ML20236G810
| ML20236G810 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1998 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236G805 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9807060397 | |
| Download: ML20236G810 (65) | |
Text
_ _ _ . . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION s;ny ,
- hjNib W *4x '^. -
kii,iim. ,1 ki
- . Mw[ & -
klgi .g,,'"
W s.
,. /,! k. . !d, f ' ' l ., j :'fii c T'#
fd-St* -
'"4"k4--
, 'i SMd6d/My ^$;bkhe;d. . - - ' -Q ,'7.Oli:..."Q{%p; - % .3 j ! y q, e ,g.y ::*},gy!)N W ie Q%j y;4q >- .
.QgQy. ....g_
- w. :s ll, .
' f j.
Il'l>
I PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MAY 1998 SAFE OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE COST EFFECTIVENESS 9007060397 980626 PDR ADOCK 05000285 R PDR
Table of Contents / Summary ease TABLE OF CONTENTS /
SUMMARY
. . . . .. .. 1 MONTHLY
SUMMARY
REPORT . . . ... . 4 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND . . . . ... 5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR ,. . , .. .. , ,6 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT
SUMMARY
,. . 7 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS . . . . . . . .. 8 1
WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Unit Capability Factor . . . .. .. . . 10 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor . . .. . . . .. . . 11 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS per 7000 Hours 12 High Pressure Safety injection System . ... . . .. 13 Auxiliary Feedwater System .. . . .. . .. . .. . . . 14 l
Emergency AC Power System .. . .. . ... . . . . . . 15 Thermal Performance . . .. .. . . .. . . 16 I
Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17
- Secondary System Chemistry . . .. . .. . . . . . . 18 Collective Radiation Exposure .. . . . . .. . . . 19 Industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate . .. . 20 Volume of Low Level Radbactive Waste .. .. . . 21 SAFE OPERATIONS Recordable injury / illness Cases Frequency Rate . . 23 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations l P1,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area . . , , 24 I
i E-_____----- - - _ - -
(-- -
i Table of Contents / Summary l Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . .. . . . . . 25 Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown . . . .. 26 Violation Trend . .. . . .. . . . 27 1 COST
)
Cents Per Kilowatt Hour . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . 29 l 1
DMSION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS t-t Maintenance
( Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) .. . . . . . 31
- l. Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance .. . . .. . 32 l Procedural Noncompliance incidents .. .. . 33 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . .. . . 34 Radiological Work Practices Program . . .. 35 Document Review ... . . . .. .. . . . . . 36 Security Incidents . .. . .. . . .. ... .. . .. .. . 37 .
l l Temporary Modifications . .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. 38 l 4
l Outstanding Modifications . . .. . .... . . .. .. . .. . . 39 j Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . . . .. .. 40 l Engineering Change Notices l Status part 1 .. . . . . ... . . .. . . .. 41 l Status part 2 . .. . ..... . . ... .. 42 l Open part 1 . .. , . . . . . 43 l Open part 2 . ... . . . . .. 44 Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . .. . . . . 45 Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability .. .. . . . . 46 Licensed Operator Requalification Training .. . . 47 License Candidate Exams . . . . . . 48 t
! Cycle 19 Refueling Outage
( MWD Planning Status . . . . . 49 l Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage . 50 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . . . . 51 Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECte Added to 1999 Refueling Outage After Freeze 52 i
f.
2
Table of Contents / Summary Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . 53 ACTION PLANS. DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX & DISTRIBUTION LIST Action Plans . . . 55 Performance Indicator Definitions .
. 56 Safety Enhancement Program Index 61 Current Production and Operations " Records"/ Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates 63 Report Distribution List . . . 64 i
I 3
FORT CALHOUN STATION Monthly Summary OPERATIONS During May 1998, the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) remained shutdown for the 1998 refueling ar.d maintenance outage. Fuel was loaded into the reactor vessel, the reactor vessel head was installed and containment was closed out in preparation for plant startup. Numerous survedlance tests, inspe:tions, and maintenance items were completed. Testing on the steam driven Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) pt mp FW-10, resulted in an overspeed condition and over pressurization of the AFW piping.
Subsequently, the Plant Review committee approved a modification of the control circuitry for FW 1') to cnsure that over pressurization of the AFW piping does not recur. Plant startup was delayed pendin ;
cnalysis of the event and installation of the modification. FCS is scheduled to retum to power in early June 1998.
- WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l
The overall WANO Performance Index was 80% during the 1st Quarter of 1998. Significant percentage point losses are attributed to the following WANO Performance Indicators listed below: I l 1. The Unit Capability FactorIndicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 2.4 i l point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on page 10.
- 2. The Unplanned Capability Loss FactorIndicator calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 6.4 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on pages 10 and 11.
i .
l 3. The Fuel Reliability Indicator calculated over the previous 3 months, contributed to a 8.0 point ;
l loss due to increased reactor coolant activity caused by fuel defects on page 17. l l !
- 4. The Thermal Performance indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.9 point loss due to thermal energy losses experienced during reactor power changes and force d outages defined on Pages 10 and 16.
- 5. The Collective Radiation Exposure Indicator; calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 1.0 point loss, which was attributed to fuel failures and recent high exposure jobs j such as resin shipment and work on AC-7, " Storage Pool Demineralized" on page 19.
- 6. The Emergency AC PowerIndicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 0.6 point loss, which was a result of on-line maintenance and replacement of relays under ECN95-347, l " Replace Relays for Seismic Adequacy' on page 15.
l
- 7. The Chemistry Performance Inder Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 1.4 point loss, which is due to copper tubes in heat exchangers and mechanical shock to systems in the past year from forced outages defined on page 18.
l 4
l l.
i l
EIlllllll3 Fort Calhoun index value l -*-- WANo Median index Value l FCS GOAL 90%
91.0 --
88.9 --
86.4 86.4 86.4 86 4 l 86.8 --
84.7 --
J 8 2.6 -- .'
$ 80.5 --
78.4 - - ,
~~ 1x 76.3 -- h i S i 74.2 -- g s
'2'--
70.0 $l l 6 "/ ;
i'" -
l -)'i -
97/2 97/3 97/4 98/1 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND The Wano Performance Index Trend calculation is made up of eleven variables, each value is weighted to arrive at an overall index value. WANO calculates the performance index value based on the industry reporting the information each quarter. The variables are calculated over a defined period of time as listed below.
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR WEIGHTED FACTOR TIME Unit Capability Factor 16 24 Months ,
Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 24 Months !
High Pressure Safety injection 10 24 Months Auxiliary Feedwater 10 24 Months Emergency AC Power 10 24 Months Unplanned Auto Scrams /7000 Hours 8 24 Months Collective Radiation Exposure 8 24 Months Thermal Performance Indicator 6 12 Months Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 12 Months Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 12 Months L Fuel Reliability Indicator 8 Quarterly 5
1 18.00 8 16.00 - o 3 M AXlM UM V A L UE E Fourth Otr'97 m First Qtr '98 o
14.00 - Y 8 U
' oo oo b8$ $$b o$?o 10.00 -
"de )
g ggg g i 8.00 - o O g ~ ~ o 80 0 e00 ui .$ o*5 888 i i i i i i i i i i i UCF UCLF HPSI AFW EACP CRE UAS7 FRI CPI TPI ISAR i
l WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS This graph shows the dfference between Fourth Qtr '97 and First Qtr'98 actual values achieved by Fort Calhoun.
l CALCULATED OVER A 2 YEAR PERIOD MAXIMUM VALUE TREND j UCF Unit Capability Factor 16 increase
- UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 increase HPSI High Pressure Safety injection 10 No Change AFW Auxiliary Feedwater 10 No Change EACP Emergency AC Power 10 No Change UAS7 Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hours 10 No Change CRE Collective Radiation Exposure 8 No Change CALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD
, TPI Thermal Performance indicator 6 increase l CPI Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 increase l lSAR Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 No Change i
CALCULATED OVER A QUARTERLY PERIOD FRI Fuel Reliability indicator 8 Decrease 6
f l
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
SUMMARY
REPORT POSITIVE TREND REPORT ADVERSE TREND REPORT I
l A perfonnanz indcator wth data representing three consecubve A performance indcator with data representing three i montit0 of improving performance or three consecutwo montns of consecutive rnonths of declining performance or three mnsecutwe performance that is superor to the stated god i. exht) Ring a postwo months of performance that is trendng toward declining as determined trend per Nuclear Operabons Division Quairty Procedure 37 (NOD- by the Manager. Nuclear Licensing. consttutes an adverse trend per QP-37). The fo8owing performance indcators exhibned postwe Nuclear Operatens Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD QP-37). A trends forthe reporting month: supervsor whose performance indica'or exhibts an adverse trend by this defintion may specify in wntten form (to be pubhshed in this Unoianned Automate Raw *ar Scrams report) why the trend a not adverse,The following performance (Page 12) indicators exhibited adverse trends for the reporting mwA Hiah Pensmure Safety iniection Svatem Safetv Svstem Performance (Page 13) h Aux Feed Water Svatem Safety Svntam P.A nw INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT (Page 14) ATTENTION REPORT Ememency AC Power Svntem Safety Performanm A performance indcator wth data for the reporting penod that is (Page 15) inadequate when compared to the OPPD goal is defined as Needing l
Increased Management Attention *per (NOD-OP-37).
Thermal Performance !
(Page 16) Cinan Contro8ed Area Contaminations (Page 24)
ContamindM RM*nn Contmlied Area Maintenance Workload Backtoo (Page 31)
(Page 34)
Ratio of Preventwe to Tota! Maintenance PreventNe Mantanance hns Ovedue (Page 32)
Temocrarv Men 2, (Page 38) l i.
I f
a i
7
E Significant D Noteworthy 16 - 14 14 - -
12 - i 10 - 7 7 8- 5 -
6- 3 4
4- >
1 2 -
1 2- 0 0 0 . . . , , ,
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Not: worthy /Significant events at FCS are classified by INPO to identify precursors to events.
Th:re were 3 Noteworthy and 0 Significant Events during the month of May 1998.
Significant Events for May 1998: !
None Noteworthy Events since Start of INPO Cycle:
- Containment Hydrogen Panel Components Exceed Qualified Life Due to incorrect Calculation Assumptions l
. Transformer Fault and Loss of Off-Site Power While Shutdown Due to inadvertent l Actuation of Transformer Deluge System l
= Degraded Steam Generator Tube Left in Service Due to Personnel Error I
. Reactor Coolant Pump Cavitation During Planned Pressure Reduction Drta Source: Tills /Guinn (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Tills /Guinn Trand: None i
I 8
L
l l WANO PERFORMANCE IN'DICATORS l l l
f 9
l u __
Monthly Unit Capability Factor --o-- 24 Month Unit Capability Factor 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (87.5%) .-e-- Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (87%)
300.0 % -
250.0 % - - - " _ ;" - - - - - - - - ----
200.0% -
150.0 % -
$ffP j f gf8 $$ $ 1998 RFo 100.0 % - [3i S___
E-5 5 f _8 (
~
5 ~
3gE 3if '-
8: :
sR
~ ~ -
~
50.0% - gg 0.0% .
EE4,*555445.44a E4E 4, : ;44E; $N& a
. a . - - , o .- 5,.
4 5- E& 4 E 5N$5 5 E&
UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy generation over the same time period, expressed as a percentage.
UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 57.1 % 90.6 % 74.0 % 80.0 %
Enerav Losses:
Forced Outage-Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Event Period: September 10, thru13,1997.
Power Reduction- Faculty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Event Period: August 26,28,1997.
Forced Outage- Circumferential cracking of a weld down stream of a moisture separator due to high system stresses Event Period: May 28, thru May 29,1997.
Forced Outage- Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system Event Period: April through mid May 1997.
The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 87% and the current industry median value is approximately 83.6%.
The maximum index point value for this indicator is 16.00. At the end of the First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 13,6 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 13.5.
Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Chase Trend: None 10
E:"""3 Monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor - o- 24-M onth Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (3.5% ) --*-- Year 2000 W AN O Industry Goal (3.00% )
1998 RFO 00% -
- g t
r -
00% -
00% -
00% -
3 00% -
g
$$$M (og$ gg $gl 2 p- = = $
00% - _
4 N_$ $? : =
p
p p = = = = _== = =_---- .
4 4444 444 442 4444 4444 4 4 4 k3?E8EEk$kkEkA$a{45E8k$ eke UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the Year 2000 WANO goal. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not produced as a result of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to causes under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they are not scheduled at least four weeks in advance.
UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 9.27 % 7.57 % 10.5% 7.7%
The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 3% and the industry current best quartile value is approximately 3.2%. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 12.00. At the end of the First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.6 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 5.4.
Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Chase Trend: None 11
0 12-M:: nth Rolling Avsr:gn
-+- FCS Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critical for last 36 months l Fort Calhoun Goal (0.0)
-Hs- Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (1)
-m- FCS Reactor Scrams -1997-98 2 --
l 1:: = = = = = = = = = = = !
1998 j
. ,. _NO l
0 :- = = = = = = = = = = =
June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May l
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL i i
The graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD goal for 1998 cnd the Year 2000 WANO goal. Also the graph shows the number of Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. There were no Unplanned Automatic !
Reactort, during the month of May 1998. The 12-month rolling average (June 1997 through I Mr 1998) was 0. An unplanned automatic reactor SCRAM occurred in August 1995; therefore, ths 36-month value (June 1995 through May 1998) was 0.292. j The Year 2000 WANO industry goalis a maximum of one Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scram p r 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> critical. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 8.0. At the end of the First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 vclue of 8.0.
Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Accountability: Chase Trend: Positive 12 l
I i
l i i Monthly HPSI System Unavailability Value
--*- 12 Month Rolling Average l
Fort Calhoun Goal (0.003)
-e- Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (0.02) 0.02 -- : : : : : : : : : : : :
0.015 -- I 0.01 --
0.005 -- 1998 RFO j 0 1 1 1 ,1 , l : : : : : : : : : : : '
l l June July Aug Osp Oct Nov Dec Jan Fel- Mar Apr May l l
1 HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM l SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE i This indicator shows the H gh Pressure Safety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, as defined by
'#ANO in the Safety System Performance indicator Definitions, for May 1998.
Tha HPSI System unavailability value for the month of May 1993 was 0.0. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of pirnned unavailability, and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability. The 12 month rolling average was
"(June 1997 through May 1998) was 0.00, and the year-to-date HPSI unavailability value was 0.00 at the l cnd of the month. For the previous year there was a total of 9.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of planned unavailability and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability for the HPSI system.
Th31998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.003. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 0.020. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 10.0.The First Quarter 1 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 10.0.
D:ta Source: Phelps/Schaffer (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Schaffer
! Trend: Positive i
13
l
-e-12 Month AFW Unavailability Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01) !
Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (0.020) l 0.025 -- 1 '
O.02 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .
0.015 --
0.009 0.01 --
0.005 1998 RFo 0.005 -
e a m- --
-e -o 0.002 0.002 0.002 'a- e 0.001 e a '
0 ! , f 0 0 9 June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 4 This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of May 1998.
Ths AFW System Unavailability Value for May 1998 was 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of I pt:nned and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month. The 12 month rolling average (June 1997 through May 1998) was 0.0024, and the year-to-date unavailability value was 0.0017 at the end of May 1998. t Th31998 Fort Calhoun Station year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.01.
Th3 Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 0.020. The maximum index point value for this indicator I is 10.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Fourth l Quarter 1997 value of 10.0. l D:ta Source: Phelps/Fritts (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Fritts Trend: Postive 14
m M o n th ly E m e rg e n c y Ac P o w e r U n a vaila bility Valu e
-m- Y e a r-to-D a te E m e rg e n c y Ac P o w e r U n a va ila bility Va lu e F o rt C alh o u n G o a l (0.0 2 4 )
-4,-. Y e a r 2 0 0 0 W AN O In d u s try G o a l (0.0 2 5 )
0.03 -
0.025 - = = = = = = = = = = = =
0.02 -
Cf -
0.015 - g y 5 0.01 - m'"
N" 0.005 -
0 IN l l 5 ? 5 N $ k A $ $ 8 $ $
EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of May 1998.
The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for May 1998 was 0.0. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date was 0.006 and the value for the last 12 months (June 1997 through May 1998) was 0.012.
Monthly Statistics Planned Unavailabilltv: DG-1: 0.0 DG-2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTD: 47.1 Hours Unolanned Unavailability: DG-1: 0.0 DG-2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTD: 00.0 Hours The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.024. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 0.025. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 10.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 9.4 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 9.4.
Data Source: Phelps/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Ronning Trend: Positive 15
m Monthly Thermal Performance i i 12-Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (99.7%)
-*- Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (99.6%)
~
8 8 8 8 1998
$ $ $ $ 8 8 8 o 8 RFO
~ ~
99% --
98% ; F ; '
l l l l ; ;
June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May THERMAL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the monthly Thermal Performance Value, the rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the Year 2000 WA.NO goal.
The thermal performance value for the month of May was 00.0%. The year to date value was reported as 99.9%. The 12 month rolling average (June 1997 through May 1998) was reported as 99.9%.
The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is an index value which is > 99.7%. The
- Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 99.6%.
I l
The maximum index point value for this indicator is 6.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.7 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 5.5.
Data Source: Phelps/Naser(Manager / Source) l Accountability: Phelps/Naser Trend: Positive l
16
m Fuel Reliability (E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)
-e- Year 2000 WANO Goal (5 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)
A End of1998 Goal (17.3 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram) 236 250 -- p
$ 200 --
3 j 150 - 131 u
j 100 -- 1998 E WO 50 -- '
$ O O O , ; ,
2 2 ,
2 ;
2 ;
2 ,
2 ,
2 2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The monthly Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) for May 1998 was Not Reportable due to the 1998 RFO. The purpose of the FRl is to monitor indastry progress in achieving and maintaining a high level of fuel int::grity. An effective fuel integrity and performance monitoring program provides a means to detect fuel frilures and assess the fuel failure number, physical condition, exposure, mechanism, and location.
1 I
W;stinghouse was selected to provide failed fuel inspection services consisting of sipping and ultrasonic t: sting. As of the end of May the task had not been completed.
Th3 maximum index point value for this indicator is 8.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value w:s 0.0 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 0.3.
l Data Source: Guinn/Roenigk (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Stafford Trcnd: None 17
(___-_____-_______-_-___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
C""1 Monthly Chemistry Indicator 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (1.1) 3 --
2.43 2.5 --
2-- h'*
y q
1.5 -- 1.32 u2 5 1.13
{
- f%
1.05 1.1 1.1 11 1 11 1.04 c 1
- p. Q , n 2 , ; x % q
- Si q$l I i YE W
g
'll?
t O
e
[M. p[ $
R $p gygg 0.5 -- y
.'h.
9 @q n(.
r_, e v~
W w %
g y
t S
g RFO
, b 3 f :
0 0
! 0 l
- ; l l
l June July Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May l
l SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY Steady state plant conditons required for calculating the Secondary System Chemistry P;rformance Index (CPI) are as follows:
Plant in Refueling Outage No CPI Determination The CPI for May 1998 is 0.00. The CPI value for the past 12 months (June 1997 through May 1998) was 1.30 The CPI value in the industry's upper quartile is 1.17. Six parameters are used in the CPI calculation. Four of the parameters were below the WANO mean value which are as follows: 1) steam generator chloride, 2) sulfate, 3) feedwater iron, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. Slight increase in CPI observed this month due to power reduction for work on Stator Cooling Heat Exchangers. Morpholine injection began this month for iron reduction. Results of analysis are inconclusive at this time. Trending continues.
The maximum index point value for this indicator is 7.00. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5,60 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 5.0.
Data Source: Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)
Accountability Hamilton Trend: None 18
CRE Pe r sonne l Based on TLD QTRS M MritPeanrdRabenEgostse(ED)
FCS Goal 224 REM - AnmkedEgostse8mfmEDReaty 2D -
225 - 2D--
0 N
200 - 3 175 -
g 150' 125 - m 100 - 1T R 75 - e 8 $
50 -
25 -
2 m- . 8 5 g }
O * - =
n ._
1 2 3 4 3 g , 3 g g g COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE The 1998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhoun Station was established for a Total Dose of 224.0 person-rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are obtained. The exposure for May 1998 was 65.318 Person-rem (ED).
Dose FCS Goal Person- First Otr. Second Third Otr. Fourth Qtr.
Rem Otr.
Total 224.0 15.560 Person-Rem Th2 total 3 year CRE value, from the First Quarter 1996 through the Fourth Quarter of 1997, w:s 505.233 Person-Rem which averages out t'o 168.411 Person-Rem per year. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal for Collective Radiation Exposure is 107 person-rem per year. The m ximum index point value for this indicator is 8.00. The First Quarter 1997 the FCS CRE Vclue was 7.0 compared to the Fourth Quarter 1997 CRE Valce of 7.0.
Data Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP 54 1
19
CD Monthly industrial safety Accident & Disabling injury /lllness Rate
--*--- 12 Month Rolling Average FCs Ye ar-End Goal (<0.40)
--e-- Year 2000 WANo industry Goal (<0.40) 1-0.9 -
0.8 -
0.7 -
0.6 -
f Q m 5 = = = = = = =N =
=,
0.3 - ^
~
0.2 - S d
~
d d d d dN q q <j x June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
Th3 purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in the indicator. This indicator is defined as the number of accidents per 200,000 work-hours worked for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station that result in any of following:
one or more days of restricted work (excluding the day of the accident.)
One or more days away from work (excluding the day of the accident.)
Fatalities.
ISAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fatalities) x 200.000 (number of station person-hours worked)
The Fort Calhoun Station Industrial Safety Accident Rate and Disabling injury / Illness Frequency )
Rr.te was 0.33 for the month of May 1998. The 12 month rolling average (June 1997 through May 1 1998) was 0. The year to date value was 1 at the end of May 1998. There was no restricted-time cnd no lost-time accident in May 1998.
The maximum index point value for this indicator is 5.0. The First Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.0 which compares to the Fourth Quarter 1997 value of 5.0. The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-cnd goalis 50.40. The Year 2000 WANO industry goalis 50.40.
l Drta Source: Sorensen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)
Chase / Booth (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trcnd: None SEP 25,26 & 27 20 w-- -
l E
B Monthly Volume of LLRW(cu.ft.)
3 Year-to-Date Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried 300 --
200 --
~ o R E E
$ 0 $ $ #
l 2 b
88 3 -
100 --
o 0 1 I
! S IY I 8
I I I I l l - 1 l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator shows the volume of the monthly Radioactive Waste buried and the cumulative year-to-date radioactive waste buried. The Fort Calhoun goalis 800 cu.ft.
Ft m8 Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site fo.r processing during current month : 4622.0 129.91 Volume of solid radwaste buried during May 1998 : 000.0 000.00 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1998 : 148.8 4.21 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage : 000.0 0.00 The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 30 cubic meters (1,071 cubic feet) per year. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 27.33 cubic meters (965.3 cubic feet) per year. -
Data Source: Chase /Breuer (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP54 21
i I
SAFE OPERATIONS Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear organization.
Individuals demonstrate professionalism through self-i ownership and personalinitiative and open communication.
l l
22
Monthly Recordable injury / Illness Rate 199 8 F.C.S. Goal (1.5) i 1.6 -
1.2 -
0.8 - 0.63 P 0.43 0.4 - 4 0.33 0 . . . . . , , , , , ,
Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if personnel from any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid.
The recordable injury / illness case numbers for the month of May 1998 was none. The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.
D:ta Source: Sorensen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Gebers !
Tr:nd: None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 23
E Contamination Events (Monthly) {
- O Contamination Events (YTD) 90 -
80 -
70 -
i r 80 -
50 -
40 - 38 I 30 -
23 7 9 20 - 16 2 8I '
10 - 7 h O Y T ,l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jus Aug sep oct Nov Dec i
l CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for contaminations >1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for May 1998.
l Th:re were 38 personnel contamination events in May 1998. The total year-to-date of l Personnel events is 70 at the end of May 1998. This indicator has been classified as "Needing increased Management Attention," due to an upward trend of Year to date contamination Cv:nts over the past three months.
D:ta Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)
Accountability : Chase /Gebers Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 15 & 54 24 i
L____________.____ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
35
- g. --+-Total Events 18 Month Totals , .
--o- Preventable 'M -
1 25 -+- Personel Error ,
20 7 10 i N _ _
1 A A A A A 4F- N- 7 7p- - l
~ ~ ~
5- i 0
Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb. Mar- Apr- May- Jun. Jul-97 Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Fets Mar. Apr.
96 96 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 l
PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs.
The graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnei Error LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the >
LER event date as opposed to the LER report date.
In April 1998, there was one (1) event which was subsequently reported as an LER. One LER was categorized as " Preventable" and One LER was categorized as " Personnel Error" during the month of April. The total LERs for the year 1998 are three. The total Personnel Error LERs for the year 1998 are one.
The year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values fo r the 18-month totals not to exceed 5 Preventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs.
NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.
D2ta Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase Tr;nd: None SEP 15 25
i C Admin 13% ..
21 %
'MVP .
1 +..r;g%,,!(
j ' {. , ,O
[N hkJ g -
Lo Err, Design '8%
32 % {;p Y
13%
feint.
8%
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by event date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the p:st eighteen months from November 1,1996, through April 30,1998. To be consistent with the Preventable / Personnel Error LERs indicator, this indicator is reported by the LER event date, as opposed to the LER report date.
The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed d:scriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.
NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-month behind.
There was one event in April 1998 that resulted in an LER. There were no missed surveillance tests resulting in LERs during April 1998. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for this indicator is 0.
D:ta Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 26
% 81 SU m FCS Cited Violations (Mon:bly)
M FCS Non-Cited Violations (Monthly)
D 8 e -
p g 4 g 10 -
g 1s
]v i
g-9 8
g E s -t, ,l- 7 -
8 e E m. . 4 d- m e E E . J L 3 4 m
( l c{-Q- Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 3s 1I .
I VIOLATION TREND
\
This indicator depicts twelve months of violation data for Fort Calhoun Station. Illustrated monthly are Cited Violations and Non-Cited Violations. The current SALP cycle began on August 3,1997 and ends on January 30,1999.
The following inspecti:.n reports noting violations were received during May 1998:
Violation Level IER No. Title IV (1) NCV (0) 98-07 ISI Program (5/21/98)
To date, OPPD has received thirty seven violations for inspections completed in the current SALP cycle. Two (2) Level IV violations received in August 1998, and three (3) Level IV violations received in October 1998, were carried over from the previous SALP cycle due to a lag in the reporting process.
Levellli Violations 1 Level IV Violations 18 Non-Cited Violations 10___
Total 37 The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the top quartile plants in Region IV.
Data Source: Tills /Cavanaugh (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Tills Trend: None 27
l l
l COST l Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that cost l effectively maintains nuclear generation as an l economically viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line.
l Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the l organization.
l l
l i
t 28
l~ l l l l I
--* - Actual --m-- Budget -*-- Plan 4.00 -
l 3.50
- o
! 3.00
= = = = = =
j -
2.s0 -
}
I 2.00 l
1.60 l
1.00 '
l -? 444 %5agg ; g5g ag gg gggg l
555554$5 IiiliA855 l
l CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR April 1998 The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved 1998 revised budget. The basis for the actual curve is the j Financial and Operating Report.
The December 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1993 through 1997. In addition, the report shows the l
plan amounts for the years 1999 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the Nuclear Long Range Financial Plan and the 1998 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels.
The 12-month rolling average unit price period of ( May 1997 through April 1948) averaged above budget due to the refueling outage expenses and less generation during the period . The 12 month rolling average is 2.84 cenis per kilowatt hour.
l The year-to-date average is trending in a positive directon Cents ner KWH Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aue Sao Oct Nov Dee Budget Y-T-D 3.02 2.85 3.27 4.13 3.81 3.53 3.36 3.19 3.09 3.04 2.97 2.92 l
Actual Y-T-D 2.96 2.85 3.00 3.26 l NBTE: The April" Actual Cost" is lower than expected due to the outage expenses in which some were prepaid and
! some have not had the invoices in yet. This information lags by one month due to corporate accounting process.
I i- Data Source: Belek/ Huang (Acting Manager / Source)
Accountability Tesar Trend: None r
29 I
u__________ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ __ _ . - _ - _ . _ _
DIVISION AND l DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power production.
30
m Corrective Maintenance m Preventive Maintenance Q Non Corrective / Plant improvements Fort Calhoun Goal (200) 1000 --
713 800 -- 763 692 636 557 666 696 644 592 538 600 -- 671 400 --
~_
200 -- -
0 ' ' ' ' ' ' '
Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May Non outage Maintenance Work Document Backlog PERCENT OF MWD'S PAST GOAL BY PRIORITY g TcedNyn PRI - 2 PRI - 3 m g 0% 87.1 %
Sp. .
4D .
3D .
'O 1 g g 66.2 % PR l 1 Rot /1 Rbty2 Rbt/ 3 Rbty4 Rbly5 MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month. It also includes a breakdown by maintenance classification and priority. The 1998 goal for this indicator is 200 non-outage corrective maintenance MWDs.
The current backlog of corrective MWDs is 350 to ensure that the MWD backlog is worked in a timely manner, non-outage maintenance completion goals have been established as follows:
G.Qal Priority 1 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Priority 2 7 days Priority 3 30 days Priority 4 90 days Priority 5 As resources permit The Corrective Maintenance workload backlog goal is 200 for 1998.
Data Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 36 31 1
3
t I
l <
Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 100 % - 90%
77 % 74 % 76 % % 79 % 75 % 75 %
00 % 74 % 74 %
- hl 61 %
y@ Q q
., b p, } q p 59%
60% s I ^(
M Rl ,,, fi -
40% b N e g p<; g q w g3 ? g ;,
, d I , h bl h h. k k June July Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May l Preventive Maintenance items overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2%
7% --
6.02 %
6% -- 5.50 %
i i i June July Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May l
l l
RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE 1
Ths top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total l completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 59% for tha month of May 1998.
l l Tha lower graph shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that were l not completed by the late finish date. From the period of April 15th thru May15th there were l 3PMk that were completed late or not completed out of 373 scheduled.
l Th31998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue is a maximum of 2%.
D:ta Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Clemens Tr:nd: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 41 & 44 l
32
Human Performance CRs (Maintenance) 20 --
18 --
16 16 --
u 14 --
E y 12 -- 1.1 N
y 10 --
O y 8--
$ G--
4-- 3 2 2 2-- 1 1 1 0 : l l l l l ": l l Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number of Condition Reports related to procedural noncompliance incidents assigned to the Maintenance Department.
The increase in procedural noncompliance over the past two months is attributed to the refueling outage and the increase in maintenance activities. This is not yet considered a negative trend. A decrease is expected to occur during June.
Data Source: Clemens/Burggraf (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 33
l m.- Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (5%)
l 6% -- I 5% - 48% 4.8% 48% 4.8% 4.8%
4% --
l 3% --
2% --
I i 1% --
0% ! I I I i i i I i i I l Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug sep Oct Nov Dec CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that is contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of May 1998, the total contaminated area was 3383 square feet which is 4.8 percent of the RCA . The monthly FCS goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area.
l l .D:ta Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)
L Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trcnd: Positive SEP54 l 34 l
I m Monthly Poor R diaton Work:r Practices l m Total PRWPfor 1998 l 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (<20) i 25 -
20 -
15 - 13 10 -
5' 0
33 Jan i
0 3
Feb i
0 3
Mar i 11 Apr i
May i
June i
July i--
Aug Sep i
Oct e - i Nov Dec i
RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological l Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. i The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. This indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 month increasing trend of poor r:diation worker practices based on YTD.
During the month of May, there was 1 PRWP identified.
There have been a total of 14 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998.
The 1998 FCS goal is <20 PRWPs, the 1997 goal was <15 PRWPs.
D:ta Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Chase /Gebers Tr;nd: None SEP52 35
I i B Documents Scheduled for Review 3 Document Reviews complete during month O Documents Overdue l 300 --
250 --
200 --
-;- a
! June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May 1997-1998 i
DOCUMENT REVIEW l
The Document Review indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue l (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.
! The documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site i
Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the l Operating Manual. l l During May 1998, there were 126 document reviews scheduled, while 26 reviews were l completed. At the end of the month, there were 38 document reviews more than 6 months I overdue. There were 3 new documents initiated during May 1998.
l Data Source: Ponec/Plath (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Ponec Trend: None SEP 46 1
1 36
39 30 --- -
26 --
(
20 -- - - ih.
sg __
g' N., "
/
\' ,
.10 -- -
g . .
0 ,
, 4 i - - ' - -- r ' --- - ; -- j - - ' t ' i JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 98 Loggables 98 N on-Loggables 97 Loggables - - + - - 97 N on-Loggables SECURITY INCIDENTS The Loggable and Non-Loggable incident (Security)lndicators are depicted in the chart above, it depicts the total number of loggable and non-loggable human error events and system failures which occurred during the reporting month.
During the month of May 1998, there were 29 loggable incidents and 16 non-loggable incidents identified (excluding access denials). 44% of all incidents identified this month were human error events. Of loggable events,38% were human performance errors and 62% were system failures. 44% of the loggable system failures were environmental. There were twenty (20) human error events, six (6) of those being internal. There were four (4) security force error events during the reporting period and two error events in access authorization, none of which wem loggable. There were three (3) access denials during the reporting period, none of which were loggable. Human Performance continues to be a departmental focus.
This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58.
Data Source: Sefick/ Clark (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Sefick Trend: None SEP 58 37
I m Temporary Modifications >1-fuel cycle old (RFO required for removal) ;
m Temporary Modifications >6 months old (Removable on-line)
- Fort Calhoun Goals for both Temporary Modifications' categories 1
2.5-22 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 i lllllllllll 0 ' -- - -- -- - - --
l June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May l
}
TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the number of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of TMs removable on-line that are greater than six months old. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goals for both of the TM categories are zero.
At the end of May 1998, there were no TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for removal.
At the end of May 1998, there was two (2) TMs installed that was greater than six months old that could be removed ;
on-line. TM 96-039, Railroad Siding / Corridor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996. EAR 97-219 will close this TM. EAR 97-219 requires Component Testing review and approval. EAR 97-219 is expected to be completed by Jznuary 1,1999. TM 97-012, Seal Water Supply to CW-1 A, was installed June 2,1997. MWR 9802113 has been written to close this TM. TM 97-012 is expected to be closed by January 1,1999.
At the end of May 1998, there was a total of fourteen (14) TMs instalied in the Fort Calhoun Station. Four (4) of the fourteen (14) installed TMs require an RFO for removal and ten (10) are removable on-line, in 1998, a total of f::urteen (14) TMs have been installed. At the end of May 1998, there were four (4) procedural or maintenance configuration alterations (PMCAs)(a special classification of TM) installed in the Fori Calhoun Station using PRC cpproved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order O-25.
Dita Source: Phelps/ Frank (Manager / Source)
Accountability- Phelps/ Core Trcnd: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 62&71 38
l l
i i Total Modification Packages Open j 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (68) 70 -
65 -
60 - 1' 55 . , , , , , , ,
l M ay June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec t
I OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of Outstanding Modifications (excluding _ outstanding modifications which are orocosed to be cancelled ).
Reporting Cateaorv '90 '94 E I Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress Mod. Requests Being Reviewe 0
0
_RE 0
0 0
0
'HI 0
0
'93 0
0 2
17 2
Month 2
17 Design Engr. Backlog /in Progress 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 l Construction Backlog /In Progress 1 0 4 5 18 0 28 Design Engr. Update Backlog /In Progress _E 4 _1 .2 __Q _Q __12 Totals 6 4 5 7 21 19 62 (Outage + OnLine) (2+4) (2+2) (5+0) (2+5) (17+4) (14+5)
The 1998 year-end Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 68 outstanding modifications.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Jaworski Trend: None 39
50 - EARS Requiring Engineering Clossout - Not in Closecut W SE N DEN 34 30 - 26 27 25 0 i i
i g ,
Mar Apr May Mar Apr M ay M ar Apr May Mar Apr M ay 0-3 M onths 3-6 Months 6-12 M onths >12 Months D Engineering Response E Closeout (SE) 20 -
g 20 ~~
10 10 10 -
3 4 3 3 1 1 1 3 1 I
0 0 0 ' . , I , ,
Priority 0 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 6 Priority 6 Clonout g 6 0 E A R 's 42 on O ve rdue 6
""5"2 4 e 2Y' " *[4 4 E" ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering and System Engineering. The 1998 year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum of 120 outstanding EARS.
Tha Total EAR breakdown is as follows:
EARS opened during the month 21 EARS closed during the month 13 Total EARS open at the end of the month 122 Data Soyrce: Jaworski/Uvingston (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 40
58 1%
358 c.3 CLOSEOUT U >6 Months 21 % Months 12% 16.4 %
35 7, s ([J.:.l 744 ECN STATUS-OVERALL BACKLOG 40 m Backlogged a Received a Completed g 150 - 102 h 8 100 92 86 99 100 40 % 34
_ 52 0 -
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May DESIGN ENGINEERING g Backlogged 3 Received 0 Completed 3 ;
5 90 --74 74 80 M Months o
. Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May SYSTEM ENGINEERING ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Trend: None SEP 62 41
3 Bddogged DW s Compissed 15 II 2!D 227 228 237 M M 242 34 0-3
- g. 210 Months
,9
>6 Months 6.2%
1fD 86.8 %
83 4 5 9 4 8 -
[bc Jri Feb Mr Apr May PROCUREMENT / CONSTRUCTION 16 5 m Bailogged D Raxmf D Campided 0-3 Months 3-6 Months 0 -
8
[hc Jan Feb Mar Apr May >6 Months 63.8 %
DRAFTING / CLOSEOUT ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Trend: None SEP62 42
93 100 83 108 DC TYPE FCTYPE Priority Priority 22.7 % 24.4 % 5&6 1&2 18 % 23 %
Pr or ty 3a4 Total Open ECNs = 470 59 %
T o t a l O p e n E C N s = 4 70 0 DEN-CbsecutorDrafbrgNotComplete D %%wh-WANotComplete 22 O S$emErghwag-Response,Cu4nsuuiNotComplete 11 Pra$1&2 D DEN-EngneenngNotComplete W E 0%
00 19 17 12 16 23 67 80 -
u m Pruq3&4 42 @,,Sce?$,. '
sg 41 39 32 p 67.0 %
20 45 42 38 41 43 44 0- -I i l I Che Jan Feb IWhr Apr May FadityChange EmsOpen ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 43
Substitute Replacement item ECNs Open noe ec 36 79 Total FC ECNs Open Prorty Priarty a ssa 1&2 249 13Yo
, 5 29 /o 185 187 198 37 210 215 50 - 27 27 28 28 27 3
0 E-Dec-97 Jan-98 Feb-98 Mar-98 Apr-98 May-98 Document Change ECNs Open o EN-CbesadorDnAngNcf Ccmine I y,
a symemEm-Resparse,ConfirmdicnNatCary*de M i 3 QN-ErgnsenngWCar;*de TcasDCsnopen 5 &6 7.5%
iiiiii i: iiii Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
@ 334 53.8 %
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 44
MAINTEN ANCE RULE UN AVAILABILITY PERFORM ANCE m sSSCs Exceeding Unavadabshty Ctriene C:=18 SSCs Monitored
--*--% Exceeding Unevenabdity Cntena 70-----------------~--------------------*--'-'----------~'------------- - - -- -
- 14 0 %
l 63
~
e0 - 12 0 %
50 - - 10 0%
g 2 n se "'
40 - ..
-80%
, r r-30 - .
60%
20 - 40%
' ^' '
,n . if ,
_,$ ,yng 0 OH 00%
3 96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 QTR Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Unavailability Performance value which is based on the performance of SSCs which have specific Availability Performance Criteria.
The percentage of SSCs which are exceeding their unavailability performance criteria is 3.2%.
This value has trended upward slightly during the first quarter of 1998 due to unavailability problems with Control Room Ventilation Fan, VA-46A.
Data Source Phelps/Sweamgin/ Johnson (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Phelps Trend: None 45
MAINTENANCE RULE SSC RELIABILITY PERFORMANCE sumus Total F ailures (C, D. F) Maintenance Preventable Failures + Percent Maintenance Preventable 140 70 0%
120
-- 60.0%
100 - 93 -- 50.0%
g 80 - - 40.0%
60 - -
52 - 30.0%
43 43 40 - 33 -- 20 0%
~
21 20 - ,
r is - 10 0%
0- A E+ "+ + -+- 2 +-
-00%
3-96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1 98 QTR Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Reliabilty Performance value which is based on tracking being compiled based on component failures since 10CFR50.65 was implemented in July of 1996. The percent of " Maintenance Preventable" failures is 37% at the end of the first quarter of 1998.
The Reliability indicator for the first quarter of 1998 shows that the percentage of failures identified as " Maintenance Preventable" is trending downward, as well as the total number of equipment failures.
Data Source Phelps/Sweamgin/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Phelps Trend: None 46
O Total Requalification Training Hours l 3 SimulatorTraining Hours l 3 Non-Requalification Training Hours a Number of Exam Fallures 40 -
35 - 33 33 M 30 -
25 -
20 -
18 15 - 4 14 2 12 2 10 10 - g 8
8 8 8 8 6
5-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-- i !
Cycle 971 Cycle 97-2 Cycle 97 3 Cycle 97-4 Cycle 97-5 Cycle 97-6 Cycle 97-7 Cycle 98-1 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each Cycle. The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification &
validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.
Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.
Note: Rotation 97-6 was the Annual Licensed Operator Requalification Examination rotation for 1997. There were Three (3) individual and one (1) crew simulator exam failures during rotation 97-6. All remediations were completed prior to the end of the exam week.
Data Source: Conner /Guliani(Manager / Source)
Accountability: Conner /Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 47
l 3 sRo Exams Administered E SRO Exams Passed O RO Exams Administered a RO Exams Passed 5 --
4 3 .
g..
1--
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 1998 This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. '5ese internally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.
During the month of May 1998, there were no (SRO) or (RO) training classes in session. The next license class is scheduled to begin in July,1998.
Data Source: Conner /Guliani(Manager / Source)
Accountability: Conner /Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 48
aRx:yrmas stMcscN alo WO M oIMFSrorETRUH:HD SG BA 1m f 7 ENS es g
Fun ,3 $ [
f&r4 Apr48 MyG8 MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE)
This indiutor shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in Cycle 18 RFO. This graph indicates:
Parts Holds - Planning Complete, Awaiting Parts System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering input to Planning Planner Holds - Maintenance Planner has not completed planning the work package.
ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacement items ECN from DEN.
in Review - Planning Complete awating SE, ISI and QC review.
Data Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase / Herman Trend: None SEP 31 49
ELAST OTHIS O FOR SCHEDULE 100 -- N E * - - -
gI E-90 - g E E E E 80 4-
- R 70 --
60 --
E 50 --
40 --
30 --
20 --
10 --
0 5 5 ! F ! ja I8 3F $
I l5 e1 5
=0 3 $
g3 1s El et E
i 3
jI j j "~
j$ 3 COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1998 0UTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT Data Source Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter Trend: None SEP 31 50
+ ActualFRCDste a Target FRCDate G/15/99 -
seco9 5e99 4/16 5)-
~
s a e a a e e a a a e a 3/7/99 -
2/15/99 ' ' ' ' ' '
a s e e -
e e e a s 8 a 2 2 3 4 9 2 2 2 2 2 8 m 2 m 8 8 m e a m e 2
e PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage (September 1999).
The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were identified prior to March 31,1998, PRC approved by March 18,1999.
May 1998 Modifications added: 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 51
l l
NO DATA AVAILABLE PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 0UTAGE MODS AND ECNS ADDED TO 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ECit approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their target date.
May 1998 Modifications /ECN6 Added = 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 33 52
10/28/d8 - m 9/28/98 -
8/29/98 -
7/30/98 -
6/30/98 -;e a 5/31/98 -
5/1/98 -
4/1/98 -
3/2/98 -
1/31/98 g - m
?$h eee PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.
The goal for this indicator is to have allinodification packages PRC approved by their scheduled date.
May 1998 Modifications Added: 0 Deleted: 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 53
ACTION PLANS SEP INDEX &
DISTRIBUTION LIST
i ACTION PLANS
) This section lists action plans that have been developed for the performance indicators J cited as Adverse Trends during the month preceding this report. Also included are Action Plans for indicators that have been cited in the preceding month's report as Needing Increased Management Attention for three (3) consecutive months.
In accordance with Revision 5 of NOD-OP-37, the following performance indicators would require action plans based on three (3) consecutive months of performance cited as "Needing increased Management Attention":
55
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX push-buttons) provided in the main control room.
This indicator index is calculated from a weighted combination of eleven performance indicator values, which include the following: Unit Capability Factor, 4) Critical means that during the steady-state Unplanned Capabikty Loss Factor, HPSI, AFW, condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the Emergency AC Power System, Unplanned Automatic effective multiplication (k ,, ) was essentially Scrams, Collective Radiation Exposure, Fuel Rehability, equal to one Thermal Performance, Secondary System Chemistry, and ( Page 12)
Industria! Safety Accident Rate.
( Page 6 ) HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFE 1Y SYSTEM PERFORMANCE UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR The sum of the known (planned and unplanned)
The ratio of the available energy generation over a given unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for time period to the reference energy generation (the the high pressure safety injection system for the reporting energy that could be produced if the unit were operated period divided by the entical hours for the reporting period continuously at fug power under reference ambient multiplied by the number of trains in the high pressure conditions) over the s;me time period, expressed as a safety injection system.
percentage. ( Page 10 ;
INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE -INPO UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator is defined as the number of accidents per The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given 200,000 man-hours worked for all utility personnel
} period of time, to the reference energy generation (the permanently assigned to the station that result in any of energy that could be produced if the unit were operated the following:
cor'.tinuously at fuD power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time penod, expressed as a 1) One or more days of restricted work (excluding percentage. ( Page 11 ) the day of the accident);
- 2) One or more days away from work (excluding UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER the d6y of the accident); and 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS 3) Fatahtes.
Contractor personnel are not included for this indicator.
This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned (Page 13) automate scrams (RPS logic actuations) that occur per 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of critical operation. AUXlLIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE The value for this indcator is esculated by multiplying the tctal number of unplanned automatic rea-tor scrams in a The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) specific time penod by 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />, then dividing that unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for number by the total number of hours entical in the same the auxiliary feedwater system for the reporting penod time period. The indicator is further defined as follows: divided by the critical hours for the reporting period multiplied by the number of trains in the auxiliary
anteipated part of a planned test.
EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY
- 2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the SYSTEM PERFORMANCE reactor by a rapid insertion of negative reactsvity (e g., by control rods, liquid injection system, The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) etc.) that is caused by actuation of the reactor unavailable and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the protecten system. The signal may have resutted emergency AC power system for the reporting period from exceeding a set point or spurious. divided by the number of hours in the reporting period
- 3) Automatic means that the initial signal that multip(ied by the number of trains in the emergency AC caused actuaton of the reactor protection power system.( Page 15) system logic was provided from one of the sensod monitoring plar.1 parameters and THERMAL PERFORMANCE conditions, rather than the manual scram switches or, manual turbine trip switches (or The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 16) 56
- - l
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX 1
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary Collective radiation exposure is the total extemal whole-coolant 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium body dose received by all on-site personnel (including contnbution and normalized to a common puri8ication contractors and visitors) dunng a time period, as rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD).
reactor core intemals from previous defective fuel or is Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of present on the surface of fuel elements from the person-rem. This indicator tracks radiological work manufacturing process. Steady state is defined as performance for SEP #54.
continuous operation for at least three days at a power ( Page 19 )
level that does not vary more than + or-5%. Planto should collect data for this indicator at a power level INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING cbove 85%, when possible. Plants that did not operate at INJURY /lLLNESS RATE steady-state power above 85% should collect data for this indicator at the highest steady-state power level attained The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in during the month. improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel permanently assigned to the station.
The density correctkn factor is the ratio of the specific Contractor work-hours are not included in this indicator.
volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature (540 Also, this indicator is defined as the number of accidents degrees F., Vf = 0.0217) divided by the specific volume of for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the coolant at normal letdown temperature (120 ' F at outlet station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-cf the letdown cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163), hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include which results in a density correction factor for FCS equal contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel to 1.33. ( Page 17 ) performance for SEP #25, 26 & 27.(Page 20 )
SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE INDEX WASTE The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI)is a calculation This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid based on the concentration of key impurities in the radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the indicator also shows the velume of low-level radioactive most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators, waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of Criteria for calculating the CPI are: radioactive oil that has been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste
- 1) The plant is at greater than 30 percent power; and which has been shipped off-site for processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste,
- 2) the power is changing less than 5% per day, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance.
The CPI is calculated using the following equation: Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic CPI = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chloride /1.52) +(Sulfate /1.44) + containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a (Iron /3.30) + (Copper /D.30)+(Condensate 02/2.90))/6 low-level radioactive waste drsposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all Where: Sodium, sulfate, chloride and condensate radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of Casolved spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54. ( Page 21 )
oxygen are the monthly average blowdown concentrations in ppb, iron and copper are monthly time RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES weighted average feedwater concentrations in ppb. The FREQUENCY RATE denominator for esof the five factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly average for a specific parameter is The number of injuries requiring more than normal first less than the INPO median value, the median value is aid per 200,000 man-hours worked. This indicator trends used in the calculation. personnel performance for SEP #15,25 and 26.
( Page 18) ( Page 23 ) l l
CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS t 1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA 57 i
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX The personnel contamination events in the clean maintenance functional organization.
controlled area This indicator tracks personnel Activities included in this category are performance for SEP #15 & 54. ( Page 24 ) maintenance, testing. surveillance, calibration and radiation protection.
PREVENTABLEtPERSONNEL ERROR LERs
- 5) Design / Construction / Installation / Fabric This indicator is a breakdown of LERs. For purposes of LER ation Problem - This cause code covers a event classification a
- Preventable LER*is defined as' full range of programmatic deficiencies in I
the areas of design, construction, An event for whch the root cause is personnel error (i e., installation, and fabrication (i.e., loss of inappropriate acbon by one or more individua!s). inadequate control power due to underrated fuse, administrative cotees. a desgn construction, installation, equipment not qualifed for the installaten, fabncation problem (involvng work completed by or environment, etc.).
supervised by OPPD personnel) or a maintenance problem (attributed to inadequale or improper wkeep/ repair of plant 6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece-equpment). Also, the cause of the event must have occurred Parts or Environmental-Related within approximately two part of the " Event Date" specified in Failures) - This code is used for spurious the LER (e g., an event for which the cause es attnbuted to a failures of electronic piece-parts and failures probiern wth the original desgn of the plant would not be due to meteorological conditions such as considered preventable). lightning, ice, high winds, etc. Generally, it includes spurious or one-trme failures.
For purposes of LER event classtncaten, a " Personnel Error" Electric components included in this LER is defined as follows- category are circuit cards, rectrfers, bistables, fuses, capacitors, diodes, An event for which the root cause is inappropnate acten on the resistors, etc.
part of one or more individuals (as opposed to being attrbuted in addition this indicator reports SEP # 6 &
to a department or a general group). Aiso, the inappropnate 61. (Page 26) acten must have occurred within approximately two pars of the " Event Date" specified in the LER. Additionally, each VIOLATION TREND this indicator is defined as Fort event classified as a " Personnel Error" should also be Calhoun Station Cited Violations and Non-Cited classified as " Preventable." This indicator trends Violations trended over 12 months. Additionally, personnel performance for SEP ltem #15. ( Page 25 ) CitedViolations for the top quartile Region IV plant istrended over 12 months (lagging the Fort LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE CalhounStation trend by 2-3 months). It is the BREAKDOWN FortCalhoun Station goalto be at or below the cited violation trend for thetopquartileRegion IV plant.
This indicator shows the number and root cause code for ( Page 27 )
Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as follows: CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR
- 1) Administrative Control Problem - The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical Management and supervisory deficiencies operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per kilowatt that affect plant programs or activities (i tr., hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per poor planning, breakdown or lack of kilowatt hour on a twelve-month average for the current adequate management or supervisory year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved control, incorrect procedures, etc). yearly budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report.
- 2) Licensed Operator Errcir - This cause ( Page 29 )
code captures errors of omission / commission by licensed reactor operators during plant a:tivities.
- 3) Other Personnel Errr,r Errors of omission /commissior, committed by non-heensed personnelinvolved in plant activites. l
- 4) Maintenance Problem The intent of this cause code is to capture the full range of problems which can be attributed in any way to programmatic deficiencies in the 58
i l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOGS PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS l (MAINTENANCE) l This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage M:intenance Work Documents remaining open at the The number of identified incidents conceming cnd of the reporting month. Maintenance clas-aitications maintenance procedural problems, the number of closed cre defined as follows: irs related to the use of procedures (includes the number of closed irs caused by procedural noncompliance), and Corrective Repair and restoration of equipment or the number of closed procedural noncompliance irs.
l components that have failed or are malfunctioning and This indcator trends personnel performance for SEP l are not performing their intended function. #15,41 and 44. ( Page 33)
Preventive - Actions taken to maintain a piece of CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA equipment within design operating conditions, prevent equipment failure, and extend its life and are performed The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which l
prior to equipment failure. includes the auxilary building, the radwaste building, and l areas of the C/RP building, that is contaminated based on l Non-Corrective / Plant improvements - Maintenance the total square footage. This indicator tracks activities performed to implement station improvements performance for SEP #54. ( Page 34) or to repair non-plant equipment.
RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM l Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as:
The number of identified poor radiological work practices Emergency - Conditons which significantly degrade (PRWPs) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks station safety or availability. radiological work performance for SEP #52. ( Page 36) j l
Immediate Action Equipment deficiencies which DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) l significantly degrade station relability. Potental for unit
{
j shutdown or power reduction. The Document Review indicator shows the number of j l documents reviewed, the number of documents 1 l Operations Concern Equipment deficiencies which scheduled for review, and the number of document I hinder station operation. reviews that are overdue for the reporting month. A document review is considered overdue if the review is l Essential Routine corrective maintenance on not complete within six
! essential staton systems and equipment. months of the assigned due date. This indicator tracks l performance for SEP #46. ( Page 36 )
l Non-Essential - Routine corrective maintenance on j non-essential station systems and equipment. SECURITY INCIDENTS Plantimprovement Non-corrective maintenance and The total number of secunty incidents for the reporting j plant improvements. month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks security performance for SEP #58. ( Page 37) l This indicator tracks maintenance performance for
! SEP #36. ( Page 31 ) TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The number of temporary mechanical and electrical
& PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE configurations to the plant's systems.
I l The rato of preventive maintenance (including 1) Temporary configurations are defined as l surveillance testing and calibraton procedures) to the electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, l sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks
! preventive maintenance completed over the reporting which are installed in the plant operating perod. The rato, expressed as a percentage, is systems and are not shown on the latest calculated based on man-hours. Also displayed are the revision of the P&lD, schematic, percent of preventive maintenance items in the month connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.
that were not completed or administrative!y closed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25% of the 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive Surveillance Tests, Maintenance m:intenance activities for SEP #41 ( Page 32 ) Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures or Operating 59
l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX l UCENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS )
l Procedures are not considered as This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO l temporary modifications unless the jumper quizzes and exams that are administered and passed or block remains in place after the test or each month. This indicator tracks training performance procedure is complete. Jumpers and for SEP #68.
blocks installed in test or lab instruments ( Page 48 )
are not considered as temporary modifications. MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 19 REFUEUNG OUTAGE)
- 3) Scaffold is not considered a temporary modification. Jumpers and blocks which This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance are installed and for which Mrs have been Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work submitted will be considered as temporary Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for modifications until final resolution of the MR inclusion in the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage. This indicator l and the jumper or block is removed or is tracks performance #31 permanently recorded on the drawings. ( Page 49)
This indicator tracks temporary modifications SEP #62 and 71. SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING AND
( Page 38) COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT,1998 j OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT ENGlhEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR)
BREAKDOWN This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31, ;
( Page 48)
This indicator shows a breakdown, by age and prionty of the EAR, of the number of EARS assigned to Design PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUEUNG OUTAGE Engineering Nuclear and System Engineering. This MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. ( Page 40 )
This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS for installation during the Cycie ig Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31. ( Page 51 )
The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks ECNS ADDED TO 99 REFUEUNG OUTAGE AFTER performance for SEP #62. FREEZE DATE i
( Page 41&42 )
This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN ECfe approved for installation during the Cycle 1 g Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for This indicator breaks down the number of Engineenng SEP #33. ( Page 52 )
Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineenng. and Progress of 1998 On-Une modification Planning Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facirsty Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement items This indicator shows the status of modifications approved open, and EUN Document Changes open. This indicator or in review for approval for on-line insta!!ation during tracks performance for SEP #62. 1998. This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.
( Page 43 &44) ( Page 53 )
UCENSED OPERATOR REOUAUFICATION TRAINING The total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. Wso provided are the simulator
. training hours (which are a subset of the total training l hours), the number of non-REOUALIFICATION training hours and the number of exam failures. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP # 68. ( Page 47) f l 60 t
I
I SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators index is to list performance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.
SEP Reference Number 15 Eaan
. Increase HPES and IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . . . 33 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . . .. . . . 23 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations 31,000 Disintegrations / Minute Per Probe Area 24 Preventable /PersonnelError LERs .
25 SEP Reference Numbers 25. 26. & 27
. Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented
. Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements a
implement Supervisory Enforcernent of Industrial Safety Standards Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate .. . . .. . . 20 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . .
. 23 SEP Reference Number 31 I
. Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 19 Refueling Outage) . . . ... 49 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects . 50 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . 51 Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . . 53 SEP Reference Number 33
. Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECNs Added to09 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date . . 52 SEP Reference Number 36
- Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) . .. . 31 SEP Reference Numbers 41 & 44
- Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule a Compliance With and Use of Procedures Ratio of Preventive to Tota' Maintenance & Preventive Maintenance items Overdue .. 32 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) 33 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review .. . . 36 I
61
i SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX l
- SEP Reference Number 52 gagg
. Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological! Work Practices Program . . . . . . .. .. .... . . . . . 35 l l l SEP Reference Number 54 I e Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure .. ... . . ...... . .. ..... . ..... .. ... ... ig Volume of Low-Level So!id Radioactive Waste . . . .... . . . . . 21 Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations >1,000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area .. . .. . 24 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area .. ... . . . .... . . ... ... 34 SEP Reference Number b8 e Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program
! Security lncidents ..... . ... . . .. . . .. . . .. . ..... . . . ... . 37 I SEP Reference Numbers 60 & 61 e improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program e Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests resulting in Licensee Event Reports . .. . 26 SEP Reference Number 62 e Establish Interim System Engineers l
l Temporary Modifications . . ... . ... .... ... . . .. . .. . .. .. . 38 i l
Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . . . . . .. .. . . 26 l Engineering Change Notice Status .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . 41&42 Engineering Change Notices Open ... , .... .. . . . 43 &44 l SEP Reference Number 68 l . Assess Root Cause of Poor Oparator Training and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requahfication Training . .. . .. . . .. . 47 License Candidate Exams ... .. . .. . ... .. 48
! SEP Reference Number 71 e improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary; modifications .. . . .. .. . . . . 38 62
1 Fort Calhoun Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates 1 l EVENT l DATE RANGE l PRODUCTION (MWH) l CUMULATIVE (MWH) !
Cyde 6 06/11/80-09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Cyde 7 12/21/81 12/03/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Cyde 8 04/06/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 )
l Cyde9 07/12/84-09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Cyde 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Cyde 11 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936.859 41,771,505 Cyde 12 01/31/89-02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 Cyde 13 05/29/90-02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 Cycle 14 05/03/92-09/25/93 4,981,485 56,022.013 Cycle 15 11/26/93-02/20/95 5,043,887 61,065,900 Cyde 16 04/14/95-10/05/96 5,566,108 66.632,007 Cyde 17 11/25/99-04/01/98 5.183,684 71,815,678
)
CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" l i
First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47p.m.)
First Electricty Suppled to the System August 25,1973 i Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 Days) June 8,1987-September 27,1988 Highest Monthy Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 j Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH-Cyde 13) May 29,1990-February 1,1992 l Shortest Refueling Outa9e (52 days) February 20,1995-April 14,1995 l
63
REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST D. J. Bannister J. K. Kellams K. L. Belek R. L. Jaworski G. C. Bishop J. W. Johnson C. E. Boughter D .D. Kloock C. J. Brunnert J. B. Kuhr (11 Copies)
C. A. Cadson I . T. Kusek J. W. Chase S. A. Lindquist R.G. Conner B. R. Livingston J. E. Cook T. J. Mcivor J.R. Goodell K. A. Miller !
M.R. Core R. J. Mueller '
Pat Cronin R. L. Phelps T. R. Dukarski R. L. Plott M. L. Ellis W.J.Ponec R. P. Clemens R. T. Ridenoure S. K. Gambhir D. G. Ried J.' K. Gasper M. J. Sandhoefner W.G. Gates F. C. Scofield S. W. Gebers H. J. Sefick M. J. Guinn R. W Short R. H. Guy R. D. Spies (2 Copies)
A. L. Hale K. E. Steele B. R. Hansher D. E. Spires R. K. Hamilton M. A. Tesar K. R. Henry J. J. Tesarek J. B. Herman J. W. Tills R. P. Hodgson D. R. Trausch C. K. Huang L. P. Walling G. R. Williams 64
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .