ML20117J469
| ML20117J469 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1982 |
| From: | INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20114F819 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-44 NUDOCS 8505150113 | |
| Download: ML20117J469 (52) | |
Text
. _ . _ . . _ _ _ . .
\
' ~ '
, I
_ i 1982 Evaluation
~
Browns Ferry .
\ luc ear P ant
~~
ennessee Va ey Au: 7oriy a
h j
l O .
O TEN 84 44 PDR i
- -- - ~ - -re,n-,--,~ _w.n_,,. ,,,,,,,-_,.-.,_,,.._,,,,__,_n, _ , . , , , , _ , . - , , , . . , . , _ , _ , _ , , , .
1 -
l . : . .
- t. .
,P '
f EVALUATION 4
Of BROWNS FERRY NUCT,RAR PLANT
. . . i o
' Tennessee VaHey Authority n.
p
,fa ,#
e
- 4
~4
'f & y,
=m g- syy. ,
yy m ix e n - y ,
i - \
~
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
- Page 1 l
SUMMARY
,c - )'
e INTRODUCTION .
.- The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) conducted its second evaluation of Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Browns Ferry Nuclear Plaat during the weeks of May 10 and 17,1982. Browns Ferry consists of three 1098 MWe General Electric boiling water reactor plants. It is locat,ed on the Tennessee River near Huntsville, Alabama. ,
Unit I began commercial operation in 1974, Unit II in 1975, and Unit III in 1977.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE INPO conducted an [wa5uation of site activities to make an overall determination of plant safety, to evaluate management systems and controls, and to identify areas *
. .needmg improvement. Information was assembled from discussions, interviews, obser-vations, and reviews of documentation.
The INPO evaluation team examined station organization and administration, oper-ations, maintenance, technical support, training and qualification, radiological pro-tection, and chemistry. The team also observed the actual performance of selected evolutions and surveillance testing. Corporate activities were not inclu N in the scope of the evaluation, except as an incidental part of. the station evaluatior,. As a basis for the evaluation,INPO used performan'ce objectives and criteria relevant to each of the h, 7.
QL, areas examined; these were applied and evaluated in light of the experience of team members, INPO's observations, and good practices within the industry.
INPO's goal is to assist member utilities in achieving the highest standards of excellence in nuclear plant operation. Th*s recommendations in each area are based on best practices, rather than minimum' acceptable standards or requirements. Accord-ingly, areas where improvements are recommended are not necessarily indicative of unsatisfactory performance. ,
DETRRMTNATION e
q.
v, s
- v. .
. r BROWNS FERRY (1982)
- Page 2 t ,
i e
4 In each of the areas skralisated,INPO has estah11mhed PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES and ,
supporting criteria. All PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES reviewed during the course of - .
this evaluatior, are listed in APPENDIX II. ,
Findings and recommendations are listed under the PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES to which they perthin. Particularly noteworthy conditions that contribute to meeting PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES are identified as Good Practices. Other findings describe conditions that detract from meeting the PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES. It would not be productive to list as Good Practices those things that are commonly done
- properly in the industrf since this would be of no benefit to TVA or to INPO's other .
. ."' JJ member utilities. As a result, most of the findings highlight conditions that need improvement.
The recommendations following each finding are intended to assist the utility in ongoing efforts to improve all aspects of its nuclear programs. In addressmg these findings and recommendations, the utility should, in.nddition to correcting or improving specific conditions, pursue underlying causes a:id issues.
As a part of the second and succeeding, evaluations of each station, the evaluation team will follow up on responses to findings in previous reports. Findings with response actions scheduled for future completion have been carried forward in APPENDIX I to this report. In areas where additional improvements were needed, a new finding that stands on its own merit has been written. "inus, this report stands alone, and reference to previous evaluation reports should not be necessary.
The evaluation stdf appreciates the cooperation received from alllevels of TVA. ,
1
-Ng l
y,3, .- , . , - - ..... ~
,mm._ . , _ . . _ - , , . _ . . . _ _ _ . _ _
- . - - =
a-aq. m,.. -
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
. Page 3 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY n, ,
Response Summary
(.
In general TVA concurs with the findmgs listed .herein. Detailed responses to each
. finding have been prepared and corrective actions are underway. Dates for completing corrective actions have been provided where necessary.
Many of these findings had previously been identified internally, including all six areas h
~
cited as most important by INPO, and TVA has been pursumg corrective actions on ;
these items within the limits of manpower and budget. In some areas such as findmgs OA.3-1, OP.1-3, MA.3-1, MA.4-1, MA.6-1, MA.7-1, TS.4-2, TS.5-1, and others, problems were being addressed through implementation of our eight-point improvement plan. In these cases, TVA believes present pol.cles will prevent recurrmg problems and no '
further changes are corttemplated.
f.G{.g ,
We have been and will continue to emphasize improvement in these areas.
DS? We appreciate and are rightfully proud of those " Good Practices" noted. As we see these as are.1s where we can exceed INPO Performance Objectives, TVA plans to continue with these programs and include, where appropriate, the philosophy which developed the good practices in other areel.
O 1
ene ,
4
A44' .,
/ . g
.[
' BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 4
- ORGANIZATION AND ADRENESTRATION i
,.-::+ - l t
MANAGEMENT ASSESSMEh"r AND QUAIJTY PROGR AMS 1
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Management should assess station activities to ensure and enhance quality performance of all aspects of nuclear plant operation. !
i' Finding i 1 -
(OA.3-1) i O
4 Recommendation ,
j.
1 5
I-*
pu (Q#
9 de Finding (OA.3-2)
Recommendation Ts,
.. z.,
.t
,g I
e e
. .w.- e v wy-wa p-.w. r-w --e-w w e.-2%--- s---,- we e w- - w,-w y -y e # .----,,-- y.-w..---.-----7-um..----w--e--w-e.* -
. e., .~
y-..
sil i , l
BROWNS FERRY (1982) l Page 5 1 l
. i
+
/ ~ ,
e s
O i
. (OA.3-3) I t
4
- de '
Recommendation ,
f r~y ~
I: . 'a
%;s0 (OA.3-4)
Recommendation pc.s .....;
.,cDS
- --4 .*--.ew,.
y -
- - * . BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 6 a
,n.
e t
INDUSTRIAL SAFETY P5EFORMANCE OBJECTNE: Station industrial safety programs should cabiwe a high '
degree of personnel safety. .
s Finding (OA.5-1) .
8 (OA.5-2)
Recommendation
Response
f L
e
~ +m e.
l-- r
, . . BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Pag 3 7
, a t OPERATIONS :
(
OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION i PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The operations orgamzation and administrative systems ,.
should ensure effective control and implementation of department activities. l Finding I (OP.1-1)
~
i 4
6 g ,, a
- a (OP.1-2) e Finding (OP.1-3)
Recommendation
Response
8
+
s s, e .e w.w
- - . . - - , - , . - - - * -y.. . -- -r- - _. - g - .w4 g .o y y ,,._w ... 7----,- -. - .,. - - . , , , - . - _ - - , --
2 -
,- BROWNS FERRY (1982) ,
, Page 8 CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS ;
/
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational activities should be conducted in a manner that achieves safe and rellahl* plant operation.
. Finding +
(OP.2-1) t l
Recommendation l
Response
V-%.: - -
= .
PIANTETITUS CONTROLS PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational personnel should be cognizant of the status of plant systems and equipment under their control, and should ensure that systems and equipment are controlled in a manner that supports safe and reliable operation.
Finding (OP.3-1)
Recommendation 7 q'y.l
-- . ; .v- .r.-
S- - T-f a r 'l.',
1
. BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 9
, I
/
f h
l
-~ ~ e i
Response
l 4
0
- 8e
- 3 e
p- ,&
,6
- . ,g i g e
e
- W A'
,-?' / ,
. e . .. ( e
'.s.,'s 5
e
i
., . , BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 10 t.,
. ~. , .
Finding !
(OP.3-2) '
/
i, ;
Recommendation
. i 6
O -'
t-e I
8 de ' b e
sinding -
(OP.3-3)
Recommendation (z .
Response
(. ,
e t
Finding (OP.3-4)
,.ff y"; .: ,
.r ;,
-- . - _ e-
m i
l 1
.- . BROWNS FERRY (1982)
-~'
l Page 11 3 e _
- _ . . . . . . . _ 8 i I
m 4
e h
, Response &
(
i-f.
i' t
4
- pe
- Finding (OP.3-5) .
Recommendation
- I Q,'
Response
6 4
.A
'e Gi'$;
f ve9 4 _
v -
. . BROWNS FERRY (1982)
. Page 12 {-
~
p OPERATIONS PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION I; I-
^ PERPORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational procedures and documents should provide !
appropriate direction and should be effectively used to agprt safe operation of the -
plant. . _ . _ _
3
- I Finding (OP.5-1)
F l li[
Recommendation
. -i.
W== pane. i-i
-, OPERATIONS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT s
- t
?;t*>, -
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational facilities and equipment should effectively eet plant operation.
Findinqr (OP.6-1)
Recommendation
. Response e
-r ,
S t.
- e
--m a
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 13 MAINTENANCE ;.
WORK CONTROL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The control of work should ensure that identified maintenance actions are properly completed in a safe, timely, and efficient manner.
a . _ . _ _ _
Findmg (MA.3-1) ,I t
I
{
Recommendation o
/
.(T'. '-
SdN i
Response
i
.i.9:,i
- "~
. . , BROWNS PERRY (1982)
Page 14 CONDUCT OP hAINTENANCE !
^ i
~
, PERPORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Maintenance should be conducted in a manner that ensures effielent and effectiveDiant. operation.
l l Pinding I .
(MA.4-1)
I i
, Recommendation Respons. . ..
jl l
l l
s'3 . . <
MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION PERPORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Maintenanas procedures should provide appropriate di-rections for woric and should be used to ensure that maintenance is performed safely and efficiently. ,' -
Finding (MA.6-1) e Recommendation l
4
,n ,
- 3,w - k.
Nd *p'
_, -. SP W-
c+. , ,
a
..' . BROWNS FERRY (1982) e -
Page'15 }
- Response i
,o .
i i I s
{
f l
4
, . I l- l r
MAINTENANCE HISTORY ,
1 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The maintenance history should be used to support maintenance activities and optimize equipment performance.
Findhg (MA.7-1)
G?.1 D ,i Recommendation
Response
- s
'l-
n ,
- - ,;w. p;,
n, '., . . , .. ,g,,,.,
(. .
. , e BROWNS FERRY (1982)
, Page 16 ;
TECHNICAL SUPPORT i
~
- n. ,
O OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PROGRAM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Industrywide and in-house operating experiences should be evaluated and appropriate actions undertaken to improve plant safety and reliability.
r Fmding *
}-
(TS.3-1) ?
. i f
6 0 gg f
r 0
9 O
Recommendation
Response
(7.
'.,f*
- ', 7 . :. .
BROW 1!S FERRY (1982) 'j
, _ ' _ . _ . _ _ . . _Page 17 l, f
. . - (TS.3-2) ?'
Recommendation l
. n ag-- [.
f
. t
.. i J.
Finding (TS.3-3)
Recommendation -
f.'; .
~-
i' t
+
(TS.3-4) -
Recommendation r%
.h l 1
i l
j
, .,. - ? . : r =w -,. , .g. g :;- -
s .- ,. ,
~
.?: . ~ , . , .- -
9:9gyyli:l-
- 9 i.o ,;,;;
- 3e
- ** - BROWNS FERRY (1982) ,
= Page 18 __{
E, n 9-- ,
N I
't l 1
6 i:
- f.
i
. i v
I i.
PLANT MODIFICATIONS PERFO'JMANCE OBJECTIVE: Plant modification programs should ensure proper re-visw, control, implementation, and completion of plant design changes in a safe and timely manner.
Finding f (TS.4-1)
L Ya ~
4 Finding (Ts.4-2) 9 Recommendation gv
-- ~ _~- BROWNS FERRY (1982)
~_. __ . p ,,,13 i
e
- Response ,
}
t a 1 (m
i 1
4 1
i 9
- o.-
s REACTOR ENGINEERING t
- PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: On-site reactor engmeermg activities should ensure #
optimum nuclear reactor operation without compromismg design or safety limits.
6 .
vF,x (TSd-1)
Recom:nmxlation ,
Response
L M.I kh e $ *9 e,
., mj ,}
' i
! ** BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Pago 20 ,i PLANT EFFICIENCY AND RET.IARILITY MONITORING
,A ~
I PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Performance monitormg activities should optimize plant l thermal performance and reliability._
. Finding g (TS.6-1) t e
e
- g es.
e Finding (TS.6-2) meg- Recommendation lL W
(
e a_
?.? " ' l
-. r q.r --- -- --- - --- -
1, , .. .; .. .
- BROWNS FERRY (1982)
.. Page 21 ;
- , j TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION !
i p
! ~
TRAINING ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The training organization and administrative systems ,
should ensure effective conttul and implementation of training activities.
Finding _
(TQ.1-1) j.
Recommendation .
Response
N Y;bh
\*# Finding (TQ.1-2)
Recommendation i
f~u .
Y7
~ - - - -- _-,,----e,-
W *v --
-3 X. -
- BROWNS FERRY (1982)
- Page 22 .
t LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION
(
\ PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The licensed operator traming and qualification program '
should develop and improve the , knowledge and skills ne.eessary to perform ' assigned job functions.
Finding I (TQ.3-1) l t
O Recommendation
Response
9 a# ,'
(TQ.3-2)
(s;,,.
Recommendation O
Response
qg
..t.'.
', Y
, eee
- -.m .
..,,y yv-._ r - y 7 -- -- p , -,- - ,e e,-,-- _ g -- --,,- - _ g - ,
t-t_ ,
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 23 .
- a s-SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION -
- m. .
! PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The shift technical advisor training program should !
develop and improve the knowledge and skills to perform assigned job functions.
.. Finding ;
(TQ.4-1)
I' l
l' Finding (TQ.4-2)
Recommendation f:X. Response
$Y MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The maintenance personnel training and qualification program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform asagned job functions.
(
Finding (TQ.5-1)
Recommendation eff .
4 pytow
xyc .. - .
- +: _
- . .a +
, ; - n BROWNS FERRY (1982)
.. Page 24 g g
i F-P
?
I' r
o
,e .
V:
%9 Finding)
(TQ.5-2 TECHNICAL TRAINING FOR MANAGERS AND ENGINEERS PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The technical training program for engineers and man-agers should broaden overall knowledge of plant processes and equipment as a supplement to position-specific education and training.
Findmg ,
(TQ.6-1)
C k.b
,+- - -,
e a, y g w wy? -- - - r--mr,-t , - ---
J BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 25_ _ il Recommendation ti
, i
~~ %. i Response l L
GENRRAT EMPLOYEE TRAINING PERFORMANCE OBJECbVE: The general employee training program should develop a le i broad unde.% of aniployee responsibilities and safe work pMe h
Finding (TQ.7-1)
Recommendation f
fos.
A w.>- ,
b'pORSE s'%
!.7 .
Finding-(TQ.7-2) 0 +/
G e
,, -o s m e-m w He -
^
~~
=* '
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
.. Page 26 ,
- d RADIOLOGCAL PROTECTION .
{ x. '
i RADIOLOGCAL PROTECTION ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The organization and administrative systems should armee effective control and implauentation of the radiological protection program. j i
Finding !
(RP.1-1) i O
.I
- ee
- e_
e e
<2 Recommendation (g,v t
.o..)
l .
4 y-g' 9 9
--=. % ...w.-%.
' G!- e ,
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 27 i-t-
r ~:s i i' [
i i
1 e
I
- i L
[
""T""* ,
[_
i~
E1.TERNAL RADIATION EXPOSURE PERFO_R_MANCE OBJECTIVE: External radiation exposure controls should' mirdmize personnel radiation exposure.
~
(RP.4-1) e Recommendation o
h
Response
Ph
, ,:w
'?s? (- i i
- - . - . , - . , - , _ y,,.,y , m.- -- --, - ee- m-- - -.m . . ,mm -- e
- s. .
~
~
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
' Pago 28 INTERNAL RADIATION EXPOSURE s ~. '
',- PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Internal radiation exposure controls should minimize
- internal exposures. _
3 >
l Finding (R,P.5-1) ;
Recommendation Respo.nse
(, ,
s
'Q$
RADIOACTI E EFFLUENTS PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Radio' active affinant controls should ' minimize radio-active materials released to the environment. .
Finding (RP.6-1)
Recommendation
.if 4
---m ..
~
~~ '
.- ~
- ; BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 29 p . _ _ _ . v- i
' 4 Response .
f-P
, t SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE l PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Solid radioactive waste controls should minimize the j volume of radioactive wasta and ensure safe G@ tion of radioactive matenal.
h Finding (RP.7-1)
Recommendation
Response
t
. CI'k 4
~~ '
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
- Paga 30 PERSONNEL DOSIMETRY
(.
i PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The personnel dosimetry program should ensure the'.
radiation vim are accurately determined and recorded. -
, Finding ,
(RP.8-1) :
?
Recommendation r
Response
I f, *
(g. L -
RADIOACTIVE CONTAMTMATION CONTROL -
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Radiodetive contamination controls should minimize the.
contammation of areas, equipment, and pma uiel.
Finding
_ (RP.9-1)
Recommendation l
flh \
Q: l l
l
m - e. /
2 .
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 31 f
, Response O
O 4
- 4 g-
- a.-
t
- 5 f-N .J.. ' ,
- 6 a
f, '. *
- Y 'sAh
u.: .
. BROWNS FERRY (1982)
PagG 32 i CHEMISTRY ,
r%
s CHEMISTRY ORGANIZATION AND ADMDilSTRATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The organization and administrative systems should ensure effective implementation and control of the chemistry program. ,
i Finding l (CY.1-1) l t
g g a Recommendation
(-.'jFe CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL QUAIMICATION PERFORM ANCE OBJECTIVE: The chemistry qualification program should ensure that chemistry personnel have the knowledge eM practical abilities necessary to implement chemistry practices effectively.
l
. Finding (CY.2-1) e.
Yli,b ,
6 s a
p ym we ,, y.we --- --,- e--wy--- m -g e -------.y -y-y-me w- -- -----;-----..ew--- w-..--.- - - --,--------.----w--- , - ,- rv-- ;---wye r m'-
- BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 33 I(-~. '
Recommendation l
i P
i
+
f 1
Response
(-
h CHEIETRY CONTROL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Chemistry controls should ensure optimum chemistry conditions during all phases of plant operation. <
P Pinding (CY.3-1)
Recommendation b
...m.-
me , ;
2
- r - - -
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
Page 34 .
. i.
Response ;
(. t
\
- t o
f f
f I
e a
9 4 k a . . .
h Pinding (CY.3-2)
?- ?,; Recommendation p
1 S h g 1-%,g
- sL. f
_' Jb'
.-~ -..
y , - . . - - . .- ----w. _ ,--e t ,- ,, - - -
~ - -
_ y ;.,- - ,
-* BROWNS FERRY (1982)
,. Pago 35 LABORATORY ACTIVITIES ,
i
[ PERFORhaANCE OBJECTIVE: Laboratory and counting room activities should ensure ij
- 1. , accurate measuring and reporting of chemistry parameters. ;
1
,J
, Finding (CY.4-1) -
).
i.
I i
Recommendation , ..
z.
n d
Response , ,
FA'.
o e
j t
e
- e. , 9 4
, , . . ,--.w---,v-- - - -. . - . . s.--. ,. c.. . . - --- . . - - ~ - , , - - - - - - . - _ . , - - - - - --
-e-
,7. m.
, 3 mm ;;;.
.- 3
.. j ;-- <
~
' BROWNS FERRY (1982) g.
APPENDUC I
- ,- Page 1 APPENDIXI l
(:.
E Summarv of Outstanding Resoonse Action from Previous Evaluation (1981)
, ORGANE:ATION STRUCTURE I GNPO Procedure OA-102, Revision 2)
L, FLQ(Criteri.a._B__and C) _
_ i f
(
. .. . . . ~ - - -
~ ~
..-.--s Y
(
~ "
Recommendation -
Response
t
,,e..
,.4- '
6' Status . _ _ _ . - . _ .
LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-244, Revision 2)
Finding-(Criterion G) .. . . . . . .. . ..
e n.N =
- e o H e-4 Recommendation 5 h i%,'- ,
d.j ,7
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
- APPENDC[I Page 2
,-3 Easponse
_ . , _ . - . ._.n--. -n- -.-e - - . -- - - - - - ------ - - - - ~ ~ - ~ ~
s _
t
. ~ . . . _ . . .
kr 9
t MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION AND ADMDUSTRATION * *
(INPO Prochdure MA-401, Revision 2)
Finding (Criterion B)
.* ee,o _ ..
"4 6
~
^
Recommendation _
e ,- . . -.mmm.w wem- +--..
w &
Stanas e
e
- q.
.-m.
. , . . -. - z,r .
i :-- l BROWNS FERRY (1982) ;
~
APPENDIX I , j
. , Page 3 -1
-. WORK CONTROL SYSTEM $
(INPO Procedure MA-404, Revision 1) ,
Finding (Criterion 3) --
f
(
O 9-O d h
Recommendation ~
4 g; E = 9anse _
Status G>
- BROWNS FERRY (1982)
APPENDIX I l
. , Page 4 '!
MAINTENANCE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 'l (INPO Procedure MA-408, Revision 1) ;j
(' 'l Finding (Criteria B and C).-
~ **
-. . - , -m. .
- . ~ . . m., .
g i
i +
1 l
-..+
, .. - .. . . . . i
Response
fjf Status ALARA PROGRAM (INPO Procedure RC-502, Revision 1)
- 1. Findmg (Criterion D-ALARA Goals) _ _ , , ,
Recommendation . .
g e
b =4 "
O M e
- N#A:
.. - . . y_- , ., , -- --, - , . --v v --e
c_ - . -
.~ ,
- BROWNS FERRY (1982)
APPENDIX 1 ,
- , Page 5 l Response _
/ f.
(
.i Status _._
i l
_t
- 2. Findmg (Criterion E-Scope of ALARA Program)_ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _
Recommandation . _ _. _____._._i _ _ _ _ _.. _ _. _ .__
Response s
- 7. _
Status _ . .
gjf RADIOLOGCAL SURVEY EQUIPMENT [ONTROL AND CALIBRATION '
GNPO Procedure RC-506, Re' vision 2) .
Finding (General Criterion-Cadbratiori and Check Methods) 4 J
s ee
,- , ~ ,r , , , - , - - - , . . - , - - - - - - , , - - , . . . . , . - _ .. - .m
n ,. . . . _ _ .
' ' ' ~. y , - ?', .g
- a
._ r __
f
.' BROWNS FERRY (1982)
. APPENDIX I :
4 Page 6 !
sF
[ *.
,- - {j e
4 0
5 l
ji
- . s ,
O 0
f.
t r
a 4
9 Y '
Recommendation 6
D I
L
.D %.'
' *u.2/ -
- e 9
w
=_ r-, -_ m I
& 0
- e
- BROWNS FERRY (1982) .
APPENDIX I [.
- Page 7 a^
s a
,I l
l i
1 4 V
?*
Response
9 m.-
Status i
h
~
.-j;f. ' *
. - c. .
I* ,[
=%,
r- -
, , _ . -- - - = - -. .
d 4n 1
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
> APPENDIX I
- Page 8 HEALTH PHYSICS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT .
(INPO Procedure RC-509, Revision 2) -- {
t
_ . - - [
- 2. Finding '
e [L f
t, u .
. i,
. 'l i l-t-
i u'
- } ,..
I
- 'j .
i Recommendation i
I i I b' l f~I f
Ij
.-s -t
.tk2?[N[
l S
e
Response
l l
Status r
'A p,y.g,1
'y* 'I; e
9
- ~-
-- - -e.,-- V^MM, , , . . .-
_ 'f 6;i. :k[ '
'.'f-6.
d f
'r - ~ - ~ ~ ;-;; . ;-' - - , , . . , ,
w i a y ,
f n o ; *
- , * ' ?. -
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
I-
' APPENDIX I .
. . . - . _ . . - . s.
Page.9 . .
I
- g . .
1 a, .
I' s .t-r^
i k
i
!,~
I l
L <.
l
- t.
j - . j.
3 i
f e
1
- o.- r
( t-: l I
i l
l g #
L i
h-I
- 4 O ^
. O f .
t i
O -
V e
G -
y
' ~ -
-l j
- BROWNS FERRY (1982) 'l
!l APPENDIX II l Page1
}
s
( APPENDIX H f
.l l
Performance Objectives Reviewed l
- lj ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION , [
'1 tu OA.1 Station Organization and Administration 'I
. Station organization and administrative systems should ensure effective imple-
!l
- 1 mentation and control of station activities. l i
OA.2 Mission. Goals..and Objectives ',
i' Station mission, goals, and objectives should be established and progress.
monitored through a formal program.
~
OA.3 Management Assessment and Quality Programs Management sh'ould assess station activities to ensure and enhance quality performance of all aspects of nuclear plant operation. l OA.4 Personnel Planmng and Qualification
- x, Personnel programs should ensure that station positions are filled by individuals with proper job qualifications.
1 OA.5 Industrial Safetv i l
Station industrial safety pr@ains should achieve a high degree of personnel j safety. l OA.6 Document Control '
1 Document control systems should provide correct, readily accessible infor- l mation to support station requirements.
l OPERATIONS l
OP.1 Ooerations Organization and Administration The operations orgamzation and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of department activities.
OP.2 Conduct o'f Ooerations ,
1 1
- . Operational activities should be conducted in a manner that achieves safe and reliable plant operation.
l l
. . .. n .
~
.g . y -,;, z - - - '-
Yh*Rf , - # , - .
H
- C ' } h y .{ ' 9 ~~ ' " ;,; ' #
N BROWNS FERRY (1982)
APPENDIX II
- Page 2 j.
t t-e ..
' OP.3 Plant Status Controls ,
i
(
V Operational personnel should be cogmzant of the status of plant systems and equipment under their control, and should ensure that systems and equipment are controlled in a manner that supports safe and reliable operatiom OP.4 Ooerations Knowledge and Performance i
+
I Operator knowledge and performance should support safe and reliable plant j
- operation.
OP.5 Ooerations Procedures and Documentation .
Operational procedures and documents should provide appropriate direction and !
^
- should be effectively used to support safe operation of the plant.
OP.6 Ooerations Facilities and Eouipt:a.nt ,
Operational facilities and equipment should effectively support plant operation.
MAIhTENANCE MA.1 Maintenance Organization and Administration
~4 4 The maintenance organization and administrative systems should ensure effee-tive control and implementation of department activities.
MA.2 Plant Material Cendition The material condition of the p$mt should be maintained to support safe and reliable plant operation. ,
MA.3 Work Control Svstem .
The control of work should ensure that identified maintenance actions are properly completed in a safe, timely, and efficient manner.
MA.4 Conduct of Maintenance Maintenance should be conducted in a manner that ensures efficient and effective plant operation.
MA.5 Preventive Maintenance The preventive maintenance programs should contribute to optimum perform-ance and reliability of plant equipment.
?,IA.6 Maintenance Procedures and Documentation S.jl ~ Maintenance proce' d ures should provide appropriate directions for work and 4 should be used to ensure that maintenance is performed Jafely and efficiently.
4 a
pipg., _
.-w-, ,
,'m- ~ ~' '- - , .- - - - , - - . - .
v- -
^
} ;. ,
- - ~,-
- " ';;, . W
~
~
BROWNS FERRY (1982) ,
APPENDIX II F
~
Page 3 l M .7 Maintenance Historv
(
The maintenance history should be used to support maintenance activities and optimize equipment performance.
MA.8 Maintenance Facilities and Eauioment i
Facilities and equipment should effectively support the performance of mainte-nance activities. ,
. {
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
. t TS.1 Technical Support Organkation and Administration [
The technical support orgamzation and administrative systems should ensure.
effective control and implementation of department activities.
TS.2 Surveillance Testing Program Surveillance inspection and testing activities should provide assurance that equipment important to safe and reliable plant operation will perform within required limits.
TS.3 - Ooerations Exoerience Review Program
,g .y
- Ss Industrywide and in-house operating experiences should be evaluated and appro-v.F priate actions undertaken to improve plant safety and reliability.
TS.4 Plant Modifications , _
Plant modification programs should ensure proper review, control, implementa- <
tion, and completion of plant dpsign changes in a safe and timely manner.
TS.5 Reactor Engineering On-site reactor engineering activities should ensure optimum nuclear reactor operation without compromising design or safety limits.
TS.6 Plant Efficienev and Reliability Monitoring Performance monitoring activities should optimize plant thermal performance and reliability.
TS.7 Technical Sucoort Procedures and Documentation Technical support procedures and documents should provide appropriate direc-tion and should be effectively used to supprt safe operation of the plant.
,q,.;m ,
v -
.y
,p.t BROWNS FERRY (1982) ,
- , APPENDIX II (l Page 4 it t i h
C TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION l t '
TQ.1 Training Organization and Administration ,
?
The training organization and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of training activities. j:
i TQ.2 Non-Licensed Ooerator Training and Qualification The non-11 censed operator trauung and quali.fication program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.3 Licensed Operator Trandne and Qualification f The licensed operator training and qualification program should develop and y improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.4 . Shift Technical Advisor Training and Qualification The shift technical advisor training program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.5 Maintenance Personnel Training and Qualification The maintenance personnel training and qualification program should develop T;
OW and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions. -
TQ.6 Technical Training for Managers and Engineers i
The technical training program *for engineers and managers should broaden -
overall knowledge of plant processes and equipment as a supplement to position-specific education andstraining. ,
TQ.7 General Emplovee Training The general employee training program should develop a broad understanding of employee responsibilities and safe work practices.
TQ.8 Training Facilities and Eauipment t.
l The trauung facilities, equipment, and materials should effectively support l training activities.
RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION RP.1 Radiological Protection Organization and Administration ww.
i%C i
W;9 g# The organization and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implemantation of the radiological protection program.
+ , - _ . - . - s- _ _ .g. ,, --
3 .. _
1 . . ..
2 a' ,
g ,e
- - - ~
- ll:
BROWNS FERRY (1982)
- APPENDIX H r
- Page 5 RP.2 Radiological Protection Personnel Qualification .
t '
i The radiological protection qualification program should ensure that radiolog-
- ical protection personnel have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to effectively implement radiological protection practices.
- t RP.3 ' General Emoloyee Training In Radiological Protection ;
f General employee training should ensure that plant personnel, contractors, and i
- visitors have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to effectively ;
implement radiological protection practices associated with their work. .
RP.4 External Radiation Exposure External radiation exposure controls should minimize personnel radiation ex- .
Posure. ,,
RP.5 Internal Radiation Exposure Internal radiation exposure controls should minimize internal exposures.
RP.6 Radioactive Effluents Radioactive effluent controls should minimize radioactive materials released to ,
the environment.
RP.7 Solid Radioactive Waste '
Solid radioactive . waste controls should minimize the volume of radioactive waste and ensure safe transportation of radioactive material.
RP.8 Personnel Dosimetry
[* .
The personnel dosimetry program should ensure that radiation exposures are accurately determined and recorded.
RP.9 Radioactive Contamination Control I
. Radioactive contamination controls should minimize the contamination of j areas, equipment, and persoimel.
1 I
CHEMISTRY l
1 CY.1 Chemistry Organization and Administration The organization and administrative systems should ensure effective imple-mentation and control of the chemistry program.
+g vy
-eo-
,,r---,- - .w.,.-.<-b---, - gm - , - , - .. - - .
. - ::-- . . . - , . . - . ~ -
2 - - -
,i g..
3._ .:s,4,,
- , . BROWNS FERRY (1982)
APPENDIX II i-Page 6 l l
CY.2 Chemistrv Personnel Qualification }
(
\ The chemistry qualification program should ensure that chemistry personnel have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to implement chemistry practices effectively.
CY.3 Chemistrv Control i Chemistry controls should ensure optimum chemistry conditions durmg all phases of plant operation. ;
. CY.4 Laboratorv Activities ,
Laboratory and counting room activities should ensure accurate measuring and !
reporting of. chemistry parameters. l Chemical and Laboratorv Safetv CY.5 _ .
Work practices associated with chemistry activities should ensure the safety of personnel.
6
- t y 6 .
m k
t I
e l '.
l l
l l
, +649 m.=,..c..=..--..,,
_.- pe mp. . dat e _ _ _
e.R Me NN
'"t h J AII.W.F h I..M Sm-- W.r NN E.t4N W,.dP.
f AuW4sk
$PS le M hM Tlusm f%.mmNep.
p m.t r.P _ _ _ _ _
I W Sf T.B IGW9.GdBS h ^ ~ ~
tWG.0 . I
_ e W W 9..E.EE me s t.m Wh.e t PelW4 M SS __MSNEgbM
- s4
- - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - _ _ , - - - - 4 er .x- u h y -e. - - - - - -