ML20154L515
| ML20154L515 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1985 |
| From: | BECHTEL GROUP, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20154L505 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8603110503 | |
| Download: ML20154L515 (55) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ . _ . ._ _ _ _ _ _ .__________.__________._._.m__..m_ . . _ _ _ . _ . .
1 4
i l
l l
f h
l OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT l
FORT CALHOUN STATION
' UNIT 1 i
t i
i i
REACTOR CONTAINMETE BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST i' '
FINAL REPORT f
4 i
l
\i 1
1 s
1 i,
1 Prepared by Bechtel Power Corporation l
San Francisco, CA
! November 1983 f
i
! SU-088b 8603110503 e60 g 5 PDR ADOCK O PDR ,
(%
TABLE OF C0KfEYr3 Page Sections 1
1.0 INIRODUCTION 2
2.0
SUMMARY
3 3.0 TEST SYNOPSIS 4
4.0 TEST DATA SU W RY 9
5.0 ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
6.0 REFERENCES
10 Appendices A. Description of Fort Calhoun ILRT Computer Program B. . Comparison of Fort Calhoun and Bechtel ILRT Computer Results C. Stabilization Sususary Date D. ILRT Summary Data and Mass Point Report E. Verification Summary Data.and Mass Point Report F. Plots - Stabilization + ILRT + Verification
- Air Mass
- Temperature
- Pressure
- Vapor Pressure
- ILRT
- Air Mass
- Mass Point Leakage Rate and UCL
- Bad Data Points (Temperature Sensors)
- Verification
- Air Mass
- Mass Point Leakage Rate G. ISG Calculation H. Local Leakage Race Test Results SU-088b 11
,m
\
1.0 INTRODUCTION
(G The reactor containment building Integrated Leakage Rate Test (Type A) is performed to demonstrate that leakage through the primary reactor containment and systems and components penetrating primary containment does not exceed the allowable leakage rate specified in tbc cort Calhoun Station Unit 1 Technical Specifications.
The successful periodic Type A and supplemental verification tests were performed according to the requirements of the Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1 Technical Specifications and 10CFR50, Appendix J. The Type A test method used is the absolute method described in ANSI /N45.4-1972, " Leakage Rate Testing of Containment Structures for Nuclear Reactors", and ANSI /ANS 55.8-1981, " Containment Systems Leakage Testing Requirements". The leakage rate was calculated using the mass point method formules f rom ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981.
The mass point analysis method calculates air mass at each time step as a function of absolute pressure and temperature. A linear regrassion analysis is used to calculate the rate of change of air mass with respect to time. The leakage rate is equal to the ratio of the rate of change of air mass to the initial air mass. A 95 percent upper confidence limit is calculated to assure a 95 percent pecbability that the calculated leakage rate is within the acceptance limits. Following the ILRT, the verifica-tion test leakage rate was calculated using the mass point method, fs C'
a lculations were done with OPPD's ILRT computer program describad in
('-') Appendix A. The calculated air mass, leakage rate and 95 percent upper confidence limit were verified against Bechtel Power Corporation's ILRT program. The calculated sir masses agreed within 1 lbm throughout the test. The calculated leakage rates and 95 percent upper confidence limits agreed within 0.001 %/ day after the first four to six data points. As expected, very early in the test larger differences occured due to the sensitivity of leakage rate to very small differences (1 lbm) in air mass. The results of the two programs are tabulated and compared in Appendix B.
(D I
\s ,/ SU-088b 1
-( 2.0
SUMMARY
This report presents data, analysis, and conclusions pertaining to the Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1 Integrated Leakage Rate Test .(ILRT) performed in October 1985. The ILRT was performed at the beginning of the 1985 refueling outage. Included in the report is a presentation of the Local Leakage Rate Test results required by the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, 10CFR50, Appendix J.
The ILRT was successfully performed from 1500 October 9 to 0100 October 10, 1985. This was followed by a successful verification (imposed leakage) test to assure satisfactory instrument performance. The follow-ing is a summary of test results expressed in weight percent per day:
Test Results Acceptance Criteria ILRT L,, 0.034 0.075 95% Upper Confidence Limit 0.043 0.C75
' Verification Le 0.137 0.109 to 0.159 A chronological summary of events, a summary of plant data, and a discussion of test results are included in subsequent portions of this report.
\m 4
k SU-088b 2
3.0 TEST SYNOPSIS Valve line-ups were conducted on all systems to establish post-accident con-ditions except for component cooling, hydrogen purge and three penetrations necessary to conduct the ILRT. The containment was tested in an "as found" condition. The inspection of the containment's accessible interior and ex-terior surfaces was conducted prior to pressurization. No evioence of struc-tural deterioration was noted which would have affected containment integrity or leak tightness.
Containment pressurization started at 1600 October 7, 1985, and test pressure of 60.0 psig was reached at 0545 on October 8. The pressurization line was vented. Containment coolers and fans were stopped at 0645. Following a four-hour stabilization period the ILRT was started at 1100 on October 8. A leak-age rate of 0.030%/ day was calculated during the 10-hour period from 1100 to 2100 on October 8. Following the ILRT a 3.7 scfm verification leak was im-posed. During the verification test an instrument air line was discovered to be connected to a test connection between the two isolation valves on penetra-tion M-40. The ILRT procedure called for attaching the instrument air line during depressurization to assist in opening the purge valves. The instru-ment air line was disconnected and penetration M-40 was tested for possible in-leakage. With a 90 .sig test pressure, which is equal to instrument air pressure, the in-leak 3e rate was measured at 2600 sccm. Since the leak test-ing equipment was calibrated at 60 psig, a correction factor equal to the square root of the pressure ratio was applied yielding an in-leakage rate of 3078 sccm or 0.003%/ day. Although the in-leakage rate was shown to be small, it was decided to repeat the ILRT with the instrument air disconnected, to
/' assure the validity of the test results.
O The verification flow was disconnected and the ILRT restarted at 1500 on October 9. 1985. The previous four hours from 1000 to 1500 were used to ver-ify that the temperature stabilization criteria was satisfied. The leakage rate for the 10-hour period fron 1500 on October 9 to 0100 on October 10 was 0.034%/ day with a 95 percent upper confidence limit of 0.043%/ day. The 95 percent upper confidence limit was less than the acceptance limit of 0.075%/
day.
The data points at 1545 and 2000 on October 9 were not used in the leakage rate calculations due to bad data points from temperature sensors 8 and 17.
These bad data points were singular occurrences as can be seen from the tem-perature plots for these sensors in Apr;endix F. No data point was obtained at 1845 on October 9 due to a data acquisition malfunction.
A verification flow of 3.7 scfm (0.1%/ day) was imposed at 0215 on October
- 10. Following a one-hour stabilization period, a four-hour verification test was performed from 0330 to 0730. The calculated verification test leakage rate of 0.13%/ day was within the acceptance range of 0.109%/ day to 0.159%/
day.
Containment depressurization commenced at 1220 October 10, 1985. Following depressurization determination was made that no measurable water level changes requiring corrections to the calculated leakage rates had occurred during the test.
O 3
4.0 TEST DATA
SUMMARY
A. Plant Information Owner: Omaha Public Power District Plant: Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 Location: Fort Calhoun, Nebraska Containment Type: Post-tensioned, PWR Date Test Completed: October 10, 1985 Docket Number: 50-285
- 5. Technical Data
- 1. ' Containment Net Free Air 1,050,000 cu. ft.
Volume
- 2. Design Pressure 60 psig
- 3. Design Temperature 305*F
- 4. Calculated Peak Accident 60 psig Pressure. F a
- 5. -Containment ILRT Average 60-110*F Temperature Limits C. Test Results - Type "A" Test Test Method ' Absolute
( ) 1.
- 2. Data Analysis Technique Mass Point per ANSI /ANS 56.9-1981
- 3. Test Pressure 60.0 peig + 1.0
- 0.0
- 4. Maximum Allowable Leakage 0.1%/ day ,
Race, L,
- 5. 75% of L, 0.075%/ day
- 6. Integrated Leakage Rate Test At 95% Upper Result From Regression Confidence Line, L.. Limit 0.034%/ day 0.0431/ day
- 7. Verification Test Imposed 3.7 scfm Leakage Race, L o 0.100%/ day
- 8. Verification Test Results From Regression Line, Le 0.137X/ day SU-088b 4
i O 9. Verification Test Limits Upper Limit 0.159%/ day
-(La+ Lam + 0.25 La )
Lower Limit 0.109%/ day (La + L,, - 0.25 L a)
- 10. Report Printouts The report printouts of the Type "A" and verification test calculations are provided for the mass point analysis in Appendices D and E. Stabilization data are also provided in Appendix C. Plots for the stabilization, ILRT, and verification test periods are provided in Appendix F.
D. Local Leakage Rate Test Results - Type "B" and "C" Tests
- 1. Results for Local Leakage Rate Tests performed since the previous (January,1983) ILRT are presented in Appendix H.
- 2. Leakage of penetrations not in post-LOCA lineup during this ILRT (Minimus Pathway Leakage)
Penetatration Description "As left" M-52 ILRT Presi,ure Sensing 330.0 SCCM l l
M-72 ILRT Pressurization / 300.0 SCCM Verification Flow M-18 Component Cooling 0.0 SCCM M-19 Component Cooling 0.0 SCCM M-11 Component Cooling 0.0 SCCM M-15 Component Cooling 140.0 SCCM M-39 Component cooling 90.0 SCCM M-53 Component Cooling 0.0 SCCM M-57 Hydrogen Pressure 0.0 SCCM M-58 Hydrogen Purge 0.0 SCCM M-30 Hydrogen Purge 0.0 SCCM SU-088b 5
() Penetatration M-69 Description Hydrogen Purge "As Left" 0.0 SCCM M-40 Temporary Instrument Air 0.0 SCCM Total 860.0 SCCM (0.001 %/ day)
E. Integrated Leakage Rate Measurement System The following instrumentation system was used:
No.
Required Description Date
- 1. Absoluta Pressure 2 Precision Pressure Gages Range: 0-100 psia Mensor Corporation Accuracy: 0.02% f.s.
Model 16721 Sensitivity: 0.001 psia Calibration: 8/6/85
- 2. Drybulb Temperature 30 RTD Range: 60-100*F 100 Ohm Platinum Accuracy: 0.10*F Hy-Cal engineering Sensitivity: 0.Ol*F Calibration: 6/20/85
- 3. Dewpoint Temperature 10 Lithium Chloride Range: 40-100*F Foxboro Corp. Accuracy: 1.0*F Model 2701 RG Sensitivity: 0.Ol*F Calibration: 7/1/85
- 4. Flow Meter 1 Rotometer Pange: 0-4 scfm Fischer and Porter Accuracy: 1% f.s.
SB 087615588 Calibration: 8/23/85
- 5. Display 1 Digitec Range: -400 to 400 Ohm Model 3000 Resolution: 0.01 Ohm Datalogger (0.05*F)
Repeatability: 0.01 ohn
! k SU-088b 6
4 l-t l !
{ 6. Overall Instrument Selection Guide (ISG) f' The calculation of the ISG per ANSI /ANS 56.8 1981 is provided in Appendix G.
l 7. Drybulb and Dewpoint Temperature Sensor Locations and' Volume j Fraction.
i j Sensor locations and volume fractions are provided in Table 1. ;
7 I
4 !
i
! r
! i 8 l 4
[
e i
r t
! r f
i
}
! i i
3 1 I e
f I
I
- SU-088b 7 a
d i
- 4 .
i i ,
,s TABLE 1 Drybulb and Dewpoint Temperature Sensor Location
, and Volume Fractions Elevation Azimuth Distance From Volume Sensor Feet Degree Center, Feet Fraction j
'RTD'S 1 1010 155 45 0.0163 2 1013 35 45 0.0163 3 1013 170 25 0.0265 4 1013 40 25 0.0286 5 1030 90 25 0.0235 6 1075 0 0 0.0405 7 1048 230 30 0.0405 8 1048 50 35 0.0405 9 1098 0 40 0.0512 10 1098 180 40 0.0512 11 1113 270 25 0.0512 12 1060 55 35 0.0405 13 1113 90 25 0.0512 i
14 1050 200 35 0.0265 15 1050 340 35 0.0286 16 1020 230 35 0.0235 17 1048 130 35 0.0405 18 1030 330 45 0.0235
- 19 1010 320 45 0.0163 20 1060 270 15 0.0405 0.0163 2
21 1000 90 45 22 1020 0 45 0.0235 23 1048 320 45 0.0405 24 1060 130 25 0.0405 25 1060 60 15 0.0405 26 1025 270 15 0.0405 l 27 1000 225 40 0.0163 28 1030 190 45 0.0235 29 1088 270 25 0.0405 30 1088 90' 25 0.0405 3
t DEWCELLS 1 998 90 45 0.1 2 1013 90 40 0.1
- 3 1045 50 35 0.1 4 1045 230 30 0.1 i 5 1095 270 45 0.1 6 1095 90 45 0.1 0.1 7 1060 55 25 8 1020 230 35 0.1 9 1060 130 35 0.1 10 1048 320 45 0.1 0 SU-088b 8
5.0 ANALYSIS AND. INTERPRETATION 0
s_ ,/ The calculated leakage rate at the 95% upper confidence limit is 0.043%/ day.
The minimum pathway local leakage rate for penetrations not in post-LOCA lineup is 0.001%/ day. The sum of the ILRT 95% upper confidence limit and the
- local leakage rates is 0.044%/ day. This "as left" leakage rate at the 95%
upper confidence limit is less than the acceptance limit of 0.075%/ day at 60.0 psig.
The containment was tested in an "as found" condition. Therefore, the "as found" 95% upper confidence leakage is equal to the 95% upper confidence i leakage measured during the ILRT, 0.044%/ day.- ,
Prior to the ILRT, the mechanical sleeves for penetrations M-49 and M-95 were found to'have bad test connections. The test connections were repaired and the sleeves were tested and found to have zero leakage.
O e
l 9
a
,-.- . ,m,. - - - -
..e-,,- , , - . , - , - ~ - - , , . . - . , ..,,,--,m, - - - , - , . . ,
. . -_ - . . - . ..._-.~ -.-~ _ -----.. ..--._--.- . _ _ . - . - . - - - . - - - - . _ -
5 I
f
6.0 REFERENCES
- 1. Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1 Technical Specification.
4 2. Surveillance Test Procedure ST-CONT-7, Revision 10.
- 3. 10CFR50, Appendix J, Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for ,
- l. Water Cooled Power Reactors. l
- 4. ANSI N45.4-1972 Leakage Rate Testing of Containment Structures l
t-for Nuclear Reactors.
i
! 5. ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, Containment Systes Leakage Testing i Requirements.
i 1
e
} !
I i i j r i 1 t
}
i i ,
i
?
4 0
i ,
i 2
1 1
i 4
4 1 4 l
l I
i i
SU-088b 10 i
] ,
i i !
I I 1
1
-,-.----.an--- , m v, ,_-v-en,-m.--- ---,-,n--
r
(
l t
I APPENDIX A ,
P Description of Fort Calhoun ILRT ;
Computer Program ,
i i
I l
l l
i 1
i l
I l h i
l SU-088b
. . - , , . . , - - - , . . . . - . - - . . - - - - - - . _ . - - , . - ~ - . _ _ - - - . . . . - . - - - .
O APPEbOIX A :
DISCRilmON OF OPPD ILRT CDMPUTER PROGRAM 1ho OPPD ILRT computer calculatas the lankage rata (sing the mass poirt method or / 56.8-1981. The air mass, M. at endi data poltt is calculated from the contalmiert free air wlume, absoluta , mighted average dq6ulb tempentwo and weighted awrage irt temperattre. The air mass equation is:
(Ia P33-I#gPv ) V g M=
RIyTgg whors, M = Calculated air mass, Ibm.
r Pg = Absoluta pressus sensor redings (2 sensors), psia Pvg = Vapor presaru cm yJing to dowpoint temperattri sensor medirgs (10 sensors), psia T3= Dn6ulb temperaturs readings (30 sensors), F ag= Pressure sensor whrne fractions (ag =a2= .5)
- 3= Despoltt Temperatwo sensor whrne fructions (SeeTable1) ,
y=
g ttsi sensor whsne fracuans 3
V = Corsatrvnant free air witrne ( i,050,000 ft )
R = Gas constart ( 53.35 ft -lbf / lbm )
O '
l
O l
A linear regneston analysis yields the followirt ngnension line for n r
datapoints.
E= A t + B 1
n (2t,M )-[2M ) (It ) 3 3 3 A= 2 t
n[Itg ) - ( 2 t )2 g (2M}(2t I ! }~(2tM)(2t}
! 1 1 B-n llig )-(2t g)
Mg= f51arintari air rnass at alapsed tarne tg h IGRf' age rate , Q, is enluttad at (Irne tn as:
2400 aEl l
6 = % at A
= - 2400 -
l i
l
- O ;
I - _ - - - _ _ - - - - - - _. .- __ _. -
O The lanimes rate at the 951 typer aodidanos limit, UC Is:
UC. = Q + 2400 to.95SA /B M
h.95*795
" I(W i- Ml l Ui n-Z '
S =
n (Itki-(It )
g g I
O R=Atg+B g
The fbilowirg apprudmation is used for 0t .95 2
1.6449 [ m21 + 3.5283 ( n-2 ) + 0.85602
'O.95 * ( n-2 )2 + 1.2209 ( ry2 ) - 1.5163 Attadied are computar of the mimlated R.RT and wrtftcattan tant lamings rutas as a d tirns.
O
UALLES FCA 'WAM' ' LAM' '95% UCL' FOR TIST PIRICO
) CATI 11-05-1985 N
TIME: 14 04 F:LE NAME- TILAT OTA TIME RECCR0 t WAM (13el Last%/CAft 45% LCLi%/OnY 0.00 1 401,369.2 N/A N/A 0.25 5 401,32S 3 0 77' N/A 0 50 9 401,353.6 0 18a 3 067 0 75 13 401,165.0- -QEJECTED DATA ?ET-
. 0 -) 17 401,349.0 0 351 0 526 1 23 al 401,355 4 0 C07 ) 230
. 50 25 401,346 8 0 015 0.150 75 2" 401 333 C 0 035 0 13o 2 00 33 401,339.5 0 039 0 115 2 25 37 401,952 5 C 022 0 004 3 50 41 401,326.3 0 040 0 004 2 'S 4" 401,318 4 0 056 0 104 3 03 49 401,327 0 0 057 0 097 3 25 53 401,361.8 C 032 3 075
- 31) 57 401,319 8 1 041 0 079 3 75 61 to.6',7,89?.7- -QEJECTED UATA SET-4 CO 35 601 332.8 0 037 0 37C 4 25 69 401,326.0 C- 938 3 See 4.50 73 401,355.7 0 025 0 053 g3 4 75 77 401,330 5 0 025 0 050 00 81 402,361.2- -EEJECTED DATA SET-('
5 25 65 411.317.4 ) C29 0.051 5 30 89 401,321 0 0 030 0 OSC 5 75 'l 401,308 1 0 034 3 353 6 C0 97 401,328 6 0 032 3 049 6 2* 101 401,338 7 0 028 0 043 e 50 105 401.292.4 0 034 0 149 e.75 1C9 401,324.4 0.032 0 346 7 00 113 401,301.7 0 034 3 148 7 25 117 401,309.7 0.235 ) 047 7 50 121 401,305 4 0 035 0 047 7 75 125 401,314 1 0 034 0 145 S CO 129 401,305.7 0 035 0 045 8.25 133 401,306.6 0 035 ) 044 6 50 137 401,337 4 0 031 0 041 8.75 141 401,302.2 0.031 0 041 9 30 145 401,325.5 0 029 0 038 9 2* 149 401,295,0 0 430 0 039 9.50 153 401,308.7 0 030 0 038 9 75 157 401,257.1 3.034 0 043 10 00 161 401,292.8 0.034 0 043
\v/
I VALUES FOR 'WAM' '
LAM' '95% JCL ' FCA TEST PIAI'JD DATE 11-05-1985 TIME. 14 02 FILE NAME: VILAT.0TA TIME CEC 0A0 6 WAM (1bs) Last%/ DAY) 95% UCLt%/34Y) 0 00 ; 401,263.3 N/A N/A 0.25 5 401,297.3 -1 692 N/A 0.50 9 401,274.5 -o 074 2 177 0 75 13 401,233.2 0 306 009 1 00 17 401,269 9 0 144 0 374 1 25 21 401,268 7 0 033 0 349 1 53 23 401 232.1 C 14e 0.337 1.75 29 401,245 0 0.134 0 2'2 2 00 33 401,245 1 0 119 0 225 2.25 37 401,218.0 3 146 C 227 2 50 41 401,176.4 0 191 0 279 2.15 45 401,250.1 0 145 0 232 3 00 49 401,216.1 0 134 C.212 3.25 53 401,214.? O 132 0.115 3 50 57 401,206 0 0 130 0 164 3 75 61 401,20s.3 0 125 0 172 4 00 65 401.17) 7 0 136 0.179 i
r o
-M-- m-ewr- -
4 ,e., ,,-p,- ew+-z -,w,.. -. .m-----w, , , - - - , - - - , . - % . .-- - . - . - - . , . . . _ , , . - - - , , - w ,---w
O 1
l APPENDIX B l
l l Comparison of Fort Calhoun and l
Bechtel ILRT Computer Results O '
l 1
SU-088b
COMPARISON OF FORT CALHOUN AND BECHTEL COMPUTER PROGRAM CALCULATED AIR MASS, LEAKAGE RATE AND 952 UCL Air Nase (Ibe.) Leekage Rate (2/ day) 95k UCL (k/ day)
Date Fort Tott Fort Point Calhoun Bechtel d Calhoun Bechtel d Calhoun Bechtel d ILRT 1 401369 401370 1 2 401328 401329 1 .977 3 401354 401354 0 .186 3.067 4 401349 401349 0 .051 .053 .002 .526 .530 .004 5 401355 401356 1 .007 .007 .000 .234 .23e .000 6 401347 401347 0 .015 .016 .001 .154 .154 .000 7 401338 401334 0 .035 .03S .000 .136 .137 .001 8 401340 401340 0 .039 .039 .000 .115 .115 .000 9 401353 401353 0 .022 023 .001 .044 .006 .001 10 401327 401327 0 .040 .041 .001 .094 .095 .001 11 401318 401319 1 .056 .057 .001 .104 .106 .001 12 401328 401328 0 .057 .054 .001 .097 .098 .001 13 401362 401362 0 .032 .033 .001 .075 .076 .001 14 401320 401320 0 .041 .041 .000 .079 .040 .001 15 401333 401333 0 .037 .034 .001 .070 .071 .001 16 401326 401327 1 .034 .034 .000 .066 .064 .000 17 401356 401356 0 .025 .025 .000 .053 .053 .000 18 401331 401331 0 .025 .025 .000 .050 .050 .000 19 401317 401318 1 .029 .029 .000 .051 .051 .000 20 401321 401321 0 .030 .031 .001 .050 .050 .000 21 401304 401309 1 .034 .035 .001 .053 .053 .000 22 401329 401329 0 .032 .032 .000 .049 .049 .000 23 401339 401339 0 .028 .028 .000 .043 .043 .000 24 401292 401293 1 .034 .034 .000 .C49 .049 .000 25 401324 401325 1 .032 .032 .000 .044 .046 .000 26 401302 401302 0 .034 .034 .000 .044 .044 .000 27 401310 401310 0 .035 .035 .000 .047 .047 .000 28 401306 401305 0 .035 .036 .001 .047 .047 .000 29 401314 401314 0 .034 .03S .001 .045 .046 .001 l 30 401306 @1306 0 .035 .035 .ooo .o45 .o45 .ooo i 31 401307 401307 0 .035 .035 .000 .044 .045 .001 32 401337 401337 0 .031 .031 .000 .041 .041 .000 33 401302 401302 0 .031 .032 .001 .041 .041 .000 34 401326 401326 0 .029 .029 .000 .038 .034 .000 35 401295 401295 0 .030 .031 .001 .039 .039 .000 36 401309 401309 0 .030 .030 .000 .034 .034 .000 37 401257 401257 0 .034 .034 .000 .043 .043 .000 38 401293 401293 0 .034 .034 .000 .043 .043 .000 0
O Air Nees (1he.) Leekage Rete (*/ day)
Data Fort Fort Point Calhoum Bechtel d Calhoun Bechtel d Verification 1 401264 401269 1 2 401297 401297 0 .692 3 401275 401275 0 .074 4 401233 401234 1 .306 .307 .001 5 401270 401270 0 .146 .14e .002 6 401269 401269 0 .083 .045 .002 7 401232 401232 0 .146 .147 .001
'a 401245 401245 0 .134 .134 .000 9 401245 401245 0 .119 .120 .001
- 10 401218 401218 0 .141 .141 .000 11 401176 401177 1 .191 .192 .001 12 401250 401251 1 .145 .145 .000 13 401216 -401216 0 .139 .140 .001 14 401215 401215 0 .132 .133 .001 15 401206 401206 0 .130 .130 .000 16 401207 401207 0 .125 .126 .001 17 401171 401171 0 .136 .137 .001 O
.l I
l t
O
. i 1
i i
1 a
APPENDIX C ,
Stabilization Summary Data l
i e
i 4
{
I i
i l'
SU-088b i
l l
{ - . _ - __. --____,
FORT CALHOUN ILRT TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION FROM A 11 TARTING TIME AND DATE OF: 1030 1009 1985 TIME TEMP ANSI (HOURS) < R) AVE T AVE T DIFF (4 HRS) (1HR)
.00 529.87
.25 529.88
.50 529.88
.75 529.87 1.00 529.90 1.25 529.87 1.50 529.46 1.75 529.92 2.00 529.89 2.25 529.89 2.50 529.92 2.75 529.89 3.00 529.86 3.25 529.89 3.50 529.89 3.75 529.89 4.00 529.94 .015 .071 .06 O
- INDICATES TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION HA5 BEEN SATISFIED
- O e
~+ ~--,---------n, -,, .,_,,,,, , - _ _ _ _ , __ _ , , _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ , _ _ __
i i
i i
i i
APPENDIX D ILRT Summaary Data and Mass Point Report SU-088b
s 1 FORT CALHOUN ILRT
SUMMARY
DATA i
TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 1500 1009 529.493 75.0437 .1697 1050000.
> 1515 1009 529.930 75.0414 .1715 1050000.
1050000. !
1530 1009 529.912 75.0436 .1703 1600 1009 529.907 75.0420 .1709 1050000.
1615 1009 529.911 75.0438 .1702 1050000.
1630 1009 529.909 75.0419 .1726 1050000.
1645 1009 529.928 75.0429 .1716 1050000.
1700 1009 529.927 75.0430 .1709 1050000.
1715 1009 529.912 75.0434 .1701 1050000.
i 1730 1009 529.922 75.0400 .1735 1050000.
1745 1009 529.945 75.0416 .1713 1050000.
1800 1009 529.930 75.0412 .1712 1050000.
1815 1009 529.898 75.0431 .1694 1050000.
1830 1009 529.938 75.0409 .1711 1050000.
1900 1009 529.939 75.0435 .1649 1050000.
{ 1915 1009 529.925 75.0402 .1717 1050000.
1930 1009 529.498 75.0420 .1700 1050000.
1945 1009 529.934 75.0423 .1696 1050000.
! 2015 1009 529.935 75.0401 .1704 1050000.
2030 1009 529.931 75.0402 .1703 1050000.
l 2045 1009 529.947 75.0401 .1704 1050000.
2100 1009 529.915 75.0393 .1711 1050000.
2115 1009 529.495 75.0344 .1720 1050000.
2130 1009 529.955 75.0342 .1718 1050000.
2145 1009 529.917 75.0344 .1701 1050000.
2200 1009 529.940 75.0378 .1706 1050000.
2215 1009 529.922 75.0367 .1712 1050000.
I 2230 1009 529.941 75.0386 .1700 1050000.
2245 1009 529.924 75.0379 .1700 1050000.
, 2300 1009 529.929 75.0369 .1710 1050000.
2315 1009 529.922 75.0361 .170s 1050000.
- 2330 1009 529.840 75.0359 .1715 1050000.
I 2345 1009 529.917 75.0346 .1718 1050000, i
0 1010 529.496 75.0359 .1710 1050000.
i 15 1010 529.924 75.0343 .1721 1050000.
f 30 1010 529.922 75.0365 .1694 1050000.
45 1010 529.958 75.0320 .1729 1050000.
100 1010 529.919 75.0331 .1718 1050000.
l l
l l
I I
O FORT CALHOUN ILRT LEANAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCEMT/ DAY)
MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AMD DATE AT START OF TEST 3 1500 1009 1985 TEST DURATION 3 10.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTNT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R) (PSIA) MASS (LBM) (LBM) LOSS (LBM/HR) 1500 529.893 75.0437 401370.
1515 529.930 75.0414 401329. 40.6 162.4
- 1530 529.912 75.0436 401354. -25.0 31.2 l 1600 529.907 75.0420 401349. 4.7 20.3 1615 529.911 75.0434 401356. -6.6 11.0 1630 529.909 75.0419 401347. 8.6 14.9 1645 529.928 75.0429 401338. 9.0 17.9 1700 529.927 75.0430 401340. -1.5 14.9 1715 529.912 75.0434 401353. -13.0 7.5 1730 529.922 75.0400 401327. 26.1 17.1 1745 529.945 75.0416 401319. 8.0 18.5 1800 529.930 75.0412 401328. -9.3 13.8 1815 529.898 75.0431 401362. -34.0 2.3 1830 529.934 75.0409 401320. 41.9 14.1 1900 529.939 75.0435 401333. -13.0 9.1 I 1915 529.925 75.0402 401327. 6.6 10.1 0 1930 529.898 1945 2015 529.934 529.935 75.0420 75.0423 75.0401 401356.
401331.
401318.
-29.7 25.4 13.1 3 .' O S.2 9.9 2030 529.931 75.0402 401321. -3.6 8.8 2045 529.947 75.0401 401309. 12.7 10.6 2100 529.915 75.0393 401329. -20.3 6.8 2115 529.895 75.0344 401339. -10.3 4.9 2130 529.955 75.0342 401293. 46.3 11.8 2145 529.917 75.0344 401325. -31.9 6.6 2200 529.940 75.0378 401302. 22.9 9.7 2215 529.922 75.0367 401310. -8.0 8.2 2230 529.941 75.0386 401305. 4.6 4.6 l
2245 529.924 75.0379 401314. -8.9 7.2 2300 529.929 75.0369 401306. S.a 8.0
( 2315 529.922 75.0361 401307. -1.0 7.7 2330 529.440 75.0359 401337. -30.a 3.8 l 2345 529.917 75.0346 401302. 35.0 7.7 l 0 529.896 75.0359 401326. -23.3 4.9 15 529.924 75.0343 401295. 30.3 8.0 30 529.922 75.0365 401309. -13.6 6.4 45 529.954 75.0320 401257. 51.7 11.5 j 100 529.919 75.0331 401293. -35.8 7.7 l
l FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.) =1050000 REGRESSION LINE INTERCEPT (LBM) = 401354.
! SLOPE (LBM/NR) = -5.4 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LIANAGE MATE = .100 754 OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE = .075 THE UPPER 95m CONFIDENCE LIMIT = .043 THE CALCULATED LEAMAGE RATE = .034 i
I L
1 l
i l
I APPENDIX E Verification Summary Data and Mass Point Report !
l l
i e
l t
I l
l l
SU-088b I
Cl FORT CALHOUM ILRT
SUMMARY
DATA TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 330 1010 529.991 75.0344 . 1722 1050000.
345 1010 529.978 75.0423 . 1729 1050000.
400 1010 529.946 75.0393 . 1701 1050000.
415 1010 530.010 75.0349 . 1730 1050000.
430 1010 529.979 75.0373 . 1701 1050000.
445 1010 529.959 75.0343 . 1716 1050000.
500 1010 529.998 75.0330 . 1719 1050000.
515 1010 529.981 75.0330 . 1706 1050000.
530 1010 529.977 75.0324 . 1700 1050000.
545 1010 529.988 75.0249 . 1717 1050000.
600 1010 530.037 75.0280 . 1706 1050000.
615 1010 529.934 75.0273 . 1701 1050000.
630 1010 529.959 75.0244 . 1720 1050000.
645 1010 529.958 75.0242 . 1702 1050000.
700 1010 529.940 75.0199 . 1722 1050000.
715 1010 529.953 75.0219 . 1700 1050000.
730 1010 529.964 75.0167 . 1722 1050000.
O O
. ,m._,_ .,__ ,_-,.,_m._y_.n..,_-__.___._.,____..,__...__ - , . , _ _ _ _ _ ,______,___,-_________,.____,%.___., ,_. ,- c_ _ _ _ - _ . _ __
' FORT CALHOUN ILRT
('~~3, LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 330 1010 1985 TEST DURATION: 4.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MAS 5 LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R) (PSIA) MASS (LBM) (LBM) LOSS (LBM/HR) 330 529.991 75.0388 401269.
345 529.978 75.0423 401297. -28.7 -114.7 400 529.986 75.0393 401275. 22.4 -12.6 415 530.010 75.0349 401234. 41.5 47.0 430 529.979 75.0373 401270. -36.3 -1.0 445 529.959 75.0343 401269. 1.0 .0 500 529.998 75.0330 401232. 36.5 24.3 515 529.981 75.0330 401245. -13.1 13.4 530 529.977 75.0324 401245. .2 11.8 545 529.988 75.0289 401218. 26.9 22.5 600 530.037 75.0280 401177. 41.6 36.9 615 529.934 75.0273 401251. -74.0 6.6 630 529.959 75.0244 401216. 34.3 17.5 645 529.958 75.0242 401215. 1.1 16.5 700 529.940 75.0199 401206. 9.1 17.9 715 529.953 75.0219 401207. .8 16.5 730 529.964 75.0167 401171. 35.8 24.4 FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.) =1050000.
REGRESSION LINE INTERCEPT (LBM) = 401281.
SLOPE (LBM/HR) = -22.8 VERIFICATION TEST LEAXAGE RATE UPPER LIMIT = .159 VERIFICATION TEST LEAMAGE RATE LOWER LIMIT = .109 THE CALCULATED LEAMAGE RATE = .137 l
l O
i 4
i i
I i
i i
i
+
.i APPENDIX F 4
l PLOIS i
- Stabilization & ILRT & Verification
- Air Mass j - Temperature j - Pressure
- - Vapor Pressure i.
1 i
I e
t i
l i
+
1 i SU-088b -
l i
I f i !
L
FORT CALHOUN ILRT AIRMASS LBM X 1999 491.45 1S t abil- Verifi- l izatior cation 491.39 I
N,l-(.kj'1,p,v,'JV(,j,,,,
491.33 .
. Ii ,
's ,' ,1
.75 La - !l Y'[ 8
s.
491.27 V IO
.'~
's,,,,
s
- /b,li i, 4
491.21 ' stabiti- ttar ~
i l,1 I
. zaeton s (,,
491.15 . . ... . . . . .
1198 1999 730 1919 O
FORT CALHOUN ILRT TEMPERATURE DEGREES F 79.599 79.499
' ',,sJ'\ f.. I, l
70.399 / 'd gj jip_./['/"',/~\.,W^i,,.f",5/
79.200 4 ,
79.199 79.999 . . . ........ . . ..
O llee 1989 730 1919 -
FORT CALHOUN ILRT O '
PRESSURE PSIA (DRY AIR) 75.969 75.959 vN%V- A .
w, ,3 75.949 Y,/, ,r.'/ . i \ , V i, le 7 75.939 l
- \e.,
'1 75.929
" I, 75.919 . . . . . . . . . ........
lies 1999 730 1910 O
FORT CALHOUN ILRT UAPOR PRESSURE PSIA
.299
.190
.189
- 'g M **N 4 Opp ' h.. # v l
.160
.159 ........
O
. 11189 1999 730 leie
O FLOIS
- ILRT
- Air Mass
- Mass Point Leakage Rate and UCL
- Bad Data Points (Temperature Sensors)
SU-088b
O roar cataous itar AIRMASS LBM X 1999 491.49 Regression Line 491.36 N / g
~
'\ l$
.M 491.32
-bi ' /
13s w_\ l,'s
.,y Q v1, .i
' .73 ta - / ~. Ii' ,
491.28 I,l!
,~
401.24 ..
491.29 . . . . . .
1500 1999 les leie
'O FORT CALHOUN ILRT MASS POINT LEAXAGE RATE AND UCL 'X/ DAY
.259 I
1 L cct.
.200 l
.150 ,
\.,
.100
\['\ t. ._ y
- .75 La
.959
/g ,.., ,/),__ ~^v -
l , g sj - _-
,m ,, t xas naca O
1599 1999 les leie
FORT CALHOUN ILRT TEMPERATURE SENSOR 8 DEGREES F 76.999 Bad Data Point 74.999 72.999 70.999
- ~~~ ~ < . ~~~._ .__. .., ,_,
68.999 66.999 . . .
les leie 1500 1999
- O FORT CALHOUN ILRT TEMPERATURE SENSOR 17 DEGREES F 75.999 69.999 45.999 39.999 Bad Data Point j
15.990
.999 .
1500 1999 les leis 1
l t
I I
1 i
4 i
- l 1
I l I 1
i f
1 1
i I
i i
1 I
t I I !
l PLOTS [
i f
' - Verification i - Air Mass i
- Mass Point Leakage Rate l ,
h j i t
l
) !
! l i
i
- 6 i
4 i i i ,
- i 1
1, I
I r
~
1 !
l*
i l l !
I SU-088b i
! l 4
i l
j
FORT CALHOUN ILRT (verification)
) AIRMASS LBM X 1000 401.30 ,\ ,/
/
401.27 .@c. [ '..,
-4.f 7- upper timit*
Regression Line
\.,
\ -Q .y -& . . ,,
v.
401.24 C'r
\. .:: -A. .T
/,
\
. i r. . -
1**
.....f Lower Limit *
..'..~~~ .. ...
. p ~~ ~ .~~
401.21 5., ..'
i
',..,j
,l'
, .....y...
401.18 -\
- Limit on Regrcssior Line 401.15 ,
330 1910 730 1910 FORT CALHOUN ILRT (verification)
MASS POINT LEAKAGE RATE '2/ DAY
.599
.400
/\ '.
' upper Limt-*
.299 \. j.s
\. ,/* .,, f ' ~~ _f.
f
- Lower Limit *
- Limit on Leakage Rate
.999 . .
( 339 leie 730 leis
O I
I i
l i
t i
i t
b APPENDIX G ISG Calculation j l.
O l i
e h
}
a t I
f I
i i-3 l
4 l
1 t I
l 9 SU-088b i
1 i
l f
i e
b
' ~ ~ "
- ISG CALCULATION
\m,/ ( ANSI /ANS 56.8 - 1981 )
CALIBRATION DATA
- OF SENSORS SENSITIVITV(E) REPEATABILITY (r)
TEMPERATURE (T) 30 0.0100 deo..F 0.0500 deo. F PRESSURE (P) 2 0.0010 osta' O.0010 osia VAPOR PRESS (Pv) 10 0.0100 deo. F 0.0500 dec. F Length of Test (t) 10.0 hrs Test Pressure (P) 60.0 osig ==> 74.7 osia From Steam Table 0.0063 osi/deg. F (at 49 deg. F)
La 0.1000 wt%/dav INSTRUMENT MEASUREMENT ERRORS O
Go e7 = C(ET) 2
+ trT) 2 3
1/2
/C# of sensors 3 1/2 e7 = 0.0093 deg. F 2 2 1/2 1/2 ep = C(EP) + (rP) 3 /C# of sensors 3 ep = 0.0010 osia 2 2 1/2 1/2 ePv = C(EPv) + (rPv) 3 /C# of sensors 3 epv = 0.0001 osia INSTRUMENT SELECTION GUIDE 2 2 2 1/2 ISG = 2409/tt 2(eP/P) + 2(epv/P) + 2(eT/T) 3 ISG = 0.0074 wt%/ day 25% of La 0.0250 wt%/dav
(;;) ........................................................................
, I
- i. ,
1 1 .
- t t
i J'
! $ ! l 4
,i l h i
1 I !
1 f '
I 1
4 r
I 4
t 1
I 3 APPENDIX H J
Local Leakage Rate Test Results l
I a f
f s
i i J
{
l o
f'
,1 l,
f i
+
i i l i :
(
i
- 6 l
r 1
i 1
i G l
l l
1
(
i l \
[ .
PERSONNEL AIR LOCK LEAK RATE TEST ST-CONT-2, F.2 From pecvious ILRT-Type A to most recent, 1-11-83 to 10-7-85 4-12-83 3150 scem 1-25-84 3800 sccm 7-14-84 1950 sccm 1-23-85 3560 sccm 6-6-85 3600 sccm x
l O
N. /
I e
^
/ \
(_) EQUIPMENT llATCII 'O' RING SEAL TEST ST-CONT-2, F.3 Trom previous ILRT-Type A to most recent, 1-11-83 to 10-7-85 1-14-83 0 scem 1-19-83 0 sccm 3-26-83 3.44 sccm 3-5-84 0 sccm 3-29-84 2 scem 4-5-84 0 scem 5-7-85 0 scem 10-3-85 0 scem o
O C __ _- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ . - _ _ - - - - - - - - - . - - - - _ _
j
9 l
FUEL TRANSPER TUDE LEAK RATE TEST i
L ST-CONT-2, F.4 i From previous ILRT-Type A to most recent, 1-11-83 to 10-7-85 i
3-22-83 3.10 secm f 3-12-84 2 accm 4-28-84 3000 sccm 4-29-84 1 sccm 10-5-85 1.11 sccm ,
O l
l i
i r
O c j
f
- ELECTRICAL PENETRATION - TYPE B TEST ST-CONT-2, F.5 P;netration 1983 1984 1985 after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
A-1 N/T 0 0 0 A-2 N/T 0 0 0 A-3 N/T 0 0 0 A-4 N/T 0 0 0 A-5 N/T 0 0 0 A-6 N/T 0 0 0 A-7 N/T 0 0 0
( ,) A-8 N/T 0 0 0 A-9 N/T 0 0 0 A-10 0 0 0 0 A-11 N/T 0 0 0 B-1 N/T 0 0 0 B-2 N/T 0 0 0 B-3 N/T 0 0 0 B-4 N/T 0 0 0 B-5 N/T 0 0 0 B-6 N/T 0 0 0 B-7 N/T 0 0 0 l
B-8 N/T 0 0 0 l
B-9 N/T 0 0 0 o
l C B-10 !!/T 0 0 0 B-ll N/T 0 0 0 f
l
Penetration 1983 1984 1985 after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) l\~ -)
C-1 N/T 0 0 0 C-2 N/T 0 0 0 C-3 N/T 0 0 0 C-4 N/T 0 0 0 C-5 N/T 0 0 0 C-6 N/T 0 0 0 C-7 N/T 0 0 0 C-8 N/T 0 0 0 C-9 N/T 0 0 0 C-10 N/T 0 0 8 C-ll N/T 0 0 0 D-1 N/T 0 0 0 (m) D-2 N/T 0 0 0 D-3 N/T 0 0 0 D-4 N/T 0 0 0 D-5 N/T 0 0 0 D-6 N/T 0 0 0 D-7 N/T 0 0 0 D-8 N/T 0 0 0 D-9 N/T 0 0 0 D-10 N/T 0 0 0 D-11 0 0 29.67 0 E-1 N/T 0 0 0 E-2 N/T 0 0 0 E-3 N/T 0 0 0 (O
x- E-4 N/T 0 0 0 E-5 N/T 0 0 0 Y -- -]
{
S
/
Penetration 1983 1984 1985 m after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
E-6 N/T 0 0 0 E-7 N/T 0 0 0 E-8 N/T 0 0 0 E-9 N/T 0 0 0 E-10 N/T 0 0 0 E-11 0 0 0 0 F-1 N/T 0 0 0 F-2 N/T 0 0 0 F-3 N/T 0 0 0 F-4 N/T 0 0 0 P-5 N/T 0 0 0 F-6 N/T 0 0 0
( )
F-7 N/T 0 0 0 F-8 N/T 0 0 0 F-9 N/T 0 0 0 F-10 N/T 0 0 0 F-ll N/T 12.9 12.9 0 G-1 N/T 0 0 0 G-2 N/T 0 0 0 G-3 N/T 0 0 0 G-4 N/T 0 0 0 H-1 N/T 0 0 0 H-2 N/T 0 0 0 H-3 N/T 0 0 0
,o H-4 N/T 0 0 0 i )~
l E-HCV-383-3A N/T 4.33 4.33 0 E-HCV-383-3D N/T 0 0 1 L _ __. j
o*
Penetration 1983 1984 1985 after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 O (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
E-HCV-383-4A N/T 0 0 2 l
E-HCV-383-4B N/T 0 0 213 l l
Total 0 17.23 46.9 223 N/T - Not Tested l
l l
l C
< j
MECHANICAL SLEEVE LEAK RATE - TYPE B TEST j ST-CONT-2, F.6 t
Penetration 1983 1984 1985 after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
M-1 N/T 0 0 0 M-2 N/T 0 0 0 M-3 N/T 0- 0 0 M-4 N/T 0 0 0 M-5 N/T 0 0 0 M-6 N/T 0 0 0 ,
M-7 N/T 0 0 0 M-8 N/T 0 0 0 M-9 N/T 0 0 0 M-10 N/T 0 0 0 M-ll N/T 0 0 0 M-12 N/T 0 0 0 i- M-13 N/T 0 0 0 M-14 N/T 0 0 0 M-15 N/T 0 0 0 M-16 N/T 0 0 0 M-17 N/T 0 0 0 M-18 N/T 0 0 0 M-19 N/T 0 0 0 M-20 .N/T 0 0 0 M-21 N/T 0 0 0 M-22 N/T 0 0 0 J
s.
Punetration 1983 1984 1985 gs after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85
- t] (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM).
M-23 N/T 0 0 0 M-24 N/T 0 0 0 M-25 N/T 0 0 0 M-26 N/T 0 0 0 M-27 N/T 0 0 0 M-28 N/T 'O O O M-29 N/T 0 0 0 M-30 N/T 0 0 0 M-31 N/T 0 0 0 M-32 N/T 0 0 0 M-33 N/T 0 .0 0 M-34 M/T 0 0 0 M-35 N/T 0 0 0 M-36 N/T 0 0 0 M-37 N/T 0 0 0 M-38 'N/T 0 0 0 M-39 N/T 0 0 0 M-40 N/T 0 0 0 M-41 N/T 0 0 0 ,
M-42 N/T 0. 0 0 M-43 N/T 0 0 0 M-44 N/T 0 0 0 M-45 N/T 0 0 0 '
M-46. N/T 0 0 0 M-47 N/T 0 0 0 O M-48 N/T. 6.66 6.66 7 M-49 N/T 0 0 0 Y _ _ _ . . . . _ . _ . . _ . . . . . - _ _
Penetration 1983 1984 1985 after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85
-[ -
(SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) -(SCCM)-
M-50 N/T 0 0 0 M-51' N/T 0 'O O M-52 N/T 43.2 43.2 9 M-53 N/T 0 0 0 M-54 N/T 0 0 0 M-55 N/T 0 ~0. O M-56 N/T 0 0 0 M-57 N/T 0 0 'O M-58 N/T 0 0 O M-59 N/T 0 0 0 M-60 N/T 0 0 0
'M-61 N/T 0 0 0-
!p'd - M-62 N/T 0 0 0 M-63 N/T 0 0 0 M-64 N/T 0 0 0 M-65 N/T 0 0 0 M-66 N/T 0 0 0 M-67 N/T 0 0 O M-68 N/T 0 0 0 M-69 N/T 0 0 0 M-70 N/T 0 0 0 M-71 N/T 0 0 0 M-72 N/T 0 0 0 M-73 N/T 0 0 0 M-74 N/T 0 0 0 M-75 N/T 0 0 0 M-76 N/T 0 0 0 Y )
Penetration 1983 1984 1985
, after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
M-77 N/T 'O O O M-78 N/T 0 0 0 M-79 N/T 0 0 0 M-80 N/T 0 0 0 M-81 N/T 0 0 0 M-82 N/T 0 0 0 M-83 N/T 0 0 0 M-84 N/T 0 0 0 M-85 N/T 11.5 11.5 2 M-86 N/T 0 0 0 M-87 N/T 0 0 0 I
M-88 N/T 0 0 0
. M-89 N/T 0 0 0 M-90 N/T 0 0 0 M-91 N/T 0 0 0 i
M-92 N/T 0 0 0 M-93 N/T 0 0 0 M-94 N/T 0 0 0 M-95 N/T 520 520 0 M-96 N/T 0 0 0
~
M-97 N/T 0 0 0 M-98 N/T 0 0 0 M-99 N/T 0 0 0 t
M-383-3 0 0 0 0 M-383-4 0 1380 0 900 l Total 0 1961.36 581.36 918 N/T - Not Tested
[. .,
]
i' PIPING LEAK RATE - TYPE C TEST ST-CONT-3 Penetration- 1983 1984 1985 after 1-11-83 'As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
M-2 N/T. O. 0 0 M-7 N/T 0 0 0 M-8 N/T 0 0 N/T
- M-9 N/T 0 0 1
- M-10 N/T 3000 0 220 M-ll 0 0 0 N/T
- M-12 N/T 0 0 0
[ **M-13 0 120 0 23 M-14 N/.T 10052.5 6.67 5 M-15 0 0 0 N/T M-16 100 70 70 N/T M-18 0 0 0 N/T M-19 0 0 0 N/T M-20 N/T 0 0 0 M-22 N/T 2300 0 0 M-24 N/T 0 1 0 M-25 N/T 0 0 N/T M-30 35 0 0 0 M-31 2 0 0 0 M-31-2 N/T 0 0 0 M-38-1 N/T 0 0 0 M-38-2 N/T 2.6 2.6 0 Y J
t
. Penetration 1983 1984 1985 after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
M-39 4 0 0 N/T M-40-1 0 0 0 2 M-40-2 N/T 0 0 0 M-42 0 0 0 N/T M-43 N/T 0 0 N/T M-45 5 900 0 3700 M-46-1 N/T 9.6 '9.6 2 M-46-2 N/T 0 0 0 M-47-1 N/T 0 0 N/T M-47-2 N/T 0 0 N/T M-48-1 N/T 250 250 0 M-48-2 N/T 4.5 4.5 0 d(' **M-49 N/T 0 5.6 0 M-50-1 N/T 0 0 0 M-50-2 N/T 0 0 9 M-51-1 N/T 2250 13.7 0 M-51-2 N/T 150 48 13 M-52-1 0 0 0 0
~
M-52-2 0 200 0 330 M-53 3 0 0 N/T M-57-1 0 0 0 6 M-57-2 0 0 0 0 M-58-1 0 0 0 1 M-58-2 0 1100 0 0
- M-63 N/T 90' 0 -132 M-69 0 0 0 0 M-72 0 N/A N/A 0 K /
- 6. b
.F Penetration. 1983 1984 1985
~
after 1-11-83 As Found As Left Prior to 10-7-85 L k'_)- (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
M-73 N/T 0 0 0 M-74 N/T 0 0 0 M-79 N/T 0 0 0 M-80 N/T 0 0. O M-86 2100 2000 2000 N/T M-87 0 2200 2700 3100 M-88 1000 2250 0 1050 M-89 1300 0 0 N/T
- M-91 N/T 26 26 67
- M-93 110 2150 145 10
- M-94 N/T 1800 0 4930
_ **M-95 N/T MAX 0 11327
\-) **M-96 N/T .94 scfm 850 0
- M-97 N/T 300 6.54 30 HCV-383-3 N/T 0 0 0 HCV-383-4 N/T 0 0 0 Total 4,549 23,739.2 5,106.07 8,218 N/T - Not Tested
- Penetration leak rates referenced to this mark do not contri-bute towards the 0.6 La maximum allowable leakage.
NOTE: The totals listed above only include those leakages contri-ing towards the 0.6 La leakage limit.
3 (a
Y .
.)