|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARDCL-99-123, Comment on Prs 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Guidelines. Util Areas of Concern Includes ESF Actuations, Significantly Degraded Components & Historical Limitations1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment on Prs 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Guidelines. Util Areas of Concern Includes ESF Actuations, Significantly Degraded Components & Historical Limitations ML20205N4081999-04-14014 April 1999 Comments Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,19 & 20 Re Proposed Repository at Yucca Mountain.Requests Information on How Much Radiation Being Released Now at Diablo & Hanford NPPs ML20205N4601999-03-21021 March 1999 Introduces K Schumann as Representative of Nuclear Waste Committee (Nuwic) of San Lius Obispo County.Informs That Nuwic & Nuclear Waste Management Committee Concerned with Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Rods from Dcnpp ML20195E8841998-11-24024 November 1998 Petition for Mod to OLs to Require Plant Owner to Have Independent Contractor Evaluate Plant Safety Culture ML20236T3011998-07-24024 July 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Avtivities (Effective Immediately).Lh Brooks Prohibited for 5 Yrs from Date of Order from Engaging in NRC Licensed Activities ML20248C2261998-05-22022 May 1998 Comment Opposing Revised Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Protection & Safety Sys ML20129J4191996-10-18018 October 1996 Order Approving Application Re Corporate Restructuring of Pacific Gas & Electric Company by Establishment of Holding Company DCL-95-206, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Improving Fire Protection Regulations1995-10-0606 October 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Improving Fire Protection Regulations ML20091P8721995-08-23023 August 1995 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Nuclear Energy Institute Proposed Amends on Fire Safety for All NPPs DCL-95-001, Comment on Proposed Changes to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Rule 10CFR50.Endorses NEI Comments1995-01-0303 January 1995 Comment on Proposed Changes to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Rule 10CFR50.Endorses NEI Comments ML20077M7521994-12-30030 December 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operation for Nuclear Power Reactors DCL-94-270, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rulemaking for NPP License Renewal.Endorses Comments & Changes Proposed by NEI 941208 Submittal1994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rulemaking for NPP License Renewal.Endorses Comments & Changes Proposed by NEI 941208 Submittal ML20149H0851994-11-0404 November 1994 Initial Decision (Construction Period Recovery/Recapture).* Renewed Motion to Reopen Record 940808,denied.Served on 941104.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072L2651994-08-23023 August 1994 PG&E Opposition to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Renewed Motion to Reopen Record.* Util Opposes San Luis Obispo for Peace Motion Based on Affidavit Stating No Evidence Found in Motion Re Flaw in Program.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072F0291994-08-12012 August 1994 Erratum to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion to Reopen Record.* Intervenors Corrects Error in Renewed Motion to Reopen Record Re Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072B2651994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re FFD Requirements Concerning Random Drug Testing ML20072A5821994-08-0808 August 1994 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Renewed Motion to Reopen Record Re PG&E Application for Amend to Extend Term of OL for Plant.* Motion to Reopen Record to Introduce Insp Rept Identifying Alleged Problems W/Plant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20071L2061994-07-26026 July 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changing Current Drug Testing Policies to Exclude All Personnel in nonsafety-related Positions ML20072B8481994-07-26026 July 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to FFD Requirements Concerning Random Drug Testing ML20071L1901994-07-20020 July 1994 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Relaxing Rule on Drug Testing of Employees Working at NPP DCL-94-134, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-60 Re Amend to 10CFR50.54 by Changing Frequency W/Which Each Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Emergency Preparedness Program1994-06-27027 June 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-60 Re Amend to 10CFR50.54 by Changing Frequency W/Which Each Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Emergency Preparedness Program DCL-94-135, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR50.54(p) Concerning Frequency W/Which Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Security Programs1994-06-27027 June 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR50.54(p) Concerning Frequency W/Which Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Security Programs ML20064D1791994-03-0707 March 1994 Pacific Gas and Electric Co Reply in Opposition to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion to Reopen Record.* Motion to Reopen Record Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20064D1961994-03-0404 March 1994 Affidavit of Mj Angus Re Motion to Reopen Record ML20063L5721994-02-25025 February 1994 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Re Util Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.* Advises That Record of Proceeding Should Be Reopened to Consider Insp 93-36 Re Util Surveillance of Asw Sys DCL-94-021, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication Facilitation1994-01-26026 January 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication Facilitation ML20059D2431994-01-0707 January 1994 Package of Intervenor Exhibits Consisting of Related Correspondence Not Admitted Into Evidence.Related Correspondence ML20062N0001993-12-30030 December 1993 PG&E Reply Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.* Mothers for Peace Proposed Findings & Conclusions Do Not Provide Any Supportable Rationale to Change Findings & Conclusions Previously Proposed by Pg&E.W/Certificate of Svc ML20058P3931993-12-22022 December 1993 NRC Staff Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Initial Decision.* Certificate of Svc ML20058K7491993-12-0202 December 1993 NRC Staff Motion for Extension of Time.* Board Has Extended Filing Time for Util Until 931230.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 931206.Granted for Board on 931203 ML20058K8771993-12-0202 December 1993 NRC Staff Motion for Extension of Time.* Requests That Board Extend Date for Staff to File Findings Until 931222. W/Certificate of Svc ML20059M5291993-11-19019 November 1993 Applicant Exhibits A-21,A-22,A-24,A-25,A-26,A-29 & A-F1, Consisting of Related Correspondence Not Admitted Into Evidence.Related Correspondence ML20058E0741993-11-19019 November 1993 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Licensee Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.* W/ Certificate of Svc ML20059E8931993-10-28028 October 1993 Memorandum & Order (Motion for Extension of Time).* San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace 931018 Request for two-wk Extension of Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Granted.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931029 ML20059E8531993-10-27027 October 1993 NRC Staff Response to Board Memorandum & Order Re Extension of Time.* Staff Believes That San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Has Shown No Good Cause for Requesting Extension to File Proposed Findings of Fact.W/Certificate of Svc ML20059E8631993-10-25025 October 1993 Pacific Gas & Electric Co Response to Motion for Extension of Time.* Util Does Not Agree W/Board Assessment That Mothers for Peace Request Appears to Be Reasonable But Will Not Oppose Request.W/Certificate of Svc ML20059B2191993-10-19019 October 1993 Memorandum & Order (Responses to Motion for Extension of Time).* Board Believes Intervenor Request for Extension of Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact Appears Reasonable. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931019 ML20059B1071993-10-18018 October 1993 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Proposing Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.* Requests Extension of Two Wks or Until 931119 to File Proposed Findings of Fact.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057D0531993-09-23023 September 1993 Notice of Appearance.* Notice Given That Undersigned Attorney Enters Appearance in Listed Matter & Listed Info Provided.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057B0401993-09-14014 September 1993 NRC Staff Reply to PG&E Response to Staff Motion to Amend Protective Order.* NRC Staff Moves Board to Adopt Language Requested in 930817 Motion as Stated.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056G4891993-08-30030 August 1993 Pacific Gas & Electric Co Response to Motion to Amend Protective Order.* Staff Asks That Protective Order Be Clarified by Adding New Footnote to Paragraph 3 of Order. W/Certificate of Svc ML20059C7361993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-88,consisting of NRC Insp of Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2 IR 05000275/19920161993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-137,consisting of Insp Rept Re Dockets 50-275/92-16 & 50-323/92-16,dtd 920707 IR 05000275/19930111993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-26,consisting of Re Insp Repts 50-275/93-11 & 50-323/93-11 ML20059M1381993-08-24024 August 1993 Staff Exhibit S-1,consisting of Re 920519 Enforcement Conference IR 05000275/19920131993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-140,consisting of 920416,mgt Meeting Repts 50-275/92-13 & 50-323/92-13 ML20059D0841993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-139,consisting of Insp Rept Re Dockets 50-275 & 50-323,dtd 920417 IR 05000275/19920261993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-118,consisting of Notice of Violation & Insp Rept Re Docket 50-275/92-26 & 50-323/93-26,dtd 921113 ML20059M5041993-08-24024 August 1993 Staff Exhibit S-2,consisting of Re Notice of Violation ML20059M8621993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-35,consisting of Rept, Self- Evaluation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Dtd Jul 1993 1999-09-20
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20056F5491993-08-24024 August 1993 Transcript of 930824 Meeting Re Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2.Pp 2,025-2,295.Related Documentation Encl ML20056F3091993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,706-1,924 ML20056G1041993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Meeting in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re Facility.Pp 1,925-2,024 ML20056E4561993-08-21021 August 1993 Transcript of 930821 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,498-1,705 ML20056E4591993-08-20020 August 1993 Transcript of 930820 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,266-1,497 ML20056E4661993-08-19019 August 1993 Transcript of 930819 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,053-1,265 ML20056F3721993-08-17017 August 1993 Transcript of 930817 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 569-747 ML20046C5511993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention I:Maint & Surveillance.* Exhibits Encl.Related Correspondence ML20046C5551993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention V:Thermo-Lag Compensatory Measures.* Related Correspondence ML20125E2401992-12-11011 December 1992 Transcript of 921211 Dcnpp,Units 1 & 2 Public Meeting (Construction Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca. Pp 352-406 ML20125D5731992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2) Const Period Facility Ols,Recapture DPR-80 & DPR-82.Pp 1-217 ML20125E2591992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Public Meeting (Const Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca.Pp 218-351 ML20147B3431988-02-24024 February 1988 Transcript of ACRS 880224 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 260-416 ML20147B3001988-02-23023 February 1988 Corrected Transcript of ACRS 880223 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 1-259 ML20238D2351987-09-22022 September 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Cg Gray Re Storage of Radwaste at Brink of Major Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4721987-07-18018 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by H Hubbard Re Util Proposal to Increase Amount of Spent Fuel Storage.Proposal Supported ML20238D1181987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Martin Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D4831987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Santa Maria Valley Developers,Inc Re Proposed Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools at Plant.Plan Supported ML20238D8151987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by N Wilson Re Expansion of Nuclear Waste Storage Pools & Use of Fuel Racks.Plan Opposed ML20238D3071987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gn Uratsu Re Util Application to Increase Spent Fuel Storage Capacity of Spent Fuel Pools at Facility.Approval Requested ML20238D8771987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CR Stone Supporting Util Proposal for Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools to Allow Continued Plant Operation While DOE Provides Permanent Repository for Spent Fuel ML20238D4791987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gr Kerr Re Reracking of Spent Fuel.Rationale Discussed ML20238D4891987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Lauer Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools.Util Proposal Supported ML20238D4501987-07-13013 July 1987 Unsigned Limited Appearance Statement Re Expansion of Waste Site at Facility.Proposed Expansion Opposed ML20238D4561987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Bakula Re Plan to Store Radwaste at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D8671987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hs Davis Re Increase in Onsite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel.Proposal to Replace Racks Will Increase Storage Capacity to Roughly 19 Yrs ML20238D5301987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by D Carvalho Re Storage of Nuclear Waste Next to Active Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4341987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by G Parker Re Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1011987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by a Krause Objecting to Waste Storage at Facility ML20238D2881987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by K,B & Fuller,Objecting to Storage of More Spent Fuel Rods than Facility Designed to Handle at Unstable Geological Location ML20238D2111987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hutchinson Re Opposition to Radwaste Storage Plans ML20238D2161987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Alexander Re Storage of Nuclear Wastes at Plant ML20238D1371987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D0071987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dp & Wa Rhoderick Re Storage of Wastes at Plant ML20238D1251987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Johnson Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D3731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dk Clogston Re Storage of Radwaste at Plant in Potentially Unsafe Containers Near Fault Line ML20238D2511987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by F Richardson Opposing Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D0731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Jenefsky & L Morishita Opposing Permanent Waste Storage at Plant ML20238D4771987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Wl Denneen Re Storage of Nuclear Waste at Plant ML20238D2681987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Ef Andrisek Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8561987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CF Martinez Re Installation of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Used to Store Spent Fuel Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1571987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Objecting to Plan to Permit Increase in Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant ML20238D2801987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hw Barbarick Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8061987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Re Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D4401987-07-0303 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Warren Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools.No Viable Alternative Exists Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D8271987-07-0202 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Hobson Re Plant Reracking Proposal.Plan Supported ML20238D8211987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Rs Jolivette Re Reracking of Plant Spent Fuel Pools.Plan Supported ML20238D2991987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by B Griffin Re Dissatisfaction W/Proposed Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D1361987-06-29029 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Re Expanded Fuel Storage at Plant 1993-08-24
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20056F5491993-08-24024 August 1993 Transcript of 930824 Meeting Re Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2.Pp 2,025-2,295.Related Documentation Encl ML20056F3091993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,706-1,924 ML20056G1041993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Meeting in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re Facility.Pp 1,925-2,024 ML20056E4561993-08-21021 August 1993 Transcript of 930821 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,498-1,705 ML20056E4591993-08-20020 August 1993 Transcript of 930820 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,266-1,497 ML20056E4661993-08-19019 August 1993 Transcript of 930819 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,053-1,265 ML20056F3721993-08-17017 August 1993 Transcript of 930817 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 569-747 ML20046C5511993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention I:Maint & Surveillance.* Exhibits Encl.Related Correspondence ML20046C5551993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention V:Thermo-Lag Compensatory Measures.* Related Correspondence ML20125E2401992-12-11011 December 1992 Transcript of 921211 Dcnpp,Units 1 & 2 Public Meeting (Construction Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca. Pp 352-406 ML20125D5731992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2) Const Period Facility Ols,Recapture DPR-80 & DPR-82.Pp 1-217 ML20125E2591992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Public Meeting (Const Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca.Pp 218-351 ML20147B3431988-02-24024 February 1988 Transcript of ACRS 880224 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 260-416 ML20147B3001988-02-23023 February 1988 Corrected Transcript of ACRS 880223 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 1-259 ML20238D2351987-09-22022 September 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Cg Gray Re Storage of Radwaste at Brink of Major Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4721987-07-18018 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by H Hubbard Re Util Proposal to Increase Amount of Spent Fuel Storage.Proposal Supported ML20238D1181987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Martin Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D4831987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Santa Maria Valley Developers,Inc Re Proposed Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools at Plant.Plan Supported ML20238D8151987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by N Wilson Re Expansion of Nuclear Waste Storage Pools & Use of Fuel Racks.Plan Opposed ML20238D3071987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gn Uratsu Re Util Application to Increase Spent Fuel Storage Capacity of Spent Fuel Pools at Facility.Approval Requested ML20238D8771987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CR Stone Supporting Util Proposal for Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools to Allow Continued Plant Operation While DOE Provides Permanent Repository for Spent Fuel ML20238D4791987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gr Kerr Re Reracking of Spent Fuel.Rationale Discussed ML20238D4891987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Lauer Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools.Util Proposal Supported ML20238D4501987-07-13013 July 1987 Unsigned Limited Appearance Statement Re Expansion of Waste Site at Facility.Proposed Expansion Opposed ML20238D4561987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Bakula Re Plan to Store Radwaste at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D8671987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hs Davis Re Increase in Onsite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel.Proposal to Replace Racks Will Increase Storage Capacity to Roughly 19 Yrs ML20238D5301987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by D Carvalho Re Storage of Nuclear Waste Next to Active Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4341987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by G Parker Re Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1011987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by a Krause Objecting to Waste Storage at Facility ML20238D2881987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by K,B & Fuller,Objecting to Storage of More Spent Fuel Rods than Facility Designed to Handle at Unstable Geological Location ML20238D2111987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hutchinson Re Opposition to Radwaste Storage Plans ML20238D2161987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Alexander Re Storage of Nuclear Wastes at Plant ML20238D1371987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D0071987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dp & Wa Rhoderick Re Storage of Wastes at Plant ML20238D1251987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Johnson Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D3731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dk Clogston Re Storage of Radwaste at Plant in Potentially Unsafe Containers Near Fault Line ML20238D2511987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by F Richardson Opposing Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D0731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Jenefsky & L Morishita Opposing Permanent Waste Storage at Plant ML20238D4771987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Wl Denneen Re Storage of Nuclear Waste at Plant ML20238D2681987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Ef Andrisek Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8561987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CF Martinez Re Installation of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Used to Store Spent Fuel Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1571987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Objecting to Plan to Permit Increase in Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant ML20238D2801987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hw Barbarick Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8061987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Re Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D4401987-07-0303 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Warren Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools.No Viable Alternative Exists Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D8271987-07-0202 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Hobson Re Plant Reracking Proposal.Plan Supported ML20238D8211987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Rs Jolivette Re Reracking of Plant Spent Fuel Pools.Plan Supported ML20238D2991987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by B Griffin Re Dissatisfaction W/Proposed Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D1361987-06-29029 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Re Expanded Fuel Storage at Plant 1993-08-24
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20056F5491993-08-24024 August 1993 Transcript of 930824 Meeting Re Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2.Pp 2,025-2,295.Related Documentation Encl ML20056F3091993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,706-1,924 ML20056G1041993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Meeting in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re Facility.Pp 1,925-2,024 ML20056E4561993-08-21021 August 1993 Transcript of 930821 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,498-1,705 ML20056E4591993-08-20020 August 1993 Transcript of 930820 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,266-1,497 ML20056E4661993-08-19019 August 1993 Transcript of 930819 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,053-1,265 ML20056F3721993-08-17017 August 1993 Transcript of 930817 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 569-747 ML20046C5511993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention I:Maint & Surveillance.* Exhibits Encl.Related Correspondence ML20046C5551993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention V:Thermo-Lag Compensatory Measures.* Related Correspondence ML20125E2401992-12-11011 December 1992 Transcript of 921211 Dcnpp,Units 1 & 2 Public Meeting (Construction Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca. Pp 352-406 ML20125D5731992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2) Const Period Facility Ols,Recapture DPR-80 & DPR-82.Pp 1-217 ML20125E2591992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Public Meeting (Const Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca.Pp 218-351 ML20147B3431988-02-24024 February 1988 Transcript of ACRS 880224 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 260-416 ML20147B3001988-02-23023 February 1988 Corrected Transcript of ACRS 880223 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 1-259 ML20238D2351987-09-22022 September 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Cg Gray Re Storage of Radwaste at Brink of Major Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4721987-07-18018 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by H Hubbard Re Util Proposal to Increase Amount of Spent Fuel Storage.Proposal Supported ML20238D1181987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Martin Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D4831987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Santa Maria Valley Developers,Inc Re Proposed Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools at Plant.Plan Supported ML20238D8151987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by N Wilson Re Expansion of Nuclear Waste Storage Pools & Use of Fuel Racks.Plan Opposed ML20238D3071987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gn Uratsu Re Util Application to Increase Spent Fuel Storage Capacity of Spent Fuel Pools at Facility.Approval Requested ML20238D8771987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CR Stone Supporting Util Proposal for Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools to Allow Continued Plant Operation While DOE Provides Permanent Repository for Spent Fuel ML20238D4791987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gr Kerr Re Reracking of Spent Fuel.Rationale Discussed ML20238D4891987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Lauer Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools.Util Proposal Supported ML20238D4501987-07-13013 July 1987 Unsigned Limited Appearance Statement Re Expansion of Waste Site at Facility.Proposed Expansion Opposed ML20238D4561987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Bakula Re Plan to Store Radwaste at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D8671987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hs Davis Re Increase in Onsite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel.Proposal to Replace Racks Will Increase Storage Capacity to Roughly 19 Yrs ML20238D5301987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by D Carvalho Re Storage of Nuclear Waste Next to Active Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4341987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by G Parker Re Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1011987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by a Krause Objecting to Waste Storage at Facility ML20238D2881987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by K,B & Fuller,Objecting to Storage of More Spent Fuel Rods than Facility Designed to Handle at Unstable Geological Location ML20238D2111987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hutchinson Re Opposition to Radwaste Storage Plans ML20238D2161987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Alexander Re Storage of Nuclear Wastes at Plant ML20238D1371987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D0071987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dp & Wa Rhoderick Re Storage of Wastes at Plant ML20238D1251987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Johnson Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D3731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dk Clogston Re Storage of Radwaste at Plant in Potentially Unsafe Containers Near Fault Line ML20238D2511987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by F Richardson Opposing Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D0731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Jenefsky & L Morishita Opposing Permanent Waste Storage at Plant ML20238D4771987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Wl Denneen Re Storage of Nuclear Waste at Plant ML20238D2681987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Ef Andrisek Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8561987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CF Martinez Re Installation of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Used to Store Spent Fuel Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1571987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Objecting to Plan to Permit Increase in Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant ML20238D2801987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hw Barbarick Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8061987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Re Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D4401987-07-0303 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Warren Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools.No Viable Alternative Exists Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D8271987-07-0202 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Hobson Re Plant Reracking Proposal.Plan Supported ML20238D8211987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Rs Jolivette Re Reracking of Plant Spent Fuel Pools.Plan Supported ML20238D2991987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by B Griffin Re Dissatisfaction W/Proposed Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D1361987-06-29029 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Re Expanded Fuel Storage at Plant 1993-08-24
[Table view] |
Text
- --
.eh /r & t '
o ' !i
'l l UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 . ---
4 STATUS OF NTOLs 5 - --
6 CLOSED MEETING - EXEMPTIONS 5 & 7 7 ---
8 Room 1130 1717 H Street, N.W.
9 Washington, D.C.
10 Monday, October 22, 1984 11 The Commission reconvened, pursuant to recess, at 12 3:48 p.m. .
l 13 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
14 NUNZIO PALLADINO, Chairman of the Commission THOMAS ROBERTS, Commissioner 15 JAMES ASSELSTINE, Commissioner FREDERICH BERNTHAL, Commissioner ,
16 LANDO ZECH, Commissioner 17 STAFF AND PRESENTERS SEATED AT COMMISSION TABLE:
18 S. CHILK B. HAYES
- 19 H. DENTON G. MESSENGER 20 S. CONNELLY 21 AUDIENCE SPEAKERS:
Information in this record was deleted 22 E. EISENHUT i9 accor&are with the f 23 B. COTTER kt,
'9- a tg"[nons __7Cctl5B 6-D Ik]1 .. qudm of 24 25 i
8903100593 890301 f PDR FDIA I '
SCHMIEGBB-229 PDR_ -
33 1- ' COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: I' agree with you.
~
2 MR. HAYES: Well,.1ike I'say, we have not 3 expended any resources, it's just' in a holding pattern.
4 COMMISSIONER ZECH: You sent'somebody up there.
5 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: You sent somebody up there, you had'an appointment.
6' 7 MR. HAYES: Yes. I'm saying after the declination C
8 we have not expended any resources on this investigation.
9 There is no. place to send them unless counsel allows their 10 client to meet with us. So, we haven't done anything except 11 gotten~the turndown.
12 l COMMISSIONER ZECH: You' shouldn' t do anything.
l' Thank you.
14 MR. HAYES: The next is Region V, Diablo Canyon.
16 We have 15 investigative matters at Diablo Canyon.
16 COMMISSIONER ASSELSTINE: One or two?
17 MR. HAYES: I'm sorry, I don't draw a distinction 18 between one and two.
19 COMMISSIONER ASSELSTINE: Okay.
20 MR. HAYES: Fifteen matters involving approximately 21 130 allegations enveloped within these 15 investigative l'
22 matters.
23 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: A hundred-thirty eight.
24 MR. HAYES: N liundred and thirty, approximately, 25 the number of allegations that have been referred to us.
i
34
. 1 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: What 's the dif ference 2 b.stween a matter and an allegation. Is one just a subject
(
3 and the other specific?
4 MR. HAYES: Yes, they are the same. Investigations ,
A what we try to do is that if we get numerous allegations 6
involving one particular system of falsification in a given 7
area, then we open up one investigation and put all the 8 calegations in that particular hopper, similar to what the 9 staff does in trying to look at the systemic nature of to problems as opposed to specific allegations.
11 MR. DENTON: Let me mention one, Ben, that is a 12 little different- from the ones you have been talking about, 13 involving PG&E, that we asked 3en if he might want to look 14 into.
15 The company and their attorney informed Jack 16 Martin and I that one of their employees has become aware 17 that GAP was perhaps offering rewards for information that 18 could lead to the suspension of Diablo Canyon.
19 l
CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: To what?
20 MR. DENTON: Information leading to a suspension l
21 of the license S , hi divjdual r po g contract 22 signes by a You remember a of TMI. And 23 they offered him I think, $10,000 or $20,000 if they 1
24 revealed hir identity and $60,000 if the information he had 25 led to suspension of the license.
g 35 l, 4
1 Well, it didn't lead to a suspension of the 2 license and apparently hear. quarters did not agree with the 3 field office, apparently. And then he went to the company 4 to try to sell them the information.
5 So, the com pany told us about it and I asked 6 ELD -- Qjfk $X.]{ )
7 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: went to the company?
8 MR. DENTON: No, this ind v 1 --
9 this individual had a contract wi 10 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS; He said he had a contract.
11 MR. DENTON: He said he ha ,c,p n c M, .
12 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Wit -
13 MR. DENTON: And' the contract had been shwon to 14 the company's lawyer. But the contract was not given to
'15 PG&E's lawyer but he showed a copy of the contract when he 16 was trying to sell this information to PG&E.
17 Well, it smelled awkward to me --
18 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Yes. ,,
1 19 MR. DENTON: -- that he was offering large sums 1
20 of money for such information because an important worker 21 could look the other way during an important test or 22 operation that caused a safety problem.
J 23 So, I asked ELD and OI to advise me on that 24 matter and I guess we couldn't find any criminal statutes 25 were violated because someone is offering sums of money for f
l t
36
. 1 such information, and I did refer that one to Ben just 2 because I though'. it was something that we should follow up 3 on, even though it apparently does not violate any criminal 4 statutes.
& COMMISSIONER ZECH: I hope you'll look into that j i 6 one.
7 .
CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Yes.
8 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: Well, I want to see if I 9 understood what you said. PG&E's lawyer claims to have 10 seen this?
11 MR. DENTON: Yes.
12 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: To have seen the contract.
13 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: Ind does he attest to the 14 fact that --
15 MR. DENTON: He said it was obviously written by 16 an attorney, it was a good contract, it had all the right 17 language in it, except it had blanks for this individual's 18 n ame . So, granted, apparently the same contract could be 19 used for different individuals. So, you fill in the name of 20 the person. But it was not an improper contract.
21 But the company didn' t know what to do with this 22 information. The employee no longer works for PG&E, and that 23 he was one of the construction workers and as the plant was 24 completed, it turns out he has been terminated or laid of f 25 since this got started. But it wasn't related to this activity,
n 4 , .
37 i
p .'
1' just that his work was completed. l t
2 So,.it did strike me as odd that people are 3 buying information and willing to pay such large sums.
p 4 Howeve r, at the same time, you know, if it were valid 5 information we would have acted on it. But it turns out this 6 particular information was made available to us and it did .
!. 1 7 not represent a big safety problem. j i
8 COMMISSIONER BERNTHAL: On the one hand, it seems l i
9 to me that could be taken in the category of offering a 10 reward for information leading to, which'is very commonly 11 done.
12 But somehow it strikes me that that really subverts 13 the process that we are about here. And again, I would think 14 we'ought to look at that, and there may -- if in fact that 15 practice is established, I don't know what's going on here '
16 in terms of trying to get.the facts. But that 's some thing, it 17 seems to me, the Congress ought to be made aware of.
18 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: Is the PG&E attorney 19 in-house?
20 MR. DENTON: No, the attorney was Mr. Norton who --
21 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: Oh, yes, we know who Mr.
\
22 Norton is.
I 2 (Laugh te r) 24 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: These individuals are placing f 26 themselves in a situation of withholding information that l'l
.: i
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - 1
38 1
. relates to the public health and safety. Now, I don't know 2 whether there is any leverage from that standpoint.or not.
3 MR. MALSCH: Well, we can certainly subpoena them, 4 I mean, if they have health and safety information. Moreover, s I would have to say that someone who is only willing to speak 6 if he is . paid a certain amount of mon'ey is therefore l 7 damaging his own credibility, you know.
8 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: What do you subpoena him to, 9 a Board hearing? ,
10 MR. MALSCH: To appear before NRC investigators 11 and divulge the safety information -- he has no right to 12 insist to us that he not divulge safety information until we 13 pay him some fee. He has an obligation, . if he is subpoenaed, 14 to come forth and give whatever relevant information is 15 called for.in the document, in the subpoena. And we have 16 the authority, the broad authority, to issue subpoenaes.
17 We don't do it very often, but we have very broad 18 authority to do that. .
19 MR. DENTON: In this case we did find out what 20 the information was -- I have forgotten .all the details --
21 and did look into it, and it was "ot significant safety 22 information.
23 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Well, I think we ought to be 24 alert, though, to a situation'wh'ere we have a good case to !
1 l
25 bring the individual in under subpoena to give the information
}
I
- 39 1 they have, or she has.
2 MR. DENTON: I think it's the only exception 3 to referring to Ben instances of wrong-doing about the l
company. I can't tell the company did anything wrong in l 4
5 this case, they came to us pretty quickly af ter they had
} 6 their first meeting.
7 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Is that something that the 8 Department of Justice would be interested in?
9 MR. HAYES: Well, in our look at the matter and 10 the reading of Harold's memorandum to me explaining the 11 situation, we can find really very little jurisdiction for 12 the Commission except that the information should be made 13 available to us , which it already was ,
14 I did take the liberty on my last trip to 15 San Francisco two weeks ago to attempt to get in touch with 16 executives of PG&E in hopes that I could sit down with them 17 and get more detail on the matter, but they were not 18 available . .
19 COMMISSIONER ZECH: If it's true, though , if it 20 really is true and we are convinced it.is true, that story 21 ought to be told. That ought to get out to the press, you 22 know, something like that. I think we'd have to check with 23 our lawyers on it to make'sure we are not doing something 24 improper, but that's a story that should be told.
25 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Well, PG&E is a good place
40 I.
i ,
1 for'them to begin.
i '
L 2 COMMISSIONER ZECH: It ought to get out.
l 3 Something like that is something, it seems to.me, that the 4 public has the right to..know about it, N '
s CHAIRMAN PALLADLNO: Okay. Well, do you have 6 more on Region V?
7 MR. HAYES: Palo Verde. We have three 8 investigative matters at Palo Verde. One of those is in 9 my office for review and the other two will be done prior to to year end -- falsification matters, intimidation matters, 11 that sort of thing.
12 So, we hope to conclude those by year end.
i l
13 CHAIRMAN PAILADINO: Now, what about your resource '
l 14 matter? When you and I talked, you had some ideas. I 15 .
MR. HAYES: Yes. I brought to the Chairman's 16 attention a week ago in preparation of this. particular 17 Commission meeting the fact that we had in excess of 130-some 18 investigations. As you may or may not know, these 19 investigations basically come from the staff. They are 20 referred to us from the staff for investigation.
21 We self-initiate very few investigative matters.
22 And right now we have on board less than twenty investigators ,
23 exclusive of my five managers that I have in the field. Some 24 of those managers are carrying investigations themselves in 26 hopes of expediting the investigative process.
52 9
1 on the licensing schedule.
2 CHAIRMAN.PALLADINO: Well, let's see whst other V
3 plonts you have here.
4 MS. CONNELLY: We have Midland, Diablo Canyon,
-5 Comanche Peak.
6 COMMISSIONER BERNTHAL: Midland is kind of " water 7 under the bridge."
8 ' CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Diablo Canyon, what's your 9 comment on this? I don't read very rapidly.
~, 10 MS. CONNELLY: All right, let me just cover 11 Diablo Canyon and Comanche Peak. ,
12 We have no on-going investigations involving 13 Diablo Canyon, but I would like to note that Commissioner
(
14 Asselstine has asked that the Commission direct OIA to re-15 open our investigation of alleged misleading or material 16 f alse statements by the NRC staff.
17 Commissioner Asselstine stated that his' concern So, we 18 is to assure that the Commission has all the f acts.
19 are waiting to see what the action of the Commissohn will 20 be with respect to --
21 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: I don't know if the i
22 action is complete, but I thought it was. I thought a l
23 majority had said to include this as part of your normal 24 audit activities.
25 MS. CONNELLY: That's another issue, Mr. Chairman f
y - ~ ~
l 53
($/ Sk
. 1 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: That 's Enother issue?g j 2- MS. CONNELLY: That involves t.h e 3 letter to Commissioner Zech. That's the second item we 4 have under Diablo Canyon.
6 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Well, what's this one, then, 6 that you are talking about? l 1
7 MS. CONNELLY: This was a 2.206 petition, an 8 investigate'on that we conducted as to whether or not there 9 were misleading and material false statements by the NRC
', 10 staff to the Commission during the March 19, 16 or 27 briefinc 11 or in supplemental safety evaluation' reports issued in 12 December '83 and in March '84. -
MR. MESSENGER: That was briefed at the open
({ 13
. 14 hearing. That was the report that was issued when you 15 voted for the full power license. That was the investigation 16 report. j l
17 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Well, I'll have to check 18 my memory and check the status.
19 MR. MESSENGER: But that's the one that l 20 Corrmissioner Asselstine, I think, when he voted made the 21 statement that he had some concerns on that, on the vote ,for 22 full power.
23 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: On the proper conduct of 24 some of our people in Region V?
)
25 MR. MESSENGER: Right. I think it was going back l
i
- _--___ ________ - _ _ A
3 1 rather than taking the statem nts made by Devina to go back 2 and interview allegers. I th .nk th a t 's -- i 8 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Well, <ne check where 4 we stand on that. You are not doing anything yet on that. l 1
5 MR. MESSENGER: No, we are awaiting the decision l
- . l 6 resulting from Commissioner Asselstine's memo to the 7 rest of the Commissioners.
8 "' CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Sam, are you following this 8
one?
'. 10 MR. CHILK: I must be . I'm not familiar with it.
II CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Will'you check, then let us 12 know where we stand.
13 COMMISSIONER BERNTHAL: Did we not even decide 14 yet to give Region V a chance to respond --
16 That's what I'm trying to CHAIRMAN PALLADINO:
16 find out.
17 COMMISSIONER BERNTHAL: -- first to those questions' 18 I mean, that was my vote that we would do that before moving It seems to me they in fairness deserve a chance
~
I8 f a rther.
" to tell their side of the story.
MS. CONNELLY: Commissioner Bernthal, I believe those ]
that that is the ipsue, i5A EX. 7 ($) the issues that were raised from the letter to Commissioner Zech. ]
COMMISSIONER BERNTHAL: You are right, you are 25 right.
l l
n
55 1 MS. CONNI:LLY : That's a separate issue. And we 2 have an audit on-gcing now of allegation management, And 3 what we had proposed to do was to incorporate those allegation 4 into our audit.
5 They were very broad. There wasn't anything 6 specific that we could really conduct our investigation with 7 respect to. So, we are treating it as part of the audit.
8 ' COMMISSIONER BERNTHAL: Okay.
9 MR. MESSENGER: I have the other one here, it 's 10 the letter from Commissioner Asselstine to the other 11 Commissioners, dated September 7, 1984, COMJA-84-7 is the 12 control number. It's Item No. 3.
i 13 CdAIRMAN PALLADINO: Okay. Why don't we have ,
14 SECY check ca our responses to th a t ., and we will be back to you 16 All right?
16 MS. CONNELLY: All right, then the last item 17 with respect to Comanche Peak, we have two investigations 18 which involve alleged breach of confidentiality. One 19 involves an allegation that Region IV released an Office of 20 Investigations report containing the names of persons 21 provided in confidence to the investigator by a former 22 intervenor, and the other investigation involves an allegation 23 that the name of the source who was promised confidentiality 24 was released when an NRC employee's NFE notes were made e
M public.
f, l
- r. ;
O'M E LVE N Y & MYERS l ** *v'"**"5'"*' 1 I
...tats
."",,'TJ. ".', ?o" " .. .
- wow,isos LOS ANGELES. CALTORNIA 900712899
.........,o.......-
w.wpoo,.cacn o .aa.
,.m.
...... e 3 343o.o... . . . . , '{
l ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..,m., ...;,
, ,,,,, ,3.g.wia cau,.. , 3..,,
.e. g g.
. t?," *?;L, seg. YO.M. NE. v0 2 co88 4.H
,.m......................., ,o ... .; ..... l koNDoM EC2. #LA
,sktowo.ws saisi sa.-sooo ,s6spuom o+-as. .
.m..... .. . ......
i April ,*c
- w. .. e..cau,.....
., 7 ........,.....
e..,
6th im o u. no.
'*" *1',', .'L"* '" 1988 ov riteav=.ca
..., ... ....e,o.46mu ... 644,330-005 (415) 768-0300 EREEDOM OF INFORMATION T REQUEST Director, Office of Administration tf8 'M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
'- d# h~ [=g Re: Freedom of Information Act Reauest To Whom It May Concern:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 USC Section 552 et seq.) and implementing regulation 10 CFR 9, subpart A, we requcat that you furnish the documents identified in the attached FOIA request.
In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 9.14, we are prepared to pay fees necessarily incurred in responding to this request.
1 If you should have any questions regarding the '
request, please contact the undersigned at the direct dial number listed above. Your prompt attention to this request will be greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours, h.S Patricia A. Schmiege for O'MELVENY & MYERS PAS:dm 1
Enclosure j l
1 4
Q (') f *} A & A A An mir D4A 4( W4Wl J
FOIA REQUEST For all closed sessions and/or meetings of the Commissioners of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission held bet *een January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1985 at which Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant was discussed or mentioned in any respect, please provide a copy of the transcript of such sessions and/or meetings, as well as all memoranda and notation votes which relate in any manner to such sessions and/or meetings. .
l i
l
)
l l
J