than design.), Primarily this is attributable to the nuv High Pressure Turbine l diaphragms that were installed during the 1998 refueling outage.
Th31998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is an index value which is > 99.7%. The 12 l month calculation of the WANO TPIindicator 99.1%.
Tho 12 month calculation of the WANO TPIindicator was 5.7 points out of 6 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.7 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 5.7.
I Data Source: Skiles/Naser(Manager / Source)
I Accountability: Skiles/Naser Trend: Positive
[
16
.. _.__a
Fuel Reliability (E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)
A End of 1998 Goal (17.3 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)
-e-. WANO IndustryMedian (0.21E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)
E 100 -
2 10 A
.c 1.8 3
1_
b
.g = = = =
0.1 - = =
3
$ 0.01 --
m ,
0.01 0.01 0.01 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR Tha monthly Fuel Reliability indicator (FRI) for September 1998 of 0.01 E-04 microcuries/ gram was based on steady state data at 100% power. The purpose of the FRI is to monitor industry progress in achieving and maintaining a high level of fuelintegrity. An effective fuelintegrity and performance I physical condition, exposure, mechanism, and location. monitoring program provide
- IE Coolant activity data through September 30,1998 does not show the presence of any defective fuel rods. lodine activity levels are higher than expected for a clean core. This is due to operating with fuel failures for the past 2.5 cycles which contributed to the large amount of tramp (lodine-134) and lodine-131 currently present in Cycle 18. The current lodine-134 activity indicates that 70 percent of the tramp material in the active core region was removed during the spring 1998 refueling outage.
X non-133 is about 1.5 decades lower than in Cycle 17, another indication of a defect-free core.
The Quarterly calculation of the WANO FRI indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value l of 0.0.
I D ta Source: Guinn/Roenigk (Manager / Source) l Accountability:
Trend:
Solymossy/Stafford None
[
17
1
, ammi Monthly ChemistryIndicator
=
1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (1.1)
-=-WANO industry Media n (1.04) 1.6 --
I 1.4 1.2
\
1.36 g 1.29 1.05
I '" l'" #
=
a : e = =
= a : 1 0.8 -
" ~
I ll B' R
. .. E E I B 1998 0.2 -
0 4- -+- -+- -+
h -+ h M m + -
w 0 0
-+ + i + +
h m -i Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug sep g SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY Strady state plant conditons required for calculating the Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) for plant performance following Refueling Outage that ended on June 3.
The CPI for September 1998 is 1.12, which is lower then August. Chemical impurity limits for treatment I chemicals is being reduced to further lower impurity ingress. Reference memo FC-C-091-98, see action pt:n. The CPI value for the past 12 months (October 1997 through September 1998) was 0.96. The CPI value in the industry's upper quartile is 1.17. Six parameters are used in the CPI calculation. Four of the parameters were below the WANO mean value which are as follows: 1) steam generator chloride,2) sulfate,
- 3) feedwater iron, and ;ondensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. Increase in CPI observed this month due to power ascention from refueling outage. This is an expected condition.
The 12 month calculation of the WANO CPI Indicator was 6.60 points out of 7 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 6.60 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 7.00 D:ta Source: Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Hamilton Tr nd: Needing increased Management Attention 18
m M o n t hly R a dia tio n Dose (S R D)
+ Accumulated Dose based on SRD reading 250000 --
g .- : : : 0 200000 - E 3
3 150000 --
N o 2 100000 -- g a
50000 - 8
- f g m
g s
s n
g o
0 ^, : "+ b +-+ ;-+=l : : :
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE Th31998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhoun Station was established for a Total Dose of 224.0 person-Rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are obtained. The exposure for September 1998 was 4031 person-Rem (ED). The WANO Industry Median is 127 person-REM per year based on a three year average compared to 139 person-REM per year at FCS.
LTLD COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE FOR 19982 DOSE FCS GOAL PERSON. FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH REM QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER TOTAL 224.0 15.560 193.163 8.516 person-Rom I Th^) 24 month calculation of the WANO CRE Indicator was 2.7 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 2.7 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 4.60.
D:ta Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP54 19
l czca M onthly industrial Safety Accident & Disabling injuryllliness Rate
---dr-- 12 Month Rolling Average FCS Year-End Goal (<0.40)
--as-- Year 2000 WANO industry Goal (<0.40) l 0.9 I 0.8 -
0.7 y Q N n N N E
= = =N = k h I - -
0.3 - <
~
0.2 - E ? ?d ~~~
(
- ~ d
)
%, a a b lt . 4 w &
Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep j
INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE) j The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in the indicator.
l ISAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fatalities) x 200.000 l (number of station person-hours worked) l The Fort Calhoun Station Industrial Safety Accident Rate and Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate was 0.21 for the month of September 1998. The 12 month rolling average i (October 1997 through September 1998) was 0. The year to date value was 4 at the end of September 1998. There was no restricted-time and no lost-time accident in September 1998.
3
, The 12 month calculation of the WANO ISAR Indicator is 4.90 points out of 5 points. At the end l of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 4.90 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 5.0.
Data Source: Sorensen/Gunn (Manager / Source)
Solymossy/ Booth (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Solymossy/Short Trend: Positive SEP 25,26 & 27 d
20
m Monthly Volume of LLRW (cu. meter) m Year-to-Date Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried
-=--WANO Industry Median (54 cu. meter)
Fort Cahoun Goal (23 cu. meter )
=
1 j 40.00 -
.2 j 30.00 I 0 20.00 - M 8 N I 10.00 8 o
- GS C: & E gO O e 8 Ms 84 84 84 8* gj 8og
- 0.00 M, E oE oE om min y l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul m , , , ,
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I
l VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE T
y:his indicator ar-to-date shows radioactive theburied.
waste volume TheofFort theCalhoun monthly Radioactive goalis Waste buried and the cumulative 23 cubic meters.
l Ft m' Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during current month :
I Volume of solid radwaste buried during September 1998 :
000.0 0.00 140.6 4.00 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1998 : 476.3 13.5 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage : 000.0 00.00 The WANO industry Median is 54 cubic meters per year. The industry Best Quartile value is approximately 26 cubic meters per year, I
Data Source: Solymossy/Breuer (Manager / Source)
[ Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trcnd: Positive SEP54
[
21
I I
I SAFE OPERATIONS I
l Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear organization. Individuals l demonstrate professionalism through self-ownership sad personal initiative and open communication.
l I
l l
[
[
22
i ,, _ ._ , m=t. . ,Cs e.a, eo,,,n0 ,,,,, ma,.
9.000 _ 8.81 8.51 8.000 l g 7.000 - 6.67 6 42
! 6.000 -
E 4.39
- 8. 5 3.48 3.47 3.65- -
$ 3.000 - 1,91 3 2.19 2.49.
~
2 C l % 2.000 -1.06 g l g 56 R 1
1 .27 j $ $ E.,.w ; ; w ~ ; h ; ; w ; w ; h ; w ; w ; E C w T " . 2 o.w w i ///////////////////
f ///////////////////
l I
Personnel Error Rate l The prpose of tNs irdmtor is to nmtor human error eents at FCS wNdi are dassified as a "Notsathy Event,"
tnder the citaia speafied in the Caldtion Report Fkgrarn Noteurthy eents may be dassified m leal one, two, cr three on a Condtion Repat or m defined but rd linited to the emmpes listed belcw Error Rate = number of human errors x hours everv two weeks 100,000 hrs I 1.
2.
3.
ArwdciieinjuyinindustrialsWdy Vahe Msposboning eent caused by plant pa 5u nd Eqtipnut tagjng arcr that sig Jus ijy inpacts sWe c(= c&ri d the plant, readness cr personal sdety.
I
- 4. Inproper use d or fslue to use safety eqtignent or perfarning a task in an unsafe manner.
5.
Any ewnt irmMng loss d radcadne nitsial contrd the nny cause or potentidly result in an indvkisi reaerdng al mauthanzedegasure.
6 I A1y spill or speed d radicadne nuterial, W1id1 results in an inpa:t on the plant er the generai sdety d plant pasonnelorthegensalpublic 7.
Fslue to utilize, or athere to setnd radaban pindples, or accepted achinistratNe contrds to keep ocwpational radiecn exposure, or expostre to nuroeni d public AUWA
- 8. Chenistry peraneter(s) cut d specfation, irNdVing insuffiQent Chenistry conedNe actiO1 Cr (Mrsight.
- 9. Voldiandpc dureorhtmanperfanui errcr.
10.
Less than 3 deep (qualified fruiin s) in nininum stamng position for the Contrd Roont TSC, OSC, and ECF.
- 11. Any u1 planned inpad to offsite evacudicn routes or relection capability.
- 12. Any fsitre or theft d u ra gary response eqtipment er supplies ne ssary to oxrpiele dassrficticn, nctificdicn, potedive action rw m a dauen or ERO cc m a id & contrd funcbcns.
- 13. Inadequatetrsning erquairfaticn
- 14. Fslue to aiequWely stWf the ERO in actual responses cr drill natirx:aban Th3 Rolling Error Rate is calculated over the past 12 month period. Until 12 months of data are cvailable, this line is considered information only.
Data Source: Tesar/Burggraf(Manager / Source)
Accountability: Solymossy/Tesar Tr:nd: None 23
m Monthly Recordable Injuryllliness Rate 1998 F.C.S. Goal (1.5) 2-1.6 -
1.2 -
0.82 0.8 - 0.e3 0.53 0.4 0.3
}3 0.23 0
0 0
-rmr "m }
r- -r gr , , , ,
Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly Recordable injury / illness Frequency Rate. A recordable l injury / illness case is reported if personnel from any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid.
l There was one recordable injury for the month of September 1998. A Security Officer strained his back while bending over to take a film out of a VCR unit. The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date recordable injury rate is .82. The goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.
I I Data Source: Sorensen/Gunn (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Short I Trend: None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 24
m Contamination Events (Monthly)
E Contamination Events (YTD) 90 90 84 80 77 60 -
40 - 36 30 2r g;
I 0 - , ,_ , , , , 1, ,
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >1,000 DISINTEGRATIONSIMINUTE PER PROBE AREA I
This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for contaminations >1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for September 1998.
I There were 6 personnel contamination events in September 1998. The total year-to-date of "Persnnnel events is 90 at the end of September 1998. This indicator has been classified as I Needing increased Management Attention," due to an upward trend of Year to date contamination events over the past three months.
I Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Accountability : Solymossy/Puckett
[ Trtnd: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 15 & 54 25
I I I 35 30
-+--Total Events
-e--- Pre venta ble 3o 18 Month Totals 33 30 l
--*- Personel Error 29 26 28 , 27 25 25 24 24 N < 21 19 15 15 12 I2 I3 13 I3 13 13 4 , _ _ _ _ 13 12 10 g A 34 33 8 13 33 33 7 7 0
9 _7 _
5 7 7 ~
7 -6 6 '6 0
~
m m a a a a a a a a s a s a a a d i I4 4 I$a $ } $$ $ $ 4 I4 4 I PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs.
The graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnel Error I LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the LER cvent date as opposed to the LER report date.
In August 1998, there were three (3) events which were subsequently reported as LER's. No LER's were categorized as " Preventable" and No LER was categorized as " Personnel Error" during the month of August. The total LERs for the year 1998 are twelve. The total Personnel Error LERs for the year 1998 are two.
The year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values for the 18-month totals not to exceed 5 Preventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs.
l NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.
I Data Source: Frans/Matzke (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Solymossy I Trend: None SEP 15 41 lI 26
!I J
"* AdMn
! 12%
- 8%
i j Lo Err.
i 12 %
l 1
j oesign j 41 % A I
other Err.
j 19%
w i
j l ./
mint.
8%
i j LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN i
2 This indicator shows the LERs by event date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past j eighteen months from March 1997, through August 31, 1998. To be consistent with the j Preventable / Personnel Error LERs indicator, this indicator is reported by the LER event date, as l opposed to the LER report date.
The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed j descriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.
i NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-month behind.There were l three event's in August 1998 that resulted in an LER. There were no missed surveillance
!- tests resulting in LERs during August 1998. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for this j indicator is 0.
L i
i Data Source: Frans/Matzke (Manager / Source) i Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 l
l, i
27 i
}
. - - - , - - , - - . . - . - , . . - ~ - . . . _ , . . _ , , , - - - . - - - .-,. -,,,-, ., . - . , - , - - - .
l 5
g g; QJHM sty # 12 Month l uman FCS Cited Violations (Monthly)
I B m
a unum FCS tbn-Cited Violations (Monthly)
)
m .
g_ g .
10 -
16 -
s - u -
y _
D E '
6 8 - - - -
E ~
6 8 '
4 6- -
6 3- - --
4 - -
4 - -
2-E 5 ;mM;b- --
o; E; ; L.4 o: ; ; ;m:
aeB " "g 8 885 e 55%iR 1 I 1!*
.3 '
l VIOLATION TREND i This indicator depicts twelve months of violation data for Fort Calhoun Station. Illustrated monthly are Cited Violations and Non-Cited Violations. The current SALP cycle began on August 3,1997 and ends on January 30,1999. l The following inspection reports noting violations were issued during September 1998: Violation Level IER No. Title None l To date, OPPD has received forty five violations for inspection reports issued in the current SALP ' cycle. Two (2) Level IV violations received in August 1997 and three (3) Level IV violations received in October 1997, were carried over from the previous SALP cycle due to a lag in the reporting l process. Levelill Violations 1 l Level IV Violations Non-Cited Violations 21 2L_ Total 45 I The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the top quartile plants in Region IV. Data Source: Frans/Cavanaugh (Manager / Source) Accountability: Frans Trend: None 28
- s ll
- s
- s
!i COST ! i! Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that cost effectively maintains nuclear generation as an economically I viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line. Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the organization. g I I I I l I I I I 29
12 Month Rolling Average
-*-- Actual -e--- Budget -e- Plan 4.00 3.50 -
.00 -
g g g4 = 2.50 - g 2.00 1.50 1.00 + + E E E E E E E E E E E E E ljy j i O O Oeej7$4 2 ck2> E m S E tm E
's <t $i 0 e E
i z E 6 o CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR August 1998 The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current year. The bisis for the budget curve is the approved 1998 revised budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report. The December 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1993 through 1997. In addition, the report shows the plan cmounts for the years 1999 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the Nuclear Long Range Financial PlIn and the 1998 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels. Th312 month rolling average unit price period of ( September 1997 through August 1998) averaged above budget du3 to the extended refueling outage and less generation during the period. The 12 month rolling average is 3.27 cents per kilowatt hour. The year-to-date (YTD) average is trending in a positive direction. Cents per KWH Jan Feb Mar Aor May Jun Jul Auo Seo Oct Nov Dec l Budget YTD 3.02 2.85 3.27 4.13 3.80 3.53 3.37 3.21 3.13 3.08 3.01 2.96 Actual 2.96 2.85 3.00 3.26 4.16 4.39 4.03 3.77 Projected YTD 3.61* 3.50* 3.39' 3.29' NOTE: This information lags by a month due to the short tum around required for processing.
- Projected numbers reflect the values for YTD if the plant is to operate within budgets for the remaining period of the year.
~ Dit2 Source: Gayoso/ Huang (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gayoso/ Huang Tr:nd: Needing incresed Management Attontion 30
DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT 1 PERFORMANCE
' INDICATORS I
l Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power
! production.
I I [ E 31 M
M Corrective Malntenance M Preventive Maintenance Non Corrective / Plant improvements Fort Calhoun Goal (200) 900 -- 800 ~ 723 808 773 692 696 732 I
~ 892 671 538 557 522 600 --
400 -- 300
- E+E-+-E'+- - i-+ a+a+a+ +m m+a I 0- -
4 b Non-Outage Malntenance Work Document Backlog se To t aiMWDs I MWD PRIORITY PERCENT OF MWD's PAST GOAL BY PRIORITY Priority 2 Priority 1 100% 600 - % 455 Priority 3 I 500-400- 78% 300 - 200 - l 100 - 0 5 101 g 77 Priority 4 39.1 % 0 -m m-- -+ U -s Riority Riority Priordy Priouly Priority l 1 2 3 4 5 l MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month,a breakdown by maintenance classification and priority. The 1998 goal for this l indicator is 200 non-outage corrective maintenance MWDs. The current backlog of corrective MWDs is 161 I totals include a manual count of RAMS work orders. Currently RAMS can not be queried for a report. The manual count in RAMS is subject to error. Non-outage maintenance completion goals have been established asfollows: I G9.81 Priority 1 24 hours Priority 2 7 days I Priority 3 30 days Priority 4 90 days
! Priority 5 As resources permit
[ Note: Data provided is the most accurate available; until Rams is capable of generating reports. Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source) f Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens I Trend: None SEP 36 32
_ e en1~. m . _ n,e _ e j 100 % 74 % 76 % 79% 79 % 75% 80 % 75% 74 % 72 % 77 % 76 % i l E 0% - l-+-l--+l--+l-+-lwl-+ Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep EEng Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2% 7 'A ~ 6.02% 6% 6.60% l
~
4.09 % 4.01 % 4% - 3% - l 2.60% 2.60% 2% - / . :: ; .; . 1% - .] . 0;80',' 0.60%
-+- '" + * -+-
0% - : ' -- + -+- -+ E , -+- -+- --i Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE i Tha top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 76% for the month of September 1998. -l
" The lower graph shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that were not completed by the late finish date. From the period of (August 15th thru September 15th) there were 3PM's that were I completed late or not completed out of 418 scheduled. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue is a maximum of 2%.
Note: Data provided is the most accurate available; until Rams is capable of generating reports. J :3 Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager /Scurce) Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 41 & 44 33
I Human Performance CRs(Maintenance) 20 -- 18 - l 16 - 14 --
@12 - 11 10 5
o 8-6-- I 4- 3 2 2 I 2- 1 1 1 1 0- M.E E k _4_ !+ +E: ; Oct Pbv Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLlANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) I incidents assigned to the Maintenance Department.This indicator shows the num I I Data Source: Clemens/Burggraf (Manager / Source) I Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: Positive SEP 15,41 & 44 I ,I 34 ,I
M Contaminated Radiation Controlied Area 1098 Fort Calhoun Goal (5%) 6 % -- 5%- 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4%- 3%-- 2%- l 1% 1 I 0%- Jan
--+-
Feb
-t-Mar Apr
-t- (
May June
+
July
-t-Aug
+
Sep l Oct l Nov l Dec
-i I
CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that is contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of September 1998, the total l contaminated area was 3383 square feet which is 4.8 percent of the RCA . The monthly FCS goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area. I Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: Positive SEP54 M 35
m Monthly Fbor Radiation Worker Practices e Total FHWP for 1998 1998 Fort Cahoun Goal (<20) 25-
~
18 18 18 15 14 11 10 5- 33 3 3 2 l 0-Jan Feb Mar
+
Apr
+
May
-+
June
+
July Aug sep oct Nov Dec I RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM i Tha Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to l qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. This indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 month increasing trend of poor radiation worker practices based on YTD. I During the month of September there were O PRWP identified. l There have been a total of 18 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998. The 1998 FCS goal is <20 PRWPs, the 1997 goal was <15 PRWPs. { Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trcnd: Needing increased Management Attention SEP52 b [ 36
E Documents Scheduled for Review 5 Document Reviews complete during month O Documents Overdue 300 - 250 - 200 - l :!! D [+4g++g4 g+ O- + + + + + H I Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June J uly Aug Sep 1997-1998 DOCUMENT REVIEW The Document Review indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.The documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, I Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual. l l During September 1998, there were 27 document reviews scheduled, while 222 reviews were completed. At the end of the month, there were O document reviews more than 6 months overdue. There were 7 new documents initiated during September 1998. I Data Source: Ferec/Plath (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Ponec Trend: Positive SEP 46 [ 37 r .
'l 35 so - -
25 -- - -- l 20 - - - --
.A.
15 -
- jo _ 2 _ _ _ __ _ .
-"+ (
5- - - - - - - - JN FEB MAR APR g MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP oCT NOV DEC 98 Loggables 98 Non-Loggables I : 97 Loggables - - - + - - 97 Non-Loggables SECURITY INCIDENTS The Loggable and Non-Loggable incident (Security) Indicators are depicted in the chart above. The chart depicts the total number of loggable and non-loggable hurnan error events *and system failures which occurred during the reporting month. During the month of September 1998, there were 11 loggable incidents and 6 non-loggable incidents I idsntified (excluding access denials). Of all incidents identified this month six (6) were human error events. Of loggable events, only one (1) was a human performance error and ten (10) were system failures. There were three (3) internal human performance errors in September. There was one I to be a departmental priority.(1) non-loggable access denial during the reporting per I l I Data Source: Accountability: Trend: Sefick/ Clark (Manager / Source) Sefick None SEP 58 L 38
m Termorary Modifications >1. fuel cycle old (RFO required for rennval) m Termorary Wd:fications >6 months old (Removable on-line)
- Fort Calhoun Goals for both Ter@orary Modifications' categories (0) 7-6- 6 5-4 4-3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 m _ .
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Wy June July Aug Sept l TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the number of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater than one fuel cycle old I old. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goals for both of the TM categories are zero. requiring a At the end of September 1998, there were no TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for rzmoval. At the end of September 1998, there were six (6) TM's installed that were greater than six months old which could be removed on4ne. DCN #0006121 (TM 96-039), Railroad Siding / Corridor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996. DCN
#0006164 ( TM 97-021), CCW corrosion monitor, was installed February 18,1998. DCN #0006165 (TM 97-022), LPSI Header Pressure Gauge at PT-325, was installed December 12,1997. DCN #0006186 (TM 98-003), FI 1112, FW-54 Suction Flow Indicator, was installed March 16,1998. DCN #0006187 (TM 98-004), TPCW System Corrosion Monitor was I instilled March 24,1998. DCN #0006188 (TM 98-005), YlT 6286 A&B YlT 6288 A&B was installed February 27,1998.
At tha end of September 1998, there was a total of eleven (11) TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. Three (3) of the eleven (11) installed TMs require a RFO for removal and eight (8) are removable on-line. In 1998, a total of twenty I (20) TMs have been installed. At the end of September 1998, there were three (3) procedural or maintenance configuration alterations (PMCAs)(a special classification of TM) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station using PRC approved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order O-25. D ta Source: Skiles/Plott (Manager / Source) Accountability: Skiles/ Core Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 62&71 39
I cru Total Modification Packages Open 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (68) 69 - 67 ~ _. 65 - 65 65 65 62 " 7 7 63 - 61 p y 61 - Q 7 [b $@ 59 - N m R
,a #
m Mw W) a 57 - : g g m g E
' ~
55 ,
=
2E , , , , May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ' I OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of Outstanding Modifications (excludina outstandina modifications which are crocosed to be cancelled). I Reporting Catecorv '90 '94 '95 35 j
'QZ '93 SQ Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 I Mod. Requests Being Reviewed D: sign Engr. Backlog /In Progress Construction Backlog /In Progress 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 3 17 2 2 1 23 26 2 I Design Engr. Update Backlog /In Progress Totals _A 6 4 4 _2 5 _1 5 __Q 20 0 7 _12 65 I (Outage + OnLine) (2+4) (2+2) (5+0) (1+4) (16+4) (18+7) The 1998 year-end Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 68 outstanding modifications. NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion. l l D:ta Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Jaworski Trcnd: None 40 i . . . .
. 1 i NO DATA AVAILABLE l 1 1 1 1-f ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST BREAKDOWN i l This Indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering and System l Engineering. The 1998 year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum of 120 outstanding EARS. l ) NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion. )
! Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Skile/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 41
I I iI I NO DATA AVAILABLE I i iI i ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS I i NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion. I I Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Skiles Trend: None SEP 62 1 42
i 1 l l l NO DATA AVAILABLE i i l 9 i ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE OPEN 1 NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion. Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Skiles Trend: None SEP 62 l 43 l
I
#SSCs Exceeding Unavailability Criteria L._.i # SSCs Monitored
-*- % Exceeding Unavailability Criteria 70 4.5%
63 63 63 bM 51 % 51 49 50 52 , n
$ 50 - m -
' / 3.0%
$ 40 - } y <
a / l; 2.5%
$ 30 co c -
. d d' 2.0%
. 1.5%
3 / ? : T 1.0% z 10 D +7 0.5% 0-O.0% 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 2-98 3-98 Quarter I J Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability As of the third quarter of 1998, only one SSC, the non-safety related inverter, EE-4S, is exceeding it's three year unavailability performance criteria. Performance is indicative of success in Maintenance, Planning & Scheduling, and Operations efforts to control equipment out of service time. I Data Source Skiles/Swearngin/ Johnson (Manager / Source) g Accountability: Skiles E Trend: None 44 I I .\
~
O Total Requalification Training Hours F m Simulator Training Hours a Non-RequalificationTralningHours a Number of Exam Fellures 36 - 33 32 32 32 _ M 31 30 l 26 1 20 33 16 - 4 14 14 2 2 10 - 8 88 8 8 8 8 6- 4 3 0 0 0 0 00 0 - r ,- r r- ,---r- r- -- Cycle 97 6 Cycle 97 6 Cycle 97 7 Cycle 981 Cycle 98 2 Cycle 98 3 Cycle 98-4 Cycle 98-6 l l LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew l during each cycle. The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non RequaEcation Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches. Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training. Note: All examination failures were remediated without impacting the operations shift schedule. Data Source: Westcott/G uliani (Manager / Source) Accountability: Westcott/Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 45
3 SROExams Administered a SROExams Passed a ROExams Administered E3 RO Exams Passed 12 12 12 12 10 - 6 44 ; 44
- 4 0
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
, i i , l 4 i Oct Nov Deo Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 1998 This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.
During the month of September 1998, there were 4 (SRO) exams administered and 12 (RO) exams administered with no failures. Data Source: Westcott/G uliani (Manager / Source) Accountability: Westcott/Guliani Trend: Positive SEP 68 46
Q READY WOS 3 WOS ON HOLD 3 MWRS NOT YET FROCESSED 700) 0 om soo . MWD HOLDS u, 358 DATA UNAVAILABLE
, re. e45 161 II 100-59 71 0- ,- ,
JuLD8 Aug-98 Sep.98 MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE) This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in Cycle 18 RFO. This graph indicates: Parts Holds - Planning Complete, Awaiting Parts System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering Input to Planning l - Planner Holds - Maintenance Planner has not completed planning the work package. ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacement items ECN from DEN. I - In Review - Planning Complete awating SE, ISI and QC review. I NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion. I Data Source: I Accountability: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source) Sollymossy/ Herman Trend: None SEP 31 l L ~ 47
i ,g iE E L.AST EmlS OFOR ScHEDut.E 1 100
$0 -
] l 80 - f I 70 - g 80t E 60 --- . 1 8
# 40 -
30 - 20 -- .
- t-l 10 -
0-- __ M h _ I! g 5 F j r E
= 8 ig8 b n I b-
$a e 5 j j w a s>
! s s 1 !
a ! j l l COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT l AND SPECIAL SERVICES l ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1999 0UTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT I Data Source Skiles/Bloyd/Boughter (Manager / Source) Accountability: Skiles/Bloyd/Boughter Trend: None SEP 31 48
!I lI
+ ActualRCDate a Target RCDate S2699-
- 5/G99 -
4/16/99-- 3/27/99 - a e a e a a a a a a a a am99 - 2/1999 ' s ' ' '
- m s m - m o g s g , e s
8 4 8 4 E 4 E 8 ] m 8 9 8 { m 9 8 j m 4 8 i l l PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS l CYCLE 19 l l l This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling i Outage (September 1999), The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were approved for accomplishment prior to September 25,1998, PRC approved by March 18,1999. September 1998 Modifications added: 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source) Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 1 49
I I There Have Been No MODS or ECNs l added since Freeze Date I i
- PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 0UTAGE MODS AND ECN'S ADDED TO 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER l FREEZE DATE l
This indicator will show the status of Modi 5 cations and ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle 1 19 Refueling Outage. The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by I I their target date. Target date is September 25,1998. l September 1998 , 1 Modifications /ECN's Added = 0 Deleted = 0 I l Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source) Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 33 I I 50
I
+ Actual Approw Date a Target Approw Date j Sa =
Sa m .
.R ,
,g ;
I 7/3G98 qp eraw98 - 5/31/98-5/1!98 - 4/1/98 - ac/98 - 1/31/98 *~ - - - . S$$v $ 2 O E6EE$$$
88888 PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.
The goal for this indicator is to have all MOD /ECN packages approved by their scheduled date. l I l l September 1998 MOD /ECN Added:0 Deleted: 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source) I Accountability: Trend: Phelps/Jaworski None SEP 31 51
l l l l l l l ACTION PLANS I SEP INDEX i l l I I { 1 52
ACTION PLANS This section lists action plans that have been developed for the performance Indicators cited as Adverse Trends dunng the month preceding this report Also included are Action Plans for indicators that have been ested in the preceding month's report as Needing Inc. eased Management Attention in accordance with Revision 5 of NOO OP-37, for three (3) consecutive months. Adverse Trends
. Temporary Modifications (page 39)
Dased on the current trend of Temporary Modifications >S months old (removable on-lane) the Temporary Moitications Indicator is classifted as
'Needs increased Management Attention *. Presently, there are six (6) Temporary Modifications which have been installed greater than six months An action plan has been deseloped to expedite removal of the TMs and increase management's awareness of the issue System Engineenng will be advely pursuing resolution on closure of these Temporary Modifications.
Needina increased Manaaement Attention
. Emergency AC Power (page 15) , This indicator was high in July and August due to planned maintenance For the first time, diesel refueling frequency tasks were performed on line Approximately 60 hours was requ?od on each diesel for on line maintenance The decision to perform on-line maintenance was a management decision with full knowledge that unavailability would increase it is expected that unavailability will go down to previous low levels for the next 12 months.
Secondary System Chemistry (page 18) Recent chemistry analysis results indicate increased impunty concentration in our Steam Generator blowdown chemistry The Chemistry Department is investigating this trend and is considering an action plan that would include the manipulation of various systems that would require Operations Department support Some of these would include.
- Adjustments to Steam Generator blowdown
. Adjustments to Chemical Feed Securing RO unit make up to the Condensate Storage Tank for extended periods as allowed by CST level Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (page 25) i The Routine Decon Schedule was revised to :mprove the daily maintenanM of clean areas in the RCA A status sheet with a sign-off will provide administrative guidance and controls to ensure clean areas are being properly maintained by a designated responsible person These improvements should result in less Clean Controlled Area Contaminations.
- Cents Per Kilowatt Hour (page 30)
The increased cost has been due to the unexpected refueling outage extension which also caused the higher expenditures and ;he less power generated. Nuclear Planning Department has initiated cost awareness efforts by distributing the monthly update on power generation, OlM cost and Capital cost to all nuclear departments and year-to-date cost data to all nuclear personnel. In addition, the Nuclear organization is developing the 1999 Business Plan based on the Six Factor Formu!a -CHOICE to address the issues and actior.s on safs operations, high performance and competitrve cost. The effectiveness of the Business Plan will be evaluated routinely by the nuclear managen.cnt team. Radiological Work Practices Program (page 36) Changes in the Initial General Employee Training (GET) Program are being addressed by a Training Advisory Committee to make program improvements The Or>Line Poor Radiation Worker Practices were recently identifed by CR 199801434 Implementation of the Actiors items listed below are being addressed by the Condition Report, which should result in an increased awareness for improving Rad Worker Pracitices in the RCA e Detlne the role of the She RP Technician to reduce over relianace on the RP Staff and ensure Rad Workers have sutticient knowledge pnot to accessing the RCA e Perform e Human Pertbanance etatuation of the Survey Maps used by the Rad Workers
- Evaluate the effectiveness of the postings used in the RCA Evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the intbrmation provided at eh RCA Access Control Point.
Ensure the RP She Tech has the appropiate ontbrmation available. e Evaluate the content and methods of the GET Program.
- Evaluate the e.4ectiveness of the postings used in the RCA.
53
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX
- 4) Cotical means that during the steady state condition This indicator index is calculated from a weighted combination of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective of eleven performance indicator values, which include the multiplication (k , ) was essentially equal to one following: Unit Capabihty Factor, Unplanned Capabikty Loss ( Page 12)
Factor, HPSI, AFW, Emergency AC Power System, Unplanned Automatic Scrams, Collective Radiation Exposure, HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY Fuel Reliabihty, Thermal Performance, Secondary System SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Chemistry, and Industrial Safety Accident Rate. ( Page 6 ) The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavailable hours and the eshmated unavailable hours for the high I UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR pressure safety injection system for the reporting period divided by the entical hours for the reporting period multiplied The ratio of the available energy generation over a given time by the number of trains in the high pressure safety injection period to the reference energy generation (the energy that system. (Page 13) I could be produced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same AUXlLIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM time penod, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 10 ) PERFORMANCE l UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for the auxiliary The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given feedwater system for the reporting period divided by the l period of time, to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be produced if the unit were operated continuously entical hours for the reporting period multiplied by the number of trains in the auxiliary feedwater system.( Page 14 ) ct full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 11 ) EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM I PERFORMANCE UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavailable l and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the emergency AC I This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned power system for the reporting period divided by the number tutomatic scrams (RPG logic actuations) that occur per 7,000 of hours in the reporting period multiplied by the number of hours of critical operation, trains in the emergency AC power system.( Page 15) The value for this indicator is calculated by multiplying the THERMAL PERFORMANCE total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams in a l specific time period by 7,000 hours, then dividing that number The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the l by the total number of hours criticalin the same time period. adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage. The indicator is further defined as follows: ( Page 16)
- 1) Unplanned means that the scram was not an FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR I ar,:icipated part of a planned test.
This indicator is defined as the steady state primary coolant
- 2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution I reactor by a rapid insertion of negative reactivity (e g., by control rods, liquid injection system, etc.)
and normakzed to a common purification rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection intemals from previous defective fuel or is present on the system. The signal may have resulted from surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process. I exceeding a set point or spurious. Steady state is defined as continuous operation for at least three days at a powerlevel that does not vary more than + or
- 3) Automatic means that the initial signal that caused -5%. Plants should collect data for this indicator at a power actuation of the reactor protection system logic was level above 85%, when possible. Plants that did not operate provided from one of the sensor's monitoring plant at steady-state power above 85% should collect data for this parameters and conditions, rather than the manual indicator at the highest steady-state power level attained scram switches or, manual turbine trip switches (or during the month.
push-buttons) provided in the main controiroom. 54
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The density correction factor is the ratio of the specific volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature (540 degrees F., This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid Vf = 0.0217) divided by the specific volume of coolant at radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indicator normalletdown temperature (120" F at outlet of the letdown also shows the volume of low level radioactive waste which cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163), which results in a is in temporary storage, the amount of rad;oactive cil that has density correction factor for FCS equal to 1.33. ( Page 11 ) been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste which has been shipped off site for SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry INDEX active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms l generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and The Chematry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, side of the plant. These key impunties are the most likely plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at cause of deterioration of the steam generators. Criteria for a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, calculating the CPI are: sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all I radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of
- 1) The plant is at greater than 30 percent power, and spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54. ( Page 21 )
- 2) the power is changing less than 5% per day.
I RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY The CPIis calculated using the following equation: RATE CPI = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chloride /1.52) +(Su! fate /1.44) + The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per (Iron /3.30) + (Copper /0.30)+(Condensate 02/2.90))/6 200,000 man-hours worked. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP #15,25 and 26. Where: Sodium, sulfate, chloride and condensate dissolved ( Page 24 ) I oxygen are the monthly average blowdown concentrations in ppb, iron and copper are monthly time weighted average CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS 21,000 feedwater concentrations in ppb. The denominator for eaof DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA the five factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly I everage for a specific parameter is less than the INPO The personnel contamination events in the clean controlled area. This indicator tracks personnel performance for SEP median value, the median value is used in the calculation. #15 & 54. ( Page 25 ) ( Page 18) I COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator is a breakdown of LERs For purposes of LER event classification, a ' Preventable LER* is defined as Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body An event for which the root cause is personnel error (Le, I dose received by all on-site personnel (including inappropriate action by one or more individuals). Inadequate contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured by administratrve controls, a design constructon, instaflation, installat>on, the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Collective radiation fabncation problem (invoMng work completed by or supervised by exposure is reported in units of person-rem. This indicator I tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54. OPPD personnel) or a maintenance problem (attributed to inadequate or improper upkeep / repair of plant equipment). Also, the ( Page 19 ) cause of the event must have occurred within approximately two years of the " Event Date" specified in the LER (e g , an event for I INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS RATE wtiich the cause is attnbuted to a problem with the onginal design of the plant would not be Considered preventable) The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in For purposes of LER event classification, a " Personnel l improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel pOrmanently assigned to the station. Contractor work hours Error" LER is defined as follows: are not included in this indicator. Also, this indicator is An event for which the root cause is inappropriate action on d0 fined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel the part of one or more individuals (as opposed to being permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from attributed to a department or a general group). Also, the work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This inappropriate action must have occurred within does not include contractor personnel. This indicator tracks approximately two years of the " Event Date" specified in the personnel performance for SEP #25,26 & 27.(Page 20 ) LER. Additionally, each event classified as a " Personnel Error" should also be classified as "Pieventable." This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP ltem #15. ( Page 26 ) 55
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR BREAKDOWN The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical This indicator shows the number and root cause code for operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per kiloivatt Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per follows: kilowatt hour on a twelve-month average for the current year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved yearly budget.
- 1) Administrative Control Problem -
The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Management and supervisory deficiencies that Report. affect plant programs or activities (ie., poor ( Page 30 ) planning, breakdown or lack of adequate management or supervisory control, incorrect MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG procedures, etc). This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance
- 2) Licensed Operator Error This cause code 1 captures errors of omission / commission by Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month. Maintenance classifications are defined as follows:
licensed reactor operators during plant activities. Corrective Repair and restoration of equipment or components that have failed or are malfunctioning and are
- 3) Other Personnel Error -
Errors of not performing their intended function. omission / commission committed by non-licensed personnel involved in plant activities. Preventive - Actions taken to maintain a piece of I 4) equipment within design operating conditions, prevent Maintenance Problem The intent of this equipment failure, and extend its life and are performed cause code is to capture the full range of problems which can prior to equipment failure. be attributed in any way to programmatic deficiencies in the I maintenance functional organization. Activities included in Non-Corrective / Plant improvements - Maintenance this category are maintenance, testing, surveillance, activities performed to implement station improvements or calibration and radiation protection. to repair non-plant equipment. I 9) De sign / Construction /In stallation/Fa brication Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as: Problem This cause code covers a full range of programmatic deficiencies in the areas of Emergency Conditions which significantly degrade station I design, construction, installation, fabncation (i.e, loss of control power due to and safety or availability. underrated fuse, equipment not qualified for the immediate Action - Equipment deficiencies which environment, etc.). significantly degrade station reliability. Potential for unit I shutdown or power reduction.
- 6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece-Parts or Environmental-Related Failures) This Operations Concern Equipment deficiencies which code is used for spurious failures of electronic I piece-parts and failures due to meteorological hinder station operation.
conditions such as lightning, ice, high winds, Essential Routme corrective maintenance on essential etc. Generally,it includes spurious or one-time station systems and equipment. I failures. Electric components included in this category are circuit cards, rectifiers, bistables, Non-Essential Routine corrective maintenance on non-fuses, capacitors, diodes, resistors, etc in essential station systems and equipment. addition this indicator reports SEP # 6 & 61. I (Page 27) Plant improvement Non-corrective maintenance and plant improvements. VIOLATION TREND this indicator is defined as Fort Calhoun This indicator tracks maintenance performance for Station Cited Violations and Non-Cited Violations trended over SEP #36. ( Page 32 ) 12 months. Additionally, CitedViolations for the top quartile Region IV plant istrended over 12 months (lagging the Fort RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE & CalhounStation trend by 2 3 months). It is the FortCalhoun PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE Station goal to be at or below the cited violation trend for thetopquartileRegion IV plant. The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance l ( Page 28 ) testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and pr7ventive maintenance I 56
.______e
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS i 1 completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for a percentage, is calculated based on mardhours. Also Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, displayed are the percent of preventive maintenance items in Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures or the month that were not completed or administratively closed Operating by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25% of the Procedures are not considered as scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive temporary modifications unless the jumper or maintenance activities for SEP #41. ( Page 33 ) block remains in place after the test or procedure is cornplete. Jumpers and blocks PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS installed in test or lab instruments are not (MAINTENANCE) considered as temporary modifications. The number of identified incidents conceming maintenance 3) Scaffold is not considered a temporary procedural problems, the number of closed irs related to the modification. Jumpers and blocks which are use of procedures (includes the number of closed irs caused installed and for which Mrs have been by procedural noncompliance), and the number of closed submitted will 'oe considered as temporary procedural noncompliance irs. This indicator trends modifications untd final resolution of the MR and personnel performance for SEP #15,41 and 44. ( Page 34) the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings. This CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA indicator tracks temporary modifications SEP
#62 and 71.
The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which ( Page 39) includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and areas of the C/RP building, that is contaminated based on the ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) t:tal square footage. This indicator tracks performance for BREAKDOWN SEP #54. ( Page 35) This indicator shows a breakdown, by age and priority of the RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM EAR, of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear and System Engineering. This indicator tracks The number of identi."ed poor radiological work practices performance for SEP #62. ( Page 41 ) (PRWPs) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #52. ( Page 36) ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were The Document Review Indicator shows the number of completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion by documents reviewed, the number of documents scheduled for DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks review, and the number of document reviews that are overdue performance for SEP #62. for the reporting month. A document review is considered ( Page 42) ov rdue if the review is not complete within six m:nths of the assigned due date. This indicator tracks ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN performance for SEP #40. ( Page 37 ) This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering SECURITY INCIDENTS Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Tha total number of secunty incidents for the reporting month Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility d:picted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secunty Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement items open, and performance for SEP #58. ( Page 38) ECN Document Changes open. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS ( Page 43) Tha number of temporary mechanical and electrical LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING configurations to the plant's systems. The total number of hours of training given to each crew
- 1) Temporary configurations are defined as during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator training electncal jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), the jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are number of non-REQUALIFICATION training hours and the installed in the plant operating systems and are number of exam failures. This indicator tracks training not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, performance for SEP # 68. ( Page 45) schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.
57
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND ECN'S ADDED TO '99 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quizzes DATE cnd exams that are administered and passed each month. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP #68. This indicatorwill show the status of Modifications and ECN's ( Page 48) approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #33. MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 19 REFUELING ( Page 50) OUTAGE) Progress of 1998 On-Line modification Planning This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work R: quests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or l (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 18 R fueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance #31 in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998. This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31. ( Page 47) ( Page 51 ) COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEEF1NG 199800TAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31. ( Page48) PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for SE? # 31. ( Page 49) l I l l l l 58
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM lNDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performanco Indicators Index is to list performance indicators related to SEP ltems with parameters that can be trended. SEP Reference Number 16 Egggt e increase HPES and IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . 34 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . .. . . .. . .. . . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations 21,000 Disintegrations / Minute Por Probe Area . . . . 25 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs .. .. . . . . . . .. . . 26 SEP Reference Numbers 25. 26. & 27
- Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented e Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements e implement Supervisory Enforcement of Industrial Safety Standards I Industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate .
Recordable Injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . .. .,..
. 24 20 I SEP Reference Number 31
- Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 19 Refueling Outage) .. . . . . . 47 Component Testing Department. Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects . .. . .. 48 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . . . . . . . 49 Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . . 51 I
SEP Reference Number 33
- Develop On Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progross of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to '99 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date . . 50 SEP Reference Number 36
- Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) .. 32 SEP Reference Numbers 41 & 44 e Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule e Compliance With and Use of Procedures I Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance & Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance)
. . . 33
, ,.. . .. .. . 34 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review . .. .
i .37 W 59
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX SEP Reference Number 62 Eggg
. Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices RadiologicalWork Practices Program . . . . .. . .. .... . . . . 36 SEP Reference Number 64 g
- Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program 3 Collective Radiation Exposure .. .. .. . . . .
. 19 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste . . ., , . .. . .. . . 21 Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations 21,000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area 25 l Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area .. . . .. . . ..
. . 35 SEP Reference Number 58 I
- Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Security incidents ..
. . . . 38 SEP Reference Numbers 60 & 61 e improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program e Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests I Licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests resulting in Licensee Event Reports .. 27 SEP Reference Number 62
- Establish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications ... .. . .. . . . . ... .. .. . .39 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . . .
. . 41 Engineering Change Notice Status .. . .. .. . .. .. . . . 42 Engineering Change Notices Open . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . . 43 SEP Reference Number 68
- Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requalification Training . . . . .. . . . . . . .45 License Candidate Exams . . .... .. .. . . . .. . .. ... . .48 i SEP Reference Number 71
- Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications .. . . . .. . . . . .. ... . . 39 I
I W 60 _-.__2
Fort Calhoun Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates l EVENT l DATE RANGE l PRODUCTION (MWH) l CUMULATIVE (MWH) l Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/03/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 l Cycle 8 04/06/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 I Cycle 9 07/12/84-09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Cycle 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Cycle 11 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Cycle 12 01/31/89-02/17/90 3,817,954 45,569,459 Cycle 13 05/29/90-02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 Cycle 14 05/03/92-09/25/93 4,981,485 56,022,013 Cycle 15 11/26/93-02/20/95 5,043,887 61,065,900 Cycle 16 04/14/95-10/05/96 5,566,108 66,632,007 Cycle 17 11/25/97-04/01/98 5.183,108 71,815,678 Cycle 18 06/04/98-10/02/99 l CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47p.m.) l First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 I Longest Run (477 Days) June 8,1987 September 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH-Cycle 13) May 29,1990-Febmary 1,1992 I Shortest Refueling Outage (53 days) February 20,1995-April 14,1995 [ October 4,1996-November 27,96 [ 61
.2
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SOURCES WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ARE IN BLUE Indicator Source Extension INPO Noteworthy /Significant Events . .. . .. . . ... . .. ,,
. Donna Guinn 6937 Unit Capability Factor Unplanned Capability Factor Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams per 7000 Hours Critical . . .. . Mike Edwards 6929 High Pressure Safety injection System Safety System Performance . . . . . . Chuck Schaffer 6830 Auxiliary Feedwater System Safety System Performance . . . . . . Craig Fritts 6554 Emergency AC Power System Safety System Performance . .. . . . Rich Ronning 6887 Thermal Performance . . Kevin Naser
. . . . ... . . ... 6889 Fuel Releability Indicator . . .
. ... . . Rich Roenigk 7214 Secondary System Chemistry . . . Mark Ostien 7109 Industrial Safety Accident & Disabling injuryllliness (Lost Time Accident Rate)
Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate . Duane Booth 6558 Collective Radiation Exposure Clean Controlled Area Contaminations Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area Radiological work Practices Program . . . . . . . . ... . .. . .. . .. . Colette Williams 7163 Volume of Low-Level Radioactive Waste . . . ... . Mark Breuer 7193 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown . Erick Matzke 6855 Violation Trend . .. . . . .. . .., . . .. . Gary Cavanaugh 6913 Main ** nance Rule SSC Unavailability . . . .. . .. Steve Sweamgin 6836 CCnts Per Kilowatt Hour . . . . . .,... . . . Claudio Huang 6626 62
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SOURCES l l Indicator Source Extension _ 1 M:Intenance Workload Backlog i Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Preventive Maintenance items Overdue H' MWD Planning Status (Cycle 18 Refueling Outage) , , . Martin Johnson 6956 P;rsonnel Error Rate Procedural Noncompilance incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . Mike Burggraf 6675 l - Document Review . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . Judy P'ath 7370 J 4
- Security incidents . ... . .. . . . . . . Al Clark 6666 I
4 Temporary Modifications . . . . .. . ... .. . . .. . . . . Russ Plott 6557 l 1
- Outstanding Modifications Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19
- Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECNS Added to 1999 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date Progress of 1998 ON-Line Modification Planning . . . .... .. Pat Walling 6950 Engineering Assistance Request Breakdown Engineering Change Notice Status
- Engineering Change Notice Open . . .. . .. . . . . Bemie Livingston 3870
- Lic nstd Operator Requalification Training i Lic
- nse Candidate Exams 1998 . . . . .. .. . . . . Greg Guliani 6025 1
- Component Testing Department and Special Services Engineering Department 1999 Outage Projects Status Report .. . . . . . . Chris Boughter 6684 I .
63
-. . .}}