ML20217Q317

Addl Changes to Proposed Rev 1 to QA Program

ML20217Q317
Person / Time
Site:	Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date:	08/31/1997
From:	CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20217Q315	List: CY-97-085, Forwards Addl Changes to Proposed Rev 1 to Util QA Program Which Was Transmitted IAW 10CFR50.54(a)(3),in . Annotated Copy & Retyped Pages of Addl Changes,Encl ML20217Q317
References
NUDOCS 9709020339
Download: ML20217Q317 (29)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:.. - Qocket No. 50-213 CY-97-085 Attachment A i Haddam Neck Plant Additional Changes to Prooosed Revision 1 to the Quality Assurance Proaram August 1997 ~ 9709020339-970821 -PDR ADOCK 05000213 -W PDR

-) U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ~ C-97-085/ Attachment NPage 1 l Attachment A Additional Changes to Proposed Revision 1 to the Quality Assurance Program CYQAP Page/Section Summary of Changes Repaginated and relocated the Note on Page 5 to correct word processing. 3,4,5,6 a h ) Clarified the reporting chain of command for the Manager-Nuclear Safety Engineering. 4&5 Section 1.4.1.5 ~11 Section 2.2.6 Deleted the phrase *in accordance with Technical Specifications." It was an incorrect reference. Change the term " supplier" to " vendor". Consistency throughout the section. 26,27,28 Section 7.2 Deleted "or". Ensure consistency in requirements for test program documents. 39 Section 11.2.2.f Reinstated a sentence that was inadvertently deleted during the revision process. 43 Section 12.2.2 Clarified the methodology and documentation requirements for SSCs to ensure that the 57 Appendix A defueled UFSAR properly addresses quality activities. Corrected the reference to the revision and date applicable to CY. 61 Regulatory Guide 1.70

.s'- 4. Docket No. 50-213 CY-97-085 l i L i Attachment B Haddam Neck Plant - Annotated Pages of Additional Changes for Pronosed Revision 1 to the Quality 1 Assurance Proaram August 1997

ktfaf nfe i he Vice President provides management with objective evidence of the performance of activities affecting quality, independent of the individual or group directly responsible for performing the specific activity. lie has the authority and organizational freedom to verify activities affecting quality. This is performed independent of undue influences and responsibilities for schedules and costs lie has the responsibility and authority, delineated in writing, to stop unsatisfactory work and control further processing, delivery, or installation of nonconforming materials. Ile also has the responsibility and authority to identify quality problems, to recommend or provide solutions, and to verify their implementation. The Vice President - Nu; lear Oversight is also responsible for the Employee Concems Program, independent Safety Engineering and Operating Experience Program and the Audit program. Specifically, the key support activities for the Nuclear Oversight program at the llNP are provided by: 1.4.1.1 Director - Emnloyee Concerns The Director - Employce Concems is responsible for the direction and administration of the Employee Concerns Program for Northeast Utilities. The Director assures that nuclear safety concems receive appropriate management attention and that concerns are addressed in a timely manner. 1.4.1.2 Director-Audits and Evaluation. The Director - Audits and Evaluation is responsible for the direction and administration of the audit program to verify: ccmpliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, other regulatory requirements; and implementation of the CYQAP requirements and evaluate performance. The Director provides support to the CYQAP as described in the Nuclear Oversight Department Procedures. 1.4.1.3 Director - Performance Evaluation The Director - Performance Evaluation is rerponsible for the direction and administration of the Nuclear Oversight program at . the IINP as well as the other nuclear units within the NU system. At CY he is assisted by the the Manager - CY Oversight. QAP 1.0 3 CYQAP REV: 01 o

ktfMyina btk 1.4,1.4 Manager - CY Oversicht The Manager - CY Oversight manages the audit, st n tillance and i inspection activities of the llNP. lie is responsible for:

a. Managing the Nuclear Oversight program for audits, suncillances and inspections;

b. Verifying compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and other regulatory requirements; c, Verifying the implementation of the CYQAP requirements;

d. Evaluating performance and identification of strengths and weaknesses;

c. Providing recommendations for improving nuclear performance at HNP;

f. Serving as the primary NU Nuclear Oversight management interface with HNP management; and

g. Stop unsatisfactory work.

The Manager - CY Oversight is a member of the CY Nuclear Safety Assessment Board. The Manager-CY Oversight has direct communication to the CY staff, Directors and Executive Vice President and provides the daily interaction on matters affecting quality, nuclear safety, and nuclear related activities. 1.4.1.5 Manneer - Nuclear Safety Eneineerine The Manager-Nuclear Safety Engineering manages the day-to-day activities of the Northeast Utilities Independent Safety Engineering Program and the Operating Experience Program in compliance with the appropriate unit Technical Specifications and licensing commitments. Operating Experience personnel are assigned to support the CY Oversight Manager. The Manager-Nuclear Safety Engineering provides technical direction for the CY Operating Experience activities. QAP 1.0 4 CYCIA P REV: 01

7 As a c.b The Manager-Nuclear Safety Engineering reports to the Nuclear Oversight Director-Analysis and Programs and ultimately to the Vice President-Nuclear Oversight. These functions are located at the Millstone Point nuclear site and are defincel in the NUQAP Topical Report. NOTE R.s.t.<4Tara i The Nuclear Oversight Organization is described in theNortheast Utilities Quality Assurance Program Topical Report (NUQAP). The specific functions within the Nuclear Oversight organization applied to the CYQAP are described herein. Additional support functions are provided on an as needed or as requested support basis. I l 1.4.2 The Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer-The CY EVP & CNO has the overall responsibility to implement the CYQAP at the llNP and in providing support services to the operating staff. 1,4,2.1 The Director Site Operations and Decommissioning (DSOD)is res, asible for implementation of the CYQAP for the unit and is responsible for the HNP's safe operation He has control over those suppon activities necessary for safe operation, maintenance and decommissioning of the plant He has delegated the necessary authority and assigned responsibility for the management of these activities to the: 1,4,2.1.1 Unit Director The Unit Director is responsible for the direction and administration of the unit's Operations, Mechanical, Electrical, and I&C, unit Maintenance and Modifications, Technical Specification Surveillance Planning and Scheduling, Security, Chemistry, Health Physics, and Radwaste activities. The Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) reports to the Unit Director in compliance with Technical Specifications. QAP 1.0 5 CYQAP REV: 01 J

/ d g( 1.4 2.1.2 Ensincerine Director The Engineering Director is responsible for the administration of Unit Design Engineering, Radiation Protection Engineering. Engineering Programs, Configuration Management Program, and Licensing lie is responsible for maintaining the Design Bases in accordance with the Licensing Bases. lie is also responsible for regulatory compliance; commitment management; self assessment and corrective action programs administration. 1.4.2.1.3 Business Manager The Business Manager is responsible for managing and 1 coordinating the financial reporting and control functions for CYAPCO during decommissioning. lie oversees materials, inventory reduction and salvage and the administration of contracts. l.4.2.1.4 Decommissionine Proiect Manager The Decommissioning Project Manager is responsible for the overall management ofwork planning and scheduling for unit operations, decommissioning, demolition, and dismantling. activities. i QAP 1.0. 6 CYQAP REV: 01

• 2.2.5 INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING A program is established and maintained for quality assurance indoctrination and training which provides confidence that the required level of personnel competence and skill is achieved and maintained in the performance of quality activities. Quality procedures delineate the requirements for an indoctrination program to assure that personnel responsible for performing quality activities are instructed in the purpose, scope, and implementa' ion of quality procedures and Instructions and that coms.llance to these documents is mandatory. Each CY Director is responsible for ensuring appropriate indoctrination and training of assigned personnel performing quality activities.

Nuclear training programs shall be developed and implemented to provide training for individuals attached to or associated with the IINP. Additional guidance is established in procedures. Implementing procedures describe the nuclear training program requirements which assure that: Documentation of fomial training and qualification programs includes the objective, content of the program, attendees, date of attendance, and examination results, as applicable; i '~ Proficiency of personnel performing and verifying activities affecting quality is established and maintained. Personnel proficiency is established and maintained by training, examination / testing, and/or certification based upon the requirements of the activity. Acceptance criteria are developed to determine ifindividuals are properly trained and qualified; and Certificates or other documentation of qualification clearly delineate the specific functions personnel are qualified to perform and the criteria used to qualify personnelih each function. 2.2.6 MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT OF TIIE OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM The CY Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Ollicer ensures that a management review of the CY Quality Assurance Program is conducted annually to assess the effectiveness of the QA program. This is accomplished by performing an independent assessment of the progran+ mm~;r " = lubmci3 &-m-a%-{in addition, the CY Nuclear Safety Assessment Board performs an ' oversight of the program in accordance with the approved charter. Results of the assessments and reports are forwarded to the Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer and the Vice President-Nuclear Oversight fbr appropriate corrective action, as necessary, QAP 2.0 11 CYQAP REV: 01

QAP7.0 CONTROL OF PURCilASED MATERIAL, EQUlPMENT. AND SERVICES 7.1 GENERAL REOUIREMENTS Measures for the control of procured material, equipment, parts and services by or for CY related to the safety of nuclear power plants are established and imposed by the CYQAP during maintenance and modification to the HNP to ensure conformance to procurement documents. These measures include provisions for source evaluation and selection, submission of objective evidence by the contractor or subcontractor, inspection at the vendor source and examination ofitems upon delivery. Control of quality by vendors and i subcontractors is assessed for effectiveness at intervals consistent with the importance, complexity and quantity of the product or service. 7.2 IMPLEMENTATION The evaluation and selection of vendors is performed in accordance with procedures, which j specify that procurement source evaluation and selection measures are performed to determine vendor capability and delineate responsibilities of qualified personnel involved in the evaluation and selection process. 7.2.1 VENDOR OUALIFICATIONS Nuclear Materials and Document Management utilizes one or mo e following methods in evaluating the qualifications of a potentia supplier:

a. Audits and/or coordinated review of a potentia supplier tilizing NU/CY

personnel and/or YAEC personnel;

b. Other utility audits and evaluations;

c. Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee (NUPIC) audits;

d. ASME N, NA, NPT, NV, or MM/ MS Certificate of Authorization;

c. Commercial grade surveys and/or coordinated review of a potential tilizing one or more departments, (i.e., Engineering, Operations and/

urchasing);or

f. Source 'nspection/ surveillance.

[ /MS EAT heA4 QAP 7.0 26 \\/em be 4 h CYQAP "$o g lee /t.. REV: 01 1 1 __j

Evaluations ensure tha@uppliers):mploy a quality assurance program that conforms to applicable portions of the NUQAP Topical Report and/or the CYQAP. Nuclear Materials and Document Management is responsible for maintaining documented evidence of the evaluation and acceptance of the vendor's quality assurance program. The determination of vendor approval is based on such factors as prior performance, quality performance data, audits, commercial grade surveys, surveillances and evaluations of the supplier's quality assurance program. Vendors' Certificates of Conformance are periodically evaluated by audits, l commercial grade surveys, surveillances, independent inspections and tests, to assure they are valid. This verification of Certificates of Conformance is documented. 7.2.2 SOURCE INSPECTION Nuclear Materials and Document Management is responsible for the perfomiance of source inspections at suppliers' facilities to ensure that the requirements of a Purchase Order / Contract have been met. j I Source inspections are performed in accordance with procedures which provide I for the method ofinspection, the extent of documentation required, and those responsible for implementing those instructions. Inspection ofitems occurs either when verifications of procurement requirements cannot be determined upon receipt or the vendor's QA program has not been accepted by Nuclear Materials and Document Management. Nuclear Materials and Document Management has contracted the performance of the vendor source inspection function to the Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) in accordance with the NUQAP Topical Report. CY has accepted the NU vendor QA process described in the NUQAP Topical Report based on audits performed to accept the YAEC process. 7.2.3 RECEIPT INSPECTION Receipt inspection for procured items is performed by Nuclear Materials mid Document Management in accordance with quality procedures which delineate requirements and responsibilities necessary to perform inspection functions. An exception to this is Chemistry performing receipt inspection for diesel fuel m accordance with CY procedures. Contractua' obligation fulfillment and specified requirements are verified during receipt inspections. QAP 7.0 27 CYQAP REV: 01

Receipt inspaction ohfurnished material and equipment is performed to 1 i assure that material, components, equipment and acceptance records are examined in accordance with predetermined inspection instructions prior to acceptance, installation and operation. Receipt inspections include, as appropriate:

a. Measures for verifying that the shipment is complete, properly identified, undamaged and corresponds with the required documentation;

b. Measures for inspection of the item and review of supporting documentation (e.g., mill test reports, NDE reports) as required by the purchase documents;

c. Measures for inspection and acceptance ofitems in accordance with predetermined methods;

d. Measures for identifying and controlling acceptable items including identification ofinspection status prior to release from the receipt L

inspection area; l

e. Measures for identifying, segregating and handling nonconforming items;

f. Measures to ascertain that inspection records or certificates of conformance are acceptable prior to release for installation; and/or

g. In cases involving procurement of senices, the project engineer or department head shall designate the means by which senices may be accepted, and is given the authority to accept services in accordance with methods defined in NU or CY procedures.

7.2.4 VENDOR FURNISHED RECORDS Records required to be furnished by the vendor are specified in the procurement document. Certifications or documentation provided by the supplier which attests to conformance, identifies that all the specific procurement requirements have been met (either by reference to the purchase order or by delineation). The vendor must fumish the following records as a minimum:

a. Documentation that identifies the purchased material or equipment and the spe:ific procurement requirements. (e.g., codes, standards and specifications) which have been met by the items; and, QAP 7.0 28 CYQAP REV: 01 s

o CY Oversight performs, as appropriate, on-site audits, surveillances, and inspections of the vendor activities. Proof tests, product acceptance tests, retests, and periodic surveillance tests are conducted by qualified personnel in accordance with procedures. Personnel performing tests ensure kt calibrated equipment and instrumentation utilized are within the calibration interval specified. Documentation including test procedures and data sheets are maintained in appropriate files. I1.2.2 TEST PROCEDURE PREPARATION AND TEST PERFORMANCE Testing is accomplished in accordance with test procedures which incorporate or reference the requirements and acceptance criteria in the applicable design and procurement documents. The test procedure or test program documents include the lbliowing as a minimum:

a. Instructions for the testing method used;

b. Required test equipment and instrumentation;

c. Test requirements, such as acceptance and rejection criteria;

d. Ilold, notification, inspection and data collection points;

c. Test prerequisites, such as: calibrated instrumentation; trained, qualified, and licensed or certified personnel; preparation, condition and completeness of the item to be tested; and/or suitable and controlled environmental conditions;

f. Methods for documenting or recording test data and results; an

g. Provisions for data collection and storage.

1i.2.3 TEST EOUIPMENT CY procedures provide the criteria for determining when a test is required and the accuracy requirements of test equipment. The following steps are taken in the control of test equipment:

a. Test instrumentation is checked and calibrated in accordance with CY procedures to ensure accuracy; QAP 11.0 39 CYQAP REV: 01 l

1

Calibration of this equipment should be against standards that have an accuracy of at least four times the required accuracy of the equipment being calibrated. When this is not possible, the standards shall have an accuracy that assures the gp c_quipment beinn calibrated udll beyithitLrequired tolerancejand the basis of Facceptance is documented and authorized by the m 'the applicable [ group or the PORC.Un addition, the calibrating suum ave greater ~accurac)Mondary standards being calibrated. Cah .andards with the same accuracy may be used if they can be shown to be adequme for the requirements and the basis of acceptance is documented. 12.2.3 "OUT OF TOI ERANCE" CONTROL M&TE and reference standards when found out of tolerance are so identified and removed from service. A timely review is conducted to determine the validity of previous inspection or test results gained through use of the instrument, and of the acceptability ofitems previously measured or tested. 1 QAP 12.0 43 CYQAP REV: 01 _d

APPENDIX A CONNECTICUT YANKEE OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM CATEGORY I SYSTEMS. STRUCTURES. AND COMPONENTS SEK INsteT* The following systems, structures and components of a defiled nuclear power plant, S including their foundations and supports, are designated as Category 1. The pertinent quality assurance requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B should be applied, as a minimum, to all i quality activities afecting the safety function of these systems, structures, and components as listed below and for those items listed in the CY UFSAR which addresses Section 3.2.1 of NRC Regulatory Guide 1.70. NOTE The safety classification of the systems, structures and components listed below may be e revised based on engineering evaluations and_ a revision to the C.Y UFSAR;ddring the ?

decommissioning processtLRevision of the safety classification in accordance~with the CYj

! Design Control process is not considered a reduction in the commitments to the CYQAPL (a) Systems or portions of systems that are required for cooling the spent fuel storage

pool, (b)

Cooling va:er and component cooling or portions of these systems including the intake structures, that are required for cooling the spent fuel storage pool. (c) Systems or portions of systems that are required o supply fuel for emergency equipment. (d) Systems or portions of a system of a defueled nuclear power plant that are required f_.: . Monitoring of systems safety-related functions; and, e Actuation of safety-related ftmetions. " Required for monitoring," i.e., Those parameters that provide information that is essential to permit the control room operator to take specific manually controlled actions for the direct accomplishment of the specified safety function. (c) The spent fuel storage pool structure, including the fuel racks. APPENDIX A 57 CYQAP REV: 01

INSERT A The pertinent quality assurance requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B will be applied, as a minimum, to all quality activities affecting the safety function of the systems, structures, and components (SSCs) of a defueled nuclear power plant, including their foundations and supports.These SSCs will be listed in Chapter 3.2 of the CY Defueled UFSAR and will address Section 3.2.1 of NRC Regulatory Guide 1.70. Typically, the SSCs required to support the long term storage of the spent nuclear l fuel for a defueled nuclear plant are as follows: NOTE The safety classification of the systems, structures and components may be revised based on engineering evaluations and a revision to the CY UFSAR during the decommissioning process, Revision of the safety classification in accordance with the CY Design Control process is not considered a reduction in the - commitments to the CYQAP.

.' Regulatory Guide 1.58 - Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel, Rev.1,9/80 - Endorses ANSI N45.2.6-1978. Regulatory Guide 1.64 - Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants, 6/76 Endorses AN'31 N45.2.11-1974.

Rmse, Id S GkT*

T e,nseod,?>- Se9 tw b

• I'75' 4

Regulatory Guide 1.70 "A Guide for the Organization and Content of Safety Analysis Reports" o QRevision ~ June 30,196pvas utilized for CY, however, certain revised sections of the CY UFSAR are written to the Revision 3 format. No new analyses have been performed which would be required by Revision 3. Regulatory Guide 1.88 Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plan' Ouality Assurance Records - 10/76 Endorses ANSI N45.2.9-1974. Regulatory Guide 1.94 - Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plant - i 4/76 - Endorses ANSI N45.2.5 - 1974 and Section 6.11 of ANSI N45.2.5 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.116 - Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, inspection, and Testing Mechanical Equipment and Systems - 5/77 - Endorus ANSI N45.2.8-1975. Regulatory Guide 1.123 - Quality Assurar.ce Requirements for Control of Procurement ofItems and Services for Nuclear Power Plants - 7/77 - Endorses ANSI N45.2.13-1976. Regulatory Guide 1.144 - Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants - Rev. I 1 - 9/80 Endorses ANSI N45.2.12 - 1977. l Regulatory Guide 1.146 - Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel For Nuclear Power Plants - 8/80 Endorses ANSI N45.2.23-1978. Regulatory Guide 1.152 " Criteria for Digital Computers in Safety Systems of Nuclear Power Plants," January 1996 - Endorses IEEE-ANS 7.4,3.2 - 1993. APPENDIX C 61 CYQAP REV: 01

Docket No. 50-213 CY-97-085 - i l Attachment C 6 Haddam Neck Plant Retvoed Pages of Additional Changes for Prooosed Revision 1 to the Quality Assurance Program ~ l l August 1997 d

V The Vice President provides management with objective evidence of the performance of activities affecting quality, independent of the individual - or group directly responsible for performing the specific activity, lie has the authority and organizational freedom to verify activities affecting quality. This is performed independent of undue influences and responsibilities for schedules and cost.e, lie has the responsibility and authority, delineated in writing, to step unsatisfactory work and control further processing, delivery, or insta' ation of nonconforming materials. Ile also has the responsibility and authority to identify quality problems, to recommend or provide solutions, and to verify their implementation. The Vice Presiden! - Nuclear Oversight is also responsible for the Employee Concerns Program, Independent Safety Engineering and l Operating Experience Program and the Audit program. Speciiically, the L key support activities for the Nuclear Oversight program at the liNP are provided by: 1 A.l.1 Director - Emnlovec Concerns The Director - Employee Concerns is responsible for the direction and a. ministration of the Employee Concerns Program for Northeast Utilities. The Director assures that nuclear safety concerns receive appropriate management attention and that concerns are addressed in a timely manner. 1.4,1.2 Director-Audits and Evaluation The Director - Audits and Evaluation is responsible for the direction and administration of the audit program to verify: compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix 13, other regulatory requirements; and implementation of the CYQAP requirements and evaluate performance. The Director provides support to the - CYQAP as described in the Nuclear Oversight Department - Procedures. 1.4.1.3 Director - Performance Evaluation The Director -_ performance Evaluation is responsible for the - direction and administration of the Nuclear Oversight program at the HNP as well as the other nuclear units within the NU system. At CY he is assisted by the the Manager - CY Oversight. QAP 1.0 3 CYQAP REV: 01

---

J

• .e 1 A.I.4 Manager - CY Ovenigitt The Manager - CY Oversight manages the audit, surveillance and inspection activities of the ilNP.

lie is responsible for:

a. Managing the Nuclear Oversight program ihr audits, surveillances and inspections;

b. Verifying compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and other regulatory requirements;

c. Verifying the implementation of the CYQAP requirements;

d. Evaluating performance and identification of strengths and weaknesses;

e. Providing recommendations for improving nuclear performance at IINP;

f. Serving as the primary NU Nuclear Oversight management interface with HNP management; and

(

g. Stop unsatisfactory work.

The Manager - CY Oversight is a member of the CY Nuclear Safety Assessment Board. The Manager-CY Oversight has direct communication to the CY staff, Directors and Executive Vice President and provides the daily interaction on matters affecting quality, nuclear safety, and nuclear related activities. 1.4.1.5 Mananer - Nuclear Safety Eneineerine The Manager-Nuclear Safety Engineering manages the day to-day activitier. of the Northeast Utilities Independent Safety Engineering Program and the Operating Experience Program in compliance with the appropriate unit Technical Specifications and licensing commitments. Operating Experience personnel are assigned to support the CY Oversight Manager. The Manager-Nuclear Safety Engineering provides technical direction for the CY Operating Experience activities. QAP 1,0 4 CYQAP REV: 01

The Manager Nuclear Safety Enginecting reports to the Nuclear Oversight Director-Analysis and Programs and ultimately to the Vice President Nuclear Oversight. These functions are located at the Millstone Point nuclear site and are dermed in the NUQ AP Topical Report. NOIE The Nuclear Oversight Organization is described in the Northeast Utilities Quality Assurance Program Topical Report (NUQAP). The specific functions within the Nuclear Oversight organization applied to the CYQAP are described herein. Additional support functions are provided on an as needed or as requested support basis. 1.4.2 - The Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer The CY EVP & CNO has the overall responsibility to implement the CYQAP at the llNP and in providing support services to the operating staff. 1.4.2.1 The Director Site Operations and Decommissioning (DSOD)is responsible for implementation of the CYQAP for the unit and is responsible for the IINP's safe operation. lie has control over those support activities necessary for safe operation, maintenance and decommissioning of the plant, lie has delegated the necessary authority and assigned responsibility for the management of these activities to the: 1.4.2.1.1 Unit Director The Unit Director is responsible for the direction and administration of the unit's Operations, Mechanical, Electrical, and I&C, Technical Specification Surveillance Planning and Scheduling, Security, Chemistry, Ilealth Physics, and Radwaste activities. The Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) reports to the Unit Director in compliance with Technical Specifications. 4 QAP 1.0 5 CYQAP REV: 01 a

., f 1.4.2.1.2 Engineering Director The Engineering Director is responsible for the administration of Unit Design Engineering, Radiation Protection Engineering, Engineering Programs, Configuration Management Program, and Licensing. Ile is responsible for maintaining the Design Dases in accordance with the Licensing Bases, lie is also responsible for regulatory compliance; commitment management; self assessment and corrective action programs administration. 1.4.2.1.3 Business ManaEcr The Business Manager is responsible for managing and coordinating the fmancial reporting and control functions for CYAPCO during decommissioning. lie oversees materials, inventory reduction and salvage and the administration of contracts. l.4.2.1,4 Decommissioning Protect Manager The Decommissioning Project Manager is responsible for the overall management of work planning and scheduling for unit operations, decommissioning, demolition, and dismantling activities. CAP 1.0 6 CYQAP REV: 01

2.2.5 INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING A program is established and maintained for quality assurance indoctrination and training which provides confidence that the required level of personnel competence and skill is achieved and maintained in the perfonnance of quality activities. Quality procedures delineate the requirements for an indoctrination program to assure that personnel responsible for performing quality activities are instructed in the purpose, scope, and implementation of quality procedures and instructions and that compliance to these documents is mandatory. Each CY Director is responsible for ensuring appropriate indoctrination and training of assigned personnel performing quality activities. Nuclear training programs shall be developed and implemented to provide training for individuals attached to or associated with the 1INP. Additional guidance is established in procedures, implementing procedures describe the nuclear training program requirements which assure that: l Documentation of formal training and qualification piograms includes the objective, content of the program, attendees, date of attendance, and examination results, as applicable; Proficiency of personnel performing and verifying activities affecting quality is established and maintained. Personnel proficiency is established and maintained by training, examination / testing, and/or certification based upon the requirements of the activity. Acceptance criteria are dewloped to determine ifindividuals are properly trained and qualified; and Certificates or other documentation of qualification clearly delineate the specific functions personnel are qualified to perform and the criteria used to qualify personnelin each function. 2.2.6 MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT OF THE OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM The CY Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer ensures that a management review of the CY Quality Assurance Program is conducted annually to assess the effectiveness of the QA program. This is accomplished by performing an independent assessment of the program. In addition, the CY Nuclear Safety Assessment Board performs an oversight of the program in accordance with the approved charter. Results of the assessments and reports are forwarded to the Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer and the Vice President-Nuclear Oversight for appropriate corrective action, as necessary. QAP 2.0 11 CYQAP REV: 01

,QAP7.0 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL. EQUIPMENl', AND SERVICES 7,1 GENERAL REOUIREMENTS Measures for the control of procured material, equipment, parts and senices by or for CY related to the safety ofnuclear power plants are established and imposed by the CYQAP during maintenance and modification to the llNP to ensure conformance to procurement documents. These measures include provisions for source evaluation and selection, submission of objective evidence by the contractor or subcontractor, inspection at the vendor source and examination ofitems upon delivery, Control ofquality by vendors and j subcontractors is assessed for effectiveness at intervals consistent with the importance, complexity and quantity of the product or service, 7.2 IMPI EMENTATION I The evaluation and selection of vendors is performed in accordance with procedures, which specify that procurement source evaluation and selection measures are performed to - determine vendor capability and delineate responsibilities of qualified personnel involved in the evaluation and selection process. 7.2,1 VENDOR OUALIFICATIONS l Nuclear Materials and Document Management utilizes one or more of the - l following methods in J"ating the qualifications of a potential vendor: I

a. Audits and/or coordinated review of a potential vendor utilizing NU/CY personnel and/or YAEC personnel;

b. Other utility vendor audits and evaluations;

c. Nuclear Procurement issues Committee (NUPIC) audits;

d. ASME N NA', NPT, NV, or MM/ MS Certificate of Authorization;

e. Commercial grade surveys and/or coordinated review of a potential vendor utilizing one or more departments, (i.e., Engineering, Operations and/or Purchasing); or f Vendorinspection/ surveillance.

QAP 7.0 26 CYQAP-REV: 01

Evaluations ensure that vendors employ a quality assurance program that conforms to applicable portions of the NUQAP Topical Report and/or the CYQAP. Nuclear hiaterials and Document hianagement is responsible for maintaining l documented evidence of the evaluation and acceptance of the vendor's quality assurance program. The determination of vendor approval is based on such factors as prior perfonnance, quality performance data, audits, commercial grade surveys, surveillances and evaluations of the supplier's quality assurance program. I Vendors' Certincates of Confomiance are periodically evaluated by audits, commercial grade surveys, surveillances, independent inspections and tests, to assure they are valid. This verincation of Certincates of Conformance is documented. 7.2.2 SOURCE INSPECTION Nuclear hiaterials and Document hianagement is responsible for the perfomiance ] of source inspections at suppliers' facilities to ensure that the requirements of a Purchase Order / Contract have been met. Source inspections are performed in accordance with procedures which provide for the method ofinspection, the extent of documentation required, and those responsible for implementing those instructions. 1 Inspection ofitems occurs either when verincations of procurement requirements cannot be determined upon receipt or the vendor's QA program has not been I accepted by Nuclear hiaterials and Document hianagement. l Nuclear hiaterials and Document hianagement has contracted the performance of the vendor source inspection function to the Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) in accordance with the NUQAP Topical Report. CY has accepted the NU vendor QA process described in the NUQAP Topical Report based on audits performed to accept the YAEC process. 7.2.3 RECEIPT INSPECTION Receipt inspection for procured items is performed by Nuclear hiaterials and Document hianagement in accordance with quality procedures which delineate requirements and responsibilities necessary to perform inspection functions. An exception to this is Chemistry performing receipt inspection for diesel fuel in accordance with CY procedures. Contractual obligation fulnllment and specined requirements are verined during receipt inspections. QAP 7.0 27 CYQAP REV: 01

Receipt inspection of vendor furnished material and equipment is performed to assure that material, components, equipment and acceptance records are examined in accordance with predetermined inspection instructions prior to acceptance, installation and operation. Receipt inspections include, as appropriate:

a. Measures for verifying that the shipment is complete, properly identified, undamaged and corresponds with the required documentation;

b. Measures for inspection of the item and review of supporting documentation (e.g., mill test reports, NDE reports) as required by the purchase documents;

c. Measures for inspection and acceptance ofitems in accordance with predetennined methods;

d. Measures for identifying and controlling acceptable items including identification ofinspection status prior to release from the receipt inspection area; l

e. Measures for identifying, segregating and handling nonconforming items; i

i

f. Measures to ascertain that inspection records or certificates of conformance are acceptable prior to release for installation; and/or

g. In cases involving procurement of senices, the project engineer or department head shall designate the means by which services may be accepted, and is given the authority to accept senices in accordance with methods defined in NU or CY procedures.

7.2.4 VENDOR FURNISHED RECORDS Records required to be furnished by the vendor are specified in the procurement document. Certifications or documentation provided by the supplier which attests to conformance, identifies that all the specific procurement requirements have been met (either by reference to the purchase order or by delineation). The vendor must furnish the following records as a minimum:

a. Documentation that identifies the purchased material or equipment and the specific procurement requirements. (e.g., codes, standards and specifications) which have been met by the items; and, QAP 7.0 28 CYQAP REV: 01

e CY Oversight performs, as appropriate, on site audits, surveillances, and inspections of the vendor activities. Proof tests, product acceptance tests, retests, and periodic surveillance tests are conducted by quali0ed personnel in accordance with procedures. Personnel performing tests ensure that calibrated equipment and instrumentation utilized are within the calibration interval specified. Documentation including test procedures and data sheets are maintained in appropriate files. I1.2.2 TEST PROCF,IlURE PREPAllATION AND TESUERFORMANCE Testing is accomplished in accordance with test procedures which incorporate or reference the requirements and acceptance criteria in the applicable design and procurement documents, 'lhe test procedure or test program documents include the following as a minimum: a, Instructions for the testing method used; b, Required test equipment and instrumentation;

c. Test requirements, such as acceptance and rejection criteria;

d. Ilold, notincation,insnection and data collection points;

c. Test prerequisites, such as: calibrated instrumentation; trained, qualified, and licensed or certified per:onnel; preparation, condition and completeness of the item to be tested; and/or suitable and controlled environmental conditions;

f. Methods for documenting or recording test data and results; and

g. Provisions (br data collection and storage.

11.2.3 IEST EOUIPMENT Ci procedures provide the criteria for determining when a test is required and the accuracy requirements of test equipment. The following steps are taken in the control of test equipment:

a. Test instrumentation is checked and calibrated in accordance with CY procedures to ensure accuracy; QAP 11.0 39 CYQAP REV: 01

O 4 9 Calibration of this equipment should be against standards that have an accuracy of at least Ibut times the required accuracy of the equipinent being calibrated. When this is not possible, the standards shall have an accuracy that assures the equipment being calibrated will be within required tolerance and the basis of acceptance is documented and authorized by the manager of the applicable group or the pORC. In addition, the calibrating standards shall have greater accuracy than secondary standards being calibrated. Calibrating standards with the same accuracy may be used if they can be shown to be adequate for the requirements and the basis of acceptance is documented. 12.2.3 "OUT OF TOLEllANCE" CONTROL M&TE and reference standards when found out of toleraree are so identined and removed from service. A timely review is conducted to determine the validity of previous inspection or test results gained through use of the instrument, and of the l acceptability ofitems previously measured or tested, l l QAP 12.0 43 CYQAP REV: 01

MPENDIX A CONNECTICUT YANKlili OUAI.lTY ASSURANCI' PROGRAhi CATEGDitY I SYSTEh1S. STRUCTURES. AND COhiPONENTS The pertinent quality assurance requirements of 10 CFil 50, Appendix 11 will be applied, as a minimum, to all quality activities affecting the safety function of the systems, structures, and components (SSCs) of a defueled nuclear power plant, including their foundations and supports /lhese SSCs will be listed in Chapter 3.2 of the CY Defueled UFSAR and will address Section 3.2.1 of NRC Regulatory Guide 1.70. Typically, the SSCs required to support the long term storage of the spent nuclear fuel for a defueled nuclear plant are as follows: NOTl; ~1he safety classification of the systems, structures and components may be revised based on engineering evaluations and a revision to the CY UFSAR during the decommissioning proecss. Revision of the safety classification in accortlance with the CY Design Control process is not considered a reduction in the commitments to the CYQAP. (a) Systems or portions of systems that are required for cooling the spent fuel storage pool. (b) Cooling water and compment cooling or portions of these systems including the intake stmetures, that are required for cooling the spent fuel storage pool. (c) Systems or ponions of systems that are required to supply fuel for emergency equipment. (d) Systems or portions of a system of a defueled nuclear power plant that are required for: e hionitoring of systems safety related functions; and, e Actuation of safety-related functions. " Required for monitoring," i.e., Those parameters that provide infomiation that is essential to permit the control room operator to take specific manually controlled actions for the direct accomplishment of the specified safe.y function. (e) The spent fuel storage pool structure, including the fuel racks. APPENDIX A 57 CYQAP REV: 01

, Repulatory Guide 1.58 - Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant inspection, I!xamination, and Testing Personnel, Rev.1,9/80 Endorses ANSI N45.2.6-1978. Regulatory Guide 1,64 - Quality Assurance Requirements lbr the Design of Nuclear Power Plants, 6/76 lindorses ANSI N45.2.11-1974. Regulatory Guide 1.70 "A Guide Ibr the Organization and Content of Safety Analysis Reports" Revision 2, September.1975 was utilized for CY, however, certain revised sections of the CY UI'SAR are written to the Revision 3 lbnnat. No new analyses have been performed which would be required by Revision 3. Regulatory Guide 1.88 Collection, Storage, and hiaintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records 10/76 Endorses ANSI N45.2.91974. Regulatory Guide 1.94 - Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, inspection and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plant - 4/76 - Endorses ANSI N45.2.5 1974 and Section 6.11 of ANSI N45.2.5-1978. Regulatory Gaide 1.116 - Quality Assurance Requirements fbr Installation, inspection, and Testing hiechanical Equipment and Systems - 5/77 Endorses ANSI N45.2.81975. Regulatory Guide 1.123 - Quality Assurance Rcquirements for Control of Procurement ofitems and Services fbr Nuclear Power Plants - 7/77 Endorses ANSI N45.2.131976. Regulatory Guide 1.144 - Auditing of Quality Arsurance Programs Ihr Nuclear Poiver Plants - Rev. 1 - 9/80 Endorses ANSI N45.2.12 - 1977. Regulatory Guide 1.146 - Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel For Nuclear Pov,cr Plarits - 8/80 Endorses ANSI N45.2.23. !978. Regulatory Guide 1.152 " Criteria lbr Digital Computers in Safety Systems of Nuclear Power Plants," January 1996 - Endorses IEEE ANS 7.4.3.2 - 1993. APPENDlX C 61 CYQAP REV: 01 J -}}