IR 05000328/1981029
| ML20009D798 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 06/19/1981 |
| From: | Burnett P, Fiedler R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009D793 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-328-81-29, NUDOCS 8107240358 | |
| Download: ML20009D798 (3) | |
Text
-
.
.,,,
kit Rf
/
UNITED ST ATES
o
! j r. g',,q NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'"A c
REGION 11
- o, % ! 1/ /
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
.,
- ef ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303
'
.....
JUN 3 0 ISSI
Report No. 50-328/81-29 Licensee:
Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Cnestnut Street Chattanooga, TN 37401 i
Facility Name:
Sequoyah. Unit 2 Docket No. 50-328 License No. CPPR-73 Inspection at Sequoyah Site Chattanooga, Tennessee Inspector:
fjopAV./M d'/f-f/
R.
L~.
Fi ed l'e'r~ ~
'/
Date Signed
'
Approved by: _
1/M g-/f r/
P.9.~ Burndti, ~.ketirig Scction Chief Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on June 3-5, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 19 inspector-hoars on site in the areas of review of the Integrated Engineered Safety Features 3ystem Test procedure and on followup of previous inspection findings.
Results
,
Of the two areas i,ispected, no violations or deviations were identified.
S 8107240358 810630
'e DR ADOCK 05000328-
,
. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.,
._
.
. - _ - -
.
_ - _ -
.
..
,
- t '
.
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
' *J. M. McGriff, Assistant Plant Superintendent M. R. Harding, Compliance Supervisor M. Halley, Pre-rp Supervisor D. O. McCloud, Quality Assurance Supervisor NRC Resident Inspector
- E. Ford, Senior Resident Inspector S. D. Butler, Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The ir:spection scope and findings were summarized on June 5,1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Violatten (VIO 327/81-07-01) Failure of the PORC to render deter-minations in writing with regard to whether or not items considered consti-tute an unreviewed safety question. The inspector reviewed the corrective steps taken as describsd ir, the April 17, 1981, letter from the licensee.
The corrective step taken appeared to be adequate, therefore this item is considered closed.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were n 4t identified during t his inspection.
5.
Integrated Engineered Safety Features (ESF) lest Procedure Review The inspector reviewed a draft copy of preoperational test W-6.1F "Inte-grated Engineering Safeguards Activation" to verify that the test procedure adequately-addresses NRC requirements and licenset commitments relating to engineered safety features. The procedure included the following required demonstrations:
The ESF systems are aligned for normal operation using plant system a.
ooerating instructions and the status is recorded.
.
-
.
-
.
.
_.
-
- _
-. -.
.
,
.<..
..
b.
Electrical power train B for Unit 2 including all AC and DC and the
,
diesel generator are disabled and deenergized.
c.
A SI and Phase B containment isolation signal are simultaneously activated using the manual actuation handswitches on the main control board, d.
The proper operation of the train A equipment is verified.
e.
The' ESF systems are realigned for normal operation and the status recorded.
f.
Electrical power train A for Unit 2 including all AC and DC and the diesel generator are disabled and deenergized.
g.
A SI and Phase B containment isolation signal are simultaneously actuated using the manual actuation handswitcFes on the main control board.
- h.
The proper operation of the train B equipment is verified.
i.
The 'ESF systems are realigned for normal operation and the status recorded.
J.
A SI and Phase B containment' isolation signal and a loss of power to the Unit 2 6.9 KV boards 2A, 28, 2C and 2D (Blackout) simultaneously initiated using handswitches on the main control board.
k.
The proper operation of all ESF equipment is verified.
,
1.
The reset function of the ESF equipment is verified following the proper actuatius of the ESF equipment.
The procedure appears to adeqcetely fulfill-the requirements for an integrated system test with disabled power trains and blackout.
,
t i
J
_