ML20114G085
| ML20114G085 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde, Waterford, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 09/26/1983 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Deyoung R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082170562 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-143 NUDOCS 8310050426 | |
| Download: ML20114G085 (7) | |
Text
-
SEP 26 R13 MEMORAllDUM FOR: Richard C. DeYoung, Olrector Offlee of Inspection and Enforcement FROM:
Darrell C. Eisenhut, Otractor Divlsten of Lleensing Office of Nuclear haector Regulation
SUBJECT:
CONSTRUCTION S EVALUATIONS PRIOR TO IS$UANCE OF AN OPERATING LICENSE At our request, Reglen V provided us with the attached report for Palo Verde concerning an evaluetten of, (1) the significant construction deficiencie s fc.e this facility and (2) the effectiveness of its construction phase qA program.
A similar report, also attached, ens prepared for Waterford 3 ty Region IV.
We have revleued the reports and eenclude that they provide good sumaries of the effectiveness of the GR programs at these facilities.
We roomumend that such evoluettens be performed by all Regions and reportec for eosh pending OL and roguest your assistance in establishing such a progra-with the neglens. The evolesotions should be performed when constructicw. Is about sin omnths from esopletlen with the resulting report available. ebout three sonths prior to isomenes of a leu power lleense.-
We suggest that the report include as a alnlansa the following elements:
twelustion of Significant Cons:,ruction Deficiencies Effectiveness of M Program Sesenery of SALP Eawleus Results of Prosperational Test Program 8:t ri.t Design havlow (where applicable)
We request your assistance in this metter and are prepared to meet wlth you tc discess it further.
/s/ Darrell C. Eisenhut terrell C. Eisenhut, Director O
CF Division of Licensing Offl e of Nuclear Reactor Regulat W cc: Regirmal Administrators F0/ A I+3 Attechments:
As stated
" RETYPED PER ECCASE
[... '
4.1..R amcet eu==ame>
dfo..Dt t...
nn> 3 Q....
OFF1Cl AL RECOR DYOf ec eonu sie om once me.e
<=- - n
IENDRANDUM FOR: Thomas E.Murley, Regional Adminstrator, Region !
James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator, Region ::
James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator, Region III John T. Collins, Regional Administrator, Region !v John B. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region V FROM:
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
CONSTRUCTION QA EVALUATIONS PRJ0i TO ISSUANCE OF AN OPERATING LICENSE
/
j
~.
Recentley Regions II and h'provided us w)d the reports for OL facilities which include an evaluation of (1) the significant construction deficiencies for this facility and (2)'the effectiveness of its constructior.
phase QA program. A similar report, Also attached, was prepared for Waterford 3 by Region IV.
I have reviewed these reports and conclude that they provide good management susenaries of the effectiveness of the programs at these facilities.
I recommend that such evaluations be performed and reported for all pending OLs. The evaluations should be performed when construction is abNt six months from completion with the resulting report available about three r.0 iths prior to issuance of a j ow power license.
l I suggest that the report include as a minimum the following elements:
~
Evaluation offSignificant Construction Deficiencies Effectiveness;of QA Program i
Summary of SA.P Review f
Results of P 4 operational Test Pmgram
.IndependentDesignReview(where' applicable)
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated 1
\\
~
- See previous co nee.
DL:LBf3*
DL:LBf3 OL:AD/L' DL:DIR*
NRR:D !i' EAlicitra/yt GWKnighton TMNovak DGEisenhut HRDen' '
i 9/ /83 94t/83 9/ /83 9/ /83 9/
M 1
---t
--__y*-
-,.g
,.,_,,m, gym,.__
.,m,,.-_
NMi-Shd. '
/
MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas E.Murley, Regional Adminstrator, Region I
/
JamesP.O'Reilly,RegionalAdministrator, Region /
James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator, R:.gio 111 John T. Collins, Regional Administrator, Re n IV John B. Martin, Regional Administrator, R on V l
FROM:
\\
Harold R. Denton, Director l
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regula n
-\\
SUBJECT:
CQNSTRUCTION QA EVALUATIONS 10R TO ISSUANCE OF AN OPERATING LICENSE Recentley Regions II and V vi us with the reports for OL facilties which include an evaluation 1 the significant construction deficiencies for this facility
.d (2) the effectiveness of its construction phase QA program. A similar po', also attached, was prepared for Waterford 3 by Region IV.
have iewed these reports and conclude that they provide good mana, nt summaria of the effectiveness of the programs at these faci ities.
I recommend that suc evaluations be per reed and reported, for all pending OLs. The e luations shou'd be pe ormed when construction is about six months from c letion with the result g report available about three months prior to i uance of a low power lic nse.
I suggest that tt report include as a minima the following elements:
Et luation of Significant Ce struction Deficiencies Ef ectiveness of 0A Program S
ry of SALP Review Resu s of Preoperational est Program Indepe nt Design Revi (whereapplicable)
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated DISTRIBUTION PRC System JLet:
^t,Licitra udsnighton TMNovak DGEisenhut HRDenton L8f3 Reading
- . See previous concurrence.
DL:LBf3*
DL:LBf3 DL:AD/L*
DL:DIR*
M EAlicitra/yt GWKnighton TMNovak DGEisenhu*
9/ /83 9/ /83 9/ /83 9/ /F3
ISORAIRM FOR: Richard C. DeYoung. Director office of Inspection and Enforcement FRM:
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of IInclear Reactor Regulation SWET CDIESTIWCTION GA EVALMATI0llS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN trERATIIs LICDISE l
At our request. Rest V provided us with the attached report for Palo i
Verde conceretag en ev41ustion of. (1) the significant construction the effectiveness of its co ruction deficiencies for this fabjltty and (2)lso attached, tras prepared or phase 0A program. A stellar report. a unterford 3 by Amsten IV. Re have reviamed the reports and r d that they provide good management hummertes of the effect1 of the programs at these facilities.
If you de est alree@ receive evaluations 1 plants, we reconuend that such evaluations he perforund, vaported, for all pending OLs. We request that the evaluettens he uljen construction is about six months from completten with the result Ftport available about thrwe months prior to issuance of a les power iconse.
We suggest that the report teclude a mi aum the'following elements:-
Evaluetten of gnificant tion Deficiencias Effectt of 44 program i
l Sumary e Revious Results Prosperettenal Test rem Design Ihvier (where app icable) i request.your 1 stance in this matter and are to meet with you i
to discuss it Harold R. Denton. Director Office of Nuclear Reacto Regulation leeures:
stated f.
c c
/
A N'\\
i
.g.y3
.j
+
.g..
..mg.....
j 9],[................gfj),,,,,,,,,,,
9/,h@],,,,,,,,,,9/,,,/@3 l
==>..i!/l./A3
..?l.t /83,,,,,,,,,
c o nseus m smom ano OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
DISTRIBUTION PRC System L8f3 Reading TNovak MLicitra GWKnighton JLee IWWRAlem FOR: Richard C. DeVoung. Director Office of Inspection and Enforce unt FRM:
Darrell G. Eteenhut. Director Division of Licensing Office of gluclear Reactor Regulation SW MCT:
C M STItsCTI M 0A EVALUATI0lls PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN OPERATIIS LICDISE At our regnest. Region V provided us with the attached report for Palo Verde eencoreing andevaluation of. (1) the significant construction deficienciesforthisfacilityand(2)theeffectivenessofitsconstruction phase 04 program. A sieller report, also attached. was prepared for Materford 3 by Regien IV. We have tuviamed the reports and conclude that tsuy provide good sisusaries of the effectiveness of the QA programs at these fact 11 ties.
4 3 aR Co.-
Me recomused that such evaluations he performed and reported for.eM.c m e L g
pending R3and request your assistance in es 1shing such a program with t
the Regions. The evaluettens should be performed when construction is about six months from esspletion with the resulting report available about three amatin prior to issuance of a low poner license.
i Me suggest that the report include as a minisua the following elements:
Evoluetten of Significant Construction Deficiencies Effectiveness of QA Program Scenery of SALP Reviews Results of Prosperational Test Program IndependentDesignReviou(uhereapplicable)
Me regnest your assistance in this metter and are prepared to meet with you to discuss it fierther.
Darrell G. Eisenhut. Director Division of Licensing Office of fluclear Reactor Regulation teclosurest i
.Ts stated
- c.,c.,. b n
n
. ( m.Lf gW"*.g pg,.....pE{s,;,hu,t,
...ot:Dut......
k ma =>
l emosomssetmansmousse OFFICIAL RECORD COPY m.-
f UIstTED STATES NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION
(...)
t maamsestoes, o.c.seems AUG 25 E i-
/. y %.w x
)
qj[,A I
IWWRAIEMt FOR: Richard C. DeYoung. Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement
./
i n
/
/ Iy
.j\\P I' '.;
), "
FIGt:
11 isen
. Director
/
)
ar Reactor Regulation )I sing 4pv of i Office of Itu SU8JEC':
C0llSTRUCTION 04 EVALUATIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN OPERATIIIG LICDISE At our request. Region V provided us with the attached report for Palo i
Verde concoming an evaluation of. (1) the significant construction
=
deficienciesforthisfacilityand(2)theeffectivenessofitsconstruction 4
phase QA program. A similar report, also attached, was pmpared for Waterford 3 Iqy Region IV. We have reviewed the reports and conclude that they provide
-ria* af the effectiveness of ty programs at these facilities.
ppg A recommend that such evaluatiI$ns be performed, and reported, for all n rt an: n;ttx: S = ' " tht ; : d : p g...T. with pending OLg:"76e e; valuations sheeW be performed when construction is about the4eftons.
six months cespletion with the resulting report available about three months to issuance of a low power. license.
We t that the report include as a minimum the following elements:
Evaluation of Significant Construction Deficiencies s
Effectiveness of QA Program
/
Summary of SALP haviews y
/
Results of Pmoperational Test Program Independent Design Review (where applicable) o We request your assistance in this matter and are prepared to meet with you to discuss it further.
i t
y& gg Darry Eisenhut. Director Divi i of Licensing j
%d Offi o Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclos*es:
[
t G
As stated g
i
, f\\. V b..
[
t:
w
h.L.cian.
untTaDsTArts NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMIS$lON
- * * *T*
- o r seems s
\\,.....
Thomas E.Murley. Regional Adminstrator Region !
IS ORANDUM FOR:
James P. U Reilly. Regional Administrator Region II James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator. Region III John T. Collins Regional Administrator Region IV John 8. Martin. Regional Administrator Region V Harold R. Denton Direh or [
FR04:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
$UBJECT:
CONSTRUCTION QA EVALUATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN OPERATING LICENSE
/
Recentley Regions II and V provided us mith the ports for OL facilities include an evaluation of. (11 the signific et construction which deficiencies for this facility and C2) the effectiteness of its construction A similar report. :also attached.\\was prepared for phase QA program.
I have reviewed these reports and conclude that Waterforil 3 by Region IV.
they provide good annagement summaries of the effectfreness of the programs at these facilities.
I recommend that such evaluations be performed and repg' rted for all pending OLs. The evaluations should be performed wheniconstruction is about six months from completion with the resulting report available about three assiths prior to issuance of a low power license.
l 1 suggest that the report include as a minimum the following elements:
I Evaluation of Significant construction Deficiencies
/
Effectiveness of QA Program ResultsofPreoperationalTestProgram/
Summary of SALP Review Independent Design Review (where applicable)
'N
/
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated 4
.r=*
____