ML20115A094
| ML20115A094 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Waterford |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1984 |
| From: | Singh B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Parr O Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082170562 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-143 NUDOCS 8402150551 | |
| Download: ML20115A094 (4) | |
Text
i.
[ef Distribution FEb i ES4 Docket File A58 Rdg. File ASB Members
$M5m3h 9
te1DRABWUM FOR: Olan D. Parr, Chief. Auxiliary Systems Branch. Otvision of 3
Systens Integration FR0ft:
Brej K. Singh. Auxiliary Systems Branch Division of Systems Integrstion Spe1 JECT:
TRIP REPORT - MATDtFGRD 3 CONTROL R0WI HA81TA81LITY TASK FORCE I visited the Waterfs,rd 3 site as a mas 6er of the control room habitability l
study team on January 24-25. 1g04. This plant uns selected as a representative of neuer plant designs and as a potentially hazardous site. Upon the request of the task force project manager this report is organized in three sections:
(1) Heating. Ventilation,andAirConditioning(NVAC) system.(2) Generic General Concerns, and (3) Overall perspective. iihls report will be integrated into the ste(y teen's final report.
1.
HVAC System The Meterford 3 control room air conditioning system is designed to maintain a suitable environment for ipment operation and safe occupency of the control room under normal emergency conditions. The system serves the i
control team envelope which consists of the main control room, computer team, toilet areas, kitchenette and kitchen, conference room and vault, storage and emergency storage areas. locker rooms. amerimacy living guerters and corriders. The control resa air conditionong system consists of tuo fully redundant essential trains of air handling units including filters, fans, chilled unter cooling cells, electric heating coils, ductuork and despers.1solatten valves and nonessential exhaust fans.
The system else includes tas redundant essential energency filtration units required for energency operation consisting of fans. electric heating osils, ductuerk and despers. 1 solation valves, median efficiency f11ters. IEpA filters. and cherceal filters for removal of radioactivity and temic gases.
under normal operating canditions. thn. eentrol room is maintained at a i
slight positive pressury. Outside air is prorided through a single air intate with redundant essential normally open. fail closed, air operated feelation valves. Outside air is supplied in emergency con-dittens threegh tus widely separated air intakes each with two parallel series pairs (eight total) of redundant essential motor operated isolation volvest one valve fa each series pair is nornelly open and one is normally cleted.
N contact:
Fo / A-94-N3 Y&#
g} SS amesp
-~
~m
~
I mmenun memme OFFICIAL RECORD COPY m%
u..
:
- = =
l FEB
& EH 2-Redundant radiation, chlorine gas and amonia detectors are located near the noraal system outside air intake. Receipt of a high radia$1on signal or safety injection signal automatically isolates the normal outside air intake and exhaust. epens the recirculation dampers, opens' the emergency outside air intakes and starts the actrgency filtration units.
The control room is then aperated in a pressurized mode drawing air from the separate emergency intake locations and passing a portion of the air through the MEpA and charcoal filters for cleanup. The operator may isolate one of the mergency outside air intakes if contamination is suspected. Receipt of a tonic gas signal autenatically isolates the outside air intake and exhaust, opees the recirculation dampers and starts the emergency foltration units. The control room is then operated in an <solatten mode with no outside air.
The system incorporates provisions for the purging of smoke, or other contaminants with no recirculatten by bringing in fresh outside air i
and enhevsting the contaminated air to the outside.
The computer room is provided with a supplemental nonsafety recirculating air handling unit consisting of a medim efficiency filter, cooling coil and centrifugal fan. This unit is manually started when required during normal operation.
In the event of a fire in the control room. the plant can be safely shut-down fram the remote shutdown panel which is not part of the control roari envelope.
The control room air condittening system is designed for a sumer dry bulb temperature of 33*F (81*F wet halb temperature) and winter temperature j
of 32*F.
In response to a staff guestion regarding this desip basis.
the licensee indicated that a more conservative postulated 102'F dry bulb super temperature with 1005 relative humidity and 5'F winter temperature will result in a centrol reen temperature change of 0.5'F during the sammer and 1.3*F during the winter assuming only one train of the IWAC system is operab1r. The applicant will provide their i
calculattens for review by the task force.
The applicent previted a very conservative estimate that in the event of loss of both trains of the air conditioning system. the. control room will became uninhabitable after 10 minutes, and essential equipment controls wil' met flanction after 15 minutes. The task force will review this analysis in detail as a general concern.
The applicant has stated that should remote control of the control room 1
air totake isolatten valves be lost, they can be manually operated locally.
While no credit was taken for this manual action for licensing purposes, we noted while melkisp through the plant, that it was very difficult for an operator to reach the valves either at the normal air intake or at emergency air intakes lines. The applicant indicated that after the plant is com91sted, they may provide some means for reaching these m~-
886
~.~~
-~.
"' D'
~.-
=.
i Cb ~--
'8'"***'*mesus OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
3 FEB pg 2.
Generic Issues 2.1 TMI tsuv.
n.'
t The task forse ineutred whether the operators will be aware that the filtration system is properly fonettoning due to noble nas influe uhtch casmet be reseved threegh the charco,al filters.
stated that the operator is autre of the seenit.g of the radiation"he applicant nobl as and radiatten concentration at the outside air intake. alarum 2.2 Chierts cejggg In ressen.- 4 a task force question the applicant stated that a chlorine mentter is uhen to epi. the outside air intake efter it has been deterufned t chlertne havW has been cleared.
3.
Overall peressetfwe From the perspective of the task force review, the Waterford Unit 3 minor clarificettens as fellems: control reen air condittening system is well desig
- a. The applicant should provide the calculatten showing the sensitivity of the centrol veen temperature to the outside air temperature and hebttabflity and egeipment qualificetten temperatures.the abfl b.
Noens should be provided for the operater to reach ~the air intake isolatten velves in order to facilitate local manual operation of them.
- c. A stu b should be endertaken to determine if auske removal can be accomplished from the control reen in a timely menner in the event of a fire in the control reen envelope.
Snake 1 toilet enheest fan er kitchen and conference room: exhaust fans. purged through the maximum cepetity of the kitches and conference room exheest fans is The 960 cfm and that of the tellet enhemst fan is 1040 cfu.
d.
The less of both treins of the vent 11atten system and its effect en the behitability and egoisment qualificatten temperatures should be investigated in more detail for Materford and as a generic issue by the task force.
B. K. Singh Auxiliary Systems Branch Divisten of Systems Integration nsEsa
~~~7' Aleratel mm csesmemanessesmen GFFICLAL RECORD COPY i
murama
- r l
.. FEB gg cc:
R. Mattaen D. h11er I
L. hbonstein W. 8mm111 l
J. Hayes J. Werniel Y. Geneveye D. Eisenhut R. Ferguson T. 084F J. Wilson. DL J. Wilson. 0$!
L Dupsq 1
l l
I l
l e
9 l
l W
4
t March 1, 1934 TO ALL APPLICANTS FOR OPERATING LICENSFS AND FULL-POWER A1JTHORIZAT!0' Gentlemen:
Meeting Stannary A meeting was held with representatives from utilities holdino active applications for operating licenses and full-power authorizations on January 26,1984 in Bethesda. Maryland. The purpose of the meeting was to infom the utilities of MRC concerns related to limited operating experience of operating crews and to discuss the development of an acceptable experience omfile for new plants. A cony of the meetino notice, agenda, and slides used in the discussions is attached, includino s list of meettnq attendees.
1 Onenine Remarks t
Mr. Denton provided opening remarks and introduced Comissioner Gilinsky who was cresent for Comissioner Asselstine. Comissioner Gilinsky set the stage for the meeting with opening remarks that highlighted the imnortance of this issue to public health and safety and traced the development of licensing criteria for operatino crew experience in the nost-TMI era.
The Commissioner pointed out that the move to bring in advisors as a means of gaining operators with on-shift experience has come under critical scrutiny for several reasons:
o diluted / unclear responsibilities advisors leave and the utility is left without assistance o
lack of incentive to learn plant o
market for itinerant ex-licensed operators has denleted o
cool of operters SRos who were going to obtain a cold license were not o
reouired to have been an R0 for one year nunber of near term plants have a shift crew with little o
or no previois licensed comercial experience at a similar plant Comissioner Gilinsky concluded that what is necessary is an inventory of operators that matches the needs of the industry.
Mr. Denton suggested that a long tem point of view from the industry, nerhaps amoloying innovative methods, would be necessary to provide an adequate supply of trained and experienced operators for the remaininq plants seeking an coerating license.
FotA-84-143 e/s o.,o,
.i.
- o ooo g
.k..,...._..........,......................,....._....g._.....
7, cr c roaw ne no aoomem oe.o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
~
11 E
I -
- i l
Staff Presentatio_n The staff presented the results of a recent infomal survey of shift oneratinq experience. The survey results pointed to a shortage of experienced operatino l
personnel on shift.
A list of issues was Drovided relating to the problem Concerning shift oDeratino experience faced by near-tem plants. Because of Constission interest in this.
the staff will need to obtain Comerission approval for the level of operating experience needed before licensing the near-tem olents. The staff identified some possible methods for obtairing additional shift operating experience.
as shown in the enclosed slide n.ackage. The staff suggested that the indust y collectively propose some interim measures that the staff could supoort during the Coussission Briefing. In particular. those utilities very close (within three months) to licensing need to identify methods of obtaining operating experience on shift. The staff concluded with a twouest for an industry response to be used in preparation for a Cesarission briefing being scheduled for r bruary 23,1984 A staffing ouestionnaire intended to assist in develoning e
the Cont 31ssion briefing was passed out and is also attached to this Meeting supunary.
. Dis _cussion During the discussion period several ouestions were received from the audience.
The following summary is intended to capture the major points that were I
raised by the industry and the NRC.
4 Five typical industry questions and the MtC staff response are listed below:
1.
nuestion - - Is the industry limited to the MtC suggested methods i
of obtaining shift operating experience?
Answer
- - No, the industry may use other creative methods not yet proposed. The industry proposed methods may be contined with already existing methods.
2.
Question - - Wry is the loaned SR0 better than the advisor? There are some good advisors available.
Answer
- - The important point is to place the person with the experience in a place where the experience counts.
The Mtc is inviting the industry to be innovative. tut the overall objective is to have SRO's at a newly licensed plant withpprovious operating experience.
3.
Question - - Has MtC eliminated credit for Navy experience?
Answer
- - No. Navy experience is still useful expericM but it cannot be counted on a 1 for 1 basis.
.l weav 1
..n p u = m y nacuare,
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY i
- w. o -
- 4.
Queition - - What part of the operator. job needs previous experience in the eyes of the NRC7 Answer
- - The NEC feels that experience is generally both valuable and desirable.
In particular. NRC feels operating experience is what we are looking for.
5.
Question - - Why is the advisor program no longer accentable?
Answer
- - Advisors were first used for licensing as early as 1981.
It was introduced as a stoo-gap measure.
l not the total answer. The results have been mixed:
the advisors have not appsered to have been helpful in overcoming the lack of experience on shift. and the overall situation in terms of experienced licensed coerators does not appear to be any better today than three years ago. The fact that the Cosmiission does not see a strong movement on the part of the industry to get experienced licensed operators on each shift has resulted in the view that the advisor program is no longer acceptable.
The industry then proceeded to point out that the training that they provide their operators is sufficient esperience to prepare them for their duties in operating a ner plant.
In particular, operators are sent to other operating facilities for brief periods to sheerve and to participate in a training casocity.
Meeers of the industry cautioned IWIC to be careful not to depote the escorience of the already operating reacters. lett staff agreed that it didn't meet to seriously deplete the operating reactors, but to encourage the industry as a graue to prosese solottens to the problem of a lack of operating esperience at nerly licensed plants. INIC staff called this meeting because they felt that the lack'ef operating experience uns an industry-wide problem and not a single ettlity problem.
Both the industry and the 151C staff agrood that a time arablem faced the near-teen licensees. A moder of the industry guestioned if anything significant could be prosesed which usuldn't nogetively innect some other programs. INtC staff that the methods proposed for the near-term licensees would be di fWem those proposed for the remaining licensees.
The IntC staff made a statement that Rwienal resources are adequate to administer emans to these uhe need them.
".c p
.aan >..................
n o n, g........
- * * * = =
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY m
T
4 p.
-4 Caucu,s, 1
i The industry attendees caucussed for a brief period, after which the followinq CoRFlitments W9re made:
1.
Ocq F. Senne11 was designated spokesman for the near term grouo including:
Otablo Canyon 1 Grand Gulf 1 WIP-2 Susovehanna 2 Byron 1 LaSalle 2 t
callaway 1 Watts Bar 1/2 i
Shoreham 1 Palo Verde 1 Waterford 3 The group will meet during the first week in February,1984 and contact l
H. Suoher. Chief. Licensee Ous11fications Branch (301) 492-4816 j
shortly themafter to arrange for a meeting to prepare for Concission briefing scheduled for late in February.
2.
Hal 8. Tucker was designated spokesman for the remaining OL applicants.
A meeting will be arrenced to discuss the longer term program proposals in the near future.
Adjourn The meeting was adjourned with Mr. Denton restating his desire to encourage the industry to work with the staff in a joint effort to eliminate the barriers and impediesnts that hinder the develonnent of exnerienced licensed operators for the nuclear industry.
i John Hannon. Technical Assistant Division of Licensing j
i l
l l
(D k
f SM 1
i l
.. D L.......
...DHf5.,,,,,,,,
.....Djyf}.,
'p j
-JHanea:mj..
RBenedict,,, HThomoson RP e
~ DG g.2/,.&f,8,4,,
2f,,
,,f8,f,
,2f,,,,f,S4,,,,
,jS4,,
%/84 l
'
- o sm w u o..
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
U)
NRC MEETING January 26, 1984, 1: 00 p. m.
l ATTEi4 DEES NAME COMPANY l
H. R. Booher NRC D. C. Goodson NRC J:;rrold Dewease Houston Lighting & Power Dennis Co@
houston Lighting & Power 8fily R. Clements Texas Utilities Generating Co.
James C. Kuykendall Texas Utilities Generating Co.
George Sockhold Georgia Power D. O. Foster Georgia Power Richard R. Stickney Washington Public Power Supply System R. 8. Dewitt Consumers Power Co.
J. F. Fir 11t Consumers Power Co.
D. J. VandeWalle Consumers Power Co.
Michael D. Lyster Cleveland Electric Illuminating Larry Sede Cleveland Electric Illuminating J. R. Patten Illinois Power Co.
T. F. Plunkett Illinois Power Co.
Glenn L. Koester Kansas Gas & Electric Co.
Ferrest T. Rhodes Kansas Gas & Electric Co.
i R. W. Sulmer Philadelphia Electric Co.
W. T. Ullrich Philadelphia Electric Co.
l William D. Travers NRC/0EDO Pierce Skinner NRC/ Region II M. S. Pollock Long Island Lighting Co.
M. A. McDuffie Carolina Power & L'ight Co.
A. C. To111 son, Jr.
Carolina Power & Light Co.
J. I. McMillen NRC/ Region III R. D. Walker NRC/ Region III l
Denis Hanson PSE&G, Sales, New Jersey 2/1/84 7
NEETING
SUMMARY
Mh i
ATTENDEES NAME COMPANY R. S. Salvesen PSE&G Co.
Roger Huston EPM, Inc.
M F. Capicchioni Consumers' Power Co.
J. H. Taylor Babcock & Wilcox Leon E. Whitney IE/DQASIP/0RP8/Section 1 Homer Schmidt Texas Utilities J. 8. George Texas Utilities John H. Austin NRC/0CM John A. 01shinski NRC Region II W. T. Cottle TVA K. P. Baskin So. Calif. Edison L. M. Mills TVA R. L. Phelps SCE S. H. Chesnut OCM J. K. Joosten NRC/0CM R. E. Ireland NRC/R IV D. H. Seckham NRC/DNFS/0L8 T. H. Cox NRC/DEDR0GR R. O. Sharpe Duke Power Co.
Hal 8. Tucker Duke Power Co.
Deborah A. 22 user
. Pittman, Potts & Troworidge Tom Houghton IOC Inc.
Bill Long NRC/04FS Gary Coldich Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
C. 8. Brinteen A ombustion Engineering Inc. CS f:rl Hill 8echtel T. M. Novak NRC l
J. J. Carey Duquesne Light Co.
J F. Zagerski Duquesne Light Co.
R. S. Loddick Louisiana P & L Lynn Connor The NRC Calendar 2/1/84 8
MEEYING $UMMARY
E ATTENDEES
^
NAME COMPANY Ron Rodriguez SMUD C. T. Coddington Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.
R. P. 8arkhurst Louisiana Power & Light J. Shiffler Pacific Gas & Electric J. O. Schuyler Pacific Gas & Electric L. Wheeler NRC/NRR Edwin E. Van Brunt, Jr.
Arizona Public Sereice Co.
J. R. Bynum Arizona Public Service Co.
Tom Trama Commonwea1*.h Edison R. E. Querio Commonwealth Edison - Byron Sta.
H. J. Heilmeier 8&W J. V. Watson 8&W P. J. Swanson PSNH G. S. Thomas PSNH R. G. Stotts Northeast Utilities P. Capello-Bandzes Northeast Utilities J. 8. Richard Wississippi Power & Light Co.
K. F. Zo111tsch Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
T. E. Leapges Niagara Mowhawk Power Corp.
John E. Arthur Rochester Gas & Electric Kenneth Burton Northeast Utilities Nina Bell Steven M11tenberger union Electric Don F. Schnell Union Electric Edward P. Griffing Detroit Edison Wayne M..Jons Detroit Edison William H. Odell Gulf States Utilities Co.
John R. Hamilton Gulf States Utilities Co.
Jim Doddens Gulf States Utilities Co.
John E. Price Gulf States Utilities Co.
John Hannon NRC 2/1/84 9
MEEllNG $UMMARY e
s Md v-,
r y
((
\\
UfflTED STATES p!
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION wasemoron. o. c. zones January 6,1984 TO ALL APPLICANTS FOR OPERATING LICENSES AND FULL-POWER AUTHORIZ Gentlemen:
1
Subject:
Notice of Meeting Regarding Facility Staffing (Generic Letter 84-02)
We have completed a preliminary analysis of the data submitted in response to a survey that was initiated in early December 1983. One of the concerns that emerges from a review of the data is the potential for a limited amount of commercial nuclear power plant operating experience among members of the i
operating staff at the time of licensing. This concern has prompted us to arrange a meeting with you where we can discuss the issue in general and give you our views on what needs to be done to deal with the various problem areas.
The meetin is scheduled for ifpM a *a= haery 25,1964 in the Ph14MS
- Building,
.P-US. 792R Narreir, ma.Wasssa, na.
svule. We request that at least one, but not more than two individuals, from each ' utility attend the meeting.
A senior officer responsible for staffing and. if desired, the manager of training would be appropriate representatives.
The purpose of the meeting is to thform you of our concern and to share with you our present thinking on acceptable experience profiles for Itcensing new plants.
We would welcome a general discussion of the issues; no plant-specific presentations are requested.
Follow-on meetings with individual applicants may be necessary to discuss plant-specific issues and their resolution.
Please advise the NRR Project Manager by January 20, 1984 ff you will not be able to attend.
h Darrell G. Eisenhut. Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Rc3aor Regulation l
Ah
^
A b
ovp/ cpy p&cacs / 5
'{
1 uss:TOsTATas i
NUCLEAR RESULATORY COMMISSION masw.worow.e.e.neses January 17, 1984 ket Nos.: 50-4N.-438. M MI. AiI[
455. 485. 4 0, 414 323. 341, 416,. 400, 3 M, 445, 446, 275. 374. 352. 54'6. 32(.
423, 4M. 528. 527. $30. 440
.322,498.3s8.424,4/5.382
. 450. 397. 50s. 158 FORTH COMING E ETING WITH: OL APPLICANTS TIME & DATE:
1 PM. January 26. 1984 LOCATION:
Phillips Building Room P-118 PURPOSE:
Inform utilities of NRC concern related to limited coerational experience on operating crews and discuss the development of an acceptable experience profile for new plants.
GROUPS PARTICIPATING:
Duquesne TVA Northeast Nuclear Energy Niagara Mohawk Power Commonwealth Edison Arizona Public Service Union Electric Cleveland Electric Duke Power Illinois Power Illuminating Gulf States Utilities Texas Utilities Generating Public Service of New Pacific Gas and Electric Hampshire Detroit Edison Long Island Lighting Co.
Mississippi Power & Light Company Houston Lighting & Power Co.
Carolina Power & Light Company Pennsylvania Power & Light Public Service Electric & Gas Georgia Power Philadelphia Electric Public Service of Indiana Louisiana Power & Light Kansas Gas & Electric Consumers Power Washington Public Power Supply System Cincinnati Gas & Electric NRC:
Harold R. Denton, Director. NRR. etal Due to the laroe number of utilities involved and minimum soece available, NRR particioation in this meeting will be limited to those nersgns invited by Mr. Denton.
w^
I John Hannon. Technical Assistant Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Renulation
\\
pak y n q)A<of-u n r-n
\\~s vM'
~ T \\ '7. ~ %%
Ig
\\
SHIFT OPERATING EXPERIENCE MEETING JANUARY 26, 1984 m
m
AGENDA SHIFT OPERATING EXPERIENCE JANUARY 26, 1984 BETHESDA, MD PHILLIPS BUILDING - ROOM P-118 INT 50DUCTORYREMARKS 1:00 PM COMMISSIONER ASSELSTINE HAROLD DENTON DPERATINGEXPERIENCESURVEY 1:20 PM AND STAFF OBJECTIVES OPEN DISCUSSION 1:40 PM ADJOURN 3:00 PM l
ISSUES LACK 0F PLANT STAFF SHIFT OPERATING EXPERIENCE SHORTAGE OF EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL ALREADY COMMITTED TO ADVISORS LACK OF PLANT REFERENCED SIMULATORS LACK OF NATIONAL TRAINING PROGRAM COMMISSION POLICY AND PLANNING GUIDANCE, 1984 NUREG-0885, JANUARY 1984 NRC STAFF SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER:
~
NEED AT EVERY PLANT FOR SOME REACTOR OPERATORS WITH COMMERCIAL EXPERIENCE
~
COMPETENCE AND EXPERIENCE OF FACILITY MANAGEMENT AND STAFF NEED FOR, AND BENEFITS OF, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ASSURING ADEQUATE LEVEL OF EXPERIENCE AND COMPETENCE IN LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INFORMAL SURVEY OF NEW OL APPLICANTS GENERIC LETTER 84-02 O
a m
3
- &e
M RESULTS OF SHIFT OPERATING EXPERIENCE SURVEY 29 UTILITIES 33 PLANTS 20 PWR 13 BWR 8 PLANTS PLAN - 5 SHIFT ROTITION 24 PLANTS PLAN - 6 SHIFT ROTATION O
____._a
U STAFF OBJECTIVES 1.
AT LEAST ONE SR0 ON EACH OPERATING SHIFT SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 0F ONE YEAR OF HOT OPERATING EXPERIENCE ON A SIMILAR TYPE COMMERCIAL PLANT AT THE SRO LEVEL 2.
ELIMINATE USE OF TECHNICAL ADVISORS FOR MEETING f11NIMUM SHIFT CREW EXPERIENCE LEVEtS 3.
ALL SR0s SHOULD HAVE SUBSTANTIAL HOT OPERATING EXPERIENCE AS BQ1 AT FACILITY ON WHICH LICENSED OR SIMILAR FACILITY:
9 O
I
~~^
RESULTS OF SURVEY 1.
ONLY ONE-THIRD OF BOTH PWRs (7) AND BWRs (4) HAVE SR0s WITH SIGNIFICANT (MORE THAN 10 MAN-YEARS TOTAL) HOT OPERATING EXPERIENCE AS SR0s ON SIMILAR PLANTS.
2.
NINE PWRs AND FIVE BWRs HAVE SR0s WITH SIGNIFICANT HOT OPERATING EXPERIENCE AS ROs.
3.
THREE PWRs AND ONE BWR HAVE SR0s WITH NO HOT OPERATING EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR TYPE PLANT.
4.
ONE-THIRD OF THE PLANTS (11) EITHER HAVE AN INADE0VATE NUMBER OF SR0s OR ARE PLANNING TO STAFF WITH A BARE MINIMUM 0F SR0s.
l S.
ONE-THIRD OF THE PLANTS (10) HAVE NO SR0s WITH ENGINEERING DEGREES.
HALF 0F THESE TEN HAVE NO SR0s WITH DEGREES OF ANY TYPE.
l
..r--.-
3
.-_w w
--v---
+ - -
e-1 SOME POSSIBLE METHODS FOR OBTAINING ADDITIONAL SHIFT OPERATING EXPERIENCE STAFF WITH SR0s PREVIOUSLY LICENSED ON SIMILAR FACILITIES HAVE SR0s SERVE ON-SHIFT AT ANOTHER SIMILAR OPERATING FACILITY HAVE SR0s' SERVE AS ASSISTANT ~TO SS AT A SIMILAR FACILITY (ONE MONTH IN TRAINING EQUIVALENT TO ONE MONTH OPERATION, UP TO ONE YEAR)
SPEND EXTRA TIME ON PLANT REFERENCE SIMULATOR (ADDITIONAL SIMULATOR TIME CONSIDERED AS A WAY OF GETTING SOPE OF THE NEEDED EXPERIENCE)
USE SR0s LOANED FROM OTHER UTILITIES HAVE SHIFT ADVISORS OBTAIN SRO LICENSE AT FACIL!TY p
REQUESTED UTILITY RESPONSES l
l RESPOND TO SURVEY OF INDIVIDUAL OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITHIN TWO WEEKS PROPOSE INTERIM MEASURES FOR PLANTS TO BE LICENSED WITHIN NEXT THREE MONTHS WITHIN ONE MONTH PROPOSE ACTIONS TO INCREASE SHIFT OPERATING EXPERIENCE OVER TIME eID
- 9
rre s iminiery sce:>u L3 us asis us.. i (Nota:
Fig res m6 not b2 accurate because survey questionaire may ;not have been interpreted the same way by each uti lty)
Nor Ennrt/ tam
- r r#frKE
- w/ peg rus A6 3R0 43 R0 A3 KO CONNENT.5 Luc.
Sin.
n Og Ag f pyE M
MM Sam MS W.
OMR Ng kg ht Bd MM
~
IIABLO CA:1 YON 1 2-84 PWR 1984 5
25 7
1 0
6 0
13.5 16 0
0 iRAND GULF 1 3-84 BWR 1982 5
10 5
4 0
1 0
0 13 0
1.5 INP-2 2-84 BWR 1983 6
23 6
2 12 7
3 12 8
4 0
iUS00DIANNA 2 2-84 BWR 1979 5
12 0
1 1
223 6
3 10 0
1 3 YR0'4 1 2-84 PWR 1983 6
20 9
4 4
0 19.5 0
18 0
0 LA SALLE 2 3-84 BWR 1983 6
27 4
4 0
35 0
15 23 0
28 CALLAWAY 1 3-84 PWR 1983 6
22 3
4 1.5 0
9 0
15 0
0
'dATTS RAR bN
~
9-8S Sil0REllNi !
3-84 "IllR 6
18 9
2 0
0 0
0 14 0
0 1
l PALO VERDE 1 4-84 PWR 1900 6
27 7
3 15 4.8 13.8 5.6 17 1
1.5 Includes some ooerj l
for Unit 2 i
I 'JATERFORD 3 5-84 PWR 6
16 1
0 22 0
24 0
12 9
0 l
l 5
17 9
2 0
0 2.3 0
25 0
0 CA T Alfl A 1 5-84 PHR 2
P FERMI ?
6-84 BWR 1984 5
12 0
0 0
1.5 0
0 24 0
0 Nav S exper nc CWMNfill P1 4 1 7-84 PWR.
6 26*
0 0
34*
0 14 0
11 0
0 Ircludes advisors > 5 con tra HOLF CREFK 1 7-84 PWR 1982
, 6 12 0
2 0
0 0
0 18 1
0 0
SEA 3R00K 1 9-84 PWR 1980 6
15 0
6 13 0
20 4
24 0
0 4
(
~
WLO'Li M-M -filWL llWA-ll--
1 1 -
R-- A 1 - *
- Al*
NOT EaMRstacs kr EnvKwA*E
L oc.
son.
n e
wr a.re nn aire.w m ses <=.
,,-n u,
=<
~,
ow as ew se i
j ll4ER I 11-84 BWt 6
35 8
6 0
4 0
8 11 0
1 i
f3 0s a1s LIMERICK 1 3-05 BWR 1981 6
12 0
0 0
20 0
20 18 0
0 n
GR.
RIVER' BEN 0 1 4-85 SWR 1983 6
12 0
2 3
1.5 4.5 5.5 18 0
0 i
l 3RAIDWOOD 1 4-85 PWR 1983 6
18 9
7
?
?
?
?
24 0
0
- s are goals.
No SR0s not j
SHEAR 0fl HARRIS 1 5-85 IHR 1977 6
12 0
0 16 4
14 8
12 0
0 IILLSTONE 3 11-85 PWR 6
18 22*
0 15 8
11.5 8.5 14 0
0 j
Includes staff SR05 4
i 3EAVER VALLEY 2 12-85 PWR 1984 stated they will meet requirements CLINTON 1 12-85 BWR 6
18 8
0 0
81
' 1.4 0
2 20 0
0 HOPE CREEK 1 1,06 BWR 1984 5
10 0
0 2.2 10 31.8 5
10 6
0 j NINE 'llLE POINT 2 2-06 SWR 5
2 4
0 0
16 0
30 3
0 23 J
j MARBLE IllLL 1 6-86 PWR 6
2 0.
1 10 6
8 2
24 0
0 i.
j tilDLAND 2 9-86 PWR 1983 6
14 6
0 3
0 3
0 12 0
0 1
} V0GTI E 1 9-86 PWR 1983 5
15 39 0
0 0
0 0
25 0
PWR 1983 6
2 0
1 23 3
21 0
2 0
0 WHP-3 6-87 PWR 1983 6*
12*
j Planned, Not s taf fed vet 3EllFF0ftT5 1 l')-87 Pi1R 1983 5
20 1
5 10 25 15 20 27 20 25
- 's e
g
i
. STAFFING QUESTIONNAIRE Plant Name:
Total r:;r::ber c' Shift Supervisors (the person in charge of operating shift) presently on operating shift work Proposed total number of Shift Supervisors on operating shift work at tirne of fuel load Total number of Shift Supervisors presently on plant staff other than normal operating shift (e.g., substitutes)
Proposed total number of Shift Supervisors on plant staff other than normal operating shift at time of fuel load Total number of licensed SR0s presently en operating shift work (do not include those Itsted above as SS)
Proposed total nuseer of SR0s on operating shift work at tir.1e of fuel load (do not include.those listed above as SS)
"otal number of licensed SA0s presentTy on plant staff other than normal operating shift work (e.g., training instructors, engineers, substitutes)
Proposed total number of licensed SR0s.on plant staff other than nonnal operating shift work Total nummer of Itcensed R0s presently on operating shift work __
Proposed total number of R0s on operating shift work at time of fuel load Total number of Shift Technical Advisors (or others who perfonn STA function) l on operating shift work Type of shift rotation schedule for STA (24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, etc.)
Total number of STAS not on operating shift work (e.g., substitutes)
/
1 i
r
w d
g.
li,s go=t l
s _8 -
-eE=
l I*lif O
,.,-l'
.t i
i ka:=E gemp5m t
3 C*
g.."
.en a s
{"
5s=c i
b i
y I
~
!I
,.n:!h.E E
I !
E a
a.
I u n5sa 55 I3 2
i g
=a 3 E 3 1
i R=
~
5 k
6 8 -
!- 5'Eit me 2
I..
3 1
gE ia -
8 i
-=Ra
=
s g
e.
6 W
_I c
a A=
w m
3 1
M,.
- ~
e gjem 4
3.3-sic l
4
.r 2
W S
t
=
1%
51" l
=
l
^
11 4
_i is i
~1
! lj
=~
..IIIIII II II I--
III
_fL
e e
g
.t
.Iis,
..t Nb l
i i
I.i.:
[I*-
I I !
- I: I
- .i 12.I l! i
ad*I
=:s3 ln Isyt i
==ss 4
jse.
g$5h i
== 2 m.
5.
3 I.at
. n..
.glit
.I:
Idg*3
=3wE Ew3:$
E s.*
sa.
e
-=
em t.
li.3:=
s 1=y.
a e
13 i
a
~
aus a
g a
3
=
I 3
s q
,sssssssssiis n!!!!!!
a e
._