ML20206N676

Rev 6 to Procedure TNE-DC-15, Preparation of Equipment Qualification Documentation. Related Documents Encl

ML20206N676
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	02/11/1986
From:	TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20206N354	List: ML20206N349 ML20206N386 ML20206N439 ML20206N472 ML20206N508 ML20206N521 ML20206N545 ML20206N600 ML20206N654 ML20206N676
References
FOIA-86-270, FOIA-86-A-87 TNE-DC-15, NUDOCS 8607010500
Download: ML20206N676 (70)

Text

r m

$ $ o, Asau

%~ M

'y2 g m.G&M xcucoq RXIO PAJC14AR ENGINEERING PRDCEDURE REVISIOb ISSUE PAGE

%r TL(Gcc;

~

CPSES D4TE -

hrulafenmation Only wE-DC-is s

/

2/uf86 i e 22 AP

• /g"f' PREPARATION & D]UIPMWT PREPARED BY / p 03ALIFICATION EDCuimfATION .e' APPROVED BY , T f/" '

f' f 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 PURIOSE tis procedure establishes the basic guidelines for review of all CPSES vendor Gass IE qualification docunentaticri. l 1.2 SCOPE his procedure shall a@ly to the review of CPSES vendor qualification docunentation in accordance with the refer-ences listed in Section 1.4.

1.3 REPONSIBILITIES he Assistant tenager, %KCO thelear Engineerirg (TNd), shall have overall responsibility for review ard approval of equipnent qualification for CPSES. Wat responsibility has been delegated to the Project Discipline Supervisor, Protection ard Malysis. he review ard a@roval cycle shall include concurrence frcxn TU300 Nuclear Operations (20) .

1.4 REFERENCES

a. IEEE Std. 323-1974 "IEEE Stardard for QJalifying Gass 1E E%1uipnent for Nuclear Ibwer Generatiry Stations."

b. Ngulatory Gaide 1.89, dated tbvenber 1974,

" Qualification of Cass 1E Equipnent for Nuclear Ibwer Plants."

c. NUREG-0588 " Interim Staff Ibsition on Ehvironnental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipnent."

d. CPSES FSAR Section 3.11B "Ehvironnental Design of Mechanical and Electrical Equipuent."

e. IEEE Std. 344-197s "IEEE Mcortnended Practices for Seisnic Qualification of. Cass 1E Equipnent for Nuclear Power Generatirg Stations" (as erdorsed by Ibgulatory Guide 1.100).

8607010500 860624 M PDR FOIA GARDE 86-A-87 PDR L

a

~ .

'IUGCO 14JCIEAR DGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISICE ISSUE PAGE CPSES EATE tw:.mrWflUh Ut' tJJU 1H?lt.Ns QJALIFICATION IXILMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 2 & 22

f. IEEE Std. 317-1976 "IEEE Stardard for Electrical Penetration Msemblies in Cbntainmenti Structures for Nuclear Ibwer Generatirg Stations" (as erdorse$ by Regulatory Gaide 1.63).

g. IEEE Std. 334-1974 "IEEE Standard for Type 'Ibsts of Contintous Duty Gass IE letors for Nuclear Power Generatirg Stations" (as endorsed by Begulatory G2ide 1.40).

h. IEEE Std. 391-1977 " Standard Criteria for Type 'Ibsts of Class IE Modules used in Nuclear Ibwer Generating Stations".

i. IEEE Std. 382-1972 "IEEE Trial-Use G2ide for 'Iype Test of Class 1 Electric Valve Operators for Nuclear Ibwer Generatify Stations" (as endorsed by Ibgulatory Gaide 1.73).

j. IEEE Std. 383-1977 " Standard for 'Ibst of Cass 1E Electric Cables, Field Splices, Connections for Nuclear Ibwer Generatirq Stations (as erdorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.131).

k. IEEE Std. 337-1977 " Standard Critetia for Diesel Generator thits Applied As Standby Ibwr Supplies For Nuclear Generatirg Stations" (as erdersed by Begulatory Guide 1.9).

1. 2323-SS-20 " Seismic Ociteria for Equipnent Design" l m. 10CFR50.49 l l

2.0 PRCCEDURE - CIASS lE ECUIPME:ff

'Ihe Reviewr, to be assigned by the Project Discipline Supervisor, Protection & Analysis, shall be faniliar with the requirements and provisions of the References in Section 1.4 ard have rea$y access to capies of these materials. In addition, the Reviewr should be familiar with ard have available the latest edition of the purchase specification and diarges thereto for the equipment trder review. Section 2 of this procedure refers to coupletion of the doctanentation l review form (Equipnent Q2alification Checklist), Attachment 1. i tore: Where different types of categories of equipnent are cotered mder the same specification but were l

l L

EXIO NUCIEAR DGINEERING PROCEEIJRE REVISIG ISSUE PAGE CPSES DWIE PREPARATION & EQUlmENT GJALIFICATION 00CtMENTATIUN 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 3 & 22 qualifie$ separately, with unique reports subnitta3 for each, individual qualification reviews shall be couplete$ for each. When more than one review focn applies to a given specification, they shall be identified. Ebr example, if specification MS-34 required 3 separate review foons, tney shall be identified in the Retiew Ebem Identification section of Attachnent 1, as $-034 (1 of 3) MS-034 (2 of 3),

aM MS-034 (3 of 3) .

2.1 EQUImENT/DOCLMENIATION IDENTIFIC ' ION Part A of Attachnent 1, identifies the equipnent ard the applicable docunentation.

2.1.1 Specification Nurber Identify the G&H, Westinghouse, or 'INE specification nuncer when availeble, or Westingtuuse identif ter nunber, for the equipment trr3er review, e.g. E5-010, MS-600, $-020B.1, HE-8,

'INES-5, e*.c.

2.1.2 Vendor Verrior refers to the primary equipnent vendor. If same conjonents of the equipnent were purchased fran sub/endors an$ gaalified separately by the subvendor, then tk subvendor sinuld be indicate $ next to the appropriate docunent entry urder iten 3.

2.1.3 Applicable Oualification Ibeunents All vendor subnitted docunents recuired to establish the final equipnent qualification snah oe reviewea per ut. .2.-5.

'mese cocunents snau ce 11sted under Part A-3 of the

[bcunentation Arview Ibtn an3 include the revision level of each docunent (as applicable) . 'Ibese sinuld inclu3e environ-mental qualification plans and reIorts, seisnic plans and reports, sub/endor qualification reports and other docunen-

! tation as required to prove gjalification.

Ibcunents reviewa$ by 'INE that are requirai to establish qualification of equipuent shall be sa identified by aiding

" Qualification Package" to the distribution list on the transmittal letter an$ tinse not required in the qJalifi-cation package stuuld be identified by ad3ing "EQ File".

'Ibe docunent status will be indicated for each docunent listed " APP"(approved); "AEN"(appro/ed except as roted);

"FIO"(for information only); "N/A"(not a[pliceble) . 'Ihe

transmittal nunber and date for each docunent re/iewed will be j listed as applicable.

I i

'IUGCO NJCLEAR DOINEERItG P E EDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE PREPARATION OF EQUIP M QUALIFICATION 00CLMErfrATION TNE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 4 CF 22 2.1.4 Equinnent/ Function List equipment by type or nodel only (individual tag numuers are not necessary here but will be entered on page 9 of 9) as included in the specification and provide a brief description of its function. If equipnent is safety related, then state its safety function. Sufficient information saall be provided to identify the equipnent and correlate witn tne appropriate (bcunentation. For example, on specification MS-0208.1, listed equiptent might include "Feedwater Isolation Valve Pneumatic-Hydraulic Operators fedel P/N39991/Feedwater Isolation Valve Closure / thus the 1E equipment is nodel P/N 38991 valve operators and the safety function is operability of the feedwater isolation valves, includirg operability of renote p3sition indicaticn sensors.

2 1.5 Qualification Metha$

Identify the method or mathods used to establish qualifica-tion. Refer to section 5 of Ref.1.4(a) for acceptable

nethods of qualification.

2.1.6 Page Numberirn System te page numbaring system is designed to easily allow the a$dition of supplemental information without the need to renumber all pages. mis numberirg , system also provides tne necessary security to discover missirg pages. The system shall oe imolemented as follows; 1) the maximum number of pages is nine (9); 2) the pages are numbered as 1 of 9, 2 of 9, 5 of 9, etc; 3) any supplemental pages shall be designated by a letter after the page number sucn as, Sa of 9, 7a of 9, I

etc.; 4) the page PRECEDING tne supple 3 ental page, shall include a statement at the botton indicating the discussion or table is continued on the supple:nental page.

2.2 QUALIFICATICN CHECKLIST (Part B of Attachaent 1)

The Raviewer shall clearly indicate the correct response

( to each question, "Yes", *fb", or "N/A" (not applicaole).

t The wwuoiate cbcunent and page nunner(s) wnere the specific Information is located shall be cited under the "oage reference" space provided for each question. For l each question answered with eitner "No"'ex "NA" an explana-l tion / justification shall be provided in accordance with Section 2.3 of this procedure.

WIE: D3cunents may be referred to throughout the checklist by the item no. (3a, 36, 3c, etc.) under which the cbcument is listed in Part A.3 of tie review form (Attachment 1).

e

'IUGCO NUCLEAR ENGINEERING PRCCEDURE REVISIUb ISSUE PAE CPSES DATE mt.au<anuN u tuulmtm QJALIFICATION DOCINENTATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 5 & 22 te majority of the questions are self-explanatory, however the following discussion will help clarify the criteria to be met in order to answer "Yes" to checklist itens.

2.2.1 Specified Etp2ipment Each type or category of equipment to be anered by the docunentation shall ne explicitly addresse$ in the reports to assure an au$itable link per Section 6.3.1.1 of mference 1.4(a) ard to verify that all CPSG equipnent has been qualified as required.

2. 2. 2 CPSES Parameters i

Assure that the docunentation incorporates ard envelops the i CPSES paraneters. De normal ard accident environnental paraneters vary deperding on plant location. Each location where a specific piece of equipnent is used must be reiiews3.

If }nssible, the west location shall be (sea to establish qualification. Se agirg tenperature on which the qualified life is based, must be greater than the CEES normal paraneters. Se maxi: nun qualified accident envirerrnent must envelop, with ma: gin, the CPSES abnormal /a cident paraneters.

2.2.3 Auditable Link As required by mf.1.4(a) the docunentation must establish a traceable link between the actual equipnent qualified ard CPSES equipnent to assure @plicability of the gjalification.

2.2.4 Oualified Life l

We qualified life determine 3 by the gaalification progran must be explicitly stated and the agirg progran must Justify ~

and support the stated life.

! 2. 2. 5 . Qualification Methcd l

l We q2alification methods and testing equences (if type tested) stould conform to the requirenents of Ref.1.4(a) or any deviations should be justified. See Section 5 of mf.

1.4(a) for acceptable qualification methods. For equipnent

, that is type tested, the test sequence should conform to the recomnerdations of Sections 6.3.2 of Nf. 1. 4 ( a) . If the test sequence deviates from Bef.1.4(a) res.wwerdations, then then the methods used must be justifie$ as the most severe for the equipnent tested.

l l

l

1

'IUGCO NTIEAR DCINEERING PBOCEDURE REVISION ISS E PA2 '

CPSES [A'IE HQ.FAiWI1UN W EUJLHiENF CUALIFICATION [DCINENIATION 'INE-IC-15 6 2/11/86 6 & 22 2.2.6 Failure Criteria Specific failure criteria for cpalification tests must be defined. De inability of the test specimen to meet one or more of these criteria, constitutes a failure. If a failure occurs a detailed description, analysis ard justification must be govide$ to allow the docunentation (test reports, etc.) to be usal as evidence of hualification.

2.2.7 Qualification by Type 'Ibst Equipment exposed to the severe environmental extremes of a DBA (IDCA or HEIB) must be qualifie3 by type test to conclu-sively demonstrate operability.

2.2.8 Operability We cpalification program should denonstrate the equipnent's ability to perfcen its safety related function for its specified service envircrrnent arrl duration. See Section 2.2.2 for service environnent extrene paraneters.

e 2.2.9 Margin he valms of all Design Easis Btcnt (DBE) ewironmental parameters incorporates in the qualification prcgran must inclu3e margin. Section 6.3.1.5 of Ibf.1.4 (a) reccanerds levels of margin to be applied. If the reccmnerde$ levels of marg in in Ibf. 1.4(a) are rot met, a justification must be providai that allows the use of lesser values.

2.2.10 Installation md muntirn -

ne installation md roomtiry requirements should be specified in the docunentation to assure that the as-built configuration will ret canpromise the qualification. If the actual as-built installation differs fran that usal for the qualification tests, or assuned for an analysis, then adlitional docunentation shall be required to denonstrate that the deviation does rut invalidate the cpalification.

l 3 -.

TUGCO ti.CIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISIO6 ISSUE PA2 CPSES IME mrauwnUN W tVJimtM QALIFICATION 00CLMENTATION TNE-0C-15 6 2/11/86 7 CF 22 2.2.11 Maintenance iny maintenance or companent replacement intervals required to maintain the equipnent's qualifie3 status must be specifie3.

2.2.12 g

'the qualification must address the effects of age on the equip-ment's performance, ard proride assurance that the equipnent is capable of performing its required function in the erd-of-life cordition. See section 6.3.3 of Ref. 1.4(a) for acceptacle agirg metleds. If accelerated aging technigues were used as part of a type test progran, then th. e methocology must be Justified on the basis of the expected service wrditions.

Oaestions 12.a through 12.f refer to accelerated age conditioning and are self-explanatory.

2.2.13 Sutmergence If any equipnent is installed in locations that will be flooded, an3 is required to function while subnerged, then it must be qualified for this application. Cualification for subnergence stould alm incitde the equipuent's interfaces.

2.2.14 Maltiple Abnormal / Accident (bnditions If a piece of equipnent may be subjected to nore than one abrocnal/ accident scenario, a new set of corditions will be drawn that is a west case composite of all of this eguipnents i

abnormal / accident corditions. 'Ihis new set of corditions will serve as the required parameters to be satisfied. The gaalifi-cation docunentation must then envelop this new set of conditions men gaalification is establisned to the new set of corditions (canposite), it will alm be established for each contributirg abrecmal/ accident s enario.

2. 3 CHECKLIST RENARKS l

Explanation and justification for any "t0" or "N/A" resp 3nses

! to the checklist shall be proiided. 14rference the appropri-l ate docunent an3 pnge to support or further explain the

. remarks, if possible.

Any additional ccanents or clarifications necessary to sufficiently stamariae ard assess the a3equacy of the l qualification program shall be roted.

(

2.4 GALIFICATION CONTINGE!CIES (Part C of Attachnent 1) .l Any operatirg, maintenance, or canstruction requirenents, as l specifie$ in the qualification docunentation, that must be met to maintain the equipnent's g2alifia$ status, should be briefly sunnarized. Protide references to the appropriate qualification docunett'and page Were each requirement is located. All contirgercy itens must be addressed. Eb not

< 1 eave any items blank. If the qualification docunents did not address a particular con ency, s) state ard place "N/A" in the merespording " PAGE REF" l

'I1JGCO NUCIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE IEVI614 ISSUE PACE CPSES DA'IE HEPARATION & EQUIR4DR QUALIFICATION COCtMCEATION TNE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 8 0F 22 2.5 RENARKS (PART D OF ATTACINENT 1) l kviewer to provide any conments relevant to 02alification mich have not been cotered un3er checklist renarks.

2.6 REVIEWER IDENTIFICATION 2e Reviewer shall sign an3 date the gaalification review l form ( Attachnent 1).

'Ihe a:enpleted kview Ebrm shall be evaluated and signed by a 01ecker familiar with references in Section 1.4.

Sibsequent issues (revisions) of the Review Ebrm shall ce sequential and irtficated on page 1 of the Ibetmentation kview Ebrm (form TNE-DC-15.1) .

2.7 ENVIROtMEMAL QUALIFICATICN

SUMMARY

DATA (Part E of Attachnent 1) 4 The following instructions will a5 cress eacn major hea3irg and stfahea3irg of Part E.

1) Equipnent:

Type - a brief equipnent description such as, motor operator, solenoid valve, 600 volt power cable,

. etc.

Category - the aEplicable catagory(ies) this equipnent falls under as defined in paragraph 2, Appenaix E of NJREX3-0588. List the appro.-

priate letter designation (s).

2) Iocation:

Struct - the major structure or building that houses the equipnent; i.e., Safeguards Buildirg.

Area - a room or subsection of the above; i.e., Cable Spreading room.

3) Mfg:

his agplies to the equipnent manufacturer, not the vendor if they are different.

Type /tt> del - a unique equipnent designation assigned by the manufacturer; model number, etc.

'HJGCO NIIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEIXJRE REVISIOt; ISSUE PAGE CISES IRTE H(rnu<ATwN W UJU1mkNT QJALIFICATION IDCt. MENTATION INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 9 & 22

4) Abnocnal/ Accident Envitormental Extrenes:

This headirg a$ dresses the highest values, Wether abnormal or accident, for the followirg envirormental paraneters.

Temperature - maintain consistar.cy of mits *C or *F between the " Required" art 3 "Dem" (denon-strated) colunns.

Pressure - list the pressure in psia. If the pressure is atmospheric, use 14.7.

Rel. Hunid. - liste3 in %.

Radiation - list the mits as ra3s and indicate the coupsition of the dose; i .e . , g amna-R(g) ,

beta-R(b) , gantaa and beta R(g&b) .

Chenistry - if spre.y or other chenical applications are required, list the campsition, concentration (PPM), Ih , arti tenpera-ture.

POTE - The " Required" or "Ibg." colunns are the requirenents of the technical specifi-cations. The "Dem" colunns are the values listed in applicable qualification documentation.

5) Operability:

The period of time for *ich the equipment must renain operable in order to fulfill its safety-relata3 coliga-tion. 'Ihe operability requirements will vary for each l

piece of equipuent ard each accident. A typical entry might be " accidents plus one year post-accident".

l 6) Accuracy:

l l

The a curacy hea3ing is the equipnent accuracy; not the overall systen accuracy. The accuracy is listed as plus or minus a certain percent.

'IUGCO NUCIEAR DGINEERING PROCEIXJRE REVISIOb ISSUE IMGE CPSES IRTE EtPARATwN W SQUIR4ENI' QUALIFICATION EOCINENTATION 'INEd-15 6 2/11/86 10 & 22

7) OJalified Life:

List the gaalifie3 life for this equipnent as subjected to CPSES service corr 3itions. 'Ibe CPSES qualifie$ life may be different than the vendor (manufacturer) established qualifie3 life.

8) Qualification Method:

'Ihis healing a$ dresses the method by mich gjalification has been established. 'Ihe listings in this colum would usually be, Iype ':bst", " Analysis" or conbination of these.

9) Purchase Specification:

'Ibe designation of the applicable purchase specification stould be listed here. Sane exanples are ES-6, MS-605,

'INES-005.

2.8 SUPPLD4ENIARY EUJIINENT EA'IA (Part.F of Attachnent 1)

'Ibe followirg instructions will address each major heaiing ard sub-hea3ing of Part F.

1) Equipment N3nneiclature:

Equipnent Tag N3. - u5e migde identifier assigned to a specific piece of equipnent. Eganples are: 1-IES-5670, 2-HV-4575, 1-FIS-610.

Manufacturer - the nane of the troducer; this is not always the supplier.

Madel/ Type - the identifier used by the manufacturer to

designate a particular form or style of equipnent.

Examples may be, ASCO (manufacturer) NP831635E (model nunber) . Type in this case is 'neant to be ussi the same as model and is not to be confused with the equipnent type in Section E.

t i

I

'IUGCO NJCIEAR E2GINEERING PRT EDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DVIE N HUN W tU)1mtM OAIJFICATION 00CLME2TTATION WE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 11 OF 22

2) Equipnent Ircation:

Unit - the particular mit,1 or 2 in sich the equipnent is locata3.

asilding - the buildirg of the above mit, that houses the equipnent.

Ibom - the room, by nunber, *ere the equipnent is located.

(bordinates - these are the plant coordinates used cn the plan-view architectural drawings. Use decima' 3 to closely approximate the plan-view location.

Elevation - this is the ecuipment elevation; not jmt the floor elevation. Wat is, en iten at the 815' elevation would be five feet above the 810 ' floor.

3) Qualified Life Basis:

Wis headirg addresses the basis for establishing the

} qualifie3 life for this equipnent.

Plant temps. - tese are the normal service temperatures for the equipnent locations and usually vary throtgfout the year.

% of year - This is the anomt of time a particular temperature is prevelant for the equipnent locations. mis duration is listed in % of a par.

! Verd Aging Tenp.- his is the acceleratsi agirg tenperature used by the manufacturer, Vender or test laMratory to simulate the effect of agirg.

Ea - his is the activation eneroy med in the Arrhenius

~

equation that establishes the qualifie3 life.

l 2. 9 FIIE AND DISTRIBUTION t -

After coupletion and a final twiew, the master docunen-l tation review foun shall be retained in the qualification docunentation files by the 'INE Project Discipline Supervisor, Protection an3 Analysis.

A qualification docunentation package (a package shall

, consist of the original certification produced pe TNE-DC-16, j a copy of the docunentation review fonn produced for this l proce3ure ard other qualification docunentation as l applicable) shall be transnitted per Procedure 'INE-AD-4

for retention to the TUGJO Operations Record Center using l the transmittal form shown in Figure 1.

t

'IUCEO NJCIEAR DGINEERING IROCEDURE REVISIOS ISSUE PAT CPSES DATE tw.wdWT1UN W r.WirMcM OJALIFICATION DOCLMENIATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 12 OF 22 2.9.1 Packge Revision l

Revision to packages geviously transmitted to 'IUCCO Operations Recoco Center shall be docunentai ard trans-mitted per this gocedure for original package transmittal.

Se revision level of the Equipnent Qualification Cbcunen-tation Review Ibrm (Checklist) shall be kientified by vertical revision bars in the right hard margin adjacent to the a plicable docunent revisions or a$ditions since the prev (ios Review Ebrm.

Package revisions should be generated for, but rot be limited to, the followirg reasons:

a) addition of gaalification docunentation and revisions fran verdors, b) addition of cualification docunentation and re/isions by TUGCO, ard c) revisions to the Ebcunentation R= view Ebtm.

3.0 PROCEDURE - SEI94IC CATETTRY I & II ECUIR4ENr te Beviewer, to be assigned b visor Protection ard Analysis,y shall the Project Discipline be faniliar Super-witn and have available the latest e3ition of the Iurchase specifi-cation ard charges thereto for the equipnent urder review.

He shall als) have access to the applicable Gibbs & Hill Floor Response Spectra ard Specification 2323-SS-20 for the building in W.ich the egaipment is located.

3.1 REVIEW OF SEIS4IC DTLMENIS i

Review of seismic gjalification docunents shall be a:canp-1ished by canparirg the vendor supplied plans ard reports with CP3ES reguirements per atplicable specification with its

( attached Specifications 2323-SS-20 ard Floor Ibsponse

. Spectra.

3.1.1 Installation ard teunting i

See Section 2.2.10 of this goce$ure.

l i

i E

'IUIO NUCIEAR ENGINEERING PSOCEDJRE REVISIOb ISSIE PAGE CISES DATE mt.wwATwN (k tU)1MtNU QJALIFICATION DOCIMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 13 & 22 3.1.2 Disposition of Seimic Ibcunents Beview and statusing shall be in a:cordance with 'INE-DC-5.

3.2 FIII AND DISTRIBtfrION A qualification docunentation package (seimic cn1y) tall consist of a copy of docunentation necessary to prove qualif-ication and shall be transmitted to TUGCO Cherations Becords Center per TNE-AD-4 usirg the tranquittal form sicm in Figure 1. 'Ihe necessary docunentation shall be identified by beirg distributed to the Qualification Package as described in Section 2.1.3 of this procedure.

3.2.1 Packa:e Betision See Section 2.9.1 cf this procedure, a

f e

l

'ItXIO NUCIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISIOS ISSE PA2 CPSES [ ATE MC.1%km11UN U" tJJ.J 1 tM t.NF CUALIFICATION DOCtMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 14 CF 22 ATTACIMENT 1 Page 1 of 9 CCMANCIE PEAK STE7H EIMIC S'IATION IEEE 323-1974 EUJIIMENT QJALIFICATION DCIMENIATION REVIEW FOIN

Review Ibm Identification: Rev.

d. EOJIINENT/DTtMENTATICN IDENTIFICATICN

1. SPECIFICATION 20. 2. VENIDR

3. APPLICABIE QALIFICATICN DCCtMENTS:

TRA?EM1TIAL DOCLMENT STATW NtNBER/DATE (as applicable)

(a) _

(b)

(c)

(d) -

(e)

( f)

! (g)

( h) '

l 4. EQJIIMENT/FIRCTICN (per specification):

l S. QJALIFICATION MEIHOD(S) l l

l REVIEW FORM REVIEWER DA'IE REV. NO.

! REVIEW IGN REVIEWER DATE REV. NO. ,

CHECKER DATE l

FCEM: 'INE-DC-15.1

. January nue '

l l

l

'IUr0 NUCIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISIOb ISST PAGE CPSES DATE nu.insvgivN vt- tvJimtm Q:ALIFICATION DOCLMENTATION TNE-DC-15 .6 2/11/86 15 & 22 AT*TACMENT 1 (CONr)

Page 2 of 9 REVIEW FOIM NO. REV.

B. GALIFICATION GEC11IST DOC /PA2 REF YES to N/A 1. DOES IXIINENmTION ADDRESS AIL EQJIMENT SPfEIFIED?

YES to N/A 2. DOES [XItNENIATION ADDRESS CPSES SPECIFIC PARAMETERS?

YES to N/A 2a. DO NOINAL PARAMETERS FCR QALIFIED LIFE AND AGING ENVEIDP CPSES ?ORtAL PARAMETERS?

YES to N/A 2b. ID AB?ORMAI/ ACCIDENT IARAMEIERS USED IN GALIFICATION ENVEIDP CPSES ABtORMAI/PCCIDENT PARAMETERS?

+

YES PO N/A 3. IS DO~LMENIATION AUDITABIE AND TRACEABIE TO CPSES EEUIIMENr?

YES 20 N/A 4. IS GALIFIED LIFE EXPLICITLY STATED?

YES 10 N/A 4a. [D AGING RESULTS SUPIORT THE GALIFIED LIFE?

YES 10 N/A 5. [ DES QALIFICATION MED0D(S) CONFCRM WITH IEEE STD. 323-1974? '

YES to N/A Sa. IDES TEST SEQJEtCE CCFFORM TO IEEE STD. 323-19747 YES 10 N/A 6. ARE FAILIRE CRITERIA ETR TESTS EFINED?

YES to N/A 7. IF THE EQJIIMENT WOULD BE EX10 SED TO

[EA, WAS QJALIFICATION BY TYPE TEST?

YES to N/A 8. DOES DEMONSTRATED OPERABILITY ENVEIDP CISES REQJIREMENTS?

YES 70 N/A 8a. DOES tO3-DETRIMENmL FAILURE ENVEIDP CPSES REQJIREMENIS?

FCR4: TNE-DC-15. la January aco L

'ItKr0 MJCIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVIS1014 ISSLE 1R 2 CPSES DA'IE mt.kNwrivN w tuJimtm QUALIFICATION 00CLMENTATION 'INE-OC-15 6 2/11/86 16 OF 22 ATTACINENT 1 (CONT)

Page 3 of 9 REVIEW FOIN NO. REV.

B. QJALIFICATION CHECKLIST DOC /PAE REF YES 10 N/A. 9. ARE MARGIf6 DEFINED?

YES to WA 9a. CD MARGINS MEEP CR DCEED IEEE STD. 323-1974?

YES 10 N/A 10. ARE INS'IALIATION AND MCXNTING INTERFACES, AS REQUIRED FOR QJALIFICATION, SPECIFIED?

Y5 to N/A 11. ARE MAINTEtRNCE REQUIREMENIS AND C[MIONENT REPLACEMENT INTERVAIS SPECIFIED?

4 12. AGING MEmlO[DIDGY YES to N/A 12a. WAS ARRHENICE MEmlODOIDGY LEED IN AGING PER NUREG 0588?

YES to N/A 12b. ARE THEINAL AGING PARAMETERS JUSTIFIED?

YES 20 N/A 12c. WAS THE TEMPERATURE LEED FOR ACCELERA'IED 'IHE3 MAL AGING VERIFIED 'IO BE IESS 'IHAN TEMPERATURES AT WHICH IOKWN MA'IERIAL IHASE CERNGES CCCLR PER NUREG 0588?

i YES 20 N/A 12d. WAS MECIANICAL AGING JUSTIFIED (CY-CLIC DUTY REQUIREMEN5 SPECIFIED)? -

YES 20 N/A 12e. i. DOES RADIATION AGING ENVEIDP CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

i YES to N/A 13e. ii. WAS COBALT 60 USED FCR THE RADIATION SOCRCE?

YES 70 N/A 12f. IRVE KNCMN SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS BEEN (DNSIDERED PER M. REG 0588?

IGM: 'DE-DC-15. I b

.;anuary m o

1

'lUIO MJCIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISIOb ISSIE mCe CPSES IA'IE rat.mmuun a tw Ame.w QJALIFICATION 00CINENIATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 17 OF 22 ATTACmENT 1 (CONT)

Page 4 of 9 REVIEW FOm NO. REV.

B. 03ALIFICATION CHECKLIST (CCNr'D)

YES 20 N/A 12f IAVE INOWN SWERGISTIC EFFEC'IS BEEN CDtEIDERED PER NUREG 05887 4

13 SUBMERGE?CE YES PO N/A 13a IS 'IHIS EUJIEMENT StBJEC'IED 'IO StBMER2?CE?

YES NO N/A 13b IS 'IMIS EQUIINENT REQUIRED TO OPERA'IE IF SUEMERGED?

YES FO N/A 13e IS 'DiIS EUJIIMENT QJALIFIED ECR StBMERGEtCE?

FOIM: TNE-IE-15.lb muary 4wn L

\

i

. l l

l l

t

'IUGCO NLCIEAR DGINEERING PROCEIXRE REVISIOb ISSUE PAGE CPSES IA*IE mt.mewrivN w twimt.Nr GRLIFICATION IDCLNENTATION 'INE-OC-15 6 2/11/86 18 T 22 ATI%CINENT 1 (CONT)

Page 5 of 9 REVIEW FOIM NO. REV.

CHECKLIST REMARIG 1

Form: 'INE-OC-15. Ic January Aw b L '

i l

. l TUGCO f(JCIEAR DGINEERING P%CEDURE REVISIOb ISSLE PAT CPSES DATE no:,MUWUUN M t W i m t2 1 QJALIFICATION IDCtNENmTION INE-OC-IS 6 19 7 22 2/11/86 ATI7CINENT 1 (CONI)

Page 6 of 9 REVIEW FOIM NO. REV.

C. OJALIFICATION GNTINGDCIES DOC /PAGE' REF.

1. MAINIENMCE INTER %1S

2. REPLACEMENT INTER %LS

3. STOl%GE REQUIREMENIS i

4. INS 1ALIATION REUJIREMENIS

5. MOUNrING REQUIREMENIS r

l r

l FCRM: TE-DC-15.1d

. January 1966 I

MO WCIEAR ENGINEERING PRCEEDURE REVISIOb ISSLE MCE CP3E5 mg Mit.k'fu% HUN Ut tGU1mwr CUALIFICATION [DCLMD7fATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/1'1/86 20 & 22 ATTACINENT 1 (CONT)

Page 7 of 9 REVIBi FOIM NO. REV.

D. REMARIG l

l I

l l

l l

j Eban: 'INE-OC-15.le January 190b I

'IUCCO NUCLEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISIOb ISSUE PAGE CPSES IATE mm.Amw11w u- tw1mtur QJALIFICATION DOCLMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 21 CF 22 I I

NiTACIMENT 1 (CONT)

U B Fom 10. E.

E. BWIENOTAL SKIFICATidN SMt4RT DATA Pa9e8Of9 Eal!PIOT LOCAT!W IFE . AIN0eKIE OhTRON. OmDES 00ABit!TY ACQAACT SK EK fifDid TTK/ CATH ORT ST E f/A D TY1900El PAAKTER EQUID B E0 B E0 D LIE ETH00 SPEC.

Temperature:

Pressure:

Rel. Raid.:

Radiaticrt:

OrnistrT:

I l

l l FON: 'INE-DC-15.1 f January Ddb L _ _ _ _ _ __

.. o

'ILKIO NLEIEAR ENGINEERING P!40CEDURE REVISION ISSUE IAE CPSES IATE kte,ankkYl~1VN J tJJJikfitN1' QJALIFICATION IDCLMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 6 2/11/86 22 & 22 ATTACEMENT 1 (CONr)

EYD FolM m. U- ' '

gapigg upocjm EWIPOT LOCATION MM M WIS EMP.TE m. E. MOEl TYPE IMIT Ils u si alog N TES ELD. N WS. ! 7 & 9. EM M. G.

f FCHi: 'INE-t:C-15.19 January 19u6 w m - - - " - + - - - - , - , . - - _ _ - -

7 1

~M

~

fhJ

/ Gibbs 8 Hill. inc. -

a t r E tyED E NGINE E R $ DC 5 TONE R$ CCNsfeuCTORS gg 27 2y pu m ,

ceRECT DIAL E AT E N $10N

' 2 ""

..._.- imi teo44 50 N-36070 April 20, 1979 RECEITTED Texas Utilities Generating Company Post Office Box 1002 SEP 18 385 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 TNE Attention: Mr. J.T. Merritt cuciucc=inc sunnonT caou, Manager of Construction and Engineering Gentlemen:

TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1981 2300 MW INSTALLATION Gr.H PROJECT NO. 2323 VENDOR LETTER NO. DTF-76, DATE 3-16-79, P.O. NO. CP-0460 ELECTRICAL PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES By copy of this letter, we enclose to the vendor stamped

" Approved Except as Noted for Arrangement Only - Proceed with Fabrication, Subject to Compliance with all Contract Requirements, Drawings and Specifications," the following drawings:

f Amphenol Sams 50021690 Rev. K Penetration Assembly Sheet 2 50022003 Rev. F Loose Equip. List 4 Low Volt Power i 50028232 Rev. C Pre Crimp Module Pigtail Assy.

Sheet 2 l The vendor is requested to revise the above drawings as indicated l thereon and resubmit one reproducible and four prints of each by i May 18, 1979, for our review and final approval.

i l

l By copy of this letter, we also enclose to the vendor stamped

, " Approved for Arrangemertt;__OJ1l_y - Proceed with Fabrication, Subject A to Compliance with all Contract Requirements, Drawings and Specifications," the following drawings:

N I Amphenol Sams N '

PL50020445 Rev. H Elect. Pen. Assy. Low Voltage Sheet 1 x ,-

/ Power l PL50020445 Rev.;H Part List - Low Voltage Eower Sheet 2 /

N

/

i

... se c To ...~ue ... ,o... ~.v.ioco. C. . t e : ... . s m.a. ~ - v oa -

l ,

9

T f

2-Texas Utilities Generating Company April'20, 1979 GTN-36070 .

. Amphenol Sams (Cont'd.)

50020445 Rev. H Penet. Assy. Low Voltage Power 50021690 Rev. K , Elect. Penet. Assy. 5 inch IPS Shee t- 1 3

/ -50028232 -. Rev. C Pre Crimp Module Pigtail Assembly f t

/ Sheet 1 )

The ' vendor 1s requested to refer to the above "GTN" number in any transmittals resulting from this letter.

Very truly yours, GIBBS & HILL, Inc.

HRR-RHW:kh [H.R. Rock One Copy ' Project Manager cc: ARMS (B&R) site original (w/2 apert. cards of each)

Mr. D.N. Chapman (TUGCO QA Dallas) (1)

Mr. J.C. Kuykendall (TUGCO) field office (1) (w/l apert. card of each)

."'Nr. 'R.T~. Hollowa5) ( G&H Dallas ) (1) (w/l apert. card of each)

'lir.~~ George Champ (Amphenol) (2) (w/l print & 1 repro. of each)

O e

(

l 6 4

~

$~

i s

'i '

, i

' GW b?0 .

o 1

The above CTN letter and.arta h

. at have been designated as a permanent .

plant record and is presently filed in the Permanent Plant Records Vault by Purchase Order i CP- O d D.

6 0

)

O 9

e e

• g.

e 0

6 5

4 O

2;

'- ~

, 7 COMANGE PEAK SIEAM EECTRIC STATION EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATICN GRTIFICATION SHEER I.

'nie @alification for the equipment covered by Bquipnent Qualification Documentation Review Ebm 2323. Es- l z , Red. 3 is found to be acceptable for WMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION in thE application as noted in the review fom and per the justification in Section II.

. II. The qualification infomation was evaluated per the CPSES Bauipment Qualification Oertification Procedure. The qualification of this equipment is justified by the qualification hets listed on the attached review fom, the diedclist aid consments comments:

provided on the attached review fom ard the following 4

h 0 wrf kH5 9&-2V-8$~

Form: 'INE-DC-16.1 January 1984

Page 1 of 7 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION IEEE 323-1974 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW FORM A- , EQUIPMENT / DOCUMENTATION IDENTIFICATION

1. SPECIFICATION NO. 2323-ES-12 2. VENDOR Bunker-Ramo Coro

3. APPLICABLE QUAllFICATION DOCUMENTS:

DOCUMENT STATUS TRANSMITTAL (AEN, APP) (NUMBER & DATE) a) Desian Qual Rot 123-2233. R/7 APP GTN-60118, 7/2/82 b) Heatina Analysis. 123-2232. R/7 APP GTN-60118, 7/2/82 Design Qual Test Procedure c) 123-2159. R/5a APP GTN-60076, 7/1/82 d) Seismic Rot, 123-2159-16, R/5 APP GTN-59972, 6/25/82 Seismic Qual of Junction e) Boxes 123-2291 R/O APP GTN-59769, 6/16/82 f) Stress Report 123-2162. R/C APP GTN-60393, 7/21/82 Qual Rept supplement for Raychem Nuclear Grade Adhesive

-S1119-EDR-5021 and Raychem g) Coro. Telex dated 4/26/85 FIO N/A CPPA-22826 - Telephone conv. red h) between Bill Ross and Mano Aaron FlO N/A 4 EQUIPMENT / FUNCTION (per specification)

Electric Panetration Assemblies provide a means for the continuity of

. power, control and signal circuits through the CPSES containment structure pressure barrier'(or valve isolation tanks), while maintaining the integrity of the barrier

5. QUALIFICATION METHOD (S) Combination of tvoe test and analysis REVIEWER N. K Kundu DATE 7/23/82 REVIEWER N. K. Kundu DATE 8/26/82 R/1 REVIEWER N. K. Kundu DATE 11/22/82 R/2 REVIEWER L. W. Hart N DATE IS R/3 Form: TNE-DC 15 1 January 1984

Spo . 2323-ES-12 Pago 2 of 7 B. QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST DOC /PAGE REF Y E S: NO N/A 1 DOES DOCUMENTATION ADDRESS ALL 1E 3a/35 thru 40a

/ EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED?

YES NO N/A 2. DOES DOCUMENTATION ADDRESS CPSES 3a/57 (See remark 2)

SPECIFIC PARAMETERS?

CYES) N/A NO 2a .DO NORMAL PARAMETERS FOR QUALIFIED LIFE AND AGING ENVELOP CPSES NORMAL 3a/4 and 4a, (See Remark 2a)

PARAMETERS?

NO N/A 2b DO ABNORMAL / ACCIDENT PARAMETERS USED 3a/57 and 58 OES IN QUALIFICATION ENVELOP CPSES ABNORMAL / ACCIDENT PARAMETERS?

f NO N/A 3 IS DOCUMENTATION AUDITABLE AND 3a,3b and 3e/ front TRACEABLE TO CPSES EQUIPMENT? cover pages (See remarks 3)

ES NO N/A 4 IS QUALIFIED LIFE EXPLICITLY STATED? 3a/27 ES NO N/A 4a DO AGING RESULTS SUPPORT THE 3a/4,4a and 4b OUALIFIED LIFE?

NO N/A 5. DOES QUALIFICATION METHOD (S) CONFORM 3c/1 OYES WITH IEEE STD. 323-1974?

NO N/A Sa DOES TEST SEQUENCE CONFORM TO 3c/61 (See Remark Sa)

$ OYES IEEE STD. 323-19747 f NO N/A 6. ARE FAILURE CRITERIA FOR TESTS 3c/throughout DEFINED? test procedure.

NO N/A 7,. IF THE EQUIPMENT WOULD BE EXPOSED 3a/20 thru 26 OES TO DBA, WAS QUALIFICATION BY TYPE TEST?

N/A OESNO 8. DOES DEMONSTRATED OPERABILITY ENVELOP CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

3a/33a Form: TNE-DC 15.fa January 1984 L

Spec. 2323-ES-12 Page 3 of 7 B. QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (Cont'd) DOC /PAGE REF NO N/A Ba DOES NON-DETRIMENTAL FAILURE See Remark 8a OYE ENVELOPE CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

YES( ) N/A 9. ARE MARGINS DEFINED? See Remark 9 & 9a NO N/A 9a DO MARGINS MEET OR EXCEED lEEE See Remark 9 & 9a OfES STD. 323-1974?

f NO N/A 10. ARE INSTALLATION AND MOUNTING INTER- 3c/6,7, & 8 FACES, AS REQUIRED FOR QUALIFICATION (See Remark 10)

SPECIFIED?

YES NO N/ 11 ARE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AND See Remark 11 COMPONENT REPLACEMENT INTERVALS SPECIFIED?

12. AGING METHODOLOGY NO N/A 12a WAS ARRHENIUS METHODOLOGY USED IN 3a/4 (See Remark 12a)

OYES AGING PER NUREG 05887

) NO N/A 12b ARE THERMAL AGING PARAMETERS JUSTlFIED? 3a/4a YES( ) N/A 12e WAS THE TEMPERATURE USED FOR ACCELERATED See Remark 12c THERMAL AGING VERIFIED TO BE LESS THAN TEMPERATURES AT WHICH KNOWN MATERIAL PHASE CHANGES OCCUR PER NUREG-0588?

) YES NO 12d WAS MECHANICAL AGING JUSTIFIED See Remark 12d (CYCLE DUTY REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED)?

NO N/A 12e i.DOES RADIATION AGING ENVELOPE 3a/10 OYES CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

i i  ! ..

ES NO N/A 12e li.WAS COBALT 60 USED FOR THE 3a/10 RADIATION SOURCE?

YES N/A 12f HAVE KNOWN SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS BEEN See Remark 12f CONSIDERED PER NUREG 0588?

Form: TNE-DC 15.1b January 1984 i

e

Pago 4 of 7 CHECKLIST AEMARK.S

2) The qualification documentation does not address specific CPSES's normal service parameters. However, B-R states on 3a/29 that the EPA's will meet the requirements of CPSES's specific normal service parameters as given in the equipment specification.

CPSES's specific abnormal / accident environmental parameters are addressed on 3a/57.

2a) The thermal aging parameters used in the type testing are based upon thermal degradation of the module and module seal materials. The thermal aging parameter used was 121 C for 9 days. This accelerated aging is equivalent to 85.92 C for 40 years on the basis of Arrhenius methodology (see 3a/4a). The actual operating temperature of these materials is less than 82 C for the specific CPSES average EPA ambient temperature of 45 C (50 C for inside containment and 40 C for outside containment, see 3b/33) Hence, it can be concluded that the normal parameters for qualified life and aging envelop specific CPSES normal parameters, with margin.

3) Documents 3c and 3d are generic in nature and alone are not auditable or traceable to specific CPSES equipment. However, these two documents are referenced in document 3a, which is auditable and traceable to specific CPSES equipment.

Sa) The partial discharge (corona) test as required by lEEE Std. 317-1976, and the BIL test as required by Regulatory Guide 1.63, revision 2 were performed on separate specimens (other than those which were tested per test sequence shown on 3c/61) to demonstrate design compliance.

p Ba) Test failures are indicated on 3a/5 through 8,'10,16,22 and 23. The vendor has analyzed these failures and has taken appropriate corrective design actions to eliminate the causes of these failures in the productions units furnished to CPSES.

9&9a.. Margins:are not specifically defined. :However, by. comparing the CPSES specific accident environmental parameters to the actual parameters used in the generic type testing, we find that margins meet or exceed IEEE Standard 323-1974 recommended values. per NUREG-0588, no margin in radiation dose is required since the postulated dose has been calculated per NUREG-0588 requirements. These margins are qualified on page 5 and indicated on page 8 of this checklist.

Form: TNE-DC 15.1c January 1984

. s page 4a of 7 ABNOAMAL/AC ENVAlON. EXTAEMES AEF.

pAAAMETER AEOUIRED DEM MAAGIN DOCUMENT Temp: 268F 340F +72F 3a/57 pressure: 48,1 psig 105 psig +118% 3a/57 Aelative Humidity: 100% Saturated N/A 3a/57 Steam Chemistry: Spray: Spray: N/A 31/57 2300 ppm 3000 ppm boric boric acid acid bufered bufered with NaOH NaOH to a ph of to a ph 8.6 to 10. of 11.

Radiation: 1.92x10 2.0x10 +4%(1) 3a/10 rad rad (1) See remark 9 & 9a

10) Per 3c/8, the installation and mounting used during the type test simulated the plant installed configuration. The field installation and mounting procedures are given in the Bunker-Ramo (B-R) Instruction Manual Numbers 123-2101; 123-2098; 123-2216; 123-2245 and 123-2246.

11) No specific maintenance requirements and component replacement g intervals are indicated since the EPA's have a qualified life of 40 years.

12a) Arrhenius methodology was used to determine the thermal aging parameters for module material and module seal The 10 C half-life empirical rule was used in thermal aging'of temperature stable O-ri,ng and terminal block material. The aging life'of cable insulation was determined by the individual cable manufacturers and is qualified in accordance with IEEE std. 383-1974 See 3a/4, 4a, 4b and 3a/15 through 18 for details.

12c) No known material phase changes have been identified by the vendor or the reviewer.

l 12d) Mechanical cyclic duty is not applicable to Electric Penetration Assemblies (EPA) since it is comprised of all stationary components.'

12f) No known synergistic effects have been identified by the vendor or the reviewer I

\ ,

l

j g

Page 5 of 7 C. QUALIFICATION CONTINGENCIES DOC /PAGE AEF

1. MAINTENANCE INTERVALS No special maintenance intervals are indicated in the qualification documentation.

2. REPLACEMENT INTERVALS No specific component replacement intervals are indicated in the qualification documentation, since the EPA's are qualified for 40 years.

3. STORAGE REQUIREMENTS No special storage requirements are indicated in the qualification documentation General storage requirements are shown in Bunker-Ramo Pr'ocedure No. 123-2215.

4. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS See Checklist remark, item No. 10.

5. MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS I i l ,

j ,

Wald all around the weld neck Per equipment flange to nozzle. . specification and 3c/6,7 Form: TNE-OC 15.1d January 1984

_. . - . . . - - ~ -. -.

+ ., ,

pago 6 of 7 D. r REMARKS

, The type testing was performed in accordance w=ith IEEE Std.

i 317-1976, the daughter document to IEEE Std. 323-1974 This test was generic in nature and in many instances imposed more severe environmental parameters and more stringent acceptance criteria than those required for CpSES. Consequently, there were some failures during the test, for which the manufacturer had to improve the original design of certain components and discard certain configurations from the qualification program and their use in the plant. The production units furnished to CpSES 4

conform to the qualified configurations.

i Bunko Ramo Electric penetration Assemblies tested and qualified, utilized a Raychen Ribbon Adhesive S1024 Due to the unavailability of one of its raw materials, adhesive S1024 is no longer available. As a substitute, Raychem Energy Division has tested and compared a new adhesive S1119 to the previously qualified adhesive S1024 Raychem Report EDR-5021( Reference

' document 3g) presents the results of an evaluation of the relative performance of material properties of each adhesive that relates to this function as a sealant for electrical applications,4, i Results indicate the S1119 adhesive performs as we l I as or better

, than S1024 Report EDR-4021 was accepted and approved under specification ES-100 for outside of containment use of the S1119

, adhesive at CpSES. However, since the S1024 adhesive was qualified for use inside of containment, and Raychem has demostrated than S1119 has better material properties, adhesive

}. S1119 is qualified for use with Bunko Ramo Electric penetration Assemblies. Also, per telephone conversation Record between Bill Ross of TUSI and Mamo Aaron of ANCO Engineers, RT-876 tubing is acceptable as a substitute for RFA tubing sealing of Trian Connectors.

B o

i REVIEWER N. K. Kundu DATE'7/23/82 REVIEWER 1. W. Hart bb DATE Sh t / fr-i Rii i

• i f

l

u E. ENVIRONNENTAL 05AtlFICATIO4 SINNAlf DATA '

Page 7 el 7 '

EGIIPNENT 10CAfl85 NFS AluGANAllAC ENVilON. EITBENES CPERAllllTT ACC90ACT OIAL OtAL pletinst TT9ffCATE8007 titlCilitFA TiptfR00ft PROANETER RE00llEB '

BEN PEO BEN BE0 BEN tlFE NETMOD REF SpfC.

Electric Beaster Inster Temperature: 268F (4) 340F Notes 4.5 grs N/A Hl4 44 Type 112 2113-ES-11 Pesetraties Isildiagi Isas Cor.l Pressere: -48.1 psig 185 psig iI3 Inte years Test Asseellies! Centaissent Beader Islative Note 2) and Category a vall and Plate type Neeliity: lit i Salstated Analysis valse desige Steam isolaties tants. Chemistry: Sprar: Spray:

2380 ppe 2000 ppe '

terie berle acid acid intered befored with with

'll:0E Nach (e a ph le a ph of I.6 le 11.

10.

Radiaties: 1'. g 2 :10, 2.8:10, BAO IAB fjell ig) ~

1. [PA's used la CPSES Class IE circuits are required te salatale leth Isectissal operanility and settanical lategrity for the duraties of the aseident. EPA's used la Neo-Class IE tiresits are required to esistala only segnaalcal integrity for the duratica of the assideal.

2. All EPA's desesstrated hath fanatissal operanility and sechasical integrity for the eqsivaleet el 4.5 years accident estiressent, estept the medise voltage EPA's used is Nea-Class it tiresits. Nediso voltage EPA's desenstrated faseties I speranility for fast nears and seenasical lategrity for the etsivalest of 4.5 years accident enviressent.

3. Accident doraties is assened to be 1-year. *

4. The calistated vapor temperatere rassiting free postulated steam line treats inside Ine conlaissent hellding esteed til F for a snart time and reatnes a peat value of 334 F.

Fere: TNE-DC 15.le J. asses leta

'f

.c

/M i

Gibbsl8 Hill. Inc.

July 26, 1982 I

GTN-60467

~QU!P. QUAL l

Texas Utilities Generating Company JUL 29 '82 Post Office Box 1002 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 T$G Attention: Mr. J. T. Merritt Manager of Construction & Engineering Gentlemen:

TEXAS UTILITIES GENERTING COMPANY COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION G&H PROJECT NO. 2323 CLASS 1E EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT REVIEW

, Enclosed herewith is/are the subject qualification document review forms to document our review, in accordance with the IEEE 323-1974 Equipment Qualification Documentation Review Instruction for the following equipment / specifications:

_ Specification No. Equipment 4

Rev. No.

ES-12 Electric Penetration --

Assemblies Ns ts pem m us caos s. am A. i o<.cs o .

• w w. N.. m iocoi 2127so4438 v.s.=: 22447sersa744 eao.a. ors = 0.. oa.rs c w. cesssu.w. e coa icuctors 3

. . . . . . *1

, G,TN 60467 July 26, 1982 Texas Utilities Generating Company Please the HELB, note that the environmental parameters resulting from presently being determined by damage study analysis have specifications.addressed at this time for the above equipment /

not been If you have any questions, please contact this office.

i Very truly yours, GIBBS & HILL, Inc.

/ Rober

$$ b t

. saAlard, Jr.

2c,o. Gng Pro]ect hanager REBa 6 -TRV:lc 1 Letter CC: ARMS (B&R Site) OL + 1A L. M. Popplewell (TUSI Site) IL

,., ~ R. D. Calder (TUSI Site) lL + lA 4

l i

r isiiCEiVtiU Jijl. 2 .

Tee.c =: k ?!ct

Page 1 of 8 COMANCHE PEAK STEA!! ELECTRIC STATION IEEE 323-1974 CLASS IE EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW FORM A.

EQUIPMENT / DOCUMENTATION IDENTIFICATION

1. SPECIFICATION NO.

2323-ES-12 2. VENDOR

3. EUNKER-RAMO CORP.

APPLICABLE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS:

DOCUMENT STATUS (AEN, APP) TRANSMITTAL (GTN & DATE)

(a) Design Qualification Report /123-2233,Rev.7 APP.

GM-60118, 7/2/82 (b) Heating Analysis, 123-2232,Rev. 7 APP. GTN-60118, 7/2/82 (c) Design Qualification Test Procedure 123-2159, Rev. Sa APP.

GTN-60076, 7/1/82 (d) _ Seismic Report, 123-2159-16, Rev. 5 APP. GTN-59972, 6/25/82 (e) _Seismic Qualification Boxes, 123-2291, Rev. Oof Junction APP.

_ GTN-59769. 6/16/82 (f) Stress Report, 123-2161, Rev. C APP.

GTN- 60393, 7/21/82 (g) _

4 (h) --

4.

CLASS IE EQUIPMENT / FUNCTION(per specification):

Electric Penetration Assemblies provide a means for the conti nuity of power, control and signal circuits through the CPSES containment structure pressure barrier (or valve isolation tanks), while maintaining the inte grity of the barrier.

5.

QUALIFICATION METHOD (S) Combination of type test and analysis.

REVIEWER N.K. KUNDU N " W DATE 13 h1

SPEC. 2323-ES-12A B. QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST DOC /PASE REF NO N/A 1. DOES DOCUMENTATION ADDRESS ALL IE 3a/35 'thru 40a, EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED?

YES @ N/A 2. DOES DOCUMENTATION ADDRESS CPSES SPECIFIC PARAMETERS? 3a/57 (See Remark 2).

h NO N/A 2a DO NORMAL PARAMETERS FOR QUALIFIED 3a/4 and 4a.

LIFE AND AGING ENVELOPE CPSES NORMAL PARAMETEPS?

h NO N/A 2b. DO ABNORMAL /ACCIDEhT PARAMETERS USED 3a/57 and 58.

IN QUALIFICATION ENVELOPE CPSES ABNORMAL / ACCIDENT PARAMETERS?

h NO N/A 3. IS DOCUMENTATION AUDITABLE AND 3a, 3b and 3e/ front TRACEABLE 1V CPSES EQUIPMENT? cover pages (See Remark h NO N/A 4.

IS QUALIFIED LIFE EXPLICITLY STATED? 3a/27 h !!O N/A 4a. DO AGING RESULTS SUPPORT THE 3a/4,4a and 4b.

QUALIFIED LIFE 7 h NO N/A S. DOES QUALIFICATION METHOD (S) CONFORM 3c/1.

NITH IEEE STD. 323-19747 h NO N/A Sa. DOES TEST SEQUENCE CONFORM TO 3c/bl (See Remark Sa).

IEEE STD. 323-19747 h NO N/A 6. ARE FAILURE CRITERIA FOR TESTS 3c/throughout DEFINED?

test procedure, NO N/A 7. IF THE EQUIPMIh7 WCULD BE EXPOSED 10 DBA, WAS QUALIFICATION BY TYPE 3a/20 thru 26 i

TEST?

h NO N/A 8. DOES DEMONSTRATED OPERABILITY 3a/33a.

ENVELOPE CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

h NO N/A Ba. DOES NON-DETRIMENTAL FAILURE See Remark Ba.

ENVELOPE CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

h NO N/A 9. ARE MARGINS DEFINED?

h NO N/A 9a. DO MARGINS MEET OR EXCEED IEEE 3c/14 and 3b/1 See Remark 9a.

STD. 323-1974?

h NO N/A

10. ARE INSTALLATION AND MOUNTING INTER- 3c/6,7 & 8 FACES, AS REQUIRED FOR QUALIFICATION, (See Reman 10).

SPECIFIED?

YES NO h 11. ARE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AND COMPONENT REPLACEMENT INTERVALS See Remark 11.

SPECIFIED?

I O 9

,

• we

• 9

'B.

QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (Cont'd) DOC /PAGE REF

12. AGING METHODOLOGY h NO N/A 12a. WAS ARRHENIUS METHODOLOGY USED IN 3a/4 (See Remark 12a AGING PER NUREG 0588?

h NO N/A 12b. ARE THERMAL AGING PARAMETERS JUSTIFIED? 3a/4a.

h NO N/A 12c.

WAS THE TEMPERATURE USED FOR ACCELERATED See Remark 12c.

THERMAL AGING VERIFIED TO BE LESS THAN TEMPERATURES AT WHICH KNOWN MATERIAL YES PHASE CHANGES OCCUR PER NUREG 0588?

NO h 12d. WAS MECHANICAL AGING JUSTIFIED See Remark 12d, (CYCLIC DUTY REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED)?

h NO N/A 12e. i.

DOES RADIATION AGING ENVELOPE 3a/10-CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

h NO N/A 12e.

ii. WAS COBALT 60 USED FOR THE RADIATION 3a/lo.

SOURCE?

YES h N/A 12f. HAVE XNOWN SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS BEEN See Remark 12f.

CONSIDERED PER NUREG 0588?

+3 4

+

CHECKLIST REMARKS

2) .

The qualification service parameters.doctamentation However, does not address specific CPSES' s normal requirements equipnent of CPSES's specification. specific normal service parameters n the as CPSES's 3a/57. specific abnormal / accident environmentatl parameters a re addressed on 3)

Documents 3c and 3d are generic in nature and alone are able to specific CPSES equipment. o nt auditable or trace-in document 3a, which is auditable and traceable to specific CPSHowev ES equipment.

Sa) ne partial dischage (corona) test as required by IEEE Std.

BIL test as required by Regulatory Guide 1.63, revision 2 w 317-1976, and the ere performed on on 3c/61) to demonstrate design compliance.-separate ence specimens shown Ba)

Test failures are indicated on 3a/5 through 8 has analyzed these failures and has taken appropriat, 10, 16, We22 and 23.

vendor to eliminate the causes of these failurese production CPSES. e corrective design actions in th units furnished to

93) IEEE Std. 317-1976, the daughter document to IEEE Std . 323-1974, indicates plied with these requirements (See 3a/9, .

The vendor10, 12 and 5 has com'-

Margins for Rated Short Circuit Current and Duration, and Rated Maximum Du .

current are established as described belowa ration of Rated Short Circuit 1.

Short Circuit Current and Duration Test -~

have been established by analysis.The shortconductors of penetration circuit current a  !

correlation of test data. These ratings are confirmed by that 50 margin on currents are'used in the an lThe qualification. report!does rises (AT, see 3a/15)However, the actual test data indicate substantia Also, these rated values are higher than CPSES'sthan (see 3a/48). in the analysis. that as exists in the rated values when compared with rgin CPSESThere

2. specific requirements.

Rated Maximum Duration of Rated Short-Circuit urrent Test - C These ratings of penetration conductors have bee and further confirmed by correlation with n established by analysis test data. The qualification t

analysis which establish the ratings. report es are does used in not the indicate j

maximum temperature IDCA temperature (see 3a/24), whereas CPSES's mHowever, th is 280*F.

environment will be much higher than athose shown on 3 /25H on 3a/25 envelopes CPSES requirements. .

The values shown Y

y ) q f f, ~"

e, .

Page 5 of 8 Checklist Remarks (Cont'd)

Therefore, considerable margin exists in the modified ratings (analysis based upon CPSES IDCA environment) when compared toe uCPSES ments. re- spe 10) the plant installed configuration.Per 3c/8, the installation and ae mounting procedures are given in the Bunker-Ramo (B-R)The field installation and mounting 123-2101; 123-2098; 123-2216; 123-2245; and 123-2246. Instruction Manual Numbers 11)

No ' specific maintenance requirements and component replacement a s ir terval are indicated since the EPA's have a qualified life of 40 years.

12a)

Arrhenius methodology was used to determine the thermal aging paramete module seterial and module seals. rs for in thermal aging of temperature stable 0-ring and terminal block s.

mate The aging life of cable insulation was determined by the individual cabl e manufacturers and is qualified in accordance with IEEE Std. 383-1974 3a/4, 4a, 4b and 3c/15 through 18 for details. . See 12c)

No usedknown material phase for accelerated thermalchanges aging. have been identified at the 121*C temp erature 12d) .

j Mechanical (EPA) cyclic duty is not applicable to Electric Penetration Assemblies since it is comprised of all stationary components.

12f)

No known synergistic effects have been identified by the vendor and the reviewer.

h

. , .* 4

. P 92 6 Of 8 C. QUALIFICATION CONTINGENCIES DOC /PAGE REF

1. ' MAINTENANCE INTERVALS No special maintenance intervals are indicated in the qualification docu-mentation.

2. REPLACEMENT INTERVALS No specific component replacement in-tervals are indicated in the qualification documentation, since the EPA's are qualified for 40 years.

3. STORAGE REQUIREMENTS No special storage requirements are in-dicated in the qualification documentation.

General storage requirements are shown in Bunker-Ramo Procedure No. 123-2215.

t i

4. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS See checklist remark, Item No. 10,

5. MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS Weld all around the weld neck Per equipment flange to nozzle, specification and 3c/6,7, U

D. REMARKS The type testing was performed in accordance with IEEE Std. 317-1976, the daughter document to IEEE Std. 323-1974. This test was generic in nature and in many instances imposed more severe environmental parameters and more stringent acceptance criteria than those required for CPSES.

Consequently, there were some failures during the test, for which the manufacturer had to improve the original design of certain components and o.scard certain configurations from the qualification Program and theit use in the plant. The production units furnished to CPSES conform to the qualified configurations.

D moviewcn n.x. xundu ' N K Km b DATc 7!~2.3 S 2.

J

....._.._......-.m..

peg 3 g cg g, , ,-

t EgpIF,qm 1A3CATIOgg 4 Mrc. Asse0RMA L/ACC- Elev t post- Ex7prMrs oPERAntLITY I Typt/CATEco#T STRUCT./ AREA ' TYPE /MODEL l'AR AMD:Ts ft ACCURACY OUAL. QUAL. 7 iREOUIRED i MM 84 0 3' m nw mm LUE tUS m mon m.

Electric Reactor y Bunker kemperature:! 268F 340F Penetration Building / Notes 4.5yr sN/A N/A 40 Typc B12' #

Ramo Cor Pressure: 48.lpsig 105psig 1s3 (see.

. 23;.

Assemblies / Containment Header Relative years Test

. CS-atagory a wall and Plate type Humidity: Note 2) and 100% Satura-valve isola- design Analysis ~

ted tion tanks. Steam Chemistry: Spray: 13 pray:

2300 ppm 3000 ppm boric  :>oric acid icid bufered aufered with HaOH with HaC1!

to a ph Lo a ph of 8.6 to ll.

10.

Radiation: 1,92xlOB 2-3x108 '

RAD RAD

1. EPA's use d in CPSES C: @ + b) Q) ass IE circuits are rec uired to maintain both functionsl integrity for the dura tion of the accid ent. EPA's used in Non-Class lE operat ility a id mechanical only mecranical integi ity for the duration of the accident.

circui :s are require l to inintain

2. All EPA's demonstratec both funct ional operal:llity and riechanica environment, except the Non-Class IE medium voltage EPA,'s. 1 integrity fo r the guivalent of 4.5 yrs accident for four hours and mechanical integrity for the equivalent of 4.5 years accident environmentMed:,um voltage ;y EP I

l 1

3. Accident duration is assumed to be 1 year.

r; u.' O 3 - - O ' ARMS

. , 3 ,

INDEXED

p. r T W ' ' ML l Gikabs S Hill,Inc.

f3 "

-.'.___ _ __.. s u:h August 10, 1982 8 & R Occ O!ST.

7e -

GTN-60757 -

m EB TNU ---.b

~~

N 7 f, h* Texas Utilities Generating Company ..

puj gi n. t e

Post Office Box 1002

}I e b Ok Glen Rose, Texas 76043 PRJb T 1,1. ,

g J O Attention: Mr. J.T. Merritt QA MGR.

/ PROJECT CONT. EbN.

g O Manager of Construction and Engineering

• h 'p TUGC0 QA

,.3 p Gentiemen:

PROJECT GEN. fdGR.

• TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY

-i COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ARMS d G&H PROJECT NO. 2323 VENDOR LETTER NO. DTF-148 DATE 6-28-82, P.O. NO. CP-0460 ELEC. PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES & ACCESSORIE0 -

By copy of this letter, we enclose to the vendor stc l.-

" Approved Except as Noted for Arrangement Only - Precccd with mped Af7N g Fabrication, Subject to Compliance with all Contract Require-ments, Drawings and Specifications," the following drawing:

Anco Engineers, Inc.

(Formerly - Amphenol Sams) 50021526 Rev. F Electrical Penetration Arrangement Sheet 2 of 2 The vendor is requested to revise the above drawing as indicated thereon and resubmit one reproducible and four prints by September 7, 1982 for our review and final approval.

By copy of this letter, we also enclose to the vendor stamped

" Approved for Arrangement Only - Proceed with Fabrication, Sub-joct to Compliance with all Contract Requirements, Drawings and Specifications," the following drawings and specification:

Anco Engineers, Inc.

(Formerly - Amphenol Sams) 9 ,j g g gpec. No. 123-2286 -

Procedure-Rework LV Module s 5 Sheets Pigtails 50018647 Rcv. G Welding Neck Flange 50021526 Rev. F Electrical Penetration Sheet 1 of 2 Arrangement 50021914 Rev. M Bolt-On Penetration Ass'y.

Sheet 1 of 2 10 IPS 50021914 Rev. M Sheet 2 of 2 Bolt,-On gene.tratioq, Ass /;yr 1{ @Sgs,';j. ui.f'd WYi U? LI it e.nn eim issa s..nin e. ) o.r.ct o . r.i..:a3447smas744 N % N e toooi as2 7eo- 4 4 38 c.oi.: cionssitt. New Yc rk rno.n..r..o..sn r.

Constructors 10

g

[3l '

O.

s Texas Utilities Generating Company August 10, 1982 GTN-60757 Anco Engineers, Inc. (Cont'd)

(Formerly - Amphenol Sams) 50022052 Rev. D Installation Pen. Assembly Sheet 1 of 3 Instr. & Control 50022052 Rev. D Installation Pen. Assembly Sheet 2 of 3 Instr. & Control 50022052 Rev. D Installation Pen. Assembly Sheet 3 of 3 Instr. & Control

• The vend'or is requested to refer to the above "GTN" number in any transmittals resulting from this letter.

Very truly yours, GIBBS & HILL, Inc.

t REBa-DAS:pk Robstt,g. E21.eudg Jr.

One Copy Proje,ct Managet B&R) site original (w/2 apert. cards of each dwg. &

1 copy of Spec.)

Mr. D.N. Chapman (TUGCO QA) Dallas (1)

Mr. R.A. Jones (TUGCO) field office (1) (w/l apert. card of each dwg. & 1 copy of Spec.)

Mr. C. Smith (Anco Engineers) (2) (w/l print & 1 repro. of each dwg. & 1 copy of Spec.)

[E !MFO!EATi0ii DNL'l

1

' ) BUNKER . RAMO CORFORATZON to

, 3 Y*31"S- AMPHENOL NORTH AMERfCA 23-2286

, g . SAMS OPERATION *#ECI'#I# "" ""

j TPPROVEDBY 6.N-O-SPECIFICATION M. Aaron a m Ex ar N A- . RIs. cart 2-M-@

L. Lhota Process N CATE 7 Mk 2.u.-sz TYPE OF SPECIFICATION

{

- n.u

CODE IDENT. NO. 06473 1 PROCEDURE TO REWORK L.V. MODULE PIGTAIL ASSEMBLIES

~

1

. TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH

_ DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.

Revision Record 2 1.0 Scope 3

2.0 Module Assemblies , 3 3.0 Inspection 4

4 JUN,281s82 FOR CUSTOMER DRAWING REVIEW APPROVAL i

, g e I

i

? d- 4 ( 2.3

3. : ELJNKm l -e lease Nc.:

.'t r: a.'P r.]

duc: a.

u,=ica .-

nama c ,, _ c-u s2__

• ' kg C -

Type of Release: ,J App;cvec-[:y.E:gW er- M et EIvb hc .qq Eng:3. ? :j.,No:-

oA t- 23-8t- - ...

• Da e'y g43 yod. . :a: .Cf

. No.: .

App: ved-E g:g. F.gr. 3 gc3 Cl8BS L SIZI ?i?. NtaEa , - .24. HILL. INC.DI3C?m. J DcC.

cN Cc. DIsIcuA-.cu Al l '2 3 - 2*2- 8 6 l - l PRoce'Doce t o AE'WC AK lpq l h/ P.S I l l 1.l/. MODUL E 9/67?1/t- ASSY l l i I -

I i l l l l l l l l l-l l l l l l.

I I I i I I i l l I I I I I

• ' I I I l l l APPROVCD Ff* sf A rt ,r A N f* E M E N

• O N., w l l g l, PeOCECD w,TH rAcRe;"AT C?e 1 SU.JcCT TD COMPL,ANCf" WITH l l I ALL bCN3HAs.I 4(L . 6 4 . b s*i b 6 4..

I I o ,. ..,~ o .. A - o . . c c .',, c . . . c ~ . .

l l i I l n 1 aim 1 0 m i I I I I I

%  ! I j N l l l Genos & Hitt. INC.

A l vontus,otmaus. J u, .v%

l l l g I l l wcw von < .

l l

l I I j

I l I I I-l i l l

! l 1 -

l l l C: n t:c l,l, e ci c.=p'ies of old. '

l *  ? cj ec: Unique - PU Nuclez:

ovisions :o be das royed I f** II 3C L*V'l - 1  ?::d*C:8

' 5  : *: - Cely bv racisie- .

L Ses:1cci Check One ND. lQ:7 Da:e Schedule D' '

l O cust:mer Cone:21 (if yes, esse:13e) 1 II I l 2

O Cus:ccer App cval Required ? 1c To l l l l P.ak.ing Ac7 Change.

3 l l l C. C:s :=e App:cval Requi ed ?:i:: To i l l -l l .wung A=7 Csa=se, If ?t:, ro:= c:

5 l l l I Tune:ica Are Alf ac:ed.

. ..g ..

e l l l l O send <xerts'es ht :s .To .Cass,:g :ie r . \!

7 l I I  !

3 OO other Require ===:s : TuSI/

8 I I 9  !

I Cus:cce: Na=e d o MAN C#0~ &

Prog:z=s 10 uI I & b g g l ///t L EN85<

- ~

}

AMPHENOl NORTH AMERICA

/ ..,s.oArc 6-24-82 SAMS OPERATION BUNKER RAM 0 CORPORATION uo, 123-2286 nw .

4 CMNCE DATE PAGC- 2 OF 5 REVISION RECORD REY _

LTR DATE ECN SECTION & PAGE DESCRIPTION NO.

6-24-82 Entire Document Initial draft dated 2-26-82 Released per ERN 4123 8 -E- #L-l

?

l t

4 7 -p, - s- I

.'i 3 V

. g.,,g,

' . ~.i.V Ui 10

{

, The revision letter (or nua:bar) of this sheet is the revision letter (or nuesber) of the entire document.

' * ,, SUNKER RAMO CORPORATION -

s?tc; M. _193-2286 > ty.-

\ A PHENot. NORTH AMERICA SAMS OPERATION mt - 3 cr_ 5 U

t 1.0 SCOPE:.

This procedure describes the method to rework spliced connections thatirboard the have minimum end only.insulation overlap. This rework is required at 2.0 MODULE ASSEMBLIES:

50028232-13 -

30#8

-14 -

26f8

-15 -

22#8

-16 -

15f8 LOCATION: lE10 & 2E10 lE20 & 2E20 1E25 & 2E25 lE56 & 2E56 lE21 & 2E21 lE27 & 2E27 lE22 & 2E22 1E70 & 2E70 1E23 & 2E23 lE67 & 2E67 lE24 & 2E24 DISCPIPAHCY:

Heat shrink sleeving covering spliced area does not have adequate overlap of splice and wire insulation area.

DISPOSITION: Rework splice area per this procedure.

MATERIALS: Okonite #35 - jacketing tape.

REWORK:

Identify modules with discrepancy and rework as follows:

2.1 Separate conductors enough to allow sufficient space between them for tape wrapping.

2.2 Starting a minimum of

' 1h inch before the shrink sleeve, (covering the splice) spiral wrap tape with a 50% overlap l covering the shrink sleeve and both wire insulations. Spiral wrap should extend at least 1 inch beyond opposite.endr of shrink sleeve. See Fig 1(B). ,,

.- . ...)- :;:

-on

' {3{,1 s t ,. L '-

I l

.. 3ONKER RAMO CORPORATION k.J -'

57tc. wi. _'123-2286 nry. AMPHENGL NORTri AMERICA

,._ SAMS OPERATION 4

\ ,'

nct- w5 2.3 To ensure removal .of module pigtail assembly,through the ,

header plate, the wire bundle cannot exceed 2.40 inches diameter. .

3.0 _INSPECTIGN

O Completed module pigtail assemblies must pass the following visual and electrical tests.

3.1 Visual - Inspect tape wrap for uniformity and approximate 50% overlap.

3.2 Insulation Resistance - Conductors shall be tested at 8

500VDC for a minimum insulation resistance of 1 x 10 OHMS.

3.3

_ Dielectric Withstandina Voltace - Conductors shall be at 2200 VAC for one minute minimum, conductor-to-conductor within a module and conductor-to-ground.

I NOTE:

To be acceptable, leakage current at specified voltage shall be less than 10mA.

a

. - ..y*  %

gm I. ... .

(

_' . . 'lr; v.:.sU*** a.s I i i

/

'c*

munnen nAnu CORPORATION

,l.MPHENOL NORTH AMERICA

,5PEC; ,

d ,, 101  ??

REY. -

'SAMS OPERATION 5

. Pact cr 5 MODULE -

SHBNC SLEEVE SPL/CE l ff/////b e' l V/////7)

-~ *- .50 miu.

3HBNY SLEEVE #"

FIGURE 1(A) r lN /// d 7

s

/. 5 - ;c -

a r, /.5 m/N.

mity MODULE' OKOMTE w.25 TAPE 50% DEELAP FIGURE 1(B)

MjI{Ok r G.

M.

~

g- ,

.- s

@- l COPRNCHE PEAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION

• ENVIR0tMENTAL QUALIFICATIOP( CERTIFICATION SHEET FOR .

CLASS 1E ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

!. The envirorynental qualification for the equipnent covered by Rev. 1 of Equipnent Qualification Docunentation Review Fom

. ES-12 _ _ _

is found to be acceptable for COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION in Class 1E applications as noted in the review fonn and per the justification in Section II.

II. The qualification infonnation was evaluated per the CPSES Environmental Qualification of Class IE Equipment Certification Procedure. The qualification of this equipnent is justified by the qualification doctr;ents listed on the attached review form, the checklist and coninents providea on the attached review fom and the following conrnents:

JXL , 02 isle2-

"/L Us

,d ~ .d J/ /v4/W .

(

.s .

j t3

l

• ~' . . _ __ ,- - ~. -

V a.u Z t. q !

,~

COMANCllE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION IY; IEEE 323-1974 CLASS IE EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ,'"'"'}

7.,.

'N...

DOCUMENTATION REVIEW FORM u.. ,l .

A.

EQUIPMENT / DOCUMENTATION IDENTIFICATION

1. i .,. I'~%y 4f SPECIFICATION NO. 2323-ES-12 2. VENDOR BUNKER-RAMO CORP.

3.

APPLICABLE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS:

STATUS TRANSMITTAL DOCUMENT (AEN, APP) (GTN t. DATE)

(a) Design Qualification Report /123-2233,Rev.7 APP. GTN-60ll8, 7/2/82 (b) Heating Analysis, 123-2232,Rev. 7 APP. GTN-60118, 7/2/82 Design Qualification Test Procedure (C) 123-2159, Rev. Sa APP. [GTN-60076.7/1/82 (d) Seismic Report, 123-2159-16, Rev. 5 APP. GTN-59972, 6/25/82 Seismic Qualification of Junction (e) __ Boxes , 123-2291, Rev. O APP.

_ GTN-59769. 6/16/82 (f) Stress Report, 123-2162, Rev. C APP.

TN- 60393, 7/21/82 l1 (g) y (h) _

4. CLASS IE EQUIPMENT / FUNCTION (per specification):

' Electric Penetration Assemblies provide a means for the continuity of power, control and signal circuits throug'h the CPSES containment structure pressure barrier (or valve isolation tanks), while maintaining the integrity of the barrier .

1 i

S. QUALIFICATION METHOD (S) Combination of type test and analysis.

I REVIEWER N.x. xuNDu Wf(""2m DATE 7/ 2 3 / 87-REVIEWER N.K.KUNDU M N ((u" DATE 8/2.b/b7-REV. 1

SPEC. 2323-ES-12A

,.. B. QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST DOC /PAGE REr NO N/A 1. DOES DOCUMENTATION ADDRESS ALL IE 3a/35 thru 40a.

EQUIPF.ENT SPECIFIED7 YES @ N/A 2. DOES DOCUMENTATION ADDRESS CPSES 3a/57 (See Remark 2).

SPECIFIC PARAFITERS?

h NO N/A 2a DO NORMAL PARAMETERS FOR QUALIFIED LIFE AND AGING EhvElcPE CPSES NORMAL 3a/4 and 4a. (See Remark 2a)

PARAMETERS?

h NO N/A 2b. DO ABNORMAL /ACCIDEh7 PARAMETERS USED IN QUALIFICATION ENVELOPE CPSES 3a/57 and 58.

ABNORMAL / ACCIDENT PARAPETERS?

h NO N/A 3. IS DOCUPIh7ATION AUDITABLE AND TRACEABLE 'IO CPSES EQUIPPIhT?

3a, 3b and 3e/ front cover pages (See Remark h NO N/A 4. IS QUALIFIED LIFE EXPLICITLY STATED? 3a/27 h NO N/A 4a. DO AGING RESULTS SUPPORT THE QUALIFIED LIFE?

3a/4,4a and 4b-h NO N/A 5. DOES QUALIFICATION METHOD (S) CONFORM NITH IEEE STD. 323-1974?

3c/I NO N/A Sa. DOES TEST SEQUENCE CONFORM TO 3c/61 (See Remark Sa) 3 IETI STD. 323-19747 h NO N/A 6. ARE FAILURE CRITERIA FOR TESTS DEFINED?

3c/throughout test procedure.

NO N/A 7. IF THE EQUIPPIh7 W3ULD BE EXPOSED 3a/20 thru 26-g TO DBA, WAS QUALIFICATION BY TYPE TEST?

h NO N/A 8. DOES DEt10NSTT TED OPERABILITY ENVELOPE CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

3a/33a.

h NO N/A Ba. DOES NON-DETRIMENTAL. FAILURE ENVELOPE CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

See Remark Ba.

YES N/A 9. ARE MARGINS DEFINED? See Remark 9 & 9a h @NO N/A 9a. DO MARGINS MEET OR EXCEED IEEE STD. 323-1974?

See Remark 9 & 9a h NO N/A 10. ARE INSTALLATION AND MOUNTING INTER- 3c/6,7 & 8.

FACES, AS REQUIRED FOR QUALIFICATION, (See Remark 10).

.oECIFIED?

YES NO h 11. ARE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AND COMPONENT REPLACEMENT INTERVALS See Remark 11.

SPECIFIED?

l t

e 4

Q g 4 6 O

B.

OUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (Cont'd) DOC /PAGE Rrr

12. AGING METHODOLOGY h NO, N/A 12a. WAS ARRHENIUS METHODOLOGY USED IN 3a/4 (See Remark 12a AGING PER NUREG 0588?

h NO N/A 12b. ARE THERMAL AGING PARAMETERS JUSTIFIED? 3a/4a YES h N/A 12c. WAS THE TEMPERATURE USED FOR ACCELERATED See Remark 312 THERMAL AGING VERIFIED TO BE LESS THAN TEMPERATURES AT WHICH KNOWN MATERIAL PHASE CHANGES OCCUR PER NUREG 0588?

YES NO h 12d. WAS MECHANICAL AGING JUSTIFIED See Remark 12d (CYCLIC DUTY REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED)?

h NO N/A 12e. i.

DOES RADIATION AGING ENVELOPE 3a/10-CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

h NO N/A 12e. ii. WAS COBALT 60 USED FOR THE RADIATION 3a/10 SOURCE?

YES h N/A 12f. HAVE KNOWN SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS BEEN See Remark 12f CONSIDERED PER NUREG 0588?

4 mm- -

PAGE 4 of 8

. ' CHECKLIST REMARKS 2)

The qualification documentation does not address specific CPSES's normal service parameters.

However, B-R states on 3a/29 that the EPA's will meet the requirements of CPSES's specific normal service parameters as given in the equipment specification.

CPSES's specific abnormal / accident environmental parameters are addressed on

'3a/57.

2a)

The thermal aging parameters used in the type testing are based upon thermal degradation of the module and module seal materials. The thermal aging parameter used was 121*C for 9 days. This accelerated aging is equivalent to 85.92*C for 40 years on the basis of Arrhenius methodology (see 3a/4a) . The actual operating temperature of these materials is less than 82'C for the specific CPSES average EPA ambient temperature of 45*C (50'C for inside con- 1 tainment and 40*C for outside containment, see 3b/33). Hence, it can be concluded that the normal parameters for qualified life and aging envelope specific CPSES normal parameters, with margin.

3)

Docueents able 3c and to specific 3d are CPSES generic in nature and alone are not auditable or trace-equipment.

However, these two documents are referenced in document 3a, which is auditable and traceable to specific CPSES equipme n. t Sa)

The partial dischage (corona) test as required by IEEE Std. 317-1976, and the BIL test as required by Regulatory Guide 1.63, revision 2 were performed on separate specimens (other than those which were tested per test sequence shown on 3c/61) to demonstrate design compliance.-

Ba)

Test failures are indicated on 3a/5 through'8, 10, 16, 22 and 23 The vendor 4

has analyzed these failures and has taken appropriate corrective desig n actions to eliminate CPSES. the causes of these failures in the production units f urnished to 9 & 9a) Margins are not specifically defined.

However, by comparing the CPSES specific accident environmental parareters to the actual parar.eters used in the generic type testing, we find that margins meet or exceed IEEE Std.

values. 323-1974 recommended checklist.These margins are quantified below, and indicated on Page 8 of this ABNORMAL /ACC. ENVIRON. EXTREMES PIF.

PARAMETER 'PIOUIRED DEM MARGIN DOCUMENT Temperature: 268F 340F + 72F 3a/57 Pressure: 48.1 psig 105 psig + 118% 3a/57 Relative 1 Humidity: 100% Satura- N/A 3a/57 ted Steam Chemistry: Spray: Spray: N/A 3a/57 2300 ppm 3000 ppm boric boric acid acid bufered bufered with NaOH with NaOH to a ph of to a ph 8.6 to 10 of 11.

Radiation: 1.92x10 2.112x10 . + 10% 3a/10 RAD RAD (a + b)

(g)

I

, Page 5 of 8 Checklist Remarks (Cont'd)

10) Per 3c/8, the. installation and mounting used during the type test simulated the plant installed configuration. The field installation and mounting

, procedures are given in the Bunker-Ramo (B-R) Instruction Manual Numbers 123-2101; 123-2098; 123-2216; 123-2245; and 123-2246.

11) No specific maintenance requirements and component replacement intervals are indicated since the EPA's have a qualified life of 40 years.

12a) Arrhenius methodology was used to determine the thermal aging parameters for module material and module seals. The 10'C half-life empirical rule was used in thermal aging of temperature stable O-ring and terminal block materials.

The aging life of cable insulation was determined by the individual cable manufacturers and is qualified in accordance with IEEE Std. 383-1974. See 3a/4, 4a, 4b and 3c/15 through 18 for details.

12c) No known material phase changes have been identified by the vendor or the reviewer.

f 12d) Mechanical cyclic duty is not applicable to Electric Penetration Assemblies (EPA) since it is comprised of all stationary components.

12f)

No known synergistic effects have been identified by the vendor or thereviewer.]1 4 -

c - . -

Paga 6 of 8 C. QUALIFICATION CONTINGENCIES DOC /PAGE.REF

1. MAINTENANCE INTERVALS No special maintenance intervals are indicated in the qualification docu-mentation.

2. REPLACEMENT INTERVALS No specific component replacement in-tervals are indicated in the qualification documentation, since the EPA's are qualified for 40 years.

3. STORAGE REQUIREMENTS No special storage requirements are in-dicated in the qualification documentation.

General storage requirements are shown in Bunker-Ramo Procedure No. 123-2215.

(

4. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS See checklist remark, Item No. 10,

5. MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS Weld all around the weld neck Per equipment flange to nozzle, specification and 3c/6,7,

" age o or o

.s' e ,

D. REMARKS -

The type testing was perfomed in accordance with IEEE Std. 317-1976, the daughter document to IEEE Std. 323-1974. This test was generic.

in nature and in many instances imposed more severe environmental parameters and more stringent acceptance criteria than those required for CPSES. Consequently, there were some failures during the test, for which the manufacturer had to improve the original design of certain components and discard certain configurations from the qualification program and their use in the plant. The production units furnished to CPSES conform to the qualified configurations.

i REVIEWER N.K. Kundu NNKM DATE -

7 3 f> 2.

i

+

r- ~

~ ' E. ENVIRONMENTAL QUAlstFICATInN

SUMMARY

DATA PC90 0 Of 8. .

I t E frMENT LOCATION MFC. ATNORMAL/ACC. ENVIRON. EXTRFMES CPERN2tLITY ACCU 2ACY QUAL.

lyyr /cATEcoRY STRUCT./ AREA TYPE /**^ Nf. I* AII AN ET h rt i REOUIRED l'8 H DEM QUAL. }pfb HEU F100 D i.m LIFE MET 110D REP. SU.{

plectric Reactor Bunker ' Temperature:! 268F 340F Notes 4.5yr ; N/A ban 2traticn Building / N/A 40 Type B12 2333.

Ramo Corp Pressure: 48.lpsig 105psig 1&3 (see-NTEemblies/ Contairiment years Test ES-1.

Header Relative. Note 2) and

cttgory a wall and Plate type Humidity: 100% Satura- Analysis valve isola- design ted tion tanks. Steam .

Chemistry: Spray: ISpray:

2300 ppm 3000 ppm ,

boric boric acid acid .

bufered >ufered with Nacl! with Nacl!

to a ph to a pn of 8.6 to ll.

10.

Radiation: 1,92x108 2.112x108 I l

g RAD RAD

1. EPA's ust d in CPSES Class lE circ uits are rec aired to m I Sf b) ($)

integrity for the durttion of thc. accid ent. EPA's used tintain both functionsl operat ility a Td mechanical only meet ani. cal integrity for thc. duration of in Non-Class lE circui :s are require I to ruintain the accident. -

2. All EPA's demonstratec both funct ional operatility and riechanicz l integi ity for the eguivalent of ,4.5 yrs accident environment, except the medium voltage EPA's used in Non-Class lE circu:.ts. Medium voltage EPA's demonstrated functional operability 'for four hours and mechanical integrity for the equivalent of 4.5 years accident environment. 1 I l i

3. Accident duration is assumed to be 1-yea ~r.

-p,,-* 'l I CC %NCHE PEtX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION EiWIR0!;4 ENTAL QUALIFICATION CERTIFICATION SHEET FOR CLASS 1E ELECTRICAL EQUITAENT -

1. The environmental qualification for the equipent covered by Rev.2 of Equipent Qualification Doctnentation Review Fom

'ES-12 is found to be acceptable for CDMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION in Class IE applications as noted in'the review fom and per the justification in Section II.

II. The qualification infomation was evaluated per the CPSES Envirormental Qualification of Class IE Equipment Certification Procedure. The qualification of this equipent is justified by the qualification doctrents listed on the attached review fom, the checklist and coments provided on the attached review fom and the following cocoents:

ign ture D te f ... .. . 4 p . .- Y [?

b dad f 3/b'/n

/Jur% ~ A <

6 273 S

4 t

4 e

J e

• r a y t- 1 O! O COMANCliE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION IEEE 323-1974 CLASS IE EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION -

DOCUMENTATION REVIEW FORM A.

EQUIPMENT / DOCUMENTATION IDENTIFICATION

1. SPECIFICATION NO. 2323-Es-12 2. VENDOR BUNKER-RAMO CORP.

3, APPLICABLE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS:

STATUS TRANSMITTAL DOCUMENT (AEN, APP) (GTN & DATE)

(a) Design Qualification Report /123-2233,Rev.7 APP. GTN-60ll8, 7/2/82 (b) Heating Analysis, 123-2232,Rev. 7 APP. GTN-60ll8, 7/2/82 Design Qualification Test Procedure (c) 123-2159, Fev. 'ia APP. GTN-60076, 7/1/82 (d) Seismic Report, 123-2159-16, Rev. 5 APP. GTN-59972, 6/25/82 Seismic Qualification of Junction (e) Boxes, 123-2291, Rev. O APP. GTN-59769. 6/16/82

{f) Stress Report, 123-2162, Rev. C APP. . GTN- 60393, 7/21/82 (g)_

y (h)

4. CLASS IE EQUIPMENT / FUNCTION (per specification):

Electric Penetration Assemblies provide a means for the continuity of power, control and signal circuits through the CPSES containment structure pressure barrier (or valve lsolation tanks), while maintaining the integrity of the barrier.

6 s  %

5. QUALIFICATION METHOD (S) Combination of type test and analysis.

REVIEWER N.K. KUNDU A/ ~

W DATE 13 b1 REVIEWER N.K.KUNDU MNkw DATE S/ 2 b f 87- Rrv.1 REVIEWER N.K.KUNDU AI K LA M A DATE Il 2.7- M 7-. REV.2 A

SPEC. 2323-ES-12A

,',. B. QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST DOC /PAGE REF NO N/A 1. DOEG DOCUMENTATION ADDRESS ALL IE 3a/35 thru 40a.

EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED?

YES @ N/A 2. DOES DOCUMENTATION ADDRESS CPSES 3a/57 (See Remark 2).

SPECIFIC PARAMETERS?

h NO N/A 2a DO NORMAL PARAMETERS FOR QUALIFIED 3a/4 and 4a, (See Remark LIFE AND AGING ENVE14PE CPSES NORMAL 2a)

PARAMETERS?

h NO N/A 2b. DO ABNORMAL / ACCIDENT PARAMETERS USED 3a/57 and 58.

IN QUALIFICATION ENVELOPE CPSES ABNORMAL /ACCIDEhr PARAMETERS?

h NO N/A 3. IS DOCUMENTATION AUDITABLE AND TRACEABLE TO CPSES EQUIPMENT?

3a, 3b and 3e/ front cover pages (See Remark h NO N/A 4. IS QUALIFIED LIFE EXPLICITLY STATED? 3a/27 h NO N/A 4a. DO AGING RESULTS SUPPORT THE 3a/4,'a 4 and 4b.

QUALIFIED LIFE 7 h NO N/A 5. DOES QUALIFICATION METHOD (S) CONFORM WITH IEEE STD. 323-1974?

3c/1 NO N/A Sa. DOES TEST SEQUENCE CONFORM TO 3c/61 (See Remark Sa)

IEEE STD. 323-19747 h NO N/A 6. ARE FAILURE CRITERIA FOR TESTS DEFINED?

3c/throughout test procedure, NO N/A 7. IF THE EQUIPMENT WOULD BE EXPOSED 3a/20 thru 26 9 TO DBA, WAS QUALIFICATION BY TYPE TEST?

h 'NO N/A 8. DOES DEMONSTRATED OPERABILITY 3a/33a.

ENVELOPE CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

h NO N/A Sa. DOES NON-DETRIMENTAL FAILURE See Remark Ba.

ENVELOPE CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

YES N/A 9. ARE MARGINS DEFINED? See Remark 9 & 9a h @NO N/A 9a. DO MARGINS MEET OR EXCEED IEEE STD. 323-1974? See Remark 9 & 9a

@ NO N/A 10. ARE INSTALLATION AND MOUNTING INTER- 3c/6,7 & 8.

FACES, AS REQUIRED FOR QUALIFICATION, (See Remark 10) .

SPECIFIED?

YES NO h 11. ARE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AND COMPONENT REPLACEMENT INTERVALS See Remark 11 SPECIFIED?

I raoc 3 07 6

\

1 B. i QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (Cont'd) DOC /PAGE REF i 12.- AGING METHODOLOGY h NO N/A 12a.

WAS ARRHENIUS METHODOLOGY USED IN 3a/4 (See Remark 12 AGING PER NUREG 0588?

h NO N/A 12b. ARE THERMAL AGING PARAMETERS JUSTIFIED? 3a/4a YES h N/A 12c.

WAS THE TEMPERATURE USED FOR ACCELERATED See Remark 12 THERMAL AGING VERIFIED TO BE LESS THAN TEMPERATURES AT WHICH KNOWN MATERIAL PHASE CHANGES OCCUR PER NUREG 0588?

YES NO h 12d. WAS MECHANICAL AGING JUSTIFIEDSee Remark 12d (CYCLIC DUTY REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED)?

h NO N/A 12e. i.

DOES RADIATION AGING ENVELOPE 3a/10 -

CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

h NO N/A 12e. ii.

WAS COBALT 60 USED FOR THE RADIATION 3a/10 SOURCE?

YES h N/A 12f.

HAVE KNOWN SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS BEEN See Remark 12f CONSIDERED PER NUREG 0588?

.  ; PAGE 4 of 8 CHECKLIST REMARKS

2) The qualification documentation does not address specific CPSES's' normal

-service parameters. However, B-R states on 3a/29 that the EPA's will meet the requirements of CPSES's specific normal service parametcrs as given in the equipment specification.

CPSES's specific abnormal / accident environmental parameters are addressed on 3a/57.

2a) The thermal aging parameters used in the type testing are based upon thermal degradation of the module and module seal materials. The thermal aging parameter used was 121*C for 9 days. This accelerated aging is equivalent to 85.92*C for 40 years on the basis of Arrhenius methodology (see 3a/4a). The actual operating temperature of these materials is less than 82*C for the specific CPSES average EPA ambient temperature of 45'c (50*C for inside con-tainment and 40*C for outside containment, see 3b/33). Hence, it can be concluded that the normal parameters for qualified life and aging envelope specific CPSES normal parameters, with margin.

3)

Documents 3c and 3d are generic in nature and alone are not auditable or trace-able to specific CPSES equipment. However, these two documents are referenced in document 3a, which is auditable and traceable to specific CPSES equipment .

Sa)

The partial dischage (corona) test as required by IEEE Std. 317-1976, and the BIL test as required by Regulatory Guide 1.63, revision 2 were performed on separate on 3c/61) specimens (other than those which were tested per test sequence shown to demonstrate design compliance.-

8a)

Test failures are indicated on 3a/5 through 8, 10, 16, 22 and 23 .

The vendor has analyzed these failures and has taken appropriate corrective designons acti to eliminate the causes of these failures in the production units furniseh to CPSES. d 9&9a. Margins are not specifically defined. However, by comparing the CPSES specific accident environmental parameters to the actual parameters used in the generic type testing, we find that margins meet or exceed IEEE Standard 323-1974 recommended values , Per NUREG-0588, no margin in ra- R.2 diation dose is required since the postulated dose has been chiculated per NUREG-0588 requirements.

inAlcated on page 8 of this checklist.These margins are quantified on page 5 and

I-m Page 5 of 8 Checklist Remarks (Cont'd)

ABNORMAL /ACC. ENVIRON. EXTREMES REF.

PARAMETER REOUIRED DEM MARGIN DOCUMENT Temperature: 268F 340F + 72F 3a/57

, Pressure: 48.1 psig '105 psig + 118% 3a/57 i Relative Humidity: 100% Satura- N/A 3a/57 ted Steam Chemistry: Spray: Spray: N/A 3a/57 2300 ppm 3000 ppm boric boric acid acid

bufered bufered I with NaOH with NaOH to a ph of to a ph 8.6 to 10. of 11.

1 i

! Radiation: 1.92x108 2.0x108 +41 U2 3a/10 i Rad Rao R.2 (1) See Remark 9& 9a

) 10) Pe.r 3c/8, the installation and mounting used during the type test simulated-the plant installed configuration. The field installation and mounting procedures are given in the Bunker-Ramo (B-R) Instruction Manual Numbers 123-2101; 123-2098; 123-2216; 123-2245; and 123-2246.

11) No specific maintenance requirements and component replacement intervals are indicated since the EPA's have a qualified life of 40 years.

12a) Arrhenius methodology was used to determine the thermal aging parameters for module material and module seals. The 10'C half-life empirical rule was used in thermal aging of temperature stable O-ring and terminal block materials.

The aging life of cable insulation was determined by the individual cable manufacturers and is qualified in accordance with IEEE Std. 383-1974. See 3a/4, 4a, 4b and 3c/15 through 18 for details.

12c) No known material phase changes have been identified by the vendor or the reviewer.

• 12d) Mechanical cyclic duty is not applicable to Electric Penetration Assemblies (EPA) since it is comprised of all stationary components.

12f) No known synergistic effects have been identified by the vendor or the reviewer

, Page 6 of 8 C. QUALIFICATION CONTINGENCIES DOC /PAGE REF

1. MAINTENANCE INTERVALS No special maintenance intervals are indicated in the qualification docu-mentation.

2. REPLACEMENT INTERVALS No specific component replacement in-tervals are indicated in the qualification documentation, since the EPA's are qualified for 40 years.

3. STORAGE REQUIREMENTS No special storage requirements are in-dicated in the qualification documentation.

General storage requirements are shown in Bunker-Ramo Procedure No. 123-2215.

4. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS

. See -checklist rerbark,' Item No. 10,

5. MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS Weld all around the weld neck Per equipment flange to nozzle, specification and 3c/6,7,

_, s___. ._. _-. . . - - - -- , -

-M

, . s- ~~

~

. 1 D. .- REMARKS The type testing was performed in accordance with IEEE Std. 317-1976, the daughter document to IEEE Std. 323-1974. This test was generic in nature and in many instances imposed more severe environmental parameters and more stringent acceptance criteria than those required for CPSES. Consequently, there were some failures during the test, for which the manufacturer had to improve the original design of certain components and discard certain configurations from the qualification Program and their use in the plant. The production units furnished to CPSES conform to the qualified configurations.

?

e 4

REVIEWER N.K. Kundu NNbM oxrE 7/u/s2.

.n ,

E. ENVIRONMr.NTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

DATA pCg3 8 of S. ,

I f EQUIPMENT LOCATION MFG. _ ABNORMAL /ACC. ENVIRON. EXTRFMCS OPERAnILITY ACCURACY QUAL. QUAL, USC l Type /CATEcoRY' STRUCT./ AREA TYPE /MoDEL l'An AMF:Tr n iREOUIRED DLH HEU DEM HEQ LIFE

'U METHOD REP- _Ii Electric Reactor .

Bunker Temperature:I 268Fb' 340F Notes 4.5yr sN/A PInetration N/A 40 Type B12 ~23 ?

Building / Ramo Corp Pressure: 48.lpsig 105psig 1 r. 3 (see Ocemblies/ Contairiment years Test 'ES-Header Relative Note 2) and 3tagory a wall and Plate type Humidity: 100% Satura- Analysis valve isola- design ted tion tanks. Steam Chemistry: Spray: l Spray:

2300 ppm 3000 ppm boric boric acid acid bufered )ufered with NaO!! with NaOll to a ph .t;o a ph of 8.6 to L1.

10.

Radiation: 1.92xlO8 2.0x108 '

2 RAD RAD (g + M (S)

1. EPA's use d in CPSES C: ass lE circuits are rec uired to maintain both functional operat ility a Td mechanical integrity for the durz tion of the accid ent. EPA's used only meet anical integrity for the duration of in Non-Class lE circui :s are require 1 totraintain the accident.

2. All EPA's demonstratec both functional operatility and riechanica l integrity for the eguivalent of ,4.5 yrs accident environment, except the medium voltage EPA's used in Non-Class lE circu:.ts. Medium voltage EPA's demonstrated functional operability for four hours and mechanical integrity for the equivalent of 4.5 years accident environment.

l l ' i

3. Accident duration is assumed to be 1-year.

4. The calet lated vapor temperature resulting fr om postulated steari line breakes Lnside the con ;ainment build ing exceeds : 68'F for a short time and reaches a peak value . of 334' F. 2 O

290 ELECTRICAL PENETRATION ASSEMBLY LEAK RATE TEST REPORT UNIT NO. / EPA N0. / E 7 9 DATE/A/42 TIME PRESSURE TEMPEPATURE O 8Off SR YD }=

0 9OV 6~3- ?d f n7 e ~71; o o,a

~'

b I l l

~

< / (

TESTED BY: 4 << M AVERAGE: 6, COO

> QC WITNE

/ 40%) 2/

PERFORM TEST IN A ORDANCE WITH:

Current Revision of Brown & Root Instruction EEI-9 and Gibbs & Hill Specification 2323-ES-12 77/ / ES/S V

~

NOTE: Compare both individual hourly readings and average of the hourly readings. Report excessive leak rates to Electrical Engineering.

IB

.