ML20137C628
| ML20137C628 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone, Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/14/1997 |
| From: | NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20057G453 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9703250066 | |
| Download: ML20137C628 (22) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:! Docket Nos. 50-213
, 50-245 50-336 ,
50-423 I B16328 1 t l Attachment 4 Haddam Neck Plant Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Units 1,2, and 3 Redacted Version March 1997
- 8188n3588)iaa V "
d Nuclear Training LOIT/ LOUT Audit Reviews I 4 l l 1 l l l l l l Created by: Reviewed by: Approved by: Page1of21 Revision 1 March 14,1997 1
l 1 Background l Following the most recent Millstone Unit One Licensed Operator Initial Training (LOIT) class, in which 6 of the 7 candidates failed the NRC exam, Training management commissioned an independent root cause team (IRT) to examine this event. The subject NRC examination occurred during the week of December 2,1996. The IRT assembled and began their investigation during the week of January 6,1997. l 1 As part of the IRT review, a records review of each student that participated in the NRC examination was performed. This review revealed that, in several cases, the required facility training for a Reactor / Senior Reactor Operator had not been completed. The requirements for j completion of the LOI T class were, in part: a set of on-the-job training (OJT) cards,5 reactivity ' manipulations for Reactor Operators and Instant Senior Reactor Operators, and a specified number of hours of under-instruction watchstanding. Once these deficiencies were identified, it was decided to broaden the scope of the audit to include both Licensed Operator Initial Training (LOIT) and Licensed Operator Upgrade Training (LOUT) classes at all four units. An independent audit review was commissioned by Training management to undertake this task. This audit team was assembled and began audit activities on January 30,1997. 1 Scope The initial scope of the audit review was to perform a detailed records review of the following license classes:
. Millstone Unit One 1996 LOUT e Millstone Unit One 1995 LOIT
. Millstone Unit Two 1996 LOUT e Millstone Unit Two 1996 LOIT
. Millstone Unit Three 1995 LOIT
- Connecticut Yankee 1996 LOIT/ LOUT Based on the initial findings of the audit review, it was decided to expand the scope of the audit review to include the following license classes:
. Millstone Unit One 1993/94 LOIT/ LOUT
. Millstone Unit Two 1994 LOIT
. Millstone Unit Two 1994 LOUT
. Millstone Unit Three 1993/94 LOIT Connecticut Yankee 1994 LOIT/ LOUT A complete listing of the target classes reviewed for each unit can be found in Attachment 1.
Page 2 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
l l Objective: j To determine whether the program requirements in place at the time oflicense classes were ; satisfied prior to submittal of the NRC 398 forms. Audited Items l l The following items were evaluated during this audit: l l
. Required prerequisites completed '
. Under-instruction watches completed
. Reactivity manipulations completed l
. Required OJT completed l The criteria used for determining successful completion of above items are explained in detail later in this document.
- Non-Audited Items The following items were NOT evaluated during this audit
. SAT-based program
. Training classroom / simulator attendance Process The first step in the process was to determine the Training Program requirements which existed
' at the time the courses were conducted. This determination was made by comparing the approval dates for the governing documents to the time frames for each of the license classes being audited. A matrix (see Attachment 2) was developed which shows the completion requirements and prerequisites required by each of the governing documents for each program (LOIT/ LOUT) at each of the four units. The governing documents include:
. 10 CFR 55
. NUREG 1021
. Training Program Implementing Procedure Training Program Description (unique to each class at each facility)
Signed copies of the actual NRC 398 forms submitted to the Commission were obtained from records and/or from the Commission. These forms were reviewed to detennine the actual date of submittal which was used as the cut-off date for training requirement completion. Each of the goveming documents were reviewed to determine the expected data for each license class. License candidate records were then reviewed for the actual data. A comparison between actual and expected data was then conducted. These comparisons were then represented on a matrix for each license class. A typical requirements summary matrix is represented in Attachment 3. Page 3 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
i !Y Il s Each audit for each license class was conducted separately due to the varying criteria in place for l j each license class at each of the four units over the large time-frame under consideration. Each j license class audit is represented on a separate matrix. Deviations between actual and expected data were re-examined and supporting documentation j was obtained, where available: Where these deviations could not be explained, or resolved, the l Training Department met with Operations management and determined a course of action for the j subject license. j l - l Summary of Discrepancies
- j. During the audit process, the audit team members kept a running log of the potential j discrepancies for each candidate. Individual student summary sheets (see Attachment 8) were
! prepared for each candidate. The student summary sheets list all of the issues associated with each candidates license, and include space for management disposition as well as review and ! approval signatures. i 1 1 a i i i Y Page 4 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
Specific Audit Criteria Prerequisites The prerequisites required for successful completion of each license class were determined from the reviews of the governing documents and are shown on the prerequisites matrix for each license class. Prerequisites were verified by researching the data contained in the candidates' individual training records. A typical prerequisites matrix is represented in Attachment 4. Shaded blocks in the matrix are not required for that candidate, "XXX" in a box indicates that the candidate fully satisfied that particular requirement. Note # in a box indicates that the candidate did not fully satisfy that particular requirement. The corresponding Note # at the bottom of the page provides clarifying information on requirements not fully met. Notes shown on the matrix in " RED", indicate a discrepancy with the candidate's NRC Form 398. Notes shown in black denote programmatic and/or student issues not affecting the candidates license. Under-instruction watches Under-instruction watches were verified using the following sources: Trainees' records of on-shift time Shift Manager's Log (as necessary) Shift Turnover Sheets (as necessary) Control Room security access logs (as necessary) The information obtained from each of the above sources was cross checked against the other two sources (when available) to provide reasonable assurance of the accuracy of the data in each source. Detennination of reactor power levels for the time periods that under-instruction watches were stood was determined from the trainees records of on-shift time when available. In some instances when no power level was recorded in the trainees' records, the Shift Manager's Log and/or reactor power history records were accessed to determine the power level. When necessary to provide complete data, a matrix (Attachment 5) was developed for each license class being audited. Each matrix contains the following attributes: Dates on which trainees stood watches under instruction. Number of under instruction hours stood on each date. Differentiates between under instruction hours stood with the plant above and below 20% power. Differentiates between source documents used to obtain number of hours under instruction credited to each trainee. Differentiates between under instruction hours stood prior to, and after submittal of the NRC 398 forms. Page 5 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
V 4 Reactivity manipulations l All reactivity manipulations were reviewed and validated. The results are shown on the
" Reactivity Control Manipulation Matrix"(Attachment 6). The matrix includes the following l concerning reactivity manipulations:
I
. Number loceed
. Number available.(based on evolution (s) perfomied as recorded in the Shift
, Manager's Log and shown at the top of the matrix) 1
- e Number actually credited based on this audit 3
Number which etcceded the number available 1
- Each reactivity manipulation signed off on the Reactivity Manipulation Individual Tracking Log l was listed by date, individual performing the manipulation, and the type of manipulation.
Attachment 7 is a representation of a typical worksheet used. The compiled list of reactivity
- manipulations was checked for the following
) . To determine if an individual took credit for more than one manipulation of the same
- t.me without a turnover on any given day. If an individual recorded more than one i
reactivity manipulation of the same type on any given day, without a turnover, the ! extra reactivity manipulations were not credited to that trainee. (Not applicable to l; CY, for historical reasons, explained in detail later in this document.)
. Plant evolutions performed on specific dates were reviewed to determine the maximum number of reactivity manipulations available to all of the trainees. The } number of available manipulations were compared to the number of reactivity 1
manipulations lagged on any given day to determine the number of reactivity { manipulations that could be credited for that particular day. If the number of credited manipulations exceeded the number of available manipulations, the number ofexcess
; evolutions were recorded on the matrix.
i e j In some cases, power level information, from Reactor Plant Engineering, was
- reviewed to determine actual power level changes to determine the number of j reactivity manipulations available on the specific dates in question. Since some of the required reactivity manipulations specify that power level must be changed by 4
, >5%
4 i 1 , Page 6 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
Criteria for Crediting Trainees With Reactivity Manipulations The following constitute reactivity control manipulations: Reactor startups to include the attainment of criticality (1 person per event). Reactor control from point of criticality to the Point of Adding Heat (1 person per event). Reactor shutdown froin criticality to insertion of all control rods (1 person per event). Manual control of Recirculation Flow during plant power changes of greater than or equal to 5% of full load (1 person per 5% load change). Manual control of Steam Generator water level during low power conditions, including startup and shutdown, where power level is less than 20% of full load (1 person per 5% load change OR 1 person per 4-hour period if no power change). Reactivity changes to compensate for xenon buildup or burnout using control rods and boration or dilution (PWR) or recirculation flow and control rods (BWR) (1 person per 4-hour period). Boration or dilution control during a power change of greater than or equal to 5% of full load (1 person per 5% load change). Manual rod control during a power change of greater than or equal to 5% of full load (1 person per 5% load change). Reactor power change greater than or equal to 5% of full load using turbine control (PWR only)(1 person per 5% load change). The manipulation is performed by the candidate (not observed, not supervised -- 10CFR55 , requirement). The manipulation is dated and signed by a licensed Control Room watchstander. Single power changes were credited as multiple manipulations if the candidate performed on different reactivity control stations (make-up control, rods, or turbine) for greater than or equal to 5% at EACII station. Single power changes were credited as multiple manipulations on a single reactivity control station if a turnover occurred AND is documented (i.e., rotated from turbine control to rods & make-up control then back to turbine control). Page 7 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
For MP1, and MP3, single power changes of 5% to 100% were counted as anc manipulation if performed at the same reactivity control station (turbine, rods and make-up) without a documented turnover. For example operation at the Turbine Control for a 30% power change and documented as 100% > 90%,90% -> 80%,80% -> 70% was counted as 1 manipulation HQI3. Basis: MPl program guidance specifically prohibits counting one power change as multiple manipulations (as in the example), while the program documents do not address the issue. For CY, single changes between 10% and 100% were counted as multiple manipulations (in 10% increments) even at the same reactivity control station, given proper signatures and dates. Basis: written historical and reconstructed evidence of a formal policy specifically allowing / promoting this practice has been identified. While differing from the MP1 standard, this policy does not appear to be inherently " wrong" and will be allowed. For MP2, single changes between 0% and 100% were counted as multiple manipulations (in 5% increments) even at the same reactivity control station, given proper signatures and dates. Basis: the class trainees were given verbal direction specifically allowing / promoting this practice. A decrease in power of 5% or more followed by an increase in power of at least 5% (or vice-versa) as part of the same evolution performed from the same reactivity control station was counted as 2 manipulations. A decrease in power ofless than 5% followed by an increase in power ofless than 5% (or vice-versa) was counted as one reactivity manipulation if the total power change (increase + decrease) was 5% or greater. Required OJT Completion of required OJT cards was verified by researching the data contained in the candidates' individual training records. Discrepancies were noted on the summary matrix. OJT completion was determined using one of the following methods: Direct verification from complete package provided to the audit team Nuclear Department Assistants (NDAs), under direct guidance from the review team, reviewed the microfilm records in the nuclear records vault and provided a list of discrepancies to the audit team. In cases where NDAs were utilized to review records in the nuclear records vault, they were provided a list of the required OJT cards by the audit team. The NDAs then reviewed the microfilm records for completeness (e.g., all required signatures and dates recorded on the OJT cards). When the NDAs discovered a discrepancy with a particular OJT card for a license candidate, they recorded the OJT card and discrepancy on a matrix and made a copy of the page(s) in question. The list of discrepancies and copies of the associated pages of the OJT cards were then delivered to the audit team for review / disposition. Page 8 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
Attachment 1 -- Target Classes Millstone Unit One 1996 LOUT - Initial scope Candidate l License Type License Status:- SRO(I) None SRO(U) Current (RO) SRO(I) None SRO(l) None I SRO(U) Current (RO) SRO(U) Current (RO) SRO(l) None Millstone Unit One 1995 L.OIT - Initial Scope Candidate'- License Type l- : License Status - SRO(I) None SRO(U) Current RO Current RO Current RO Current RO Current Millstone Unit One 1993/94 LOIT/ LOUT - Expanded Scope Candidate: License Type - License Status RO Current SRO(U) None RO Current RO Current SRO(1) Current SRO(R) Current SRO Cunent SRO Current RO Current SRO(R) Current RO Current Millstone Unit Two 1996 LOUT - Initial Scope Candidate - License Type ~ License Status . SRO(U) Current SRO(U) Current SRO(U) Current SRO(U) Current Page 9 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
^ !
Millstone Unit Two 1996 LOIT -- Initial Scope i Candidate - -License Type r License Status:+. l SRO(I) Current ! RO Current l SRO(I) Current l RO Current j SRO(1) Current i SRO(I) Current RO Cunent l RO Current SRO(I) Current RO None l RO Current j RO Current ! ! Millstone Unit Two 1994 LOIT - Expanded Scope Candidate License Type - License Status t RO Cunent RO Current i RO Current RO Cunent Millstone Unit Two 1994 LOUT - Expanded Scope Candidate ' License Type e License Status:: SRO Current SRO Current
- Millstone Unit Three 1995 LOIT --Initial Scope Candidate . License Type - License Status SRO(U) Current i RO Current
! RO Current l RO Current , SRO Current RO Cunent i SRO(U) Cunent SRO(I) Current SRO(U) Current SRO(I) Not Current Page 10 of 21 Revision 1
- March 14,1997
4 Millstone Unit Three 1993/94 LOIT - Expanded Scope Candidate c . License Type-a License Status: RO Current ! RO Current l RO Current RO Current RO Current Connecticut Yankee 1996 LOIT/ LOUT - Initial Scope Candidate - LicenseTypei License Statusi RO Current RO Current
- SRO(I) None RO Currerit SRO(U) None RO None SRO(U) None
- SRO(I) None
- i SRO(U) None RO None SRO(I) None RO None i
- Connecticut Yankee 1994 LOIT/ LOUT-- Expanded Scope Candidate License Type? License Status >
SRO(U) None a SRO(U) None l RO Current l 2 SRO(U) None RO None j RO None
- RO Current SRO(I) None
) RO None RO Current 1 Page 11 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
I Attachment 2 - Program Prerequisites / Completion Matrix Document Approval / Unit Program Prerequisites Completion i Date
'I PIP Rev.0 All LOl l' . Non-Licensc Qual (6.2.4.1) + f ull Attendance (6.l.6.1) '
NTM.3.078 12/25/93 . Reference 3.4, NUREG 102I (6.2.4.2) . 520 hours on. shift (w/ 240 hrs. >20%) as required by Reference 3 4, i (7.078) . Unit Specific TPD (6.2.4J) NUREG 102I (6.1.6.2) i
. NRC GFES (6.2.6.1) . 5 reactisity manipulations (6.1.6J)
. Prior to 398 Submittal 13 Weeks of 03T (6.2.6J)
TPIP Rev.I All LOUI . Unit Director (6.2J) . Full Attendance (6.l.6.1) ! NTM-3.079 2/9/95 . Licensed 1 Year on Unit (6.2.4.1) . UI to satisfy SAT and Technical Specifications (6.l.6.2) (7.079) . Eligible NUREG 1021 (6.2.4.2) . OJT complete prior to 398 submittal (6.2.6.2)
. Additional TPD requirements (6.2.4J)
. GFES (6.2.6.1)
MPI IPIP Rev.2 MP1 LOI l' . As Defined in Program Description (6.2J) . N/A ! NTM-3.026 9/21/89 i MPI 'I PD Rev:3 MPI LOl l' + 2 Years Power Plant Experience (1 Yr Nuclear . N/A NTM-3.026 t/23/90 Power Plant,6 months at MPI)(3.1.1) ,
. Con:pleted MPI PEO Qualifications (3.1.2) I
. StafTLicenses complete PEO OJT Cards as defined by TPCC. (3.1J) t i
i I t L I i i i Page 12 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997 i
._..-m---~_--._._ - - . --- --. _ - - .- ~ ...._ m._ - ._._m ....-__-m.m._._m_.m m-.m_ . . - _..
'i Ikeumcat Approval / Omit Program Prerequisites Completion i Date 6 MPI SROIl'
- 4 year degree in engineering or applied science
- N/A I LOUT (3.2.1) .
. 2 years responsible nuclear power plant experience (may be statTengineer)(3.2.I.I) [
- Minimum 6 months at MPI (3.2.1.2) +
+ Ops Dept Candidates shall have completed PEO Qualification (3.2.1J)
. All other candidates shall have completed applicable portions of PEO OJT cards as directed by TPCC (3.2.1.4) .
. . Without 4 year degree must have: (3.2.2)
- Minimum of 4 Yr responsible power plant experience as a Control Room Operator (2 years . l
^
must be nuclear)(3.2.2.I) !
+ Licensed RO at same facility I year (any of following): (3.2.2.2)
- MPI Licensed RO I Year e Licensed RO or SRO at another facility for at least i year
- Navy Nuclear (PPWO. EOOW, PPWS, ERS,
-{
RO.CRW)
- Program Prerequisites may be waived by Validation of Equivalent Training i e Ops Dept shall complete PEO quals (3.2.2.3)
. StatT PEO OJT detmed by TPCC. (3.2.2.4)
MPIl'PD Rev.3 MPI 1.01l' = 3 yrs. power plant expenence = 13 weeks (65 days)on shilt pnor to 398 submittal (6.8.1 and 6.8.2) NTM 3.026 3/2/95 (w/ I yr. at MPI)(3.1.1) e 20% of OJT signed by management (6.8.4) t
+ 6 months as PEO (3.1.2) e RO position for RO (6.8J) i e GFES prior to completion (3.l.3)
- 5 reactivity manipulations (6.8.7) !
e liigh school diploma OR GED F3.I.4) e Evaluated by Ops or Tmg performing 50% of all in. plant JPMs (6.8.5) j ~ MPl SROIl'
- 4 yrs. power plant experience (2 yrs. nuclear)(6 e 13 weeks (65 days) on-shift prior to 398 submittal (6.8.1 and 6.8.2) i weeks RO power levels greater than 20*'. - may . 20% ofOJT signed by management (6.8.4)
- . be part of board time)(3.2.1) . SRO position for SRO (6.8.3)
- I 3r. MPI RO or equivalent (3.2.2) + 5 reactivity manipulations (6.8.7)
- 6 months at MPI (3.2.3) ,
- e GFES (3.2.4)
- Ifigh school diploma OR GED (3.2.5) t
'l ' s Page 13 of 21 Revision 1
- March 14,1997
Document Approval / t!ait Program Prerequisites Comp 4ction I sie MPl 'I PD Rev.O MPI LOUf = Unit Utrector, ANSI N18.1-1971 NUREG 1021
- 4 weeks (20 days) OJ I (8 hour shift minimum) 6/10/96 and LOUT TPIP (3.0) + While assigned to training - 6 weeks >20% power may be completed
. 4 Yrs Responsible Power Plan Experience (2 of after conclusion of LOUT prior to issuing licenses. (3.6 and Ill. On 4 Nucicar)(3.1) Shift Training)
. Performed RO Duties MPI I Yr or (1021 + SRO position for OJT (6.8.2) s criteria)(3.2) . Students uill be evaluated w hile performing at least 5% of all in-Plant
- . 6 months at MPI (3.3) JPMs. (6.8.4)
- NRC GFES (3.4) . Instant SRos - 5 reactivity manipulations (6.8.6) e fligh School Diploma or GED (3.5)
- Due to plant shutdown all ISRO 6 weeks >20% following NRC 4
License Examination (6.8.6) MP2 'l PD Rev.O MP2 LolI e I11C input with final selection t>y Unit Director
- 13 weeb on shift (Ill.)
NTM 3.078 3/30/94 (3.0)
- On shift time completed prior to 398 submittal (lit.)
. Tech Spec 63 (Iligh School diploma OR GED,2
- Certified as successfully completing LOIT program if Training courses
> cars power plant experience, I > car nuclear) completed and pass Final Simulator Exam, Written Exam, and in-Plant (3.0) JPMs (5.0)
SROIl' = 1PCC input with final selection by Un:t Director e Same as LOlI (3.0)
. Tech Spec 63 (Iligh School diploma or GED,4 years power plant. I years nuclear (3.0)
MP2 'l PD Rev.I MP2 LOUT
- Selected by Unit 2 Director (3.0)
- Day l-65 on shift (5.0)
LOUT 93-I 93-1 . 4 yrs. power plant experience (2 yrs. nuclear) (6 months on unit)(3.1)
= I yr RO at MP2 (4 yr. engineering or applied science degree)(3.2)
+ liigh school diploma OR GED f3.3)
MP21PD Rev.0 ' MP2 LOl1 -
- 1 PCC input with linal selection by Unit Director
- 13 weeks on shift (lit.)
NTM-7.051 3/31/95 95/96 (3.0)
- On shift time completed prior to 398 submittal (Ill.)
. Tech Spec 63 (Iligh School diploma OR GED,2 + Certified as successfully completing LOIT program if Training courses years power plant experience, ! year nuclear) completed and pass Final Simulator Exam, Written Exam, and in-Plant (3.0) JPMs (5.0)
SROI l'
- 1 PCC input with tinal selection by Unit Director
- Same as LO!r (3.0) a e Tech Spec 63 (Iligh School diploma or GED,4 years power plant, I years nucicar(3.0)
MP2 'I PD Rev.I MP2 LOUT
- Selected by Unit 2 Director (3.0)
- Day I-50 on shift (5.0) 3/2N5 . 4 )rs. power plant experience (2 yrs. nuclear) (6 months on unit)(3.1)
- I yr. RO at MP2 (4 yr. engineering or applied science degree)(3.2) e fligh school diploma OR GED (3.3)
MP3 IPD Rev.I MP3 LOlI e Selected by Unit Director (3.0)
- On-'I he-Job Trainmg,4 weeks, self paced (Ill.)
NTM-3.078 6/29/89
- Fully qualified PEOs per NB1-3.077 (3.1) e GFES (3.2)
Page 14 Of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
Docur.at Approval / Unit Program Prerequisites Connpletion i Date ! MP3 'l PD Rev.2 MP3 LOU l'
- Selected by Umt Director (3.0)
- On-The-Job 1 raining. 7 weeks, sell paced NTM-3.079 7/30N2 . Fully qualified Control Room Operators (3.0) . ES-202 requires minimum of 13 weeks can be completed prior to, during, or after the LOUT program.
MP3 IPD Rev.2 MP3 LOII + Selected by Unit Director (3.0)
- Completion of $20 hours UI, completion of applicable watchstation NTM-3.078 10/2/96
- Fully Qualified PEO per NTM 3.077 (3.1.I) OJT Guide (RO, Inst SRO)(Ill.) - i e NUREG 1021, ES-202 Eligibility (3 yrs e 520 hours on shift as RO/DOP(Ill.A) ;
reponsible power plant, I of 3 years at MP3,6
- 5 reactivity manipulations NUREG 1021. ES-202 (III.D.I.d) months PEO at MP3, Iligh School Diploma or
- Training must be completed and NRC Form 398 signed by senior GED)(3.I.2) management and submitted to NRC at least 14 days prior to
+ GFES (3.I.3) esamination date. (5.20)
. TPCC input (3.1.4) i SROII e SRO LO!I checkt st (3.2.1)
- 520 hours under instructson as RO, HOP, SM, US, & SRO w/ majority
. NUREG 1021, ES-202 (unless waiver IAW ES. as US (Ill.A) .
104, NTM l.16 NTM Deviation)(3.2.2,3.3,3.4)
- Completion of applicable watchstation OJT Guide (RO, Inst SRO) j
- GFES (3.2.3) (III.)
- 5 reactivity manipulations (Ill.D.I.d)
. Training complete prior to 398 submittal (5.20)
CYIPD Rev.5 CY Loll' + NSO qual: lied (3.1.1)
- 13 weeks on shift (3.3.1) 12/1/93
- Completeissued AOcards(3.I.2) = 5 reactivity manipulations (3.3.2) i
- I year on site ANSI N18.l.1971 (3.13) e Complete control manipulations of Fig. 7.2 ofTPIP (3.33) !
- GFES (3.2.1)
SRolI e Complete Non-Operator fraining Guide (Staff . Same as LOli only) (3.1.4) . CY 'l PD Rev.6 CY LOUI + 4 yrs. responsible power plant expetience, + 13 weeks on shift under direction of SRO (3.2.1) I/25/94 includes: (3.1.1) . Complete Supervisory sLills / Admin. training courses (3.2.2)
+ 1 Scar as licensed RO any facility (3.1.1.1) . Supervision and direction of controls during 5 reactivity changes as
. Military Experience (EOOW, EWS, RO) one for defined in LORT (3.23) one basis (3.1.1.2) ,
. Navy Nuclear Power School and Prototype I counts toward one year. (3.1.l.3) i e CY RO School on a one-forene basis. (3.1.I.4) +
. Two Years must be nuclear power plant i
experience of which at least 6 months at CY. (3.I.2) j
. ANSI N18.1 1971 (4 years Power Plant Experience, I Year Nuclear Power Plant Experience, Iligh School Diploma or GED)
(3.13) i Page 15 Of 21 Revision I i March 14,1997 .[ i 1
. _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - . -_ .. _. _ . - _ _ _ - _ = . _. __ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -
Attachment 3 -- Requirements Summary (Typical) Program Pregsdes- See Pre-requeste summary for detads Program Requrements- 10 CFR 55
- SAT based program (not audded)
TPD LOIT 94 Rev. 512/01/93
- 13 weeks on shdt (520 hours)
Lcense Form 3ws Pre-Requesnes On-5nart Tune _ On-Shift Desposnon _ OJ T Cards __ ___ __ _ _ _ _ __ Hours Hours 01 Quahfed] Total . Canddate Name Type Date Satisfed SM Log AE Last Date issue Hours Hrs l Hours ssue Species Candidate 1 HQ 2/1m - xxx 520- ~520 1/W4 No No i Oanddare 2_ Canddate 3 RO. RO 2/1/94 2/1/94 XXX XXX
, 520_.
$20 520 520
' 1/2/94 [ No' 1/3/94 No
[ Note.1 No OJT-01. rmssnf))))~' . _] Oanddate 4 ~ ~~ RO 2/1/94 ~ XXX 520 520 1/4/94~ No No~~ Canddate 5 RO ' - 2/1/94 ' XXX'- M $20 1/5/94 ~ No~ No
~ ' - ~ ~ "-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
NOTES: 1 OJT41 not h1 canddate's record, caMdate recalls bemg evaluated by J. Smith Page 16 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997 i
Attachment 4 - Prerequisites (Typical)
%esn - . , _. 2 - .3 _ .. - . ,
M'*? *'* * *.eut w1ps_ -_ _ , - , - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ ut,39,;1 ./~'~ .n . ggggy m= ..x y.,4 _,._Fe. y ees.a s N.-._^
-. .Opo.s.ase. r_ _ ___ . _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ . _ _ _ _
XXX XXX XXX XXX Note 1
. . -+ Enem em Nac La==..=e pe,r.NURE& I_OM
- 5 .2e D'"- - * *C.- " . WM ",__ *
** ~ _ - . . _ - - . - . _ . . . _ _ - . _ _ _
tN '
%~S f' - &
-- . 3.ye.rs -.paus pense
-- - -_ -. - - XXX- ._ XXX __ -.XXX-- -XXX-.- '"'M'"
_ _ . - . . . . . ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ . _ . - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ p=__m=. * =s ease W NLO . . . . . - - _ _ . . _ . - _XXX__ __XXX__ _.XXX_ . . @ -" _. _ . e. == g_.
-. - - . _ . . ~ . _ _ - -
_7 - . .s_. -gs_ _X _XX y eie . -a. p 4v.. ass...oN_ sets p .. ..
=.p.se. . _ - .
r s s , pn-XXX , No.s 2.. v
* . g A._~+ 6 x.
i nespoNsete . se . a w" panemar.no .s.a.,m A- gg.q r.gfy y ,wOf Afg~ 4., c===== w e* . ers= es hC' y4 <.- _gt 64 pg,s,g. .. gym _ 2 . eupto2, ,n.- n e i em s im. m trW M, 6.Ni e R ? #,.^ 4. . .>.. w f g . e
~w- mw
,1-w .g -.m.py.x q.y y Mg- .y yg<
w s upme , 3 e=e=ry = a= .
, o. aname.n o a nn i n n- . .i %q..y3- -y 3 .g - p--- a, - ;.<,.m3.p*c.i
- . - - .s - e.m.pWo. erws Ecow sws. Ens no ca_wn _ _ _.-_. . - -
/? s 4 '
-2.r ey.ar_,yzan y r y-e
-v i
,_ XXX_
n _o_ em- m Lua.e __. t v .
- a. n._m, awammane - - - ~
.a , .e _. n_m , . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ . _ _
e - - _XX X. __ 1* '** %*^3 * *asma.'=s _eapa =as m r .ps*.8 .a.'== _ _ ._._,, _ ____ _ _ _ _ __ C- -
'% jf.
- XXX_
_._r_.- .e.e . . . . . pe . -__
~.y
_X..X. X__ S XXX_,-
**".*****"0.***"'*'***.*'*'Y''"**"*""'**9'l______.__._____.._
to mei_e. c_o m.r._ .s_ee._ . _ _=as_e, es cv % :* Ne. G: _XXX_ _..C_
-a y m m. an.ry com as PPWO. EOOW PPW5. EW5. RO. er.CRW_.
_.___.____. .Y + V- n+" **i*t* - _XXX._
~ -- - . - _ _ - - -
_ ]E , , e asa es p.neene mi emw serge ecemamassors i _ n., mom.e{ ____ , _ - - - . - - - <^2 ._, XXX emmas=wa m.auc , . .
.__m.uas___._,_,.____-
--t..-
ts. a' - e XXX _ TPo.Loli venc h e ate 12sove3-. 1:u ". m. - ._....ss 4 . , , . .. e 7ss- m Mai:.s
- Feby es.Mos emm_ene_r_sym.m. Op.mer a uns OdLO)
_.___._._ __.XXX ,_. XXX _ .XXX _ __XXX_ __XXX _ . KEY: XXX = Sahsfes Preepsite Note 8 e Dul NOT funy Satsfy Prem:psne NLOWC = NLO he.M Card SubsteAed for NLO quahfcation for ISRO candubtes NOTES 1 Wauver grerted to anow Candidate 5 to start program pnor to completion of NLOWC Page 17 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
Attachment 5 -- On-Shift Hours (Typical) c ,=.1 c.a,-. q , c.n.w. q , c.im. q c= =.q ,
- m. , - c - -
m,. iM 3 aM , ' GG . . a i GL. mm < one, -
.ER l
-.a, .o m e ,,a m ,. m m .
m.a, - w.m
., ..a, - m. a, .
a ,. .
-m ,.
.m
.a
~"""' .1.a ~
u.c"-,4 .L
. a .
.b 2 , .
. . .m,.s.
m . .
.m , ,
.. m. m, .
om. .
~~'~.D. t i
.om.
bD t . k2b i b25 am. 4
.bD.,4
.m a ,. . w,.. . .
..<, -.<,d =
a<m. ,<
.o . .
m.a. . .
.m.
m a,
.m
- m. ., .m . ,.
.m.a
.m ,.
.m
.e. . . -
; m m.<,,
a, m.,a , m ., --
- - a, a -
.,a ,. -
m < u. <
. . , a. -
m.m.
.a ,
,~.,m,,,.c,,.
. mm -
m -
,,2,..
< m..m o,
- l
..a,.
m ,4 .
..w. , .
m m.a,
, a,. -am, m
a, us. ma - a. m , - 1 e a n 4 D
. o.'.2,
. . . ~
.on.m , m , ,4 -
~~M d
%.2,M i' 4 M 4
%.i
~,
4 '3 4
~4
~
F 1 d k7,, 2
~
~ kt, . d 3 d
.D.W d k M n km.
1 4
~M
~
a q 3 d .M A 3 h.3 ~
.b.& 1 6.&,. t , .h a
. a.~ ~s
.b.3 -
.m . . <
.m -
4
~ < . , -
--. .u, . ,. - i
.m -
-. < .m . . , -
m.a , -
.m ,
~
.6
, S. 4 e. i . , l i
d , .
.b,,
.,w
.bt
. , . - 4 .b ,w . , o.bt. . <
.stte
)
.w, , .
. , , . . ., , .m . ,
.y, - -
..~~~ ~
~...4 ..i,q.~~- . '
.~ a ~
~ ~ , .a.
me ,a
~
~.,t.f.
,, 4 , q
.,.a ,a
-o . , l
.. - . i a ,. - -
..a ,
.m ,
~
. . .o . ,. -
1 d . d o .1 ob2
, ,5,2 - -
.b t.,.~~,a -
. a
_d, -
. . .m .
.,,a. -
-,u ,,
m.m.
.. . . . m.,<.,.
. ,a,. -
t .
._6. ~. . , <
a
~
om I m,, _ d
.,t, 4 .,#,, * "'.
.,,, a, .
f),, ,, ~' .* ~.
,rt,..~~.
< ,a e '
, ,,w , .,r,,~,w,4
.,,m,
,w ,
h . r
.,,,.m < ,
.e,o
.,,w, i 4
,,.3a-
.,,, a c, , , .or,m
. , _ , j w
..y,
.,...i ,w , -
.,,.a , . ,
.m
,,4,.
- m. a ,.
e 4, m
. s
.,m m
m.aa, l m .< . 4 .
., . 4 . m .a ,
.,m_._. ..
.m. a ,. _.
m,m,.
. ...w
,.m,a, m.
f a~., w .
--p
.. ,. - m .murw
.e,,
~t.as t thei k
. .,w
~ Ts,e(St.I 8.
~
~ Vetsis.-~.n" r
k
~
..r. [
~ .es f @,9 k
~Tess W4 to [
r. 4_ _ _ _ Page 18 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
Attachment 6 -- Reactivity Control Manipulation Matrix (Typical) Date Description of Transient from SS Log 01/20/94 10% load % 10% toad mcrease 03/28 S 4 Reactor starte, Reactor tnp 03f20/94 Reactor start @,10% - 30% toad increase 03/30l94 30% - 70% load ncrease, 70% - 100% toad increase 04/1184 10% kaad reexton,10% load ancrease 04/21 S 4 10% load reex$on,10% toad ncrease 07111 84 Reactor eriutdown from 100% power 08/29/94 10% load rem 10% toad increase Reactivity Contro4 Manipulations 01/20/1934 Trans ent 03/28/1994 Iransient 03/29/15m4 Transent 03/30/1994 Transient Category'] ' Category Description ~ ~ ~ ' ' Ava'ilable Log ' Avad Credit Exc " Log A'vad' Creds Exc Log Avad~ Crede Ex[ Log Asad ' Crede Exc~ t w oe resoor meanupe in actuae on rw. mon as , cn'cahty 1 per starnq, 2~~ Reactor coned emen' pewit of crecamy to observaton of Posnt of Adeng He.1 1 per S__ tart.up.
. . . . _ - . - - _ _ - ~ - . _ . --- -. _-. . . _ . - -- _ _ -
convolsods t pw skuedoor "4-
~
Manual control of StG ' level (PAR) or recwduahon h (BER) dunng plant power changes > $% of 1 por 5% load i Na ined change
' ' ' - ~5" Bombon anser dm (PmR) or ocwculahon flouhod contrd (BWR), is abr Xenon owed e or tuswha 6 Waause md conire dunne e power change or >5% 1 per 5% ines enange
'~'7~~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~' ~ ~ ' ' '~ '~ ~~ -~~ ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' ~~
R* actor power change of >5% mewe load change 1 per 5% ined' is performed # turtano conerW l'~ change l T otal Exceeded Tors Exceeaed lotal Exceedea. Tota 4 Exceeoed l On watch. Reactivity Control Mantputations 04/11/1994 Transient 04/21/1994 Transasnt 01/11/1994 Transient Ot1/29/94 Transent Category'~ Category Description ~ ~ ~ ~Available' Log ~ Avad Credit 'Eic ' Log Aval Crede Exc~ Log ~ Avad " 'Creda Exc- L'og- Avad' Cr'edi Exc i % r uur .ianupe io.nuuoe oi erv..orn os enhcah'y a per.ata.rtup. l otmenenen of Pows of Adeng Heat. - 1 per. Stark.e. coneelsons i. per. Shutdown _. _ . . . ~ ,_ _._ __ ___. . . . _ - _ . . _ _ _ . ._ _ . , _ _ _ __ . . _ _ , _. ._ _ _ . . . .__ h (SmR) dunne piant power changes > 5% of 1 per 5% load Na t>ed change-- Aoemed coned (BWR), to Mr Xenoss tnatsup or bum-out
~ ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~~
-6
~~ ^ ~ ~~
unaual fod corse emng'a ' power change 65%
'~ ~
~ ~ ~
i per'5% load' i chance 7- Reacsor power change at >5% unsre load chanue i pw 5% toad'
' '~ ~' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " - ' ~ ' - ~ ~ - ' - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~
is performed enth harthne Coned change lota Exceeded. Tota Exceeceo Totai Exceeaed Total Exceeaed l On wardi Page 19 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997 i
2 1 1 l 1 Attachment 7 -- Reactivity Manipulation Worksheet (Typical) l 2 Date Category Name Credited ! 1/1/91 Candidate 1 1 XXX l 1/1/91 Candidate 2
. 1 XXX
$ 1/1/91 1 Candidate 3 XXX i 1/1/91 Candidate 4 1 XXX i 1/1/91 . 1 Candidate 5 XXX ! 1/2/91 1 Candidate 1 XXX f 1/2/91 1 Candidate 1 1 1/2/91 1 Candidate 1 1/2/91 1 Candidate 1 I j 1/2/91 1 Candidate 1 4 1/3/91 2 Candidate 2 XXX
- 1/3/91 2 Candidate 3 XXX
! 1/3/91 3 Candidate 2 XXX 1/3/91 l l 3 Candidate 3 XXX l . 1/4/91 6 Candidate 5 XXX l 1/4/91 6 Candidate 5 1/4/91 6 Candidate 5
- l/4/91 7 Candidate 5 XXX 4
i 1/4/91 7 Candidate 5 1/4/91 7 Candidate 5 i i i l 4 Page 20 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997
Attachment 8 -- Individual Student Summary Sheet (Sample) Student Summary Sheet Unit: Program: Student Name: License Type OJT issues Under Instruction Houra Reactivity Manioulations I Program Preregulsites 1 l Disposition Reviewed: Approved: Page 21 of 21 Revision 1 March 14,1997}}