IR 05000483/1997002

Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-483/97-02 (Ref 10CFR73.21) on 970106-10.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Physical Security Program

ML20247G986
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	01/31/1997
From:	Murray B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247G973	List: IR 05000483/1997002 ML20247G967
References
50-483-97-02, 50-483-97-2, NUDOCS 9805210036
Download: ML20247G986 (4)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ __ __ ___ ____ - _ - _ _ __ ._ _

-

.

SS:PSB E C:PSB E D:DRP N D:DRS N l DWSchaefer BMMurray JEDyer TPGwynn i 01/23/97 01/30/97 01/31/97 01/31/97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY ENCLOSURE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket No.: 50-483 License No.: NPF-30 Report No.: 50-483/97-02 Licensee: Union Electric Company Facility: Callaway Plant Location: Junction Hwy. CC and Hwy. O Fulton, Missouri Dates: January 6-10,1997 Inspector: D. W. Schaefer, Security Specialist Plant Support Branch Approved By: Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Attachment: Supplemental Information DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED 9805210036 970131 PDR ADOCK 05000483 G PDR

. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

,

I I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

.

Callaway Plant NRC Inspection Report 50-483/97-02 This routine, announced inspection focused on the licensee's physical security ,

I

'

program. The areas inspected included review of commitments in the updated final safety analysis report, records and reports, testing and maintenance, physical barriers -

vital areas, detection aids - protected area, detection aids - vital areas, compensatory measures, personnel training and qualification, and review of previous inspection finding Enaineerino

- The Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) was consistent with the observed plant physical security plan and procedures (Section E2).

l Plant Sucoort t

- A very good records and reports program was in place. The security staff was l correctly reporting security. events (Section S1.1). i

)

- A very good testing and maintenance program was being conducted and was properly documented. A weakness was identified concerning entry turnstiles (Section S2.1).

- Proper vital area barriers and detection system were in place that would i l

' effectively delay and detect a penetration attempt. The vital area barriers and l j l detection system properly limited access to sly authorized personnel (Section S2.2).

- A very good perimeter detection system was properly maintained and tested l (Section S2.3).

l DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

_ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -

. .

. . .

.

.

-3-

-

The compensatory measures program was effectively implemented. Security

'

personnel were well trained on the program requirements (Section S4.1).

-

An effective security training program had been implemented. Medical examinations for security officers were thorough and well documented (Section SS.1).

-

A non-cited violation was identified for failing to maintain minimum illumination levels in outdoor plant areas (Section S7.1).

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

- _ _ _ _ - _

s

.

l I

WARNING; REVIEWED BY:

SECTION 147 ATOMIC ENERGY ACT 195 VIOLATIONS OF THE PROTECTION (NAME) (SIGNATURE)

REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 73.21 SUBJECT TO CIVIL OR CRIMINAL (ORGANIZATION) (DATE)

SANCTION .

I I

i

!

l

!

<

,

i

l j

!

i

I i I

]