ML20106G154

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Affidavit of R Yockey Re 820714 Meeting W/D Stiner,R Tolson & T Brandt.W/Supporting Info
ML20106G154
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 10/24/1984
From: Yockey R
BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.)
To:
References
NUDOCS 8410310068
Download: ML20106G154 (14)


Text

STATEMENT PLACE DATE: / ')4 - PY I, b umend [oches/ , hereby make the following voluntary statemeht to H. Brooks GIMFFIN Who has ider.tified himself to me as an Investigator with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. I make this eats or promises of reward having been made to me.

1e statement prevd Iyfreely e~ with no as thr,?%'}ed

+he Brw~ v &&

f~~r e y e s i s ~ p r , e rs.s~ e i s~e n i c e s e+ M C cna~ e I, e ,jc S%- s=/ee+ rte sh7%~ . I m Firef hired 7 ?fR.4o% bec M7K~ a s &

N aj d g ,,;a1 Goo?Ni ~'O-for%~ i wa+ +rn" R rr'd h m y prese~ ; fa,;+;en

. in if/wm ber /97f .

a ac., y'; -

/n

/W2 I o desdec/

b X(y!% i nbie 4 m e4 dec( s/gan, Row 75(sc~'s oFRe e. 77fson L% r (we Gher.

7%mes Brnodt, e d d. # :s m y a 79en-:Ata e e h aof repe,ted SY;<oe r oF he r-Alrs .

mee n g to as(v is e. is ces sidera,% of '

ap tien s employmen+ /M y jaarp eyx%

her  % L ate J de iia the mee ve top %c,igwns f reywapey.

m or e. ms a m e /c a s u re +Lt Bows y

/f%f a d v ise r +c

~

perse ne ( 7elizy wqs a ce u r a.fely expl aued h i A1rs . .C79per.  ?$b?bOEA*of$o85$s G pyg i'

NSN A NR

  • PUQ O PN SQgq L
/Cuoi 05 ecsome i prah/o~ u ,tt, im. ,

Stuer i hw I en ivo1 eumre a P 7t,e l cae / of D

s p c.; Fic , oF tu problem . .1 w,, , t,,

ande r +he im p m ias f fAe +~e ef +1,e

-f 4 s4 ,+1r s . s+;aer h aol same d ; % t ty mee-+in9 wifb her g re p uc.y.

tAest MIrs. 6% e r /N uire../ a lood I recu // 7 k i d'- e FP, ,

the fossi b;/i+y of her beimp v' For weyg^w's w.~ a~

So che wom{cl be e!igi/o/e t+ w a g exp>/aineJ A A'rs.

cenge~ u +;oo .

Miner [hck IN Wt vic/w{ Pmjo/oyee g w e re so4 "teof'et" ,mool ,%+ et A+ tim e 4he G A s<' epa rke~f wa s. hiri wg .

/11rc . S h er was given 7% /9rnwa v /%1 a re y aes.t fs e a ha ve poliey re 7acclis>7 coo k ue fa o?' qlogosce ~ hie G taom(c/

he r Ror is s u ro"c e loewe FNs.

paliFy hes a cc /ce cl c.n 7%e

&lo enpope l v> L o j

  • Sr d l** * + ^'*

Ye*r +c,

  • leav e cF e6uoce de //oer re peef a c L ; ici. Brown y GL+ er sc ~ue i reywsh a
a. Joe {er 's oefe. /is+ing p% e>pe efed clate j o F de 'i ve ry The P~plo yee is qlso regu;< ec/

.o fay one months M s u rmac e prem i, lN Y he lGMve of Gkvan c e f rio r

a lices ee.. The lope eu o r e c e t v e. up

+o sO ~~Ks emy/ea ueai+L od py -

aas t l

%is ceo he ex +ea deol. Yk e ey/o g, ms f co w ifL 0/l other e n~c/cjdes pte IF +ke y w is h 40 he- rv w~ s.ider ed R e enf byme~+ q F&er the be e- o f g kwsee.

the +/ ~1 e 41rs h er us g;,g

/rf an Ko F was est a of her optieas- i is xl- c o n gi ,-f e n-/ w iYk passi6 li+y. L+ ,i,v,tia,ct s, Bcous v Ros+ po t/ ~y +c eor N y c-e~ 7 a a //1 y f % r 2 2 8 "4 "d ise f a Alcs 5%er 's ergoaxe( nte om pasm !?so - kf~ V ~

rc Fleg +Aa+ she ta n + ~

Deeen her /.6 i M 8 2 ,

s+ Aer*}"ivp<est.I wn s proper , he ea ese slo ivo + be I:ev e- this Ans A ,y grown m be+ a I +:~de ty u saf,*ca, n ad inspee-fors nere heug

, gc n .,.,,

we 4

?n,wa re d f~ t h e- 47fm e of %e f

+Aere meeY/ a7 wif4 /nes. s % +r f 6 t had been c % ges is her wee k cdaties ,

W rn /vo4 aware o P a46 +4o.c a C kG ^>f PSLJ e i' F .

e $ OY Y foyeS .

b uc-ia my a fh ~olemee a+fk 01ee%g, 1 1 di Arof sifaesS 9"y aflemf i s Ay Ti~/ga.e '

x frandt +o latw;clete or A c:< r ass Arr.s.

S+;p ge . .r dc <o. + be l'iev e fh;g meefi.Ny w' y (c) +o en c.o are e ;r f r es s. a r e , o rpsuooe l pcg. St;asc +o enoe her emy ta'yvmen4 nith gm4 #6, .+. /Vty comexis ,g 7'e //rs.

Stiaec w e re. made osly fe a duis e her of her o Y did m+ +h na+ e~

or bc*s *p%"s /*7rs-. Sf/" er- A /5o /" oh 5 *'"S Stin er ed v.r-in fM me ehf i T ch <*f

& . sc.4ed or aff a t ecd dfsdrssed 3,7,., gh a as con W% b le - , e ,-<,

$ A*

  • f rc, v i c /cc/

1,h e X)8C 'N <Yy J m

J made sF & wkniis ge ix en o r as du sv .., , , ,

P (#A^'

p Q mge..-@ .

f a fl'c2 VICAE Y kc;U e O f }cf W fA r', l Al ,k,..m Y W XC t:f c% i f r a>. y s P G MPmory ss N g, f h$d (c) V I p c, . =; te. Fron D. A . Ecy ber+

x' gt;o e r her

'.s e4 sy / ment daled o ck>loer ofipp l

l

/ 0 /1 fr 2 I have read the foregoing statement consisting of k handwritten /

W pages. I have made and initialed any necessary corrections and have signed my name in ink in the margin of each page. I swear that the ,

foregoing statement is true and correct. Signed on /-)t/-f'l/at .

l (cate) (time) ,

1

( b 7[

(SIGNATU3E:/ TYPED DR PRlhiED)

Subscribed and , sworn to_before me this.

at

@L/~l'h day o 9 ,

INVESTIGATOR: WITNESS:

(NAME: TYPED' OR'F7 TINTED)~

"/ { p p ITLE: TYPED DR PRINILD)

Pu*

8 T

  • ma n*

dr W

.O E

M:

LaJ P

l i

l i

5

- ?

y 7-24-82 MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD Re: Darlene K. Steiner #G976 Ron Tolson, Tom Brandt and I met with Darlene Steiner, in Tolson's office at about 0900 hours0.0104 days <br />0.25 hours <br />0.00149 weeks <br />3.4245e-4 months <br />, this date. The purpose of this meeting was to ascertain her intentions regarding employment due to . and medical complications arising therefrom and to advise her of the options available to her.

She expressed concern for income if she were unemployed because her husband was also unemployed but had possibilities of em:loyment. She had been erroneously advised that a lay-off' would be possible which would enable her to receive unemployment compensation. Tnis is out of tne question as the OA function has been staffing up. It was also pointed out to her that one of the conditions imposed by law was that she be physically able and available for employment. Due to the restrictions placed on her by her doctor her type of work has been changed. The poss-ibility of further serious complications exist according to information she provided. Tolson expressed concern for her well being.

The option of requesting a leave of absence was discussed to include the fa~ct, approval of which, would permit her to keep her company Medical and Hospitalization insurance in force to cover medical expenses which under the circumstances could be well above normal for . She was advised by Yockey that if she elected the leave of absence, the admin-istrative requirements and that it would involve renoval f rom the payroll.

Since she expressed some intention of returning to work on the project when physically able to do so, she was also advised that she would have to reapply and be treated as any other rehire candidate.

There was no decision made at this meeting. She wished' to consult her husband and review his enployment situation before making any decision.

ay e cc: R. Tolson 8

l l

EX R g.)

l

WN N

!e C

w o.

I

e BROWN & ROOT,INC.

AND ASSOCIATED COMPANIES Dete; July 7,1978 ,

subsect:

AUTHORIZED LEAVE OF ABSENCE PURPOSE To provide a method for employees to receive service credit and continue participation in certain employee benefit Group insurance plans when they must leave the Company due to unusual circumstances usually beyond their control.

POLICY The Company may, subject to conditions of Corporate Policy, grant an employee an Authorized Lease of Absence when valid reasons exist. Such leave must be approved by tne concemed Manager anc appropriate Officer.

1. Leaves of absence ordinarily will not be granted for the employee to engage in other or self. employment except where such leaves of absence are granted due to a reduction of force, to return to school, or to be with husband or wife in another locality,
2. Leaves of absence will be granted for a period of six months or l'ess and generally will not be renewed except in unusual circumstances.
3. A leave of absence, or an extension thereof, proposed to be granted to any officer or employee who is a participant under the Career Executive incentive Stock Plan, the Halliburton Company Senior Executives' Int.entive Deferred

) Compensation Plan or the Brown & Root, Inc. and Associated Companies Officers' Supplemental Retirement Plan must be approved by the Executive Committee of the Company prior to.the granting of such leave of absence or extension thereof. All other leaves of absence must be approved by the chief executive officer of each respective operating group or by such other pe. son or committee whom he may designate for such purpose.

4. Executive Committee soproval of a leave of absence in accordance with policy paragraph 3 wi!I be immediately withdrawn at such time the employee accepts other employment or becomes self employed unless continuation of the leave of absence is authorized by the Executive Committee.

PROCEDURE h.5 zed _usves cLAbsence w- are interWiiif t0% . - .

- --- ' ise1oncenra service creditin5 tena iA E.T' m

in ce-tain.--employ 6E benem plans anE'should not crdinarilyh 1;iverrto ihose wTth*1e,ss than tweTv7e 721' months # E p n...n_ .- - -- -

credited service. Leaves are given for a period of no more than six (6) months. Extensions for up to six (6) months each may be authorized with executive management approval. Extensions are only given in unusuai cases.

4 Recuests for the approval of a leave of absence, or an extension thereof, for an officer or employee who is a participant under the Career Executive incentive Stock Plan, the Halliburton Company Senior Executives' incentive i

Deferred Compensation Plan or the Brown & Root, Inc. and Associated Companies Officers' Supplemental Retirement I

L m EXHIBIT

j ..- .

I -

  1. 4

. 1 2

POLICY 01 - 03 Page 2 P July 7,1978 b

Plan wi!! be submitted for approval in writing at least 45 days prior to the proposed effective date through appropriate organizational channels to the Office of the President of Brown & Root, Inc. Form " Request for Executive Committee Approval of Leave of Absence" will then be prepared and submitted to the Executive Committee of Halliburton Company. Notification of approval or rejection of such request will be given in writing on behalf of the Executive Committee and transmitted back through the organization channels to the concemed officer or employee.

. Valid reasons for Authorized Leaves of Absence are:

Reduction of Force Employees who are terminated because of reduction of force and a reassignment will not likely occur within 60 days of termination may apply for an Authorized Leave of Absence if they have twefve (12) or more months of credited service and they wish to maintain their group insurance benefits by making regular monthly premium payments. Employees terminated because of reduction of force who do .not receive an Authorized leave of Absence may extend their group insurance benefits for one additional month by payment of one month's premium following such termination.

An employee who participates in the Employee's Retirement and Savings Plan may apply for one (1) six (6) month extension to an Authorized leave of Absence. However, extensions are approved for reasor.s of reduction of force only in very unusual circumstances.

Personal lliness or incaoacity Employees who exhaust their sickness or accident benefits due to a continued illness or disability may apply for an Authorized Leave of Absence provided they have twelve (12) or more months 4f credited service. They may be eligible for one (1) extension of six (6) months.

Assionment to soecial duty outside Company at the Company's reouest Employees will be granted an Authorized Leave of Absence when they are loaned or assigned by the Company to other companies' activities, governmental agencies or institutions. In such cases the leave may be continued and extended as often as necessary at the Company's discretion with prope* approval.

Some urcent and necessary personal reasons Employees who have twelve or more months of credited service and are returning to school to continue an approved full time educational program, or are leaving the area to be with husband or wife in another locality, or to attend to matters beyond the employee's control, will be considered for an Authorized Lcave of Absence.

However, each such leave or extension thereof will be carefully evaluated by the employees concerned Manage >

ered Officer.

l

. i

  • . i POLICY 01 - 03 July 7,1973 Page 3 1

Military Absence Employees who enlist or are called for active military service are covered by special policy. " Absence due to Military Service " rather than by an Authorized Leave of Absence.

Termination Authorized Leave of Absence will be cancelled immediately under the following circumstances:

1. The emp:oyee returns to work.
2. The period of the Authorized Leave of Absence expires.

1 3. The reason for granting the Authorized Leave of absence no longer exists; such as, completion of urgent

, personal business or recovery from illness or incapacity. -

E 4 Refusal of an offer of reemployment in the same job or one of similar pay and status made to an empiovee t on Authorized Leave of Absence because of reduction of force.

NOTE: Administrative Procedures Section 11 A, Personne!,

Subject:

Form H 66. Termination intea<iew Suppiement "A" Application for Extension of Benefits and/or Leave of Absence.

I e

I B

Approved: Operating Comminee April 4,1978 O

B O

O e

T w

b m

Z

>c LaJ 4

6 e

e

  • i t.

7

~

EL owpifR:xt.br CONFIDENTIAL l INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: File DATE: October 14, 1982 FROM: D. K. Egbert -

SUBJECT:

Darlene Stiner This is to document the writer's October 12, 1982, discussions with Comanche Peak Project QA employee, Ms. Darlene Stiner.

Tne primary objective of the discussion was to advise Ms. Stiner of the

, she could expect to receive upon either acceoting a Reduction of Force (ROF) termination or applying for and subsequently receiving a formal leave of absence.

From the outset and through the entire discussion, Ms. Stiner appeared very pleased with the fact that someone was taking the time to explain her employee benefits and further appeared sincerely op.en to suggestions and genuinely in-terested in making a decision most ' beneficial tc her and her family.

In summary, the discussion with Ms. Stiner commenced with the undersigned identifying two (2) options available to her for maternity leave purposes.

The first option explained was that of a Reduction of Force (ROF) termination.

. The R0F was explained to Ms. Si.iner as being a lay-off with basically no lasting benefits other than having the ability to request one (1) additional month's hospitalization coverage. Ms. Stiner was also advised that with the coverage extension, she personally would be responsible for remitting the medical coverage premium to the Employee Benefits Department.

The second option explained to Ms. Stiner was that of a formal leave of absence (LOA), the LOA being a termination for .

a period of up to six (6) months (with an extension provision) with a primary benefit of having the ability to retain hospitalization coverage for that six (6) month period.

Inasmuch as the hospitalization coverage was specifically addressed and stressed, also explained was the fact that with an approved LOA, she would also be able to retain life insurance benefits, as well as her continuous service.

An approved LOA was further explained as not being an absolute guarantee that upon return from leave, Ms. Stiner would be rehired in her previous job assignment, or, in f act, rehired at all. .

At this point, Ms. Stiner interjected her perception of a LOA. That percetticr.

leave, she would be placed or

~

simply being that upon return from rehired in her previous position.

l l' The writer reiterated the provisions of the Brown & Root, Inc. LOA and again stressed the primary benefit of the LOA as allowing her the opportunity to reta:r benefits, such as hospitalization and life insurance coverage, as well as

' her continuous service, and further indicated that in terms of future employment, the LOA would only guarantee that Brown & Root would consider her l

EXHIBIT (-3

O

  • Brownf.TRoot.ine.

.. Darlene Stiner October 14, 1982 .

Page 2 for re-employment should a position be available and she qualified for that position. ,

Ms. Stiner was sdvised. that while on a LOA monthly premium payments were her sole responsibility.

During discussions relating to employee benefits, and specifically her medical coverage, Ms. Stiner stated her understanding of her medical benefit entitlements under any termination. Her understanding of her medical benefits were that since prior to her termination, that she would be of afforded total coverage for both her under the provision that .

were pre-existing condi tions.

The writer informed Ms. Stiner that fede-al law (passed some three (3) years ago) prevented employers from treating any differently from any other disease or condition; meaning that once! she was terminated for any reason and was not granted a LOA, then she, like any other employee, would not be afforded medical coverage benefits beyond the nonnal coverage expiration period. A hypothetical example of medical c_ overage expiration was discussed with Ms. Stiner. ,

Ms. Stiner was then advised of. her earned and accrued vacation entitlements upon termination. Specifically, Ms. Stiner was told that regardless of termination reason, she would be entitled to pay for the earned vacation not taken as well as pay for the. vacation accrued between her anniversary (or employment date) and date of termination.

Ms. Stiner was provided the formula (number of days between annt'versary date and date of termination x 10 (entitlement)+ 365 for calculating her accrued vacation. Ms. Stiner was also advised of Power Group Policy of rounding-up partial entitlement days to the next full day. A hypothetical example of accrued vacation pay-off was verbally discussed with Ms. Stiner.

Ms. Stiner queried the writer as to her eligibility to withdraw Retirement and Savings contributions while on a leave of absence. The writer responded 4

. by indicating that she could make application to withdraw employee contri-butions at any time, but indicated a lack of knowledge on application for company contribution withdrawal while on a leave of absence. On October 13, 1982, (day after discussion with Ms. Stiner) the writer contacted Mr. R.

Lo' san, Brown & Root, Inc. (Employee Benfits Manager) who stated that a leave of absence must be terminated before an employee could make application for or receive their vested percentage of company contribution entitlements.

Ms. Stiner was advised accordingly on October 13, 1982.

Ms. Stiner also inquired as to her eligibility to draw unemployment compensa-tion after a LOA termination. Again, the writer could not answer this question and told Ms. Stiner that her question would be posed to the Brown & Root unemployment claims representative and an answer would be provided.

.. . - - -. . - _ . . --~ . - - . _ _ . -

1

  • E: nynCTRootkxL O

Darlene Stiner ,

October 14, 1982 /

Page 3 ,

On October 13, 1982, the writer contacted the Unemployment ' Claims Department and was informed that upon LOA termination, Ms. Stiner could be eligible for unemployment compensation. Ms. Stiner was advised accordingly on October J 3, 1982. The Unemployment Claims Department telephone number (676-4838) was also provided Ms. Stiner for her information and future reference.

It is important- to note that during the discussions, Ms. Stiner indicated that she should contact him immediately within 25 minutes time.

With that, the writer thought it appropriate to request Ms. Stiner provide a written (return to work) release from her physjcian each and everytine she More specifically, Ms. Stiner was requested to provide a detailed release stating precisely what work activities her physician recommends should not be undertaken. Ms. Stir.er agr eed to this request. Because of the appa. rent potential for a rather rapid Ms. Stiner was also requested to provide her immediate supervisor and the Project QA Manager with the name and phone number of her attending physician should an emergency arise. Ms. Stiner agreed to this request.

At the close of the discussion, the writer requested the Project QA Manager's secretary obtain the latest employee benefit booklet, and provide that booklet to Ms. Stiner in order that she may review for herself the benefits afforded by Brown & Root, Inc. ,-

The writer then arranged for transportation for Ms. Stiner to the employee parking lot, thanked Ms. Stiner for her time, provided her a business card with telephone number, and told her to feel free to call should she have any questions or require additional details.

D. K. Egbert QA Administration Manager DKE:rk e

l I

..m._ . _ _ - , _ _ - . _ _ _ - _ _ , - . -