ML20117J639
| ML20117J639 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1982 |
| From: | INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20114F819 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-44 NUDOCS 8505150163 | |
| Download: ML20117J639 (53) | |
Text
.
L .E 3
=-- ,. - --- - --
.a .- m r___
L i 1982 Evaluation i
D.C. Cook
~
L Luc. ear P ant r
.nClana & V.ICllC an ~
- ec:ric Comoany l
I i
d
[i go
/
c% bo* -
r w.t' i
t
- + :;;=.,. c " qmi. =: M .:' -y. -: ~ - : ., - . '-
- r. ,.a . f Eg.h W. .51s 2.; ? r~ :..+:.*L Q '? ; a Y.;.; 3 &
- 2.. ..:? W.y.1 %%
~-+ % 5 M @d~."Tsifi~h n 2 % -
[, %;a v.JW yM M w
.,..w.s.~ n.N.
w.ws4t+"$.%F$. &s. . -:- - .4-.s ..re, ~-
m . ..uut
- -n.,a,..fen. M.re,.e:.hM>tg.95.a.%?#'ffAMNMfEMD'i@%m
.a L 5%ddg p-.
f f h v.i B 6 .
.f.M, '
nj .'. .~.h.
55KW~.R ~
iT7.E'$'KOE$fTyRW83A % M 60.i.TIG M*E d i;.i C MC8 5 & 4.'. U f.f N . s r 3 -
E .M5%er
{'T@k-r :*..ng?t;f)+eledsgg%%ec R.ef
.p;:;ssve%..W+..;A.cu.n.r.: .- .: w. . .d.
-. a * - -%70.-n
- e; .. c.4..-
..,..-,.ww.i '+..,p-e y %.n.g~+.c .
v .. .? c.W i, .,
.[d.4.~.k. &s5'#
l %QQ,7:c .;. .
- :. ::..~.t fs u. w. $..[R::;p.. ..$q &$$.)hT,3
.;R.(:_f. ~
?<:.k ciW~,-~fs.%::c
. e,- : ,
'.: .;'.W.
..,9.
~
- . . 3 _:. . :?. ..Y'[;-)r E . E .
a...g.T~..W .
-b .N
~ .
' .;a.,.,. F * '.'.J 3 sr I L , */
WWidai?#M"h?.kf;cf.c W,,, $.N*:kD$-
LMWBMMk:a$. h*fy}..', '.-? M.?::'ik;;.
. a .. . . -
.l'?'. .... . ;
m.. . =~ .g~ ~ *N . ~ .'. A 5 Sen.
& %?k n. &r.;.g.e:A..s
& f E U. $. .$${;{
- .v
, .. -c .
e .
? ?~s.- d h.EN8MM$5N$.M L m -
W'??!S.Yf.~
&?&. ew: .,
E .h~fN) i$,bh.%.NIkI,0.n.;
.q J n~.
M '.*
.j.-;.h d k.. h~fSM ~.~.
~r p mn, ...i
.$$ : ~~
N ?.
w.ss w....'
/ ~~$r
...wGS..,-t..
a
.,. gf...g ,
M'hb w'.g %
M. kbe.K..m,c.; Q.'[..1.-. ,Q.
.< .-u
.v.O' .,. n .. #.- .. v.c . . .,g.
. ,c.~. y u e u W.W.n' r '.!
-. Q, .p%fc W:v. M
,. n %. . , -
$. \ W "J'/iO-fi El.TI i IM-),5..:-[w;dkuf..
ti
- y. : .
d '7 b .h>:P.'n.iNIrQ Y w =< ~ ~ ~ - . . #;%, --'
$IY6T m 4'- .%LnMZ.?~Q
,.Q;n*(, k,Wh. k !:'Q.t.
.- < ..~y
.. - . ., ., ..: ,5., a u . . . . ;-. . .:. ., c '
- t. , ?. ; 3.",
. ' - 9.c M'& w , _
jh k:.' ':,,. % u
.m .. . w=. . '
ac = a- n. ' BSO5150163 041121 :lcg. kWfl. .
ar F0IA
.,C;$5:. PDR c ._ . : .v e .
l .- '% . , ,
**-~'-=-ma--.-4_ ,,
t
- r. ..
EVALUATION Of DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Indiana & Michigan Electric Company ee M
i!
6 4
w .
D. C. COOK (1982)
Page1
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
'. l tion of Indiana &
The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) shore conducted of Lake an ev Michigan Electric Company's (I&M) Donald C. Cook Nuclear P t March 15 and March 22,1982. Unit one began Michigan near the city of Benton Harbor,(NET). Michigan. The plant h pressurized water reactors rated at 1054 978. and 1100 Mwe
, commercial operations in August 1975 and unit two in July 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ll determination of l d to identify areas INPO conducted an evaluation of site i activities i terviews, obser- to make plant safety, to evaluate management systems a I
vations, and reviews of documentation. tion, operations, i i The INPO evaluation team examined plant organization and adm maintenance, technical support, training and qualification, f selected evolutions ra and chemistry. The team also observed the actual i Asperformance a basis for the oC surveinance testing. t to each of the areas
, evaluation, except as an incidental part of the l plant evaluat on.
f evcluation,INPO used performance objectives and criteria re evanf the examined; these were applied and evaluated t standards of in lig INPO's goal is to assist member utilities i in i achieving ach area are based i
theonhighe ents. Accord-
- excellence in nuclear plant operation. The recommendati ons di ative n eof best practices, rather than minimum accepta unsatisfactory performance.
DETERMINATION 5
+%-.
,.gi.a
.-...-..-e.--
The following beneficial practices and accomplishments were n .
l
. ee ..- .........
~~--e--
- = = - - .
.-n,-e-e-y---
_ m
_ ,_ _ .e.
' " ' ~ ' -
~~~~~~'~~---
~ _ _ . - - . . . .
om4M -
e mwmmwA mewaveM---
t
+ o- + , ,, ..4,s.m----- , s, n -, , -,-. - , - - - , . , - - - , , , , . - - - - - - , , , . . - . .. -s ,,,.,-e , - - ,.n --n-..
-~
D. C. COOK (1982)
Page 2
~
~ -
~ "
In each of the areas evaluated,INPO has established PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES ar
' supporting criteria.- All PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES reviewed during the course o this evaluation are listed in APPENDIX II. -
Findings and recommendations are listed under the PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE which they pertain. Particularly noteworthy conditions that contribute to meetin Other finding PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES are identified as Oood Practices. .
describe conditions that detract from meeting the PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES.
would not be productive to list as Good Practices those things that are commonly don properly in the industry since this would be of no benefit to Indiana & M
- Company or to INPO's other member utilities.'
highlight conditions that need improvement.
The recommendations following each finding are intended to assist the utility in on efforts to improve all aspects of its nuclear programs. In addressing these findings a
- recommendations the utility should, in addition to correcting or improving specil
- conditions, pursue underlying causes and issues.
i i ,
4
. ?
r i .
e s
.f 4
a..
- T -pr-, e e e, e y w w+- , v. w.----y..--g -- w---%-+,,.g.--,=_y,---a ey , 4ge.----- , - -y--y,ra v, y --mgwe--,,m.sre w + .r-4g- y a,
' D. C. COOK (1982)
Page 3
~ The evaluation staff appreciates the cooperation received from alllivels of
& Michigan Electric Company and American Electric Power Service Corpor i -
i
!. S a
9 i
- ~~
/ g d
-s D. C. COOK (198
{ Page' ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION .
MISSION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Station mission, goals, and objectives should be e::tal
, lished and progress monitored through a formal program. ,
Finding (O A.2-1)
Recommendation Response I MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY PROGRAMS PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Management should assess station activities to ensu:
and enhance quality performance of all aspects of nuclear plant operation.
Finding (OA.3-1)
Recommendation -
(
Response r i
t f
e 9
-.an-- n_-
,y. 7p._ ...-,%. g , - _ _ _ _ _ - , __. ,wv. y , ,,,, y ,- g-,
- ++,,
t D. C. COOK (19:
, Pagt
' e Finding Plant personnel are not always aware of action commitments me (OA.3-2) l by off-site organizations. Examples were noted where the pl.
was not aware of and, therefore, did not implement action comtr ments made by personnel at AEP headquarters. ,
Recommendation Establish a method to ensure that plant management takes app priate action on all applicable commitments.
Response This problem had been identified prior to the INPO evaluation, a concentrated effort had been initiated by the plant to search and make current all items for which the plant has commitme:
The QA Department .naintains appropriate records for plant et mitments and follows up to ensure that required items are dressed on time.
The existing " Computerized Commitment Program" (AE' General Procedure No. 2.2) is used to notify personnel of comi ment assignments and track their closecuts. This is being revie to ascertain where methods can be improved to enhance the or all effectiveness of the program for use both at the plant an the AEPSC Engineering Office. Results of the review are sei uled for implementation by September 1982.
Finding Management and supervisory personnel need to be more involw (OA.3-3) monitoring and assessing important aspects of plant activi Numerous material deficiencies, industrial safety discrepan and procedural problems requiring corrective action had not brought to the attention of management.
Recommendation Managers and supervisors should frequently inspect the plai observe actual operations and plant conditions and to ide deficiencies and out-of-specification conditions. Follow-up tems should be utilized to ensure that corrective action is I pleted for allidentified problems.
Response The program of regular tours and feedback on observations placed in effect June 4,1982. The plant manager recogni:
concomitant necessity to reduce the administrative workload currently exists in order that this new requirement not be fu
- added assignment.
~ ,
en i
M
,y
D. C. COOK (198 Page DOCUMENT CONTROL ,
. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Document control systems should provide correct, rea-ily accessible information to support station requirements. -
Finding (O A.6-1) t t
t Recommendation
Response
-f
- ~ , - - . - -
W-
_. _ .,x g
~
D. C. COOK (198
! Page i
OPERATIONS PLANT STATUS CONTROLS .
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational personnel should be cognI=nt of the stat of plant systems and equipment under their control, and should ensure that systems aa
- equipment are controlled in a manner that supports safe and reliable ope : tion.
Finding ?
(OP.3-1)
Recommendation
Response
Finding !~
(OP.3-2)
Recommendation
Response
. . ~ - . - _ _
m---- - .
f .
- e
. e
' D. C. COOK (19f
-- P age' Pinding) I h (OP.3-3 i,
~
e f t
4 Recommendation
. E
} *.
f^
l-t-
W t
I Finding :
(OP.3-4) !
.o Recommendation l
Response
i h
O 4
.n .-
D.C. COOK; Pi Pinding .
(OP.3-5) i I
- L
' Hecommendation i~
. I-
? -
i~
)
Response ;.
I OPERATIONS PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational procedures and documents should p appropriate direction and should be effectively used to support safe operation plant.
Finding (OP.5-1)
Recommendation
- Response i
i I
l Pinding (OP.5-2) i l
I n
.o m...,
~ _
- i. . . ,
, .- t D. C. COOK (1982) i '
Page 11 -
i.
Recommendation
}
~
l-Response [
t f
OPERATIONS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Operational facilities and equipment should effectively.
support plant operation.
I Finding i (OP.6-1)
Recommendation
Response
f G
..m - , . ,w,___, __ ._. , , _ , , . . _ _ _ , , , , , _ _ . , _ . , ,y_ ... _,
'T ,
t.
o e
%- 1 4
- D. C. COOK (1982 Page 12 s _ 1 Finding (OP.6-2)
O Recommendation i:
9 i
Response ,
Finding (OP.6-3)
Recommendation
Response
e s
9 e
G
_ -_ __.-___________m __
. ~,
t.-
D. C. COOK (1982)
Page 13 t - . _ _ _ .
Finding (OP.6-4) me I
e Recommendation .
s
Response
O h,
G
- - , - ~ -
.~ < . . - -
g.;; ;
, l
~. ,.
)
l '
~
l D. C. COOK (It l Page !
MAINTENANCE 1
PLANT MATERIAL CONDITION , ,
i
- , 1
~
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The material condition of the plant should be m.[
$ tained to support safe and reliahl* plant operation. !
r I Finding (MA.2-1) -
t f
Recommendation
Response
3 WORK CONTROL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The control of work should ensure that identi mainteners actions are properly completed in a safe, timely, and efficient manngr.
Finding (M A.3-1) 9
, Recommendation e
Response .
m,
==
O D. C. COOK (198
~- Page1 t.
8e e I
.i 8
Finding (MA.3-2) !
Recommendation
Response
Finding (M A.3-3) e to
~ _ ,
. . r
.' j.
{.
. D. C. COOK (1982'.
Page 16) i CONDUCT OF MAINTENANCE , [
I PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Maintenance should be conducted in a manner that ensures efficient and effective plant operation. -
}
i' Finding (MA.4-1) i f! '. .
Recommendation !
Response
I Finding (MA.4-2) 4
. Recommendation Response -
I I
F .
- v. .
m i
' i D. C. COOK (1982) j Page 17 j i
i TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION TRAINING ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The training organization and administrative systems !
should ensure effective control and implementation of training activities. __ j
. l~
Finding (TQ.1-1) }.
t Recommendation
Response
LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The licensed operator training and qualification program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
Finding (TQ.3-1)
Recommendation 6
Response
- 7 1
__ :~ - j
> 1 r
i
. D. C. COOK (1982; Page 18; MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The maintenance personnel training and qualificatfor program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perforzr
- assigned job functions.
i Findmg {'
(TQ.5-1) ;
i.
Recommendation
Response
Finding (TQ.5-2)
Recommendation
Response
r.
- ~ _
i, . i D. C. COOK (198:
Page 11 ,
- I GENERAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING i
i
! PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The general employee training program should develop; broad understanding of employee ra=naaeihilities and safe work practices. .
n . .
I Finding I,
, (TQ.7-1) !
t
)
Recommendation }.
\
Response
e 9
s 4
l l
t i - - . - - - . . - _ .,... . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - , _ . _ _ .___ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _
j
.s . . -
< , . l t .
D. C. COOK (1982). I
!i. Page 20 l TECHNICAL SUPPORT TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION '
, PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The technical support crganization and administrative i systems should ensure effective control and implementation of department cetivities. ,
t Finding i (TS.1-1)
Recommendation
Response
OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PROGRAM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Industrywide and in-house operating experiences should be evaluated and approp-inte actions undertaken to improve plant safety and reliability.
Finding (TS.3-1) 9 4
. - . , , , , , , - . . , - - - , - . . , - . - - . - - - - - -.---..r-,. .., -
.n n, -_,, ,, ,
t .
' D. C. COOK (1982)
Page 21 ,
Recommendation
- 9 I
. Response i I
1 Finding (Ts.3-2)
Recommendatior
' Response
- 1. -
D. C. COOK (1982) :
Page 22 ;
PLANT MODIFICATIONS .
Plant modification programs should ensure proper re-PERFORMANCE view, control, OBJECTIVE:
implementation, and completion of plant design cha
- timely manner. j.
4 I
- Finding )
(TS.4-1)
Recommendation
Response
Finding (TS.4-2)
Recommendation
, yy-mywy w - - --
m -y ----
s >- -----,+c -- - -
m ;- - -.
..:. \
~.
.. . l
- t. t
' D. C. COOK (1982)' '
- Page 4 "
INDIANA & MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY Response Summary ,
~
The Indiana & Michigan Electric Company is pleased that INPO found the Donald Cook Nuclear Plant being operated in a safe manner. As a result of the INPO, evaluation, we have become aware of a number of areas that need improvement. We.
appreciate these INPO findings and recommendations for they should help the Cook. -
Nuclear Plant meet the benchmarks of excellence for nuclear power operation. ;
l' 0
5 O
a s
S
Jy .. ,
- r. .
- 3 - . -
~
i i
D. C. COOK (1982)
Page 23 9
1.
l.
. I e
i Response ,
Finding (TS.4-3)
Recommendation
Response
mu D. C. COOR (1988) i Page 24 Y
4 Finding (TS.4-4)
I Recommendation )
t' t
t
Response
PLANT EFFICIENCY AND RELIABILITY ti ize MONITOR plant PERFORM ANCE OBJECTIVE. Pedormance monitoring activitie thermal performance and reliability.
Finding (TS.6-1)
Recommendation
Response
O
- - - . , , - - - , - - - , - - - - .--r- _._- _.,--.----, ------ . , ,,- --- -- - - - - - - e.-- ,a-,----
D. C. COOK (1982) .
Page 25
- RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE
- The organization and administrative items should i ensure effective control and implementation of the radiological protection program. j f
?
Finding (RP.1-1) ,
Recommendation
Response
- 2. _..-_ _ _
D. C. COOK (1982) -
p _
Page 26 I,
b
(
i e
b
7 .
- j. -
- D. C. COOK (1982) '
Page 27 ;
Finding (RP.1-2)
- t
- ?
?
f f
f t
Recommendation
Response
=. ... . - . . . - . . - - . . -
1
. l D. C. COOK (1982) {
_.Pareas - s Finding (RP.1-3) !
~
l t-Recommendation t
[.
s f.
t-
Response
[
I 2
GENERAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING IN RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: General employee training should ensure that plant personnel, contractors, and visitors have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to effectively implement radiological protection practices associated with their work. -
Finding (RP.3-1)
Recommendation
[- -*
j D. C. COOK (1982) !
,, Page 29 :
I
, Response i i
t -
?
t EXTERNAL RADIATION EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: External radiation exposure controls should minimize personnel radiation exposure.
Finding (RP.4-1)
INTERNAL RADIATION EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Internal radiation exposure controls should minimize internal exposures.
Finding (RP.5-1)
Recommendation
Response
V ,
P g_,' '
i , .
e t
D. C. COOK (1!
Page,-
i N
i!
I h
s Finding (RP.5-2)
Recommendation
Response
i e
4 Finding (RP.5-3)
Recommendation t
e
~ - -
t* . .
t.
, D. C. COOK (1982I Page 31, t
~
t s
j* .
r 1-SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Solid radioactive waste controls should minimize the:
volume of radioactive waste and ensure safe ti-W.ation of radioactive material.
Finding.
(RP.7-1) 4 s
Recommendatiot
Response
D
-e e
a f
I e
, . , - . - - - ..,__c. ,_ _ . , ,,, - - -.. , _ , _y, _. ,_,,_,, ,__,._,.,_... _ _ _ , .__,., _ , _ , , . , _ . - - _ _ _ _ , . , . _ _ , _ , . , _ _ , . , , _ , _ - - - - - __
-l . - ..
D. C. COOK (1982)
Page 32 :
~
. PERSONNEL DOSIMETRY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The persor.nel dosimetry program should ensure that radiation exposures are accurately determined and recorded.
j Finding I.
. (RP.8-1) !
t 6
Recommendation -
i' 4
s
Response
RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION CONTROL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Radioact.ive contamination controls should minimize the contamination of areas, equipment, and personnel.
Finding (RP.9-1) 4 Recommendation i
l l
5
- D. C. COOK (1982)'
Page 33' I
e.
- 4 4
s l
0 } l 1
. t-
Response
E e
e G
s e
0 O
h
?
t m
9 9
xx _
D. C. COOK (1982)
{ Page 34 :
CHEMISTRY
, CHEMISTRY ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION !
?
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The organization and administrative systems shouldj ensure effective implementation and control of the chemistry program. ;
I Finding i, (CY.1-1) i Recommendation
Response
Finding (CY.1-2)
~ - ,
t4 -
! D. C. COOK (1982)!
- s. -
_ __, Page 35 t '-
(
4 6
, I-l.
I
. p l-Recommendatka 1' t
e:
Y l
I89EE8 I
4 S
Finding (CY.1-3)
Recommendation
'~
Response
.4 e
9 6
9
, , , . , .4,* .. ~. * * *** * * * " ' * ~
9y.2 -
~ -
i . . 1
- l r . . ,
- ? D. C. COOK (1982)!
- Page 36
Finding I
. (CY.1-4) 5
'. l J..
Recommendation I' i
Response
CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION PERPORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The chemistry qualification program should ensure that chemistry personnel have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to impleme *
, chemistry practices effectively.
Finding
. (CY.2-1)
I I
e 6
-; , -. ,, 7 m.; ,-
-n- )
~ .
.' D. C. COOK (1982' Page 37 -;
Pinding (CY.2-2)
Recommendation 4' -
[ -
i Response ,
}
i i
CHEMISTRY CONTROL PERPORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Chemistry controls should ensure optimum chemistry conditions during all phases of plant operation.
Finding (CY.3-1)
Recommendation
Response
i t
i 4
5 i i e
6
- . - . . , . . , - . . , . - . . . . . - . . . . .. , . , . , . - . - - . . . _ , _ _ . _ - . . - - . _ _ ..,. , ..r. - , . . . , - -
m,- ,c , ,
- ,
- :a .
t . .
, . s J" . .
, D. C. COOK (1982) j .
j Page 38 Finding -
(CY.3-2) e d
. '. t,
.. i1 :. -
in
. Recommendatier f.
i <
i Response [
t i
e Finding (CY.3-3)
. Recommendation
Response
t s
D 8
e
.W we.p .
D. C. COOK (198 Page 3 LABORATORY ACTIVITIES PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Laboratory and counting room acti ties should ensw
,, accurate measuring and reporting of chemistry parameters.
--W---e Pinding (CY.4-1) l Recommendation Response i Finding (CY.4-2)
Recommendation
Response
l l
l l
Finding (CY.4-3) l.
-~~ -_.
i* '
?
D. C. COOK (1982I Page 40I 1
. e t,
h.
. ) _
. t F
I 4 I
)
l Recommendation
Response
l a
e 9
.i .
D. C. COOK (192
. Page 4 L
'. I r
i e
f
(
I:
I i
Finding (CY.4-4)
Recommendatior:
Response
CHEMICAL AND LABORATORY SAFETY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: Work practices associated with chemistry activiti should ensure the safety of personnel Finding (CY.5-1) i n .
~.
i
, , D. C. COOK (1982)!
Page 42 '
a e t
. g-I t
. e
.k ,
i.
I a
Recommendation
Response
P O
h 9
8 6
9 9
i e
e o
e
br? . *
, -m D. C. COOK (1982) ,
Page 43 fl-e e.
5 I
g?
?-
t.
t 4
e D
i .
e S
. -.__.. _ _ . , ~. _
. l D. C. COC K (1982) '
l APPENDIX I Page 1 :
i APPENDIX I i
' Summarv of Outstanding Response Action from Previous Evaluation O980)
I Organization Structure i (INPO Procedure OA-102, Rev 2) l-
- 2. Finding (Ref. Criterion B) ;
I
. Recommendation
Response
Status ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROIS (INPO Procedure OA-103, Rev.1) l Findine (Ref. Criterion E)-
l Recommendation r
S Respen::: 1 e
9
.g -.:
. , c; .. ,
+- .
~_
D. C. COOK (1982)
APPENDIX l Page 2:
Status i
- i t
RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY, ORGANIZATION AND j
. ADMINISTRATION :
(INPO Procedure RC-501, Rev.1) ,
- 2. Finding (Ref. Criterion D)
~ ~ '
Recorhmendation ,
Response.
' ~
Status-ALARA PROGRAM (INPO Procedure RC-502, Rev.1)
Finding (Ref. Criteria A, B, C, D, and E) ,
Recornmendation
~
Response
4 5
i Status-e I
4 4
~
n,e ,
s .
. 1
. I D. C. COOK (1982) d APPENDIX II ,
Page1 APPENDIX II t
I Performance Objectives Reviewed
- ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION _ !
i i
O A.1 Station Oreanization and Administration l-Station organization and administrative systems should ensure effective imple- i
[
mentation and control of station activities. >
OA.2 Mission. Goals, and Objectives Station mission, goals, and objectives should be established and progress monitored through a formal program.
OA.3 Management Assessment and Quality Procrams Management should assess station activities to ensure and enhance quality performance of all aspects of nuclear plant operation.
OA.4 Personnel Planning and Qualification Personnel programs should ensure that station positions are filled by individuals with proper job qualifications.
OA.5 Industrial Safety Station industrial safety programs should achieve a high degree of personnel safety.
OA.6 Document Control Document control systems should provide correct, readily accessible infer- l j
mation to support station requirements.
OPERATIONS OP.1 Ooerations Organization and Administration ,
The operations organization and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of department activities.
OP.2 Conduct of Ooerations Operational activities should be conducted in a manner that achieves safe an' reliable plant operation.
S
i D. C. COOK (1982)
APPENDIX II ;
Page 2 ;
' OP.3 Plant Status Controls I
, Operational personnel should be cognizant o :
are controlled in a manner that supports safe and reliable operation. !
l
- OP.4 Operations Knowledge and Performance 1 t
Operator knowledge and performance should support safe and r ,
operation. i OP.5 - Operations Procedures and Documentation I Operational procedures and documents should provide appropr should be effectively used to support safe operation of the plant.
OP.6 Operations Facilities and Eouloment Operational facilities and equipment should effectively support pla MAINTENANCE M A.1 Maintenance Organization and Administration The maintenance organization and administrative systems should e tive control and implementation of department activities.
M A.2 Plant Material Condition The material condition of the plant should be maintained to suppor reliable plant operation.
M A.3 Work Control System _
The control of work should ensure that identified mainte properly completed in a safe, timely, and efficient manner.
MA.4 Conduct of Maintenance Maintenance should be conducted in a manner that ens effective plant operation.
i Preventive Maintenance
! M A.5 The preventive maintenance programs should contribute to opt anee and reliability of plant equipment.
M A.6 Maintenance Procedures and Documentation Maintenance procedures should provide appro I t o
,n m- . -:'
gy ,, . . .
a . ~
. 1
, D. C. COOK (1982) !
APPENDIX II Page 3 f,
I MA.7 Maintene. nee History The maintenance history should be used to support maintenance activities
- optimize equipment performance. .
M A.8 Maintenance Pacilities and Equipment f.
Pacilities and equipment should effectively support the performance of main r ance activities.
[
TECHNICAL SUPPORT :
l' 4
TS.1 Technical Support Organization and Administration The technical support organization and administrative systems should ensure effective control and implementation of department activities.
TS.2 Surveillance Testing Program _
Surveillance inspection and testing activities should provide assurance that equipment important to safe and reliable plant operation will perform w required limits.
TS.3 Operations Experience Review Program Industrywide and in-house operating experiences should be evaluated and priate actions undertaken to improve plant safety and reliability.
TS.4 Plant Modifications Plant modification programs should ensure proper review, control, impleme
, tion, and completion of plant design changes in a safe and timely manner.
Rese%c Engineering TS.5
! On-site reactor engineering activities should ensure optimum nuclear reac
- operation without compromising design or safety limits.
TS.6 Plant Efficiency and Reliability Monitoring Performance monitoring activities should optimize plant thermal performance and reliability. ,
TS.7 Technical Support Procedures and Documentation -
Technical support procedures and documents should provide appropriat
' tion and should be effectively used to support safe operation of the plant.
J p
-o - e p --- - - .-----,,.---.y .,cw-- --. <- -m - , .y . . ,- y---.,.y-3 -w
- . - - - m ..w, , .
y ,
t , , ,
I
. D. C. COOK (1982) ,
APPENDIX Il t
! Page 4 !
I-4 TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION r
TQ.1 Training Organization and Administration i
- The training organization and administrative systems should ensure effective [
t .
control and implementation of training activities, i -
t TQ.2 Non-Licensed Operator Training and Qualification t.
The non-licensed operator training and qualification program should develop ;
a improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions. >
TQ.3~
Licensed Operator Training and Qualification The licensed operator training and qualification program should develop and:
improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.4 Shift Technical Advisor Trainine and Qualification The shift technical advisor training program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills to perform assigned job functions.
TQ.5 Maintenance Personnel Training and Qualification The maintenance personnel training and qualification program should develop and improve the knowledge and skills necessary to perform assigned joy functions.
TQ.6 Technical Training for Managers and Engineers
' 3 The technical training program for engineers and managers should broades r
overall knowler.'ge of plant processes and equipment as a supplement tc i position-speciff: education and training.
TQ.7 General Employee Training 4
The general employee training program should develop a broad understanding employee responsibilities and safe work practices.
TQ.8 Training Facilities and Equipment e The training facilities, equipment, and materials should effectively suppor i training activities. ,
RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION RP.1 Radiological Protection Organization and Administration
~ The organization and administrative systems should ensure effective cont:
and implementation of the radiological protection program.
.c .
x - -
x
. D. C. COOK (1982) -
APPENDIX II ~
i Page 5 RP.2 Radiological Protection Personnel Qualification .
The radiological protection qualification program should ensure that radiolog-
-- leal protection personnel have the knowledge and practical'. abilities necessary ;
to effectively implement radiological protection practices. ;
RP.3 General Employee Training In Radiological Protection [
l.~
General employee training should ensure that plant personnel, contractors, and r visitors have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to effec:ively i implement radiological protection practices associated with their work. l1 RP.4 External Radiation Exoosure External radiation exposure controls should minimize personnel radiation ex-posure.
RP.5 Internal Radiation Exposure Internal radiation exposure controls should minimize internal exposures.
RP.6 Radioactive Effluents Radioactive effluent controls should minimize radioactive materials released to the environment.
RP.7 Solid Radioactive Waste Solid radioactive waste controls should minimize the volume of radioactive waste and ensure safe transportation of radioactive material.
RP.8 Personnel Dosimetry The personnel dosimetry program should ensure that radiation exposures are accurately determined and recorded.
RP.9 Radioactive Contamination Control Radioactive contamination controls should minimize the contamination of areas, equipment, and personnel.
CHEMISTRY CY.1 Chemistrv Oreanization and Administration The organization and administrative systems should ensure effective imple-mentation and control of the chemistry program.
W: .. s *
' D. C. COOK (1982)
APPENDIX II ~
Page 6 CY.2 Chemistry Personnel Qualification ,
The chemistry qualification program should ensure that chemistry personnel have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to implement chemistry -
practices effectively.
l
,CY.3 Chemistry Control f
Chemistry controls should ensure optimum chemistry conditions during all
- phases of plant operation. -
t CY.4 Laboratory Activities Laboratory and counting room activities should ensure accurate measuring and reporting of chemistry parameters.
$ CY.5 Chemical and Laboratory Safety Work practices associated with chemistry activities should ensure the safety of personnel.
G
~
J