(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20199L5891997-12-24024 December 1997 Independent Analysis & Evaluation of AM-241 & Transuranics & Subsequent Dose to Two Male Workers at Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Plant ML20210P8721997-08-31031 August 1997 Post Decommissioning Activities Rept, for Aug 1997 ML20141A0041997-05-31031 May 1997 Independent Assessment of Radiological Controls Program at Cyap Haddam Neck Plant Final Rept May 1997 ML20137H3031997-03-31031 March 1997 Rev 2 to Nuclear Training Loit/Lout Audit Reviews ML20137C6281997-03-14014 March 1997 Redacted Version of Rev 1 to Nuclear Training Loit/Lout Audit Reviews ML20135E3221997-02-13013 February 1997 Independent Review Team Rept 1996 MP -1 Lout NRC Exam Failures ML20134L2751997-02-0303 February 1997 Draft Rev to GPRI-30, Spent Fuel Storage Facility Licensing Basis/Design Basis ML20134L2911997-01-0808 January 1997 Rev 0 to UFSAR Rev Grpi ML20237E0751996-12-31031 December 1996 Decommissioning Cost Study for Connecticut Yankee Nuclear Power Plant ML20204B6811996-12-31031 December 1996 Nuclear Lemons Assessment of America Worst Commerical Nuclear Power Plants. 5th Edition ML20134L2591996-12-31031 December 1996 Rev 0 to Sys Reclassification ML20134L2721996-12-31031 December 1996 Commitment Mgt Grpi ML20134L2481996-12-30030 December 1996 Rev 0 to Sys Needed for Decommissioning Sys Evaluation Process ML20135E2711996-12-26026 December 1996 Evaluation of Intakes by Two Workers at CT Yankee Atomic Power Co ML20134L2841996-12-23023 December 1996 Rev 0 to Spent Fuel Pool Island Studies ML20134L2381996-12-19019 December 1996 Rev 0 to Accident Analysis ML20134L2871996-12-19019 December 1996 Rev 0 to Grpi for Defueled Condition Fire Protection Technical Requirements ML20058G3481993-10-31031 October 1993 Nonproprietary VIPRE/WRB-1 DNBR Thermal Limit for Westinghouse Fuel Types, for Oct 1993 ML20058G6771993-09-29029 September 1993 Rev 0 to Project Assignment 91-006, Connecticut Yankee Event V Mods ML20058L7411993-07-15015 July 1993 QA Svcs Dept Surveillance Rept SS-169, Assessment of Fitness for Duty Program ML20127J5391992-11-30030 November 1992 Connecticut Yankee Structural Reevaluation of Plant Structures to Address SEP Topic III-7.B Load Combinations Code Changes ML20125E5661992-03-31031 March 1992 Nonproprietary PWR SG Tube Repair Limits:Technical Support Document for Expansion Zone PWSCC in Roll Transitions Final Rept A08995, Rev 1 to Auxiliary Initiation Event Analysis1990-09-14014 September 1990 Rev 1 to Auxiliary Initiation Event Analysis ML20062G4951990-07-31031 July 1990 Rev 3 to Northeast Utils USNRC Read & Sign ML20055G4951990-07-31031 July 1990 Decommissioning Financial Assurance Certification Rept ML20055D8931990-06-30030 June 1990 Fracture Mechanics Evaluation:Haddam Neck Pressurizer ML20246N9421989-08-31031 August 1989 Tornado Missile Risk Analysis of Bleed & Feed & Auxiliary Feedwater Safe Shutdown Sys at Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Station ML20206J9991988-10-31031 October 1988 Crdr Summary Rept, Per Suppl 1 to NUREG-0737 ML20153G4081988-06-0303 June 1988 Rev 0 to Conneticut Yankee Replace Nuclear Instrumentation Sys, Neo Project Description ML20153G4031988-03-0808 March 1988 Rev 0 to, Connecticut Yankee Modernize Reactor Protection Sys - Phase 2, Conceptual Project Description ML20235B5911987-09-24024 September 1987 Undated Technical Evaluation:Haddam Neck Plant Reanalysis of Non-LOCA DBAs & Tech Spec Change Requests in Support of Reload Cycle 15 B12619, Bimonthly Progress Rept 5:New Switchgear Bldg Const1987-07-31031 July 1987 Bimonthly Progress Rept 5:New Switchgear Bldg Const ML20214R6371987-06-30030 June 1987 Technical Rept Supporting Cycle 15 Operation ML20205Q7011987-04-30030 April 1987 Bimonthly Progress Rept 3:New Switchgear Bldg Const B12480, Const Design Info Submittal:New Switchgear Bldg Const. W/38 Oversize Encl1987-04-30030 April 1987 Const Design Info Submittal:New Switchgear Bldg Const. W/38 Oversize Encl ML20209C7161986-12-31031 December 1986 Vols 1 & 2 to Isap,Haddam Neck Plant,Final Rept ML20238C3821986-12-31031 December 1986 Connecticut Yankee 1986 Steam Generator Repair Outage ALARA Rept ML20238C3751986-12-31031 December 1986 Connecticut Yankee 1986 Core XIII - Xiv Refueling Outage ALARA Rept ML20202D5071986-06-30030 June 1986 Non-LOCA Transient Analysis ML20206J8871986-06-30030 June 1986 Isap Public Safety Impact Model Project Analyses Summaries ML20205T1201986-05-19019 May 1986 Steam Generator Tube Insp Rept for 1986 Refueling Outage ML20205T1231986-05-0808 May 1986 Steam Generator Tube W/55% Through Wall Defect Safety Evaluation for Structural Integrity CY-86-031, Rev 1 to 4.10.1(D) Inservice Insp of Steam Generator Tubes (Acceptance Criteria)1986-05-0808 May 1986 Rev 1 to 4.10.1(D) Inservice Insp of Steam Generator Tubes (Acceptance Criteria) ML20138B2001986-03-31031 March 1986 Status of Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test Program ML20138B1831986-03-31031 March 1986 Schedular Exemption Requests Re Type C Leak Testing ML20138B1561986-03-31031 March 1986 Permanent Exemptions Re Types a & C Leak Testing ML20199L0731986-03-31031 March 1986 Probabilistic Safety Study,Northeast Util Svc Company Evaluation of Probabilistic Safety Study Results B12020, Summary of Results of Haddam Neck Probabilistic Safety Study1986-03-31031 March 1986 Summary of Results of Haddam Neck Probabilistic Safety Study ML20155E7591986-02-28028 February 1986 Best Estimate LOCA Analysis, Vol 5 CY-85-062, Rev 2 to Steam Generator Tube Sleeving & Plugging1986-01-22022 January 1986 Rev 2 to Steam Generator Tube Sleeving & Plugging 1997-08-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217K3301999-10-19019 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 195 to License DPR-61 ML20206C8761999-04-28028 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 194 to License DPR-61 CY-99-047, Ro:On 981217,identified Unsuccessful Dewatering of Cnsi HIC, Model PL8-120R,containing Resins.Caused by Apparent Failure of Dewatering Tree.Other HICs Have Been Procured,Recertified & Returned to Plant for Use1999-03-23023 March 1999 Ro:On 981217,identified Unsuccessful Dewatering of Cnsi HIC, Model PL8-120R,containing Resins.Caused by Apparent Failure of Dewatering Tree.Other HICs Have Been Procured,Recertified & Returned to Plant for Use ML20206F1971998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept for 1998 for Cyap. with CY-99-027, Annual Rept for 10CFR50.59, for Jan-Dec 1998.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept for 10CFR50.59, for Jan-Dec 1998.With ML20198G9101998-12-22022 December 1998 Proposed Rev 2 of Cyap QAP for Haddam Neck Plant. Marked Up Rev 1 Included ML20238F2131998-08-28028 August 1998 SER Accepting Defueled Emergency Plan for Emergency Planning for Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co CY-98-136, Ro:On 980727,flow Blockage Occurred & Caused Pressure in Sys to Increase,Resulting in Relief Valve Lifting & Pipe Vibration,Which Caused Leaks to Develop.Caused by Nearly Closed post-filter Inlet Valve.Repaired 2 Leaks in Line1998-08-12012 August 1998 Ro:On 980727,flow Blockage Occurred & Caused Pressure in Sys to Increase,Resulting in Relief Valve Lifting & Pipe Vibration,Which Caused Leaks to Develop.Caused by Nearly Closed post-filter Inlet Valve.Repaired 2 Leaks in Line ML20237B7461998-07-22022 July 1998 1998 Defueled Emergency Plan Exercise Scenario Manual, Conducted on 980722 ML20202D1621998-06-30030 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 193 to License DPR-61 CY-98-068, Follow-up to Verbal Notification on 980413 of Film on Discharge Canal.Investigation Continuing.Samples Collected for Petroleum Analyses & Biological Characterization at Intake Structure & Discharge Canal.Replaced Sorbent Booms1998-04-15015 April 1998 Follow-up to Verbal Notification on 980413 of Film on Discharge Canal.Investigation Continuing.Samples Collected for Petroleum Analyses & Biological Characterization at Intake Structure & Discharge Canal.Replaced Sorbent Booms CY-98-045, Ro:On 980212,0219,0225 & 0312,separate Sheens of Approx One Cup of oil-like Substance Was Observed at Discharge Canal. Cause Has Not Been Clearly Identified.Called in Vendor Spill to Install Sorbent Booms to Absorb Sheen.W/One Drawing1998-04-13013 April 1998 Ro:On 980212,0219,0225 & 0312,separate Sheens of Approx One Cup of oil-like Substance Was Observed at Discharge Canal. Cause Has Not Been Clearly Identified.Called in Vendor Spill to Install Sorbent Booms to Absorb Sheen.W/One Drawing ML20217F0611998-03-31031 March 1998 Historical Review Team Rept ML20217A0001998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20217K2101998-03-27027 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 192 to License DPR-61 CY-98-046, Follow-up to 980311 Verbal Notification of Film on Discharge Canal.Cause Not Yet Determined.Film Is Contained & Will Be Absorbed by Containment & Sorbent Booms That Were in Place in Discharge Canal1998-03-12012 March 1998 Follow-up to 980311 Verbal Notification of Film on Discharge Canal.Cause Not Yet Determined.Film Is Contained & Will Be Absorbed by Containment & Sorbent Booms That Were in Place in Discharge Canal ML20216D6531998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20217D7381998-02-28028 February 1998 Revised MOR for Feb 1998 Haddam Neck Plant CY-98-012, Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Connecticut Yankee Haddam Neck Plant1998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Connecticut Yankee Haddam Neck Plant CY-98-010, Annual Rept for 10CFR50.59,Jan-Dec,19971997-12-31031 December 1997 Annual Rept for 10CFR50.59,Jan-Dec,1997 ML20198N6681997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20217P4861997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Financial Rept, for Cyap ML20199L5891997-12-24024 December 1997 Independent Analysis & Evaluation of AM-241 & Transuranics & Subsequent Dose to Two Male Workers at Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Plant ML20203K4271997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20199B1141997-10-31031 October 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20198M8101997-10-14014 October 1997 SER Accepting Proposed Revs to Util Quality Assurance Program at Facility ML20198J8811997-09-30030 September 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20210P8721997-08-31031 August 1997 Post Decommissioning Activities Rept, for Aug 1997 ML20217Q3171997-08-31031 August 1997 Addl Changes to Proposed Rev 1 to QA Program ML20210U9301997-08-31031 August 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant CY-97-082, Special Rept:On 970708,routine Surveillance Testing of Seismic Monitoring Sys Instrumentation Revealed,Data Was Not Being Reproduced by Portion of Playback Sys.Station Presently Pursuing Replacement of Seismic Monitoring Sys1997-08-14014 August 1997 Special Rept:On 970708,routine Surveillance Testing of Seismic Monitoring Sys Instrumentation Revealed,Data Was Not Being Reproduced by Portion of Playback Sys.Station Presently Pursuing Replacement of Seismic Monitoring Sys ML20210L0521997-07-31031 July 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1997 for HNP ML20149E4451997-06-30030 June 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20141A0041997-05-31031 May 1997 Independent Assessment of Radiological Controls Program at Cyap Haddam Neck Plant Final Rept May 1997 ML20140H5241997-05-31031 May 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20141K4201997-05-22022 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 191 to License DPR-61 ML20141D4141997-04-30030 April 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1997 for Connecticut Yankee Haddam Neck ML20138G5901997-04-25025 April 1997 Proposed Rev 1 to Cyap QA Program for Haddam Neck Plant ML20137W8051997-03-31031 March 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20137H3031997-03-31031 March 1997 Rev 2 to Nuclear Training Loit/Lout Audit Reviews ML20137C6281997-03-14014 March 1997 Redacted Version of Rev 1 to Nuclear Training Loit/Lout Audit Reviews ML20137A0801997-02-28028 February 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant ML20135C5101997-02-26026 February 1997 1996 Refuel Outage ISI Summary Rept for CT Yankee Atomic Power Co B16268, Special Rept:On 970205,declared Main Stack-Wide Range Noble Gas Monitor Inoperable.Caused by Inadequate Calibr Methods. Will Revise Calibr Procedure to Technique to Demonstrate Accuracy & Linearity Over Intended Range of Monitor1997-02-19019 February 1997 Special Rept:On 970205,declared Main Stack-Wide Range Noble Gas Monitor Inoperable.Caused by Inadequate Calibr Methods. Will Revise Calibr Procedure to Technique to Demonstrate Accuracy & Linearity Over Intended Range of Monitor ML20135E3221997-02-13013 February 1997 Independent Review Team Rept 1996 MP -1 Lout NRC Exam Failures ML20134L2751997-02-0303 February 1997 Draft Rev to GPRI-30, Spent Fuel Storage Facility Licensing Basis/Design Basis ML20138K5721997-01-31031 January 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1997 for Haddam Neck Plant.W/ ML20134L2791997-01-10010 January 1997 Rev 0 to QA Program Grpi ML20134L2911997-01-0808 January 1997 Rev 0 to UFSAR Rev Grpi ML20134L2721996-12-31031 December 1996 Commitment Mgt Grpi 1999-04-28
[Table view] |
Text
. .. - . . _ . .
h l
1
! Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning 4
- System Reclassification i
GRPI Revision 0 Prepared by:' Date: M'3 0 - %
- Peter Clark Approved by
- /\ Date: N/ ?//F h D. H'aselti5e 3
l 9702180387 970206 ~'
- c. PDR ADOCK 05000213 1 F PDR
l l
J System Reclassification GRPI i Revision 0 i Goals: l The goal of this effort is to provide a method for reclassifying systems from QA Category
- I to non-QA and/or augmented QA category. This GRPI is being developed in support 4
of the Integrated Plan for Initial Decommissioning of Connecticut Yankee dated November 25,.1996. l Roles: l
. The roles and responsibilities for personnel associated with system reclassification are as l follows; e
The Engineermg Director will assign a Cognizant Engineer who will be responsible or the overall coordination of the reclassification of systems. l e
The Cognizant Engineer will be responsible for the development of procedures and guidelines for reclassifying system.
- The Cognizant Engineer will coordinate the reclassification process and will maintain the database of reclassified systems.
The Cognizant Engineer will solicit support from Engineering, Licensing, Safety Analysis and Operation on reclassifying systems.
3 e Licensing and Safety Analysis will provide design basis input (PSDAR, UFSAR, l Technical Specification, Security Plan, QA Topical) which will be factored into the I process and procedures for reclassifying system. I e Design Engineering will process system reclassification evaluations.
. Operations will oversee the results of Design Engineering's system reclassification evaluations.
Process:
The decommissioning activities that are tied to system reclassification are decommissioning cost estimate, PSDAR, UFSAR. Technical Specification, Security Plan, QA Topical, nuclear island design specification and DCM. The process for reclassifying system must consider all of these activities.
The system reclassification process will be developed using ANSI /ANS 51.1 Nuclear Safety Criteriafor the Design ofStationary Pressurized Water Reactor Plant as a guide for reclar sifying systems. This instruction applicable to in-service nuclear plants and the that appik able portions of the ANSI Standard will be adapted for the decommissioning process.
The initial phase of the reclassification process will consist of a series of team meetings to solicit input into reclassification and discuss the process and procedures that will be developed. These meeting will evaluate the following; I
e Benefits associated with system reclassification and the schedule for performing the reclassification, i.e. now versus a year from now.
e The method, i.e. processes and procedures, that will be used for reclassifying systems.
- Licensing restraints associated with reclassification, i.e. can system reclassification occur prior to the revising and issuing the UFSAR, Technical Specification, Security Plan, QA Topical and PSDAR7 The current method of classifykng system is the MEPL Program However, the program is a complex program that was designed for in-service nuclear power plants and this process may not be appropriate for the decommissioned mode. The team will have to evaluate and determine if there are other options or processes that could be used for reclassifying systems. One possible process that has been mentioned is WCM 2.2-11, Disposition ofInfrequently Used and Abandoned Equipment. The abandon equipment process is currently being used to identify systems that are not needed for decommissioning. This process could be modified for system reclassification. Another option that may also exist for system reclassification is the DCM revision that is being prepared to address nuclear plant decommissioning. The DCM revision could be adapted to address system reclassification.
Internersonal D.I=tions-The process and procedures that are developed for reclassification of system will be integrated with the 16 major deliverables as identified in the Integrated Plan for Initial Decommissioning of Connecticut Yankee. The interpersonal relations that are associated with the reclassification of systems will involve the interaction with a number of groups and individuals that are outside of CY Engineering, Licensing and Operations organizations. 'Ihese groups include; e Engineering Programs support maybe required for input into the revised program for performing system reclassification evaluations.
e The nuclear island design specification and DCM revision must address the classification of new systems and the reclassification of obsolete systems.
- The reclassification of systems will involve a working relationship with Yankee personnel who have worked on similar areas for the Rowe decommissioning. Efforts will be taken to learn from Yankee's experiences.
- This effort will also consider " Industry Experience" for guidelines into reclassifying system. Nuclear Information Network Inquiries TI-17-12 and DE-7077 are currently posted and are requesting industry information, procedures and guidelines on reclassifying systems.
. The reclassification of systems will also need to consider " Systems needed for Decommissioning" and the status of those systems during various stages of decommissioning. The Cognizant Engineer that is assigned responsibility for identifying and maintaining a list of the " Systems needed for Decommissioning" will become closely involved in the reclassification process.
Revision 0 dated December 30,1996 2
-