IR 05000397/2004004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IR 05000397-04-004 Errata for Columbia Generating Station - NRC Integrated Inspection Report
ML050210016
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 01/20/2005
From: William Jones
NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-E
To: Parrish J
Energy Northwest
References
EA-04-0192 IR-04-004
Download: ML050210016 (5)


Text

ary 20, 2005

SUBJECT:

ERRATA FOR COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000397/2004004

Dear Mr. Parrish:

Please replace page 17 of NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000397/2004004, dated November 5, 2004, with the attached revised page.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

William B. Jones, Chief Project Branch E Division of Reactor Projects Docket: 50-397 License: NPF-21 Enclosure:

Page 17 from NRC Inspection Report 05000397/2004004

Energy Northwest -2-cc w/enclosure:

W. Scott Oxenford (Mail Drop PE04)

Vice President, Nuclear Generation Energy Northwest P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352-0968 Albert E. Mouncer (Mail Drop PE01)

Vice President, Corporate Services/

General Counsel/CFO Energy Northwest P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352-0968 Chairman Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council P.O. Box 43172 Olympia, WA 98504-3172 Douglas W. Coleman (Mail Drop PE20)

Manager, Regulatory Programs Energy Northwest P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352-0968 Gregory V. Cullen (Mail Drop PE20)

Supervisor, Licensing Energy Northwest P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352-0968 Chairman Benton County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 190 Prosser, WA 99350-0190 Dale K. Atkinson (Mail Drop PE08)

Vice President, Technical Services Energy Northwest P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352-0968 Thomas C. Poindexter, Esq.

Winston & Strawn 1400 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-3502

Energy Northwest -3-Bob Nichols Executive Policy Division Office of the Governor P.O. Box 43113 Olympia, WA 98504-3113 Lynn Albin, Radiation Physicist Washington State Department of Health P.O. Box 7827 Olympia, WA 98504-7827 Technical Services Branch Chief FEMA Region X Federal Regional Center 130 228th Street, S.W.

Bothell, WA 98021-9796

Energy Northwest -4-Electronic distribution by RIV:

Regional Administrator (BSM1)

DRP Director (ATH)

DRS Director (DDC)

DRS STA (DAP)

Senior Resident Inspector (ZKD)

Resident Inspector (RBC1)

Branch Chief, DRP/E (WBJ)

Senior Project Engineer, DRP/E (VGG)

Team Leader, DRP/TSS (RLN1)

RITS Coordinator (KEG)

Jennifer Dixon-Herrity, OEDO RIV Coordinator (JLD)

Columbia Site Secretary (LEF1)

Dale Thatcher (DFT)

W. A. Maier, RSLO (WAM)

NSIR/EPPO (JDA1)

SISP Review Completed: WBJ ADAMS: / Yes G No Initials: _ WBJ __

/ Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive / Non-Sensitive R:\_COL\2005\COL2004-04RPerrata.wpd ML050210016 RIV:C:DRP/E C:DRS/PSB C:DRP/E WBJones:mjs MPShannon WBJones sign

/RA/ /RA/ /RA/

1/19/05 1/20/05 1/20/05 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY D=Discussed T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax

-17-Additionally, the Mrule Open Scoping Issue list contained 56 scoping issues, only 2 of which had been closed. Review of several of the open issues revealed that some had resolutions which appeared to close the item, but they were still shown as being open.

The majority of the issues appeared to deal with the question of whether certain structures or components, or their functions, should be included in the scope of the Maintenance Rule. The inspectors were able to ascertain that the list contained open scoping issues that dated back to at least July 2002.

Energy Northwest personnel initiated on September 23, 2004, Condition Report (CR) CR 2-04-05341 to review and evaluate the two conditions discussed above.

.3 Cross-References to Problem Identification and Resolution Findings Documented Elsewhere A problem identification and resolution crosscutting aspect was identified for actions needed to resolve individual conditions that had been transferred to the Mrule Open Scoping Issue list. This list is a non-proceduralized and uncontrolled document created as an aide to the Maintenance Rule Coordinator in an attempt to keep track of Maintenance Rule scoping questions requiring resolution (1R12).

Problem identification and resolution aspects were reviewed for the effectiveness of Energy Northwest's problem identification and resolution processes regarding exposure tracking, higher than planned exposure levels, and radiation worker practices. No findings of significance were identified (Section 2OS2).

4OA3 Event Followup (71153)

.1 July 30, 2004, Automatic Reactor Scram and Alert Declaration a. Inspection Scope On July 30, 2004, the inspectors observed and evaluated Energy Northwests response to an automatic reactor scram and Alert declaration which was made at 10:00 p.m. PDT.

The inspectors responded to the control room and verified the status of plant conditions by observing key plant parameters, annunciator status, and observing the current status of safety related mitigating equipment. The inspectors also observed reactor operator actions in response to the plant scram and senior reactor operators evaluation of plant conditions and oversight of the reactor operators. Following the declaration of the Alert, the inspectors relocated to the technical support center to observe Energy Northwests response to the event to ensure that actions taken were commensurate with established emergency implementing procedures and that technical support center staffs evaluation and assessment of plant conditions and emergency response was adequate. Energy Northwest subsequently terminated the Alert at 11:57 a.m. PDT after verifying that plant conditions were stable and that the initial criteria for which the Alert had been declared no longer were met. During a post event review, the inspectors reviewed operator logs, plant computer data, condition reports, and conducted interviews with plant employees to evaluate the appropriateness of operator actions and to verify plant response.

Enclosure