ML20206E871
| ML20206E871 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 06/17/1988 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206E778 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-88-322 NUDOCS 8811180223 | |
| Download: ML20206E871 (3) | |
Text
- - - - - - - -
e
[d,...
UNITED STATES M}
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4 I wasHiNotoN. o c. 2 cess 4,
orner or
//
dP /7 "unWA^a a In March 1988 the EDO assumed responsibility for the 3 actions on the 766 system recommended in the Coc:=anche PeakReport. These are recom-a sendations #54, 76, 77. The EDO effort on this is being led by Tom Martin, Chief of the Regional Operations Staff. All the regional offices, NRR, i
hMSS, OE, OSP and ARM are participating in reviewing A0)(D4 and further refining tMe proposal. The goal is to have (first phase of) a new system in place by January 1989.
s
.6L.w..,
.......s l
=
t l
881k100223 001108 PDR FOIA CONDITOO-322 PDR s
____.m.-
UNIT tD $T ATE 5
" *g NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION waswiNotow.o.c.acsss e
j
/
't y o...*
'7/2/IY OPIG. DUC DA1E t Net-TICHET Hot 6 7,o n o
- 0Mt. VJ C10k 0101.1.0. JR.
DOC DATEt 10/05/07 HRR FCVD DATCt 10 / t.e / A 7 31 CHAIAHAN ZCC6 ra Y CI.I.0W
- s
)R SIGNATURE Or1 T. C. MU.tLEY t
CCI HURLEY/SNTEICl!
Utt 3MPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS PURSUANT MIRAGLIA STAPOSTECHI F:L AH A PMAS 100007 HOSCF:URG IFEFRED 101 SNIEIEH/ R t O P.t{, b CONTACT 1 ACTION (Lee 38Xne.m
- E*MMM
.n n ' e m s TOR Action.
,84 AS$$NID To ri c h.
BY M 19TT
\\
c-}g.
p'k
/7
~
k 49,-11 Yt y@# f e& $n.
fe
/
AQ t.
pyg N
k REVISION OF YELLOW IT h
DATES HAY BE MADE. WITH TIP J
L ON, THRU THE WEEHLY WITS CEC
'O ONE WEEK AFTER ASSIGN-Cut
-f f
! MAIL ROOM. THE WEN DUE W /PA/u
' PROVED DY NRR MAILR00Me DE j
OR1
!D TO TRACK DIVISION COR-
%l.ICOMPLETIONSCHEDUL MD!
DIRECTORS OFFICE
/A4/.
p g
q x\\g s
o 3-ESTIMATED COMPLET10N DATE CATEGORY 11 REC 0WENDATIONS REGIONAL ASSESSMENT OFFICE 1Di ACTION
- "" N-M NRR Improve regional assessment function 75 to require more frequent and timely in depth evaluations of the region's plant inspection perfomance and documentation practices.
Decer.ber 1988 766 3YSTEM OFFICE 3
ltf ACTION Develop a more comprehensive, unified NRR/ ARM
~'
54 766 System that meets current agency Consider the monitoring of site
- 3W^c M needs.
specific inspection prefirams, periodic regional monitoring of ' nspection E@
program status, and headquarters over-ngp view.
Istiblish inspection and enforcement NRR/ ARM """"~
k PJME
/
76,
data qualit;' assurance' policies and
] g )f&&
procedures as well as a training program to help assure a consistent, re11able, and timely agency data source.
N Consider collecting all inspection and NRR/ ARM -
77 enforcement staff resourse data in 7M Iib 6 RITS. Evaluate the benefits of co'l-1ecting inspection inforwtton by SALP functional area rather by inspec-l tion module.
f
-