ML023090405
| ML023090405 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 11/01/2002 |
| From: | Pederson C Division of Reactor Safety III |
| To: | Skolds J Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| References | |
| IR-02-015 | |
| Download: ML023090405 (17) | |
See also: IR 05000237/2002015
Text
November 1, 2002
Mr. John L. Skolds, President
Exelon Nuclear
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
USNRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-237/02-15(DRS); 50-249/02-15(DRS)
Dear Mr. Skolds:
On October 4, 2002, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) completed an
inspection of the licensed operator requalification program at your Dresden Nuclear Power
Station, Units 2 and 3. The enclosed report presents the inspection findings which were
discussed with Mr. R. Hovey and other members of your staff on October 4, 2002.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and to
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed
personnel.
Your staff identified four apparent violations of USNRC requirements. Three of these apparent
violations involved the failure to ensure that licensed operators were examined in accordance
with the requalification program requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 a(1) and a(2). The fourth
apparent violation involved providing inaccurate information to the USNRC which resulted in the
renewal of an individuals license, an action that would not have been taken had the correct
information been provided. These findings, which involved USNRC licensed operator license
conditions, do not present an immediate safety concern because the conditions were corrected.
The failure of your staff to ensure that the Dresden licensed operators maintained their licenses
as required by USNRC regulations resulted in our having to issue 47 Notices of Enforcement
Discretion (NOED) letters to individual operators as well as seven additional letters to individual
operators who had not been in compliance with our regulations but had since returned to being
in compliance. The USNRC views the issuance of any NOED as a significant action and a
serious matter which should only be infrequently required. The need to issue 47 NOEDs leads
us to be very concerned with the oversight of your licensed operator requalification training
program. We are currently reviewing the circumstances surrounding these issues and will
provide the results of our review to you by separate correspondence when it is complete.
J. Skolds -2-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the USNRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter
and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the USNRC Public
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of USNRC's
document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the USNRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Cynthia D. Pederson, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249
Enclosure: Inspection Report 50-237/02-15(DRS);
50-249/02-15(DRS)
cc w/encl: Site Vice President - Dresden Nuclear Power Station
Dresden Nuclear Power Station Plant Manager
Regulatory Assurance Manager - Dresden
Chief Operating Officer
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services
Senior Vice President - Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Vice President - Mid-West Operations Support
Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
Director Licensing - Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Manager Licensing - Dresden and Quad Cities
Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Document Control Desk - Licensing
M. Aguilar, Assistant Attorney General
Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
J. Skolds -2-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the USNRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter
and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the USNRC Public
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of USNRC's
document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the USNRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Cynthia D. Pederson, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249
Enclosure: Inspection Report 50-237/02-15(DRS);
50-249/02-15(DRS)
cc w/encl: Site Vice President - Dresden Nuclear Power Station
Dresden Nuclear Power Station Plant Manager
Regulatory Assurance Manager - Dresden
Chief Operating Officer
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services
Senior Vice President - Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Vice President - Mid-West Operations Support
Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
Director Licensing - Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Manager Licensing - Dresden and Quad Cities
Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional
Operating Group
Document Control Desk - Licensing
M. Aguilar, Assistant Attorney General
Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
DOCUMENT NAME: G:DRS\ML023090405.wpd
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy
OFFICE RIII * RIII * RIII * RIII *
NAME CPhillips:aa/sd RLanksbury MRing RPaul
DATE 10/25/02 10/25/02 10/25/02 10/25/02
OFFICE RIII * RIII
NAME BClayton CPederson
DATE 10/15/02 11/01/02
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
J. Skolds -3-
ADAMS Distribution:
AJM
RidsNrrDipmIipb
GEG
DRC1
C. Ariano (hard copy)
DRPIII
DRSIII
PLB1
JRK1
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Docket Nos: 50-237; 50-249
Report No: 50-237/02-15(DRS); 50-249/02-15(DRS)
Licensee: Exelon Generation Company
Facility: Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3
Location: 6500 North Dresden Road
Morris, IL 60450
Dates: August 26 through October 4, 2002
Inspectors: Charles Phillips, Reactor Inspector
Dell McNeil, Reactor Inspector
Approved by: Cynthia D. Pederson, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000237-02-15(DRS), IR 05000249-02-15(DRS); Exelon Generation Company, LLC; on
08/26-30/02, Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 & 3. Licensed Operator Requalification.
Biennial baseline inspection of the Operator Requalification Program. The inspection was
conducted by two regional senior operations specialists. Four apparent violations of USNRC
requirements were identified for which the final risk significance remains to be determined at a
later date. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow,
Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP).
Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after
USNRC management review. The USNRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of
commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process,
Revision 3, dated July 2000.
A. Inspection Findings
Cornerstone: Mitigating Systems
To Be Determined. One apparent violation of USNRC requirements was identified by
the licensee. A comprehensive written examination for the 24 month requalification
period defined by the licensee as January 10, 2000, through January 4, 2002, was not
administered to the operators by the station training department personnel within the
time frame required by 10 CFR 55.59, causing 54 licensed operators to not be in
compliance with 10 CFR 55.53 (h) on January 5, 2002. This issue will be tracked as an
unresolved item pending USNRC review of the circumstances surrounding it.
To Be Determined. One apparent violation of USNRC requirements was identified by
the licensee. A comprehensive written examination for the 24 month requalification
period defined by the licensee as January 30, 1998, through January 30, 2000, was not
administered to the operators by the station training department personnel within the
time frame required by 10 CFR 55.59, causing 28 licensed operators to not be in
compliance with 10 CFR 55.53 (h) on January 31, 2000. This issue will be tracked as an
unresolved item pending USNRC review of the circumstances surrounding it.
To Be Determined. One apparent violation of USNRC requirements was identified
by the licensee. An operating examination for the calendar year 2001 was not
administered to the operators by the station training department personnel within the
time frame required by 10 CFR 55.59, causing 10 licensed operators to not be in
compliance with 10 CFR 55.53(h) on January 1, 2002. This issue will be tracked as an
unresolved item pending USNRC review of the circumstances surrounding it.
To Be Determined. One apparent violation of USNRC requirements was identified by
the licensee. The licensee provided inaccurate information to the USNRC in an operator
license renewal request. The USNRC approved the license renewal request based on
the inaccurate information that was provided. The license renewal request would not
have been granted with the correct information provided. This issue will be tracked as
an unresolved item pending USNRC review of the circumstances surrounding it.
2
REPORT DETAILS
1. REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Mitigating Systems
1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification (71111.11)
.1 Review of Operating History - Effectiveness of Operator Training
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the plants operating history from November 2000 through
August 2002, to assess whether the licensed operator requalification training program
had addressed operator performance deficiencies noted in the plant.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
.2 Requalification Examination Material
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the 2001 annual requalification operating and the 2002 written
examination material to evaluate the general quality, construction, operational validity,
and difficulty level. The inspectors also conducted reviews to verify that the examination
material (1) adequately sampled the items stated in 10 CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and
10 CFR Part 55.45; (2) adequately evaluated operators knowledge of abnormal and
emergency procedures; (3) incorporated probabilistic risk assessment insights; (4) was
consistent with the Licensed Operator Requalification Training program 2 year sample
plan; (5) incorporated system and component differences between Unit 2 and Unit 3;
and, (6) included previously identified operator performance deficiencies.
The inspectors also discussed various aspects of the examination development with
members of the licensees training staff.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
.3 Requalification Training Program Feedback Process
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors assessed the methods and effectiveness of the licensees processes
for revising and maintaining its licensed operator continuing training program up to date,
including the use of feedback from plant events and industry experience information.
The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel (operators, instructors, training
management, and operations management) and reviewed the applicable licensees
3
procedures. In addition, the inspectors reviewed Nuclear Oversight and
Self-Assessment Audits.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
.4 Remedial Training Program
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors assessed the adequacy and effectiveness of the remedial training
conducted since the previous annual requalification examinations and the training
planned for the current examination cycle to ensure that they addressed weaknesses in
licensed operator or crew performance identified during training and plant operations.
The inspectors reviewed remedial training procedures and individual remedial training
plans, and interviewed licensee personnel (operators, instructors, and training
management). In addition, the inspectors reviewed the current examination cycle
remediation packages for the written and operating examination failures to ensure that
remediation and subsequent re-evaluations were completed prior to returning individuals
to licensed duties.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
.5 Conformance with Operator License Conditions
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's program for maintaining active operator licenses
and ensuring the medical fitness of its licensed operators. The inspectors evaluated the
facility and individual operator licensees' conformance with the requirements of
b. Findings
(.1) Failure of the requalification training program to ensure that 54 licensed
operators took a written examination for the requalification period of January 10,
2000, through January 4, 2002, as required by 10 CFR 55.59
(a.) Introduction
The licensee identified an apparent violation, whose significance is yet to be
determined, involving the failure of requalification training program personnel to
ensure that licensed operators were examined in accordance with the
requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and (a)(2). This finding was characterized
as an unresolved item pending USNRC review of the circumstances surrounding
it.
4
(b.) Description
On July 1, 2002, the licensee identified that 54 licensed operators did not meet
the requalification examination requirements of 10 CFR 55.59. A comprehensive
written examination for the 24 month requalification period defined by the
licensee as January 10, 2000, through January 4, 2002, was not administered to
the operators by the station training department personnel within the time frame
required by 10 CFR 55.59 causing 54 licensed operators to not be in compliance
with 10 CFR 55.53 (h) on January 5, 2002. All licensed operators successfully
completed a comprehensive written examination by July 17, 2002. This issue
was documented in Condition Report (CR) 00113996.
(c.) Analysis
This issue represented a licensee performance deficiency because the failure to
administer the examinations in accordance with regulatory requirements resulted
in the operators being outside their license conditions. The significance of the
apparent violation was still under review at the conclusion of the inspection.
(d.) Enforcement
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 55.53, states, in part,
each license contains and is subject to the following conditions whether stated in
the license or not:
(h) The licensee shall complete a requalification program as described by
10 CFR §55.59.
Title 10 of the CFR, Part 55.59 states, in part, that each licensee shall...
(1) Successfully complete a requalification program developed by the facility
licensee that has been approved by the Commission. This program shall be
conducted for a continuous period not to exceed 24 months in duration.
(2) Pass a comprehensive requalification written examination and an annual
operating test.
The significance of the failure of requalification training program personnel to
ensure that licensed operators were examined in accordance with the
requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and (a)(2) required additional USNRC
management review and will remain an unresolved item until the completion of
that review (URI 50-237/249/02-15-01(DRS)). In addition, 47 Notice of
Enforcement Discretion (NOED) letters were sent to the individual operators that
were impacted by the examination scheduling. Seven additional letters were
sent to individuals that were not in compliance on January 5, 2002, but had taken
and passed a comprehensive written examination by the time the licensee
identified the problem. These letters were assigned tracking numbers NOED-02-
3-003 through NOED-02-3-56. The significance of 54 licensed operators being
5
unaware of their qualification status required additional USNRC management
review and will remain an unresolved item until completion of that review
(URI 50-237/249/02-15-02(DRS)).
(.2) Failure of requalification training program to ensure that 28 licensed operators
took a written examination for the requalification period of January 30, 1998,
through January 30, 2000, as required by 10 CFR 55.59
(a.) Introduction
The licensee identified an apparent violation, whose significance is yet to be
determined, involving the failure of requalification training program personnel
to ensure that licensed operators were examined in accordance with the
requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and (a)(2). This finding was characterized
as an unresolved item pending USNRC review of the circumstances surrounding
it.
(b.) Discussion
On July 31, 2002, the licensee identified that 28 licensed operators did not meet
the requalification examination requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and (a)(2).
A comprehensive written examination for the 24 month requalification period
defined by the licensee as January 30, 1998, through January 30, 2000, was not
administered to the operators by the station training department personnel within
the time frame required by 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and (a)(2), causing 28 licensed
operators to not be in compliance with 10 CFR 55.53 (h) on January 31, 2000.
All licensed operators successfully completed a comprehensive written
examination by February 21, 2000. This issue was documented in CR
00117708.
(c.) Analysis
This issue represented a licensee performance deficiency because the failure to
administer the examinations in accordance with regulatory requirements resulted
in 28 operators being outside their license conditions. The significance of the
apparent violation was still under review at the conclusion of the inspection.
(d.) Enforcement
Title 10 of the CFR, Part 55.53 states, in part, each license contains and is
subject to the following conditions whether stated in the license or not:
(h) The licensee shall complete a requalification program as described by
Title 10 of the CFR, Part 55.59 states, in part, that each licensee shall...
6
(1) Successfully complete a requalification program developed by the facility
licensee that has been approved by the Commission. This program shall be
conducted for a continuous period not to exceed 24 months in duration.
(2) Pass a comprehensive requalification written examination and an annual
operating test.
The significance of the failure of requalification training program personnel to
ensure that licensed operators were examined in accordance with the
requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and (a)(2) required additional USNRC
management review and will remain an unresolved item until the completion of
that review (URI 50-237/249/02-15-03(DRS)).
(.3) Failure of requalification training program to ensure that 10 licensed operators
took an annual operating test during the 2001 calendar year
(a.) Introduction
The licensee identified an apparent violation, whose significance is yet to be
determined, involving the failure of requalification training program personnel
to ensure that licensed operators were examined in accordance with the
requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and (a)(2). This finding was characterized
as an unresolved item pending USNRC review of the circumstances surrounding
it.
(b.) Discussion
On August 25, 2002, the licensee identified that 10 licensed operators did not
meet the requalification examination requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and
(a)(2). An annual operating test was not administered to 10 licensed operators
during calendar year 2001. The 10 licensed operators successfully completed an
operating test on January 4, 2002. This issue was documented in
CR 00120517.
(c.) Analysis
This issue represented a licensee performance deficiency because the failure to
administer the examinations in accordance with regulatory requirements resulted
in the operators being outside their license conditions. The significance of the
apparent violation was still under review at the conclusion of the inspection.
(d.) Enforcement
Title 10 of the CFR, Part 55.53 states, in part, each license contains and is
subject to the following conditions whether stated in the license or not:
(h) The licensee shall complete a requalification program as described by
7
Title 10 of the CFR, Part 55.59 states, in part, that each licensee shall...
(1) Successfully complete a requalification program developed by the facility
licensee that has been approved by the Commission. This program shall be
conducted for a continuous period not to exceed 24 months in duration.
(2) Pass a comprehensive requalification written examination and an annual
operating test.
The significance of the failure of requalification training program personnel to
ensure that licensed operators were examined in accordance with the
requirements of 10 CFR 55.59 (a)(1) and (a)(2) required additional USNRC
management review and will remain an unresolved item until the completion of
that review (URI 50-237/249/02-15-04(DRS)).
(.4) Operator license renewal request contained inaccurate information
(a.) Introduction
The licensee identified an apparent violation whose significance is yet to be
determined involving the licensees failure to ensure that information provided to
the USNRC for the purposes of individual operator license renewal was accurate.
This finding was characterized as an unresolved item pending USNRC review of
the circumstances surrounding it.
(b.) Discussion
On March 5, 2002, the licensee submitted a USNRC Form-398 that contained
inaccurate information. The Form-398 was submitted to request an operator
license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 55.55. The Form-398 stated that the
operator for whom the license renewal was requested had an up to date
requalification status. The license was renewed on March 7, 2002. The
expiration date of the previous license was March 12, 2002. The operator was
one of the 54 operators whose requalification training license conditions had
expired on January 5, 2002, as discussed in Paragraph 1R11,.5,b,(.1). The
licensed operator was removed from licensed duties by the facility licensee on
July 12, 2002 until July 25, 2002. A new Form-398 was approved and the
license was correctly renewed. This issue was documented in CR 00115289.
(c.) Analysis
This issue represented a licensee performance deficiency because the failure to
provide accurate information to the USNRC resulted in a renewal of an operator
license that would not have been renewed had the correct information been
provided. The significance of the apparent violation was still under review at the
conclusion of the inspection.
(d.) Enforcement
8
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 55.9 states, information
provided to the Commission by an applicant for a license or by a licensee or
information required by statute or by the Commission's regulations, orders, or
license conditions to be maintained by the applicant or the licensee shall be
complete and accurate in all material respects.
The significance of the licensees failure to ensure that correct information
was provided to the USNRC in order to approve a license renewal in
accordance with 10 CFR 55.9 required additional USNRC management
review and will remain an unresolved item until the completion of that review
(URI 50-237/249/02-15-05(DRS)).
40A6 Meetings
.1 Exit Meeting
The inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. Hovey and other members
of licensee management and staff on October 4, 2002. The licensee acknowledged the
information and findings presented. No proprietary information was identified by the
licensee.
.2 Interim Exit Meetings
An Interim exit for this inspection was conducted with Mr. Hovey on August 30, 2002.
9
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee
B. Hovey, Site Vice President
D. Bost, Station Director
C. Barajas, Senior Reactor Operator
R. Coon, Training Director, Exelon Midwest Operating Group
J. Doyle, Reactor Operator
S. Foley, Operations Training Staff
B. Grant, Operations Staff
J. Griffin, Operations Training Staff
J. Hansen, Regulatory Assurance Manager
J. Heck, Operations Training Staff
J. Henry, Operations Director
C. Kent, Engineering Staff
J. Lindsey, Licensed Operator Requalification Training Lead
M. McDonald, Operations Director Exelon Midwest Operating Group
D. Ragan, Reactor Operator
M. Roether, Reactor Operator
R. Ruffin, Regulatory Assurance - NRC Coordinator
J. Sipek, Nuclear Oversight Director
C. Symonds, Training Director
S. Vercelli, Electrical Maintenance Manager
R. Wegner, Training Manager, Exelon Midwest Operating Group
NRC
M. Ring, Chief, Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 1
D. Smith, Dresden Senior Resident Inspector
B. Dickson, Dresden Resident Inspector
D. Pelton, Acting Chief, Division of Reactor Safety, Operations Branch
10
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened
50-237/249/02-01 Failure of the requalification training program to ensure that 54 licensed
operators took a written examination for the requalification period of
January 10, 2000, through January 4, 2002, as required by 10 CFR 55.59
50-237/249/02-02 Notice of Enforcement Discretion Letters were issued to 54 individual
licensed operators
50-237/249/02-03 Failure of the requalification training program to ensure that 28 licensed
operators took a written examination for the requalification period of
January 30, 1998, through January 30, 2000, as required by 10 CFR
55.59
50-237/249/02-04 Failure of the requalification training program to ensure that 10 licensed
operators took an annual operating test in accordance with 10 CFR 55.59
50-237/249/02-05 Operator license renewal request contained inaccurate information.
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CR Condition Report
DRS Division of Reactor Safety
LER Licensee Event Report
LORT Licensed Operator Requalification Training
NOED Notice of Enforcement Discretion
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
SDP Significance Determination Process
URI Unresolved Item
USNRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
11
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
1R11 Biennial Operator Requalification Inspection
50-237/249-00-13 Dresden Nuclear Power Station October 20, 2000
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-00-16 Dresden Nuclear Power Station December 14, 2000
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-00-21 Dresden Nuclear Power Station January 29, 2001
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-01-03 Dresden Nuclear Power Station March 5, 2001
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-01-13 Dresden Nuclear Power Station July 26, 2001
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-01-15 Dresden Nuclear Power Station September 9, 2001
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-01-16 Dresden Nuclear Power Station August 24, 2001
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-01-17 Dresden Nuclear Power Station October 19, 2001
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-01-19 Dresden Nuclear Power Station December 6, 2001
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-01-20 Dresden Nuclear Power Station January 18, 2002
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-02-03 Dresden Nuclear Power Station March 8, 2002
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-02-04 Dresden Nuclear Power Station April 26, 2002
USNRC Inspection Report
50-237/249-02-08 Dresden Nuclear Power Station July 30, 2000
USNRC Inspection Report
LER 050-249/2002-001 High Pressure Coolant Injection Not May 22, 2002
in Standby Operation When
Required by the Technical
Specifications
LER 050-249/2001-002 Reactor Scram Due to Reactor June 26, 2002
Recirculation Run-up and Trip
LER 050-249/2001-003 Reactor Scram Due to Increasing September 4, 2001
Drywell Pressure
12
LER 050-249/2002-001 High Pressure Coolant Injection Not May 22, 2002
in Standby Operation When
Required by the Technical
Specifications
LER 050-237/2001-005 Unit 2 Scram Due to Increased First January 7, 2001
Stage Turbine pressure
LER 050-237/2000-005 Recirculation Loop Temperature December 1, 2000
Failure Causes Shutdown Cooling
Inoperability
LS-AA-126 Dresden 2002 LORT Revision 0
Self-Assessment Report
Dresden 2000 LORT September 5-8, 2000
Self-Assessment Report
LORT Long Range Training Plan Revision 4
2000-2001
LORT Long Range Training Plan Revision 0
2002-2003
NOA-DR-02-1Q Nuclear Oversight Continuous April 26, 2002
Assessment Report - Dresden
Station January-March, 2002
NOA-DR-00-4Q Nuclear Oversight Continuous January 25, 2001
Assessment Report - Dresden
Station October-December, 2000
Medical Records For 10 Randomly Multiple
Selected Licensed Operators
TQ-AA-106 Licensed Operator Requal Training Revision 1
Program
TQ-AA-106 Licensed Operator Requal Training Revision 0
Program
TQ-AA-106-0304 Licensed Operator Requal Training Revision 0
Examination Development Job Aid
Root Cause Report 54 Licensed Operators at Dresden July 18, 2002
Station Failed to Meet License
Requalification Requirements in
Accordance with 10 CFR 55.59 Due
to Organizational Weaknesses,
Knowledge Deficiencies, and
Individual Inappropriate Actions
13
LER 050-249/2002-001 High Pressure Coolant Injection Not May 22, 2002
in Standby Operation When
Required by the Technical
Specifications
Condition Report 00117708 28 or 59 License Examinations for July 31, 2002
1998-2000 did not meet NUREG
1221 Requirements
Condition Report 00120517 Licensed Operator 2001 Annual August 25, 2002
Examination Requirements Not Met
Condition Report 00113996 Licensed Operator Biennial July 1, 2002
Examination not In Accordance With
NUREG-1021 Requirements
Condition Report 00115289 NRC 398's Submitted In Error July 11, 2002
NRC FORM 398 Personal Qualification Statement - March 6, 2002
Licensee (Alan Zlomie)
Written Examination Written examination written for June/July 2002
June/July 2002 examination
(6 written examinations)
OP-AA-105-102 Active License Tracking Log Revision 2
(various for multiple operators)
TQ-AA-210-4101 Remedial Training Notification and Revision 0
Action of Failure (Various for
Multiple Operators)
14