IR 05000423/1985058

Preoperational Security Program Review Insp Rept 50-423/85-58 on 850930-1004.Major Areas Inspected:Proposed Consolidated Site Physical Security Plan & Implementing Procedures.Portions Deleted (Ref 10CFR2.790)

ML20137D647
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	01/09/1986
From:	Keimig R, Madden W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137D610	List: IR 05000423/1985058 ML20137D605
References
50-423-85-58, IEB-76-16, IEB-77-08, IEB-77-8, NUDOCS 8601170055
Download: ML20137D647 (5)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:-

. .

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /85-58 Docket N License N CPPR-113 Licensee: Northeast Nuclear Energy Company _ _ _ _ _ P.O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Facility Name: Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3 Inspection At: Waterford, Connecticut Inspection Conducted: September 30 - October 4, 1985 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: August 5 - 8, 1985 Type of Inspection: Preoperational Security Program Review

 ,

Inspector: [A b / - 9 - #4

 "Wfiliam J. Madden, Physical Security Inspector date
-

Approved by: / /-9-84 R y eimig,fhief, [f date Mafeguards Mction,MRS&S Inspection Summary: Preoperational Security Program Review on September 30 - October 4, 1985 (Inspection Report No. 50-423/85-58).

Areas Reviewed: Progress in the development of the Site Physical Security Program to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, including a review of the proposed consolidated site Physical Security Plan and implementing procedures, and the status of systems and equipment installation, and manning. The review involved a total of 32 hours onsite by one region-based inspecto Results: Development and implementation of the licensee's site physical security plan are progressing as schedule gon ApocM0 %

-

. .

DETAILS I persons Contacted ( _NUSC0/NNECO)

K. Burton, Operations Supervisor K. Gray, QA Staff Assistant

*L. Nadeau, Assistant Project Engineer S. Orefice, Project Engineer
*N. Tasker, Director, Systems Security
*R. Asafayo, Quality Services Supervisor
*M. Clark, Startup Engineer
*P. Weekly, Security Supervisor
*M. Griffin, Security Agent NRC
*T. Rebelowski, Senior Resident Inspector
*F. Casella, Resident Inspector C. Gaskins, NMSS Physical Security Licensing Reviewer
* Denotes those present at Exit Intervie The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the contract security organizatio . 30703 - Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives indicated in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the review on October 4,1985. At that time, the purpose and scope of the review and the progress of security related matters were discusse At no time during this review was written material provided to the li-censee by the inspecto . MC92701 - Follow-up on Inspection Items (IFI's) (Closed) IFI (50-423/85-09-05) - Expansion of Contract Guardforc The inspector confirmed by review of documentation, observation and discussions with licensee management that manning of the contract security organization continues to increase to accommodate the inclusion of Unit 3 into the site security progra (Closed) IFI (50-423/85-09-10) - Keys, Combinations and Locking Hardware. The inspector confirmed by review of purchase requisitions 7112 and 002620d, dated May 28, 1985 and September 23, 1985, respectively, and an inventory verification of the keys and locks in secure storage on October 2,1985, that the licensee procured sufficient high-security cylindrical and padlock type locks to meet Unit 3 needs as required by paragraph 6.9.1 of the proposed security pla . .

The inspector also confirmed that the requirements contained in NRC IE Bulletin 77-08, " Assurance of Safety and Safeguards During an

'

Emergency-Locking Systems", dated December 28, 1977, were addressed including:

  +
 '
    ' THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS 2.790(d)

INFORMATION AUD IS NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. IT IS

  ,   INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAN i c .- (Closed) IFI (50-423/85-09-16) - Access Control of Personne (1) Screening Program - The inspector confirmed that the licensee's screening program for authorizing both site protected and vital
 ,

area access was consistent with Chapter 6, " Access Controls",

-   of the proposed security plan, paragraphs 4.3 (1), (2) and (3)
 '(N ,

ANSI N18.17, " Industrial Security for Nuclear Plants" and NRC 4 ' IE Bulletin 79-16, " Vital Area Access Controls". The inspector

,   reviewed the requirements contained in the security plan, held-t
  { ^ discussions with both supervisory and administrative personnel 3 and reviewed samples of both company and contractor employees background investigations or certifications of three continuous
'

i 5 years of trustworthy employment. Twenty personnel screening files of badged personnel were randomly selected, reviewed and found'in conformance with the proposed security plan. The in-

spectcr 'also observed, on a daily basis, that psychological ex-

  -

aminstions were being administered to applicants for

   , employment. The inspector also observed on October 3,1985 the
,

Treferral of applicants for examination by a company retained _ s ' psychologist in cases where the psychological examination

  ,

reIult required professional reconciliatio .- .

  *

i

  '
 'i  '

s .THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS 2.790(d)

 --g   - INF0PMATION AND IS NOT FOR
.'
 +[ 's '

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. IT IS

 \    T'l ENTI0I; ALLY LEFT BL *J! ; ,,
  (2) Key Cards - The inspector also confirmed that the licensee had a total of 6000 new key cards in a security inventory to be issued upon implementation of Unit No. 3 Protected / Vital Area Access

. . .
  - - - .,
..E.,
 .
       ,

m,

 '

I ;j s

     '
.

l( f

     . Controls. Changeout of chips in microprocessing equipment for
  >

the new system was scheduled for November 9, -1985. The inspec-

     ~
.,"

I

     ' tor observed testing of the computer based access control systera for card key operations on October 2,1985. Both
     - protected-area card-key operated turnstiles and vital area
     . card-key operated doors were tested successfully. A total of M,      eight (8). turnstiles and 10 vital area portals were teste a-
   ,,,

E ' I

    - -(3) Detectors Q, .' ,

gN " - THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS 2.790(d) s ,.4? - INFORMATION AND IS NOT FOR

  .j%
  .  ;'   PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. IT IS
   -

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAN ,

  - 5.,- +%4 s ~*

_

    \. Searches c

THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS 2.790(d) r .

INFORMATION AND IS NOT FOR

' '

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. IT IS

   ^

T'r:NTIONALLY LEFT "' ' ; 1 . (qlt

& .
 %y ' .i f s% . L';
 -

u [[

~

V

  , (Closed)-IFI (50-423/85-09-17) - Access Control of Packages. The
    ' inspector confirmed, by review of procedures and tests of x-ray ( "'-

scanners, that the licensee processes and searches exempt bulk products and non-exempt packages and materials into plant protected f . area environs in' accordance with the requirements of paragraph of the proposed security pla ~ p; . .. ;A ) W:

.
           ,
%  p   .f- THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS 2.790(d)

s ' I .. . INFORMATION AND IS NOT FOR

*
 . in 53 \     P I "UBLIC DISCLOSUR [   ,    ' .IIIONALLY LEFT BLANK. IT IS
  '

4' All . test results were satisfactory. The inspector also reviewed ,

 ;y   licensee acceptance testing documentation including one deficiency
: w  v   report. The deficient equipment was corrected on June 12, 198 '

4

    -.

F--F-Y

       ~ -
        " ' " ' * " " ' *""'T 'T ~ 7 N'  ' 

y 1 -- - s...

.

 ~
-
 . .(Closed) IFI'(50-423/85-09-21) - Establishment of Alarm Station . The Unit 3 Central and Secondary Alarm Stations (CAS-SAS) have been constructed!and outfitted as described in the proposed security E  pla THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS 2.700(d)

INFORMATION AND IS NOT FOR PUBLIC DIFOLoSURE. IT IS INTENTI0' ALLY LEFT BLAN The_ inspector confirmed that the equipment mentioned above passed its acceptance testing and was on-line. The inspector observed demonstrations of alarm and problem data being communicated between the fielo and host CPU's and confirmed the adequacy of the connunications links and operator controls. The inspector sampled

    -
,

transactional history on October 3,1985 and found the system to be reliable.- THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS 2 790(d) , ce INFORMATION AND IS NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. IT IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAN The inspector confirmed that both the design layout of the Unit N CAS and SAS facilities and equipment meet the requirements of

 ' Chapter 8 of the proposed security pla 

}}