ML20207A599

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:16, 27 December 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That 45 Actions Listed in Recipient 870414 Memo to Chairman Appropriate & Sufficient to Resolve 34 Issues Raised in Ofc of Inspector & Auditor Rept 86-10,per Chairman 870512 Request for Review of Category 1 Recommendations
ML20207A599
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 08/25/1987
From: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To: Stello V
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML20206E778 List:
References
FOIA-88-322 NUDOCS 8708270295
Download: ML20207A599 (2)


Text

.__.

, e.

! UNITED STATES

\o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g I W ASHING TON, D. C. 20SH k,..... August 25, 1987 MEMORANDUM FOR: Victor Stello, Jr. .

Executive Director for Operations FROM: James G. Keppler, Director Office of Special Projects

SUBJECT:

CPRRG RECOMMENDATIONS In response to the Chainnan's May 12, 1987 memorandum, we have reviewed all of your Category I recomendations and related aspects of the Comanche Peak Report Review Group (CPRRG) recomendations as specified in your April 14, 1987 memorandum to the Chainnan. Enclosure 1 to your memorandum identified 45 recomended actions specifically related to the licensing and inspection activities for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station. We agree that these actions are appropriate and sufficient to resolve the 34 issues raised in the OIA Report 86-10. Moreover, we believe that these actions are straightforward and can be accomplished by the Comanche Peak Project Division separately from the Category 2 and 3 programmatic recomendations assigned to NRR and ARM.

We have also reviewed the CPRRG report, as required by item 2 of the Chainnan's rnemoranovra, and conclude that there are no additional actions or lessons-learned beyond those identified in your April 14, 1987 memorandum. However, we will continually refer to the report to ensure that the intent of the recomendations is being fulfilleo and to reflect on this question.

Many of the assignments evolving from the CPRRG recomendations are closely related to other review and inspection activities being conducted by the Cornanche Peak Project Division. We believe it would be impractical and inefficio.t to attempt to resolve the CPRRG recomendations separate from these other activities. Rather, we intend to incorporate the CPRRG recommendations into our related technical review and inspection activities and will report their resolution separately prior to licensing.

%s.Ya ktff e7 James G. Keppler, Director Office of Special Projects cc: J. Taylor '

T. Reha T. Murley W. Mcdonald R. Martin C. Grimes g qo m ] Y ~$I

/ . i

I August 25, 1987 DISTRIBijTION:

DocketFile(50-445/446)

^h -

OSPReading(87-112)

(87112) gi W CPPDReading(E00-870090)

EDO Reading 3

Y J

SConnelly OlA b, ^^;

OO4 JKeppler/JAAxel)d PFMcKee HSchierling JLyons RWarnick AVietti. Cook CPPD.LA hN 8Tompkins (87 112) 4.I 4 g g on P 'J j v ,

i t

i i

T liemo to VStello from JGKeppler dtd 8/25/87 re: CPRRG Recommendations n

s0 :D/ li :EPPQ :0IR:GPP r:DT I :05F iDIR:05P-  :  :

.....:. , i.% pt .....:....... ,4 .:. .f(.....:.. g .......:..............:..............

WE :P ,.4 Kee :CIGrimes: sam g x ffad :JGKebpler  :  :

.....:..- ............:.............'.. :8/.K/87

8/1f87  :

\TE :8M/87 :80Y/87  :