ML20196E498

Performance Indicators Rept for Oct 1998

ML20196E498
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	10/31/1998
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20196E494	List: LIC-98-0161, Forwards Fort Calhoun Station Oct 1998 Performance Indicators Rept ML20196E498
References
NUDOCS 9812040028
Download: ML20196E498 (65)

Text

.-.

[ OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT g FORT CALHOUN STATION

{

(

s. L  ?

s' s ',

' q O A m .a ygy  ;$4 ny gi;b - < ;g e "

,y,473Px t% c.

. , rr

lfi .. A .;

I.

f :f k] .

(( pf_llhkhQ b % 1 .. ^'

g __

b N

)G + %cf W R,.n'5-'53  ;

rpyly[$ .'W' n.mm e ,,,

.c;N

. .m ., sA2 4 f q?;L gl.9)?: l$

piq- { '35

%, n 9 '

t

% 'i Y,r ~

.A 's N ~

^

• <w I'$

' 3, Q f, f

~

d,llYh{kklQ" s

dgns scA' 'ff 0.-

e u.

4 L

m r-n j

)

su .y

a. - ~ --

MurM&m  %= e- 4

/ NMd@MY. Sph -

'; UI '

x m m gMy;m xwp w'%;.ggnelg,pey+apa qc w' 4,7M u m~ m.pq m ww.3p*. wp.-u 3, ep#p..w:.e ey. , .plf

+ g y'

'i 1 Q  %

Ve3-f:

g;;dd e Af W y W;;Jnaya

"'S,  % /Oj

,a

_ wn%. a.s > , n; < 4,g ; y^~@3;; u ~ p %m3;w , C 6 5 ., ag u i<

ga m n : fit;5l.';c?

1 m g gg g

• yyeWwWMgg;hgy;;3>7 - '

e-ou g"lgi,y^  ! e.7 i -&n% O;;p, , s , -

i i W:. z; z , ' u4; , , . i c l, >

. , ,q

,;,2$bbE $1C Oiddd 1 1 46 be 2lM dS S d N k$AC2 2 E 3 h i lid. A s, M .;e a d e d n .M 5 3 N h l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

( OCTOBER 1998 SAFE OPERATIONS

, PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE COST EFFECTIVENESS 9012040028 981123 5 PDR ADOCK 0500 R

Table of Contents / Summary eene TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

. 1 MONTHLY

SUMMARY

REPORT . . . .4 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND 5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR ,. . .6 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT

SUMMARY

7 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENIS . . 8 WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Unit Capability Factor . .. .10 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor . . 11 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS per 7000 Hours . . 12 High Pressure Safety injection System . 13 Auxiliary Feedwater System .14 Emergency AC Power System .

.15 Thermal Performance . . . . . .. .16 Fuel Reliabikty Indicator. . . . . 17 Secondary System Chemistry . . .18 Collective Radiation Exposure . . . . .19 industrial Safety Accident and Disabkng injury / illness Rate 20 Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste . . 21 SAFE OPERATIONS Personnel Error Rate . . .23 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations 11,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area . 25 1

l Table of Contents / Summary Preventable / Personnel Error LERs .26 Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown . 27 Violation Trend . . . .28 mm Cents Per Kilowatt Hour . . . 30 DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Maintenance Workload Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) . 32 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . 33 Procedural Noncompliance incidents . . . 34 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area , . 35 Radiological Werk Practices Program . 36 Document Review . .37 Security incidents . 38 Temporary Modifications . .39 Outstanding Modifications . . . .40 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . 41 Engineering Change Notices Status . .42 Open .43 Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . 44 Licensed Operator Requahfication Training .45 License Candidate Exams .46 Cycle 19 Refueling Outage MWD Planning Status .47 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage . 48 ll l

5 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modrfications Cycle 19 .

Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to 1999 RFO After Freeze

. 49 50 l 7 I

o r

Table of Contents / Summary

! Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning , ,. .. . . .. . . . 51 I

ACTION PLANS. DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX <

Action Plans . .... . . ... ... . 53 Performance Indicator Definitions . . . . . . 56 Safety Enhancement Program Index .. .... . .. .. .. . . . . 61 Current Production and Operations " Records"/ Station Operating Cycles and RFO Dates . .. . 63 Monthly Performance Indicator Sources . . . 64 4

3 1-

FORT CALHOUN STATION l Monthly Summary OPERATIONS During the month of October 1998, the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) operated at a nominal 100% power.

Temporary Modification (TM) number DCP 0010039/DCN 0010029 was PRC approved on October 21,1998.

This TM wolded a pipe sleeve with closure cap and vent valve (normally closed) to the exterior of Main Feedwater check Valve FW-161 to contain extemal leakatle flw of feedwater from the valve body.

WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The overall WANO Perforrnance Index was 84.4% during the 3rd Quarter of 1998. Significant percentage point losses are attributed to the WANO Performance Indicators listed below:

1. The Unit Capability Factorindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 3.7 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on page 10.

2. The Unplanned Capability Loss FactorIndicator calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 6.6 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on pages 10 and 11.

3. The ThermalPerformance Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.3 point loss due to thermal energy losses experience during reactor power changes and forced outages defined on pages 10 and 16.

4. The Collective Radiation Exposure Indicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 3.1 point loss, which was attributed to fuel failures and recent high exposure jobs during the refueling outage on page 19.

5. The Emergency AC Powerindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contnbuted to a 1.2 point loss, which was a result of on-line maintenance, and replacement of relays under ECN95-347,

" Replace Relays for Seismic Adequacy" on page 15.

6. The Chemistry Performance index indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.4 point loss, which is due to copper tubes in heat exchangers and mechanical shock to systems in the past year from forced outages defined on page 10.

7. The Industrial Safety Accident Rate Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.2 point loss, which is due to a loss time accident.

4 I

l

-e-index Median -<>-Index Sc;st Quartile -*-Index Worst Quartile -+-Fort Calhoun 100 - - 100 95 - - 95 90 -

1- 85 -

- e r =

90 85 80 --* -

-- 80 75 -

g A - 75 70 - -- 70 65 + M -

65 so _ - 1 1 . .

eo I

k$$ 00 888h$$fh888888888888888$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$

I WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND I

Fort Calhoun indexCalculation . Third Quarter 1998 -

l OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Unit Capability Factor (2yr)

' WElGHT VALUE PRODUCT 0.1s 78.3 12.3 g Unpl. Cap. Loss Factor (2yr) 0.12 8.3 5.4 Unplanned Auto Scrams (2yr) 0.08 0.0 8.0 Safety System Performance:

l PWR High Press. Inj. (2yr) 0.10 0.000 10.0 PWR Aux. Feedwater (2yr) 0.10 0.003 10.0 Emergency AC Power (2yr) 0.10 0.015 l Thermal Performance (1yr) 0.06 99.9 8.8 5.7 Fuel Rel. (Most recent qtr) 0.08 1.oE.06 8.0 l Chemistry Perf. Ind. (1yr) 0.07 1.15 s.s Collective Rad. Exposure (2yr) 0.08 217 4.9 Ind. Safety Acc. Rate (1yr) 0.05 0.37 4.8 NORM.I 84.4

{

[

5

_m._ _ _ _ _ _ _

18 00 + 8 l

16.00 5 M A X IM U M V A L U E E Second Otr '98 EThird Otr '98 l 14.00 d 88 Cf "a l

12.00 - 888 888 8 0 000 000 Oq 10 00 - " a_ =o 8 888 888 8.00 -

o Uk ss E 800 6.00 - A 8

• Oba e < .

cm, ,

4.00 - .

2.00 0.00 + -F + + + + - + + + + w UCF UCLF HPSI AFW E/CP CRE UA7 FRl CPI TPI ISAR WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS This graph shows the dfference between Second Qtr '98 and Third Qtr '98 actual values achieved by Fort Calhoun.

CALCULATED OVER A 24 MONTH PERIOD MAXIMUM / ACTUAL VALUES TREND UCF Unit Capability Factor 16/12.30 Positive UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12/ 5.40 Neutral HPSI High Pressure Safety injection 10/10.00 Positive AFW Auxiliary Feedwater 10/10.00 Positive EACP Emergency AC Power 10/ 8.80 Negative UA7 Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hours 8/ 8.00 Positive CRE Collective Radiation Exposure 8/ 4.90 Neutral CALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD TPI Thermal Performance indicator 6/ 5.70 Neutral CPI Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7/ 6.60 Negative ISAR Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5/ 4.80 Negative CALCULATED OVER A QUARTERLY PERIOD FRI Fuel Rehability indicator 8 / 8.00 Positive

(

6

i i

I PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SUMMARY

REPORT I

i ADVERSE TREND REPORT POSITIVE TREND REPORT I A performance indicator with data representing three consecutive months of improving performance or three consecutive months of corformance that is supenor to the stated goal is exhibiting a positive A performance indicator with data representing three consecutive months of declining performance or three consecut!ve months of performance that is trending toward declining as determined by the Manager - Nuclear Licensing, constitutes an trend per Nuclear Operdions Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD- adverse trend per Nuclear Operations Division Quality Procedure 37 QP-37). The following perform 0nce indicators exhibited positive (NOD-QP-37) A supervisor whose performance indicator exhtbits an trends for the reporting month. adverse trend by this definition may specify in written form (to be published in this report) why the trend is not adverse The following Unolanned Automatic Reactor Serams (Page 12) performance indicators exhibited adverse trends for the reporting I

month. '

(Hiah Pressure Safety Iniection System Safety System Performance Page 13) Temocrary Modifications (Page 39)

Aux. Feed Water System Safety System Performance (Page 14)

INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT Yhermal Performance (Page 16) ATTENTION REPORT Document Review (Page 37) A performance indicator with data for the reporting penod that is

,I Ucense Candidate Exams-1998 (Page 46) inadequate when compared to the OPPD goalis defined as *Needing Increased Management Attention

• per(NOD-QP-37)

Collective Radiation ExDosure (Page 19)

Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (Page 25)

Cents Per Kilowatt Hour (Page 30)

Radioloaical Work Practices Procram (Page 36) l l

l I

lI I

I

___m ___ __ .__ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . . . . _ . - . . _ _ ___ ._ _ .. __

um S ig nific a nt O N otew o rth y ,

16 - 14 14 - -

12 -

10 8- 7 5

7 [ -

7

! 3 1

2 2- 0 0

! O- -

nimm _ _,_ _

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 J

INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS i

Noteworthy /Significant events at FCS are classified by INPO to identify precursors to events. There was 0 Significant and 1 Noteworthy Event during the month of October 1998.

Significant Events for October 1998:

. none Noteworthy Events since start of INPO Cycle:

Transformer Fault and Loss of Off-Site Power While Shutdown Due to inadvertent Actuation of Transformer Deluge System.

. Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Overspeed and Overpressurization of System Piping.

e Reactor Coolant Pump Cavitation During Planned Pressure Reduction.

j Noteworthy Historical Events since start of INPO Cvele:

. . inappropriate Emergency Diesel Generator Operability Criteria

. Waste Disposal System Valves susceptable to over pressurization during post accident samp ing .

due to potential valve failure not considered during System Design.

. Containment Hydrogen Panel Components Exceed Qualified Life Due to incorrect Calculation Assumptions.

. Degraded Steam Generator Tube Left in Service Due to Personnel Error.

Data Source: Frans/Guinn (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Frans/Guinn Trend: None 8

li_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

a 1

i i

WANO in PERFORM.A_NCE l, INDICATORS li i

i i

i f

i l

l a

I i

I i

i

I C Monthly Unit Capability Factor -- -- 24 Month Unit Capability Factor I

I 120 0% g

• 8 8 8 8 8 g

= 8 8 8 8 8 $ $s fg N " "

.8 " " "

8 8 8 8 $

_ ", "m---m -e 100 0% , ,

)

f j

800% , 8 R, m N ,

_ a _m._m -

g m _ m_ m _. m _a_m._m a.-m 60 0% $ i Q

40 0% -

1998 RFO 20 0%

o 00%J __. ,-._ _ - . . . . _ , _ , _ _ . _ . , , _ , . , _ , _ _ , _ _ . _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ .

4492e EEN: ee EkEje e <= e e ? 8 4 4 4 $ $ $ 8 $

k 1$e EEk$E& Ek4 %a8 8

I UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy j gen: ration over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. The FCS Goal for the indicator is (87.5%) and the WANO Median is (81.9%).

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR AVERAGES l

Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month l

77.7 % 81.5 % 82% 83.3% l Enerov Lossgni Forced Outage-Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Ev:nt Period: September 10, thru 13,1997.

Power Reduction- Faulty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Ev:nt Period: August 26,28,1997.

Forced Outage- Circumferential cracking of a weld down stream of a moisture separator due to high system stresses Ev:nt Penod: May 28, thru May 29,1997.

l Forced Outage- Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system Evint Penod: April through mid May 1997.

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCF indicator was 12.30 points out of 16 points. At the end of the I Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 12.30 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 10.60.

1 Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Solymossy Tr:nd: None 10

r~

c :=3 Monthly unpbnned Capibility Loss Fccior --o-. 24-Month Rolling Averrgs Fort Cclhoun Go:t (3.5%) --*-- W A No Industry Msdi:n (2.2%)

2 60.00 % - g

~

50.00% b p

4000% h h a a g 30.00% - - -

g 1998 RFO 10 00% _

blblM

,__, b b

d - - - --

k Ad _

$$$b$

0.0 0 %

T

. , a ,_-

?

.....M

-+- ---

n- ___ ,

8 8 j2 4442 2 42 442 8 j 8 8 8 8 94 8 8

$babEE$kb$$8Eba2 EE$kA $$8 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median. UCLF is defined as the r;tio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not produced as a result of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to causes under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they cre not scheduled at least four weeks in advance.

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 4.6% 3.8% 8.3% 7.2%

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCLF indicator was 5.40 points out of 12 points. At the end of the l Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.40 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 5.50.

I .

D:ta Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None E 11

4

--e- 12-Month Rolling Aver:ge

+ FCS Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critical for last 36 months Fort Calhoun Goal (0.0)

--aH. WANO Industry Median (0)

--*- ICS Reactor Scrams - 1997-98 2-1998 RFO e  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :

0:  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :

o 8 ,E S  % E @ E $ E E y z o a m < a < e 4 ,

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL The graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD goal for 1998 cod the WANO Industry Median. Also the graph shows the number of Unplanned Automatic R: actor Scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. There were no Unplanned Automatic R: actor's during the month of October 1998.

6 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HOURS CRITICALC ,

Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0% 0% 0% 0%

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UA7 indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of th) Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which ccmpares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 8.0.

D:ta Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: Positive 12

l Monthly M61 System Unavallability Value

-a- 12 Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (0.003)

--e-- WANOIndustryMedian (0.002) 0.02 -

0.015 -

0.01 --

0.005 -

0--: ,

1 ': s  : ': ':  : , , sa  ;

o $  % E & E b E S U z o ,E a z < z z y < m o HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for October 1998. The HPSI System unavailability value for the month of October 1998 was 0.0. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned unavailability, end 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability, t

888N 84EASURE SAFEN NLAiNmON' SYSTEM SAFETY . SYSTEM PERFORAWUdCE Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0% 0% 0% 0%

A 24 month calculation of the WANO HPSI indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 10.0 Data Source: Skiles/Schaffer(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Schaffer Trend: Positive 13

~'

->12 Month AFW Un3vallability I Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01)

---

WANO Industry Median (0.001)

]

0.015 -

0.013 0.011  !

0.009 -

1 0.007 - 0.006 l 0.005 0.005 - a 0.002 M M8No 0.003 j s _

0.001 ,.--7-- - - g - - - g- - -

m , v O'- - - ~ 'O' - - - 'U~ ~ - - { ~ ~ T - - -0 i l

4 001 - Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct I_

l AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMS SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE l

This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined by i WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of October 1998.

I The AFW System Unavailability Value for October 1998 was 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />. There were 0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month.

/ AUXIUARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMS SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0.001 % 0.001 % 0.002 % 0.002 %

A 24 month calculation of the WANO AFW indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 10.0.

Data Source: Skiles/Fritts (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Fritts Trend: Positive 14

Monthly Em ergency AC Power Unavailability Value

-as- Year-to-Date Em ergency AC Power Unavailability Value Fort Calhoun Goal (0.024)

---*-- WAN O Ind us try Media n(0.00 5) 0.07 - g 0.06 - 6 to 0.05 - 3 6

0 5 h L 0.02 \ =

0 01 ~ dm E

R i4 E

~ ~

M

. E E

~, ^

0 -

- .M M -- E 8 E ,E S E

$ ,5 3 F & D E 8 e e a s s# '

< m o z o L

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of October 1998.The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for October 1998 was 0.011.

MONTHLY UNAVAILABILITY Planned Unavailability DG-1: 13.6 DG 2: 3.0 Total:16.6 YTD: 203.85 Hours Unplanned Unavai!abihty DG-1: 0.0 DG-2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTD: 00.00 Hours EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0.018 % 0.01 6 % 0.015 % 0.015 %

A 24 month calculation of the WANO EACP indicator was 8.80 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.80 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 9.40.

Data Source: Skiles/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Ronning Trend: Needing increased Management Attention 15

m MonthlyThermalPerformance i i 1 12-Month Rolling Average i Fort Calhoun Goal (99.7%)

-*- W ANO Industry Media n (99.1 %)

f # # f # 1998 8 8 8 #

100%

8 e  !

e a

8  !

e _

Rm

!  !  ! 8 5 99% I I 9 9.,. 1> _

o e o - - >, . >, en - - -

E 8 8 E $ $ $ $ h A $ o I l THERMAL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the monthly Thermal Performance Value, the rolling 12-month average, the I OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median. The thermal performance value for the month of October was 99.87%.

The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is an index value which is > 99.7%. The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPlindicator 99.9%.

I I

THERMAL PERFORMANCE Year-to-date 12 month 24 month l 36 month 100 99.9 99.9 99.9 I

The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPlindicator was 5.7 points out of 6 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.7 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 5.7.

l Data Source: Skiles/Naser(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Naser Trend: Positive L 16 r

m Fusi Reliability (E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

A End of1998 Goal (17.3 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

--e-- WANO Industry Median (0.21 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram) g 100 -

$ 10 - 4.7 A

E 1.8 m

g 1-

$ 0.1

$ 0.01 0.01 0.01 m 0.01 -- , , ,- , 1 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR l The monthly Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) for October 1998 of 4.70 E-04 microcuries/ gram was based on steady state data at 100% power. The purpose of the FRI is to monitor industry progress in achieving and maintaining a high level of fuel integrity. An effective fuel integrity and performance l monitoring program provides a means to detect fuel failures and assess the fuel failure number, physical condition, exposure, mechanism, and location.

l Coolant activity data through October 31,1998 does show the presence of one defective fuel rods.

lodine activity levels are higher than expected for a clean core. This is due to operating with fuel failures for the past 2.5 cycles which contributed to the large amount of tramp (lodine-134) and I lodine-131 currently present in Cycle 18. The current lodine-134 activity indicates that 70 percent of the tramp material in the active core region was removed during the spring 1998 refueling outage.

Xenon-133 increased at the end of September and during October.

The Quarterly calculation of the WANO FRI indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value I of 0.0.

I Data Source: Guinn/Roenigk (Manager / Source)

I Accountability: Solymossy/Stafford Trend: None l

l l

L 17 E

MonthlyChemistryIrx5cator f

1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (1.1)

-s-WMOlndustry Median (1.04) 1.6 1.4 1 1 29

1.2 1.1 1. 1.1 1 11 1.04 1.12 1.1 l 1

0.8 ,

0.6 0.4 +

0.2 _ 1998 0 RFO O O -+ + + -+ 4 +

e -- + + + -1 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY Steady state plant conditons required for calculating the Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) for plant performance following Refueling Outage that ended on June 4.

The CPI for October 1998 is 1.10, which is lower then September. Chemical impurity limits for treatment chemicals is being reduced to further lower impurity ingress. Reference memo FC-C-091-98, see action I plan. The CPI value in the industry's upper quartile is 1.17. Six parameters are used in the CPI calculation.

Four of the parameters were below the WANO mean value which are as follows: 1) steam generator chloride,2) sulfate,3) feedwater iron, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.

I SECONDARY SYS[EM CHEMISTRY Year-to-date 12 month 24 month 36 month 1.17 1.15 1.33 1.26 The 12 month calculation of the WANO CPI Indicator was 6.60 points out of 7 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 6.60 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 7.00 Data Source: Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Hamilton Trend: None F

18

i M o n t h ly R a d ia t io n Dose (S R D)

--+-- A c c u m u l a t e d Dose based on SRD reading 250000 --

g .

200000 - &

5 3; 150000 --

100000 k e

50000 - 8 E h - s -

X

• V  ! R E 8 @

0 -N + " H- + O+1+1+-'  :

4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE The 1998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhoun Station was established for c Total Dose of 224.0 person-Rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are obtained. The exposure for October 1998 was 2.66 person-Rem (ED). The WANO Industry Medien is 127 person-REM per year based on a three year average compared to 139 person-REM per year at FCS.

ATLD COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE FOR 1998E DOSE FCS GOAL PERSON- FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH REM QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER TOTAL 224.0 15.560 193.163 8.516 person-Rem The 24 month calculation of the WANO CRE Indicator was 4.9 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 4.9 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 4.6.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 54 19

m Y-T-Dindustrial Safety Accident & Disabling injury / Illness Rate

-e- 12 Month Rolling Average f FCS Year-End Goal (<0.40)

-e- Year 2000 WANo industry Goal (<0.40) 1-0.9 -

0.8 ,

0.7 y 0.4 is -

3 5  : 5 S 5 5 0.3 0 AS , .

r-Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct f

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND

[ DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for

[ utility personnel permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in the I indicator.

ISAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fatalities) x 200.000 (number of station person-hours worked)

The Fort Calhoun Station Industrial Safety Accident Rate and Disabling Injury / Illness f Frequency Rate was 0.37 for the month of October 1998. There was no restricted-time and cne lost-time accident in October 1998 a security officer slipped on loose gravel and twisted his knee.

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT & DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS Year to-date 12 month 24 month 36 month 0.37 0.31 0.11 0.16 Th312 month calculation of the WANO ISAR Indicator is 4.8 points out of 5 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 4.8 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 v lue of 5.0.

Data Source: Sorensen/Gunn (Manager / Source)

Solymossy/ Booth (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Short Trend: None SEP 25,26 & 27 20 l

Monthly Volume of LLRW (cu. meter)

[ Year-to-Date Cumulative Radioactie Waste Buried

--m-WANO Industry Median (54 cu. meter)

Fort Cahoun Goal (23 cu. meter )

60.00 -

= = = = = = = = = =

50.00 -

li; j 40.00 -

.s j 30.00 - S 8 o e e f 20.00 -

o , S 10.00 - gg 8 e n n g0 0

• g u, 8 f sd 8* 0

• 0.00 E, S, 8 *E,3*oE ,8*% ~ ,8o , ,_ ,. , ,

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

{

VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE f This indicator shows the volume of the monthly Radioactive Waste buried and the cumulative y:ar-to-date radioactive wasts buried. The Fort Calhoun goal is 23 cubic meters.

f Ft m3 Amount of solid radwaste shipped of' site for processing during current month : 1040 29.4 Volume of solid radwaste buried dur,ng October 1998 : 127.4 3.6 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste bu-led in 1998 : 603.7 17.08 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage : 000.0 00.00 f

The WANO industry Median is 54 cubic meters per year. The industry Best Quartile value is

( cpproximately 26 cubic meters per year.

D ta Source: Solymossy/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: None SEP54

[

l 21

SAFE OPERATIONS Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear organization. Individuals demonstrate professionalism through self-ownership and personal initiative and open communication.

I 22

f sums Enor Rate , FCS Goal -e-Rolkng Error Rate f 8 81 9 000 8.51 E 8.000 -

5 57

[ g. 7.000 - e.42 8 e.000 -

p g 5.000 - 4.39 3.65 L s 4.000 348 3.47 5 3 000 - 219 248 C - -

2.000 1.06 127 064

$ k W[W 1 WS.M 1 W 1 ,M,W Wh, J J B",

p*i * +

S

( o Personnel Error Rate The purpose of this indicator is to monitor human error events at FCS which are classified as a " Noteworthy Event,'

under the criteria specified in the Condition Report Program. Noteworthy events may be classified as level one, two, or three on a Condition Report or as defined but not limited to the examples listed below:

[ Error Rate = number of human errors x hours everv two weeks 100,000 hrs

1. A recordable injury in industrial safety.

( 2. Valve Mispositioning event caused by plant personnel.

3. Equipment tagging error that significantly impacts safe operation of the plant, readiness or personal safety.

4. Improper use of or failure to use safety equipment or performing a task in an unsafe manner.

( 5. Any event involving loss of radioactive material control that may cause or potentially result in an individual receiving an unauthorized exposure.

6. Any spill or spread of radioactive material, which results in an impact on the plant or the general safety of plant

( 7.

personnelor the generalpublic.

Failure to utilize, or adhere to sound radiation principles, or accepted admir,istrative controls to keep occupational radiation exposure, or exposure to members of public ALARA.

8. Chemistry parameter (s) out of specification, involving insufficient chemis'fy corrective action or oversight.

[

9. Violation of procedure or human performance error.

10. Less than 3 deep (qualified members) in minimum staffing position for the Control Room, TSC, OSC, and EOF.

( 11.

12.

Any unplanned impact to offsite evacuation routes or relocation capa'aility.

Any failure or theft of emergency response equipment or supplies necessary to complete classification, notification, protective action recommendation or ERO command & control functions.

13. Inadequate training or quahfication.

( 14. Failure to adequately staff the ERO in actual responses or drill notification.

The Rolling Error Rate is calculated over the past 12 month period. Until 12 months of data are

{ available, this line is considered information only.

Data Source: Tesar/Burggraf(Manager / Source)

{ Accountability: Solymossy/Tesar Trend: None f

L 23

m Monthly Recordable injury / Illness Rate f- 1998 F.C.S. Goal (1.5) 1.68 1.6 1.2 -

0.82 0.8 - 0.63 0.53 0.33 0.4 - o,3 0.23 0 , ,- ,- --

r- ,- ,- ,-- , ,

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec f

(

RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE

[ This indicator shows the monthly Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if personnel from any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job cnd require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid.

There were three recordable injuries for the month of October 1998. One Employee twisted their

[ knee, an employee pulled their hamstring,and another fractured their left wrist. The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date recordable injury rate is 1.68. The goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.

Data Source: Sorensen/Gunn (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short

{ Trend: None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 f

L 24 I -

[

3 Contamination Events (Monthly)

E Contamination Events (YTD) 100- 96 90 - g4 80 - 77 70 65 60 -

50 -

40 - 36 30 -

20 m m _.

, __,_ m ,_ m , , ,

a.n r. b u., Apr u.y aun sui

[ aus s., oct nov D.c

[

CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >1,000

.[ DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for

( contaminations >_1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for October 1998.

There were 6 personnel contamination events in October 1998. The total year-to-date of Personnel

{

events is 96 at the end of October 1998. This indicator has been classified as "Needing Increased Management Attention," due to an upward trend of Year to date contamination events over the past three months.

{

( Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability : Solymossy/Short Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 15 & 54 L 25 r

-+-Total Eve nts 35 - --e-- Pro ve nta ble

--*-Personel Error 18 Month Totals 30 -

25 -

26 25 25 2 20 ' 21 22 24 24 15 15 - 12 3 13 13 13 13 13

_ _ 12

- f1 b f1 b k1 7

- S 5 7 7 7 6 7 7 6

0 .

m a a a a a a a a s s a s a s a s s i I4 4 II$ $$ $ $ $ $ I4 $ II PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs.

The graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnel Error LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the LER event date as opposed to the LER report date.

In September 1998, there was one (1) event which were subsequently reported as LER's.1 LER was categorized as " Preventable" and 1 LER was categorized as " Personnel Error" during the month of September. The total LERs for the year 1998 are twelve. The total Personnel Error LERs for the year 1998 are two.

The year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values for the 18-month totals not to exceed 5 Preventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs.

NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.

D:ta Source: Frans/Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None SEP 15 26

I Adnan sc 11%

7%

Lo Err.

11 %

Design 45% other Err.

19%

Maint.

7%

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by event date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past eighteen months from April 1997, through September 30, 1998. To be consistent with the Preventable / Personnel Error LERs indicator, this indicator is reported by the LER event date, as opposed to the LER report date.

The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.

NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-month behind.There was one event in September 1998 that resulted in an LER. There were no missed surveillance tests resulting in LERs during September 1998. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for this indicator is 0.

Data Source: Frans/Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 l

l 27

- 1 1997 NCViolations 15EBNCWiations 25 - 25 T

[ g 20 15

}+

o = , 3 1 ' ' ' #

Au '

h%k&WhM4%Mhk c m s e _

cn y >

4ER5&8 5A$oEb m NbrtNyMaimons 1997RrtCWhoinTotal m NtrtNyMdeans 1998RrtQinnTotal

-e-RaspanNBestQatne -e-RujanNEhetQartie VIOLATION TREND This indicator depicts the current year of violation data plus the past year of violation data for Fort Calhoun Station. Also depicted is the Region IV upper quartile for the current and past year.

The following inspection reports noting violations were issued during October 1998:

Violation Level lE m Title (2) IV 98-08 Maintenance Rule To date, OPPD has received ten violations for inspection reports issued in 1998.

Level ill Violations 0 Level IV Violations _1Q Total 10 The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the upper quartile plants in Region IV.

Data Source: Frans/Cavanaugh (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Frans Trend: None I

28 1

I l

4 COST Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that cost effectively maintains nuclear generation as an economically viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line. Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the organization.

29

l 12 Month Rolling Average

--*-- Actual -as-- Budget -*-- Plan LOO 3.50

[

l 4 1 -

a 3.00 - _ _ ._

e e

~

2.50 -

2.00 -

1.50 1.00 -+ - + - + - -

2 X R R  :: E E aaaa R R R R  : gggg kkk$kA$kk$$$$$$$k CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR

[ August 1998 The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current year. The

( bisis for the budget curve is the approved 1998 revised budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report.

[ The December 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1993 through 1997. In addition, the report shows the plan t cmounts for the years 1999 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the Nuclear Long Range Financial Plan and the 1998 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels.

The 12-month rolling average unit price period of ( October 1997 through September 1998) averaged above budget due to the extended refueling outage and less generation during the period. The 12 month rolling average is 3.24 cents per kilowatt hour.

The year-to-date (YTD) average is trending in a positive direction.

Cents Der KWH Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aua Sec Oct Nov De_q Budget YTD 3.02 2.85 3.27 4.13 3.80 3.53 3.37 3.21 3.13 3.08 3.01 2.96 Actual 2.96 2.85 3.00 3.26 4.16 4.39 4.03 3.77 3.59 Projected YTD 3.61* 3.50* 3.39* 3.29' NOTE: This information lags by a month due to the short turn around required for processing.

f

• Projected numbers reflect the values for YTD if the plant is to operate within budgets for the remaining period of the year.

Data Source: Gayoso/ Huang (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gayoso/ Huang Trend: Needing incresed Management Attention I 30

t

[

[

{

{

t DIVISION AND

[

[

DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE c INDICATORS

(

Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station I resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power production.

[

{

{

31

l t

[

muuus Corre c tive M ainte na nc e m Pre ve ntive M aintena nc e C Non Corre ctive/Pla nt im prove m e nts Corrective M ainte na nc e Goal (2..)

.... ,,, .., re r>>

r., ...

[. .... .ri ... ..r -

4.. 332

[ ...

4..-

.- -+- -4 E+B--+- -+ B+E-+ E-+- +E-+ E-+-- Ew 4

[ l E i  ! l 5 i .l 5  ! R 8 Non-Outa ge M ainte na nc e W ork Doc um e nt Bac klog a Tote lMWDs PERCENT OF MW D'S PAST GOAL BY PRIORITY MWD PRIORITY Priority 2 Priority 1 100%

600 0%

Priority *,

500-98.6%

400 - 312

[ 300-200 -

69 50 'I 100- 0 3 83%

0 ---

E -+- - -+ E -4 Rority Rority Riority Reority Riority 1 2 3 4 5

[

[ MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end

[ of the reporting month,a breakdown by maintenance classification and priority. The 1998 goal for this indicator is 200 non-outage corrective maintenance MWDs. The current backlog of corrective MWDs is 46 totals include a manual count of RAMS work orders. Currently RAMS can not be queried for a report. The

( manual count in RAMS is subject to error. Non-outage maintenance completion goals have been established cs follows:

G.QAl

( Priority 1 Priority 2 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 7 days Priority 3 30 days Priority 4 90 days Priority 5 As resources permit Note: Data provided is the most accurate available; until Rams is capable of generating reports.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens

{ Trend: None SEP 36 r

L 32

(

emumm Ratio of P reventive to Total M aintenance Fort Calhoun G oal 65%

in0%

93%

90% 79%

80% 76% 79% 75% 75% 77%

74% 76%

70%

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

60% N 50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0% -- -

~ - - . - - - - - m- --

~ w n ,

Nov Dec Jsn Feb Mar A pr May June July Aug Sep Oct m Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2%

7% -

6.02%

6%-

~ 4.09 % 4.01 %

~~

3.06 3.03%

3% -- 2.60% 2.60 %

2%

0%

1%--- 0.80 % 0.50% 0.70%

0% - + + +  ; + + --+ E + + + + -i Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 93% for the month of October 1998.

The lower graph shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that were not completed by the late finish date. From the period of (September 15th thru October 15th) there were 7PM's that were completed late or not completed out of 456 scheduled. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue is a maximum of 2%.

Note: Data provided is the most accurate available; until Rams is capable of generating reports.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None ' SEP 41 & 44 i

L 33 i

L

{

I Human Performance CRs(Maintenance)

( 16 16 -

14 -

{ $ 12 - 11 a

y 10 -

~[ o y8 7

[ 6

[ 2 2 2 2 - 1 1 1 0-- + + + + + + + + +E, l -1 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS I (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of Condition Reports related to procedural noncompliance incidents assigned to the Maintenance Department.

{

{

Data Source: Clemens/Burggraf (Manager / Source)

( Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 f

f L 34 r

m Contaminated Radiation Controlied Area 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (6%)

6% --

6%- 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 48% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8%

4%.

3%-

2%-

1%--

0% - + --t- l  ; -t-- + -+-- + ,

-+  ; H Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that is contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of October 1998, the total contaminated area was 3383 square feet which is 4.8 percent of the RCA .

The monthly FCS goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Short Trend: None SEP 54 35

, m Monthly Poor Radiation Worker Practces e Total PRWP for 1998 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (<20) 25 -

~

18 18 18 18 15 15 - 14 11 10 -

5 33 3 3 2

I 0- + + + +

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Juy Aua Sep Oct Nov Dec i

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM i

The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work l Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. I j The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a mecos to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. This indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 month increasing trend of poor l radiation worker practices based on YTD.

During the month of October there were O PRWP identified.

l There have been a total of 18 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998.

l The 1998 FCS goal is <20 PRWPs, the 1997 goal was <15 PRWPs.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Short Trcnd: Needing increased Management Attention SEP52 l

36

m Documents Scheduled for Review E Document Reviews complete during month O Documents Overdue 300 -

250 --

200 --

160 +

100 -

0+ + + +- + + + -t + + 4 -a m Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct 1997-1998 DOCUMENT REVIEW The Document Review indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.The documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During October 1998, there were 73 document reviews scheduled, while 19 reviews were completed. At the end of the month, there were 0 document reviews more than 6 months overdue.

There were 2 new documents initiated during October 1998.

Data Source: Ponec/Plath (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Ponec Trend: Positive SEP 46 l

37

35 -- --

i 30 - -

1 25 - - --

1. N 20 - -- - -

, -- N ;- -

! '% l 15 - -

• • *= /

\ . ,- -!

. s% ,

N 10 - - - - - - - - I-l s .. . .

0- - - - - - - - --

J'

, , , , , i i JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 98 Loggables 98 Non-Loggables

• 97 Loggables - + - - 97 Non-Loggables

__j SECURITY INCIDENTS The Loggable and Non-Loggable Incident (Security) Indicators are depicted in the chart above. The chart depicts the total number of loggable and non-loggable human error events and system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of October 1998, there were sixteen (16) loggable incidents and eight (8) non-loggable incidenis identified (excluding access denials). Of all incidents identified this month four (4) were human error events. Of loggable events, only one (1) was a human performance error and fifteen (15) were system failures. There were three (3) internal human performance errors in October. There was one (1) non-loggable access denial during the reporting period. Improved human performance continues to be a departmental priority.

Data Source: Sefick/ Clark (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Trend: None SEP 58 38

I m Terrporary Wdifications >1 fuel cycle old (RFO required for renovafj m Terrporary Wdifications >6 nunths old (Rerrovable on-line)

- Fort Calhoun Goals for both Tenporary Wdifications' categories (0) 7-I 6-6 5-4-

3-2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the number of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of TMs removable on-line that are greater than six months old. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goals for both of the TM categories are zero.

I At the end of October 1998, there were no TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for removal.

At the end of October 1998, there were six (6) TM's installed that were greater than six months old which could be removed on-line. DCN #0006121 (TM 96-039), Railroad Siding /Corrioor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996. DCN I #0006164 ( TM 97-021), CCW corrosion monitor, was installed February 18,1998. DCN #0006165 (TM 97-022), LPSI Header Pressure Gauge at PT-325, was installed December 12,1997. DCN #0006186 (TM 98-003), F1-1112, FW-54 Suction Flow Indicator, was installed March 16,1998. DCN #0006187 (TM 98-004), TPCW System Corrosion Monitor was installed March 24,1998. DCN #0006188 (TM 98-005), YlT 6286 A&B YlT 6288 A&B was installed February 27,1998.

At the end of October 1998, there was a total of eleven (11) TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. Three (3) of the eleven (11) installed TMs require a RFO for removal and eight (8) are removable on-line. In 1998, a total of twenty one (21) TMs have been installed. At the end of October 1998, there were four (4) procedural or maintenance configuration a!terations (PMCAs) (a special classification of TM) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station using PRC approved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order O-25.

Data Source: Skiles/Plott (Manager / Source)

I Accountability: Skiles/ Core Trend: Adverse SEP 62&71 l

l I

39 1

Total Modification Packages Open 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (68) 70 ,

65 65 -

62 61 Data Not Available May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of Outstanding Modifications (excludina outstandina modifications which are orocosed to be cancelled).

Reporting Cateaorv '90 '94 .'Q5

.2B '91 '93 '9_Q Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress 0 0 0 0 3 20 23 Construction Backlog /In Progress 1 0 3 4 17 1 26 Design Engr. Update Backlog /In Progress _E 4 _2 _1 _0 0 _12 Totals 6 4 5 5 20 25 65 (Outage + OnLine) (2+4) (2+2) (5+0)(1+4) (16+4) (18+7)

The 1998 year-end Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 68 outstanding modifications.

NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski Trend: None 40

L NO DATA AVAILABLE

[

[

[

ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST BREAKDOWN

[

This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering and System

( Engineering. The 1998 year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum of 120 outstanding EARS.

[

[ NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

[

{

Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skile/Jaworski

[ Trend: None SEP 62

{

{

{

r L

41 r

NO DATA AVAILABLE ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Skiles Trend: None SEP 62 42

[

[

{

{

NO DATA AVAILABLE

{

[

[

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE OPEN

{

[

NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

[

Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

( Accountability: Jaworski/Skiles Trend: None SEP 62

{

I 43

b

( m #SSCs Exceeding Unavailability Criteria e # SSCs Monitored

-*-% Exceeding Unavailability Criteria

( 70 4'5%

63 m 60 A 4.0%

52 b 51 \ 51 49 50 3.5%

= 50 40 2 f @ 30 2.0%

$ 20 .

1.5%

j -

1.0%

( 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0.5%

0 0.0%

4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 2-98 3-98 Quarter Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability As of the third quarter of 1998, only one SSC, the non-safety related inverter, EE-4S, is

[ exceeding it's three year unavailability performance criteria. Performance is indicative of success in Maintenance, Planning & Scheduling, and Operations efforts to control equipment out of service time.

{

b

(

(

[ Data Source Skiles/Swearngin/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles Trend: None f

( 44

I O Total Requalification Training Hours a SimulatorTrainingHours a Non-Requalification Training Hours a Number of Exam Failures 35 -

33 32 I

32 -

31 30 -

25 -

20 20 - 18 15 - 4 14 2 2 10 -

88 8 8 8 8 88 6- 4 3

0 0 0 00 0 0 O-I r -r -r ,-- ,- r r- -

Cycle 97-6 Cycle 97-7 Cycle S81 Cycle 98-2 Cycle 98-3 Cycle 98-4 Cycle 98-5 Cycle 98-6 I

l LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew I during each cycle. The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

l Note: All examination failures were remediated without impacting the operations shift schedule.

Data Source: Westcott/Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Westcott/Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 45

l l E SROExams Administered 4 l E SRO Exams Passed I

! E RO Exams Administered i El RO Exams Passed 17 16 - '

12 12 12 1212 10 7 -

j i

! 5 44 44 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 5 l 0 ' '

i 4 2

4 'l 'H I Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct I

LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 190s This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These intemally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates monthly progress.

During the month of October 1998, there were 12 (SRO) exams administered and 18 (RO) exams administered.12 SRO exams were passed and 17 RO exams were passed.

Additionally, D PRO and 5 RO candidates took the NRC Generic Fundamentals examination.

Results havti rl yet beGa received. They will be reported next month.

Data Source: Westcott/Guliani (Manager / Source)

E Accountability: Westcott/Guliani

!E Trend: Positive SEP 68 I

46

mIvtEONH LD E MWRS NOT YEr FHoCESSED 700- 645 600-500 - 473 MWD HOLDS 400 358 DATA UNAVAILABLE 300-176 200 - 390 100 -

0-Aug-98 Sep-98 oct-98

[

[

MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in Cycle 18 RFO. This graph

[ indicates:

Parts Holds - Planning Complete, Awaiting Parts System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering input to Planning Phnner Holds - Maintenance Planner has not completed planning the work package.

b -

ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacement items ECN from DEN.

In Review- Planning Complete awating SE, ISI and QC review.

NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

[

Data Source: Soiymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sollymossy/ Herman

(. Trond: None SEP 31

(

[ 47 I

m LAST E THIS O FOR SCHEDULE 100 -

90 -

80 -

70 -

60 -

50 -

40 -

30 -

20 - 1 10 - 6 8 6 666 666 6 6 4 66 4 76 66 6 66 4 76 0 --

i i i i i i i- ,- 4

$ o .E E .$ E E .6 .6 E' E $ $ R 1 is i; u u I E $ 5 t 9 7 3 > b b E  ? E Q b & E 2 8  ?

E S 3 6 8 8 .6 I 5 '

O

$ $ 3 h g m

5 b 8 E o I @ 2 3 ro < .

's 1

I COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I 1999 OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT Data Source Skiles/Bloy J/Boughter (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Bloy:f/Boughter Trend: None SEP 31 f

[

t 48 r

• ActualPRCDate a Target FRC Date 6/15/99 -

5/26/99 -

5/6/99 -

4/16/99 -

3/27/99 -

m a a a a a a a m a a a 3rl/99 ~

2/15/99 -+

O t S 5 9 8 8 E 8 3 S m

8 o

2 e

2 m

2 e

3 a

3 m

m 2

a 2

a 2

m 3

a PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage (September 1999).

The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were approved for accomplishment prior to September 25,1998, PRC approved by March 18,1999.

October 1998 Modifications added: 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 49

[

[

[

There Have Been No MODS or ECNs

[

added since Freeze Date

[

[

. PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND ECN'S ADDED TO 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER

[ FREEZE DATE This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle

{ 19 Refueling Outage. The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their target date. Target date is September 25,1998.

October 1998 Modifications /ECN's Added = 0 Deleted = 0

[

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski

[ Trend: None SEP 33

[

[

{

50

[

L

+ Actual Approw Date a Target Approw Date 10G8/98 am , ,

9/28/98 -

6/29/98 -

f

,5 f 7/30/98 - g$

6/30/98 - k 5/31/98 -

5/1/98 -

4/1/98 -

3/2/98 -

1/31/98 *

{

$$}$$$h ee88888 m w w w w f

PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING

( This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for a,oproval for on-line installation during 1998.

The goal for this indicator is to have all MOD /ECN packages approved by their scheduled date.

{

f October 1998 MOD /ECN Added:0 Deleted: 0 f Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 f

f 51 l

r

i i

I

, ACTION PLANS i SEP INDEX 1

1 I

I I

[

[

[ 52 e

ACTION PLANS This section lists action plans that have been developed for the performance indicators cited as Adverse Trends dunng the month preceding this report.

Aho included are Action Plans for indicators that have been cited in the preceding month's report as Needing increased Management Attention in I tecordance with Revision 5 of NOD-QP-37, for tnree (3) consecutwe months Adverse Trends

. Temporary Modifications (page 39) i Based on the current trend of Temporary Modifications >6 months old (removable on-line) the Temporary Modifications Indicator is classified as "Needs increased Management Attention". Presently, there are six (6) Temporary Modifications which have been installed greater than six months An action plan has been developed to expedite removal of the TMs and increase management's awareness of the issue System Engineering will be actwely pursuing resolution on closure of these Temporary Modifications.

i Needina increased Manaaement Attention

+ Emergency AC Power (page 15)

This indicator was high in July and August due to planned maintenance. For 9e first time, diesel refueling frequency tasks were performed on l line Approximately 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> was required on each diesel for on line mainte sance The decision to perform on-line maintenance was a management decision with full knowledge that unavailability would increase It is expected that unavailability will go down to previous low levels for the next 12 months.

+ Collective Radiation Exposure (page 19)

Fort Calhoun management is fully aware of the Station approaching the 1998 Collectwe Radiation Exposure to&l dose goal of 224 person-Rem.

i The following actions have been taken at Fort Calhoun Station to ensure all personnel are aware of this goal:

The distnbution of "FCS On-Line" newsletter which explained the Collectwe Radiaation Exposure goal and reinforced ALARA concepts to personnel.

I .

Development of an expectation by the Radiativn Protection Department in which radiaron workers are expected to know radiological conditions and RWP requirements before entenng the Radiologically Controlled Area instead of relying on the Radiation Protection staff to provide that information.

I .

A Radiation Worker Enhancement Program is being instituted at Fort Calhlun Station to improve radiation worker knowledge and practices.

The 1998 Collective Radiation Exposure goal will be a challenge for Fort Calhoun Station to meet, but the actions stated above will help mitigate the chance of exceeding the goal.

• Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (page 25)

The Routine Decon 5 edule was revised to improve the daily maintenance of clean areas in the RCA A status sheet with a sign-off will provide administratwe guidance and controls to ensure clean areas are being property maintained by a designated responsible person. These improvements should result in less Clean Controlled Area Contaminations I e Cents Per Kilowatt Hour (page 30)

The increased cost has been due to the unexpected refueling outage extension which also caused the higher expenditures and the less power gInerated. Nuclear Planning Department has initiated cost awareness efforts by distnbuting the monthly update on power generation, O/M cost End Capital cost to all nuclear departments and year-to date cost data to all nuclear personnel in addition, the Nuclear organization is developing the 1999 Business Plan based on the Six Factor Formula -CHOICE to address the issues and actions on safe operations, high performance and competitive cost The effectiveness of the Business Plan will be evaluated routinely by the nuclear management team.

l I

I i 53 L

e F

ACTION PLANS

• Radiological Work Practices Program (page 36)

Changes in the initial General Employee Training (GET) Program are being addressed by a Training Advisory Committee to make program improvements The OrW ine Poor Radiation Worker Practices were recently 6dentifed by CR 199801434. Implementation of the Actions items listed balow are being addressed by the Condition Report, which should result in an increased awareness for Improving Rad Worker Pracitices in the RCA Define the role of the Shift RP Technician to reduce over relianace on the RP Staff and ensure Rad Workers have sufficient knowledge pnor to accessing the RCA.

Perform a Human Pertbrmance evaluattun of the Survey Maps used by the Red Workers

• Evaluate the ettectiveness of the postings usedin the RCA

• Evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the information provided at en RCA Access Control Point.

• Ensure the RP Shift Tech has the appropiate information available.

• Evaluate the content and methods of the GET Program.

• Evaluate the effectiveness of the postings used in the RCA-54

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX This indicator index is calculated from a weighted 4) Critical means that during the steady-state combination of eleven performance indicator values, condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the which include the following: Unit Capability Factor, effective multiplication (k , ) was essentially Unplanned Capability Loss Factor, HPSI, AFW, equal to one

( Emergency AC Power System, Unplanned Automatic ( Page 12)

Scrams, Collective Radiation Exposure, Fuel Reliability, Thermal Performance, Secondary System Chemistry, and HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM Industrial Safety Accident Rate. SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

( Page 6 )

The sum of the known (planned and unplanned)

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for the high pressure safety injection system for the reporting The ratio of the available energy generation over a given period divided by the critical hours for the reporting period time period to the reference energy generation (the energy multiplied by the number of trains in the high pressure thct could be produced if the unit were operated safety injection system. (Page 13) continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM percentage. ( Page 10 ) PERFORMANCE UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for

[ The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given the auxiliary feedwater system for the reporting period

{ period of time, to the reference energy generation (the divided by the critical hours for the reporting period snergy that could be produced if the unit were operated multiplied by tl e number of trains in the auxiliary continuously at full power under refererice ambient feedwater system. t conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a ( Page 14 )

percentage. ( Page 11 )

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER PERFORMANCE 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS

{ The sum of the known (planned and unplanned)

This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned unavailab'e and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the cutomatic scrams (RPS logic actuations) that occur per emergency AC power system for the reporting period 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of critical operation. divided by the number of hours in the reporting period multiplied by the number of trains in the emergency AC The value for this indicator is calculated by multiplying the power system.( Page 15)

[

total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams in a i tpecific time period by 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />, then dividing that THERMAL PERFORMANCE number by the total number of hours critical in the same time period. The indicator is further defined as follows: The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage.

1) Unplanned means that the scram was not an ( Page 16) anticipated part of a planned test.

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of negative reactivity This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant (e g , by control rods, liquid injection system, etc.) 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution that is caused by actuation of the reactor and normalized to a common punfication rate. Tramp protection system. The signal may have resulted uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core from exceeding a set point or spurious. intemals from previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process.

3) Automatic means that the initial signal that Steady state is defined as continuous operation for at least caused actuation of the reactor protection system three days at a power level that does not vary more than +

logic was provided from one of the sensor's or -5E Plants should collect data for this indicator at a monitoring plant parameters and conditions, power level above 85%, when possible. Plants that did not rather than the manual scram switches or, operate at steady-state power above 85% should collect manual turbine trip switches (or data for this indicator at the highest steady-state power level push-buttons) p ovided in the main controlroom. attained during the month, i

55

{

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS The density correction factor is the ratio of the specific tracks personnel performance for SEP #25,26 & 27.

volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature (540 (Page 20 )

degrees F., Vf = 0.0217) divided by the specific volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 F at outlet of VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE the letdown cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163), which r:sults in a density correction factor for FCS equal to 1.33. This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid

( Page 17 ) radioactive waste actually shipped for burisl. This indicator also shows the volume of low-level radioactive waste which SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE is in temporary storage, the amount of radioactive oil that INDEX has been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste which has been shipped off-site The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation for processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of

b sed on the concentration of key impunties in the dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms

{ sicondary side of the plant. These key impunties are the generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated Criteria for calculating the CPI are: rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of

1) The plant is at greater than 30 percent power; and at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all

2) the power is changing less than 5% per day. radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work The CPIis calculated using the following equation: performance for SEP #54. ( Page 21 )

CPI = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chlonde/1.52) +(Sulfate /1.44) + RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY f (Iron /3.30) + (Copper /0.30)+(Condensate O2/2.90))/6 RATE Where: Sodium, sulfate, chloride and condensate dissolved The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid j oxygen are the monthly average blowdown concentrations per 200,000 man-hours worked. This indicator trends

( in ppb, iron and copper are monthly time weighted average personnel performance for SEP #15,25 and 26.

feedwater concentrations in ppb. The denominator for eaof ( Page 24 )

the five factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly everage for a specific parameter is less than the INPO CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS t 1,000 median value, the median value is used in the calculation. DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA

( Page 18) The personnel contamination events in the clean controlled area. This indicator tracks personnel performance for SEP COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE #15 & 54. ( Page 25 )

f Coliective radiation exposure is the total extemal whole-body PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs dose received by all on-site personnel (including This indicator is a breakdown of LERs For purposes of LER event contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured classification, a

• Preventable LER' is defined as' by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of person-rem. This An event for which the root cause is personnel error (i e.,

indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54 inappropnate action by one or more individuals). inadequate

( Page 19 ) administrative controls, a design construction, installation, installation, fabrication problem (involving work completed by or INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING supervised by OPPD personnel) or a maintenance problem INJURY /lLLNESS RATE (attnbuted to inadequate or improper upkeep / repair of plant equipment). Also, the cause of the event must have occurred The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in within approximately two years of the " Event Date" specified in the improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel LER (e g., an event for which the cause is attributed to a problem permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours with the onginal design of the plant would not be considered cre not included in this indicator. Also, this indicator is preventable) d; fined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel pIrmanent!y assigned to the station, involving days away For purposes of LER event classification, a " Personnel from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). Error" LER is defined as follows:

This does not include contractor personnel. This indicator I

56

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS An event for which the root cause is inappropriate action on VIOLATION TREND the part of one or more individuals (as opposed to being cttributed to a department or a general group). Also, the This indicator is defined as Fort Calhoun Station Cited inappropriate action must have occurred within Violations and Non-Cited Violations trended over 12 months.

approximately two years of the " Event Date" specified in the Additionally, CitedViolations for thr, top quartile Region IV LER. Additionally, each event classified as a " Personnel plant istrended over 12 months (lagging the Fort Error" should also be classified as " Preventable." This CalhounStation trend by 2-3 months). It is the FortCalhoun indicator trends personnel performance for SEP ttem #15. Station goal to be at or below the cited violation trend for

( Page 26 ) thetopquartileRegion IV plant.

( Page 28 )

a LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR This indicator shows the number and root cause code for The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per ki'owatt follows: hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per

1) Administrative Control Problem -

kilowatt hour on a twelve-month average for the current year.

Management and supervisory deficiencies that The basis for the budget curve is the approved yearfy affect plant programs or activities (i.e., poor budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and planning, breakdown or lack of adequate Operating Report.

management or supervisory control, incorrect ( Page 30 )

procedures, etc).

MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG

2) Licensed Operator Error - This cause code captures errors of omission / commission by This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance licensed reactor operators during plant Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting activities. month. Maintenance classifications are defined as follows:

Corrective - Repair and restoration of equipment or I 3) Other Personnel Error - Errors of omission / commission committed by non-components that have failed or are malfunctioning and are not performing their intended function.

licensed personnel involved in plant activities.

Preventive - Actions taken to maintain a piece of I 4) Maintenance Problem - The intent of this cause code is to capture the full range of problems which equipment within design operating conditions, prevent equipment failure, and extend its life and are performed can be attributed in any way to programmatic deficiencies in prior to equipment failure.

the maintenance functional organization. Activities included I. in this category are maintenance, testing, surveillance, Non-Corrective / Plant improvements - Maintenance calibration and radiation protection. activities performed to implement station improvements or to repair non-plant equiptront.

Design / Construction / Installation / Fabrication I 5)

Problem - This cause code covers a full range Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as:

of programmatic deficiencies in the areas of design, construction, installation, and Emergency - Conditions which significantly degrade fabrication (i.e., loss of control power due to station safety or availability.

underrated fuse, equipment not qualified for the environment, etc.). Immediate Action - Equipment deficiencies which significantly degrade station reliability. Potential for unit I

6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece-Parts shutdown or power reduction.

or Environmental-Related Failures) - This code is used for spurious failures of electronic Operations Concern - Equipment deficiencies which piece-parts and failures due to meteorological hinder station operation.

conditions such as lightning, ice, high winds, etc. Generally, it includes spurious or one- Essential Routine corrective rnaintenance on essential time failures. Electric components included in station systems and equipment. '

this category are circuit cards, rectifiers, bistables, fuses, capacitors, diodes, resistors, Non Essential - Routine corrective maintenance on non-etc.in addition this indicator reports SEP # 6 & essential station systems and equipment.

61. (Page 27) c

~ 57

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS Plant improvement - Non-corrective maintenance and plant TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS improvements.This indicator tracks maintenance The number of temporary mechanical and electrical performance for SEP #36. ( Page 32 ) configurations to the plant's systems.

RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE & 1) Temporary configurations are defined as PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance which are installed in the plant operating tssting and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage systems and are not shown on the latest corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed wiring, or flow diagrams.

as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours. Also displayed are the percent of proventive maintenance items 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for in the month that were not completed or administratively Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, closed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures or 25% of the scheduled interval. This indicator tracks Operating preventive maintenance activities for SEP #41. ( Page 33 ) Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless the jumper or PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS block remains in place after the test or (MAINTENANCE) procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not The number of identified incidents conceming maintenance considered as temporary modifications.

procedural problems, the number of closed li's related to the use of procedures (includes the number of closed irs 3) Scaffold is not considered a temporary caused by procedural noncompliance), and the number of modification. Jumpers and blocks which are closed procedural noncompliance lRs. This indicator trends installed and for which Mrs have been personnel performance for SEP #15,41 and 44. ( Page 34) submitted will be considered as temporary modifications until final resolution of the MR CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings. This The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which indicator tracks temporary modifications SEP includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and #62 and 71.

areas of the C/RP building, that is contaminated based on ( Page 39) the total square footage. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #54. ( Page 35) ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR)

BREAKDOWN RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM This indicator shows a breakdown, by age and priority of the The number of identified poor radiological work practices EAR, of the number of EARS assigned to Design (PRWPs) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks Engineenng Nuclear and System Engineering. This indicator radiological work performance for SEP #52. ( Page 36) tracks performance for SEP #62. ( Page 41 )

DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed, the number of documents scheduled The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were for review, and the number of document reviews that are completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion by overdue for the reporting month. A document review is DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks considered overdue if the review is not complete within six performance for SEP #62.

months of the assigned due date. This indicator tracks ( Page 42) performance for SEP #46. ( Page 37 )

SECURITY INCIDENTS The total number of security incidents for the reporting month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks security performance for SEP #58. ( Page 38) 58

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS DEFINITIONS l

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL 1 This indicator b eaks down the number of Engineering SERVICES ENGINEERING 19980UTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineenng Nuclear (DEN), System Engineenng, and This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

I Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility Changes open. ECN Substitute Replacement items open,

( Page48) cnd ECN Document Changes open. This indicator tracks PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE performance for SEP #62. ( Page 43) MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. This The total number of hours of training given to each crew I during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator training indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31. ( Page 49) hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), the PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND ECN'S number of non-REQUALIFICATION training hours and the ADDED TO '99 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE I number of exam failures. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP # 68. ( Page 45)

DATE This indscator will show the status of Modifications and LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle 19 I Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for SEP This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quizzes #33.

cnd exams that are administered and passed each month. ( Page 50)

This indicator tracks training performance for SEP #68.

I ( Page 46) Progress of 1998 On-Line modification Planning MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 19 REFUELING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or l OUTAGE) in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.

This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work ( Page 51 ) ,

Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents I (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance #31

( Page 47) l l

L 59

( SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM lNDEX

[ The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list performance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.

f SEP Reference Number 16 Eagg e increase HPES and IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . .. . . . . 34 f Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . .. . . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations 21,000 Disintegrations / Minute Per Probe Area . 25 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs .. . .. . . . . . . 26 SEP Reference Numbers 26. 26. & 27 j e Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented t e Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements e implement Supervisory Enforcement of industrial Safety Standards Industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate . . . .. 20 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate .. .. . .. . 24 SEP Reference Number 31

. Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 19 Refueling Outage) .. . . . 47 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects . .. . 48 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . . .. . 49 Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . .. . . 51 SEP Reference Number 33 e Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to '99 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date . . . 50 SEP Reference Number 36

-

• Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) . . ... . 32 SEP Reference Numbers 41 & 44

• Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule

[ e Compliance With and Use of Procedures Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance & Preventive Maintenance items Overdue .. 33 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . . 34 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program f Document Review .. . ... . .. .. . .. . 37 L 60

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM lNDEX l

SEP Reference Number 62 Eagt

• Estabilsh Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program . . . . .. . . 36 SEP Reference Number 64

• Complete implementation of Radiologic al Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure . . ... .. .. . . ... . 19 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste .. . .. . 21 Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations >1.000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area . .

_ . . . 25 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . ... .... . . . 35 SEP Reference Number 68

• Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Security incidents .. .. . ..... . . . .. . 38 SEP Refetince Numbers 60 & 61

• Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program e Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests resulting in Licensee Event Reports 27 SEP Reference Number 62

• Establish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications . . . . .. . .. . . . 39 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . 41 Engineering Change Notice Status . .. .. . . . 42 Engineering Change Notices Open . . . .. 43 SEP Reference Number 68

• Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requalification Training . . 45 License Candidate Exams .. . . . . . 46 SEP Reference Number 71

• Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Mod $ cations . . 39 t

l 61

c )

[

Fort Calhoun Station Operating

[ Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates l EVENT l DATE RANGE l PRODUCTION (MWH) l CUMULATIVE (MWH) l Cycle 7 12/21/81-12/03/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Cycle 8 04/06/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Cycle 9 07/12/84-09/28/85 4,741,468 32,477,893 Cycle 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646

( Cycle it 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 f Cycle 12 01/31/89-02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 Cycle 13 05/29/90-02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 Cycle 14 05/03/92-09/25/93 4,981,485 56,022,013 Cycle 15 11/26/93-02/20/95 5,043,887 61,065,900 Cycle 16 04/14/95-10/05/96 5,566,108 66,632,007

{

Cycle 17 11/25/97-04/01/98 5,183.108 71,815,678 Cycle 18 06/04/98-10/02/99

{

CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Lengest Run (477 Days) June 8,1987-September 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH-Cycle 13) May 29,1990-February 1,1992 Shortest Refueling Outage (53 days) February 20,1995-April 14,1995 f October 4,1996-November 27,96

{

r L

62

1 MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SOURCES WANO PERFORMANCEINDICATORS AREIN BLUE Indicator Source Extension INPO Noteworthy /Significant Events . .. . Donna Guini. 6M7 Unit Capability Factor Unplanned Capability Factor Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams per 7000 Hours Critical . Mike Edwards 6929 High Pressure Safety injection System Safety System Performance . . Chuck Schaffer 68F Auxiliary Feedwater System Safety System Performance Craig Fritts 6554 Emergency AC Power System Safety System Performance . Rich Ronning 6887 Thermal Performance . . . . . . Kevin Naser 6889 Fuel Releability Indicator . Rich Roenigk 7214 Secondary System Chemistry . . Mark Ostien 7109 Industrial Safety Accident & Disabling injury / Illness (Lost-Time Accident Rate)

Recordable injuryllliness Frequency Rate . Duane Booth 6558 Collective Radiation Exposure Clean Controlled Area Contaminations Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area Radiological work Practices Program . . . Colette Williams 7163 Volume of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Mark Breuer 7193 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown . Erick Matzke 6855 Violation Trend . .

. Gary Cavanaugh 6913 Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . . Steve Sweamgin 6836 Cents Per Kilowatt Hour . .. .,

Claudio Huang 6626 63 l

l

l MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SOURCES i

l Indicator Source Extension l McIntenance Workload Backlog Ratio of Preventive to Total Main:enance Preventive Maintenance items Overdue MWD Planning Status (Cycle 18 Refueling Outage) . . . . Martin Johnson 6956 l Personnel Error Rate Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . Mike Burggraf 6675 1

Document Review . . . . . . . Judy Platn 7370 Securityincidents . . .. . . Al Clark 6666 TCmporary Modifications , . . . .. . Russ Plott 6557 Outstanding Modifications Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECNS Added to 1999 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date Progress of 1998 ON-Line Modification Planning . . . . . Pat Walling 6950 Engineering Assistance Request Breakdown Engineering Change Notice Status Engineering Change Notice Open . . . . . . Bemie Livingston 3870 Licensed Operator Requalification Training j License Candidate Exams-1998 . . . .. .. Greg Guliani 6025 Component Testing Department and Special Services Engineering Department 1999 Outage Projects Status Report . . Chris Boughter 6684 l

I l

l s l I

64

!