IR 05000413/1986014
| ML20210H817 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/1986 |
| From: | Dan Collins, Stoddart P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210H809 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.F.1, TASK-TM 50-413-86-14, 50-414-86-12, NUDOCS 8604030180 | |
| Download: ML20210H817 (5) | |
Text
.
-..
__
t t
AMic UNITED STATES
/
oq'o,
,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
' ' ^
y "'
REGION li
g
,j 101 MARIETTA STRE ET.N.W.
- t ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323
%
l
PAR 2 01986 t
Report Nos.:
50-413/86-14 and 50-414/86-12 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Docket Nos.: 50-413 and 50-414 License Nos.: hPF-35 and NPF-48 Facility Name: Catawba 1 and 2
Inspection Con ed:
February 18-19, 1986 Inspector:._
M 3[
M P. Stoddi W Date Signed Approved by:
/
3//.3[M D. M. Collins, Branch Chief
'Date Signed
'
.
Emergency Preparedness and Radiation Protection Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 12 inspector-hours onsite I
' in the areas of liquid and gaseous radwaste treatment systems and effluent monitoring.
Results: No violations or deviations were identified, i
i l
8604030100860%gg PDR ADOCK PDR G
l f
l
__
n-
.
.
I
'
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted-Licensee Employees
- J. W. Hampton, Station Manager
- J. W. Cox, Superintendent. Tec5nical Services
- W.
P. Deal, Statian Health Physicist
- P. N. McNamara, Health Phys!".ist W. Beaver, Supervisor, Performance T. Bohart, Engineer, Performance (Contractor)
R. W. DeShazo, Shift Supervisor, Health Physics A. Duckworth, Coordinator, Radwaste Che:nistry
- C. L. Hartzell, Compliance Engineer NRC Resident Inspectors P. Skinner K. VanDoorn
- Attended exit interview-2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 19, 1986, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. The licensee acknowledged the findings and took no exceptf ons.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspectors during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Watters This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
4.
NUREG-0737 Items (TMI Action Piara, Units 1 and 2)
The inspector reviewed licensee actions taker to meet the guidelines of NUREG-0737 Items II.F.1, Attachment 1, and II.F.1, Attachment 2, and of TM1 Action Plan Items II.F.1, Subpart 1, " Procedures," II.F.1, Subpart 2a,
" Noble Gas Monitors," and II.F.1, Subpart 2b, " Iodine and Particulate Sampling."
The inspector reviewed documentation for EMF-35, t'1e low-range particulate monitor for the Unit Vent, and reviewed plant proc.dures and facilities for collecting and evaluating high-range particulate samples from the Unit Vent.
The inspector also reviewed documentation for EHF-37, the low-range iodine monitor for the Unit Vent, and reviewed procedures and facilities for collecting and evaluating high range radiciodine cartridges for
. _.
-
__
_
__
._
.._
_
_ -.
,
u
determination of radiciodines in plant effiocats from the Unit Vent. The
inspector reviewed documentatton for EM F-36, the high-range noble gas l
effluent monitor. f6r the Unit Vent.
EMF-36 uses a thin-wall ionization i
chamber as a detector.
'
The inspector reviewed procedures for the operation, calibration, and maintenance 9T the monitors and samplers and for analysis of high range
!
samples for EHF-35, 36, and 37.
Procedures were determined to be complete
'
and had been reviewed and approved in accordance with facility and Technical Specification requirements.
The inspector, accompanied by a licensee ren esentative, went to each EMF location and examined the installation of each EMF.
The location and uquipment were as described in the FSAR and in plant procedures and each unit appeared to be operating satisfactorily.
Cn the basis of the information provided Cy the licensee, on the iGspector's
,
examination of the installed facilitics, isd on the inspector's review of pertinent procedures, the inspector concluded that the installed equipment,
,
and the procedures ;ertaining to the equipment, fulfilled the design criteria of NUREG-0737, Items II.F.1, Attachments 1 and 2 and of TMI Action Plan Items II.F.1.1, II.F.1.2.a and II.F.1.2.b.
These items are considered closed.
No violations or deviations were ident?fied.
5.
Gaseour Waste System (84524, Unit 2)
{
The inspector. reviewed the following preoperational test procedures for
Unit 2:
TP/2/A/1450/06: Annulus Ventilatton-System Functional Test.
TP/2/G/1450/19.
Containment Ventilation System Functional Test.
>
TP/2/B/1450/15:
Fuel Pool Ventilation System Functional Test.
TP/2/E/1450/03:
Containmett Purge Ventilation System Furmtional Test.
TP/2/B/1450/12e Containment Air Release and Addition Preop rational e
Test.
TP/2/8/1450/25: Unit 2 Post Accident Containment Air Sat.pling System Test.
,
TP/2/B/1450/14: Containment Hydrogen 5 ample and Purge System Functicaai Test.
All gaseous waste system' preo'perational test orocedures which had been schedcled for completion prior to fuel-loading nad been completed prior tru the inspection. A number of operational a3d (actional test proceduras had
'
- --
.-
-._..
.
- -
. - - -
- - - -..
.
--
-
- -
.
~.
,
. _ _ _ _
.
.
been scheduled for later dates and will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
-
The inspector's review of test procedures included:
verification of management review and approval of changes; identification and correction of deficiencies; and completed results and retesting, as needed, following deficiency correction or modification.
No violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Liquids and Liquid Wastes (84523, Unit 2)
Almost all of the components of the liquid radwaste collection, retention and processing systems were ins'alled at the time of construction of Unit 1 and were subjected to preoperational testing at that time.
One of the few items remaining to be tested was the floor drain system connecting Unit 2 to the liquid radwaste area.
The inspector reviewed TP/2/8/1500/07, "Various Buildings Floor Drain System Functional Test."
The review included:
verification of management review and approval of changes; identification and correction of deficiencies; and completed results and retesting, as needed, foHowing deficiency correction or modification.
No violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Process and Effluent Menitoring (84523, 84524, Unit 2)
Effluent monitoring and sampling equipment was installe/1 and tested at the time of Unit I completion.
The inspector reviewed procedure package TP/2/8/1600/01A, " Process Radiation Monitoring System Functional Test."
The review included:
verification of management review and approval of changes; identification and correction of deficiencies; and traipleted results and retesting, as needed, following deficiency correction or modification.
No violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Review of Inspector Followup Items a.
(Closed) IFI 50-414/85-14-01, Review Corrective Actions to Correct Excessive Spacing in Charcoal Absorber Cells of ESF Air Treatment Systems. The inspector examined the ESF charcoal absorber cells in the ESF air treatment systems and determined that the licensee had reduced or minimized the spacing such that no significant quantity of charcoal leaked from the charcoal beds during or after loading. This item is considered closed.
=
-
5 b.
(0 pen) IFI 50-413/85-12-01, 50-414/85-01-01, Review modification to post accident liquid sampling system (PALSS) routine undiluted sample residues to containment sump; The licensee has scheduled the necessary modifications for the first refueling outage of both Units 1 and 2.
c.
(0 pen) URI 50-413/86-12-02, 50-414/86-01-02, Sampling of radioiodine aerosols has been identified as being subject to substantial but unquantified losses in long sampling lines generic item applicable to all pow 2r reactors. Licensee has not been able to devote time to this issue due to press of work related to Unit 2 licensing.
.