ML20004C581

Final Deficiency Rept Re Failure to Establish QA Program, Initially Submitted on 790212.Effects of Deficiencies Upon Safety of Plant Operations Do Not Meet Requirements of 10CFR50.55e or 10CFR21

ML20004C581
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	05/29/1981
From:	Mcgaughy J MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, AECM-81-171, NUDOCS 8106040296
Download: ML20004C581 (4)

Text

1 w =

0 MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

] '/4 }: Helping Build Mississippi e

addnMdel P. O. B O X 1640, J AC K S O N, MIS SIS SIP PI 3 9 2 05

1. $S[,,r"v7mD#

May 29, 1981 Office of Inspection & Enforcement j U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II i 101 Mariatta Street, N.W.

Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Attention: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director

SUBJECT:

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-416/417 File 0260/15525/15526 PRD-79/03, Final Report, Fr!

tC to Establish a QA Progray' s AECM-81/171 s '\

References:

1) AECM-79/20, 3/15/79

~

,/ h

2) AECM-79/57, 6/1/79

3) AECM-79/100, 9/5/79 -

'~ h k f'I QC jE gi f.. g

'fI

4) AECM-80/34, 1/31/80 O

>\t y, 3Wu $

5) AECM-80/117, 5/30/80 j

6) AECM-80/155, 7/14/80 'e 's

• 7 y, l

7) AECM-80/210, 9/8/80 'T '-

8) AECM-81/48, 1/30/81 ' h '.g'/

On February 12, 1979, Mississippi Power & Light Company notified Mr. J.

K. Rausch, of your office, of a Potentially Reportable Deficiency (PRD) at the Grand Gulf Nuclear St1 tion (CGNS) construction site. The deficiency concerns the failure of a General Electric subcontractor, I&SE, to establish and implement an approved quality assurance program for electrical work performed under GE Field Deviation Disposition Requests (FDDR) and Field Deviation Instructions (FDI).

Our evaluation has shown that the ef fects of the deficiencies upon safety of plant operations e2 not meet the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e) or 10CFR21.

Our most recent report (Reference 8) should have been titled Status Report No. 8 instead of Status Report No. 7. Our final report is attached.

30/'T s

/ /

S' 8106o40 N Member Middle South Utilities System

Mr. J. P. O'Reilly AECM-81/171 NRC Page 2 -

Per a telephone conversation with your Mr. Art Johnson on May 22, 1981, our Mr. T. E. Reaves, Jr. obtained an extension for filing this report from 5/22/81 to 5/29/81.

Yours truly, g g- J. P. McCaughy, Jr.

EWCast Attachment I

cc: Mr. N. L. Stampley Mr. R. B. McGehee Mr. T. B. Conner Mr. Victor Stallo, Director Office of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. C. B. Taylor South Miss. Electric Power Association

. P. O. Box 1589 Battiesburg, MS 39401 e

l l

1 l

1 e * '

Attachment to AECM-81/171 .

Page 1 of 1 FINAL REPORT FOR PRD-79/03

1. Description of the Defici . .cy_

This deficiency concerns the failure of General Electric Installation &

Service Engineering (GE-I&SE), a subcontractor of General Electric, to establish and implement an approved quality assurance program for electrical work performed under Field Deviation Disposition Requests (FDDRs3 and Field Deviation Instructions (FDIs).

II. Analysis of Safety Implications An approved quality assurance progrse was implemented, and a reinspectios of all previous work was made. Two discrepancies found as a result were ev.sluated for their effect on safety and were found not to meet the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e) or 10CFR Part 21.

III. Corrective Actions Taken

1. The GE-I&SE QA Manual was revised to incorporate electrical work performed by GE-I&SE, reviewed and implemented on February 16, 1979.

2. An inspection was ct. ducted of all GE-I&SE work prior to the manual issuance on February 16, 1979 to insure compliance with the current QA :tanual revisions. A review was made of all 55 FDpRs and all 111 FDIs originated and approved for implementation prior to February 16, 1979. The purpose of this review was to inspect all work performed by GE-I&SE prior to issuance of the applicable Quality Assurance Manual on February 16, 1979.

All 55 FDDRs were considered and only 4 required inspection. Of the 4 inspected, no discrepancies were found.

All 111 FDIs were considered and 96 were eliminated bocause they were (1) superceded or cancelled, (2) not issued for work prior to February 16,1979, or (3) previously inspected and documented. The remaining 10 were transmitted to the Constractor for inspection. The inspection revealed two discrepancies: A terminal board damaged on one corner apparently af ter delivery of equipment and the installation of an incorrect isolator in panel H13-P872. These two discrepancies were determined not to meet the requirement of 10CFR50.55(e).

i

bec: Dr. D. C. Gibbs Mr. D. C. Lucken e Mr. J. N. Ward Mr. R. L. Scott Mr. R. Trickovie Mr. J. W. Yelverton Mr. L. F. Dale Mr. C. K. McCoy Mr. T. H. Cloninger Mr. R. A. Ambrosino Mr. R. C. Fron i Mr. C. B. Rogers Mr. M. R. Williams Mr. L. E. Ruhland Mr. D. L. Hunt Mr. A. G. Wagner Mr. P. A. Taylor PRD File File 4

e

.l

.i I

l i

t 7