Letter Sequence RAI |
|---|
TAC:ME1081, Clarify Application of Setpoint Methodology for LSSS Functions (Approved, Closed) TAC:ME1082, Clarify Application of Setpoint Methodology for LSSS Functions (Approved, Closed) |
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance, Acceptance, Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
|
MONTHYEAR05000255/LER-2008-007-01, Potential Loss of a Safety Function Due to Non-Conservative Auxiliary Feedwater Trip Setpoints2009-01-21021 January 2009 Potential Loss of a Safety Function Due to Non-Conservative Auxiliary Feedwater Trip Setpoints Project stage: Request NRC 2009-0030, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate2009-04-0707 April 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Request ML0912505692009-04-0707 April 2009 Attachment 5 - Point Beach, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Licensing Report, Chapter 2, Section 2.5.8 Through Appendices Project stage: Request ML0910006472009-04-0808 April 2009 Transmittal of Background Information to Support License Amendment Request 261 Interconnection System Impact Study Project stage: Request NRC 2009-0058, Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request 241 Alternative Source Term2009-06-0101 June 2009 Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request 241 Alternative Source Term Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2009-0066, License Amendment Request 261 Supplement 1 Extended Power Uprate2009-06-17017 June 2009 License Amendment Request 261 Supplement 1 Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Supplement NRC 2009-0068, License Amendment Request 261 Supplement 2 Extended Power Uprate2009-06-17017 June 2009 License Amendment Request 261 Supplement 2 Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Supplement ML0917603382009-06-29029 June 2009 Deferral of the Extended Power Uprate Acceptance Review and Acceptance Review of the Auxiliary Feedwater Modifications and Non Conservative Setpoint Technical Specifications Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0921905632009-08-0606 August 2009 Extended Power Uprate and Alternate Source Term Review Planning Meeting Presentation Project stage: Request ML0922402982009-08-0606 August 2009 Extended Power Uprate and Alternate Source Term Review Planning Meeting Presentation (Handout 2) Project stage: Request ML0922500082009-08-25025 August 2009 Extended Power Uprate (EPU) Acceptance Review Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0923104542009-08-26026 August 2009 Request for Additional Information from Electrical Engineering Branch Regarding Auxiliary Feedwater Project stage: RAI ML0924305172009-08-31031 August 2009 Notice of Meeting on AFW Modifications, Questions to Be Discussed Project stage: Meeting L-2009-207, Units 1 & 2, Update to Decommissioning Funding Status and Financial Assurance Plan2009-09-11011 September 2009 Units 1 & 2, Update to Decommissioning Funding Status and Financial Assurance Plan Project stage: Request NRC 2009-0094, License Amendment Request 261 Extended Power Uprate Expedited Review Request2009-09-11011 September 2009 License Amendment Request 261 Extended Power Uprate Expedited Review Request Project stage: Request ML0923211842009-09-14014 September 2009 Meeting Summary, Meeting with FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC, on the Extended Power Uprate and Alternate Source Term Amendments Project stage: Meeting NRC 2009-0098, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information2009-09-25025 September 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2009-0108, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate Response to Acceptance Review Questions2009-10-0909 October 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate Response to Acceptance Review Questions Project stage: Request ML0928005432009-10-19019 October 2009 Nonacceptance with the Opportunity to Supplement Letter for Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Other ML0929305162009-10-22022 October 2009 Request for Additional Information from Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch Auxiliary Feedwater Modification Project stage: RAI ML0929308342009-10-22022 October 2009 Request for Additional Information from Balance of Plant Branch Auxiliary Feedwater Modification Project stage: RAI ML0929201272009-10-28028 October 2009 Summary of Meeting with FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC on the Auxiliary Feedwater Modification Amendment Project stage: Meeting ML0930205422009-11-0404 November 2009 Acceptance Review of Requested Licensing Action Regarding Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0930603312009-11-0505 November 2009 Request for Additional Information from Technical Specification Branch Non-conservative Setpoint Changes (TAC Nos. ME1083 & ME1084) Project stage: RAI ML0930603012009-11-0606 November 2009 Request for Additional Information from Technical Specifications Branch Regarding Auxiliary Feedwater Project stage: RAI NRC 2009-0114, Transmittal of Background Information to Support License Amendment Request 261 Final Interconnection System Impact Study2009-11-13013 November 2009 Transmittal of Background Information to Support License Amendment Request 261 Final Interconnection System Impact Study Project stage: Request ML0931402312009-11-16016 November 2009 Request for Additional Information from Balance of Plant Branch Regarding Main Feedwater Isolation Valves Project stage: RAI NRC 2009-0125, License Amendment Request 261 Re Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information on Auxiliary Feedwater System2009-11-20020 November 2009 License Amendment Request 261 Re Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information on Auxiliary Feedwater System Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2009-0123, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information for Calculation of the Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Low Suction Pressure Setpoint2009-11-20020 November 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information for Calculation of the Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Low Suction Pressure Setpoint Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2009-0116, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information2009-11-21021 November 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2009-0115, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information2009-11-21021 November 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information Project stage: Response to RAI ML0932400282009-11-24024 November 2009 Request for Additional Information from Reactor Systems Branch Regarding Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI NRC 2009-0124, License Amendment Request 261 Extended Power Uprate Response to Request for Additional Information2009-11-30030 November 2009 License Amendment Request 261 Extended Power Uprate Response to Request for Additional Information Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2009-0120, License Amendment Request 261, Supplement 3 Extended Power Uprate2009-12-0808 December 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Supplement 3 Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Supplement NRC 2009-0122, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information2009-12-16016 December 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2009-0128, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information2009-12-21021 December 2009 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Information Project stage: Response to RAI ML0935002032009-12-22022 December 2009 Request for Additional Information from Reactor Systems Branch EPU Expedited Portions Project stage: RAI NRC 2010-0003, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate Auxiliary Feedwater System Pipe Stress Analysis Information2010-01-0808 January 2010 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate Auxiliary Feedwater System Pipe Stress Analysis Information Project stage: Request ML1000800812010-01-13013 January 2010 Request for Additional Information from Balance of Plant Branch Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI NRC 2010-0005, License Amendment Request 261 Extended Power Uprate Response to Request for Additional Information2010-01-13013 January 2010 License Amendment Request 261 Extended Power Uprate Response to Request for Additional Information Project stage: Response to RAI ML1002500112010-01-22022 January 2010 Response Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request 261 Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Request NRC 2010-0013, License Amendment Request 264 - Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Requirements2010-01-27027 January 2010 License Amendment Request 264 - Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Requirements Project stage: Request ML1001203312010-02-0101 February 2010 Request for Additional Information from Electrical Engineering Branch Auxiliary Feedwater - Round 2 Project stage: RAI NRC 2010-0022, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate & Transmittal of Proposed Technical Specifications for Reactor Protection System & Engineered Safety Features Setpoints Not Associated with Extended Power Uprate2010-02-25025 February 2010 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate & Transmittal of Proposed Technical Specifications for Reactor Protection System & Engineered Safety Features Setpoints Not Associated with Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Request NRC 2010-0012, License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Lnformation2010-03-0303 March 2010 License Amendment Request 261, Extended Power Uprate, Response to Request for Additional Lnformation Project stage: Request ML1006803682010-03-10010 March 2010 Notice of Meeting with FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC, to Discuss the Alternative Source Term, Auxiliary Feedwater, and Extended Power Uprate Amendments Project stage: Meeting ML1007806102010-03-25025 March 2010 Request for Additional Information, Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI ML1007506852010-03-25025 March 2010 Request for Additional Information, Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI ML1008103682010-03-25025 March 2010 Request for Additional Information, Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI ML1007804772010-03-31031 March 2010 Request for Additional Information, Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI 2009-04-08
[Table View] |
Text
Requests for Additional Information Electrical Engineering Branch of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation re:
Auxiliary Feedwater Modification License Amendment Request Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 Docket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301 EEEB 1 Loads Operated by Contactors BACKGROUND: Manufacturers provide a minimum drop out and pick up voltage for their products. These are guaranteed values for the life of the product for specified conditions.
Typical value for drop out voltage is 75%-65% of rated control voltage and the pickup is 85%-
110% of rated voltage. The licensee verbally indicated that approximately 55% of nominal voltage was considered for contactor drop out.
A Please provide justification for using voltages outside the manufacturer's recommended voltage range for safety-related contactor drop out and pickup.
B. If the licensee is using values other than manufacturer provided data (e.g. bench tested values), then please provide assurance that the assumed pick up and drop out values will be consistent for all conditions for the life of the product and there are plant controlled procedures for replacement of each device that has been analyzed at a value different than manufacturer provided data.
As applicable, please provide sufficient information to offer reasonable assurance that the conditions specified above are satisfied.
C. Depending on the number of voltage excursions below and above the nominal voltage, the motor loads may stall and restart. The low voltage and overvoltage conditions result in higher current flow.
Please verify that the evaluation for heating effect on the thermal protective devices included the effects of heating during the voltage transient and residual heating prior to the excursion.
D. The low voltage results in dropping out contactors and loads that were operating prior to a large motor start. The licensee has indicated that loads are capable of restarting and operating to meet design basis requirements.
Please verify that the process fluid systems were evaluated for potential effects such as voiding and water hammer.
E. According to the licensee response dated August 9, 2010, the licensee states the worst-case total loading of the EDG occurs with one EDG supplying both units during a design basis event with a LOOP/LOCA on one unit coincident with a LOOP on the other unit. The licensee evaluated the loads dropped out during EDG voltage excursions and concluded that all loads will start as long as the ESFAS was present. This is applicable to the unit with the LOCA condition.
Please provide details for impact on the Unit associated with the LOOP only event.
EEEB 2 Motor-Operated Valves (MOVs)
The licensee evaluated the stroke time of MOVs as discussed in the example for SI-860 Valve:
An example is provided for the SI-860 valves (CS pump discharge valves) based on the logic above. The minimum voltage requirements for these valves to operate is 365 V and the required stroke time is less than or equal to 16.5 seconds. The valves design stroke time is 11.73 seconds. The CS valves actuate on a high-high containment pressure signal, and therefore, are a random load on the system. The voltage dropped below 365 V a total of 5 times during the load sequence for a maximum total of 3.6 seconds, which was conservatively rounded to 4.0 seconds. The valve stroke time of 11.73 seconds was added to stall time of 4.0 seconds to determine a total stroke time of 15.73 seconds. This provides a 0.77 second margin to the required stroke time of 16.5 seconds.
It should be noted that at rated voltage, the motor delivers rated torque and speed. With the decrease in applied voltage, the torque produced varies with speed, both the torque and speed decreases resulting in an increase in slip. This lower speed due to degraded voltage will result in increased heating as well as reduced efficiency. The immediate effect of the degraded voltage is the reduction of the net torque produced which in turn means that the motor may not produce the desired thrust to satisfy the safety-related operation of the actuator.
For the SI-860 valves in the example above, the evaluated margin of 0.77 second is relatively small. There are also several factors that can impact the MOV stroke time.
Please provide a response to the following:
A. Verify the minimum voltage required for the 11.73 second stroke time.
B. Verify that this stroke time is consistently repeatable in the plant configuration and is for worst case loading on the valve.
C. Verify that effects that can reduce the thrust delivered by the motor operator under high differential pressure and flow conditions in relation to the thrust delivered under no-load conditions was considered.
D. Verify that the reduction in torque/speed was evaluated as the EDG output voltage is reduced during the transient caused by large motor starts.
E. Verify that the deceleration and acceleration time for the motor operator was considered during every event that the terminal voltage dropped below 365V.
F. The CS valves are a random load on the system. Verify that the stroke time is not extended if the Hi-Hi containment pressure signal is coincident with the worst case motor start on the EDG, resulting in delaying the MOV actuation until the voltage recovers to an adequate value.
G. Verify that the uncertainties associated with the accuracy of the MOV diagnostic equipment, frictional variations due to plant maintenance/lubrication activities, etc. were considered.
H. If the MOV is controlled by a contactor, verify that the total stall time was based on longer of the two, the pick-up voltage of the contactor or the adequate voltage needed for motor to operate.
I. Based on the field setting, the absolute EDG frequency can be at the lower end of the allowable range e.g. 58Hz. Based on the lowest allowable frequency value, coupled with voltage/frequency excursions during motor starts, verify that the valve stroke time is within acceptable limits.
J. Explain why the 0.77 second stroke time margin is adequate for MOV SI-860 considering the above, and account for uncertainties.
K. Identify the most limiting component when fed from EDG A and confirm that all safety-related equipment has adequate voltage with sufficient margin to account for uncertainties.
EEEB 3 According to the PBNP FSAR, a 550 gallon "day tank" is located near each unit. An additional 550 gallon storage tank is located in the base of each of the Train A units. The licensee has eliminated a 10% additional requirement for EDG fuel oil storage in the day tanks associated with each EDG. The licensee stated that the 10% additional margin is a requirement for fuel oil calculation after the transfer pump has started. The licensee indicated that PBNP intends to maintain 120 minutes worth of fuel for EACH EDG in each day tank.
Please confirm that this information is accurate.