ML13330A130

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notifies That Date for Submittal of Info Re Analyses of Main Steam Line or Feedwater Line Break Assuming Early Initiation of Auxiliary Feedwater Flow Has Been Rescheduled for 801201.Ltr Re TMI Lessons Learned Requirement Mods Encl
ML13330A130
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 10/06/1980
From: Baskin K
Southern California Edison Co
To: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC-44652, TASK-15-02, TASK-15-05, TASK-15-2, TASK-15-5, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8010140326
Download: ML13330A130 (4)


Text

Southern California Edison Company P. 0. BOX 800 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 91770 K. P. BASKIN TELEPHONE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, October 6 1980 (213) 572-1401 SAFETY, AND LICENSING Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: D. M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Subject:

Docket No. 50-206 Automatic Initiation of Auxiliary Feedwater System San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1

References:

(1) D. G. Eisenhut letter to J. H. Drake dated November 15, 1979.

(2) D. L. Ziemann letter to J. H. Drake dated December 21, 1979.

(3) K. P. Baskin letter to D. G. Eisenhut dated January 16, 1980.

(4) K. P. Baskin letter to D. L. Ziemann dated April 29, 1980.

(5) IE Bulletin No. 80-04 dated February 8, 1980.

(6) H. L. Ottoson letter to R. H. Engelken dated May 19, 1980.

(7) J. G. Haynes letter to D. M. Crutchfield dated August 8, 1980. of Reference (1) provided an NRC staff request for information regarding the auxiliary feedwater system (AFWS) flow requirements at San Onofre Unit 1. Reference (2) provides an NRC staff request for information regarding the applicability of current analyses of a main steam line break or main feedwater line break assuming early initiation of auxiliary feedwater flow. In Reference (3) it was indicated that in order to supply the requested information, a complete re-analysis of the applicable transients and accidents would have to be performed and it was estimated that the information could be submitted by October 1, 1980. This same schedule was reiterated in Reference (4), and it was indicated that the design details for the automation of the AFWS would be submitted for NRC staff review by October 15, 1980.

Reference (5) was a request from the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement for information similar to that requested by Reference (2).

In Reference (6) it was indicated that the information requested in Reference (5) would be supplied by October 1, 1980 in conjunction with our submittal to the NRC staff of the results of the main steam line break re-analysis.

0140 I4

D. M. Crutchfield, Chief October 6, 1980 In Reference (7), the NRC staff was provided with information regarding the impact of the failure of the salt water cooling system on the design basis loss of coolant accident and the main steam line break accident. Included in Reference (7) was a committment to advise the NRC staff if the above discussed re-analyses, due October 1, 1980, would impact the information supplied in Reference (7).

The purpose.of this letter is to reschedule the date for submittal of the above discussed information which was to be supplied by October 1, 1980. A delay has resulted due to the repair work which is being done on the steam generators at San Onofre Unit 1. As a part of the analytical effort associated with the steam generator repairs, it was determined that the Reload Safety Evaluation for Cycle 8 would be impacted and it was necessary to perform re-analyses of the affected events. Therefore, it is expected that the requested information can be submitted by December 1, 1980. The design details for the automated auxiliary feedwater system will be provided by October 15, 1980 as indicated in Reference (4).

If you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact me.

Very truly yours, cc: R. H. Engelken (NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Region V)

Division of Reactor Operations Inspection (NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Washington, D.C.)

-A.*

October 6, 1980 TI MR. 0. K., NELSON.

SUB83ECT:

ACitional WI1 Infurmation Requirements San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

unit I The NRC staff hais requtesteo several items of informattion'regardi,, 1 the' modificat ions -which have resulted from the T.hI Lessons: Leaerned. tequir n-s, As previous~ly discussed with U. F.' Martinbyhoeth sitc oth Engineern icpines Is needed in order to respond to-the NRC by tho' committed Cajte.

&ach of the three Items of inforn jation is' d.isLussed; belw AUXILIARY FEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN DETAILS 8y letter, datedApril 29, 1980, It was indi-cated that th~e design dtailoof the. eutomatically initiated auxiliary feedw; Ter iystem (AFWS)v to be inistall~e.0 in Jariuax y,.1981l, would be priovici"d to thi4 NRG staff' by Optcber i5, 198 These design details shoulcsinclud6 the latest dirawings (CCN's icue)na funt onu q )scription. of trte system.

PJi~tse provide the requested Information by October '10, l9 4q, to Su POTV?

.50r~tts to the NRC by cAtober 15, 1980.

REA(.TOR COOLANT SY$TEM VENTING. DESIGN DETAILS

~

8y letter dated May 22, 1980 it~ was Indicated that the design details of the reac t or cuolant system vents would be provided to the NRC staff. by October 1 1980.

The NRC st-,ff has-teen Contacted and submittal'O this information has

been deferred to Octob-,er 15, 1980.'* Tha desigo ciatails shouilu inciuati the latist dxa~winV4 (CCN's included) pnd a functional description of the systemn.

P1j~se provide the requested inforg~ation byOctober.10, 19W to su pprt suibmittal to the NRC by Otbe 5 1980.

AUXILIARY FEEDWAT EE SYSTEM FLOW ANAL-Y5S The letter -from -R. Hi. Verbeck dated September 12 198P provided 'Flow

.capabill.Uelot'f th~e autq1ittd Auiliary Fpedwa,tr System (q.FWS)

t& Le

!:n6stelleO inh Janujary, 1981 unider counditions f of fmanfaedwater it~

"System)., I n o.Cder for, West inat ous!e.o conmplete ana-.ys is to metNRi.

Wnotration", requests, we need to provici AFWS flow, capabilities unde'r 1t"iof main *teamlire break (M$b) or main 'feeo~ebek(L)

AccordWn~ly, we, havte dentified he following pdoitlonal MAFWS flow analysis:

Oct. 6, 1980 I.

Case 1I MSLB outside containment.

Determine total flow to WGs

assunp, i tor-driven auxiliary feecwater purip feeding 3 SG s throuvgh 4 ICVs at '0 psig SU pressure.

2.,

Case, 2 -MSLb inside cc'ntainatent.

Determine t otJ tifow'to 3.SGIS througt! 4 FCV's at 50 pSig SG pressifre for:

-a. nmotor-driven pump only

b.

steaff-driven pup only

c.

both pumps ope rat ing.

3.

Cast 3 M FLB outsiae containment. Determine total fiow to ~

'"suqing motor-Oriven auxiliary feedwater pup feeding 2 "G!s St ps ig SG pressure and I euxllidry feedwat 4r line spiling' to atmo phere at 0 psig 4ssming. the 4 FCs eaifuy open.,,.

ea assuming auxiliary feedwater it isolated fromtc ra (operator, action to close 2 FCsi plig.uiiry feedwater line)

Thb onitnt with the NRC coanitteu submittal dt e (Decemb~er 1, i980) n Westinhouse need dates, please Provide the inf'ormation by October 150., 1960.

If-you have any questions or desire additional. information, please contqct me.

W*".MOODY RO/ WGVF;wvo Q0., F. Mar~tln E.

. Dnovn/. G. Flournoy R. V. Krieger/R. Ornelas U..'hendrikar 1A. 1. Kaneko R. H~. Vtirbeck K. M. Evans E Files