IR 05000413/1986010

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-413/86-10 & 50-414/86-13 on 860210-13 & 26-28. No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Review of Startup Test Procedures,Witnessing Initial Fuel Load & Review of Surveillance Tests
ML20199K903
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/27/1986
From: Burnett P, Jape F, Mathis J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20199K891 List:
References
50-413-86-10, 50-414-86-13, NUDOCS 8604100251
Download: ML20199K903 (6)


Text

i

,

p uc UNITED STATES oq'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/

p/

REGION ll

[\\

f 'nj 101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.

3,,

  • '

t

, ATL ANT A, GEORGI A 30323

,

%..v /

...

Report Nos.:

50-413/86-10 and 50-414/86-13 Licensee:

Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Docket Nos.:

50-413 and 50-414 License Nos.:

NPF-35 and NPF-48 Facility Name: Catawba 1 and 2 Inspection C ucted:

February 10 - 13 and 26 - 28, 1986 Inspectors

,[.O-dhn 3!2786 T. Bur'nett '

Date' Signed

'

. k-

'W 3 26 BA J.1[L. Mathis '

Date Sign ~ed Accompanying Personnel: A. R. Long Approved by:

&

F. Jape, Section Chief (/ f Oate Signed Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety l

SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 84 inspector-hours on site inspecting in the areas of review of startup test procedures, witnessing initial fuel load (Unit 2), and review of surveillance tests.

Results:

No violations or deviations were identified.

!

!

I 86041002S1 860402 gDR ADOCK0500g3

-

. _..

_

i

,

,

!

REPORT DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • J. W. Hampton, Station Manager
  • H. B. Barron, Superintendent of Operations
  • W. F. Beaver, Performance Engineer
  • W. H. Bradley, QA Supervisor S. Brown, Reactor Engineer
  • B. F. Caldwell, Superintendent, Station Services
    • J. W. Cox, Superintendent, Technical Services M. Hawes, Associate Engineer - Reactor
    • C. L. Hartzell, Compliance Engineer
  • P. G. Le Roy, Licensing Engineer

,

l

  1. J. H. Knuti, Operating Engineer
  1. W. R. McCollum, Superintendent of Scheduling l

C. E. Muse, Operating Engineer

  • D. M. Robinson, Reactor Engineer I
    • F. P. Schiffley, Compliance Engineer
  • G. Smith, Superintendent of Maintenance Other licensee employees included four shif t supervisors, eight reactor operators, and six office personnel.

NRC Resident Inspectors

    • P. H. Skinner, Senior Resident Inspector
    • P. K. VanDoorn, Senior Resident Inspector
  • Attended exit interview on February 13, 1986.
  1. Attended exit interview on February 28, 1986.

2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 13 and 28, 1986, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.

The inspectors described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.

No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.

Inspector Followup Item (IFI) 414/86-13-01, Assure Rod Swap Measurements have been approved for Initial tests prior to use.

Proprietary material was reviewed by the inspectors during this inspection, but is not included in this report.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters j

This subject was not addressed in the inspection.

!

!

I

- - -. --- ---.----- - - - - - - - -

-

.

- _ _

. _ _ _

.

-

i 4.

Unresolved Items No unresolved items were identified during this inspection.

5.

Startup Test Program Procedure Review - Unit 2 (72400, 72564, 72570, 72572)

The following test and surveillance procedures to be used in the Unit 2 startup test program were reviewed for conformance to FSAR commitments and anticipated technical specification requirements.

a.

TP/2/A/2600/07, Rod Drop Time Testing, b.

IP/0/A/3220/01, Full Length Rod Cluster Control Assembly Drop Timing IRE System, c.

TP/2/A/2100/02, Controlling Procedure for Zero Power Physics Testing, This procedure provides the testing sequence for the following zero power test procedures, which were reviewed in concert:

(1) PT/2/A/4150/12A, Isothermal Temperature Coefficient of Reactivity l

Measurement, i

(2) PT/2/A/4150/10, Boron Endpoint Measurement, (3) PT/2/A/4150/05, Core Power Distribution (at 3% Power),

(4) PT/2/A/4150/11A, Control Rod Worth Measurement by Boration/

Dilution, (5) PT/2/A/4150/11B, Control Rod Worth Measurement by Rod Swap, I

This procedure does not reflect the test method described in Chapter 14 of the FSAR.

The licensee has submitted a proposed change to the FSAR to authorize the new method, but it has yet to be approved. This item will be followed as IFI 414/86-13-01:

Assure rod swap measurements have been approved for initial tests prior to use, d.

TP/2/A/2650/01, Initial Fuel Loading, e.

TP/2/A/2150/04, Doppler Only Power Coefficient Measurement (to be performed at 50% and 90% rated thermal power),

i f.

PT/2/A/4150/19, 1/M Approach to Criticality.

,

Following discussions with licensee personnel, the insp'ector had no further questions regarding these procedures.

l

,

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

6.

Controlling Procedure for Unit Startup - Unit 2 OP/2/A/6100/01, Controlling Procedure for Unit Startup, was reviewed to compare its requis"ements for determining reactor protection system channel

^

operability with those of proposed technical specification table 3.3-1.

All

,

items of the table are addressed in the procedure with appropriate instru-ment procedures (IPs) identified for the surveillance tests except for item 6, Source Range Neutron Flux.

The Senior Resident Inspector is following up this issue to assure that the safety functions of the source range nuclear instruments are tested prior to leaving mode 6.

7.

Reactor Coolant System Leakrate Measurements (61728)

Using information from the Unit One Data Book (OP/1/A/6700/01), curves 7.27, 7.36, and 7.52, and station drawings, CNM 1201.01-67, CNM 1201.01-66, and 1188E03, the inspectors prepared and entered into the data base the unit-specific data required by RCSLK9, the micro-computer program for independent measurement of reactor coolant system (RCS) leakage measurement.

Both the slope and geometric method of calculating volumes of horizontal tanks are supported.

Subsequently, RCSLK9 was used to confirm the results of the licensee's recent calculations of RCS leakage using data from the Unit 1 plant computer output.

PT/1/A/4150/01B, NC Manual Leakage Measurement, and a description of the computer reactor coolant leakage calculations were reviewed.

These proce-dures and the comparison calculations will be discussed at a future inspec-tion when the appropriate licensee personnel are available.

8.

Initial Fuel Load Witnessing (72524)

a.

Fuel Loading The inspectors witnessed initial fuel loading at the Catawba, Unit 2 facility.

Initial fuel loading for Unit 2 started February 25, 1986, in accordance with procedure TP/2/A/2650/01 (Revision 6), Initial Fuel Loading.

TP/2/A/2650/01 established the conditions under which installation of the initial core was to be accomplished and specified the sequence of events which constituted the initial core loading program.

Fuel loading was witnessed from the control room, refueling floor and spent fuel pool to verify that technical specifications requirements, license conditions and NRC requirements were met.

The inspectors' observations included the following

,

1.

Direct communication was established between the control room and the refueling floor.

2.

Shift turnovers conformed with administrative procedures.

'

3.

Controls limited personnel access to the refueling floor.

'

,

.

.

.

4.

Confirmation that boron concentration was being verified by proper sampling and analysis, at the required frequency.

5.

Verification that both audible and visual indication of count rate existed in the control room.

6.

Verification that an inverse count rate ration (ICRR) was determined and plotted as a function of the total number of assemblies loaded.

7.

Verification that. the status board in the control room was maintained current and periodically reviewed by the reactor engineer.

b.

Procedure Review The inspectors reviewed procedures related to initial fuel loading at Catawba, Unit 2 facility.

The procedures were analyzed for embodiment of the necessary test prerequisites, preparations, instructions, acceptance criteria, and technical content.

Procedures reviewed included the following:

TP/2/A/2650/01 (Rev. 6), Initial Fuel Loading CP/0/A/8100/16, Chemistry Procedure CP/0/A/8800/05, Specification Limits PT/2/A/4550/02C, Unborated Water Source Isolation PT/2/A/4200/02C, Refueling Containment Integrity Verification - Part 1 PT/2/A/4200/02E, Refueling Containment Integrity Verification - Part 3 PT/2/A/4550/01B, Reactor Building and Fuel Transfer Refueling Component Test PT/2/A/4550/01C, Refueling Communication Test 9.

At-Power Moderator Temperature Coefficient of Reactivity Measurement (61708)

PT/1/A/4150/128, Isothermal Temperature Coefficient of Reactivity Measure-ment (E0L), was written to perform the surveillance test required by Technical Specification 3/4.1.1.3.

Review of the procedure confirmed that it was technically adequate to measure the isothermal temperature coeffi-cient at power.

The procedure is'similar to those in use at other facili-ties, in that reactivity change is determined from the change in boron concentration.

No use is made of a reactivity computer, which, in its inability to account for doppler feedback, is not reliable for at power measurements.

The inspector witnessed an attempt to perform the measurement.

The attempt failed because boron samples were not saved for re-analysis as required by the procedure.

The licensee then decided to use the results of an earlier attempt, during which the control rods were inadvertently moved a few steps.

A procedure change to permit use of those data as in process at the end of the inspection.

The revised procedure and test results will be reviewed during a future inspection of the facilit *

.

.

10.

Followup of Inspector Identified Items (92701)

(Closed) 413/85-46-01: Documentation of computer program RPECALIB.

The licensee has modified the program to echo check the input data and to provide an output for easy comparison of raw and fitted data to provide a qualitative assessment of the goodness of fit.

(Closed) 414/85-51-02: Controlling procedure for precritical tests.

The licensee has implemented a computerized scheduling program to control and sequence the entire startup testing program, thus obviating the need ~ for the controlling procedure.

l

.

j