ML20206N654

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 3 to Procedure TNE-DC-15, Preparation of Equipment Qualification Documentation
ML20206N654
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 05/10/1984
From:
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20206N354 List:
References
FOIA-86-270, FOIA-86-A-87 TNE-DC-15, NUDOCS 8607010497
Download: ML20206N654 (15)
v • d • e


Text

, a v. -

I

'IUGCO 10 CLEAR DGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISIOb ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE CONrBOL O')PY 20. 'INE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 1 OF 16 PREPARATION OF DQUIINENT PREPARED BY NDktd(M '

OUALIFICATION 00CtNENTATION APPROVED BY

/

1.0 GENEPAL 1.1 PURNSE

p tu:nournu nu,v 11 U n m ri. Ul Ull.I St M CEDED 21s procedure establishes the basic guidelines for review of all CPSES vendor Class 1E qualification documentaticn and provides for a consistency in the recording of that review.

1.2 SCOPE his trocedure shall apply to the review of all CPSES vendor Class IE qualification documentation.

1.3 RESMNSIBILITIES We 'RE mnager shall have overall responsibility for review and approval of equipnent qualification for CPSES. Rat responsibility has been delegated to the Supervising Engineer-Electrical and I&C.

1.4 REFERENCES

a. IEEE Std. 323-1974 "IEEE Standard for Qualifying Class 1E Equipnent for Nuclear Ibwer Generating Stations."
b. Ibgulatory Guide 1.89, dated November 1974,

" Qualification of Class 1E Equipnent for Nuclear Power Plants."

c. NUREG-0588 " Interim Staff Position on Ehvironmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Eb.uipnent."
d. CPSES FSAR Section 3.11B " Environmental Design of Hechanical and Electrical Equipment."
e. IEEE Std. 344-1975 "IEEE lbcommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipnent for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" (as endorsed bt Regulatory Guide 1.100).

8607010497 860624 PDR

e

'IUGCO NUCIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE PREPARATION OF LUJIRtENf 00ALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION TNE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 2 OF 16 f.

IEEE Std. 317-1976 "IEEE Standard for Electrical Penetration Assemblies in Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" (as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.63).

g. IEEE Std. 334-1974 "IEEE Standard for 'Iype Tests of Continuous Duty Class 1E lbtors for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" (as endorsed bf R2gulatory Guide 1.40).
h. IEEE Std. 381-1977 " Standard Criteria for 'Iype Tests of Class 1E Modules used in Nuclear Power Generatirq Stations".
i. IEEE Std. 382-1972 "IEEE Trial-Use Guide for Type Test of Class 1 Electric Valve Operators for Nuclear Ibwer Generating Stations" (as endorsed by Tbgulatory Guide 1.73).
j. IEEE Std. 383-1977 " Standard for Type Test of Class IE Electric Cables, Field Splices, and Connections for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" (as endorsed b/

Regulato'f Guide 1.131).

k. IEEE Std. 337-1977 " Standard Criteria for Diesel Generator Units Applied As Standby Power Supplies For Nuclear Generating Stations" (as eMorsed bf Ibgulatory Guide 1.9).

2.0 PROCEDURE The Riviewer, to be assigned b/ the Supervising Faginect-Electrical and I&C, shall be familiar with the requirements md Irovisions of the Ibferences in Section 1.4 and have ready access to copies of thece materials. In addition, the Tuviewer obould be familiar with and have available the latest edition of the purchase specification and changes thereto for the equipment mder review. 'Ihe remainder of this instruction refers to completion of the documentation review form, ( Attachment A).

tore Where different typ2s of categories of equipnent are covered under the same cpecification but were

'11JGCO NJCIIAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE PEVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES IKTE PREPARATION OF BQUIINENT QJALIFICATION DOCtNENTATION 'INE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 4 OF 16 2.1.4 Equipnent/ Function List all equipnent by type or, nodel only (individual tag '

ntsnbers are not necessary) included in the specification and

' provide a brief description of its function. If equipnent is safety related, then state its safety function. Sufficient information shall be trovided to identify the equipment and correlate with the appropriate doctznentation. For example, on specification MS-0203.1, listed equipnent might include "Feedwater Isolation Valve Pneumatic-Hydraulic Operators Madel P/ N38991/Feedwater Isolation Valve Closure," thus the IE equipnent is model P/N 38991 valve oparators and the safety function is operability of the feedwater isolation valves, including operability of renote position indication l sensors.

2.1.5 Qualification Method Identify the nethod or methods used to establish qualifica-tion. Nfer to section 5 of Def.1.4(a) for acceptable methods of qualification.

! 2.2 QJALIFICATION CHECKLIST (Part B of Attachment A) l

' 'Ihe kviewer shall circle the correct response to each question, a yes or no (oe not applicable). 'Ibe appropriate doctanent and prJe ntsnber (s) where the specific information l

is located shall be cital under the "page reference" space provided for each question. Por each question answered with either no or not applicable, an explanation / justification shall be provided in accordance with Section 2.3 of this procedure.

N7rR: tbcuments may be referred to througtout the chedclist by the letter under which the doctanent is listed in Part A.3 of the review form ( Attactsnent A).

l

' 'Ihe majority of the questions are self-explanatory, however the following discussion will help clarify the criteria to bo l

l met in order to answer "Yes" to diedclist items.

'IUGCO 10CIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISIOtW ISSUE PAGE CPSES -[ ATE iMPARATION OF EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION TNE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 3 0F 16 qualified separately, with unique reports submitted for each, individual qualification reviews shall be completed for each. When more than one review fom applies to a given specification, they tall be identified. For example, if specification MS-34 required 3 separate review forms, they diall be identified under item A.1 of Attachment A, as MS-034 (1 of 3) MS-034 (2 of 3), and 16-034 (3 of 3).

2.1 EQUIEMENT/DOCIMENTATION IDENPIFICATION Part A of Attachment A, identifies the equipment and the applicable documentation.

Specification Number Identify the specification ntaber Wn available, or Westinghouse identifier ntaber, for the equipnent under review, e.g. ES-010, MS-600, M3-0208.1, etc.

2.1.2 Vendor Vendor refers to the Erimary equipnent vendor. If some components of the equipnent were purchased frcra subvendors and qualified separately by the subvendor, then the subvendor sinuld be indicated next to the appropriate document entry under item 3.

2.1.3 Applicable Qualification tbcuments All vendor submitted documents required to establish the final equipnent qualification shall tw listed including the revision level of each document (as applicable). 'Ihe.ie shall include qualification plans, qualification reports, seimnic plans, seismic reports, subvendor qualification reports, or, other doctnentation as appropriate. '1he revision level of the equipnent Qualification ciecklist shall be identified

=1jacent to all applicable doctnents listed which have been revised since the grevious equipnent 02alification Oiecklist.

'Ibe status assigned dia11 be indicated for each <betment listed. 'Ihe transmittal ntaber and date for each doctment

  • reviewed shall be listed.- In general, the transmittal will also indicate the doctment status.

O

,'
  • 3 -

l l

l 'IUG00 NOCLEAR ENGINEERING PIOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE l cPSES tate l PREPARATIO*P OF ICUIENENT CUALIFICATION DOCt.NENTATION 'INE-OC-15 3 5-10-84 5 OF 16 i

i 2.2.1 Specified 14uitment 1

Each type or category of equipment to be covered by the documentation shall be explicitly addressed in the reports to assure the auditable link required by Section 6.3.1.1 of

! Reference 1.4(a) and to verify that all CPSES equipr.ent has been qualified as desired.

2.2.2 CPSES Parmeters

' Assure that the documentation incorporates and envelops the CPSES parmeters. See Table 3.11B-2 of Ref.1.4(d) the

! required service environments for both normal and accident conditions. De service parmeters on which the qualified life is based must envelop the CPSES normal parameters and the maximum qualified accident environment must envelop the CPSES abnormal / accident parmeters.

j 2.2.3 Auditable Link As required by Ref.1.4(a) the documentation must establish a traceable link between the actual equipnent qualified and CPSES equipment to assure applicability of the qualification.

2.2.4 Oualified Life ne qualified life determined by the qualification trogram nust be explicitly stated and the aging progem must justify and s2ppet the stated life.

2.2.5 Walification Method me qualification methods and testing sequences (if type tested) shauld conform to the requirenents of Ref.1.4(a) or any deviations should be justified. See Section 5 of Ref.

1.4(a) for acceptable qualification methods. For equipnent I that is type tested, the test sequence should conform to the recomneniations of Sections 6.3.2 of aef.1.4(a). If the test sequence deviates from Ref.1.4(a) reu.a.-dations, then then the methods used must be justifiai as the most severe for the equipnent tested.

l l

6

%m 1

1tJGOD M)CIEAR ENGINEERING PROCED'URE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE PREPARATION OF EQUI 1NENT QJALIFICATION DOCU1ENTATION 'INEE-15 3 5-10-84 6 OF 16 2.2.6 Failure Criteria Specific failure criteria for qualification tests must be defined. If specific acceptance criteria is defined and not meeting one of these is considered a failure, sufficient criteria is provided.

2.2.7 01alification bv 'ivpe Test If the equipment under review should be exposed to the severe environmental extranes of a DBA (IDCA or HEIB) then qualification should be by type test to conclusively demonstrate operability.

2.2.8 Operability

'Ihe qualification program should demonstrate the equipment's operability for the service environment ard time period required for the equipment to fulfill its safety-related function or otherwise desired function if not safety-related. See Table 3.11B-2 of Ref.1.4(d) for

operability requirements and service environment.

2.2.9 Margin For all environmental parameters the margin incorporated into the qualification parameters in excess of the service parameters specified in hf.1.4(d) should be defined. See section 6.3.1.5 of Ref.1.4 (a) for recG, wended levels of margin to be gplied.

2.2.10 Installation and munting

'Ihe installation and mounting requirements should be specified in the doctmentation to assure that the as-built configuration will rut canpromise the qualification. If the actual as-built installation differs fran that used for the qualification tests (or assumed for m malysis) then

, doctmentation shall be required to demonstrate that the deviation does not invalidate the qualification.

e m.

TUGCO NUCIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES IATE PREPARATION OF EQUIPMENP QUALIFICATION DOCLNENTATION TNE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 7 OF 16 2.2.11 Maintenance Any maintenance or companent replacement intervals required to maintain the equipnent's qualified status for the life of the equipnent must be specified.

2.2.12 7qing The qualification nust address the effects of age on the equipment's performance, and provide assurance that the equipment is capable of performing its required function in the end-of-life condition. See section 6.3.3 of Ref. f.4(a) for acceptable aging methods. If accelerated aging techniques were used as part of a type test program, then the methodology must be justified cn the basis of the expected service conditions. Questions 12.a through 12.f refer to accelerated age conditioning aid are self-explanatory.

2.3 CHECKLIST REMARKS Explanation and justification'for any negative or rot applicable respnses to the checklist shall be provided.

Reference the appropriate document and page to support or further explain the remarks, if possible.

Any additional axtments or clarifications necessary to sufficiently sunmarize and assess the adequacy of the qualification p ogram shall be noted.

2.4 QUALIFICATION 00NTINGENCIES (Part C of Attachment A)

Any operating, maintenance, or construction requirements as specified in the qualification doctnentation that must be met to maintain the equipnent's qualified status should be briefly sunmarized with reference made to the appropriate

' qualification document and page Were the requirement is located.

2.5 RE24 ARKS (Part D of Attachment A)

Reviewer to provide any conments which have not been cavered under,checklist relevantremarks.

to Qualification

~~~, .

'IUGCO NJCIEAR DGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE '

PREPARATION OF ECUIPMENT

@ALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION 'INE-DC-15  ? 5-10-84 8 OF 16 2.6 REVIEWER IDENTIFICJTION Reviewer shall sign and date the qualification review form.

(Attachment A). Subsequent issues (revisions) of the review form need only to be indicated and signed on page 1 of the review form.

2.7 ENVIBOtNENTAL WALIFICATION SIM1ARY DWA (Part E of Attachment A)

Reviewer shall fill out the information as applicaole.

NQrES:

1. Operability - Operabilicy is described for those accidents that directly affect the equipr.ent being described. Ebr example, equipt.ent located inside containment would be directly affected by IIXA, MSLB, FLB, or a seicmic event.

Epipment in the control room, however, g would only be directly affected by.a seismic event.

2. Demonstrated - Figures for the actual test conditions /

qualification envelopes are to be taken from the referenced documents.

l 2.8 FILE AND DISTRIBUTION After completion and a final review, the original of the doctrnentation review form shall be retained in the qualifi-cation doctznentation files by the TNE Supervising Engineer -

Electrical and I&C.

  • A qualification documentation package (a package shall consist of the original certificaticri produced per TNE-DC-16, a copf of the documentation review form Iroduced for this procedure and other qualification doctznentatial as applicable) shall be transmitted per Procedure 'INE-AD-4 for retention to the TUGOO Operations Record Center usirg the transmittal form shown in Figure 1.

O 6

s

. ~ ,

TUGCO NJCIEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISIOb ISSUE PAGE CVSES DATE PREPARATION OF EQUIPMENP QJALIFICATION DOCINENTATION INE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 9 OF 16 ATTACHMENT A - PART A

+

(TYPICAL)

I COMAICHE PEAK STEAM EIECTRIC STATICN i

1 IEEE 323-1974 EQUIPMENT QJALIFICATION

' 00CIMENTATICN REVIEW FORM

}

A. E03IPMENT/DOCLMENTATION IDENTIFICATION

1. SPECIFICATION 10. 2. VENIDR
3. APPLICABIE QUALIFICATICN DOCtRENTS:

r

STATUS TRANSMIITAL DOCLMENT (AEN, APP) (NUMBER & DATE)

(a)

(b) -

k (c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h) -

4. EQUIPMENP/FINCTION (per specification):
5. QUALIFICATION MET 110D(S)

REVIEWER DATE Form: ITE-DC-15.1 January 1984

  • I

'IUGCO NUCEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE PREPARATION OF EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DOCINENTATION 'INE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 10 OF 16 ATTAO NENT A - PARP B (TYPICAL)

SPEC.

B. QUALIFICATION GECKLIST DOC /PAGE REF YES to N/A 1. DOES DOCIEENTATION ADDRESS ALL EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED?

YES to N/A 2. DOES DOCINENTATION ADDRESS CPSES SPECIFIC 1%PAMETERS?

YES 10 N/A 2a. ID NORMAL PARAMETERS FOR QUALIFIED LIFE. AND AGING ENVEIOP CPSES FORMAL PARAMETERS?

YES FD N/A 2b. DO ABbORMAL/ ACCIDENT PARAMEIERS USED IN QUALIFICATION ENVEIOP CPSES AB!ORMAL/ ACCIDENT PARAMETERS?

YES 10 N/A 3. IS DOCINENTATIN AUDITABM AND I

TRACEABIE 'IO CPSES EQUIINENr?

YES NO N/A 4. IS QUALIFIED LIFE EXPLICITLY STATED?

YES 10 N/A 4a. ID AGING RESULTS SUPPORT 'IEE QUALIFIED LIFE?

YES PO N/A 5. DOES QUALIFICATION MEIEOD(S) CONEORM WrHI IEEE STD. 323-1974?

YES FO N/A Sa. DOES 'IEST SEQUEICE (DNFORM '10 IEEE STD. 323-1974?

YES to N/A 6. ARE FAILURE CRITERIA EOR 'IESTS TFINED?

~YES NO N/A 7. IF THE EQUIIMENT WOUID BE EXIOSED 'IO DBA, NAS QJALIFICATION BY TYPE 'IEST?

YES to N/A 8. DOES DEMONSTRATED OPERABILITY ENVEIOP CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

YES FO N/A 8a. DOES BON-DETRIMENIAL FAILURE Ebrm: 'INE-DC-15.1a January 1984

'IUGCO 20 CLEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE PREPARATION OF EQUIPMENT 00ALIFICATION DOCLNENTATION TNE-DC-15 '3 5-10-84 11 OF 16 ATTACHMENT A - PARP B cont.

(TYPICAL)

SPEC.

B. QUALIFICATION GECKLIST [DC/PAGE REF YES BO N/A 9. ARE MARGDB DEFINED?

YES tO N/A 9a. DO MARGDE MEET CR EXCEED IEEE STD. 323-1974?

YES PD N/A 10. ARE INSTALIATION AND t00NTING .

INTERFACES, AS REQUIRED FOR QUALIFICATION, SPECIFIED?

YES 10 N/A 11. ARE MAINTENANCE REQUIRD4ENTS AND COMPONENT REPUCEMENT INTERVAIS SPECIFIED?

12. AGING MEmODOIDGY YES 10 N/A 12a. WAS ARRHmIUS MEIHODOIDGY USED IN AGING PER NUREG 0588?

YES PO N/A 12b. ARE THERMAL AGDG PARMETERS JUSTIFIED?

YES NO N/A 12c. WAS THE TEMPEPATURE USED FOR ACCEIERATED 'IHERMAL AGING VERIFIED 'IO BE LESS THAN TEMPERA'IURG AT WHICH ENOWN MATERIAL PHASE CHANGES OOCUR PER NUREG 0588?

YES BO N/A 12d. WAS MECHANICAL AGING JUSTIFIED (CY-CLIC wry REQUIREMENIS SPECIFIED)?

YES NO N/A 12e. i. DOES RADIATION AGDG ENVEIDP CPSES REQUIREMENTS?

YES NO N/A 12e, ii. WAS COBALT 60 USED FOR THE RADIATION SOURCE?

YES NO N/A 12f. HAVE KNOWN SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS BEEN CONSIDERED PER NUREG 0588?

Form: 'INE-DC-15.16 .

January 1964 r

s.

.w.,

J

'IUGCO 10CIEAR EN3INEERING PPOCEDURE REVISION ISSUS PAGE CPSES DA'IE PREPARATION OF ECUIPMENT GUALIFICATION DOCLMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 12 OF 16 ATTAONENT A - PARP B cont.

(TYPICAL)

CIECKLIST REMARKS i

r I.

i 1

l l

j. Ebrm: 'INE-DC-15. Ic l

January 1984 L

o-

'IUGOO NUCEAR ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAE CPSES DATE PREPARATION OF EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION 00CLMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 13 OF 16 ATTACHMENT A - PARP C (TYPICAL)

C. QUALIFICATION CONPINGENCIES DOC /PAGE REF.

1. MAINTERNCE INTERVALS
2. REPLACFRENT B7FERVAIS
3. S"IORA G REQUIREMENTS
4. INSTALLL" ION REQUIREMENTS
5. MOUNTHKi REQUIREMENTS Form: 'INE-OC-15.1d January 1984

- ~

)

'IUGOO NUCEAR ENGINEERING hwdRE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE PREPARATION OF ECUIIMENT QUALIFICATION 00CIMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 14 OF 16 ATTY.HMENT A - PARP D (TYPICAL)

D. REMARKS REVIEWER DATE Ebrm: 'INE-OC-15. le .

January 1984

. -

  • 8,

-)

'IUGCO NUCLEAR ENGINEERING PROCDJRE REVISION ISSUE PAGE CPSES DATE PREPARATION OF EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION COCLMENTATION 'INE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 15 T 16 ATTACHMENT A - PARP E (TYPICAL)

E. ENVIRON 4 ENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

DATA T

Form: 'INE-DC-15.1 f January 1984

_)

'IUGCO MX2 EAR DIGINEERING PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PME CPSES IRTE PREPARATION OF BQUIPMENT CUALIFICATION DOCtNENTATION TNE-DC-15 3 5-10-84 16 OF 16 FIGURE 1 (TYPICAL)

RECORM TRANSMIT ML FORM

'IO: Date:

, Records Supervisor FROM: -

Title / Signature

'lhe attached records are hereby transmitted to you for: ,

Retention Microfilming - Return to Satellite File Name/ Location IDENTIFIER DME OR SEQUENCE NO. TITLE

1. Previous Iocation:
2. Designated Iocation:
3. Records Received and Filed:

Iocation:

By: Date:

Signature i

e Form: 'INE-DC-15. 2 April 1984

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20206N654&oldid=3055793"