IR 05000327/1981037
| ML20039D255 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 12/10/1981 |
| From: | Belisle G, Fredrickson P, Skinner P, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039D249 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-327-81-37, 50-328-81-46, NUDOCS 8112310464 | |
| Download: ML20039D255 (18) | |
Text
,
,
/
'o UNITED STATES g
- 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
U E
REGION ll
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SulTE 3100 o%g
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
- ,o Report Nos. 50-327/81-37 and 50-328/81-46 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Chestnut Street Tower II Chattanooga, TN 37401 Facility Name:
Sequoyah I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 License Nos. DPR-77 and DPR-79 Inspection at Sequoyah :,ite near Chattanooga, Tennessee
/cL!d /'/
Inspectors:
m E
G. A. Belisle
- J
'Date' Signed fYf 414-<-f'
/2hf8/
on g D6tef61gned P. E.
redr
/2l/ S/
-
~
P. H. Skinnei-Date signed
~
Approved by: W//ff f w
[2//O 8/
C. M. Upright 7Se' ion flyfef D' ate / Signed Engineering In ctio G ranch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on November 16-20, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 102 inspector-hours on site in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters; startup test program; QA/CC administration; audits; document control; maintenance; design changes and modifications; surveillance testing and calibration control procurement; receipt, storage, and handling; records; test and experiments; test and measurement equipment program; calibration; surveillance; and licensee action on previously identified inspection findings.
Results Of the 16 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
Nf$D
0
_
_
_
. _. -
..
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- A. Crevasse, QA Manager J. Gaines, Supervisor-Power Stores Unit J. Garner, Plant Services D. Gorman, QA Engineer
- W. Glassen, QA Coordinator
- R. Hamilton, QA Supervisor
- G. Kirk, Mechanical Engineer, Compliance D. Love, Maintenance Foreman
- C. Mason, Plant Superintendent
- D. McCloud, Field QA Staff Chief E. McClure, Engineering Aide
- d. McGriff, Assistant Plant Superintendent
- W. McKnight, Management Service Supervisor J. McPherson, Engineering and Test Unit Supervisor
- R. Moore, QA Evaluator '
B. Patterson, Instrumentation Supervisor
- R. Parker, QA Branch Chief J. Rinne, Assistant Field Services Supervisor D. Roberts, Nuclear Engineer, Compliance D. Romine, Compliance H. Sullivan, Mechanical Engineer W. Watson, Special Projects Maintenance Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicians and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspecter
- S. Butler
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on November 20, 1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The licensee acknowledged the inspection findings.
,
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters The following abbreviations are defined and used throughout this report:
..
.
Accepted QA Program Quality Assurance Program Description, Topical Report TVA-TR75-1A, Revision 4-CAR Corrective Action Report-DN-Discrepancy Notice DPM.
Division Procedures Manual ECN.
Engineering Change Notice-ISI Inservice Inspection MR
. Maintenance Request.
NRR NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation N-0QAM Nuclear Operations Quality Assurance Manual-PORC Plant Operations Review Committee QA Quality Assurance
.QC Quality Control T/S Technical Specifications WP Work Plan The following' items from IE Inspection Report-50-327/80-46 were reviewed with respect to the licensee's correspondence dated March 16, April 16 and ~
June 30,1981.
a.
(Closed) Violation (327/80-46-07):
Failure to Perform Compr ehensive Audit of Training Areas. This -violation was withdrawn in NRC corre-spondence dated April 7,1981.
b.
(Closed) Violation (327/80-46-08):
Failure to Maintain Weathertight Storage. The inspector reviewed the maintenance work order for the repair of warehouse 0B-3.
During a walk-through of the warehouse,
.after a rainstorm, no leakage was observed. All warehouse items were stored on pallets.
c.
(Closed) Violation (327/80-46-09): Failure to Protect Weld End Prepa-rations. The inspector reviewed the storage of stainless steel. pipe-and verified that proper and adequate protective measures are now being implemented, d.
(Closed) Violation (327/80-46-12):
Failure to Follow Procedure. The-inspector reviewed SQA 66, Plant-Housekeeping, revised June 22, 1981 and identified that positive controls have been established for plant cleanliness. The inspector conducted a tour of accessible plant areas.
Discussions with the resident inspector identified that general plant cleanliness is acceptable.
e.
(Closed)-Unresolved Item (327/81-06-01): Missing Copies of Validated Issued Manuals.
The inspector ' reviewed issued copies of validated manuals including copy #3 of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI which previously had not been located. A second item, copy
- 7 af Isolation Amplifier Model 572 manufactured by Robert Shaw,.was cons,idered lost and has been-removed from the listing of validated manual.
.
f.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (327/81-06-04):
Control of Power Stores QA Records.
Power - Stores SIL-8, _ Quality : Assurance. Records, dated August 1981 has been changed to reflect the actual index of Power -
Stores temporary records and the custodian is aware of the record types to be maintained.
4.
Unresolved Items tenresolved items are : natters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or devia-tions. A new unresolved item identified during this inspection is discussed in paragraph 14.a.
5.
QA For the Startup Test Program (35501)
References:
(a) Accepted QA Program (b)
Interdivisional QA Procedures Manual (c) Office of Power QA Manual (d) Operational QA Manuil (e) SQA 44, Plant Startup Test Program, revised 9/80 The inspector verified that' requirements have been established foe inspec-tion activities relating to the.startup test program including conduct of testing, tracking of test deficiencies, test documentation, and control of measuring and test equipment.
The inspector interviewed cognizant QA personnel to verify that they.under-stood their responsibilities-as applied to the startup test program. Audit report OPQAA-SQ-SP-03, Startup Testing, Units 1 and 2 was reviewed. During the audit three findings and two concerns were identified. The inspector verified corrective action was planned for the findings. The inspector also reviewed 25 plant surveys performed by QA during Unit 2 startup (approxi-mately 193 were performed) and verified corrective action was taken where applicable for DNs issued.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
QA/QC Administration (35740)
References:
(a) N-0QAM, Appendix A, Critical Structures, Systems, and Components (CSSC) List, revised 8/81 (b) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 1.1, Document Control, revised 8/81 (c) N-0QAM,'Part III, Section 8.1, Preparation, Maintenance, and Implementation of the Manual, revised 8/81 (d) Office of Power Quality Assurance Manual L
'
.
The inspector reviewed the references listed above to verify that they met requirements of the accepted QA Program. The following aspects of the QA/QC program were verified:
-
QA Program documents clearly define the structures, systems, compon-ents, and activities to which the program applies Administrative controls for QA/QC Department procedures exist that
-
provide for review and approval of procedures prior to implementation; controls for changes and revisions to procedures exist and controls exist for distribution and. recall of procedures
-
Responsibilities have been established to assure overall review of-the effectiveness of the QA Program
-
Methods exist to modify the QA Program to provide increased emphasis in problem areas identified during audit activities.
Based on +his review, no violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Audits (35741)
References:
(a) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 5.1 Auditing of the Operational Quality Assurance Program for TVA, revised 6/81 (b) N-0QAM, Part III, Section -5.2, Qualification, Certifi-cation, and Recertification of Quality Assurance Audit Personnel, revised 10/80 (c) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 7.2, Correccive Action, revised 6/81 (d)
ID-QAP-18.1, Qualification, Certification, and Recerti-fication of Quality Assurance ' Audit Personnel, Revision 1 (e) OP-QAP-18.1, Audits, Revision 3 (f) OP-QAP-16.1, Corrective Action, Revision 0 The inspector reviewed the references listed above and verified that they
-
met the requirements of the accepted QA Program and ANSI N4'. 2.12 -(Draft 3-Revision 4-1977) as endorsed by that program. The inspector verified the-following aspects of the audit program:
-
The scope of the audit program has been defined and is consistent with Technical Specifications Responsibilities have been assigned in writing for the overall manage-
-
ment of the audit program
-.
-
.
.
.
.
..
. -
.- _
a
.
t
-
-5
_
.
'
.
Methods have been defined for taking corrective action when deficien-
-
cies are identified during audits The audited organization Lis required to respond -in writing to audit
-
findings.
-
-Distribution requirements. for audit. reports and corrective action -
-- responses have been defined
-
Checklists are required to be used in the performance of audits.
To. verify implementation of these aspects, the inspector reviewed the
,.
results of the following four audits:
.'
AUDIT-DATE CONDUCTED OPQAA-SQ-81SP-01 February 3, 1981 OPQAA-SQ-80TS-03 January 21-23, 1981
OPQAA-SQ-81TS-03 April 30 - May 8,-'1981 OPQAA-SQ-81TS-04 April 13-23, 1981
{_
-Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Document Control (35742)
'
References:
(a) N-0QAM, Part 'III, Se'ction 1.1, Document Control,
'
revised 8/81 (b) AI-25, Drawing Control After Licersing, Revision 2 (c)
AI-4, Plant Instructions - Document Control, Revision 34 i
(d) AI-7, Recorder Charts and Quality Assurance Records, Revision 19.
The inspector reviewed the references listed above to verify that they met requirements of the accepted QA Program. The inspector also verified that
administrative controls have been established-to control drawings and that:
indices are maintained for drawings, manuals, technical specifications and-procedures which indicate current revisions.
The inspector selected the following documents to verify implementation of the document control program.
"
DRAWINGS LOCATIONS 47W611-68-2 Each drawing was verified at the 47W611-67-1,2,3,4,5 shif t engineers office, Units-1~'& 2 47W611-63-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 control room, maintenance shop and-47W611-62-1,2,3,4,5 instrument shop.
l
..,
-
e
.
-
.
.
MANUALS VALIDATION NUMBERS Units I & II Fuel Transfer System
Instruction Manual Manipulator Crane 1,3 Nuclear Feed Pump Drive Turbines for 1,2,3,4,5 USA-TVA-SNP Gate, Globe and Swing Check Valves -
Alyco Pressure Relief Valves -
Superior Valve Co.
Vertical _ Pump Trouble Shooting Manual 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
- Johnston Pumps Instruction and Operating Manual for 1,2 Inverters - Solidstate Contamination Spray Pumps (HZB) Sulzer
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
9.
Maintenance (62700, 35743)
References (a) Technical Specifications (b) SQM-2, Maintenance Management System, dated 3/81 (c) Quality Program Audit Report No. OPQAA-SQ-81-1 dated Jan. 7-16, 1981 The inspector reviewed maintenance activities on safety-related systems and components to ascertain whether these activities were conducted in accord-ance with approved procedures, regulatory guides and industry codes and in conformance with references (a) and (b). The following criteria were used during this review:
Required administrative approvals were obtained prior to initiating the
-
work
-
Limiting conditions for operation were met while the components were removed from serivce Approved procedures were used where the activity appeared to be beyond
-
the normal skills of the craft
,
,
.
.
-
Activities were accomplished by qualified personnel
-
Written procedures were established for initiating requests for routine and emergency maintenance
-
Criteria and responsibilities for review and approval of maintanance were estab.ished
-
Criteria and responsibilities that form the basis for designating the activity as safety or non-safety-related were established
-
Provisions and responsibilities were established for identification of appropriate inspection hold points related to maintenance activities
-
Methods and responsibilities were designated for performing functional testing of structures, systems or components following maintenance work and/or prior to their being returned to service.
Based on this review, one inspector followup item was identified.
The inspector reviewed approximately 15 completed maintenance requests (MRs) and the documentation associated with these requests. Several MRs classified as emergency were not reviewed by the QA Department as required by reference (b). The licensee audit documented in reference (c) had previously identi-fied th'.s item and corrective action is being formulated to correct this discrepancy.
This item will be tracked as an inspector followup item (327/81-37-03, 328/81-46-03) until the licensee's corrective action is completed and reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
10. Design Changes and Modifications (35744)
References:
(a) N-0QAM, Part II, Section 3.2, Plant Modifications:
After Licensing, revised 7/80 (b) AI-19, Plant Modification: Af ter Licensing, Revision 5 The inspector reviewed implementation of the licensee's design change program for Unit 2 with respect to the referenced administrative controls.
Implementation of the program was verified by reviewing several ECNs and WPs to verify that the following activities described in the control procedures were conducted for ecch document:
-
The design change request was reviewed and approved as required
-
Design input requirements were specified, reviewed and approved
-
Independent design verifications were performed as required
-
Post-modification acceptance tests were performed as required and designated acceptance criteria were met
,
_-
.
.
Design reviews required by Technical Specifications were performed
-
-
Changes to design documents were properly reviewed and approved.
With the. licensing of Un.t 2 being quite recent, the inspector identified only one safety related ECN completed on that unit..This ECN plus two more, completed on Unit 1.and planned for Unit 2, were reviewed for implementa-tion. - The reviewed documents are as follows:
5156 8372R1 5005 8832 8832R1 8832R2 5118 (Unit 2)
8904 8940 8962 8981-8982 Based on this review, no violations or deviations were~ identified.
11. -Surveillance Testing and Calibration Control (35745)
Reference:
(a) N-0QAM, Part II, Section 5.1, Inservice Inspection, revised 2/81 (b) N-0QAM,. Part II, Section 4.5, Plant Surveillance Test Program, revised 8/81 (c) SQA-41, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant - Surveillance Test-Program, revised 6/81 (d) AI-4, Plant Instructions - Document Control, Revision 34 (e) TI-10 (Part 1), Calibration Program for Measuring and Test Equipment, Revision 18 (f) TI-10 (Part II), Calibration Program for Measuring and Test Equipment Except Crimping Tools, Dies, and Go/No-Go Gauges Used by Sequoyah Nuclear-Plant Maintenance and Quality Assurance Sections, Revision 12 (g)
SI-1, Surveillance Program, Revision 6'
-(h) TI-54, Compliance Instruments, Revision 3
_
.
(i) TI-542, Compliance Instruments, Revision 0 (j) TI-59, Listing of Tech Spec Instruments, Revision 0 (k) SQA-45, Quality Control of Materials and Parts and Services, revised 10/81 (1) SQE 8, Decentation of Calibration, revised 9/80 (m) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 1.2, Control of Installed Technical Specification Coroliance Instrumentation, revised 11/80 (n) SI-166, Summary of Valve Test for ASME Section XI, Revision 3 (o) SI-164, Testing Setpoint of Safety Relief Valves (ASME Section XI Category C Valves), Revision 3 (p) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, Subsection IWV,1974 Edition Through Summer 1975 Addenda (q) Letter J.
M.
Ballentine to J. G.
Dewease, dcted December 23,1980 (L53 801223 923)
(r) MTI-14, Summary of ASME B&PV Code Pump and Valve Program, Revision 0 (s)
Letter J. E. Gilleland to S. A. Varga dated August 23, 1977 and subsequent revisions The inspector ciewed the references listed above to assure that they met the requirements of the accepted QA Program, Technical Specifications, 10 CFR 55a and ANSI N18.7-1976 as endorsed by that program. The following aspects of surveillance testing and the calibration program were reviewed:
-
A master schedule for surveillance testing / calibration / inservice inspections has been established which includes frequency for each test, plant group responsible for performing each test and surveillance test status
-
Responsibility has been assigned to maintain the surveillance test /
calibration / inspection schedule up-to-date and implemented
-
Requirements have been established for conducting surveillance tests, calibrations and inspections in accordance with approved procedures which include acceptance criteria i
.
.
-
Responsibilities have been defined for. review and evaluation of test data including procedures for. reporting deficiencies identified during testing with required verification that LCO requirements were satis-fied.
Similar requirements have been established for calibration of ~ components associated with safety-related systems.which are not specifically addressed in T/S.
The inspector selected 22 surveillances ' and verified that they - were scheduled to be performed as required by the T/S. The inspector selected five safety-related plant instruments which are not specifically required to be calibrated by T/S and verified that the instruments were scheduled.to be calibrated, that calibration procedures were approved as required and that calibrations 'had been performed.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
12.
Procurement (35746)
References:
(a) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 2.1, Procurement of Materials Components and Spare Parts, revised 4/79 (b) SQA-45, Quality Control of Material, Parts and Services, revised 10/81 The inspector reviewed the implementation of the -licensee's procurement program for Unit 2 with respect to the referenced administrative controls.
Implementation of the program was verified by reviewing the procurement documents on several safety-related items and verifying that they were prepared in accordance with these administrative controls, that items-were purchased ' from qualified vendors, and that they required the vendor to supply appropriate documentation of quality.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
13.
Receipt, Storage and Handling (35747)
References:
(a) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 2.2, Receipt Inspectio'n, Handling, and Storage of Materials, Components and Spare Parts, revised 3/81-(b) AI-11, Material - Receipt Inspection, Revision 15 (c) AI-13, Nonconforming. Items, Revision 18 The inspector reviewed the implementation of the licensee's receipt storage and handling program for Unit 2 with respect to the referenced administra-tive controls.
Implementation of the program was verified by selecting several safety-related-items in storage and verifying document and item control to be in accordance with the program.
.
.
.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
14.
Records (35748)
References:
(a) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 4.1, Quality Assurance Records, revised 3/81 (b)
AI-7, Recordar Charts and Quality Assurance Records, Revision 20 (c) MS/DCU1, Document Receipt Control and Receiving File Operation,- Revision 0 The inspector reviewed implementation of the licensee's quality records control program for Unit 2 with respect to the referenced procedures.
Implementation was verified by reviewing several QA records to verify indexing, retrievability, and storage.
Based on this review, one unresolved item and two inspector followup items were identified and are discussed in the following paragraphs, a.
Fire Rating of Temporary Record Storage Cabinets The accepted QA Program commits to Regulatory Guide 1.88, Revision 2, which endorses ANSI N45.2.9-1974. An exception has been taken to-the ANSI standard in that active records may be temporarily stored in one-hour fire cabinets 1nstead of the normal vault requirements of the -
standard. The Regulatory Guide also endorse NFPA No. 232-1975 for records fire protection. This code specifies that the fire rating of the records cabinet shall be based on the combustible fire load of the records storage area and not ~a specif.ic fire rating for all areas.
There is an apparent conflict between the " blanket" authorization for one-hour cabinets in the QA Program and the fire load calculations required by the NFPA code to justify using one-hour fire rated cabinet.
This item is unresolved (327/81-37-01, 328-81-46-01) pending NRC review of this apparent conflict.
b.
Records Receipt System All three references require that a " record of quality assurance records received" be maintained. Reference (c) specifically addresses the use of a Transmittal Log for this purpose. The inspector observed that for records received from temporary storage, transmittal letters are sent. However, for records sent to Document Control immediately on completion, such as MRs, a formal Transmittal Log or receiving list is not maintained. The licensee maintains an MR computer tracking system which can locate any MR and narrow down its location as to either in QA review or in the Document Control receiving cabinets. This discrepancy
.
mOs
.
.
is identified as an inspector followup item (327/81-37-02, 328/81-46-02) pending the licensee changing the necessary procedures to reflect the use of. this tracking system to meef. the records receipt requirements of'theLQA Program.
The licensee committed to a target ~
date of March 1,1982 to complete the necessary revisions.
c.
Master Files Record Storage Reference (b), attachment 12 lists several quality records that_ are maintained in Master Files'as temporary storage prior to shipment to permanent storage.
Although reference (b) requires-that quality records in temporary storage be maintained in one-hour fire cabinets,
such cabinets were not in use as of November 17,1981. The inspector found that the official records of 1981 site QA/QC surveys were being
~
maintained in non-rated cabinets. A complete unofficial set of the 1981 QA/QC surveys was located in the QA office.
A violation for failure to follow procedure AI-7 is not issued due to the unofficial duplicate set of QA/QC surveys _. On November 19, the' official surveys were relocated to the permanent storage facility. Document control has assigned one-hour fire cabinets for storage of quality. records,-
maintained in Master Files.
This is identified as an. inspector followup item (327/81-37-04, 328/81-46-04) and will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection to verify proper record storage.
15.
Test and Experiments (35749)
References:
(a) N-0QAM, Part II, Section 4.6, Special Tests, revised-3/81 (b) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 1.1, Document Control, revised 8/81 (c) SQA 100, Special Tests, revised 9/81 (d) SQA 119, Unreviewed Safety Question Determination, revised 9/81 (e) SQA 21, Plant ~ Operations Review. Committee Charter, revised 12/80 The inspector reviewed the references listed above to verify that they met requirements of the accepted QA Program, Technical Specifications and ANSI
,
N18.7 as endorsed by that program.
The inspector verified the following-
,
aspects of the special test program:
,
i
-
A formal method has been established to handle requests to conduct special tests involving safety related components L
-
Provisions have been made to assure that special tests will -be per-formed in accordance with approved procedures l
'
.
.
.
.
~
.
Responsibilities'have been assigned for reviewing and approving special
-
test procedures
'
?
-
Responsibilities have been assigned to assure that ~a written -safety evaluation pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59 is ' conducted.
The inspector interviewed cognizant = plant personnel and. verified that they were knowledgeable in the processing of special - test requirements. The.
inspector reviewed five spacial test, experiment, or activity requests
,
(STEAR) and verified that they met requirements of the accepted QA Program, Technical. Specifications and ANSI N18.7 as endorsed by that program. The special tests reviewed were STEAR 11,16,17,18 and 19.
'
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
16. -Test and Measurement Equipment Program (35750)
References:
-(a) N-00AM, Part III, Section 3.1, Control of Measuring and Test Equipment, revised 4/81 (b) N-0QAM, Part III, Section 3~.2, Control-of Installed Technical.-Specification Compliance Instrumentation,
,
revised 11/80 (c) TI-10 (Part I), Calibration Program for Measuring and -
Test Equipment, Revision 19 (d) TI-10 (Part II), Calibration.P'rogram for Mea'suring :and Test Equipment Except Crimping Tools., Dies, and Go/No-Go
'
Gauges Used by Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Maintenance and
~
,
Quality Assurance Sections, Revision 12 (e) Results Section and~ Maintenance Instruction Letter A64, Control and Use of Measuring and Test Equipment, ~ Revi -
.
i sion 22 (f) MSL-A22, Calibration Program for Measuring and Test Equipment Except Crimping Tools, Di e s',
and. Go/No-Go '
-
Gauges Used by Sequoyah Nuclear-Plant Maintenance and Quality Assurance Sections, Revision 16
,
The inspector reviewed _ the listed referenm to insure that they met. the r-requirements of the accepted QA Pregram and ANSI N45.2.4-1974 as_ committed to by that program. The inspector verified the following aspects of the test and measuring equipment program:
-
Criteria and ~ responsibility. for assignment of the calibration /
adjustment frequency have been established
.
..
--
. -
.
.
t f
-
An equipment inventory list has been prepared which identifies equip-
.
- ment used on safety-related. structures, systems or components and-
,
calibration frequency of each piece of equipment-
-
Requirements exist for marking the latest. calibration date on each piece of equipment
-
A system has been provided for assuring that equipment is calibrated
-
before the date required
-
Requirements have been established which prohibit use of equipment which has not been calibrated within the prescribed frequency
.
Calibration controls have been established which require evaluation of
-
the cause of an out-of-calibration and the acceptability of items calibrated
-
New equipment will be added to the inventory list and calibrated prior
.l to being placed in service.
The inspector reviewed approximately 30 pieces of various test equipment from the outage, maintenance and instrumentation departments.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
-17.
Calibration (56700)
The references listed in paragraph 11 were reviewed during the inspection of calibration activities to verify that they met requirements of the accepted QA Program, Technical Specifications and ANSI N18.7-1976 as endorsed by that program. The inspector verif ed the following aspects of the calibration
-
program:-
-
The frequency of calibration of selected instruments specified in the Technical Specifications has been met
-
Test documentation for completed calibrations included acceptance criteria, documentation was complete, approved procedures were used -and personnel were qualified to perform the calibration
-
Procedures contain controls to assure limiting conditions for opera-tions are met during the calibration
-
Procedures contain controls to assure calibrations will be to the required accuracy, as-found and as-left conditions will be recorded, and calibration equipment will be traceable to the National Bureau of-Standards Procedures exist to calibrate safety-related instrumentation not
-
specifically addressed by Technical Specifications.
-
y~,
-,
.--w
.s
.-f
_,e.
.
..._.-
4--,
,,
r
.,, -. -
,
.I r..e.
-
, -
.
.
The inspector-reviewed five completed calibrations required by Technical Specifications, five completed calibrations not covered by Technical Speci-fications, and 15 other procedures for calibration of equipment to. verify-i the implementation of calibration activities.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
18. Surveillance (61700)
The references listed in paragraph 11 were reviewed during the inspection of surveillance activities to verify that they met requirements of the accepted QA Program, Technical' Specifications, Inservice Inspection Program and ANSI N16.7-1976 as endorsed by that program. The inspector verified the following aspects of the surveillance program:
-
Technical Specification - surveillance testing is covered by ' approved procedures
-
Testing required by the Inservice Inspection Program (ISI) is covered by approved procedures
-
Test procedures are in accordance with required formats relative' to prerequisites, acceptance criteria and system restoration
-
. Testing of systems assures compliance with the Technical Specifications and ISI Program
-
Completed tests are reviewed for adequacy
-
Testing is performed within required frequencies
-
Nonconformances identified during testing are corrected
-
Testing is performed by qualified personnel.
The inspector reviewed 22 surveillance procedures and 6 ISI procedures as well as the data associated with each and verified that surveillance and ISI activities are being performed as required.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
19.
Licensee Action On Previously Identified Inspection Findings a.
(Closed) Open Item (327/78-39-01): Inadequate or Incomplete Guidance Furnished to-Plant Personnel. The inspector reviewed various sections of the N-0QAM as referenced throughout this report and verified that they met applicable requirements of the accepted QA Program. -The inspector also reviewed corresponding OPM procedures and verified the same result.-
. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _.
,
i
b.
(Closed) Open Item (327/78-39-06): Definition of Other Organizations.
The licensee's existing QA procedures define ' those organizations responsible for reviewing the status and adequacy of the QA Program, c.
(Closed) Open Item (377/78-39-26):
Items Not Included in Current Handling Procedures and Practices. Maintenance Section Letter. A34, Revision 0 documents inspections performed on the power stores handling equipment.
d.
(Closed) Open Item (327/79-41-01): Issuance of DPM N79E2. This item was identified by the licensee as CAR 25-79-21. The corrective action fo-this CAR was completed and the CAR was closed February 15, 1980.
e.
(Closed) Open Item (327/79-70-02):
Duplicate Storage Facility. The licensee has included the use of duplicate records as an option for permanent records storage in the N-00AM and AI-7.
This item was -
identified by the licensee as CAR 16-79-177.
The corrective actions for this CAR was completed and the CAR was closed February 12, 1980.
f.
(Closed) Open Item (327/79-70-03):
Establish How Cperations and Maintenance QA Documents Are Reviewed and Transmitted to Central Files.
This item was identified by the licensee as CAR 16-79-178 and 16-79-179. The corrective action'for these CARS was completed and the CARS were closed March 3,1980.
g.
(Closed) Open Item (327/79-70-04): Offsite Review Board Review. This item was identified by the licensee as CAR 21-79-180. The corrective action for the CAR was closed April 4,1980.
h.
(Closed) Open Item (327/80-46-15):
Updating of QA Manuals.
The inspector reviewed the accepted QA Program and sub-tier documents as discussed throughout this report and verified that Revision 4 of the program has been incorporated into the N-0QAM and' plant instructions.
1.
(Closed) Open Item (327/80-46-17):. Reevaluation of Storage Criteria for Equipment Requiring Rotation or Meggering. Both AI-11, Revision 15 and the N-0QAM, Part III, Section 2.2, dated 3/81, have been revised to -
specify the type and size of equipment which will be managed under a periodic rotation and/or electrical meggering program.
j.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (327/80-46-18): Conflicting Dates for Calibration Between the Central Laboratories and Sequoyah Instrument Shop. A discussion with instrumentation and control personnel and a
'
review of existing department calibration control procedures indicate that all calibration due dates are now controlled by SNP documents.
k.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (327/80-46-19): Inconsistency Between N-0QAM and AI-19. The inspector verified that AI-19, Revision 4, has been revised so that the previously discrepant definitions are consis-tent with the N-0QA _
,
.
.
Si
- s 1.
(Closed) Inspector Followup' Item (327/80-46-20): Plant' Tour Observa -
tions. The inspector toured accessible areas of the plant as discuss'ed in paragraph 3.d.
Plant cleanliness was acceptable.
m.
-(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (327/80-46-21): Temporary Storage
~_'
Time for Records.
The N-0QAM,' Part Ill,.Section 4.1 has been revised
--
to identify records which. will be maintained in temporary record storage longer than three months.
n.
(0 pen) Inspector Followup Item -(327/80-46-22):
Implementation of -
Training Program for QA and Receipt Inspectors. Due to a large imple-mentation program, the completion date has been extended to January 1, 1982.
~
.
o.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Ite:n (327/80-46-23):. Organization 'and Administration.
The licensee submitted a Technical Specification amendment March 25, 1981. Amendment #47 is the latest-proposal; dealing
,
with the organization. This organizational change was approved by th6 PORC on November 17, 1981.
,
p.
(0 pen) Open Item (327/81-06-06):
Distribution of QA Procedures.
SQA 43 was changed prior 'to the targeted date of March 31, 1981,,but recent additions of personnel to the distribution li.st require another change.
.
q.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (327/81-06-08):
Annual, Review of-Plant Procedures. The inspector reviewed minutes of PORC meetir.g nos.
1614, 1624, 1634, 1642 and 1654 which documented. that reviews 3of
.
various plant' procedures have been conducted by PORC subcommittees..and the results approved by the PORC.
r
-
~.
r
-
g 4-
=
{ =
,,g L
e*
k
- -
g.
e-r
/
_-
-
e
~
~
y;!-