IR 05000339/1979036
| ML19208B142 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 07/11/1979 |
| From: | Martin R, Wagner A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19208B124 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-339-79-36, NUDOCS 7909190111 | |
| Download: ML19208B142 (4) | |
Text
.
"
UNITED STATES
'o,,
E'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
o
.
3.,
E REGION il
$
.. [
101 MARIETT A sT., N.W., SUITE 3100
"
o,
%
e" ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303
.....
,
Report No.
50-339/79-36 Licensee: Virginia Electric and Power Company P. O. Box 26666
~
Richmond, Virginia 23261 Facility Name: North Anna 2 Docket No.
50-339 CPPg78
['
License No.
Inspector:
/_
/d _ /f/f
'
A. G. Whgne'r
/ '_, _
n
,
y Da Sigfied
/ <~
Approved by: [
, Mfa [4* -dm, M.D @n.<ct41
[u//,/7'7f
,
R. D. flartin (/ D(g'e Signed SUMMARY Date of Inspectior.: 6-19-79/6-22-79 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 25 1/2 inspector-hours onsite in the area of preoperational test results.
Results Of the one area inspected, two apparent item of noncompliance were found.
(Inf raction:
Failure to meet acceptance criteria paragraph 5.b(3) and Defi-ciency: Failure to document procedure changes paragraph 5.b(4))
7 90919011\\
t;x
.
J i.,'O
.
.
.
.
s DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
_
- W. Nadison, NRC Coordinator
- C. R. Swope, Senior QC Inspector
- G. P. Kahn, Engineering Supervisor
- E. R. Smith, Jr., Superintendant Technical Services
- D. G. McLain, Engineering Supervisor
- S. C. Harvey, Operations Supervisor
- J. D. Kellams, Superintendant Operations
- E. W. Harrell, Superintendant Maintenance
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized oa June 22, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above. The licensee acknowledged the noncompliance items discussed in paragraphs 5.b(3) and 5.b(4), but stated that corrective action would be formulated upon receipt of this report.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Noncompliance (338/79-21-01), failure to establish, implement, and maintain procedures for the emergency diesel generator lube oil and cooling water system. The inspector reviewed the procedures and interviewed licensee representatives assuring that Appendix A of Regulatory Guide /1.33, November 1972 has been reviewed and all required procedures have been established. This item is closed.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations.
New unresolved items identiited during this inspection are discussed in paragraphs 5.b.(1) and 5.b.(2).
5.
Preoperational Test Results Review Completed pteoperational test procedures were reviewed for conformance with Nuclear Power Station Quality Assurance manual sections 2, 5, 11, 14, and FSAR section 14.1.1.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were noted during the review a.
of the following procedures:
o dL s
.
e
.
'
-2-(1) 2-PO-9 Nuclear Instrumentation System, completion approved 6/6/79.
(2) 2-PO-22.2 Chemical Feed System Test During Hot Functionals, completion approved 3/6/79.
(3) 2-P0-23 Sampling System, completion approved 6/13/79.
.
(4)
2-P0-28.2 Refueling Purification System, completion approved 4/10/79.
(5) 2-P0-30.0 Fuel Transfer System Tranfer Canal, completion approved 6/13/79 (6)
2-P0-2.2 Fire Protection System Control Circuit Test, completion approved 1/12/79.
(7)
2-P0-2.2 Fire Protection System - Hose Racks ccmpletion approved 1/8/79.
(8)
2-P0-3.2 Fire Protection System - Low Pressure Carbon Dioxide, completion approved 5/14/79.
(9)
2-PO-3.4 Fire Protection - Reactor Coolant Pump Radiant Heat Detectors, completion approved 5-14-79.
(10)
2-P0-4 Fire Protection -Halon.130.1, completion approved 5-18-79.
(11)
2-P0-5 circulating Water System, completion approved 4-10-79.
(12)
2-PO-7 Instrument Air Subsystem Bottles, completion approved 5-14-79.
(13)
2-PO-36.2 Safety Injection Functional Test Passive System Hot Functional Test, completion approved 5-14-79.
(14)
2-P0-36.4 Safety Injection System Hot Functional Test, completion approved 5-14-79.
(15) 2-P0-40 hydrostatic Test of Reactor Coolant System and Associated High Pressure Auxiliary Systems, completion approved 3-6-79.
(16)
2-P0-42.1 Reactor Coolant Loop Isolation Valve Test at Cold Conditions, completion approved 1-16-79.
(17)
2-P0-52.1 Pressurizer Relief Tank Test at Cold Conditions, comple-tion approved 1-16-79.
(18)
2-P0-68120V. AC Vital Bus Test, completion approved 5-14-79.
(19)
2-PO-18 Heating and Ventilation Systems Test, completion approved 6-6-79.
,,
ef
.
.
-3-
'
(20) 2-P0-22.1 Chemical Feed System Test at Cold Conditions, completion approved 1-8-79.
(21) 2-P0-67 125V. DC Power Supply Independence Test, completion approved 5-18-79.
b.
The following comments were noted during the review of test procedure results:
(1) Unresolved Item:
2-P0-1 Emergency Power System, completion approved 1-12-79.
The matter of the 2-J diesel generator trip-ping on overspeed during local manual starting is considered unresolved pending review by the licensee. The test chronological log indicated that the diesel generator must be manually flashed when starting locally to prevent tripping. This was subsequently proved to be incorrect (339/79-36-03).
(2) Unresolved Item:
2-P0-33 Chemical and Volume Control System Test, completion approved 6/13/79. The matter of the satisfactory completion of step 4.7.5 remains unresolved pending review by the licensee as to the meaning of a time entry of "0625" for that step.
This would indicate a time factor elapse greater than required by the step (339/79-36-04).
(3) During review of 2-P0-33 Chemical and Volume Control System Test During Hot Functionals, completion approved 6/13/79, it was noted that acceptance criteria 5.8 was not met. The critique section indicated that the cause was a temperature instrument problem.
It indicated that the problem was resolved by the submittal and clearance of MR N2-79-04061136. Upon review of the completed MR by the inspector it was found that the action did not clear the problem. It indicated that there was a problem with the procedure used by the test engineer.
There were no further entries to resolve this problem. This is an example of an item of noncom-pliance in the area of of failure to meet and evaluate acceptance criteria (339/79-36-01).
(4) During review of 2-P0-66 D.C. Power System Test, completion approved 5-14-79, it was noted that pen and ink changes were made to paragraph 4.6.17 and 4.4.23 without processing a " Request to Change Procedure".
In addition changes were made to paragraphs 4.3.5, 4.7.6, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3 and 5.2.4 w chout these paragraphs being listed on an authorized " Request to Change Procedure".
This is an example of an item of noncompliance in the area of failure to document procedure changes (339/79-36-02).
6.
Plant Tour The inspector toured portions of Unit 2 reactor building.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
W b