ML20206E871

Informs That EDO Assumed Responsibility for Three Actions on 766 Sys Recommended in Comanche Peak Rept

ML20206E871
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	06/17/1988
From:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20206E778	List: IA-88-322, Submits Input to Plan for Implementing Recommendations from Facility Rept Review Group Project Rept.Definitive & Documented Regulatory Position Does Not Exist on Controls During Transfer Between Organizations Re Shipping Records ML20206E774 ML20206E780 ML20206E784 ML20206E790 ML20206E825 ML20206E858 ML20206E871 ML20206E887 ML20206E900 ML20207A599 ML20207A604 ML20207A645 ML20207A670 ML20207A676 ML20207A681 ML20207A693
References
FOIA-88-322 NUDOCS 8811180223
Download: ML20206E871 (3)

Text

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

e

..,%. UNITED STATES

[d,...

M} NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4 I wasHiNotoN. o c. 2 cess

..... 4,

. orner or // dP /7 "unWA^a a In March 1988 the EDO assumed responsibility for the 3 actions on the 766 system recommended

in the Coc:=anche PeakReport. These are recom- a sendations #54, 76, 77. The EDO effort on this is being led by Tom Martin, Chief of the Regional ,

Operations Staff. All the regional offices, NRR, i hMSS, OE, OSP and ARM are participating in reviewing A0)(D4 and further refining tMe proposal. The goal is to have (first phase of) a new system in place by January 1989.

s

.6L.w.., .......s ._.

=

l t

l 881k100223 001108

• PDR FOIA s CONDITOO-322 PDR

_ ____.m.- . _ _ . . _ , _ - _ . , . _ _ _ _ . _. _ -

'** UNIT tD $T ATE 5

" *g NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION e ,

waswiNotow.o.c.acsss j ' '

'ty .

/

o...*

'7/2/IY .

6 7 ,o n o Net- TICHET Hot OPIG. DUC DA1E t DOC DATEt 10/05/07

0Mt. VJ C10k 0101.1.0. JR . 10 / t.e / A 7 HRR FCVD DATCt 31 CHAIAHAN ZCC6 ra Y CI.I.0W

• s

)R SIGNATURE Or1 T. C. MU.tLEY t

CCI Utt HURLEY/SNTEICl!

3MPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS PURSUANT MIRAGLIA STAPOSTECHI F:L AH A 100007 IFEFRED 101 PMAS SNIEIEH/ R t O P.t{, b HOSCF:URG CONTACT 1 ACTION (Lee 38Xne.m

.n n ' e m s TOR Action.

1. E*MMM M 19TT ,84 AS$$NID To ri c h . BY /7 "  ; p'k

\

~

' ' c-}g.

k 49,-11 y@# f fe Yt '

e& $n. .

pyg

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AQ t. / &

N k REVISION OF YELLOW IT TIP h L ' DATES HAY BE MADE. WITH ON, THRU THE WEEHLY WITS J

CEC 'O ONE WEEK AFTER ASSIGN-W /PA/u f Cut -f  ! MAIL ROOM. THE WEN DUE DE j ' PROVED DY NRR MAILR00Me OR1 *- !D TO TRACK DIVISION COR-MD!

/A4/.

%l.ICOMPLETIONSCHEDUL DIRECTORS OFFICE g . p  ;;;;;-----------

q x\g s

o 3-ESTIMATED COMPLET10N DATE CATEGORY 11 REC 0WENDATIONS '

REGIONAL ASSESSMENT OFFICE ,

1Di ACTION Improve regional assessment function NRR

"" N-M 75

• to require more frequent and timely in depth evaluations of the region's plant inspection perfomance and documentation practices.

Decer.ber 1988 766 3YSTEM OFFICE 3 ltf ACTION NRR/ ARM 54 Develop a more comprehensive, unified ~'

766 System that meets current agency needs. Consider the monitoring of site - 3W^c M specific inspection prefirams, periodic regional monitoring of ' nspection E@

program status, and headquarters over- ,.

ngp view.

Istiblish inspection and enforcement NRR/ ARM """"~ k PJME

/ 76 ,

' data qualit;' assurance' policies and ] g )f&&

procedures as well as a training program to help assure a consistent, re11able, and timely agency data source.

N Consider collecting all inspection and NRR/ ARM -

77 enforcement staff resourse data in RITS. Evaluate the benefits of co'l-7M Iib 6#

1ecting inspection inforwtton by l

SALP functional area rather by inspec-tion module.

f

,.