ML20117J226
| ML20117J226 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1983 |
| From: | INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20114F819 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-44 NUDOCS 8505150024 | |
| Download: ML20117J226 (46) | |
Text
. . ,, _ _ __ __
1 1
- e I l l l 1
1982 Evaluation i Surry Power Station 1
I Virginia E ec ric anc g
3ower Comoany I , e- If ? 2_- ,
- e. ec. ;
g gec- j I
. , , . . .. . - . .. w. . , u- .v.
.,w.,, _. _
- . . g > p . ,.- y..- ~m,.,_
,, - ; C. ; .g ...- .p.cy. .
- g. ..om.' . e._ .... ,_;p,;%
.-.M.,,... . .7%,p.g7 . . a ar_ , . .., z s.p. .,Jf.t. , w..m ..q . .g . .. >. .n. .
- .. - .... .,a . ;y ... .s .
i
- * : ~ ; .y .% .. n .t . . .-J.-
v*x -j*c;...-r:h -*>%..
. y ym-- oms ~.:
- y . .cu:
.. . . s ..
- l
~; .: . . e.-e :
f.,,x:n':il:;;
. .r. ' F *- " x q..:.c: ~ ; -JQ u c~r;3:o.c:.~ v M e rs.nNy...d,..;:f
- f~Wr.?.he:=f;"j,y? '
. .4.n.y- $;g.:g S v..g
- ..r, . .
- ,:y ..:^. - I
~ ~ . . <. m. c. ,,
.. . . ; 5.? ; L. .A..;s.
~ ~. ..> g. p. . %y;c;
.:~
, ,. g. .u. . ., ,
.,7.,.. ,-
- . . . . . ,.-. .. .- m ..s . , t -. .
~; ' .
3* - *
. .~ .rs . . . .
t
. ..s ...e .~e . - . w : '.;*.-
~-
. 4 '. . e,. .. . .s .. . . .. ..w ...6.: *<. .-. ,.r. t.~. -.**:7...-s.
.. . +ra. . . .n c . . .r* p,'*i-**-V .*e,~....h**.
E at* . s.
- . . af ,a -,~
1.- .
....."a_
i s . . .
,t
' , ,r .a . . . . . . . _. . _: .:..; ~;.f.
.,..,.:. .c .. r .: -
cca r ~ -c..u . :.:.* *L: .
&..,,;i,...c,,p:,
. ;;, ; ..L .?,.;,;.s?. '_.,. .c .
. . m. ,..,, . . . .
- c. - - ~
..,~.~;.. .: e.;, .'.%.- 4 :'. C. . .<
., . . ..3":
_!- T :4..l ~. .~. .,.+~. : r.*-
,.,.::..:. ;.~-
... s . w.. " :;,'.
c.
-C. ....- . .
. .. ,,n%: s. .-
.'-y. -
- r
- e . . . ...- < -. - -
. .e p . 4-* . . .,.,g.,.,,..+n]>..,j.
,. ,. e.,.. g g 4.,.q' W ~< sg .q.,
, : ; p. 4.,; . .: .., ,.,a,. ytsy,w,.z
.,, t ,.
. ~ + . .- . . . .
.,s- _ ,,,
' *J s , 5. ,. u.A. n,.,v..,, 4 k. :.* Q4,,.%... L,.
.. o. . < o. *[.'$ .k7.,,: , y. , ;,,.- c z.,?.~d_ R. . ,
, - ~ -
....;...s * '.' ,vay. i
. e, a.
. c . .-ba. . .~.Mn"c a,*. 4 ,. .n. . y . -
-l . 5, sa. .s . c4;; g :W.'. 4 G e. p 5,.? * ~ #
' t .
- %'t
.A .,a* U . ~
v . e- .'.%'
- 's. ;ec M).'.,,%. &*1 %. .*-p:s.f.,,,,, : ;.
- i,. : 'b
- ~ .: v *
.e. e L. e. s. -%.. ..m-m.,",.w..
. ,A.
..r-~ s.4. ,m s
....a c,..a ..s . .. . a. e. .;".,- . . .T . ..~' .a...A: ,, .
- s W . *
. . ' , i. .' . :t . .. . g .r . . .g .,-/. p, ,.h.. ;. y.,...
<. .- ..l
.. . '. t. : ... ,c.s .e p .
,g.eq.4.,,.,... .
. . ~,. 3 :.n.' .. c~ a.x m : .. _.. .w a tg;g' y .,.4 4..-
' .. f.;.. -;s ,
s to, ..: , ~.
. i ~- . . . , . .
v . .
.s p
G . .v e ; , . .. .. ;
'.;. .. ,"s.m'. :,,..,
. ~. . . r :s k .
- h. - .
.s.. . . :.s.'
- . . . . ,L .*,' ,1 ..g..',',, ^
m.,
?l-l;i.h.' ,;...
s p, .
... . . . . .,..g.. . .
. . . .. ;; w. . .. ,.
- a. . .. . . . . .
. . .. [ 'a '.'
- s. . .
. s 1. . _v.. .
- 4. .*
s.
i-6 8505150024 PDR 841121 - - '
FOIA '~
/" ' '- ' ' ' ~
l I TOTTEN84-44 PDR
~~ " ~ " ~ - ~
8
'e . .
- e e
EVALUATION
. of SURRY POWER STATION Virginia Electric and Power Company 8
March 1983
. - . _ . _ . . ~- ... . . . . . . . . - . - . . - . . . . . . - . . .
al. .
,. l SURRY (1982)
Page1
SUMMARY
DETRODUC110N The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) conducted an evaluation of Virginia Electric and Power Company's (VEPCO) Surry Power Station during the weeks of November 29 and December 6,1982. The station is located on the south bank of the James River on a point of land called Gravel Neck in Surry County, Virginia, and has two 775-Mwe (net) Westinghouse pressurized water reactors. Unit 1 began commercial _
operation in 1972 and Unit 2 in 1973.
9
~
PURPOSE AND SCOPE INPO conducted an evaluation of site activities to make an overall determination of plant safety, to evaluate management systems and controls, and to identify areas needing improvement. Information was assembled from discussions, interviews, obser-vations, and reviews of documentation.
The INPO evaluation team examined station organization and administration, oper-ations, maintenance, technical support, training and qualification, radiological pro-tection, and chemistry. The team also observed the actual performance of selected evolutions and surveillance testing. As a basis for the evaluation, INPO used performance objectives and criterie relevant to each of the areas examined; these were applied and evaluated in light of the experience of team members, INPO's observations,-
and good practices within the industry.
INPO's goal is to assist member utilities in achieving the highest standards of excellence in nuclear plant operation. The recommendations in each area are based on best practices, rather than minimum acceptable standards or requirements. Accord-ingly, areas where improvements are recommended are not necessarily indicative of unsatisfactory performance.
DETERMINATION i
. ._. . . . . - - - _ _ _ . . . - . _ . . __ . . . . . _ . - . . . ~ _ . . . . . ..
'a .
. i SURRY (1982)
Page 2
~
a each of the areas evaluated,INPO has established PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES and supporting criteria. All PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES reviewed during the course of this evaluation are listed in APPENDIX II.
Findings and recommendations are listed under the PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES to which they pertain. Particularly noteworthy conditions that contribute to meeting PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES are identified as Good Practices. Other findings describe conditions that detract from meeting the PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES. It would not be productive to list as Good Practices those things that are commonly done properly in the industry since this would be of no benefit to VEPCO or to INPO's other member utilities. As a result, most of the findings highlight conditions that need improvement.
The recommendations following each finding are Intended to assist the utility in ongoing efforts to improve all aspects of its nuclear programs. In addressing these findings and recommendations, the utility should, in addition to correcting or improving specific eenditions, pursue underlying causes and issues.
- -~
-w.
e .
e
, SURRY (1982)
Page 3 The evaluation staff appreciates the cooperation received from all levels of Virginia Electric and Powar Company.
g
_ ._._u... . .. . .;, . . . . . ._
L, ,
O SURRY (1982)
Page 4 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY Response Summary The INPO evaluation of Surry Power Station is one of several industrywide appraisals designed to improve the operation of commercial nuclear power stations beyond established regulatory requirements.
VEPCO fully supports this industry effort and the progressive criteria used to make the evaluation.
While the results of this evaluation showed that some areas at the station need improvement, INPO determined that Surry "is being operated in a safe manner by well qualified and experienced personnel."
The INPO findings and improvement recommendations grovided insights that will aid VEPCO in improving overall operations of Surry and North Anna.
INPO stated that improvements were recommended in a number of areas. VEPCO plans to make appropriate improvements in these areas and other areas discussed throughout the report.
VEPCO looks forward to the INPO evaluation of both of its nuclear statiov in 1983.
. L .. _ . . . - . . . . -. ..w. . : . .. - ; -. . . . . . . . - .
- o
, e o
SURRY (1982)
Page5 ORGANIZATION & ADMINISTRATION MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY PROGRAMS PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Management should assess station activities to ensure and enhance quality performance of all aspects of nuclear plant operation.
Findmg -
(OA.3-1)
INDUSTRIAL SAFETY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Station industrial safety programs should achieve a high degree of personnel safety.
Finding (OA.5-1)
Recommendation I
Respon.e
P'
~ . .- . .. u: . ;.z . . ..- <* ... .
..~._n.. . . - - . . .
e o e SURRY (1982)
Page 6 Finding (OA.5-2)
Recommendation
Response
Findmg (OA.5-3)
Recommendation
Response
. i SURRY (1982)
Page 7 DOCUMENT CONTROL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Document control systems should provide correct, read-Dy accessible information to support station requirements.
Finding (OA.6-1) -
Recommendation
Response
e
. . . . _ . . ..:...t. . . . . . , - . . . .
r SURRY (1982)
Page 8 OPERATIONS CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational activities should be conducted in a manner that achieves safe and reliable plant operation.
Finding ,
(OP.2-1)
Recommendation
Response
Finding (OP.2-2)
Recommendation
Response
~. _m..-- ._. . .. . ... a . .. . ._.,-;__,..,.___,_.
t
. 1
- SURRY (1982)
Page 9 9
PLANT STATUS CONTROLS -
PERFORMANCE OBJECnVE: Operational personnel should be cognizant of the status of plant systems and equipment neder their control, and should ensure that systems and equipment are controued in a manner that supports safe and reliable operation.
Finding (OP.3-1)
Recommendation l
- - ,-w--w-- y , - - - . - - . - , , , - - - ,-----,,-.w *- ,-,- -------,-.-,---v- < . - - . . -
...s. -
a a- h e m a .~ m - M m .s: _ . -o,, .m...
' ^'
.~,..-s .
,o
- 3 ,
, 8 SURRY (1982)
Page 10
Response
Finding (OP.3-2)
Recommendation
Response
Finding (OP.3-3)
S
. 1 SURRY (1982) l Page 11 Recommendation e
Response
4 Finding (OP.3-4)
Recommendation
Response
. . . . . _ . . . s..
-.m....;_.._. ._ _..... 2. - .u.. . . , .
t 1 SURRY (1982)
Page 12 Finding (OP.3-5)
OPERATOR KNOWLEDGE AND PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operator knowledge and performance should support safe and rehable plant operation.
Findmg (OP.4-1) i Recommendation
Response
c
n .
. I SURRY (1982) ne 13 l OPERATIONS PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational procedures and documents should provide appropriate direction and should be effectively used to support safe operation of the plant.
Finding (OP.5-1)
Recommendation
Response
~
, a OPERATIONS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational facilities and equipment should effectively support plant operation.
Findmg (OP.6-1)
Recommendation
Response
--- - - - - 4 - ,, _ -,___-._ye.-y,. . , -__-.w._. , ,r -.w ---y
,;.. . . . . _ _ _ _ _ - . . . . _ _ . _ . _ . _ . . . . . . - ~. ,
s SURRY (1982)
Page 14 Finding (OP.6-2)
Recommendation
Response
O
., t
. SURRY (1982)
Page 15 MAINTENANCE PLANT MATERIAL CONDrTION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The material condition of the plant should be main-tained to support safe and reliable plant operation.
Findmg _
(MA.2-1)
Recommendation
Response
i WORK CONTROL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The control of work should ensure that identified maintenance actions are properly completed in a safe, timely, and efficient manner.
l (MA.3-1) 1
SURRY (1982)
Page 16 Recsmmendation
Response
Finding (MA.3-2)
Recommendation
Response
Good Practice (MA.3-3)
. . . _ . . - - . - ~ . ~ - - . - _ -_
SURRY (1982)
Page 17 CONDUCT OF KAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Maintenance shoul.d be conducted in a manner that ensures efficient and effective plant operation.
Finding (MA.4-1)
Recommendation
Response
SURRY (1982)
Page 18 TECHNICAL SUPPORT OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PROGRAM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Industrywide and in-house operating experiences should be evaluated and apprognate actions undertaken to improve plant safety and reliability.
N , c. -
- v. i.-,- - -
4 SURRY (1982)
Page 19 Finding (TS.3-1)
Finding (TS.3-2)
Recommendation
Response
t Finding (TS.3-3)
Recommendation
Response
8 SURRY (1982)
Page 20 PLANT MODIFICATIONS PERFORMANCE OBJECnVE: Plant modification programs should ensure proper re-view, enetrol, implamentation, and completion of plant design changes in a safe and timely manner.
Finding (TS.4-1)
=
Recommendation ,
Response
TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION PERFORMANCE OBJECrlVE: Technical support procedures and documents should provide appropriate direction and should be effectively used to support safe operation of the plant.
Findir.g (TS.7-1)
Recommendation
Response
1 SURRY (1982)
Page 21 TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION TRAINING ORGANIZATION AND ADMINETRATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The training organization and administrative systems j should ensure affective control and implementation of traming activities.
Finding -
(TQ.1-1)
Recommendation
Response
(
SU F.Y (1982)
Page 22 NON-LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The non-11eensed operator trainm6 and qualification
, program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
Finding (TQ.2-1) _
Recommendation
Response
, e SURRY (1982)
Page 23 Pinding (TQ.2-2)
Recommendation
Response
LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PERFORMANCE OBJEC11VE: The licensed operator training and qualification program should develop and improve the knowkdge and skills nec.essary to perform assigned job functions.
Finding (TQ.3-1)
Recommendation j
SURRY (1982)
Page 24
~.
e Response -
~
MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIOgi PERPORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The maintenance personnel trainmg and qualification program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
Findmg (TQ.5-1)
Finding (TQ.5-2) ww
SURRY (1982)
Page 25 Recommendation
+ Response Finding (TQ.5-3)
Recommendation
Response
., t SURRY (1982)
Page 26 TRAINING FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE OBJECT, IVE: The training facilities, equipment, and materials should effectively support training activities.
Findmg (TQ.8-1)
Recommendation
Response
~
a
SURRY (1982)
Page 27 RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION ORGANIZATION AND ADIENISTRATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The orgamzation and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of the radiological protection program.
Findmg _
(RP.1-1)
Recommendation
Response
i Pinding (RP.1-2) 1 l
t b
- y. _.-,_m.--,. _ . . .__ _ . . , . -_ ,
= r -- , , . . . . % _. .-
- - - - = - . .- - - .
. . . . . ~ . . . . . .
SURRY (1982)
Page 28 Recommendation -
Response
Findmg (RP.1-3)
Recommendation
Response
EXTERNAL RADIATION EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: External radiation exposure controls should minimize personnel radiation exposure.
Firuling (RP.4-1)
I l
SURRY (1982)
Page 29 Recommendaiton -
Response
Findmg (RP.4-2)
Recommendation
Response
,. ,,- ,, _ _ . . ~ . . _ __. _ . _ . ._
SURRY (1982)
Page 30 INTEENAL RADIATION EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Internal radiation exposure controls should minimize internal exposures.
, ~. ... . . . . . ..
(RP.5-1)
Recommendation
Response
i Findmg (RP.5-2)
Recommendation
Response
SURRY (1982)
Page 31 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Solid radioactive waste controls should minimize the volume of radioactive waste and ensure safe transportation of radioactive material.
Finding (RP.7-1)
Recommendation
Response
i l
t i
l l
I i
l l
I 1
. *\
SURRY (1982)
Page 32 l l
CHEMISTRY l CHEMESTRY ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE OBJECIWE: The organization and administrative systems should ensure effective implementation and control of the chemistry program.
I -
Findmg (CY.1-1)
Recommendation
Response
l CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The chemistry quallfloation program should ensure that i
chemistry personnel have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to ircplement chemistry practices effectively.
Finding (CY.2-1) l l
~.
SURRY (1982)
Page 33 Recommendation
Response
CHE!ESTRY CONTROL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Chemistry controls should ensure optimum chemistry conditions during all phases of plant operation.
Finding (CY.3-1) ,
1 Recommendation 1
i
e SURRY (1982)
Page 34
Response
LABORATORY ACTIVITIES PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Laboratory and counting room activities should ensure accurate measuring and reporting of chemistry parameters.
(CY.4-1)
Recommendation
Response
l Finding (cy.4-2) 4 6
,. , , , , , , . - - , . . . - - , - - - ,--,-n--,, - - - - - - - - - . . . - - - , , . - - - - - - , - - ,
~_ .. . - - - . - . _ _ - - _ _ . . . . - , . , .
SURRY (1982)
Page 35
- ~
Recommendation e
Response
CHEMICAL AND LABORATORY SAFETY PERPORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Work practices -Inted with chemistry activities should ensure the safety of personnel.
pg .- -
(CY.5-1)
Recommendation
Response
O .__ _ _ . . ..
1 g
f
- SURRY (1982)
Page 36 Finding (C Y.5-2)
Recommendation
Response
e
. a . . . .
e
' SURRY (1982)
APPENDIX I Page1 APPENDIX I Summarv of Outstanding Response Action from Previous Evaluation (1981)
OPRRATIONS PACIIRIES AND EQUIPMENT Finding -
(OP.2-2)
Recommendation
Response
Status Finding [
(TS.4-2)
Recommendation
Response
e 6 vyMS Lu 5 W -
e e
e 9
SURRY (1982)
APPENDIX 1 Page2 Status Finding .
(TS.4-3)
Recommendation
Response
t .atus
. . l 1
.. s SURRY (1982)
APPENDIX II Page1 APPENDIX II Performance Objectives Reviewed ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION OA.1 Station Organization and Administration Station organization and administrative systems should ensure effective imple-mentation and control of station activities.
OA.2 Mission, Goals, and Objectives Station mission, goals, and objectives should be established and progress monitored through a formal program.
OA.3.1 Management Assessment Management should assess and monitor station activities to ensure effective performance of all. aspects of nuclear plant operation.
OA.3.2 Quality Programs Quality programs should ensure the effective performance of activities im-portant to nuclear safety.
OA.4 Personnel Planning and Qualification Personnel programs should ensure that station positions are filled by individuals with proper job qualifications.
OA.5 Industrial Safety Station industrial safety programs should achieve a high degree of personnel safety.
OA.6 Document Control Document control systems should provide correct, readily accessible infor-mation to support station requirements.
OA.7 On-site Nuclear Safety Review Cotnmittee Review of station nuclear activities by a knowledgeable interdisciplinary group should ensure achievement of a high degree of nuclear safety.
6 w -- -.-
,- e.,-,,r , - - . - - - ----_. r e-,-. y y . , - --. , .y .-
, i t
SURRY (1982)
APPENDIX 11 Page 2 l
OPERATIONS OP.1 Operations Organization and Administration The operations organization and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of department activities.
OP.2 Conduct of Operations .
Operational activities should be conducted in a manner that achieves safe and reliable plant operation.
OP.3 Plant Status Controls Operational personnel should be cognizant of the status of plant systems and equipment under their control, and should ensure that systems and equipment are controlled in a manner that supports safe and reliable operation.
OP.4 Operations Knowledge and Performance Operator knowledge and performance should support safe and reliable plant L-operation.
OP.5 Operations Procedures and Documentation Operational procedures and documents should provide appropriate direction and should be effectively used to support safe operation of the plant.
OP.6 Operations Facilities and Eauipment Operational facilities and equipment should effectively support plant operation.
MAINTENANCE MA.1 Maintenance Organization and Administration
' The maintenance organization and administrative systems should ensure effec-tive control and implementation of department activities.
MA.: Plant Material Condition The material condition of the plant should be maintained to support safe and e reliable plant operation.
MA.3 Work Control System The control of work should ensure that identified maintenance actions are I' properly completed in a safe, timely, and efficient manner.
t
i e
,, e SURRY (1982)
APPENDIX 11 Page 3
- l. ,
MA4 Conduct of Maintenance Maintenance should be conducted in a manner that ensures efficient and effective plant operation.
MA.5 Preventive Maintenance The preventive maintenance programs should contribute to optimum perform-anee and reliability of plant equipment. _
MA.6 Maintenance Procedures and Documentation Maintenance procedures should provide appropriate directions for work and should be used to ensure that maintenance is performed safely and efficiently.
MA.7 Maintenance History The maintenance history should be used to support maintenance activities and optimize equipment performance.
MA.8 Maintenance Facilities and Equipment Facilities and equipment should effectively support the performance of mainte-nance activities.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT TS.1 Technical Support Organization and Administration The technical support organization and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of department activities.
TS.2 Surveillance Testing Program Surveillance inspection and testing activities should provide assurance that equipment important to safe and reliable plant operation will perform wit 1in required limits.
TS.3 Operations Experience Review Program Industrywide and in-house operating experiences should be evaluated and appro-priate actions undertaken to improve plant safety and reliability.
TS.4 Plant Modifications Plant modification programs should ensure proper review, control, implementa-tion, and completion of plant design changes in a safe and timely manner.
i
\
- s l SURRY (1982)
APPENDIX II Page 4 TS.5 Reactor Engineering On-site reactor engineering activities should ensure optimum nuclear reactor operation without compromising design or safety limits.
TS.6 Plant Efficienev and Reliability Monitoring Performance monitoring activities should optimize plant thermal performance and reliability.
TS.7 Technical Support Procedures and Documentation Technicel support procedures and documents should provide appropriate direc-tion and should be effectively used to support safe operation of the plant.
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION TQ.1 Training Organization and Administration The training organization and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of training activities.
TQ.2 Non-Licensed Operator Training and Qualification The non-licensed operator training and qualification program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.3 Licensed Operator Training and Qualification The licenstd operator training and qualification program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.4 Shift Technical Advisor Training and Qualification The shift technical advisor training program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.5 Maintenance Personnel Training and Qualification The maintenance personnel training and qualification program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.6 Technical Training for Managers and Engineers The technical training program for engineers and managers should broaden overall knowledge of plant processes and equipment as a supplement to position-specific education and training.
E; . ,
e-c ,
t SURRY (1982)
APPENDIX 11 Page 5 TQ.7 General Employee Training The general employee training program should develop a broad understanding of employee responsibilities and safe work practices.
TQ.8 Training Facilities and Equipment The training facilities, equipment, and materials should effectively support training activities. .
RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION RP.1 Radiological Protection Organization and Administration The organization and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of the radiological protection program.
RP.2 Radiological Protection Personnel Qualification The radiological protection qualification program should ensure that radiolog-leal protection personnel have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to effectively implement radiological protection practices.
RP.3 General Employee Training In Radiological Protection General employee training should ensure that plant personnel, contractors, and visitors have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to effectively implement radioiogical protection practices associated with their work.
RP.4 External Radiation Exposure External radiation exposure controls should minimize personnel radiation ex-posure.
RP.5 Internal Radiation Exposure Internal radiation exposure controls should minimize internal exposures.
RP.6 Radioactive Effluents Radioactive effluent controls should minimize radioactive materials released to the environment.
RP.7 Solid Radioactive Waste Solid radioactive waste controls should minimize the volume of radioactive
' waste and ensure safe transportation of radioactive material.
4 0
- , , - . - - , . , . , , , - . , --,.,----,-----m
,- - - - - ,. , - - . , - . . -,- , - , . _ - - , . - - - - ,,,_.---,-,,,,,,__n.--,.,,---,,--n,-_, -
e,-,,-,_.--,..,.-.-- . ., , - -,.v-.,----- ,w
i a
SURRY (1982)
APPENDIX II Page 6 RP.8 Personnel Dosimetry The personnel dosimetry program should ensure that radiation exposures are accurately determined and recorded.
RP.9 Radioactive Contamination Control Radioactive contamination controls should minimize the contamination of areas, equipment, and personnel. _
CHEMISTRY CY.1 Chemistry Organization and Administration The organization and administrative systems should ensure effective imple-mentation and control of the chemistry program.
CY.2 Chemistry Personnel Qualification The chemistry qualification program should ensure that chemistry personnel have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to implement chemistry practices effectively.
CY.3 Chemistry Control Chemistry controls should ensure optimum chemistry conditions during all phases of plant operation.
C Y.4 Laboratory Activities Laboratory and counting room activities should ensure accurate measuring and reporting of chemistry parameters.
CY.5 Chemical and Laboratory Safety Work practices associated with chemistry activities should ensure the safety of personnel.
__