ML19208B137
| ML19208B137 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 07/11/1979 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19208B124 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-339-79-36, NUDOCS 7909190104 | |
| Download: ML19208B137 (2) | |
Text
.
~
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION License No. CPPR-78 Virginia, Electric and Power Company North Anna 2 Based on the NRC inspection June 19-22, 1979, certain of your activities were apparently not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indicated below. These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
A.
As required by 10 CFR 50 Appendix
'B', Criterion XI which states in part;
" Test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test require-ments have been met."
This requirement is further defined in VEP-1-3-A, Topical Report Quality Assurance Program Operations Phase, Section 17.2.11, and the Nuclear Power Station Quality Assurance Manual, Section 11, paragraph 5.1.1.d which requires "The Supervisor - Engineering Services, the Joint Test Group, and the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee shall be responsible for reviewing the test results and determining if the results meet established acceptance criteria..." and Test Control Instructions Preoperational Test Covers and Results Sheet and Chronological Log Sheet Item 11, which requires "The test engineer and/or individual (s) performing the test shall note the resolution of the discrepancies..."
Contrary to the above, 2-PO-33 Chemical and Volume Control System Test During Hot Functionals, results approved June 13, 1979, in the Discrepancy section of the Test Results indicates in Item 4., that acceptance criteria 5.8 was not met. The resolution for that item states "MR #N2-79-01251128 was submitted to instrument shop, cleared on 1-26-79."
The completed MR stated that " Procedural Error by Submitter - No Problem Found". In addition, it states the test engineer was informed of the error. There are no additional entries in the procedure to indicate a resolution to the discrepancy.
This is an infraction.
B.
As required by 10 CFR 50 Appendix
'B',
Criterion V which states in part;
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings..." This requirement is further defined in VEP-1-3A, Topical Report Quality Assurance Program Operations Phase, Section 17.2.5 and the Nuclear Power Station Quality Assurance Manual Section 11, paragraph 5.3.1 which requires "It shall be the responsibility of the initiator of a change to fully document his suggested change to insure that it can be given an expeditious and thorough review. The " REQUEST TO CHANGE PROCEDURE" shall be completed in accordance with attached instructions and forwarded to the cognizant supervisor.
') ' }
t.
V d
b 7 9 0919 Ottf!
Virginia Electric and Power Company Appendix A North Anna 2 Notice of Violation Contrary to the above, 2-P0-66 D.C. Power System Test, results approved May 14, 1979, had changes made to the following paragraphs which were not authorized to be changed by " Request to Change Procedure", pargagraph
- 4. 3.5, 4.4. 23, 4. 6.17, 4. 7.6, 5. 2.1, 5.2. 2, 5.2.3, and 5. 2.4.
This is a deficiency.
1 Q,0 c,f
-