ML20197B612

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:50, 9 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of 781020 NRC Ltr.Repeats Opposition to cross- Examination Procedures of ACRS Consultants in Licensing Proc
ML20197B612
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 10/27/1978
From: Crane P
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 7811080040
Download: ML20197B612 (1)


Text

/ ,

hk55MS)E NRC PUBLIC DOCULIENT ROOM 0

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECT 1%IC C O M PANY J @ . m. w -. '

i 77 BEALE .T R E ET, 31 ST F L OO R

  • SAN FR AN CISC O, C ALIFO R NI A 94106 * (415) 781 4211 dOHN C. MO R RlS 6 E Y o..,._sy. , ..y,. s . g 7,.j, ;.e o ..e.

-:c ..cx ca .o oc.cm comu October 27, 1978 e.:.:.r.. . ., : *.ef o. u.f. ."... e.t.. .t.v.:.r.;..

c. 6 ...

M A L c o tu M. ru n e u s M " * ' " " ' * * "

  • associaf E ot=t.46 c ou.st 6 g ** " g* .**f ' fl,, g , ,8 8,'J a, .g" .,* * '*.
  • c , a a s e a v. v a ~ o e u . e ~

V.. *".,; l'*.*:: **:.':' ' "i.;..*:n. ,,. .

  • -.L,a*.ca4~r.sa g.,. c, g .g. .. . .. . ., . . .; .g,

-e~=vs.c.au4~te .

g . , y,.g,,,, ,,,, ,

aic.Aao..cLaane  ;.7.j. . .,. y. .,.. .

y,.,.,,..gg.,,........ g.g 3;3.,

ao-~ e.eieeo~ . . . , . , . , , . , . . ,. , . . . j, ; .,., 63. ..,.,,,

.a1-vac.-iu .~ s . g,;.,.g ; ., ,.g. .....

ae ae av e-6 mae- . g . .,,s. . ..... . , ,

.,.,7. .,,.,.g m.... .g ..,. . . .., ,., ,.;;..

c-.te.- r,....u . ... .;.. .. .................

.,...........u...t. ........

N' f *)

Mr. Samuel J. Chilk Secretary of the Commission d gg A U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

Washington, D. C. 20555 lh

~

OC T31 1978 >j 6 % l1 t'%"

Re: Docket No. 50-275-OL I Docket No. 5 0-3 2 3 --O L 5**

Ok?

b -.*

Dear Mr. Chilk:

m Thank you for your. letter dated October 20, 1978 giving us the opportunity'to comment on the matter of cross-examination of ACRS consultants in licensing proceedings. We are strongly opposed to this procedure for the reasons outlined in the ACRS statement attached to your letter. We believe this persuasive statement is dispositive of the matter and have nothing to add.

Very truly yours, m

ausd

\

&+O, l ff//Df60t'd