ML20199L589

Independent Analysis & Evaluation of AM-241 & Transuranics & Subsequent Dose to Two Male Workers at Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Plant

ML20199L589
Person / Time
Site:	Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date:	12/24/1997
From:	Toohey R OAK RIDGE ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES
To:
Shared Package
ML20199L576	List: IR 05000213/1997010 ML20199L578 ML20199L589
References
NUDOCS 9802090236
Download: ML20199L589 (124)

Text

--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

C Independent Analysis and Evaluation of Am-241 and Transuranics and Subsequent Dose to Two Male Workers at Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Plant

\

Richard E. Toohey, Ph.D., CHP Director, Radiation Internal Dose Information Center Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education P.O. Box 117, MS 51 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0117 Final Report December 24,1997 in*

G E8n M888!PDR 12

.)

' Final Report .

Part I: Independent Assessment ofIntakes and D >se The intake estimates are best determined from the bioassay data, rather than the air sampling data, ,

because the air samples were not collected from the breathing zones of the workers during the

. exposures, and so may not be representative of the concentrations of radioactive material actually _

inhaled. - I used the bionssay data as listed in Tables 1 (whole-body counting) and Tables 4, 5, and .

6 (fecal analysis) in the Chabot-French report, as I did not see these data elsewhere in the materials I was supplied. _ However, I was careful not to review the intake and dosimetry ;

estimates in the report before completing my own analyses..

Intake estimates from whole-body counting ;

I began with the whole-body counting data; in general, whole body counting is more reliable than fecal analysis for intake estimation, because it is a direct measurement of the amount of activity in the body at the time of the count; one does not need to use an excretion function to relate the activity to the body content as is the case with the fecal samples. -The data were analyzed by using

- intake retention fractions (IRF's) to estimate the intake from the observed points. The IRF's 3

were taken from NUREG/CR-4884 by Lessard et al.; the NUREG gives IRF's for inhalation of

• Class Y and Class W Co-60 (assuming 1.0 micron AMAD particles) and also for ingestion of Co-

? 60, with a GI absorption factor (f) i of 0.05. Because I had no information on the configuration or collimation of the whole-body counter used for the measurements, I assumed that the IRF's for whole body retention were appropriate. Because Co-60 is a high-energy gamma emitter, even a counter that nominally _ views only the lungs also detects activity in the GI tract and elsewhere in the torso.

The best estimate ofintake is obtained by a weighted least-squares method (Skrable et al.1994),

which minimizes the sum of the squares of the deviations of the observed measurements from the predicted values. Since the predicted values equal the products of the estimated intake, I, and the appropriate IRF's (which are constants for a given model), this method provides a least-squares -

fit of the inuke.

If V' represents an observed value, I represents the intake at time zero, and E represents the IRF at a particular time, we want to minimize the sum: .

[(V, - I E,f i

We do this by setting the partial derivative with respect to I equal to zero:

[(V, - I E,f = 0 d

Final Report V,' - 2 V,1 E, + 1' E,') = 0

[ -2 V, E, + [ 2 1 E,' = 0

i f

[2V,E,

[ V, E, J= .

[ 2 E,' [ E,'

o s

- This represents an unweightedleast squares estimate of the intake. In addition, knowledge of the uncertainty of any of the individual estimates wCl allow one to weight the importance of any given point and influence the final result. The weighting factor may be applied at the initial sum of

- squares and carried through the calculation if desired:

[(V,-IE,fw, I

where wi si the weight attached to the I-th data point. This may be user specified, or related to the inverse of the variance, etc. If the variance of each measurement is assumed to be proportional to the activity in a sample, then the weighting factor applied would be proportional ,

to 1/E (as the activity in a sample would be proportional to E*I), and the weightedleast squares estimate of the intake would be:

[ V, J = ['E, i

These calculations are very easy to perform on a spreadsheet, and I simply use MS Excel. The

- IRF's are taken directly from NUREG/CR-4884, and for a time that is not listed in the NUREG tables, a logarithmic interpolation is used to obtain an IRF value. All spreadsheets and figures prepared for this work are attached as appendices.

2-1

x Final Report The above method gives the best estimate of the intake, in the least-squares sense, for a given model, e.g., the ICRP-30 lung model, assuming inhalation of Class Y,1.0 micron AMAD particles, because the IRF's used in the calculation are model-specific. In order to evaluate which of several models gives the best 6t to the data, I use the method also presented by Skrable et al.

(1994), which looks for the minimum value of chi-squared (x 2), which is defined as:

a X* = E (V - FE,)2 s.n Var, where the variance of each point, Vari, is proportional to the fitted value, (I E). By calculating this parameter for each fit, we can determine, on a scientifically defensible basis, which model does in fact provide the best fit to the data.

Worker 1 (Worker B) whole-1,ody counting data:

The reported data were first fitted under three assumptions: 1) inhalation only of Class Y material,

2) inhalation only of Class W material, and 3) ingestion only. The calculations are shown on Page 1 of Sheet 1 (8 pages). None of there three fits was acceptable, as inspection of Figure 1 shows.

, There was very little difference between the Class Y and Class W inlialation fits. Both inhalation 6ts underestimated the intake it early times and overestimated it at late times; convers ely, the ingestion fit overestimated the intake at early times and underestimated it at late times. This behavior is an indication that either the actual intake included both inhalation and ingestion, or that the particle size was larger than 1 micron. Of course, some ingestion always accompanies inhalation, because particles are deposited in the upper respiratory tract and cleared directly to the gut without entering the bmgs; this is accounted for by the ICRP-30 lung model. Ingestion in this case means the swallowing of particles deposited in the oral cavity either by mechanical transfer from the hands or deposition on the face around the mou*.h, or deposition of non respirable particles from mouth breathing. (The ICRP-30 lung model does not cover mouth breathing.) The way to handle this is to compute combined IRF's, which are just the sum of the inhalation and ingestion IRF's times the respective fractions of the intake proceeding by that route.

Because the pure ingestion fit appeared to be closer to the actual data than the pure inhalation 6ts, I started with 90% ingestion and 10% inhalation, which actually gave a very good fit to the observed data. To pin this down, I calculated the value of 2x for each fitted model. I then plotted 2

the x values as a function of percent ingestion, and obtained Figure 2, which shows that the best fit to the data comes from assuming 91% ingestion and 9% inhalation (no difference between Y and W). The total estimated intake was 418 nCi of Co-60, of which 380 nCi was ingested and 38 nCi was inhaled (Table 1 A and Figure 3). If after this procedure a good fit to the data were la: king, the next step would normally be to vary the particle size from the default assumption of 1.0 micron AMAD; however, one usually doesn't get a much better fit to bioassay data than that l

o

Final Report in Figure 3, so in my professionaljudgement, adjusting the model for different panicle size was unnecessary at this point. If some independent measurement of particle size from an air filter or other sample were available, then a calculation for that panicle size could be attempted. It should .

be noted that the " ingestion" intake most likely represents intake of some panicles that are too large to be deposited in the respiratory tract, i.e., so-called non-respirable panicles; " inhalation" intake may be considered to represent that fraction of the particles that was of respirable size.

Table IA: estimated intakes of Co-60, based on whole-body counting and assuming a mixed inhalation /insestion intake of 1-n AMAD particles.

Worker : Inhalation intake, nCi Ingestion intake, nCi 1 38 380 2 28 906 Worker 2 (Worker A) whole-body counting data:

The same procedure was followed for Worker 2; the calculations are shown on Sheet 2 (6 pages).

The same pattern was observed as for Worker 1 (Figure 4); the best 6t was obtained by assuming

. 97% ingestion and 3% inhalation (Figures S & _6). The total intake was 934 nCi of Co-60, of which 906 nCi was ingested and 28 nCi was inhaled (Table 1 A).

Intake estimates from fecal data

. Worker 1 (Worker B):

Interpretation of these data also depends somewhat on the observed activity ratios of the transuranics and the Co 60 in the fecal samples themselves and in the air and smear samples from

- the plant. The first step was to see if the same model that fit the whole-body counting data also fit the fecal data, namely an intake of 418 nCi Co-60 with 91% ingestion and 9% inhalation; these

. calculations are shown on pages 1 and 2 of Sheet 3 (6 pages), and the results are shown in Fig. 7; the answer is that the same model does not fit the fecal data. That model overestimates the observed data by a factor of 3 to 10, depending on the day. I am assuming that the observed fecal data represent 24-hour excretion; this assumption is supported by the fact that the masses of the

. fecal samples are close to 135 g, the daily fecal mass excreted by Reference Man (ICRP 23). The next step is to assume that because fecal sampling was not begun until almost a week after the intake, activity in the fecal samples represents only clearance ofinhaled material from the lungs, and does not contain any activity that was originally ingested. A 6t to the fecal data assuming only inhalation gives a relatively good fit to the time pattern of the excretion, but yields an inhalation intake of 98 nCi, almost three times that obtained from the whole-body counts (38 nCi by inhalation, as discussed above.) At this point, one must make a decision about the data: since whole-body counting is more reliable for detection of gamma-emitters such as Co-60 than is fecal

)

=

Final Report sampling (since much more activity is being assessed in the WBC), I assume that the fit to the whole-body counting data gives the best estimate ofintake, and discount the fecal data for Co-60 In point of fact, having only a factor of two to three difference between whole-body counting and fecal data isn't bad in the internal dosimetry business.

As for uranium, the activity ratios of uranium to the other nuclides in the feal samples are inconsistent from day to day; in addition, uranium is not reported in the air and debris samples.

Because the average fecal excretion of naturally occurring dietary uranium is 1-2 pCi/d, I assume

~

that the uranium in the facal samples is coming from dietary intake, and not occupational exposure.

The activity ratios of the transuranics to Co-60 and to each other in the fecal samples of worker 1 ,

are fairly consistent, .ind also track reasonably well with the activity ratios in the air and fecal samples (see Sheet 5). Consequently, one way of ansessing intake of these radionuclides would be simply to scale them to the intake of Co-60, based on the whole body counting data However, I feel a better way is to fit the fecal data as late clearance ofinhaled material, n use those results to estimate inhalation intakes. One reason for this is that we may be sure that the

' TRU activity in fecal samples was actually in the body; there is no guarantee that the activity ratios in the air and debris samples is in fact the same as that in the material that was actually

- inhaled / ingested. Thus I used the IRF's for inhalation from NUREG/CR-4884 for each '

transuranic nuclide; if there was a significant difference between the fits for Class Y and Class W materials, I let the data decide. (This is discussed more below.) The ingestion intakes are then best estimated by scaling them by the ingestion / inhalation ratio for Co-60 as determined from the whole-body counting data; This analysis is shown on pages 3-6 of Sheet 3, and the fits for Am-241 are shown in Figure 8. The results are summarized in Table 1 below.

There are no a priori reasons for assuming the TRU nuclides are a particular 'mhalation class; even

.though assumption of a particular class results in a better fit, the differences are not large, and there are only three points to work with. However, the dose calculations are greatly affected by the assumption of an inhalation class. Class W materials will be more soluble and leave the lung both in greater quantity and more quickly than Class Y materials. Once absorbed into the transfer compartment, TRU_ nuclides deposit on bone surfaces, which is the limiting organ in the ICRP-30__

system for most of these intake scenarios. Consequently, I recommend, for conservatism in dose estimation, that the TRU nuclides be assumed to be Class W materials, and the Class W biokinetic model and dose conversion factors be used. The intake estimates for Worker 1, based on the assumption of Class W for all TRU, are shown in Table 2 on the next page. (Note: for Co-60, neither the intake estimates nor the doses depend very much on the inhalation class.)

t

1 Final Report Table 1: Estimated intakes of TPU for Worker 1 from fits to fecal data Worker 1 Ingestion: Worker 1 Inhalation: ..

Nuclide & Class nCi Pq. Nuclide & Class nCi Bq Co-60 (Y) 380 14060 Co-60 (Y) 38 1406 ,

Pu-238 (Y) 3.84 143 Pu-238 (Y) 0.38 14.1 Pu-239,240 (Y) 1.72 63.6 Pu-239,240 (Y) 0.17 6.3 Am-241 (Y) 3.44 127 Am-241 (Y) 0.34 12.6 Cm-244 (W) 1.90- 70.3 Cm-244 (W) 0.188 7.0 Table 2:. Estimated intakes of TRU for Worker 1 from fits to fecal data, assuming all Class W.

Worker 1 Ingestion: Worker 1 Inhalation:

I Nuclide & Class nCi Bq Nuclide & Class nCi Bq-Co-60 (Y) 380 14060 Co-60 (Y) 38 1406-Pu-238 (W) 3.50 130 Pu-238 (W) 0.346 12.8-Pu-239,240 (W) 1.58 58.5 N-239,240 (W)

56 5.8 Am-241 (W) 3.34 124 Am-241 (W) 0.33 12.2 Cm-244 (W)- 1.90 70.3 Cm-244 (W) 0.188 7.0 Worker 2 (Worker A) fecal data:

The fecal data for Worker 2 are computed on Sheet 4 (9 pages) and shown in Figures 9 and 10.

These data are much more difficult to interpret than are those for Worker 1. For one thing, there is only a single Co-60 value. More importantly, however, the masses reported for days 10.1 and -

13.1 are well below the ICRP-23 value of135 g, and so may not represent 24-hour collections.

One way of dealing with this is to scale the activity in each of the last two samples by the ratio of 135 to the mass. As it turns out, this makes very little difference (10-20%) in the estimated intakes and resulting doses. I handled the data for Worker 2 the same as for Worker 1: Co 60 intakes from the whole-body counting data, transuranic inhalation from the fect.! data (scaled for mass of sample), and transuranic ingestion from the inhalation values scaled for the Co-60 ingestion / inhalation ratio. The results are shown in Table 3 (Class Y Am-241-best 6t) and in Table 4 (all Class W) on the next page.

Final Report Table 3: Estimated intakes of TRU for Worker 2 from 6ts to scaled fecal dsta -

Worker 2 Ingestion: Worker 2 Inhalation:

Nuclide & Class nCi Bq Nuclide & Class nCi Bq Co-60 (Y) 906 33520 Co-60 (Y) 28 1036 Pu-238 (W) 3.01 111 Pu-238 (W) 0.093 3.4 Pu-239,240 (W) 1.10 40.7 Pu-239,240 (W) - 0.034 1.3' Am-241 (Y). 6.47. 239 Asn-241 (Y) 0.200 7.4 Cm-244 (W) 3.49 129 Cm-244 (W) 0.108 4.0 Table 4: Estimated intakes of TRU for Worker 2 from fits to scaled fecal data, assuming Class W Worker 2 Ingestion: Worker 2 inhalation:

Nuclide & Class nCi Bq Nuclide & Class nCi' Bq Co-60 (Y) 906 33520 Co-60 (Y) 28 1036 i Pu-238 (W) 3.01 111 Pu-238 (W) 0.093 3.4 Pu-239,240 (W) 1.10 40.7 Pu-239,240 (W) 0.034 1.3 Am-241 (W) 5.72 212 Am-241 (W) 0.177 6.5 Cm-244 (W) 3.49 129 Cm-244 (W) 0.108 4.0 Dose calculations: '

The dose calculations are straight-forward, once the intake values h:.ve been determined. The dose conversion factors (DCF's) are taken from Federal Guidanc ter.rt #11. For inhaled Co-60, the most irradiated organ is lung, and the annual limit on intake (ALI) is based on the nochastic limit of 5 rem committed effective dose couivalent (CEDE); for ingested Co-60, the most irradiated organ is " remainder", and again, CEDE is limiting. For most of them ' haled transuranics, (i.e., Pu-239,240, Am-241, and Cm-244) bone surface is the most irradiated organ, and the ALI is based on the stochastic limit of 50 rem committed dose equivalent (CDE) to bone surface. For Pu-238, bone surface is most irradiated for Class W compounds, and lung is the most irradiated for Class Y compounds, thus the ALI's are based on different limits for the two solubility classes. As mentioned above, I feel it is conservative to assume Class W for all TRU's l

. a

Final Report i and use the Class W DCF's. For the ing,.sted transuranics, bone surface is the most irradiated -

organ in all cases. The dose calculations for various assumptions are given on Sheet 6 (4 pages);

the preferred values are shown on page 6 of Geet 6 and are summarized in Table 5 below (all values in mrem).

Table 5: Dose estimates assuming all TRU are Class W, mixed inhalation and ingestion,1 mu nrticles, using ICRP-30 models.-

Worker 1 Ingestion Inhalation Total Nuclide CEDE CDE (BS) CEDE CDE (BS) CEDE CDE (BS)

Co-60 3.9 1.3 8.2 1.9 12.1 3.2 Pu-238 11.2 205 136 2430 147 2635 l Pu-239,240 5.6 103 67.0 1220 72.6 1323 Am-241 12.3 225 148 2670 160 2895 Cm-244 3,8 68.7 46.6 814 50.4 883- 4 Grand Totals 36.8 603 405- 7140 442 7740 Worker 2 Ingestion Inhalation - Total Nuclide CEDE CDE (BS) CEDE CDE (BS) CEDE- CDE (BS)

Co-60 9.3 3.2 6.1 1.4 15.4 4.6 Pu-238 9.6 - 175 36.4 652 46 827 Pu-239,240 3.9 ' 72.2 14.7 268 18.6 340 Am-241 20.8 383 78.6 1420 -99.4 1803 Cm-244 7.0 126 26.8 468 33.8 594 Grand Totals 50.7 -760 163 2810 213 3570

- So the bottom lines from my analysis of the bioassay data are:

Worker 1 (Worker B): 442 mrem CEDE,7740 mrem CDE to bone surface Worker 2 (Worker A): 213 mrem CEDE,3570 mrem CDE to bone surface.

Final Report ,

. For worker 1, these doses represent 8.8% of the annual CEDE limit of 5 rem and 15.5% of the annual CDE limit of 50 rem.- For worker 2, these doses represent 4.3 % of the annual CEDE limit of 5 rem'and 7,1% of the annual CDE limit of 50 rem. Cc,nsequently, in my professional opinion, these intake incidents did not lead to a violation of the occupational dose limits in 10CFR20.1201.

. Alternate dose calculations, obtained by ascuming all transuranics are not Class W, but are Class Y or W as indicated by the best 6ts to the fecal data, and also by estimating the TRU intakes by simply scaling the Co-60 intakes by the activity ratios in air and debris samples are included in ,

Sheet 6,~ but not discussed further in this report, Comparison wkh licensee's consultants' assessment:

The licensee's dose estimates were perfonned by Drs. Chabot and French of the University of R Lowell; the dose estimates are compared below:

Table 6: Comparison oflicensee's and this report's dose estimates. .

Chabot & French (mrem) This report (mrem) 1' Worker 1 CEDE 440 442

. Worker 1 CDE 5400 7740 Worker 2 CEDE- 250 213 Worker 2 CDE 3000 3570 These two sets of results are essentially identical; the differences arise from minor differences made in the assumptions on which they are based. For example, Chabot and French used lung IRF's to analyze the whole-body counting data, while I used total body; they arrived at the.

ingestion / inhalation ratios by using a least-squares computer program (LSModel), while I did the calculations on a spreadsheet-we obtained essentially identical results for the ratios. A review of the documentation of the LSModel program shows it uses a standard matrix inversion method to solve a linear system of equations, and may be considered reliable. They included dose from uranium in the fecal samples, while I assumed the uranium found in feces was from non-occupational sources. They assumed the last two fecal samples from worker 2 represented complete daily samples, while I scaled them to Reference Man values. I used dose conversion

- factors published in FGR #11 to compute doses from intakes, while they scaled the intakes to the published ALI values. Because ALI's are rounded to one significant figure, this is another source of some difference in the dose estimates.

The analysis of the bioassay data by Chabot and French was based on standard methods of data interpretation that have been well documented in the scientific literature; I fully support their

Final Report analyses, and would have obtained identical results had I made the same assumptions. In the  ;

analysis of bioassay data, we never know exactly what happened; the data analysis is a bit of a detective story, and the analyst's interpretation and assumptions are based to some extent on personal experience and preferences. In the current case, we both used standard ICRP 30 models, detennined that the whole-body counting data clearly indicated a mixture ofinhalation and ingestion intakes (or, a mixture ofinhalation of respirable and intake of non-respirable size -

particles), used the fecal data to establish the inhalation intakes of the transuranics, and concluded that all doses received by these workers were 15% or less of the applicable dose limits. In my

professional opinion, because the estimated doses are small fractions of the applicable limits, there is no need to explore the consequences of different assumptions about inhalation class, particle size, retention functions, excretions rates, etc., in order to refine the dose estimates further.

PART 2: Estimates ofIntakes and Doses Assuming Only Inhalation of Larges rticles An assessment of the effect of particle size on the intake estimates and resulting doses was performed using two different respiratory tract deposition and clearance models. The first used the computer program CINDY, based on the ICRP 30 respiratory tract model, and the second -

used LUDEP, based on the ICRP 66 respiratory tract model. LUDEP was developed by the

National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) of the UK, and is available from that organization at a nominal cost.

CINDY was used in its " bioassay projection" mode to compute intake retention fractions (IRFs) .

for the whole-body content (as measured by whole-body counting) following inhalation of Co-60 for different particle sizes. The particle sizes used were 1 (to compare with the previous calculations),5, 8,10,15, and 20 micron (p)' AMAD The IRFs for 15. and 20-p particles .

were computed by providing CINDY with deposition fractions in the NP, TB, and P regions of the respiratory tract estimated from the plots of deposition fractions as functions of particle size

. given in ICRP 30. As before, the IRFs were used to compute a best estimate ofintake by the weighted least squares method, and the different models were evaluated by computing and comparing their chi-squared values. The intake estimate for 1 p particles for Worker 1 was 338 nCi from the CINDY calculations, identical to 333 nCi for the original calculation (assuming inhalation only), confirming that the two methods are equivalent. The CINDY results for Worker 1 are shown on spreadsheet 7 and for Worker 2 on spreadsheet 8. The chi-square values are shown in Figure 11 for Worker 1 and Figure 12 for Worker 2. From these figures it is evident that the larger particle sizes appear to res ilt in better 6ts to the whole-body counting data than those computed for 1-p particles . For Vcorker 1, it appeared that a particle size of about 15 p gave ti.e best fit, while for worker 2, a particle size of 20 gave the best fit. However, the chi-square values for the CINDY-generated fits were not less than those calculated for the combined inhalation and ingestion of 1- particles discussed previously (Table 6A.)

Final Report Table 6A: comparison of chi square values for various fits to WBC data, Worker 1 Fit x,2 Combined inhalation &

ingestion, Ip 19.48 CINDY inhalation,15 p 75.99 CINDY inhalation,20 p 80.64 LUDEP inhalation,20 p 16.62 Because the ICRP-30 model which CINDY uses de.:s not go past 20 p particles sizes, I then used LUDEP to generate IRFs from the ICRP-66 mod'.t. These calculations are shown in spreadsheet 9 for Worker 1 and spreadsheet 10 for Worker '.. The chi-square values are also plotted in Figures 11 and 12 for Workers 1 and 2, respestively. For Worker 1, a panicle size of 20 p gave the best 6t, and the LUDEP-based fits were .dso better than the CINDY-based 6ts. In fact, the LUDEP-based fit for inhalation of 20-p particles were better (i.e., the chi-square value was less) than the fit for combined inhalation and ingestion of 1-p particles (16.6 vs.19.48) for Worker 1.

For worker 2, the LUDEP fits gave the lowest chi-square at 25-p, but this value was not very different from that at 20-p (101 vs.103); again, however, both were lower than the chi-square value for he combined inhalation and ingestion of 1-p particles (185). (For simplicity, I will assume a particle size of 20-p for both workers.) Consequently, I conclude that the best fits to the whole-body counting data, and therefore the best estimates ofintake, are derived from the ICRP-66 respiratory tract model based on the inhalation of 20- AMAD particles. The whole-body counting data and the fitted results from the 1CRP-66 models are shown in Figures 13 and 14 for Workers 1 and 2, respectively. The same 6ts are shown with the inhalation / ingestion models in Figures 15 and 16 for Workers 1 and 2, respectively, and it can be seen that the larger particle inhalation model does fit the data better in each case. The intakes of Co-60 and the associated TRU (based on the mean activity ratios in air and debris samples) are given in Table 7:

Table 7: Inhalation of 20-p particles GCRP-66 model), TRU scaled to Co-60 intakes Nuclide Worker 1 (nCi) Worker 2 (nCi)

Co-60 672 1523 Pu-238 1.06 2.39 -

Pu-239,240 0.43 0.97 Am-241 1.49 3.37 Cm 244 0.80 1.81

Final Report The fecal data were also fitted with LUDEP; IRFs for fecal excretion following inhalation of 20-p particles were generated for both Co-60 and Am-241. This procedure in general did not impiove the 6ts to the fecal data; (see spreadsheets 11 and 12, and figures 17 through 20.) However, for consistency with the previous calculations, the TRU intakes were estimated from the fits to the fecal data; in all cases, assuming Class W (Type M) behavior.

Table 8: LUDEP-based intakes, TRU fitted to fecal data (scaled for Worker 2).

Nuclide Worker 1 (nCi) Worker 2 (nCi)

Co-60 672 1523 Pu-238 1.64 0.473 Pu-239,240 0.74 0.175 Am-241 1.46 0.901 Cm-244 0.80 0.518 The intakes computed from the Sts to the whole-body counting and fecal data for inhalation of 20-p particles can be used for dose assessment, but dose conversion factors (DCFs) for 20-p particles had to be computed with LUDEP. This was done by simply entering an intake of 1 Bq into the programs and allowing them io compute the resulting dose in Sv; this number is then the DCF in Sv/Bq. The results and the calculated doses are shown in spreadsheet 13 for the two workers, based on LUDEP DCF's. Theoretically, we could use ICRP-30 DCF's to calculate doses from the intake values determined with LUDEP; however, this process is scientifically -

indefensible. The DCF is a value of dose per unit intake, and so is based on a specific lung model, including the fraction of the intake deposited in various regions of the lung, the lung retention times, and the fractions absorbed from the lung. Thus we cannot apply ICRP-30 DCF's to LUDEP data, since the latter is based on the ICRP-66 lung model. Fitting the data using one set of assumed retentions and absorptions from the lung, and then multiplying the estimated intakes by DCF's based on a different set of assumed retentions and absorptions from the lung is not just mixing apples and oranges, it's more like mixing apples and candlesticks.

However, once the organ doses have been computed with LUDEP-derived DCF's the effective dose (equivalent) may be computed with either ICRP-60 or ICRP-30 tissue weighting factors.

The effective dose (equivalent) is not a physical quantity, rather, it is a measure of risk tased on a selected set of dose-response models. Bet.ause the limits in 10CFR20 are intended to limit the risk to workers, based on ICRP-30 tissue weighting (and therefore risk) factors, it is appropriate to use ICRP-30 tissue weighting factors with LUDEP-calculated tissue doses to assess regulatory compliance. The latter are summarized in Table 9 below:

Final Report Table 9: Dose parameters based on intakes in Table 8, using LUDEP DCF's for organ doses and ICRP-30 tissue weighting factors for effective dose equivalent.

LUDEP DCF's, CEDE, mSv (rem) CDE-BS, mSv (rem) 20-p AMAD, all TRU Class W Worker 1 4.19 (0.42) 72.5 (7.25)

Worker 2 1.98 (0.20) 31.6 (3.16) ,

These values are conservative estimates, because they are based on assuming that all the TRU's are behaving as Type M (ICRP 66) or Class W (ICRP 30) material, i.e., more soluble and so I

translocating to bone more quickly and in greater amounts. It is likely in fact that the TRU's in the particles are bound in the particle matrix and will behave like Type S or Class Y materials, as the Co-60 data indicate. Ir this case, they would move to bone more slowly, and the CDE to I bone surface would be less. However, for regulatory compliance assessment, since 10CFR20 requires the use ofICRP-30 tissue weighting factors, this last table (Table 9) could be used.

Part III: Scientinc evaluation and comparison of models and conclusions:

It is evident that there is a variety of possible dose assessments for this intake; the parameters that affect the assessment include: particle size, solubility (or transportability) class (primarily for the transuranics), respiratory tract model (ICRP-30 or ICRP-66), dosimetry system (ICRP-30 or ICRP-60), and perhaps some others, such as breathing rate, nose or mouth breathing, etc. It is clear that the best estimates ofintake, in terms of the fit to the whole-body counting data, are provided by the ICRP-66 model with the assumption ofinhalation of 20-p AMAD Type S particles. Given those intake values, the choice of dose conversion factor is somewhat arbitrary.

The best estimate of CDE to bone surface and CED is from the ICRP-60 system with Type M behavior for the transuranics (shown in spreadsheet 13, but not discussed further.) For regulatory compliance, the last table above, using the ICRP-30 tissue weighting factors, is most comparable with the dose limits in 10CFR20.

A dose assessment based completely on ICRP-30 models (lung model and DCF's, as well as tissue weighting factors) is shown in sheet 14 A and summarized in Tables 10 and 11 below. This assessment used the CINDY computer program to generate intake retention fractions for the inhalation of particles larger than 1 micron, and then used those IRFs to generate the best estimates ofintake, and compare the predicted retention of Co-60 with that observed in the whole-body counts. For Worker 1, the best fit was for 15-micron particles, and for Worker 2, for 20-micron particles. It is important to remember, however, that this procedure did not give a better overall fit to the whole-body counting data than the assumption of combined inhalation and ingestion of 1-micron particles. Nevertheless, it is ofinterest to determine the dose parameters

~

Final Report generated from the fits, Because there was not much difference in the chi-squared values between the 15. and 20-micron particle sizes for Worker 1 (see Figure 11), and because the data for Worker 2 indicated 20-micron particles (see Figure 12),' and also because the ICRP-66 model indicated 20-microns was the best fit for particle size, I decided to assume a 20-micron size for-the dose' calculations. The estimates of transuranic radionuclide intakes are based on the estimated inhalation intakes of Co-60 and the activity ratios in the air and debns samples.=

Table 10: Inhalation of 20-p particles, ICRP-30 model via CINDY, TRU scaled to Co-60 intakes Nuclide Worker 1 (nCi) Worker 2 (nCi)

Co-60 341 798 Pu-238 0.54- 'l.25 Pu-239,240 0.22 0.51 Am-241 - 0.75 1.76 Cm-244 0.41 0.95 L Table 11: Dose parameters based on intakes in Table 10, with ICRP-30 models l-i ICRP-30 DCF's, CEDE, mSv (rem) CDE-BS, mSv (rem)

. 20-p AMAD, all TRU Class W Worker 1- 7.1 (0.71) 129 (12.9)

Worker 2 - 16.5 (1.65) 302 (30.2)

The doses estimated from the various models are summarized on spreadsheet 15. The best science is represented by the use of the ICRP-66 lung model with the assumption of 20-micron J

particle size. The intakes of Co-60 are then determined by fitting the whole-body counting data with an intake estimate and retention based on ICRP-66, as calculated with the computer program LUDEP. These figures are 672 nCi for Worker 1 and 1520 nCi for Worker 2, as shown on

. Spreadsheet 13;

' The estimates of TRU intakes are more speculative. There are three ways to derive an estimate:

use the activity ratios measured in the air and debris samples, use the activity ratios measured in the fecal samples, or fit the fecal data directly. Each method has advantages and disadvantages.

Using the activity ratio in the air and debris samples eliminates problems with biokinetic models, but does not guarr e that the material collected in the air and debris samples is the same as that to which the wc/ vere exposed. Using the activity ratios in the fecal samples assumes that d

.=

Final Report

~t he TRU nuclides clear from the lung through the gastrointestinal tract at the same rate as the Co-60 doesi-If all the radioactivity is in fairly insoluble particles, this may be a reasonable assumption, but we cannot guarantee that such is the case. In addition, there is only one sample from Worker 2 for this comparison. Fitting the fecal data directly assumes that the standard

biokinetic models used correctly describe the behavior of the TRU nuclides in these individuals.

This approach, however, does at least use actual bioassay data from the workers; the material being excreted is obviously representative of the material inhaled. In general, the ~use of bioassay data is preferable, because of the assurance that the data being 6tted are representative of the intakes. In the current case, however, there are other factors to consider. The whole-body countir.g data for Co-60 are easily the best data available; whole-body counting is very sensitive for Co-60, and the data are available for an extended period. The fact that the whole-body counting data appears to be most consistent with inhalation of 20-micron particles brings additional uncenainty to the biokinetic models used to predict fecal excretion. 'In addition, the intakes of Co-60 fitted to the fecal data are not consistent with the intakes derived from the l whole-body counting data, casting further doubt on the biokinetic models for fecal excretion.

Given all these circumstances, it is not unreasonable to make the simplest assumption, and use the TRU activity ratio measured in the air and debris samples.

Consequently, the best current estimates ofintakes, and resulting doses are based on the ratio of TRU activity measured in the air and debris samples. These intakes are listed on spreadsheet 13, page 1. Finally, for regulatory compliance purpose:, although the organ doses nmy be computed -

using the ICRP-60 and ICRP-66 models, the calculation of CEDE inust be made using ICRP-30 tissue weighting factors. Following this procedure, the "best" estimate of dose parameters for this -

incident is shown belowin Table 12:

Table 12: Dose parameters based on inhalation of 20-micron particles with the ICRP-66 model, TRU ratios in air / debris samples, DCF's from ICRP-66, and CEDE with ICRP-30 tissue weighting factors.

ICRP-60 DCF's, CEDE, mSv (rem) CDE-BS, rem 20- AMAD, all q

TRU Class W >

Worker 1 0.34 -5.85 Worker 2 0.77 13.2 s

The different dose assessments are compared in spreadsheet 15. In my estimation, no regulatory limits were exceeded by these intakes.

.. 1

Final Report.

Spreadsheets 13 and 14A also both contain the same data regarding the feasibility of additional-hionssay monitoring of these intakes cunently. For simplicity, I use 250 days as the elapsed .  !

' time, and computed the appropriate IRF's; for each subject, Co-60 should still be detectable by

. whole-body counting, assuming the MDA is a few tenths of a nCi. However, Am 241 (and the other TRU) will no longer be detectable in excreta samples, assuming the analytical MDA is about 0.015 dpm.

APPENDIX Contact summary:

1. Initial contact regarding this task was a telephone call fre n Dr.' Donna-Beth Howe of NRC NMSS to Dr. R. E. Toohey of RIDIC on 11 Feb.1997. Dr. Lowe briefly described the task, and -

Dr.Toohey agreed that RIDIC could perform the task within the existing NRC contract.

!= 2. A conference call was held on 12 Feb. among Howe, Toohey, R. Nimitz and J. White of-f.egion 1, and R. Pedersen of NRR. A detailed discussion of the incident took place, and t' 1 tasks that RIDIC would perform for NRC were agreed upon: an independent dose assessment for the workers involved, based on the available bioassay data, and an independent assessment of the validity of the licensee's dose report, and discussion of any cther questions that may arise as the project proceeds.

3. The NRC package was received on 19 Feb., and review of the incident and independent dose assessment was begun.

4. On 19 Feb., Toohey sent an email message to Howe, Nimitz, White and Pedersen to test email communication.

5. On 20 Feb., Toohey received an email from Howe emphasizing that the purpose of a draft report was to ensure that all questions had been addressed, not to see if conclusions were acceptable to the NRC.

6. On 10 March Toohey sent an email to Nimitz asking what the relation was between " Worker 1 and 2" as identified in the licensee's report, and " Worker A and B" identified in the NRC inspection report. Nimitz responded that Worker 1 was Worker B, and Worker 2 was Worker A.

7. A letter from Dr. Donna-Beth Howe was received on 11 March 1997, containing a detailed list of tasks to be performed and reporting requirements.

8. On 25 March, Toohey transmitted a copy of the draft report as an email attachment; no responses were received from the recipients, leading Toohey to believe that the report could not

Final Report ' '

be read by their email systems.

9. On 26 March, Pedersen informed Toohey by email that the report was unreadable and requested a copy be sent by express mail.

10. On 26 March, Toohey requested all parties to provide him with their delivery addresses for Federal Express; responses were received on 26 and 27 March.

11. On 28 March, Toohey sent out copies of the draft report.

- 12. On 31 March, a conference call was held in which some minor corrections were made to the

- draft repon and a discussion was held of the possible effects of assuming a larger particle size 'on .

the intake and dose estimates.' Nimitz agreed to provide Toohey with some calculations from the dose assessment program'CINDY which inchsded larger particle sizes.

13. On 3 April, another conference call was held discussing the draft report; Toohey agreed to L provide a correction letter noting that the repon was indeed a " draft" and requesting the

[ recipients to markit as such.

14.LOn.15 May, Nimitz sent Toohey a letter with the Cindy output for different panicle sizes.

- 15.~ On 1 July, Howe contacted Toohey inquiring about the status of the.repon; Toohey agreed

.to provide a final draft on 11 July.

16.. On 8 July, Toohey and Nimitz exchanged telephone calls and emails on the status of the report.

17. On 11 July, Toohey received an email from Howe specifically stating the additional items to

~

be included in the draft .al report.-

18. On 11 July, Toohey completed and transmitted the draft final report.

' 19 '_ On 18 July, Nimitz sent an e-mail to Toohey with some points for clarification.

' 20. On 25 July, a conference call was held among Toohey, Howe, Pedersen, and Nimitz discussing the applicability of the various intake and dose models.

21. _ On August 5, Toohey transmitted a final draft report incorporating the above comments.

22. On September 4, Nimitz called Toohey to discuss the report and request a supplemental report comparing the intake estimates and dose calculations using various assumptions, and identifying the best scientific estimate of the intakes and resulting organ doses.

Final Report -

23; On September 7, Toohey transmitted a draft supplemental report to Nimita.

24. On December 18, a conference call between Toohey, Nimitz, Howe, and Pedersen was held,-

discussing various aspects of the report and requesting a final report.

25. - On December 24, Toohey completed and transmitted the fmal report.

26. On January 6,1998, Nimitz called Toohey and pointed out several remaining typos in the report, and requested the caption of Table 9 be clarified.

i 27.: On January 12,1998, Toohey mailed out revised pages for insertion in the final report.

l

References:

International Commission on Radiological Protection. Report of the task group on Reference --

Man Oxford: Pergamon Press; ICRP Publication 23,1975.

International Commission on Radiological Protection. Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by Workers. ICRP Publication 30, Annals ICRP 2 (3/4),1979 (and supplements.)

- International Commission on Radiological Protection.1990 Recommendations of'he International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publice' ion 60, Annals ICRP 21(1-

-3),1991.

International Commission on Radiological Protection. Human Respiratory Tract model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66, Annals ICRP 24(1-3),1994.

E. T. Lessard, Y. Xia, K. W. Skrable, et.al. Interpretation of Bioassay Measurements.

NUREG/CR-4884, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL-NUREG-52063,1987.

L K. W. Skrable, G. E. Chabot, C. S. French,' and T. R. LaBone. Estimation ofIntakes from Repetitive Bioassay Measurements. In: Internal Radiation Dosimetry (O. G, Raabe, ed., Medial Physics Publishing, Madison, WI) pp. 431-460,1994.

Final Report .

Attached Excel Spreadsheets:

' Sheet 1: Whole-body counting data analysis for Worker 1 (8 pages)

Sheet 2: Whole-body counting data analysis for Worker 2 (6 pages)

Sheet 3: Fecal data analysis for Worker 1 (6 pages)

Sheet 4: Fecal data analysis for Worker 2 (9 pages)f Sheet 5: Activity ratios in focal, air, and debris samples (2 pages)

Sheet 6: Dose ~ calculations (6 pages)

Sheet 7: Worker 1, CINDY IRFs for WBC as a function of particle size (6 pages)-

Sheet 8: Worker 2, CINDY IRFs for WBC as a function of particle size (6 pages)

- Sheet 9: Worker 1, LUDEP IRFs for_WBC as a function of particle size (9 pages)

- Sheet 10: Worker 2, LUDEP IRFs for WBC as a function of particle size (9 pages)

Sheet 11: Worker 1, LUDEP IRFs for focal analysis (4 pages)

Sheet 12: Worker 2, LUDEP IRFs for fecal analysis (10 pages)

Sheet 13: Dose calculations, LUDEP DCFs, TRU from Co-60 ratios or fecal fits (2 pages) -

Sheet 14A: Dose calculations, CINDY ;atakes and DCFs, TRU from Co-60 ratios (1 page)

Sheet 15, Summary of computed doses (1 page)

L Attached figures:

Figure 1: Fits to whole-body counting data for Worker 1 Figure 2: Chi-square curve for ingestionfmhalation ratio, Worker 1 Figure 3: Best fit to whole-body counting data for Worker 1 Figure 4: Fits to.whole-body c' ounting data for Worker 2 Figure Si Chi-square curve for ingestion / inhalation ratio, Worker 2 Figure 6: Best fit to whole-body counting data for Worker 2 Figure 7: Fits to Co-60 fecal data, Worker 1 '

Figure 8: Fits to Am-241 fecal data, Worker 1 Figure 9: Fits to Co-60 fecal data, Worker 2 Figure 10: Fits to Am-241 fecal data, Worker 2 Figure 11: Worker 1, Chi-square plots for fits to WBC data as a function of particle size Figure 12: Worker 2, Chi-square plots for fits to WBC data as a function of particle size Figure 13: Worker 1, observed and fitted WBC data (20-p AMAD particles)'

Figure 14: Worker 2, observed and fitted WBC data (20-p AMAD particles)

Figure 15: Worker 1, observed and fitted WBC data (both models)

- Figure 16: Worker 2, observed and fitted WBC data (both models)

Figure 17: Worker 1, observed and fitted Co-60 fecal data (20- AMAD particles)

Figure 18: Worker 1, observed and fitted Am-241 fecal data (20-p AMAD particles)

Figure 19: Worker 2, observed and fitted Co-60 fecal data (20- AMAD particles)

Figure 20: Worker 2, observed and fitted Am-241 fecal data (20-p AMAD particles)

CT "snkeeAMs - Sheeft l

Connecticut Yankee Worker 1 WBC-WB IRFs i

Day PI nCi IRF's: Class Y Class W (1 = 0.05 Class Y unwtis Class W unwils ing unwils 0.061 411.1 0.639 0.635 1 262.6929 0.408321 261.0485 0.403225 411.1 1 0 91 343.3 0.596 0.578 ' O.747 204.6068 0.355216 198.4274 0.334084 256.4451 0.558009 2 106.3 0.424 0.423 0.329 45.0712 0.179776 44.9649 0.178929 34.9727 0.108241 3 51.28 0.297 0.308 0.142 15.23016 0.088209 15.79424 0.094864 7.28176 0.020164 4.3 24.59 0.215 0.231 0.054 5.28685 0.046225 5.68029 0.053361 1.32786 0.002916 5.2 18.42 0.186 0.202 0.0326 3.42612 0.034596 3.72084 0.040804 0.600492 0.001063 6.3 16.94 0.171 0.185 0.022 2.89674 0.029241 3.1339 0.034225 0.37268 0.000484 9.1 16.73 0.158 0.166 0.015 2.64334 0.024964 2.77718 0.027556 0.25095 0.000225 10 12.74 0.157 0.163 0.0143 2.00018 0.024649 2.07662 0.026569 0.182182 0.000204 13 11.78 0.155 0.156 0.013 1.8259 0.024025 1.837ES D.024336 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 2.998 3.047 2.3689 545.6802 1.215222 539.4616 1.217953 712 6869 1.691475 Class Y Point estimate Class W Point est Ingest - Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred-int

_6_43.349 647.4016 411.1 0.061 411.1 215.982 211.455 427.7 576.0067 593.9446 459.5716 0.91 343.3 201.448 192.474 319.4919

,250.7075 251.3002 323.1003 2 106.3 143.312 140.859 140.7133 172.6599 166.4935 361.1268 3 51 28 100.386 102.564 60.7334 114.3121 106.4502 455.3704 4.3 24.59 72.67 76.9_23 23.0958 99.03226 91.18812 565.0307 52 18.42 62.868 67.266 13.94302 99.06433 91.56757 770 6.3 16.94 57.798 61.605 9.4094 105.8861 100.7831 1115.333 9.1 16.73 53.404 55.278 6.4155 81.1465 78.15951 890.9091 10 12.74 53.066 54.279 6.11611 76 75.51282 906.1538 13 11.78 52.39 51.948 5.5601 point est 221.8224 220.2801 625.7696 Wtd LSF 337.952 332.5172 427.7006 Unwid LS 449.0375 442.9248 421.3404 _

Pag.i 8/1/97

.. ,.4 CT Yanke::A.Ms Sheeft l I l Combined IRF: 90% ing + 10% Class Y Pt est Day (Adual) Fit ddierence wid sq 0.061 411.1 0.9639 426.4965 3962593 0.929103 0.061 411.1 401.5956 9.504398 0224937 0.91 343.3 0.7319 469.0531 251.2S13 0.535678 0.91 343.3 304.936 38.36399 4.826572 2 106.3 0.3385 314.0325 35.98255 0.114582 2 106.3 141.0313 -34.7313 8.553178 3 5128 0.1575 325.5873 8.0766 0.024806 3 51.28 65.6202 -14.3402 3.13381 4.3 24.59 0.0701 350.7846 1.723759 0.004C14 4.3 24.59 29.2062 -4.6162 0.729614 5.2 18.42 0.04794 384 2303 0.883055 0.002298 5.2 18.42 19.97354 -1.55354 0.120834 6.3 16.94 0.0369 459.0786 0.625086 0.001362 6.3 16.94 15.37387 1.566125 0.15954 9.1 16.73 0.0293 570.9898' O.490189 0.000858 9.1 16.73 12.20744 4.52256 1.675499 10 12.74 0.02857 445.9223 0.363982 0.000816 10 12.74 11.9033 0.836705 0.058814 13 11.78 0.0272 433.0882 0.320416 0.00074 13 11.78 11.3325 0.447496 0.017671 mean 417.9263 895.9862 1.615158 Wld LSF 416.6362 Sum Sqs 19.50047 Unwid LS 430.9091 s C_ombined IRF: 95% Ing + 5% Class Y Pt est Day (Adual) Fit d#ference wid sq 0.061 411.1 0.98195 418.6568 403.6796 0.964226 ~

0.061 411.1 414.4771 -3.37707 0.027516 0 91' 343.3 0.73945 464.264 253.8532 0.546786 0.91 343.3 312.1188 31.18119 3.115052 2 106.3 0.33375 318.5019 35.47763 0.111389 2 106.3 140.8745 -34.5745 8.485542 3 5128 0.14975 342.4374 7.67918 0.022425 3 5128 63.20886 -11.9289 2.251231 4.3 24.59 0.06205 3962933 1.52581 .

0.00385 4.3 24.59 26.19105 -1.60105 0.097872 5.2 _ 18.42 0.04027 457.4125 0.741773 0.001622 5.2 18.42 16.9978 1.422198 0.118995 6.3 16.94 0.02945 575.2122 0.498883 0.000867 6.3 16.94 12.43072 4.509276 1.635751 9.1 16.73 0.02215 755.3047 0.37057 0.000491 9.1, _ 16.73 9.349424 7.380576 5.826337 10 12.74 0.021435 594.355 0.273082 0.000459 10 12.74 9.04'.'626 3.692374 1.506874 13 11.78 0.0201 586.0697 0.236778 0.000404 13 11.78 8.484128 3 295872 1 280364 mean 490.8507 704.3365 1.652519 Wtd LSF 422.0959 Sum Sqs 24.34553

~~

Unwid LS 426.2198 Page 2 8/1/97, i . . . .

CT Ycnk=A.Ms Sh;ett i

m,,'=.-

Coinbined IRF: 97% Ing + 3% Class Y Pt est Day (Actual) Fit difference wid sq

_0061 411.1 0.98917 415.601 406.6478 0.978457 0 061 411.1 419.7247 -8.62468 0.177224 0.91 343.3 0.74247 462.3756 254.89 0.551262 ,_

0.91 343.3 315.0449 28.25508 2.534082 2 106.3 0.33185 320.3254 35.27566 0.110124 2 106.3 140.8106 -34.5106 8.458045 3 51.28 0.14665 349.6761 7.520212 0.021506 3 51.28 62.22654 -10.9465 1.925653 4.3 24.59 0.05883 417.984 1.44663 0.003461 4.3 24.59 24.96275 -0.37275 0.005566 5.2 18.42 0.037202 495.1347 0.685261 0.001384 5.2 18.42 15.78556 2.634445 C.439661 6.3 16.94 0.02647 639.9698 0.44o402 0.000701 '33 16.94 11.23175 5.708248 2.901069 9.1 16.73 0.01999 867.2888 0.322722 0.000372 9.1 16.73 S.185134 8.544866 8.920408 10 12.74 0.018581 685.6466 0.236722 0.0003/3 10 12.74 7.884291 4.855709 2.990492 13 11.78 0.01726 682.5029 0.203323 0.000298 13 11.78 7.323764 4.456236 2.711452 mean 533.6505 707.6767 1.667911 Wd LSF 424.3201 Sum Sqs 31.06365 Unwid LS 424.2893 j Cordined IRF: 80% Ing + 20% Class Y Pt est Day (Actual) Fit difference wid sq 0.061 411.1 0.9278 443.0912 381.4186 0.860813 0.061 411.1 376.8072 34.29282 3.120953 0.91 343.3 0.7168 478.9J42 246.0774 0.513802 0.91 343.3 291.1138 52.1862 9.355102 2 106.3 0.348 305.4598 36.9924 0.121104 l 2 106.3 141.3332 -35.0332 8.683891 3 51.28 0.173 296.4162 8.87144 0.029929 3 51.28 70.26045 -18.9804 5.127456

~

4.3 24.59 0.0862 285.2668 2.119658 0.00743 ~

f3 24.59 35.00338 -10.4184 3.100478 5.2 18.42 0.06328 291.0872 1.165618 0.004004 18.42 25.69989 -7.27989 2.062141 6.3 16.94 0.0518 327.027 0.877492 0.002683 6.3 16.94 21.03752 -4.09752 0.798082 9.1 16.73 0.0436 383.7156 0.729428 0.001901 /, 9.1 16.73 17.70726 -0.97726 0.053934 10 12.74 0.04284 297.3856 0.545782 0.001835 10 12.74 17.3986 -4.6586 1.247373 13 11.78 0.0414 284.5411 0.487692 0.001714 s 13 11.78 16.81377 -5.03377 1.50703

}

mean 339.2925 679.2855 1.545216 Wd LSF 406.1297 Sum Sqs_ 35.05644 Unwid LS 439.6055 Page 3 8/1/97

CT YankscA.Ms Sheett i I I~

Combined IRF: 85% log + 15% Class Y Pt est - Day (Actual) Fit ddlerence wid sq 0.061 411.1 0.94585 434.6355 388.8389 0.894632 0.061 411.1 383.0431 22.05688 1.250519 0.91 343.3 0.72435 473.9422 248.6694 0.524683 0.91 343.3 297.9367 45.36335 6.906948 j

_ 2 106.3 0.34325 309.6868 36.48748 0.117821 2 106.3 141.1842 -34.8842 8.619278 3 51.28 0.16525 310.3177 8.47402 0.027308 3 51.28 67.96995 -13.6899 4.098199 4.3 24.59 0.07815 314.6513 1.921709 0.006107 4.3 24.59 32.14434 -7.55434 1.775367 5.2 18.42 0.05561 331.2354 1.024336 0.003092 5.2 18.42 22.87328 -4.45328 0.867023 6.3 16.94 0.04435 381.9617 0.751289 0.001967 6.3 16.94 18.24186 -1.30186 0.092909 9.1, 16.73 0.03645 458.9849 0.609809 0.001329 9.1 16.73 14.93246 1.737536 020137 10 12.74 0.035705 356.8128 0.454882 0.001275 10 12.74 14.68603 -1.94603 0.257867 13 11.78 0.0343 343.4402 0.404054 0.001176 13 11.78 14.10813 -2.32813 0.38419 mean 371.5668 687.6359 1.57939 Wtd LSF 4 e 1.3159 Sum Sqs 24.45367 Unwid LS 435.3807 Combined IRF: 100% ing Pt est Day (Actual) Fit dWference wid sq 0.061 411.1 1 411.1 411.1 1 0.061 411.1 427.7006 -16.6006 0.644331 0.9I 343.3 0.747 459.5716 256.4451 0.558009 0.91 343.3 319.4924 23.80764 1.774075

~5 106.3 0.329 323.1003 34.9727 0.108241 2 106.3 140.7135 -34.4136 8.416316 3 51.28 0.142 361.1268 7 28176 0.020164 3 51.28 60.73349 -9.45349 ~1.471485 4.3 24.59 0.054 455.3704 1.32786 0.002916 4.3 24.59 23.09583 1.494166 0.096664 5.2 18.42 0.0326 565.0307 0.600492 0.001063 52 18.42 13.94304 4.47696 1.437503 63 16.94 0.022 770 0.37268 0.000484 C.3 16.94 9.409414 7.530586 6.026914 9.1 16.73 0 015 '1115.333 0.25095 0.000225 9.1 16.73 6.415509 10.31449 16.58305 10 12.74 0.0143 890.9091 0.182182 0.000204 10 12.74 6.116119 6.623881 7.173798 13 11.78 0.013 906.1538 0.15314 0.000169 13 11.78 5.560108 6.219892 6.957968 nh.an 625.7696 712.6869 1.691475 Wld LSF 427.7006 Sum Sqs 50.58211 Unwid LS 421.3404 Page 4 8/1/97

, *I CT YankeeA.;ds Sheet 1 l r

._ i l 1

~

Pt est Day (ActuaQ FR ddference wid sq j Combined IRF: 87% ing

• 13% Class Y 411.1 _ 3.95307 4313429 391.8071 0.908342 0.061 411.1 394.0254 17.07455 0.739902

_ 0.061 6.030618 0 91 3133 0.72737 471.9744 249.7061 0.529067 0.91 343.3 300.7148 4238516 0.34135 311.4106 0.11652 2 106.3 141.1235 -34.8235 8.593019 2 136 3 _36 28551 0.16215 3162504 8 315052 0.026293 51.28 67.03729 -15.7573 3.70379 3 E1.28 3. .

328.173 1.842529 0.005615 4.3' 24.59 30.97813 -6 38813 1 317323 4.3 24.59 0.07493 52 18.42 0.052542 s 350.5767 0.967824 0002761 52 18.42 21.72231 -330231 0.502031

-!D9.4755 0.700808 0.C01711 63 16 34 17.1035 -0.1635 0.001563 6.3 16.94 0.04137 _

' 16.73 13.8A703 2.842967 0.582015 9.1 16.73 0.03359 498.0649 0.561961 0.001128 9.1 12.74 0.032851 387.8116 0.418522 0.001079 10 12.74 13.58151 -0.84157: 0 05214 10 13 11.78 0.03146 374.4437 037d599 0.00099 13 11.78 13.00643 -122643' J.115646 mean 387.9524 690.976 1.593500 1Md LSF 413.4276 Sum Sqs 21.63805 Unwid LS 433.62 Pt est Day (ActuaQ FR dWierence wid sq Combined IRF: 92% Ing + 8% Class Y 0.97112 4233256 399 2274 0.943074 0.061 411.1 406.708 4 392008 0 047429 0061 411 1 343 3 0.73492, 467.1257 252.298 0.540107 O.91 3433 307.7867 35.51328 4.097621 0.91 _

2 106 3 315.8051 35.78058 0.1133 2 1063 140.9691 -34.6691 8.526311 0.333 8 3 51.28 332.1244 7.917632 0 023839 3 5128 E4.66319 -133832 2.769887 0.15d4J _

367.6734 1.644579 0.004473 4.3 24.59 28.00955 -3.41955 0.417475 4.3 24.59 0.06688 410.501 0.826542 0.002013 52 18.42 18.79253 -037253 0.007385 5.2 18.42 0.044872 0.03392 499.4104 0.574605 0.001151 63 16.94 14 2058 2.734201 0.526254 6.3 16.94 632.7534 0.442341 0.000699 9.1 16.73 11.07315 5.656848 2.889866 9.1 16.73 0.02644 495 4114 0327622 0.000661 10 1:2.74 10.76994 1.970061 0.360368 10 12.74 0.025716 483.5796 0286961 0.000593 13 11.78 1020204 1.577958 0244064 13 11.78 0.02436.

mean 442.771 699 3263. 1.629911 WtdLSF 418.803 Sum Sqs 19.85666 Unwid LS 429.0579 l

)

Page5 8/1/97 l_- -

CT YankeeA.Ms Sheeft l l 1 1  !

Combined IRF: 83% ing - 12% Class Y Pt est Day (Actual) fFR diference wtd sq 0 0_61 411.1 0.95668 429.7153 3932911 0.915231 0.061 411.1 396.5358 14.56416 0.534919 0 91 343.3 0.72888 410.9966 2502245 0.531266 0.91 3433 302.1147 41.18535 5.614534

~

2 103.3 0 3404 3?? 2797 36.18452 0.115872 2 1063 141.0929 -34.1929 8.579799

_ 3 5125 0.1606 3193026 8 235568 0.025792 3 5128 66.56735 -152874 3.510778 43 '

24.55 0.07332 3353792 1.802939 0 005376 4.3 24.59 30.39053 -5 E9053 1.107125 52 1842 0 051008 361.119E .

0.939567 0.002602 52 18.4f~25.14239 -2.72239 03505U 6.3 16 94 0.03988 424.7742 0675567 0.00159 6.3 16.94 )~52993 0 410074 0.010173 9.1 16.73 0 03216 5202114 0.538337 0.001034 9.1 16.72 13.33005 339995 0.867188 10 12.74 0.031424 405.4226 f_

0.400342 0000957 10 12.74 13.02498 -028498 0.006235 13 11.78 0 03004 392.1438 0353871 0.000902 13 11.78 12.45133 -0.67133 0.036195 mean 397.1345 692.6461 1.600659 Wid LSF 414.4916 Sum Sqs 20 61749 6

Unwtd LS 432.7255 C;7;nbined ERF: 89% Ing + 11% Class Y Pt est Day (Actual) FR difference wtd sg_

0.061 411.1 096029 428.0998 394.7752 0.922157 0.061 411.1 399.0592 12.04081 0.363307 0 91 343.3 023039 470.0229 250.7429 0.53347 0.91 2*33 303.5217 39.77831 5 213182 2 106.3 0.33945 313.1536 36.08354 0.115226 2 1 3 141.0622 -34.7622 8.566519 3 5128 0.15905 322.4143 8.156084 0.025297 3 51.28 66.095 -14 815 3320738

~

4.3 24.59 0.07171 342.9089 1.763349 0.005142 4.J 24.59 29.79989 -520989 0.91084

~

5.2 18.42 0.049474 372.3168 0 911311 0.002448 52 18.42 20.55947 -2.13947 0222639 63 16.94 0.03539 4412607 0.650327 0.001474 6.3 16.94 15.95339 0.986608 0.061015 9.1 16.73 0.03073 544.4191 0.514113 0.000944 9.1 16.73 12.77019 3.959807 1227865 10 12.74 0.029997 424.7091 0.382162 0.0009 10 12.74 12.46559 0.274413 0.006041 13 11.78 0,02862 411.6003 0337144 0.000819 13 11.78 11.89336 -0.11336 0.00108 mean 407.0906 694.3161 1.607877 Wtd LSF 415.5611 Sum Sqs 19.89323 Unwid LS 431.8218 Page 6 8/1/97

CT YankeeAAs Sheet 1 I I I Combined IRF- 91% Ing + 9% Class Y Pt est Day (Actua.') FR diference wid sa

_ 0 061 411.1 0.96751 424.9052 397.7434 0.936076 0.061 411.1 404.1452 6.954833 0.119684 0.91 343.3 0.73341 468.0874 251.7797 0.53789 0.91 343.3 306.3577 36.54233 4.454714 2 106.3 0.33755 314.9163 35.88157 0.11394 2 106.3 141.0003 -34.7003 8.539775 3 5128 0.15595 328.8233 7.997116 0.02432 3 5128 65.14293 -13.8629 2.950142

__ 4.3 74.59 0.06849 359.0305 1.684169 0.004691 4.3 24.59 28.60942 -4.01942 0.564701 52 18 42 0.046406 396 9314 0.854799 0.002154 5.2 18.42 19.38457 -0.96457 0.047996 63, 16.94 0.03541 478.3959 0.599845 0.001254 6.3 16.94 14.79135 2.148649 0.312121 9.1 16.73 0.02787 600287 0.466265 0.000777 9.1 16.73 11.64177 5.088233 2.223899 10 12.74 0.027143 469.366 C345802 0 000737 10 ".74 11.33809 1.401913 0.173341 13 11.78 0.02578 456.9434 0.303688 0.000665 13 :1.78 10.76874 1.011261 0.094965 mean 429.7686 697.6563 1.622503 Wtd LSF 417.7168 Sum Sqs 19.48134 Unwid LS 429.9878 i

l Predicted values from best fit at 91% ingestion + ?% inhalation Class Y Class W Day Actual Predicted Day Actual Predicted 0.061 411.1 404.1452 0.061 411.1 401.0191 0 91 343.3 306.3577 0.91 343.3 303.4294 2 106.3 141.0003 2 106.3 139.9244 3 5128 65.14293 3 5128 65.0736 4.3 24.59 28.60942 4.3 24.59 28.99578 5.2 18.42 19.38457 52 18.42 19.83887 6.3 16.94 14.79135 6.3 16.94 1520485 9.1 16.73 11.64177 9.1 16.73 11.85456

' ~

10 _

12.74 11.33809 10 12.74 11.47848 13 11.78 10.76874 13 11.78 10.72674 So best estimate of intake for 1 micron AMAD particles from WBO is 417.7 nCi. of which 380.1 nCiis ingestion and 37.6 nCiis hhalation of Class Y material.

Page 7 8/1/97

CT YaniteeA.Ms Sheet 1 I

What i Class W7 i

ComtMned IRF: 91% Ing + 9% Class W Pt est Day (Adual) FR d4ference wed sq _,

0061 411.1 0.96715 425.0633 397.5954 0.935379 . 0.061 411.1 4032616 7.838408 0.15235d 0.91 343.3 0.73179 469.1237 251 2235 n.535517 0.91 343.3 305.1262 38.1738 4.775858 2 106.3 0.33746 315.0003 35.872 0.113879 2 106.3 140.7069 -34.4069 8.413471 3 51.28 0.15694 326.7491 ,

8.047883 0.02463 3 5128 65.4375 -14.1575 3.062995 4.3 24.59 0.06993 351.6374 1.719579 0.00489 4.3 24.59 29.15792 -4.56792 0.715617 52 18.42 0.047846 384.9852 0.881323 0.002289 _ 32 18.42 19.94961 -1.52981 0.11731 6.3 16.94 0.03667 461.958 0.62119 0.001345 ~3 16.94 1528987 1.650125 0.178086 9.1 16.73 0.02859 585.1696 0.478311 0.000817 9.1 16.73 11.92085 4.809151 1.940125 to 12.74 0.027683 460.2102 0.352681 OLA766 10 12.74 11.54267 1.197333 0.124201 13 11.78 0.02587 455.3537 0.304749 0.000669 13 11.78 ' 10.78672 0.993279 0.091465 mean 423.525 697.0966 1.620182 Wid LSF 416.9587 Sum Sqs 19.37149 Unwed LS 430 2581 not as good as Class Y Assume 380 nCiingestion (WBC data) + 99 nClinhaled class Y glecal data)

Day Actual Prededed difference wed sq 0.061 411.1 443.261 32.161 2.333456 0.91 343.3 342 864 -0.436 0.000554 2 106.3 166.996 60.696 22.06044

_ 5128 83.363 3 32.083 12.34743 _

4.3 24.59 41.805 17215 7.089014 5.2 18.42 30.802 12.382 4.977402 6.3 16.94 25289 8.349 2.756368 9.1 16.73 21.342 4.612 0.996652 10 12.74 20.977 8237 3 234402 13 11.78 20285 8.505 3.565937 Sum Sqs 59.361_b6 not as good as it only to WBC data Page 8 8/1/97

i

.~\

CT YankeeAals Sheet 2 l l

Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC .- . -- - -_

Day Pt nCi IRIrs: Class Y . Class W f t = 0.05 .

Class Y unwils . Class W unwits ingestion unwits 0.065 1080 0.639 0.635 1 690.12 0.408321 685.8 0.403225 1080 1 j 0 27 990.5.. 0.637 0.627 0.981 _630.9485 0.405769 621.0435 0393129 971.6805., 0.962361 2 174.2 _

0.424 0.423 0329 73.8608 0.179776 73.6866 0.178929 572118 0.108241 3 40.47 0.297 0308 0.142 12.01959 0.088209 12.46476 0.094864 5.74674 0.020164 4.3 - 30 33 0215_ 0231 0.054 6.52095 0.046225 7.00623 0.053361 1.63782 0.002916 52 23.21 0.186 0202 0 0326 4.31706 0.034596 4.68842 0 040804 0.756646 0.001063

~

6.3 23.1 0.171 0.185 0.022 3.9501 0.029241 42735 0.034225 0.5082 0.000484 li2 20.79 0.158 0.165 0.015 3 28482 0.024964 3.43035 0.027225 0 31185 0.000225 i03 265f 0.15} 0.162 0.0142 324519 0.024649 3.34854 0.026244 0 293514 0.C00202 12.3 20.75 0.156 0.157 0.0133 3237 0.024336 3.25775 0.024649 0275975 0.000177 13.2 21.64 0.155 0.155 0.0129 33542 0.024025 3.3542 0.024025 0 279156 0.000166 if3 21' O.153 0.146 0.0113 3213 0.023409 3.066 0.021316 02373 0.000128' 18 16.88 0.153 0.144 0.011 2.58264 0.023409 2.43072 0.020736 0.18568 0.000121 19 17.62 0.152 0.142 0.0106 2.67824 0.023104 2.50204 0.020164 0.186772 0.000112'

, Sum 2501.16' 3.653 3.682 2.6489 1443.332 1.360033 1430.353 1.362896 2119.412 2.09636 Class Y Point estimate Class W Point est ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred.Ing_

_1690.141 1700.787 1080 0.065 1080 437.5233 4313555 9442 1554.945 1579.745 1009.684 027 990.5 436.1539 425.9211 9262602 410.8491 411.8203 529.4833 2 174 2 290.3128 287.3439 310.6418 136.2626 131 3961 285 3 40.47 203.3559 2092244 134.0764 141.0698 131.2987 561.6667 43 30.33 1472105 156.9183 50.9868 124.7849 114 301 711.9632 52 2321 127.3542 1372186'~ 30.78 72 135.0877 124.8649 1050 63 23.1 117.0837 125.6705 20.T.'Y4 131.5823 126 1386 9.2 20.79 108.1826 112.0845 14.163 131.6561 127.5926 1455.634 10.3 20.67 107.4979 110.0466 13.40764 133.0128 132.1656 1560.16 12.3 20.75 106.8132 106.6501 12.55786 139.6129 139.6129 1677.519 132 21.64 106.1285 1052915 12.18018 1372549 143.8356 1858.407 17.2 21 104.7591 99.1778 10.66946 110 3268 117.2222 1534.545 18 16.88 104.7591 97.8192 102862 115.9211 124.0845 1662264 19 17.62 104.0744 96.4606 10.00852

~ '-'

p5 int est 363.7505 '

364.6662' 1168.737 ~

WULSF 684.6866 679.2939 '944 2259 Unwid LS 1061.248 1049.495 1010.996 _

Page 1 8/1/97

,o CT YankeeAMs Sheet 2 l_ _l l l Combined RF: 90% ing + 10% Class Y of est . Day Actual FR .. difference wid squar

, O _06_5 1080 -0.9639 _

1120.448 .

1041.012 0.929103 0.065 1080 876.8993 203.1007 47.04061 0 27 990.5 0.9466 1046.377 937.6073 0.896052. 027 990.5 861.1608 129.3392 19.42567 2 1742 0.3385 514.6233 58.9667 0.114582 2 1742 307.9473 . -133.747 58.08898 3 .

40 47 0.1575 256.9524 6.374025 0.024806 3 40.47 1432842 -102.814 73.77478 4.3 30.33 0.0701 432L6_76 2.126133 0 004914 4.3 30.33 63.77284 -33.4428 17.53762 52 _ 23.21 - 0.04794 484.1'69 1.112687, 0.002298 5.2 2321 43.61298 -20.403 9.544904 6.3 23.1 0.0369 626.0103 0 85239 0.001362 6.3 23.1 33.56944 -10.4694 3265149 92 20.79 0.0293 , _709.5563 0.609147 .

0.000858 92 20.79 26.65541 -5.86541 1.290659 10.3 20.67 0.02848 725.7725 0.588682 0.000811 10.3 20.67 25.90942 -523942 1.05952 12.3 20.75 0.02757 752.6297 0.572078 0.00076 12.3 20.75 25.08156 -4.33156 0.748056 13 2 21 64 0.02711 7982294 0.58666 0.000735 .

132 21.64 24.66308 -3.02308 0.370554 17.2 21 0.02547 824.4994 0.53487 0.000649 172 21 23.1711 -2.1711 020343 18 .

16.88 0.0252 , 669.0413 0.425376 0.000635 18 16.88 22.92547 -6.04'i47 1.594198 19 11.62 0.02474 712207 0.435919. iOOO612 19 17.62 22.50699 -4.886 5 1.061123 mean 690.9976 Sums 2051.804 1.978178 Wld LSF 909.741 Sum Sqs 235.0052 Unwid LS 1037.219 Chbined RF: 95% ing + 5% Class Y Pt est Unwid LSF Wid fR Actual FR ddference wtd squar 0.065 1080 0.98195 1099.852 1060.506 0.964226 909.9731 0.065 1080 909.9365 170.0635 31.7842 0.27 990.5 0.9638 1027.703 954.6439 0.92891 893.1535 027 990.5 893.1175 97.38246 10.61825 2 174.2 0.33375 521.9476 58.13925 0.111389 309.2861 2 1742 309.2737' -135.074 58.99273 3 40.47 0.14975 270 2504 6.060383 0.022425 138.7733 3 40.47 138.7677 -982977 69.63035 4.3 30.33 0.06205 488.7994 1.881977 0.00385 57.50174 4.3 30.33 57.49942 -27.1694 12.838 5.2 23.21 0.04027 576.3596 0.934667 0.001622 37.31821 52 2321 37.31671 -14.1067 5.332711 6.3 23.1 0.02945 784.3803 0.680295 0.000867 2729132 6.3 23.1 27.29022 -4.19022 0.643378 92 20.79 0.02215 938.6005 0.460499 0.000491 2032641 92 20.79 20.52558 0264421 0.003406 10.3 .

20.67 0.02134 _968.6036 0.441098 0.000455 19.77578 10.3 20.67 19.77498 0.895017 0.040509 12.3 20.75 0.02r135 .015.415 0.424026 0.000418 18.93711 12.3 20.75 18.93635 1.813647 0.173704 13.2 21.64 0.020005 1081.73 0.432908 0.0004 18.53863 132 21.64 18.53789 3.102112 0.519104 17.2 21 0.018385 1142236 0.386085 0.000338 17.03738 172 21 17.03669 3.963306. 0.921998 18 .

16.88 0.0181 932.5967 0.305528 0.000328 16.77327 18 16.88 16.7126 0.107405 0.000688 19 17.62 0.01767 997.1703 0.311345 0.000312 16.37479 19 17.62 16.37413, 124587 0.094795 mean 846.1174 2085.608 2.036031 Wld LSF 926.6627 Sum Sqs 191.5938 Unwid LS 1024.35 Page 2 8/1/97

CT YankeeA ads Sheet 2 i l i I .

Combined IRF: 97% Ing + 3% Class Y P1 est Day Actual FR difference wtd squar 0065 1080 0.98917 1091.824 .068.304 0.978457 0.065 1080 923.498 156.502 26.52184 0 27 990.5 0.97068 1020.419 961.4585 _ 0.94222 027 990.5 906 2356 8426441 7.835149 2 174 2 0.33185 524.936 57.80827 0.110124 2 174 2 309.8181 -135.618 59.36477 3 40.47 0.14665 275.9632 5.934926 0.021506 3 40.47 136.9138 -96.4438 67.93619 4.3 30.33 0.05883 515.5533 1.784314 0.003461 4.3 30.33 54.92422 -24.5942 11.01291 52 23.21 0.037202 623 8912 0.863458 0.001384 5.2 2321 34.73212 -11.5221 3.822378 6.3 23.1 0.02647 _

872.6861_ 0611457 0.000701 6.3 23.1 24.71263 -1.61263 0.105233 9 2, 20.79 0.01929 1077.76 0.401039 0.000372 9.2 20.79 18.00932 2.730682 0.429344 10.3 20.67 0.018484 1118.264 0.382064 0.000342 10.3 20.67 1725683 3.413171 0.67508 12.3 20.75 0.017581 1180.251 0.364806 7000309 12.3 20.75 16.41378 4.33622 1.14555 13.2 21.64 0.017163 1260.852 0.371407 0.000295 132 21.64 16.02353 5.616469 1.96865 17.2 21 0.015551 1350.395 0.326571 0.000242 172 21 14.51855 6.481446 2.89348 18 16.88 0.01526 1106.16 0.257589 0.000233 18 16.88 1424687 2.633127 0.486658 19 17.62 0.014842 1187.172 0.261516 0.00022 19 17.62 13.85662 3.76375 ' 1.02211 mean 9432949 2099.13 2.059866 Wid LSF 933.609 Sum Sqs 1852193 l

Unw1d LS 1019.061 Combined IRF: 80% Ing + 20% Class Y Pt est Day Adual FR ' difference .wtd squar 0065 1080 0.9278 1164.044. 1002.024 0.860813 0.065 1080 835.9125 244.0875 7127388

_ 0 27 990.5 0.9122 1085.836 903.5341 0.832109 027. 990.5 821.8575 168.6425 34.60492 2 174 2 0.348 500.5747 60.6216 0.121104 2 174 2 313.5347 -139.335 61.92032 3 40.47 0.173 233.9306 7.00131 0.029929 3 40.47 155.8664 -115.396 85.43426 4.3 30.33 0.0862 351.8561 2.614446 0.00743 4.3 30.33 77.66292 -47.3329 28.84781 5.2 .

2321 0.06328 _

366.7826 .

1.468729 0.004004 52 2321 57.01287 -33.8029 20.04169 6.3 .?3.1 0.0518. 445.9459 1.19658 0.002683 6.3 23.1 46.66983 -23.5698 11.90355 92 20.79 0.0436 476.8349 0.906444 0.001901 92 20.79 39.28194 -18.4919 8.705065 10.3 20.67 0.04276 483.3957 0.883849 0.001828 10.3 20.6i 38.52513 -17.8551 8 275266 1U 20.75 0.04184 495.9369 0.86818 0.001751 12.3 20.75 37.69625 -16.9462 7.61814 13 2 21.64 0.04132 523.7173 0.894165 0.001707 132 21.64 3722775 -15.5877 6.526794 173 21 0.03964 ' 529.7679 0.83244' O.001571 17.2 21 35.71413 -14.7141 6.062184

_ _18 16.88 0.0394 428.4264 ,

0.665072 0.001552 18 16.88' 3i4979 -18.6179, 9.764695 19 17.62. 0.03888 453.1893 0.685066 0.001312 19 17.62 35.0294 -17.4094 8.652366 mean 538.5885 1984.196 1.869895 Wtd LSF 900.9619 Sum Sqs 369.6309 Unwid LS 1061.127 i t

Page 3 8/1/97

CT YankeeA;ds Shee12 I I i Combined IRF: 85% Ing + 15% Class Y Pt est Day Adual FR ' ddference (*squar 0065 1080 0.94585 1141.83 1021.518 0.894632 0.065 1080 845.0472 234.9523 bi.32516 0 27 990.5 0.9294 1065.741 920.5707 0.863784 027 990.5 830.3503 160.1497 30.88808 ,

2 174 2 0.34325 507.5018 59.79415 0.117821 2 1742 306.6685 -132.469 5722111 3 40.47 0.16525 244.9017 6.687668 0.027308 3 40.47 147.6387 -107.169 77.79212 4.3 30 33 0.07815 388.0998 2.37029 0.006107 4.3 30.33 69.82126 -39.4913 22.J3645 52 23.21 0.05561 417.371 _

1 290708 0.003092 5.2 2321 49.68343 -26.4734 14.10616 6.3 23.1 0.04435 520.8568, 1.024485 0.001967 6.3 23.1 39.62345 -16.5235 6.890476 92 20.79 0.03645 570.3704 0.757796 0.001329 92 20.79 32.56538 -11.7754 4.257885 10.3 20.67 0.03562 580292 0.736265 0.001269 10.3 20.67 31.82384 -11.1538 3.909276 12.3 20.75 0.034705 597.8966 0.720129 0.001204 12.3 20.75 31.00636 -10.2564 3.392622 13.2 21.64 0.034215 632.4711 0.740413 0.001171 13 2 21.64 30.56858 -8.92858 2.60789 17.2 21 0.032555 645.0622 O.683655 0.00106 172 21 29.08549 -8.08549 2 247689 18 16 88 0.0323 522.6006 0.545224 0.001043 18 16.88 28.85767 -11.9777 4.971451 19 17.62 0.03181 553.9139 0.560492 0.001012 19 17.62 28.41989 -10.7999 4.104082 mean 599.2078 2018 1.922799 Wtd LSF 893.4262 Sum Sqs 300.0505 Unwid LS 1049.512 _

Combined IRF: 100% Ing Pt est Day Adual FR ddference wtd squar 0 065 1080 1 1080 1080 1 0.065 1080 944 2259 135.7741 19.52351 027 990.5 0.981 1009.684 971.6805 0.962361 027 990.5 926.2856 64 21439 4.451637 2 174.2 0.329 529.4833 57.3118 v.iOS241 2 174 2 310.6503 -136.45 59.93456 3 40.47 0.142 285 5.74674 0.020164 3 40.47 134.0801 -93.6101 65.35532 43 30.33 .

0.054 .

561.6667 1.63782 0.002916 4.3 30.33 50.9882 -20.6582 8.369803  ;

5.2 2321 0.0326 711.9632 0.756646 0.001063 52 23.21 30.78176 -7.57176 1.862519 ,

6.3 .

23.1 0.022 1050 0.5082 0.000484 6.3 23.1 20.77297 2.32703 0260679 9.2 20.79 0.01s 1386 0.31185 0.000225 9.2 20.79 14.16339 6.626611 3.100387 10.3 20.67 0.0142 1455.634 0293514 0.000202 10.3 20.67 13.40801 7261992 3.933211 12.3 20.75 0.0133 1560.15 0.275975 0.000177 12.3 20.75 12.5582 8.191795 5.343559  !

13 2 21.64 0.0129 1677.519 0279156 0.000166 13 2 21.64 12.18051 9.459486 7.346313  !

172 21 0.0113 1858.407 02373 0.000128 172 21 10.66975 10.33025 10.00154 18 16.88 0 011 1534.545 0.18568 0.000121 18 16.88 10.38648 6.493515 4.059673 19 17.62 0.0106 1662264 0.186772 0.000112 19 17.62 10.00879 7.611205 5.787955 mean 1168.737 2119.412 2.09636 Wtd LSF 944.2259 Sum Sqs 199.3307 Unwtd LS 1010.996 . _

Page 4 8/1/97

CT YankeeAAs Sheet 2 i i I Combened RF: 87% ing + 13% Class Y P1 est Day Actual FR dMerence wid squar 0.065 1080 0.95307 1133.18 1029.316 0.908342 0 065 1080 857.6499 222.3501 57.64537 0 27 990.5 0.93628 1057.91 ' 927.3853 0.87662 0.27 990.5 842.5409 147.95917 5.98317 2 174 2 0.34135 5103266 59.46317 0.11652 2 174 2 307.1745 -132.975 57.56409 3 40.47 0.16215 249.5837,. 6.552211 0.026293 3 40.47 145.9158 -105.446 76 20019 43 .

30.33 0.07493 404.7778 2272627 0.005615 4.3 30.33 67.42811 -37.0981 20.41092 52,, 2321 0.052542 441.7418 12195 0.002761 5.2 2321 47.28157 -24.0716 122551 63 23.1 0 04137 5583756 0.955647 0.001711 63 23.1 37.22809 -14.1281 5361623 92 20.79 0.03359 618.9342 0.698336 0.001128 92 20.79 30.22702 -9.43702 2.94628 10.3 20.67 0.032764 630 8754 0.677232 0.001073 10.3 20.67 29.48371 -8.81371 2.634727 12.3 20.75 0.031851 651.4709 0.660908 0.001014 123 20.75 28.66212 -7.91212 2.184126 13.2,. 21 64 0.031373 689.7651 0.678912 0.000984 132 21.64 2823198 -6.59198 1.539183 17.2 21 0.029721 706.5711 0.624141 0.000883 172 21 26.74537 -5.74537 12342C7 18 _ 16.88 0.02946 572.9803 0.497285 0.000868 18 16.88 26.51051 -9.63051 3.498486 19 1/.62 0.028982 607.9636 0.510663 0.00084 19 17.62 26.08036 -8.46036 2.744507 mean 631.0326 2031.522 1.944653 Wid LSF 899.8814 Sum Sqs 272202 Unwid LS 1044.67 Combined IRF: 92% ing + 8% Class Y Pt est Day Actual FA deerence wid squar

~ 0.065 1080 0.97112 1112.118 1048.81 0.943074 0.065 1080 889.9683 190.0317 40.57676

~

027 990.5 0.95348 1038.826 944.4219 0.909124 027 990.5 873.8024 116.6976 15.58513 2 174 2 03366 517.5282 58.63572 0.1133 2 1742 308.472 -134 272 58.44606

~

3 40.47 0.1544 262.1114 6248568 0.023839 3 40.47 141.4976 -101.028 72.13247 4.3 3033 0.06688 453.4986 2.02847 0.004473 43, 3033 6129117 -30.9612 15.64

~

5.2 '

2321 0.044872 517.2491 1.041479 0.002013 52 2321 41.12227 -17.9123 7.802328 6.3 23.1 0.03392 681.0142 0.7835523 001151 63 23.1 31.08547 -7.98547 2.05157 9I 20.79 0.02644 786 3086 - , 0.549688 0.000699 92 20.79 24 23054 -3.44055 0.488529

_ 10.3 20.67 0.025624 806.6656 ' O.529648 0.000657 10.3 20.67 23.482/3 -2.81273 0.336905

_ 123 20.75 0.024716 839.5371 0.512857 0.000611 123 20.75 22.65061, -1.90061 0.159479 13 2 21.64 0.024268 .

891.7092 0.52516 0.000589 132 21.64 22.24004 -0.60004 c.016189 17.2 21 0.022636 927.7257 0.475356 0.000512 172 21 20.74442 0 255578 0.003149

_ 18 16.88 0.02236 754.9195 0377437 0.0005 18 16.88 20.49149 -3.61149 0.6365 19 17.62 0.021912 804.125G 0.386089 0.00048 19 17.62 20.08092 -2.46092 0301587 mean 742.3812 2065.326 2.001022 _

Wtd LSF 916.435 Sum Sqs_ 214.1765 Unwid LS 1032.135 Page5 8/1/97

CT YankeeA.)fs Sheet 2 Combined IRF: 96% Ing + 4% Class Y Pt est Day Actual FX ddference wtd squ_ar_

0065 1080 0.98?,56 1095.824. 1064.405. 0.971329 0.065 1080 916.6919 163.3081 29.09323 027 990.5 0.96724 1024.048 958.0512 0.935553 027 990.5 899.6521 90.84793 9.173931 2 174 2 0 3328 523.4375 57.97376 .

0.110756, 2 174.2 309.5449 -135.345 59.17798 3 40.47 0.1482 273.0769 5 997654 0.021963 3 40.47 . 137.8442 -97.3742 68.78589 4.3 30 33 0.06044 501.82 1.833145 0.003653 4.3 30.33 56.21663 -25.8866 11.92027 52 2321 0.038736 599.1842 0.899063 0.0015 52 23 21 36.02924 -12.8192 4.561099 6.3 23 1 0 02796 826.1803 0645876 0.000782 6.3 23.1 26.00624 -2.90624 0.324776 92 20.79 0 02072 1003.378 0.430769. 0.000429 92 20.79 19.27215 1.517854 0.119545 10.3 20 67 0.019912 1038 067 0.411581 0.0003 % 10.3 20 67 18.52061 2.149393 0.249446 12.3 20.75 0.019008 1091.646 0.39-4416 0.000361 12.3 20.75 17.67978 3.070224 0.533167 13 2 21.64 0.018584 1164.443 0.402158 0.000345 132 21.64 172854 4.354596 1.097024 17.2 21 0.016968 1237.624 O.356328 0.000288 172 21 15.78233 5.217675 1.724976 18 16 88 0.01668 1011.99 0281558 0.000278 18 16.88 15.51445 1.36555 0.120193 19 17.62 0 016256 1083.907 0.286431 0.000264 19 17.62 15.12008 2.499922' O.4133U mean 891 043 --

2092.369 2.047899 Wtd LSF 930.1229 Sum Sqs 1872949 Unwid LS 1021.715 Combined IRF; 98% ing + 2% Cisss Y Pt est .

Day Actual FX difference wid squar 0065 1080 0.99278 1087.854 10722C' O.985612 0.065 1080 930.3553 149.6447 24.06987 027 990.5 0.97412 1016.815 964.8659 0.94891 0.27 990.5 912.8686 77.63136 6.601856 2 174 2 0.3309 526.443 57.64278 0.109495 2 174.2 310.0935 -135.893 59.55311 3 40 47 0.1451 278.9111 '

5.872197 0.021054 3 40.47 135.9763 -95.5063 67.08121

~~ '

4.3 30.33 0.05722 530.0594 1.735483 0.003274 4.3 30.33 53.62208 -232921 10.11749 5.2 23 21 0.035668 _ 650.7233 0.827854 0.001272 52 2321 33 42524 -102152 3.121928 6.3 23.1 0.02498 .

924.7398 0.577038 _0.000624 6.3 23.1 .

23.40929 -0.30929 .

0.004086 92 20.79 0.01786 1164.054. 0.371309. 0.000319 92 20.79 16.73699 4.053013 0.981474 10J 20 67 0.017056 1211.89 0.352548 0.000291, 10.3 20.67 15.98354 4.6P6458 1.374094 j 12.3 20.75 0 016154 ..

1284.512 .

_0.335196 0.000261 12.3 20.75 _15.13826 5.611742 2.080269 13 2 21.64 0.015742 1374.666 0.340657 0.000248 132 21.64 14.75216 6.887836 3 215954

] 172 21 0.014134 1485.779 0296814 0.0002 172 21 13.24527 7.754727 4.54017 18 16.88 0.01384 1219.653 0.233619 0.000192 18 16.88 12.96976 3.910241 1.178895

_ _19 17.62 0.013428 1312.183 0236601 0.00018 19 17.62 12.58367 5.036335 2.015682 mean 1004.877 2105.89 2.071931 , _

Wtd LSF 937.1213 -

Sum Sqs_ __185.9361 Unwid LS 1016.39 So best fd is 97% ingestion and 3% inhalation of 1.0 micron AMAD Class Y particles Total intake = 934 nCi. of which 906 is ingestion and 28 is inhalation! l ,

Page 6 8/1/97

CT YankscAals Sheet 3 lCT Yankee Woeker_1, Fecal data DzjPI_ Co 60 nC1 ' Mass Dafy excn Class Y Class W f t = 0.05 Class Y unweis Class W unwes !ng inweis 5.9 .

1.79 128 _46 1.77E42 120E-02 122E-02 3.17E-02 3.13E-04 2.14E-02 1.44E-04 2.19E-02 1.50E-04 9.9 0.105 114.51 1.07E-03 1.67E-03 421E44 1.12E 04 1.14E-06 1.75E-04 2.79E-06 4.42E-05 1.77E-07 12.9 0.0158 103.98 5.92E-04 1.34 E-03 2.39E-04 9.35E-06 3.50E-07 2.12E-05 1.20E-06 3.78E-06 5.71E-08 Sums 1.9108 1.94E-02 1.50E-02 129E-02 3.18E-02 315E-04 2.16E-02 1.48E-04 2.19E-02 1.50E-04 Class Y Point _ estwnate. Class W Point est ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred Ing_

_ 101J299 .

149.4157 146.3614 5.9 1.79E+00 1.75E+00 1.53E+00 1.81E+ 00 98.13084 6" 37425 .

249.4062 9.9 1.05E-01 1.06E-01 2.13E-01 624E-02

_26 68919 . _

11.79104 66.10879 12.9 1.58E-02 5.84E-02 1.71 E-01 3.54E-02 point est 75,316_66 74 69366 153.9588 Wtd LSF 98 68815 127.4716 14823b9 Urmtd I S 101.0382 146.1175 146.4527 Day .,

Actual Pred-Y wid sq Day Actual Pred-W wed sq Day A:tual Pred-Ing .wid sq 5.9 1.79E+00 1.75E+00 0.001069 5.9 1.79E+00 1.53E+00 0.045256 5.9 1.79E+00 1.81E+00_ 0.000279

_ 99, 1_05E-01 ,1.06E-01 3.37E 06 9.9 ;1.05E-01 2.13E-01 0.054668 9.9 1.05E-01 624E-02 0.029097

_ 12.9 1.58E-02 5.84E-02 0.031096 12.9 1.58E-02 1.71E-01 0.140673 12.9 1.58E-02 3.54E-02 0.010868 sumsg 3 22E-02 sumsq 2.41E-01 4.02E-02 ih

~

Assume same as WBC data = 91% ing + 9% Class Y and fit intake

~ ~

Dry] 'nCi IRF Point est -

_ 5.9 .

1.79 .

1.27E-02 ,

141E+02 228E-02 1.62E-04 D_ay nCi Pred wid sq _

9.9 0.105 4.79E-04 2.19E+ 02 5.03E-05 2.30E-07 5.9 1.79 1.804 0.000115 12.9 00158 2.71E-04 5.84E+ 01 4.28E-06 7.33E-06 9.9 0.105 0.068 0.02014 sum ,] il5168 ,

135E-02 2.28E-02 1.62E-04 115 0.015il 0.038 0.013304 Mean 139.3564 WidLs 141.8299 sumsq 3.36E-02 UnwtdLS 140.7716 Page 1 8/1/97

.. . .. _ . - . . . . . m_ . _. .. . _ . . . . ._. ..-

..CT YankeeA.ds Sheet 3 l- 1 I I I I I Assume same as WBC data = 91% ing + 9% Ciess Y 21ota: intake of 418 nCi 4

l Day .

nCi IRF Point est 5.9 1.79 1.27E-02 1.41E+02 2.28E-02 1.62E-04 Day nCi Pred wed sq  !

i 9.9 0.105 4.79E-04 2.19E+02 5.03E-05 2.30E-07 5.9 1.79 5.318 2.340431.

0.0158 12.9 2.71E-04 5.84E+01 428E-06 7.33E-08 9.9 0.105 0200 0.04541 t sum 1.9108 1.35E-02 228E-02 1.62E-04 12.9 0.0158 0.113 0.083788 4

Mean 139.3564 i WidLs 141.8299 sumsq 2.47E+00 UnwedLS 140.7716 J

l I

i i

i i

1 l

-l  ;

4 i

)

4 i

i Page 2 8/1/97 i

. , . , ~ -. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _d

. *[

CT YankeeAAs " Sheet 3  !

I 1 1 CT Yankee Worker 1 Fecal data

~ ~

l l (Am-243)

Gay Pt Am-241 nCi Class Y Class W ft = 5e-4 Class Y unwes Class W unwes ing unwes  ;

5.9 . 6.32E-03f 1.85E-02 1.83E-02 127E 02 1.17E-04 3.42E-04 1.16E44 3.35E44 8.03E-05 1.61E-04  ;

9.9 4 42E-04 1.05E-03 2.15E-03 2.35E-04 4.64E-07 1.10E-06 9.50E-07 4.62E-06 1.04E-07 5.52E-08 12.9 5 55E-05 5.54E-04 120E-05 120E-05 3.07E-08 3.07E-07 6.66E-10 1.44E-10 6.66E-10 1.44E-10 .

Sums 6 82E-03 2.01 E-02 2.05E-02 129E-02 1.17E-04 3.44E-04 1.17E-04 3.40E-04 8.04E-05 1.61E44  !

\

Class Y Point estimate Class W Point est ingest Point est O_ay Actual Pred-Y Pred.W Pred-Ing_ '

3 42E-01 ; 3.45E-01 4.98E-01 5.9 6.32E-03 629E-03 6.09E43 6.69E-03 4 21E-01 2.06E-01 1.88E+00 9.9 4.42E-04 3.57E-04 7.16E44 124E-04 '

1.00E-01 4.63E+ 00 4.63E+00 12.9 5 55E-05 1.88E-04 4.00E-06 6.32E-06 point est 2.88E-01 1.73E+00 2.33E+ 00 Wid LSF 3.39E-01 3.33E-01 5.27E-01  !

Unwtd LS 3.42E-01 3.43E-01 4.98E-01 Day Actual Pred-Y wed sq Day Actual Pred-W wed sq Day Actual Pred-Ing wed sq

_5.9 6.32E-03 6_29E-03 1.43E-07 5.9 6.32E-03 6.09E-03 8.39E-06 5.9 6.32E-03 6.69E-03 2.08E-05 i 9.9 4.42E-04 3.57E-04 2.02E-05 9.9 4.42E-04 7.16E-04 1.05E44 9.9 4.42E-04 1.24E44 8.17E-04 t

12.9 5 55E-05 1.88E-04 9.37E-05 12.9 5.55E-05 4.00E-06 6.64E-04 12.9 5.55E-05 6.32E-06 3.82E-04 i sumsq __ 1.14E-04 7.77E-04 122E-03 l

Assume same as WBC data = 91% ing + 9% Class Y I

Dry .

nCi IRF Point est  !

5.9 6.32E.03 1.32E-02 4.78E-01 8.36E-05 1.75E-04 Day nCi Pred sumsq j 99 4.42E-04 3.08E-04 1.43E+00 1.36E-07 9.51 E-08 5.9 6.32E-03 6.63E-03 1.47E-05  !

12.9 5.55E-05 6.08E-05 9.13E-01 3.37E-09 3.69E-09 9.9 4.42E-04 1.55E-04 0.000534  ;

sum 6 82E 03 1.36E-02 8.37E-05 1.75E-04 12.9 5.55E-05 3.05E-05 2.05E-05 j Mean 9.42E-01 i WidLs 5.02E-01 5.69E-04  !

UnwidLS 4.79E-01 i

Pa9e 3 8/1/97  !

CT YankeeA. mis Sheet 3 -

1 I I I l CT Yankee Worker 1 Fecal data-alirect His for other TRU Day Pt ..Pu238 Class Y Class W f t = 0.05 Class Y unwes Class W unwes ing unwes 59 7.15E-03 1.86E42 1.83E-02 1.30E-02 1.33E-04 3.46E-04 1.31 E-04 3.35E-04 9.30E-05 1.69E-04 99 4.68E-04 1.05E-03 2.17E-03 2.43E-04 4.91E-07 1.10E-06 1.02E-06 4.71 E-06 1.14E-07 5.90E-08 12 9 7.09E-05 5.56E-04 i.74 E-03 1.22E45 3.94E-08 3.09E-07 123E-07 3.03E-06 8.65E-10 1.49E-10 Soms 7.69E-03 2.02E-02 2.22E-02 1.33E-02 1.34E-04 3.47E-04 1.32E-04 3.43E-04 9.31 E-05 1.69E-04 Class Y Point estmate Class W Point est ingest o oint est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred Q

~~

3 84E-01 3.91E-01 5.50E-01 5.9 7.15E-03 7.07E-03 6.33E-03 7.54E-03 4.46E-01 2.16E-01 1.93E+00 9.9 4.68E-04 3.99E-04 7.51E-04 1.41 E-04 1.28E-01 4.07E-02 5.81 E+ 00 12.9 7.09E-05 2.11 E-04 6.02E-04 7.08E-06 4

point est 3.19E-01 2.16E-01 2.76E+00 Wtd LSF 3.81E-01 3.46E-01 5.80E-01 Unwtd LS 3.84 E-01 3.85E-01 5.50E-01 Day Actual Pred-Y wtd sq Day Actual Pred-W wid sq Day Actual Pred-Ing wtd sq_  ;

5.9 7.15E-03 7.07E-03 9.51 E-07 5.9 7.15E-03 6.33E-03 0.000106 5.9 7.15E-03 7.54E-03 2.02E-05 9.9 4.68E-04 3.99E-04 1.19E-05 9.9 4.68E-04 7.51E-04 1.07E-04 9.9 4.68E-04 1.41E-04 7.59E-04 12.9 7.09E-05 2.11 E-04 9.33E-05 12.9 7.09E-05 6.02E-04 4.69E-04 12.9 7.09E-05 7.08E-06 5.76E-04 sumsq 1.06E-04 6.81E-04 1.35E-03 P

i t

l

. Page 4 8/1/97

.CT YankeeA. mis Sheet 3 Day Pi Pu239,240 Class Y Class W f t = 0.05 Class Y unwes Class \*!*swves ing unwes 5.9 3.30E-03 1.86E-02 1.83E-02 1.30E-02 6.14E-05 3.46E-04 6.04E-05 3.35E-04 429E-05 1.69E-04 99 1.7_DE-04 1.05E-03 2.17E-03 2.43E-04 1.79E-07 1.10E-06 3.69E-07 4.71 E-06 4.13E-08 5.90E-08 12.9 0 00E+00 5.56E-04 1.74E-03 1.22E-05 0.GOE+00 3.09E-07 0.00E+00 3.03E-06 0.00E+00 1.49E-10 Sums 3.4 7E-03 2.02E-02 222E-02 1.33E-02 6.16E-05 3.47E-04 6.08E-05 3.43E-04 42]E-05 1.69E n4 Class Y Point es6 mate Class W Point est Ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred-Ing 1.77E-01 1.80E-01 2.54E-01 5.9 3.30E-03 320E-03 2.85E-03 3.41E-03 I f2E-01 7.83E-02 7.00E-01 9.9 1.70E-04 1.81 E-04 3.39E-04 6.37E-05 0 00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 12.9 0.00E+00 9.56E-05 2.71E-04 320E-06 point est 1.13E-01 8.62E-02 3.18E-01 Wtd LSF 1.72E-01 1.56E-01 2.62E-01 i

Unwid LS 1.77E-01 1.77E-01 2.54E-01 Ogy Actual Pred-Y wed sq Day Actual Pred-W wtd sq Day Actual Pred-Ing wtd sq _

5.9 3.30E-03 320E-03 3.18E-06 5.9 3.30E-03 2.85E-03 6.94E-05 5.9 3.30E-03 3.41E-03 3.3E-06 9.9 1.70E-04 1.81 E-04 622E-07 9.9 1.70E-04 3.39E-04 8.39E-05 9.9 1.70E-04 6.37E-05 1.78E-04 12.9 0.00E+ 00 9.56E-05 9.56E-05 12.9 0.00E+00 2.71 E-04 2.71 E-04 12.9 0.00E+00 320E-06 320E-06 sumsq 9 94E-05 425E-04 1.84E-04

^

l Page5 8/1/97

..' . *l CT YankeeA mis Sheet 3 i

l I l l l .)

CT Yankee Worker 1 Fecal data-drect sis for cGwr TRU l i

l (Cm-242)

Cm-244 Claes Y ClassW f1 = SE-4 Claes Y unwes Class W unwes ing unwes l Day Pi 5.9 323E-03 0.00E+00 1.49E-02 127E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.82E-05 223E44 4.10E-05 1.61E44 I 9.9 3.99E44 0.00E+00 2. 65E-03 2.35E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.06E-06 7.01E46 9.38E-08 5.52E-08 12.9 8.90E-05 0.00E+00 2.24E-03 1. ;8E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.00E-07 5.04E-06 1.05E-09 1.39E-10 Soms 3.72E-03 0.00E* 00 1.98E-02 129E-02 0.00E+09 0.00E+00 4.94E-05 2.35E-04 4.11E-05 1.61E44 Class W Point est ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred-Ing C_tase Y Point estimate 2.17E-01 2.54E41 5.9 323E-03 0.00E+00 2.80E-03 3.64E-03 1.51E-01 1.70E+00 9.9 3.99E-04 0.00E+00 4.98E-04 6.74E-05 3.97E-02 7.54E+00 12.9 8.90E 05 0.00E+00 4.22E-04 3.39E-06 point est _ 1.36E-01 3.16E+00 Wtd LSF 1.88E-01 2.87E-01 2.11E-01 2.55E-01 U5d LSF _

Day Actual Pred-W wed sq Day Actual Pred-Ing wed sq Day Act- J

- Pred-Y 5.9 323E-03 2.80E-03 6.46E-05 5.9 323E-03 3.64E-03 4.72E-05 5.9, 323E-03 3.00E+00 9.9 3 99E-04 0.00E+00 9.9 3.99E-04 4.98E-04 1.95E-05 9.9 3.99E44 6.74E-05 1.63E-03 12.9 8.90E-05 422E44 2.63E-04 12.9 8M-05 3.39E-06 216E-03 12.9 8 90E-05 0 00E+00 sa.;r.q 3.47E-04 3.84E-03 e

Page 6 811/9 7

o ,o; CT YankeeA xis Sheet 4 l

CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecal data D ay_P L Co-60 rc Mass Dady excn Class Y Class W f1 = 0.05 Class Y unwes Class W unwes bg unwes 6.1 0.825 163.09 1.52E-02 1.05E-02 1.01E-02 1.25E-02 2 31E-04 8.66E-03 1.10E-04 8.33E-03 1.02E-04

__10.1 -

0 31.82 9.92E-04 1.61 E-03 3.87E-04 0.00E+00 9.83E-07 0.00E+00 2 59E-06 0.00E+00 1.50E-07 13.1 0 70.86 5.71E-04 1.33E-03 2.31 E-04 0.00E+ 00 3.25E-07 0.00E+00 1.76E-06 0.00E+00 5.34E-08 Sums 0.825 1.68E-02 1.34 E-02 1.07E-02 125E-02 2.32E-04 8 66E-03 1.15E-04 8.33E-03 1.02E-04 Class Y Point estimate Class W Point est ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred ing_

~

54.28- 78.57 41.68 6.1 0.825 0.748 0.645 0.777 0 00 0.00 0.00 10.1 0 0.049 0.099 0.030 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 0 0 028 0.081 0.018 point est 18.09 26 19 27.23 Wtd LSF_ 4922 61.41 76.97 tin ~wtd LS 53.97 75.59 81.52 Day Actual Pred-Y wtd sq Day Actual Pred-W wid sq Day Actual Pred-Ing wtd sq 5a, 0825 7.48E-01 0.0079 5.9 0.825 6.45E-01 0.050378 5.9 0.825 7.77E-01 0.002911 99 0 4.88E-02 0.0488 9.9 0 9.89E-02 0 098865 9_9 0 2.98E-02 0.029789 12.9 0 2.81 E-02 0.028079 12.9 0 8.14 E-02 0.081364 12 9 0 1.78E-02 0.017781 sumsg , 8.48E-02 sumsq 2.31 E-01 5.05E.02 l

Page 1 8/1/97

CT YankeeA mis Sheet 4 i

Day PI Am-241 rCi Class Y Class W f t = 0.05 Class Y unwWs Class W unwes ing unwes 6.1 3.21 E-03 1.60E-02 1.60E-02 1.04E-02 5.14 E-05 2 56E-04 5.14E-05 2.56E-04 334E-05 1.08E-04 10.1 4.71 E-05 9.66E-04 2.06E-03 7.67E-05 4.55E-08 9.33E-07 9.70E-08 424E-06 3 E1E-09 5.88E-09 13.1 4.38E-05 5.325-04 1.69E-03 1.04E-13 233E-08 2.83E-07 7 40E-08 2_86E-06 4.56E-18 1.08E-26 Sums 3.30E-03 1.75E-02 1.9EE-02 1.05E 02 5.14E-05 2.57E-04 5.15E-05 2.63E-04 334E-05 1.08E-04 ,

Class Y ' Point estwnate Class W Point est ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred ing_

2.01 E-01 2.01 E-01 3.09E-01 6.1 321E-03 7.84E-04 3 66E-04 6.39E-03 4.8SE 02 2.29E-02 6.14 E-01 10.1 4.71 E-05 4.73E-05 4.72E-05 4.71 E-05 8.23E-02 2.59E-02 421E+08 13.1 4.38E-05 2.61E-05 3.87E-05 6.39E-14 I

point est 1.11 E-01 8.31 E-02 1.40E+08 Wtd LSF 1.89E-01 1.67E-01 3.15E-01 Unwtd LS 2.00E-Ol 1.96E-01 3.09E-01 Day Actual Pred-Y wid sq Day Actual Pred-W wtd sq Day Actual Pred-Ing wtd sq 5.9 321E-03 3.02E-03 122E-05 5.9 321E-03 2.67E-03 0.000107 5.9 321E-03 328E-03 1.36E-06 9.9 4.71 E-05 1.82E-04 0.0001 9.9 4.71 E-05 3.44E-04 0.000257 9.9 4.71 E-05 2.42E-05 2.18E-05 12.9 4.38E-05 1.00E-04 3.19E-05 12.9 4.38E-05 2.82E-04 0.000202 12.9 438E-05 328E-14 5854732 sumsq 1.44E-04 sumsg 5.66E-04 5.85E404 Page 2 8/1/97

CT YankeeAAs Sheet 4

.f 1 I I I i ,

CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecal data-drect fits for oeier TRU ,

Day Pt Class Y Class W f t = 0.05 Cla-s Y unwes Class W umw8s ing unwes

'Pu238_ .

6.1 1.67E-03 1.60E-02 1.60E-02 1.07E-02 23 ' J-05 2.56E-04 2.67E-05 2.56E-04 1.79E-05 1.14E-04 i 1'03 0 00E+00 9.68E44 2.08E-03 1.99E-04 0.00E+00 9.37E-07 0.00E+00 4.33E-06 0.00E+00 3.96E46 III ' 8 63E-05 5.34E-04 1.71E-03 1.00E-05 4.61E-08 2.85E-07 1.48E-07 2.92E-06 8.63E-10 1.00E-10 l Sums 1.76E-03 1.75E-02 1.98E42 1.09E-02 2.68E-05 2.57E-04 2.69E-05 2.63E-04 1.79E-05 1.15E-04 Class Y Point estmate Class W Point est ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred M _  ;

T075E-01 1.04E-01 1.56E-01 6.1 1.67E-03 1.60E-03 1.42E-03 1.72E-03 l

0.00E+ 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 10.1 0.00E+00 9.68E-05 1.85E-04 3.20E-05 1.62E-01 5.05E-02 8.63E+00 13.1 8.63E-05 5.34E-05 1.52E-04 1.61 E-06

\

point est 8 87E-02 5.16E-02 2.93E+00 ,

Wid LSF 1.00E-01 8 87E-02 1.61 E-01 Unwtd LS 1.04E-01 1.02E-01 1.56E-01 i Day Actual Pred-Y wed sq Day Actual Pred-W . wed sq_ Day Actual Preding wtd sq l 5.9 1.67E-03 1.61 E-03 2.58E-06 5.9 1.67E-03 1.42E-03 4.4E-05 5.9 1.67E43 1.72C43 1.61 E-06

• 9.9 0 00E+00 9.71E-05 9.71E-05 9.9 0.00E+00 1.85E-04 0.000185 9.9 0.00E+00 320E-05 32E-05 12.9 _8 63E-05 5.365-05 2E-05 12_9 8.63E-05 1.52E-04 2.82E-05 t?.9 8.63E-05 1.61E-06 0.004455 sumsq 120E-04 sumsg 2.57E-04 4.49E-03 r

i i

I 1

1  ;

Page 3 8/1/97

CT YankeeAA. Shee!4 DyP1 Pu239,240 Class Y Class W f1 = 0.05 Class Y unwes Class W umes ing unwes 6.1 4.85E-04 1.60E-02 1.60E-02 1.07E-02 7.76E-06 2.56E-04 7.76E-06 2.56E-04 5.19E-06 1.14E-04 10.1 4 00E45 9.68E-04 2.08E-03 1.99E44 3.87E n8 9.37E47 8.32E-08 4.33E-06 7.96E-09 3.96E-08 13.1 123E 05 5.34E-04 1.71 E-03 1.00E-05 6.57E-09 2.85E-07 2.10E-08 2.92E-06 1.23E-10 1.00E-10 Soms. 5.37E-04 1.75E-02 1.98E-02 1.09E-02 7.81 E-06 2.57E-04 7.86E-06 2.63E-04 520E-06 1.15E-04 y Ciass Y' Point estwnate Class W Pcint est inged Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W PredIng_

3.03E-02 3.03E-02 4.53E-02 6.1 4.85E-04 4.91E-04 4.35E-04 528E-04 4j3E-02 1.92E-02, .

2.0

• E-01 10.1 4.00E45 2.97E45 5.66E-05 9.81E-06 2.30E-02 7.19E43 12',E+00

. 13.1 123E-05 1.64E-05 4.65E-05 4.93E-07

] point est 3.16E-02 1.89E-02 4.92E-01 Wtd LSF 3.07E-02 2.72E-02 4.93E-02 Unwid LS 3.03E-02 2.99E-02 4.54E-02 Day Actual Pred-Y wed sq Day Actual Pred-W wed sq Day Actuel Pred-Ing wid sq 5.9 4.85E-04 4.91E-04 7.8E-08 5.9 4.35E-04 4.34E-04 5.89E46 _

5.9 4.35E-04 5.27E-04 3.35E-06 4 99 4.00E-05 2.97E-05 3.56E-06 9.9 4.00E-05 5.65E-05 4.8E-06 9.9 4.00E-05 9.80E-06 9.3E-05

_12j 123E-05 1.64E-05 1.02E-06 12 9 123E-05 4.64E-05 2.51 E-05 12.9 123E-05 4.93E-07 0.000283 sumsq 4.66E-06 sumsq 3.58E-05 3.79E-04 i

1 4

4 Page 4 8/119 7

CT YankeeAAs Sheel4 I I I I i _

CT Yankee Werker 2 Fecal data-drect ses for oewr TRU (Cm-242)

Day P1 - Cm-244 Class Y Class W f t = 5E-4 Class Y unwes Class W unwes Ing unwes

~

6.1 1.98E-03 0.00E+00 1.51E-02 1.04E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.99E rSH 228E-04 2.08E-05 1.00E-04 10.1 0.00E+00 ' +:.uoE+00 1.89E 1.93E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+LO 3.57E-06 0.00E+00 3.72E-08 1 33 1.46E-05 0.00E+00 1.52E-03 9.65E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 221E-08 2.30E-06 1.41E-10 9.31E-11 Sums 1.99E-03 0.00E+ 00 1.85E-02 1.06E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.99E-05 2.34E-04 2.06E-05 1.08E-C4 Class Y Point eshmate Class W Point est ingest Point est Gay Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred-Ing 1.31 E-01 1.90E-01 6.1 1.98E-03 0.00E+00 1.63E-03 1.96E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 10.1 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.04E-04 3.63E-05 9 64E-03 1.51E+00 13.1 1.46E-05 0.00E+00 1.64E-04 1.81E-06 point est 4.69E-02 5.68E-01 Wid LSF 1.00E-01 1.88E-01 Unwid LSF 128E-01 1.90E-01 Day Actual Pred-Y wed sq Day Actual Pred-W wtd sq Day Actust Pred-Ing wtd sq 5.9 1.98E-03 0.00E+00 5.9 1.98E-33 1.63E-03 7.62E-05 5.9 1.9eE-03 1.96E-03 2.83E-07 9.9 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.9 O!"1E+00 2.04E-C4 0.000204 9.9 0.00E+00 3.63E-05 3.63E-05 12.9 1.46E-05 0.00E+00 12.9 1.,6E-05 1.63E-04 0.000135 12.9 1.46E-05 1.82E-06 9E-05 sumoq sumsq 4.15E-04 127E-04 Page5 8/1/97

CT YankeeA. mis . Sheet 4 I I I i i I CT Yankee worker 2: TRU data scaled by fecal mass to 135 gfd (ICRP 23):

D3y Pi Am-241 n_ Mass Daily even Class Y Class W f t = 0.05 Cla_ss Y tswvtis Class W unwes ing tsmwtis

[

6.1 321E-03 163.09 321E-03 1.60E-02 1.60E-02 1.04E-02 5.14E-05 2.56E-04 5.14E-05 2.56E-04 3.34E-05 108E-04 10.1

~

4.71 E-05 31.82 2.00E-04 9.66E-04 2.06E.03 7.67E 05 1.93E-07 9.33E-07 4.12E-07 424E-06 1.53E-08 5.88E-09 13 1 4.38E-05 70.86 8.34E-05 5.32E-04 1.69E-03 1.04 E-13 4.44E-08 2.83E-07 1.41 E-07 2.86E-06 8.68E-18 1.08E-26 l _

Soms 3,30E-03 3.49E-03 1.75E-02 1.98E-02 1.05E-02 5.16E-05 2.57E-04 5.19E-05 2.63E-04 3.34E-05 1.08E-04 Class Y Point estimate Class W ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W I Point est_ __ Pred Q 2.01 E-01 2.01 E-01 3.09E-01 6.1 321E-03 3.31E-03 1.55E-03 2.71 E-02 [

2.07E-01 9.70E-02 2.61 E+ 00 10.1 2.005-04 2.00E-04 2.00E-04 2.00E-04 i T57ET~ OI 4.94E-02 8.02E+08 13.1 8.34E-05 ' 1.10E-04 1.64E-04 2.71E-13 point est 1.88E-01 1.16E-01 2.67E+08 Wtd LSF 2.00E-01 1.77E-01 3.33E-01 ,

Unwtd LS 2.01 E-01 1.97E-01 3.09E-01 _

i Dry Actual Pred-Y wid sq Day Actual Pred-W wtd sq Day Actual Pred-Ing _ wed sq 5.9 321E-03 3.19E-03

~

7.8E-08 5.9 321E-03 2.83E-03 5.1 E-05 59 321E-03 3.47E-03 1.92E-05  !

95 ' 2.00E-04 1.93E204 2.52E-07 9.9 2.00E-04 3.64E-04 7.43E-05' 9.9 2.00E-04 2.56E-05 0.00118f 12.9 8.34 E-05 1.06E-04 4.88E-06 12.9 8.34E-05 2.99E-04 0.000155 12.9 8.34E-05 3.47E-14 200803.9 sumsq 521E-06 sumsg 2.81 E-04 2.01E+05 -

I i

i F

i i

i l Page 6 8/1/97 [

CT YankeeA.xts Sheet 4 l 1 1 I l CT Yankee Worket 2 Fecal data-direct fits for other TRU Day Pi Pu238 Mass DW even Class Y Class W f t = 0.05 Class Y unwt!s Class W unwes ing trwves 6.1 1.67E-03 163.09 1.67E-03 1.60E-02 1.60E-02 1.07E-02 2.67E-05 2.56E-04 2.67E-05 2.56E-04 1.79E-05 1.14E-04 10 1 0.00E+ 00 31.82 0.00E+00 9.68E-04 2.08E-03 1.99E-04 0.00E+00 9.37E-07 0.00E+00 4.33E-06 0.00E+ 00 3.96E-08 13.1 8 63E-05 70.86 1.64E-04 5.34 E-04 1.71 E-03 1.00E-05 8.78E-08 2.85E-07 2.81E-07 2.92E-06 1.64 E-09 1.00E-10 Soms 1.76E-03 1.83E-03 1.75E-02 1.98E-02 1.09E-02 2.68E-05 2.57E-04 2.70E-05 2.63E-04 1.79E-05 1.15E-04 Pred-W

~

C! ass Y Point estimate Class W Point est Ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-Ing_

1.04E-01 1.04 E-01 1.56E-01 6.1 1.67E43 1.68E-03 1.48E-03 1.80E-03 0.00E +00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 10.1 0.00E+00 1.02E44 1.93E-04 3.34E-05 3.08E-01 9.61E-02 1.64E+ 01 13.1 1.64E-04 5.61 E-05 1.59E-04 1.68E-06 point est 1.37E-01 6.68E-02 E.53E+00 Wtd LSF 1.0$E-01 9.27E-02 1.68E-01 Unwid LS 1.04 E-01 1.03E-01 1.56E-01 Diy' Actual Pred-Y wid sq Day Actual Pred-W wt7.1 Day Actual Pred-Ing _ wid sq 59 1.67E-03 1.68E-03 2.91E-08 5.9 1.67E-03 1.48d-03 2.36E-05 5.9 1.67E-03 1.80E-03 929E-06 9.9 0.00.E *00 1.01 E-04 0.000101 9.9 0.00E+ 00 1.93E-04 0.000193 9.9 0.00E+00 3.35E-05 3.35E-05 0.015749 12.9 1.64 E-04 5.60E-05 0 00021 12.9 1.64 E-04 1.59c-04 22E-07 12.9 1.64E-04 1.68E-06 sumsq 3.12E-04 sumsg 2.17E-04 1.58E-02 Page 7 8/1/97

. CT YankeeA. mis Sheet 4 4-CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecal data-direct tes for oewr TRU l ,

(

Day PI Pu239,24 Maes Deer escn Class Y Class W f1 = 0.b..- Class Y unwes Class W unwes ingunwes i 6.1 4 85E44 163.09 4.85E44 1.60E-02 1.60E-02 1.07E42 7.76E-06 2.56E-04 7.76E-06 2.56E44 5.19E-06 1.14E44 I j 10.1 4.00E-05 31.82 1.70E44 9.68E44 2.08E-03 1.99E-04 1.64E-07 9.3T-07 3.53E47 4.33E-06 3.38E-08 3.96E-08  !

13.1 1.23E-05 70.86 2.34E-05 5.34E44 1.71E-03 1.00E-05 125E-08 2 85E-07 4.01E-08 2.92E-06 2.34E-10 1.00E-10 +

r I Sums 5.37E44 6.78E-04 1.75E-02 1.98E-02 1.09E-02 7.94E-06 2.57E-04 8.15E-06 2.63E-04 522E-06 1.15!:-04  !

j Class Y - Point estmate ._

Class W Poirt est ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred-Ing i 3.03E-02 3 03E-02 4.53E-02 6.1 4.85E44 6.19E-04 5.49E-04 6.66E-04 I 1.75E-01 8.16E-02 8.53E-01 10.1 1.70E-04 3.75E-05 7.13E-05 124E-05 j 4.39E-02 1.37E-02 2.34E+00 13.1 2.34E-04 2.07E-05 5.87E-05 6.22E-07 L i i

)'

point est 8.32E42.. 4.19E-02 1.06E+00  ;

Wtd LSF 3.87E-02 3.43E42 6.22E-02 Unwid LS 3.09E-02 3.10E-02 4.56E-02  !

i r

Day Actual Pred-Y wed sq- Day- Actual Fred-W wed sq Day Actual Pred-Ing wed sq 5.9 4.85E.04 620E-04 2.94E-05 5.9 4.85E-04 5.48E-04 7.3E-06 5.9 4.85E-04 6.65E-04 4.88E-05 t l' 9.9 1.70E-04 3.75E-05 0.000466 9.9 1.70E-04 7.13E-05 0.000136 9.9 1.70E-04 124E-05 0.002001 j 12.9 2.34E45 2.07E-05 3.64E47 12.9 2.34E-05 5.86E-05 2.11E-05 12.9 2_34E-05 622E-07 0.000637  !

- 4.96e m - i .64e-04 2.89e43  !

f r

I i

1 i e

r 4

f 2

i

! l 3  !

Page 8 8/1/97 i

$ f

~

.. ,.I CT YankeeA mis ' Sheet 4

~

(Cm-242)

Day PI Mass Desyencn Class Y Class W f1 = SE-4 Class Y unwes Class W umves ing unuses

' 'Cm-2_44 6.1 1.902-03 163.09 1.98E-03 0.00E+00 1.51E-J2 1.04E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+ 00 2.99E-05 2.28E-04 2.06E-05 1.00E-04 10.1 0.00E +00 31.82 0.00E+00 0 00E+00 1.89E-03 1.93E-04 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.57E-06 0.00E+00 3.72E-08 13.1 1.46E-05 70.86 2.72E-05 0.00E+00 1.52E-03 9 65E-06 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+00 421E-08 2.30E-06 2.68E-10 9.31E-11 SAT - 1.99E-03 2.01E .03 0 00E+00 1.85E-02 1.06E-02 0 00E+00 0 00E+00 3.00E-05 2.34E-04 2.06E-05 1.08E-04 Class Y Point estwnate Point est ingest Point est Day Actual Pred-Y Pred-W Pred Q

_. Class W 1.31 E-01 1.90E-01 6.1 1.98E-03 0 00E >00 1.63E-03 1.97E-03

~

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 10.1 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.04E-04 3.65E-05

[, 1.84E-02 i 2.88E+00 13.1 2.78E-05 0.00E+00 1.64E-04 ? .82E-06 point _est _ 4.98E-02 1.02E+00 Wtd LSF 1.08E-01 1.89E-01 1.18E-01 1.90E-01 Unw]td LSF '

l Dry Actual Pred-Y wed sq Day Actual Pred-W wid sq Day Actuel Pred-Ing wed sq 5.9 1.98E-03 1.64E-03 7.11 E-05 5.9 1.90E-03 1.97E-03 5.66E-08

~

^

5.9 1.98E-03 0.00E+00 95 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.9 0.00E+00 2.05E-04 O_000205 9.9 0.00E+00 3.65E-05 3.65E-05

~751 2T78E-05 0.00E+00 12.9 2.78E-05 1.64E 84 0.000113 12.9 2.78E-05 1.83E-06 0.00037 sumsq sumsq 3.89E-04 4.06E-04 s

Page 9 8/1/97

-s

CT Yank:eA.xis Sheet $

Checking activity ratios in fecal sampics:

Worker 1 Activity Activity relative to Co-60 Mean Day _5.9 Day 6.9 Day 12.9 Day 5.9 Day 6.9 Day 12.9 Mean air / debris Co-60 1.79E+00 1.05E 01 1.58E 02 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+ 00 100E+00 U,233.234 9.40E 04 7.57E 04 6.29E 04 5.25E 04 7.21E 03 3.9BE 02 3.87E 03 U-235 9.18E 05 0.00E+00 1.55E 05 5.13E 05 0 00E+00 9.81E 04 0.56E 05 U 238 6.83E 04 5.54E-04 5.44E 04 3.82E 04 5.28E 03 3.44E 02 2.83E-03 Pu 238 7.15E 03 4.68E-04 7.09E 05 3.99E O' 4.46E 03 4.49E 03 4.23E 03 1.57E 03 Pu 239.240 3.30E 03 1.70E 04 0.00E+00 1.84E u 1.62E 03 0.00E+00 1.73E 03 6.40E 04 Am 241 6.32E 03 4.42E 04 5.55E 05 3.53E-03 4.21E 03 3.51E 03 3.87E 03 2.21E 03 Cm 244 3.23E 03 3.99E.94 8.90E 05 1.80E 03 3.80E 03 5.63E 03 2.80E 03 1.19E 03 Activity relative to Am 241 Day 5.9 Day 6.9 Day 12.9 Mean 2.83E+02 2.38E+ 02 2.85E+02 2.60E+02 U234/238 1.38E+00 1.37E+00 1.16E+00 1.49E 01 1.71 E+00 1.13E+01 9.31E 01 U235/238 1.34E-01 0.00E+ 00 2.S$E 02 1.45E 02 0.00E+00 2.79E 01 7.26E 03 U234/235 1.02E+01 4.06E+01 1.08E 01 1.2SE+00 9.80E+00 6.81E G1 1.13E+ 00 1.06E+00 1.28E+00 1.10E+00 Tctal U 1.71E 03 1.31 E-03 1.19E 03 5.22E 01 3.85E 01 0.00E+00 4.53E 01 _

typical Lkgd fecal excn 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 5.11E 01 9.03E 01 1.60E+ 00 7.07E 01 Worker 2 dctivity relative to Co-60 Mean Day 6.1 Day 10.1 Day 13.1 Day 6.1 Day 10.1 Day 13.1 Mean alr/ debris Co-60 8.25E 01 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 U 233.234 8.93E 04 1.78E 04 4.00E 04 1.08E 03 1.08E 03 U 235 5.40E 05 0.00E+00 2.78E 05 6.55E-05 6.55E 05 U 238 5.80E 04 2.20E 04 3.09E 04 7.03E 04 7.03E 04 Pu-238 1.67E 03 0.00E+00 8.63E 05 2.02E 03 2.02E 03 1.57E 05 Pu 239.240 4.85E 04 4.00E 05 1.23E 05 5.88E 04 5.88E 04 6.40E 04 Am 241 3.21E 03 4.70E 05 4.38E 05 ~

3.89E 03 3.89E 03 2.21E 03 Cm 244 1.98E 03 0.00E+00 1.46E 05 2.40E 03 2.40E 03 1.19E 03 Activity relative to Am-241 Day 6.1 Day 10.1 Day 13.1 Mean 2.57E+02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.29E+02 U234/238 1.54E+00 8.09E 01 1.29E+00 2.78E 01 3.79E+00 9.13E+00 2.03E+00 U235/238 9.31E-02 0.00E+00 9.00E 02 1.68E 02 0.00E+00 6.35E-01 8.41E 03 U234/235 1.65E+ 01 1.44E+01 1.81 E-01 4.68E+00 7.05E+00 2.43E+00 5.20E 01 0.00E+00 1.97E+ s0 2.60E 01 Total U 1.53E 03 3.98E 04 7.37E 04 1.51E 01 8.51E 01 2.81E 01 5.01E 01 typical bk0d fecal excn 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 6.17E 01 0.00E+00 3.33E 01 3.08E 01 Page1 12/24/97

CT YankeeA.xis Sheet $

Activity rat 6os in air and smear samples Relative to Co.60 i

FTC air RC air FTC air Debris Dehes Debris Debris Debris 110201 110203 110212 2C 5A 50 8B 8D Mean Co40 1.00E+00 1.00E400 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 U-233,234 1.07E 06 3.11E 07 6.91E 07 U 235 U 238 Pu 238 1.66E 03 2.10E-03 2.55E 04 1.33E 03 2.19E-03 2.35E 03 1.64E 03 1.06E 03 1.57E 03 Pi. 239,240 6.92E 04 8.47E 04 5.99E 05 3.54E 04 9.31E 04 8.65E 04 8.62E 04 5.06E 04 6.40E-04 A.re 241 2.77E 03 3.25E-03 4.87E 04 1.61E 03 2.37E 03 3.15E 03 2.84E 03 1.21E 03 2.21E 03 C m 244 1.52E 03 1.76E 03 2.02E 04 9.63E 04 1.33E 03 1.94E 03 1.29E 03 5.30E-04 1.19E 03 i

Relative to Am 241 FTC air RC air FTC air Debris Debris Debris Debns Debns 110201 110203 110212 2C 5A SD 88 80 Mean Co-60 3.61 E+02 3.08E+02 2.05E+03 6.21E+02 4.22E+02 3.17E+02 3.52E+02 8.26E+02 6.58E+ 02 Uo233,234 3.40E 04 2.57E 04 2.98E 04 U 235 U 238

, Pu 238 5.99E 01 6.46E 01 5.24E 01 8.26E 01 9.24E 01 7.46E 01 5.77E 01 8.76E 01 7.15E 01 Pu 239,240 2.50E 01 2.61E 01 1.23E-01 2.20E-01 3.93E 01 2.75E 01 3.04E 01 4.20E 01 2.81E 01

. Am 241 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 l Cm 244 5.49E 01 5.42E 01 4.15E 01 5.98E 01 5.61E 01 6.16E 01 4.54E 01 4.38E 01 5.22E 01 4

't Page 2 12/24/97

CT YankeeA.wls Sheet 6 i Dose Calculabons l l l l l l Ce 60_ based on_WBC data for both inhalaton and ingeshon, Class Y,1 micron AMAD TR,U antakes based on actmty ratio in air /debns data

-~

@/orker 1:

Nuchde ,

Class ,Ingeshon intake CEDE . CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS inhalaton intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS r Ci Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv!Bq Sv CA60 Y 3.80E+ 02 1.41 E+04 2.77E-09 3.89E-05 9.39E-10' 1.32E-05 3.76E+ 01 1.39E+03 5.91E-08 822E-05 1.35E-08 1.8SEE U-233.234 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 '

U-235 d'0UE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 ~

i

~

Ug38] I) 00E+00 0 00E+00 0.00E+ 00 Pu 238__ ..W 6.00E-01 2.22E + 01 8 65E-07 1.92E-05 1.58E-05 3.51E-04 6.00E-02 222E+00 %.06E-04 2.35E-04 1.90E-03 422E-03 i Pu-239,40 W

~

2.40E-01 8.88E+ 00 9.56E-07 8.49E-06 1.76E-05 1.56E-04 2.40E-02 8.88E-01 1.16E-04 1.03E-04 2.11E-03 1.87E-03 i Arn-2i1~ 15 8.40E-01 3.11E+ 01 9.84E-07 3.06E-05 1.81E-05 5.63E-04 8.40E-02 3.11 E+00 1.20E-04 3.73E-04 2.17E-03 6.74E-03 Crn-244_ . W_ 4.50E-01 1.67E+ 01 5.45E-07 9.07E-06 9.77E-06 _1.63E-04 4.50E-02 167E+00 6 70E-05 1.12E-04 1.17E-03 1.95E-03 i

~'

sum 1.06E-04 125E-03 sum 9.05E-04 1.48E-02 Total 1.01E-03 1.60E-02 rem 0.10 1.60 Worker 2-Nuc6de-~ Class ingeshon htake CEDE CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS inhalaten intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS nCi Bq Sv!Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi Bq Sv!Bq Sv Sv!Bq Sv Co-60 Y 9.06E+02 3.35E+04 2.77E-09 929E-05 9.3CE-10 3.15E-05 2.80E+01 1.04E+03 5 91E-08 6.12E-05 1.35E-08 1.40E-05 U-233.234 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+ 00 ,

U-235 T00E+00 'O.00E+00 0.00E+00 U-238_ 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Pu-238_ W 1.42E+00 5.25E+01 8.65E-07 4.54 E-05 1.58E-05 8.30E-04 4.40E-02 1.63E+00 1.06E-04 1.73E-04 1.90E-03 3.09E-03 Pu-239,40 W ., 5.80E-01 2.15E+01 9.56E-07 2.05E-05 1.76E-05 3.78E-04 1.80E-02 6.66E-01 1.16E-04 7.73E-05 2.11E-03 1.41E-03 Amg41_ W 2.00E+00 7.40E+ 01 9.84E-07 728E-05 1.81E-05 1.34E-03 620E-02 229E+00 1.20E-04 2.75E_-04 2.17E-03 4.98E-03 Cm-244 W_ 1.08E+00 4.00E + 01 5.45E-07 2.18E45 9.77E-06 3.90E-04 3.00E-02 1.11E+00 6.70E-05 7.44E-05 1.17E-03 1.30E-03  !

~~

sum 2.53E-04 2.97E-03 sum 6.61E-04 1.0SE-02 Total 9.14E-04 1.38E-02 rem 0.09 1.38 l

Page 1 8/5/97 l'

.___.._____.__________)

CT Yanks:A.=fs Shect6  ;

l l

l l l I l l l_ _

l Cd60 base <8 on WBC data for both inhalation and ingestion, Class Y,1 micron AMAD  ;

~

TRU inhalatis n intakes based on fit to fecal data, no mass sca:ing l l - l TQingestiast is.iakes based on At to fecal data reated by ratio for ingestion 6nhalation for Cg60 T

d/oriter 1:

N5hdE

~

Class ingestion iniake CEDE CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS ' Inhalation intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS' nCi Bq Sv/aq Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi BJ. Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sy CA60 Y 3.80E +02 1.41 E +04 2.77E-09 3.89E-05 9.39E-10' 132E-05 3.76E

• 01 1.39E+03 5 91E 08 822E-05 1.35E-08 ' 1.88E-05 U-233,234 0.00E + 00 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+00 0-235 0.00E+ 00 0.00E + 00 0 00E+00

( U-238 0.00E + 00 0 OGE+00 0.00E+ 00 Pu-238 Y 3.84E+00 1.4r+ 02 1.34 E-08 1.90E-06 1.58E-07 224E-P5 3.80E-01 1.41E+01 7.79E-05 1.10E-03 725E-04 1.02E-02 Pu-239,40 Y 1.72E+ 00 6.36L 401 1.40E-08 8.91 E-07 1.76E-07 1.12E-05 1.72E-01 6.36E+00 8.33E-05 5.30E-04 8.21E-04 522E-03 Am-241 Y 3.44E+ 00 1.27E+02 9.84E-07 125E-04 1.81E-05 2.30E-03 3.40E-01 126E+01 120E-04 1.51 E-03 2.17E-03J.73E-02 Cm-244 W 1.90E+00 7.03E + 01 5.45E-07 3.83E-05 9.77E-06 6.87E-04 1.88E-01 6.96E+ 00 6.70E-05 4.66E-04 1.17E-03 8.14E-03

~ ~

~~

sum 2.0 5 -04 3.04 E-03 sum 3.68E-03 5.09E-02 Total 3.89E-03 5.39E-02 rem 0.39 5.39 Woeter 2:

Nuclide Class , Ingestion intake CEDE L CEDE CDE BS CDE-BS inhalation intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS nCi Sq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi _ BJ SvlBq_ Sv Sv/Bq Sv Co.60 Y 9.06E + 02 3.35E+04 2.77E-09 929E-05 9.39E-10 3.15E.05 2.80ti+ 01 1.04E + 03 5.91 E-08 6.12E-05 1.35E-08 1.40E-05 U-233,234 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 U-235 0.00E+ 00 0.00E go 0.00E+00

'U-238 0.00E+00 0 OSE60 0.00E+00 Pu-238 W 3.23E+ 00 L ME+02 8.65E-07 1.03E-04 1.58E-05 1.89E-03 1.00E-01 3.70E+ 00 1.06E-04 3.92E-04 1.90E-03 7.03E-03 Pu-239,40 W 1.00E+00 3.70E+01 9.56E-07 3.54E-05 1.76E-05 6.51E-04 3.10E-02 1.15E+ 00 1.16E-04 1.33E-04 2.11 E-03 2.42E-03 Am-241

~

Y 6.11 E+ 00 226E+02 9.84E-07 2.22504 1.81 E-05 4.09E-03 1.89t:-01 6.99E+ 00 120E-04 8.39E-04 2.17E-03 1.52E-02 Crh n U~W 319E+ 00 129E+02 5.45E-07 7.04E-05 9.77E-06 1.2CE-03 1.08E 01 4.00E400 6.7CE-05 2.68E-04 1.17E-03 4.68E-03 wm 5.24E-04 7.92E-03 sum 1.69E-03 2.93E-02 i

Total 222E-0_3 3.72E-02 rem 022 3.72 Page 2 8/5/97

CT YankeeA.xis Sheet 3

_ __ l _

Dose Calculations Co-60 based on WBC data for both inhalation and ingestion, Class i T RU inhalation intakes based on fit to fecal data, worker 2 feces scaled by mass _

l TRU_ ingestion intakes based on fit to fecal data scaled by ratio for ingestion / inhalation for CoJO Worker 1:

Nuclide Class CEDE CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS Inhalation intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CL J-BS ingestion intake nCi Sv/Bq Sv S.v/Bg_ Sv nCi 89 Sv/Dq Sv Sv/Bq Sv Bq_ .

~

9.39E-10 1.32E-05 3.76E+01 1.39E + 03 5.91 E-08 822E-05 1.35E-08 1.88E-05 Cold- l7 3.80E+02 1.41 E + 04 2.77E-09 3.89E-05 0.00E+00 U-233.234 0.00E + 00 0.00E+00 U-235 0 00E+00 0.00E + 00 0.00E+ 00 U-238 0 00E+00 0.00E + 00 0.00E+ 0C Pu 238 Y 3 84E+00 1.42E+ 02 1.34 E-08 1.90E-06 1.58E-07 2.2SE-05 3.80E-01 1.41E+01 7.79E-05 1.10E-03 7.25E-04 1.02E-02 Pu 239.40 Y 1.74E + 00 6.43E+ 01 1.40E-08 9.01E-07 1.76E-07 1.13E-05 1.72E 01 6.36E+ 00 8.33E-05 5.30E-04 821E-04 5.22E-03 Am-241 Y 3 44E+00 1.27E+02 9.84 E-07 125E-04 1.81 E-05 2.30E-03 3.40E-01 126E+01 1.20E-04 1.51 E-03 2.17E-03 2.73E-02 Cm-244 W 1.90E+00 7.03E+ 01 5.45E-07 3.83E-05 9.77E-06 6.87E-04 1.88E-01 6.96E+ 00 6.70E-05 4.66E-04 1.17E-03 8.14 E-03

~

sum 2.05E-04 3.04503 U 3.68E-03 5.09E-02 Total 3.89E-03 .

5.39E-02 f rem 0.39 5.39 Worker 2:

CEDE CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS inhalation intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS Nuclide Class Ingestion intake nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq__ Sv nCi Bg Sv/Bq Sv Sv/8g __ Sv Co 60 Y '9 06E+02 3.35E+ 04 2.77E-09 9 29E-05 ' 9.39E-10~ 3.15E-05 2.80E+01 1.04E+ 03 5.91E-08 ' 6.12E-05 1.35E-OP 1.40E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+ 00 U-233.234 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+ 00 U 235 -

550E+00 0.00E + 00 0.00E+ 00

U 238 -

8.65E-07 9.63E-05 1.58E-05 1.76E-03 9.30E-02 3.44 E+ 00 1.06E-04' 3.65E-04 1.90E-03 6.54 E-03 Pu 2W~ W 3.01 E + 00' 1.11E+02 1.10E+00 4 07E+01 9.56E-07 2.89E-05 1.76E-05 7.16E-04 3.40E-02 126E+00 1.16E-04 1.46E-04 2.11 E-03 2.65E-03 i

Pu-239.4 0 W 6.47E +00 2.39E+02 9.84E-07 2.35E-04 1.81 E-05 4.33E-03 2.00E-01 7.40E+ 00 1.20E-04 8.88E-04 2.17E-03 1.61 E-02 Am-241 Y 3.49E + 00 1.29E+02 5.45E-07 7.04 E- 05 9.77E-06 1.26E-03 1.08E-01 4.00E+ 00 6.70E-05 2.68E-04 1.17E-03 4.68E-03 Cm-244 W

- - - ~ -

sum 5.34 E-04 8.10E-03 sum 1.73 E-03 2.99E-02 Total 2.26E-03 3.80E-02 rem 0 23 3 30 l

Page 3 8/5/97 l

. . . . . . ~ . . . . -. . . . _

CT YankuA mis .. Sheet 6 l -

l VVorker 1 Co-60 from WBC, TRU from fecal ratios to Co-oO 3

I NucMe Ratio in ingestion intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS InhalalK - ~@e. 'DCF CEDE CDE-BS .CDE-BS feces nCi Sv/B3 Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv l

, B_3 ._

mean Co-60 'iIddE+00 3.80E + 02 1.41 E +04 2.77E-09 3.89E-05 9.39E-10 1.32E-05 3.76E+ 01 1.39E+ 03 5.91E-08 822E-05 1.35E-08 1.35E-08 U-233,234 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 U-235 0.00E + 0 ', 0.00E+00 U 238 0.00E+00 0.00E+ 00 Pu-238 4 23E-03 f.61E+00 5.95E+01 8.65E-07 5.14E-05 1.58E-05 3.40E-04 1.59E-01 5.88E+00 1.06E-04 624E-04 190E-03 1.12E- 02 Pu-239,4 0 1.73E-03 6.57E-01 2.43E+01 9.56E-07 2.33E-05 1.76E-05. 428E-04 6.50E-02 2.41E+00 1.16E-04 2.79E-04 2.11E-03 5.08E-03 Amy1] }87E-03l 1A7E+00 5.44E+01 9.84E-07 5.35E-05 1.81E-05 9.85E34 _

1.43r-01 5.38E+00 120E-04 6.46E-04 2.17E-03 1.17E-02 cm-244 2.80E-03 1.06E' 00 3.94E+01 5.45E-07 2.15E-05 9.77E-06 ,3 85F 3 1.05E-01 3.90E+ 00 6.70E-05 2.61E-04 1.17E-03 4.56E-03 sum 1.89E-04 2.75E-03 sum 1.89E-03 325E-02 Total 2.08E-03 3.53E-02 rem 021 ~

3.53 VVorher 2: Co-60 from WBC, TRU from fecal ratios to Co-60 I

Nuclide Ratio in ingestion intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS Inhalation intake - DCF CEDE .CDE-BS CDE-BS feces on nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi B_g Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv day 6.1 Co 60 3.35E+04 2.77E-09 929E-05 9.39E-t o 3.15E-05 2.80E401 1.04 E+03 5.91 E-08 6.17E-05 _1.35E-08 1.40E-05

~ 1.00E+ 00~9.06E + 02 U-233.234 0.00E+00 ~

0.00E+00 U-235 0.00E+00 0.00E400 U-230 0.00E+00 0.00E+ 00 Pu-238 2.02E-03 1.83E+00 6.77E+01 8.65E-07 5.86E-05 1.58E-05 1.07E-03 5.66E-02 2.09E+00 1.06E-04 2.22E-04 1.90E-03 3.98E-03

, Pu-23970388E-04 5.33E-0i 1.97E + 01 9.56E-07 1.88E-05 1.76E-05 3.47E-04 1.65E-02 6.09E-01 1.16E-04 7.07E-05 2.11E-03 129E-03 Am-241 3.89E-03 3.52E+ 00 1.30E+02 9.84E-07 1.28E-04 1.81 E-05 2.36E-03 1.09E-01 4.03E+00 120E-04 4 84E-04 2.17E-03 8.76E-03 Cm-244 2.40E-03 2.17E+ 00 8.05E + 01 5.45E-07 4.38E-05 9.77E-06 7.86E-04 6.72E-02 2.49E400 6.70E-05 1.67E-04 1.17E-03 2.91 E-03 sum 3.42E-04 4.59E-03 sem 1.00E-03 ' 1.69E-02 Total 1.35E-03 2.15E-02 rem 0.13 2.15 Page 4 8/5/97

~

-~

CT Yanks:A.xfs Sheet 6 l

Worker 1: Co-60 ing/wt from WBC, Am-241 inh from fecal. Am-241 ing from Co-60 inhrng ratio, TRU from fecal ratios to Am-211 1 I I Nuclide Ratio in Ingestion intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS Inhalation intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS feces nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv mean Co 60 2.60E+02 ?.A0E+02 1.41 E+ 04 2.77E-09 3.89E-05 9.39E-10 1.32E-05 3.76E+01 1.39E+03 5 90E-08 8.21 E-05 1.35E-08 1.88E-05 U 233,234 "

0.00E+00 0.00E+ 00 U- 35~ 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 U 7238 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+ 00 Pu-238 1.10E+ 00 3.78E + 00 1.40E+02 8.65E-07 1.21 E-04 1.58E-06 2.21 E-04 3.74E-01 1.38E+ 01 7.80E-05 1.08E-03 7.25E-04 1.00E-02 Pu-239,4 0 4.53E-01 1.56E + 00 5.76E+01 9.56E-07 5.51 E-05 1.76E-06 1.01 E-04 1.54E-01 5.70E+00 8.30E-05 4.73E-04 8.21 E-04 4.68E-03 Am-241 ~

1.00E+ 00 3.44 E+ 00 1.27E+02 9.84E-07 1.25E-04 1.81 E-05 2.30E-03 '

3.40E-01 1.26E+01 1 '0E-04 1.51 E-03 2.17E-03 2.73E-02 Cr'n-544 7.07E-Oi 2.43E + 00 8.99E+ 01 5.455-57 4.90E-05 9.77E-06 8.79E-04 216E-01 8.89E+ 00 ~t. *0E-05 5.96E-04' 1.17E-03 1.04E-02 sum 3.89E-04 3.52E-03 _

sum 3.74E-03 5.24 E-02 Total 4.13E-03 5.60E-02 rem 0.41 5 60 Worker 2: Co-60 ing/ inh from WBC, Am-241 (Y) inh from unscaled fecal, Am-241__ing from Co-60 inh /ing ratio, TRU from fecal ratios to Am-241 DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS inhalatica intake DCF CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS Nuclide . Ratio in Ingestion intake feces on nCi Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi Bq Sv/Bq_ Sv Sv/Bq Sv

.B3 day 6.1 Co-60 2.57E

• 02 9 06E+02 3.35E+ 04 2.77E-09 9.29E-05 9.39E-10 3.15E-05 2.80E+ 01 1.04 E+03 5.90E-08 6.11 E-05 1.35E-08 1.40E-05 U-233,234 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Ug35 0.00E+ 0c 0.00E+00 U 238 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+00 Puli38 5.20E-01 3.18E+ 00 1.18E+02 9.10E-08 1.07E-05 1.58E-06 1.86E-04 9.83E-02 3.64E+00 7.80E-05 2.84E-04 7.25E-04 2.64E-03

~

PE 39,40'~i3iE-01 T23E-01 3.41 E* 01 1.00E-07 3.41 E-06 1.76E-06 6.01 E-05 2.85E-02 1.06E+ 00 ,8.30E-05 8.76E-05 8.21 E-04 8.67E-04 Am-241 1.00E+00 ti.11 E + 00 2.26E+ 02 9.80E-07 2.22E-04 1.81 E-05 4.09E-03 1.89E-01 6.99E+ 00 1.20E-04 8.39E-04 2.17E-03 1.52E-02 Cm 244 6.1/E-01 3.77E + 00 1.39E+ 02 5.50E-07 7.67E-05 9.77E-06 1.36E-03 1.17E-01 4.31 E+ 00 6.70E-05 2.89E-04 1.17E-03 5.05E-03 2.37E-02

~

sum 4.05E-04 ' 5.73E-03 sum 1.56E-03 Total 1.97E-03 2.95E-02

- - ~ ~ ~

rem 0.20 2.95 Page5 8/5/97 i

L_____

. . *l CT Yank::eA xts Shect6 l l l l l l l ~ ~ '

Dose Calculations from best estimates of intakes; at TRU assumed to be Class W  !

Co 60 based on WBC data for both inhalation and ingestion, Class Y l TRU inha@ tion intakes based on fit to fecal data, worker 2 feces scaled by mass _

TRU ingestion intakes based on fit to fecal data scaled by ratio for ingestionfusalation for Co-60 _ _

Worker 1:

Nuchdi Class ingestion intake CEDE CEDE ' CDE-BS CDE-BS Inha!aFon intake . 'DCF CEDE CDE-BS ' CDE-BS nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq_ Sv nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv Co-60 Y 3.80E+02 1.41 E + 04 2.77E-09 3.89E-05 9.39E-10 1.32E-05 3.76E401 1.39E+ 03 5.91E-08 822E-05 1.35E-08 1.88E-05 U 233.234 0.00E + 00 0.00E + 00 0.00E+00 U-235 0.00E + 00 0.00E + 00 0.00E+00 U 238 0.00E + 00 0.00E + 00 0.00E+ 00 Pu-238 W 3.50E + 00 1.29E+02 8.67E-07 1.12E-04 1.58E-05 2.0$E-03 3.46E-01 1.28E+ 01 1.06E-04 1.36E-03 1.90E-03 2.43E-02 Pu-239,40 W 1.58E+00 5.84E+01 9.56E-07 5.58E-05 1.76E-05 1.03E-03 1.56E-01 SyE+00 1.16E-04 6.70E-04 2.11 E-03 1.22E-02 Am-241 W 3.37E + 06 1.25E+ 02 9.84E-07 1.23E-04 1.81 E-05 2.25E-03 3.33E-01 1.23E+01 120E-04 1.48E-03 2.17E-03 2.67E-02 Cmg44 . W 1.90E+00 7.03E + 01 5.45E-07 3.83E-05 9.77E-06 6.87E-04 1.88E-01 6.96E+ 00 6.70E-05 4.66E-04 1.17E-03 8.14 E-03

'-~

~-

sum 3.68E-04 '-6.C3E-03 sum 4.05E-03 7.14E42 Total 4.42E-03 7.74 E-02 tem 0.44 7.74 Worker 2: I Nuclide Class Ingestion intake CEDE CEDE CDE-BS CDE-BS Inhalation intake - DCF CEDE .CDE-BS CDE-BS nCi Bq Sv/Bq_ Sv Sv/Bq Sv nCi .Bq Sv/Bq_ Sv Sv,8q _ Sv C560 Y 9.06E+ 02 3.35E+ 04 7 77E-09 929E-05 9.39E-10 3.15E-05 2.30E + 01 1.04 E+ 03 5.91 E-08 S.12E-05 1.35E-08 1.40E-05 U 233.234 0.00E + 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+ 00 U-235 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+ 00 0.00E+00 U-238 0.00E + 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Pu 238 W 3.00E+ 00 1.11 E+ 02 8.67E-07 9.62E-05 1.58E-05 1.75E-03 9.27E-02 3.43E+00 1.06E-04 3.64E-04 1.90E-03 6.52E-03 Pu-239,40 W 1.11E+00 4.10E+ 01 9.56E-07 3.92E-05 1.76E-05 7.22E-04 3.43E-02 1.27E+00 1.16E-04 1.47E-04 2.11 E-03 2.68E-03 Am-241 W 5.72E + 00 2.12E + 02 9.P 4E-07 2.08E-04 1.81 E-05 3.83E-03 1.77E-01 6.55E+00 120E-04 7.86E-04 2.17E-03 1.42E-02 Cni-244~ W 3.495I66 1.29E+02 5.45E77 7.04 E-05 9.77E-06 126E-03 38E-01' 4.00E + 00 6.70E-05 2.68E-04' 1.17E-03 4.68E-03

' ~ -

sum 5.07E-04 7.60E-03 sum 1.63E-03 2.81 E-02 Tota! 2.13E-03 3.57E-02

~ ~ -

rem 0.21 3.57 Page 6 8/5/97

. ?: .,y Sheel7 Connecticut Yankee Wbrker 1 WBC-WB RFs from CNDY Day _Pt nCi RFs: 1muY Point est it = 0.05 Point est 1 mu Class Y unweis Ing unwes 0.061 1411.1 0.63 652.5397 1 -411.1 258.993 0.3969 411.1 1 0.91 343.3 0.59 581.G644 0.761 451.117 '202.547 0.3481 261.2513 0.579121 2 106.3 -0.42 253.0952 0.34 312.6471 44.646.._ 0.17G4 36.142 0.1156 3 51.28 0.3 170.9333 0.148 34 '95 15.384 0.09 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.21 117.0952 0.0557 _4 2 5.1639 0.0441 1.369663 0.003102 5.2 18.42 0.19 96.94737 0.034 541.su47 3.4998 0.0361 0.62628 0.001158 6.3 16.94 0.17 99.64706 1 0.023 736.5217 2.8798 0.0289 0.3 811 ?? 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.16 104.5625 0.016 1045.625 2.6768 0.0256 026768 0.000256 1,0 12.74 0.16 79.625 - 0.015 8493333 - 2.0384 0.0256 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.17 6929412 0.013 906.1538 2.0026 - 0 0289 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 3 2.4057 539.8313 12006 719.0802 1.722062 point est 222.5dO4 604 2221 Wid LSF 337.7267 421.1581 _

Unwid LS 449.6346 417.5692 Day Actual Pred-1 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual F8- deference wid square 0.061 411.1 212.751 421.16 0.061 411.1 212.7678 198.3322 -184.876 0;91 3433 199243 320.5028 0.91 343.3 199.2587 144.0413 104.1254 2 106.3 141.834 143.1944 2 106.3 141.8452 -35.5452 8.907325 3 51.28 101.31 62.33168 3 5128 101318 -50.038 24.71231 4.3 24.59 70.917 23.45861 4.3 '24.59 70.9226 -46.3326 30.26835 5.2 18.42 ._ 64.163 14.31944 5.2 18.42 64.16807 -45.7481 32.61569 6.3 16.94 57.409 9.68668 6.3 16.94 57.41353 -40.4735 28.53172 9.1 16.73 54.032 6.73856 9.1 16.73 54.03627 -37.3063 25.75599 10 12.74 54.032 63174 10 12.74 54.03627 -41 2963 31.55995 13 11.78 57A09 5.47508 13' 11.78 57.41353 --45.6335 36 27053 Sum,Sgs 507.6232 _ _ _ .

-we- 68 9M. A e N- >N- 6 em W h @

Page 1

.. ,.l Sheet 7 8

Worker 1 CINDY 5 mu Class Y Day Pi _. nCi IRFs: 5 mu Y Point est f1 = 0.05 Point est _ 5 mu Class Y unwtis Ing unwtis 0.06_1 411.1 0.91 451.7582 1 411.1 374.1C1 0.8281 411.1 1 0 91 343.3 0.82 418.6585 0.761 451.117 281.506 0.6724 2612513 0.579121

___ _ 2 106.3 0.5 212.6 0.34 312.6471 53.15 025 36.142 0.1156

_3 51.28 0.28 183.1429 0.148 346.4865 14.3584 0 0784 7.58944 0.021004 4.3 24.59 0.14 175.6429 0.0557 441.4722 3.4426 0.0196 1.369663 0.003102 52 18.42 0.1 1842 0.034 541.7647 1.842 0.01 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16.94 0.082 206.5854 0.023 736.5217 1.38908 0.006724 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.069 242.4638 0.016 1045.625. 1.15437 0.004761 0 26768 0.000256 __

10 12.74 0.068 187.3529 0715 849.3333 0.86632 0.004624 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.065 181.2308 0.013 906.1538 0.7657 0.004225 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 3.034 2.4057 732.5755 1.878834 719.0802 1.722062 point est 244.3635 604 2221 Wid LSF 333.942 421.1581 Unwid LS 389.909_6 417.5692 Day _

Actual Pred-5 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fit difference wid square 0.061 411.1 303.8854 333 0.061 411.1 303.8872 1072128 37.82516 0.91 313.3 273.8308 253.413 0.91 343.3 273.8324 69.46757 17.62298 2 106.3 166.97 113.22 2 106.3 166.971 -60.671 22.04556 3 51.28 93.5032 49.284 3 51.28 93.50376 -422238 19.0671 4.3 24.59 _ 46.7516 18.5481 4.3 24.59 46.75188 -22.1619 10.50544 5.2 18.42 33.394 11.322 52 18.42 33.3942 -14.9742 6.714539 6.3 16.94 ,27.38308 7.659 6.3 16.94 27.38324 -10.4432 3.982776 9.1 16.73 23.04186 5.328 9.1 16.73 23.042 -6.312 1.729074 10 12.74 22 70792 4.995 10 12.74 22.70806 -9.96806 4.375634 13 11.78 21.7061 4.329 13 11.78 21.70623 -9.92623 4.539251 Sum Sqs _128.4075 Page 2

\ ,__ __

. ,a Sheel7 Worker 1 CINDY 10 mu Class Y _

DayPI nCi IRF's: 10 mu Y Point est f1 = 0.05 Point est 10 mu Class Y unwits ing unwits 0.061 411.1 1 411.1 1 411.1 411.1 1- 411.1 1 0.91 343.3 0.9 381.4444 0.761 451.117 308 97 0.81 261.2513 0.579121 2 106.3 0.54 196.8519 0.34 312.6471 57.402 0.2916 36.142 0.1156 i 3 51.28 0.28 183.1429 0.148 346.4865 14.3584 0.0784 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.13 189.1538 0.0557 441.4722 3.1967 0.0169 1.369663 0.003102 5.2 18.42 0.084 219.2857 0.034 541.7647 1.54728 0.007056 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16 94 0.062 273.2258 0.023 736.5217 1.05028 0.003844 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.049 341.4286 0.016 1045.625 0.81977 0.002401 026768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.047 271.0638 0.015 849.3333 0.59878 0.002209 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.045 261.7778 0.013 906.1538 0.5301 0.002025 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 3.137 2.4057 799.5733 2.214435 719.0802 1.722062 point est 272.847_5 604.2221 Wtd LSF 322.9774 421.1581 Urwvtd LS 361.0733 417.5692 Day Actual Pred-10 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fit difference wid square l 0.061 411.1 322.97 333 0.061 411.1 322.9774 88.12263 24.04379 0 91 343.3 290.673 253.413 0.91 343.3 290.e796 52.62037 9.525619 2 106.3 174.4038 113.22 2 106.3 174.4078 -68.1978 26.59669 3 51.28 90.4316 49.284 3 51.28 90.43366 -39.1537 16.95176 4.3 24.59 41.9861 18.5481 4.3 24.59 41.98706 -17.3971 7.208355 5.2 18.42 27.12948 11.322 52 18.42 27.1301 -8.7101 2.796371 6.3 16.94 20.02414 7.659 6.3 16.94 20.0246 -3.0846 0.475152 9.1 16.73 15.82553 5.328 9.1 16.73 15.82589 0.904109 0.05165 10 12.74 15.17959 4.995 10 12.74 15.17994 -2.43994 0.392181 13 11.78 14.53365 4.329 13 11.78 14.53398 -2.75398 0.52184 Sum Sqs 88.5634

-e.

Page 3

Sheel7 -

Worker 1 CINDY 8 mu Class Y Day PI nCi IRF's: 8 mu Y Point est it = 0.05 Point est 8 mu Class Y unwtis ing unwes 0.061 411.1 0.98 419.4898 1 411.1 402.878 -0.9604 411.1 1 0.91 343.3 0 88 390.1136 0.761 451.117 302.104 0.7744 2612513 0.579121

-2 106.3 _

0.53 200.566 0.34 312.6471 56.339 0.2809 36.142 0.1156 3 51.28 028 183.1429 0.148 346.4865 14.3584 00784 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.13 189.1538 0.0557 441.4722 3.1967 0.0169 1.369663 0.003102 5.2 18.42 0.089 206.966_3 0.034 541.7647 1.63938 0.007921 0.62628 0.0011:56 6.3 16.94 0.067 252.8358 0.023 736.5217 1.13498 0.004489 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.054 309.8148 0.016 1045.625 0.90342 0.002916 0 26768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.053 240.3774 0.015 849.3333 0 67522 0.00?809 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 .

0.05 235.ti 0.013 906.1538 0.589 0.00![ 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 3.113 2.4057 783.8181 2.131635 719.0802 1.722062 point est 262.806 604 2221 Wtd LSF 325.4674 421.1581 Unwid LS 367.7075 417.5692 Day Actual Pred-8 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fit difference wed square 0.061 411.1 318.99 333 0.061 411.1 318.958 92.14195 26.61836 0.91 '43.3

, 286.44 253.413 0.91 343.3 286.4113 56.88869 11.29957 2 106.3 172.515 113.22 2 106.3 172.4977 -66.1977 25.40403

_3 5128 91.14 49.284 3 51.28 91.13087 -39.8509 17.4265 43 24.59 42.315 18.5481 4.3 24.59 42.31076 -17.7208 7.42188 5.2 18.42 28.9695 11.322 52 18.42 28.966g -10.5466 3.839965 6.3 .

16.94 21.8085 7.659 6.3 16.94 21.80632 -4.86632 1.085971 9.1 16.73 17.577 5.328 9.1 16.73 17.57524 -0.84524 _0.04065 10 12.74 17.2515 4.995 10 12.74 1724977 -4.50977 1.179033 13 11.78 16275 4.329 13 11.78 16.27337 -4.49337 12407 Sum Sqs 95.55665 Page 4

.+ ,.

t' Sheet 7 -

l Worker 1 CINDY 20 mu Class Y Day Pt nCi IRF's: 20 mu Y Point est ~ f1 = 0.05 .- Point est 20 mu Class Y unweis ing unwes 0 061 411.1 -0.99 415.2525 1 411.1 406.989 0.9801 411.1 1 0.91 343.3 0.9 381.4444 0.761 451.117 308.97 0.81 261 2513 0.579121 2 106.3 0.53 200.566 0.34 312.6471 56.339 -02809 36.142 0.1156 ,

3 51.28 026 197.2308 0.148 346.4865 13.3328 0.0676 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.11 223.5455 :0.0557 441.4722 -2.7049 0.0121 1.369863 0.003102 5.2 18.42 0.063 292.381 ' O.034 541.7647 -1.16046 0.003969 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16.94 0.041 413.1707 0.023 736.5217 'O.69454 0.001681 0.38962 0.000529 95 16.73 0.028 597.5 0.016 1045.625 0.46844 0.000784 026768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.027 471.8519 0.015 849.3333 -0.34398 0.000729 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.024 490.8333 0.013 906.1538 -0.28272 0.000576 0.15314 0.000169 Sum - 1013.18 2.973 2.4057 _

791.2858 2.158439 719.0002 1.722062

~

point est 368.3776 604.2221 _

WId LSF 340.7938 421.1581 Unwid LS 366.601 417.5692 Day Actual Pred-20 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fit diNerence wed square 0.061 411.1 337.392 333 0.061 411.1 337.3859 73.71413 16.10551 0.91 343.3 306.72 253.413 0.91 343.3 306.7144 36.58557 4.384007 _

2 106.3 180.624 113.22 2 106.3 180.6?O7 -74.3207 30.58104 3 5128 88.608 49284 3 51.28 88.60639 -37.3264 15.72414 4.3 24.59 37.488 18.5481 4.3 24.59 37.48732 -12.8973 4.437256 5.2 18.42 21.4704 11.322 52 18.42 21.47001 -3.05001 0.433282 6.3 16.94 13.9728 7.659 6.3 16.94 13.97255 2.967454 0.63022 9.1 16.73 9.5424 5.328 9.1 16.73 9.542227 7.187773 5.414259 10 12.74 -9.2016 4.995 10 12.74 9201433 3.538567 1.360816 13 11.78 8.1792 4.329 13 11.78 8.179051 3.600949 1.585371 Sum Sqs 80.63591 Page5

, g.

" Sheet 7-Worker 1 CNDY 15 mu Class Y Day Pi - nCi IRFs: 15 mu Y- Point est fl = 0.05 . Post est - 15 mu Class Y unwtts ing unwes 0,061 411.1 1 - 411.1 1 411.1 411.1 1 . 411.1 1 0.91 343.3 0.9 381.4444 0.761 451.117 308.97 0.81 26125'3 0.579121 2 106.3 0.53 200.566 - 0.34 3*2.6471 56.339 02809 '36.112 0.1156 3 51.28 0.27 189.9259 0.148 346.4865 13.8456 -0.0729 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.11 223.5455 0.0557 441.4722 2.7049 0.0121 1.369663 0.003102 52 18.42 0.072 255.8333 0.034 541.7647 1.32624 0.005184 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16.94 0.05 338.8 ' 0.023 736.5217 0.847 0.0025 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.037 452.1622 0.016 1045.625 0.61901 0.001369 026768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.036 353.8889 -0.015 849.3333 0.45864 0.001296 01911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.033 356.9697 0.013 906.1538 0.38874 0;001089 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 3.038 2.4057 796.5991 2 37338 719.0802 1.722062 point est 316.4236 604.2221 WId LSF 333 5023 471.158_1 Unwid LS 364.1866 417.5692 Day Actual Pred-15 mu Pred-Ing - Day Actost Fit difference wed square 0.061 _

411.1 333.5 333 - 0.061 411.1 333.5023 77.5977 18.05505 O.91 343.3 300.15 253.413 0.91 343 3 300.1521 43.14793 6202663

_2 106.3 176.755 113.22 '

2 106.3 176.7562 -70.4562 28.08432 3 51.28 _ 90.045 49284 3 5128 90.04562 -38.7656 16.68902 4.3 24.59 36.685 18.5481 4.3 24.59 36.68525 '-12.0953 3.987846 5.2 18.42 24.012 -11.322 5.2 18.42 24.01217 -5.5E217 1.302353 6.3 16.94 16.675 7.659 6.3 16.94 16.67512 0254885 0.004208 9.1 16.73 12.3395 5.328 9.1 16.73 12.33959 4.390415 1.562106 10 12.74 12.006 4.995 10 '12.74 12.00608 0.733917 0.044863 13 11.78 11.0055 4.329 13 11.78 11.00558 0.774424 0.054494 Sum Sqs 75.98694 Page 6

Sheets .* , *!

Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC CINDY _

1.0 mu Class Y Day PI nCi IRF's: 1.0 mu Y Point esti f1 = 0.05 Point est 1.0 mu Y unwits ingestion unwits 0.065 1080 0.63 1714.286 1 1080 680.4 0.3969 - W80 1 0.27 990.5 0.63 1572222 0.986 1004.564 624.015 0.3969 976.633 0.972196 2 174 2 0.42 114.7619 0.34 512.3529 73.164 0.1764 59228 0.1156 3 40.47 0.3 134.9 0.148 273.4459 12.141 0.09 5.98956 0.021904 4.3 30.33 0.2 151.65 0.049 618.9796 6.066 C.04 1.48617 0.002401 5.2 23.21 0.19 122.1579 0.034 682.6471 4.4099 0.0361 0.78914 0.001156 6.3 23 1 0.17 135.8824 0.023 1004.348 3.927 0.0259 0.5313 0.000529 9.2 20.79 '

0.16 129.9375 0.016 1299.375 3.3264 0.0256 0.33264 0.000256 10 5 20.67 O.16 129.1875 0.015 1378 3.3072 0.0256 0.31005 0.000225 15~5 20.75 0.16 129.6875 0.013 1596.154 3.32 0.0256 026975 0.000169 I 13.2 21.64 0.16 13525 0.013 1664.615 3.4624 0.0256 0 28132 0.000169 172 21 0.15 140 0.011 1909.091 3.15 0.0225 0.231 0.000121

- 18 16.88 0.15 112.5333 0.011 1534.545 2.532 0.021: 0.18568 0.000121

_19 17.62 0.15 117.4667 0.011 1601.818 2.643 0.0225 0.19382 0.000121 2501.16 3.63 2.67 -

1425.864 1.3351 2126.461 2.114968 Su_m point est 367.1373 1154.281 Wld LSF 689.0248 936.764 Unwid LS 1067.983 1005.434 53 mu Class Y Day PI nC) Day Actual Fit d#ference wid square 0.065 1080 434.07 0.065 1080 434.085G 345.9144 961.1131 0.1. ' 990.5 434.07 027 6.89821 6.073206 0.825004 0.680632 2 174.2 289.38 2 5.160204 5 667741 -0.50754 0257593 3 40.47 206.7 3 3.700561 5.331268 -1.63071 2.659207 4.3 30.33 137.8 4.3 3.412137 4.925803 -1.51367 2 291185 5.2 23.21 130.91 5.2 3.144583 4.87451 -1.72993 2.992647 6.3 23.1 117.13 6.3 3.139833 4.763284 -1.62345 2.635596 9.2 20.79 110.24 9.2 3.034472 4.70266 -1.66819 2.78285 10.5 20.67 110.24 10.3 3.028683 4.70266 -1.67398 2.802197 12.3 20.75 11024 12.3 3.032546 4.70266 -1.67011 2.789279

~

15'2. 21.64 110.24 '132 3.074 M3 4.70266 -1.62812 2.650763 11 5 21 103.35 172 3.044tU 4.638121 -1.5936 2.539557

- 18 16.88' 103.35 18 2.826129 4.638121 -1.81199 3.283314 19 17.62 103.35 19 2.869035 4.638121 -1.76909 3.129668

~-

Sum Sqs . 992.6076 Page1

Sheet 8 ,. ,

Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC CINDY 5.0 mu Class Y Day Pl nCi 5.0 mu Y Point estimate 5.0 mu Y unwtis

. IRFs:

0 065 1080 0 91 1186.813 982.8 0.8281 0.27 990.5 0.9 1100.556 891.45 0.81 2 17dI2 6.5 348.4 87.1 0.25 3 40 47 0.28 144.5357 11.3316 0.0784 _

4.3 30.33 0.13 233.3077 3.9429 0.0169 5.2 23 21 0.1 232.1 2.321 0 01 _

< 6.') 23.1 0.082 281.7073 _

1.8942 0.006724 9.2 20.79 0.069 301.3043 1.43451 0.004761 10I3 20.67 0.068 303.9706 1.40556 0.004624 ii3 20.75 0.066 314.3939 1.3695 0.004356 13.2 21 64 0.065 332.9231 1.4066 0.004225 17.5 21 0.063 333.3333 1.323 0.003969 18 16 88 0.063 267.9365 1.06344 0.003969 19 17.62 0.063 279.6825 1.11006 0.003969 Sum 2501.56 3.359 1989.952 2.029997 point est 404.3546

~

Wtd LSF 744.6145 Unwid LS 980.2736 5.0 mu Class Y Day PI nCi Day Actual Fd difference wid square 0.065 I t'S' 677.586 0.065 1080 677.5992 402.4008 238.9708 0.27 999.a 670.14 0.27 990.5 670.153 320.347 153.1325 2 174.2 372.3 2 174.2 372.3072 -198.107 105.4142 3 40.47 208.488 3 40.47 208.4921 -168.022 135.4076 4.3 30.33 96.798 4.3 30.33 96.79988 -66.4699 45 64308 74.46145 -51.2514 35.27612

~

5.2 23.21 74.46 5.2 23.21 6.3 23.1 61.0572 6.3 23.1 61.05839 -37.9584 23.59773 9.2 20.79 51.3774 9.2 20.79 61.3784 -30.5884 1P.21096 10.3 20.67 50.6328 10.3 20.67 50.63378 -29.9638 17.7318 12.3 20.75 49.14455 -28.3946 16.4057, ii3 20.75 49.1436 13.2 21.64 48.399 13.2 21.64 48.39994 . -26.7599 14.79536 17.2 21 46.9098 17.2 21 46.91071 -25.9107 14.31155 18 16.88 46 9098 18 16.88 46.91071 -30.0307 19.22468 19 17.62 46.9098 19 17.62 46.91071 -29.2907 18.28891 Sum Sqs 856.411

~ ~ ~ ~

Page 2 t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

Sheet 8 .

Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC C;NDY 10 mu Class Y Diy PI nCi IRF's: 10 mu Y Point estimate 10 mu Y unwils 0.065 1080 1 1080 1080 1 0.27 990.5 1 990.5 990.5 1 2 174.2 0.54 322.5926 94.068 0.2916 3 40.47 0.28 144.5357 11.3316 0.0784 4.3 30.33 0.11 275.7273 3.3363 0.0121 5.2 23.21 0.084 276.3095 1.94964 0 007056 63 23.1 0.062 372.5806 1.4322 0.003844 92 ~ 20.79 0.048 433.125 0.99792 0.002304 10 3 20.67 0.047 439.7872 0.97149 0.002209 12.3 20.75 0.C.6 461.1111' O.93375 0.002025 13.2 21.64 0.045 480.8889 0.9738 0.002025 173 21 0.043 488.3721 0.903 0.001849 _

18 16.88 0.042 401.9048 ').70896 0.001764 _

19 , 17.62 0.042 419.5238 174004 0.001764 bum 2501.16 3.388 t .88.847 2.40694

~

point est 470.497 Wd LSF 738.2409 _

Unwtd LS 909.3898 10 mu Class Y Day PI nCi .

Day Actual FR l difference wid square 0 065 1080 738.2 0.065 1080 7382409 341.7591 158.213 0.27 990.5 738.2 0.27 990.5 7382409 2522591 86.19772 2 174.2 398.628 2 174.2 398.6501 -224.45 126.3711 3 40.47 206.696 3 40.47 206.7074 -166 237 133.6908 4.3 30.33 81.202 4.3 30.33 81.20649 -50.8765 31.87A 51

~~

53 23.21 62.0088 5.2 23.21 62.01223 -38.8022 24.27929 6.3 23.1 45.7684 6.3 23.1 45.77093 -22.6709 11 22921 9.2 20.79 35.4336 9.2 20.79 35.43556 -14.6456 6.053028 10.3 20.67 34.6954 10.3 20.67 34.69732 -14.0273 5.670919 12.3 20.75 33.219 12.3 20.75 33.22084 -12.4708 4.681453 132 21.64 33.219 13.2 21.64 33.22084 -11.5808 4.037099 17.2 21 31.7426 17.2 21 31.74436 -10.7444 3.63659

- ' "18

~

16.88 31.0044 18 16.88 31.00612 -14.1261 6.435735 19 17.62 31.0044 19 17.62 31.00612 -13.3861 5.779121

~~

Sum Sqs 608.1496 ,

Page 3 L_______._.

Sheet 8 ** -

c.*i l

-l Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC CNDY 8 mu Class Y D_ay Pi ,nCi IRF's: 8 mu Y Point estimate - 8 mu Y unwits .

0.065 .1080 0.98 1102.041 1058.4 0.9604

- ')27 990.5 0.98 1010.714 970.69 0.9604 2 174.2 0.53 328.6792 92.326 02809 3 40.47 028 144.5357 11.3316 0.0784 4.3 30.33 0.12 252.75 3.6396 0.0144 52 23.21 0.089 260.7865 . 2.06569 0.007921 6.3 23.1 0.067 344.7761 1.5477 0.004489 92 '

20.79 0.054 385 1.12266 0.002916 10.3 20.67 0.052 397.5 1.07484 0.002704 ~

12.3 20.75 0.051 406.8627 1.05825 0.002601 132 21.64 0.05 432.8 1.082 0.0025 g 17.5 21 0.048 437.5 1.008 0.002304 18 16.88 0.048 351.6667 0.81024 0.002304 19 17.62 0.047 374.8936 0.82814 0.002209 Sum 2501.16 3.396 2146.9e5 2.324448 point est 445.0361 Wid LSF 736.5018 Unwid LS 923.6536 3 mu C:tss Y.

D_ay PI nCi Day Actual FR dMorence wed square _

G.065 1080 721.77 - 0.065 1080 721.7717 358.2283 177.7951 0.2i 990.5 721.77 0.27 990.5 721.7717 268.7283 100.0522 2 174.2 390.345 2 174.2 390.3459 -216.146 119.6863 3 40.47 206.22 3 40.47 2082205 -165.75 1332226 4.3 30.33 88.38 4.3 30.33 88.38021 -58.0502 38.12875 5.2 2321 65.5485 5.2 -23.21 65.54886 -42.3387 27.34704 6.3 23.1 49.3455 6.3 23.1 49.34562 -26.2456' 13.95934 92 20.79 39.771 9.2 20.79 39.7711 -18.9811' 9.05889

~

10.3 20.67 33.298 10.3 20.67 38 29809 -17.6281 8.113971 12.3 20.75 37.5615 12.3 20.75 37.56159 -16.8116 7.52443 155' 21.64 36.825 13.2 21.64 ,36 82509 -15.1851 626168 175 21 35.352 172 21 35.35208 -14.3521 5.826597 18 16.88 35.352 18 16.88 35.35208 -18.4721 9.651989 55 17.62 34.6155 19 17.62 34.61558 -16.9950 8.344503 Sum Sqs 664.9735 Page 4

Sheets ,. ,.

Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC CINDY _

20 mu Class Y Day PI nCi IRPs: 20 mu Y Point estimate 20 mu Yunwtis _

0.065 1080 0.99 1090.909 10692 0.9801 0.27 990.5 0.99 1000.505 980.595 0.9801 2 174.2 0.53 328.6792 92.326 0.2809 a 3 40 47 026 155 6538 10.5222 0.0676 4.3 30.33 0.093 326.129  ? '"9 0.008649

~ '

0.003969 55 23.21 0.063 368.4127 3 6.3 23.1 0.041 563.4146 ' ' ii 0.001681 9.2 20.79 0.028 742.5 0.5b 212 0.000784 10.3 20.67 0.026 795 0.53742 0.000676 123 20.75 0.025 830 0.51875 0.000625 13.2 21.64 0.024 901.6667 0.51936 O!300576 17.2 21 0.022 954 5455 0.462 0.000484 18 16.88 0.022 767.2727 0.37136 0.000484 19 17.62 0.022 800.9091 8 c.38764 0.000484

~

Sum 2501.i5 3.136 2161.252 2.327112 _

point est 687.5427 _

wtd LSF 797.5638 Unwid LS 928.7271 20 mu Cfass Y

()ay Pl nCi .

Day .

Actual Fat diference wid square 0.065 1080 789.624 0.065 1080 789.5881 290.4119 106.814 027 990.5 _789.624 027 990_5 789.5881 200.9119 51.12232 2 174.2 422.728 2 174 2 422.7088 -248.509 148.0973 5 40.47 207.376 3 40.47 207.3666 166.897 134.3248 4.3 Sd.33 74.1768 4.3 30.33 74.17343 -43.8434 25.91557 5.5 23.21 50.2488 5.2 23.21 5024652 -27.0365 14.54774 6.3 23.1 ~ 32.7016 6.3 23.1 32.70011 -9.60011 2.818406 9.2 20.79 22.3328 9.2 20.79 22.33179 -1.54179 0.106445 10.3 20.67 20.7376 10.3 20.67 20.73666 -0.06 tao 0.000214 12 3 20.75 19.94 12.3 20.75 19.93909 0.810906 0.032979 15'i 21.64 19.1424 13.2 21.64 19.14153 2.493469 0.326115 17.2 21 17.5472 17.2 21 1_7.5464 3.453597 0.679759 18 16 88 17.5472 18 16.88 17.5464 JJ.6664 0.02531 19 17.62 17.5472 19 17.62 17.5464 0.073597 0.000309 _

~

Sum Sqs 482.8112 I

Page 5

Sheet 8 .. .

Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC CINDY _

15 mu Class Y Day Pt nCi IR Fs: 15 mu Y Point estimate- 15 mu Y unwtis 0.065 1GB0 1 1080 1080' 1 0.27 990.5 1 990.5 990.5 1 2 1742 0.53 328.6792 92.326 02809 3 40.47 0.27 149.8889 10.9269 0.0729 ,

4.3 .

30.33 0.1 303.3 3.033 _ 0.01 5.2 23.21 0.072 322.3611 1.67112 0.005184 _

6.3 23.1 0.05 462 1.155 0.0025 9.2 ~ 20.79 0.037 561.8919 0.76923 0.001369 10.3 20.67 0.035 590.5714 0.72345 0.001225 12.3 20.75 0.034 610.2941 0.7055 0.001156 __

13} '

21.64 0.033 655.7576 0.71412 0.001089 17.2 21 0.031 677.4194 0.651 0.000961 18 16.88 0.031 544.5161 0.52328 0.000961 39 17.62 0.03 587.3333 0.5286 0.0009 Sum 2501.16 3.253 2184 227 2.379145 point est 561.7509 Wkt LSF 768.878 Unwid LS 918.0723 15 mu Class Y Day P1 nCi Day Actual FR difference wad square 0.065 1080 768.9 0.065 1080 768.878 311.122 125.8937 0.N 990.5 768.9 0.27 990.5 768.878 221.622 63.88053 ~

2 174.2 407.517 2 1742 407.5053 -233.305 133.5722 3 40.47 207.603 3 40.47 207.597 -167.127 134.5465

, 4.3 30.33 76.89 4.3 30.33 76 8878 -46.5578 28.1921 5.2 23.21 55.3608 52 23.21 55.35921 -32.1492 18.6702P 6.3 23.1 38.445 6.3 23.1 38.4439 -15.3439 6.124124' 9.2 20.79 28.4493 9.2 20.79 28.44848 -7.65848 2.061705 10.3 20.67 26.9115 _

10.3 20.67 26.91073 -6.24073 1.447255 12.3 20.75 26.1426 12.3 20.75 26.14185 -5.39185 1.112089 13.2 21.64 25.3737 13.2 21.64 25.37297 -3.73297 0.54921 17.7 21 23.8359 172 21 23.83522 -2.83522 0.3172.51 11 16.88 23.8359 18 _ 16.88 23.83522 -6.95522 2.029562 19' 17.62 23.067 19 17.62 23.06634 -5.44634 1 285969

~

Sum Sqs 519.7025 Page 6

Sheet 9 Connecteut Yankee Worker 1 WBC-WB IRFs from LUDEP DayPI nCi IRFs: 1 mu S Point est . f t = 0.05 Point est 1 mu Type S unwtis ing unwtis 0.061 411.1 0.502 818.9243 1 411.1 206.3722 0252004 411.1 1 0.91 343.3 0.362 948.3425 -0.761 451.117 1242746 0.131044 261 2513 0.579121 2 106.3 0.222 478.8288 0.34 312.6471 23.5986 0.049284 36.142 0.1156 3 51.28 - 0.163 314.6012 0.148 346.4865 8.35864 0.026569 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.134 183.5075 0.0557 441.4722. 3.29506 0.01795S 1.369663 0 003102  !

5.2 18.42 0 126 146.1905 0.034 541.7647 2.32092 0_015876 0.62628 0.001156 I 63 16.94 0.122 138.8525 0.023 736.5217 2.06668 0.014884 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.117 142.9915 0.016 1045.625 1.95741 0.013689 026768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.116 109.8276 0.015 849.3333 1.47784 0.013456 0.1911 0.000225 13 _ 11.78 0.113 1042478 0.013 906.1538 1.33114 0.012769 G.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 1.977 2.4057 375.0531 0.547531 719.0802 1.722062

~

point est 338.6314 604 2221 Wtd LSF 512.4836 421.1581 Unwid LS 684.9897 417.5692 Day Actual Pred-1 mu Pred-lag Day Actual FR ddference wid square 0.061 411.1 2572667 421.16 0.061 411.1 2572667 153.8333 91.98495 0.91 343.3 185.519 320.5028 0.91 343.3 185.519 157.781 134.1901 2 106.3 113.7714 143.1944 2 106.3 113.7714 -7.47135 0.49 % 43 3 51.28 83.53482 62.33168 3 5128 83.53482 -322548 12.45437 4.3 24.59 68.6728 23.45861 4.3 24.59 68.6728 -44.0828 28 29786 5.2 18.42 64.57293 14.31944 52 18.42 64.57293 -46.1529 32.9874 6.3 16.94 62.52299 9.68668 6.3 16.94 62.52299 .-45.583 33.23272 9.1 16.73 59.96058 6.73856 9.1 16.73 59.96058 -432306 31.16853 10 12.74 59.44809 6.3174 10 12.74 59.44809 -46.7081 36.69833 13 11.78 57.91064 5.47508 13 11.78 57.91064 -46.1306 36.74689

~

Sum Sqs 438.2518 Page1

Sheet 9 Worker 1 LUDEP 5 mu Type S Day PI _ _ nCi IRF's: 5 mu S Point est il = 0.05 Point est 5 mu Type S unwtis log utmtis ,

0 061 411.1 0.8 513.875 1 411.1 328.88. 0.64 411.1 1

_0.91 343.3 _ 0.521 658.9251 0.761 451.117 178.8593 0271441 261.2513 0.579121 2 106.3 0.254 418.5039 0.34 312.6471 27.0002 0.064516 36.142 0.1156 3 51.25 0.143 358.6014 0.148 346.4865 7.33304 0.020449 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.091 270.2198 0.0557 441.4722 2.23769 0.008281 ;.369663 0.003102 52 18.42 - 0.078 236.1538 0.034 541.7647 1.43676 0.006084 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16.94 0.071 238.5915 0.023 736.5217 1.20274 0.005041 0.38962 0.000529 I 9.1 16.73 0.066 253.4848 0.016 1045.625 1.10418 0.004356 026768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.065 196 0.015 849.3333 0.8281 0.004225 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.063 186.9841 0.013 906.1538 0.74214 0.003969 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 2.152 2.4057 549.6242 1.028362 719.0802 1.722062

~

point est 333.134 604 222)

Wld LSF 470.8086 421.1581 Unwid LS 534.4656 417.5692 Day Actual Pred-5 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fit difference wid square 0061 411.1 376.6468 333 0.061 411.1 376.6468 34.45316 3.151547 0.91 343.3 2452913 253.413 0.91 343.3 2452913 98.00875 39.16044 2 106.3 119.5854 11322 2 106.3 119.5854 -132854 1.475942 3 5128 67.32562 49.2b4 3 5128 67.32562 -16.0456 3.824131 4.3 24.59 42.84358 18.5481 4.3 24.59 42.84358 -182536 7.776967 5.2 18.42 36.72307 11.322 5.2 18.42 36.72307 -18.3031 9.122393 6.3 16.94 33.42741 7.659 6.3 16.94 33.42741 -16.4874 8.132087 9.1 16.73 31.07336 5.328 9.1 16.73 31.07336 -14.3434 6.620851 10 12.74 30.60256 4.995 10 12.74 30.60256 -17.8626 10.42628 13 11.78 _29.66094 4.329 13 11.78 29.66094 -17.8809 10.77943 Sum Sqs 100.4701 d

i Page 2 l

L_

n...-.-.. . .

Sheet 9 Worker 1 LUDEP 10 mu Type S D_ay PI nCi IRF's: 10 mu S Point est f1 = 0.05 Point est - 10 mu Type S unwtis ing unwits

.0.061 411.1 0.753 545.9495 1 411.1 309.5583 0.567009 411.1 1 l 0 91 343.3 0.474 724.2616 0.761 451.117 162.7242 0 224676 2612513 0.579121 2 106.3 0213 499.061 0.34 312.6471 22.6419 0.045369 36.142 0.1156 3 51.28 0.106 483.7736 0.148 346.4865 5.43568 0.011236 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.056 439.1071 0.0557 441.4722 1.37704 0.003136 1.369663 0.003102 5.2 18.42 0.044 418.6364 0.034 541.7647 0.81048 0.001936 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16.94 0.038 445.7895 0.023 736.5217 0.64372 0.001444 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.033 506.9697 0.016 1045.625 0.55209 0.001089 026768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.033 386.0606 0.015 849.3333 0.42042 0.001089 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.031 380 0.013 906.1538 0.36518 0.000961 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 1.781 2.4057 504.529 0.857945 719.0802 1.722062 point est 482.9609 604.2221 I Wld LSF 568.8827 421.1581 )

Unwid LS 588.0668 417.5692 D_ay Actual Pred-10 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fit ddference wed square 0.061 411.1 428.3686 333 0.061 411.1 428.3686 -17.2686 0.696143 0.9I 343.3 269.6504 253.413 0.91 343.3 269.6504 73.64962 20.11593 2 106.3 121.172 113.22 2 106.3 121.172 -14.872 1.82531 3 51.28 60.30156 49284 3 5128 60.30156 -9.02156 1.349692 4.3 24.59 31.85743 18.5181 4.3 -24.59 31.85743 -726743 1.657871 5.2 18.42 25.03084 11.322 5.2 18.42 25.03084 -6.61084 1.745973 6.3 16.94 21.61754 7.659 6.3 16.94 21.61754 -4.67754 1.012113 9.1 16.73 18.77313 5.328 9.1 16.73 18.77313 -2.04313 0222359 lu 12.74 18.77313 4.995 10 12.74 18.77313 -6.03313 1.938869 13 11.78 17.63536 4.329 13 11.78 17.63536 -5.85536 1.94412 Sum Sqs 32.50838 ee*

Page 3

Sheet 9 Wasker 1 LUDEP 15 mu Type S D_ay PI nCi IRF's: 15 mu S Point est it = 0.05 . Point est 15 mu Type S unwtis Ing unwtis 0.061 411.1 0.695 591.5108 1 411.1 285.7145 ' O.483025 411.1 1 0.95 343.3 0.431 796.5197 0.761 451.117 147.9623 0.185761 2612513 0.579121 2 106.3 ' O.187 568.4492 0.34 312.6471 19.8781 0.034969 36.142 0.1156 3 .

51.28 0 087 _589.4253 0.148 346.4865 4.46136 0.007569 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.04 614.75 0.0557 441.4722 0.9836 0.0016 1.369663 0.003102 5.2 18.42 0.029 635.1724 0.034 541.7647 0.53418 0.000841 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16 94 0.024 705.8333 0.023 736.5217 0.40656 0.000576 0.38962 0.000529 _

9.1 16.h 0.02 836.5 0.016 1045.625 0.3346 0.0004 0.26768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.02 637 0.015 849.3333 0.2548 0.0004 0.1911 0.000225  ;

13 11.78 0.019 620 0.013 906.1538 0.22382 0.000361 0.15314 0.000169  !

Sum 1013.18 1.552 2.4057 460.7S38 0.715502 719.0802 1.722062

~

point est 659.5161 604.2221 Wld LSF 652.8222 421.1581 Unwid LS 643.9588 417.5692 D_ay Actual Pred-15 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fu difference wid square 411.1 453.7099 333 0.061 411.1 453.7114 -42.6114 4.001953 0.06_1 0.91 343.3 281.3654 253.413 0.91 343.3 281.3664 61.93365 13.63268 2 106.3 122.0773 113.22 2 106.3 122.0777 -15.7777 2.03917 3 51.28 56.79534 49.284 3 5128 56.79553 -5.51553 0.535624 4.3 24.59 26.1128 18.5481 4.3 24.59 26.11289 -1.52289 0.088814 5.2 18.42 18.93178 11.322 52 18.42 18.93184 -0.51184 0.013838 6.3 16.94 15.66768 7.659 6.3 16.94 15.66773 1 272268 0.103312 9.1 16.73 13.0564 5.328 9.1 16.73 13.05644 3.673557 1.033591 10 12.74 13.0564 4.995 10 12.74 13.05644 -0.31644 0.007669 13 11.78 12.40358 4.329 13 11.78 12.40362 -0.62362 0.031354 Sum Sqs 21.488 6

_ .1 Page 4

Sheet 9 Worker 1 LUDEP 20 mu Typed Day P1 nCi IRF's: 20 mu S Point est f1 = 0.05 Point est 20 mu Type S unwits Ing unwtls .

0.061 411.1 0.G51 631.49 1 411.1 267.6261 0.423801 411.1 1 0 91 343.3 0.431 796.5197 0.761 451.117 147.9623 0.185761 261.2513 0.579121 2 106.3 0.187 568.4492 0.34 312.6471 19.8781 0.034969 36.142 0.1156 3 5128 0.087 589.4253 0.148 346.4865 4.46136 0.007569 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.04 614.75 0.0557 441.4722 0.9836 0.0016 1.369663 0.003102 5;2 18.42 0.029 635.1724 0.034 541.7647 0.53418 0.000841 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16.94 0.024 705 8333 0.023 736.5217 0.40656 0.000576 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.02 836.5 0.016 1045.625. 0.3346 0.0004 0.26768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.02 637 0.015 849.3333 02548 0.0004 0.1911. 0.000225 13 11.78 0.019 620 0.013 906.1538 022382 0.000361 0.15314 0.000169 i Sum 1013.18 1.508 2.4057 442.6654 0.656278 719.0802 1.722062 point est 663.514 604.2221 Wld LSF 671.87 421.1581 Unwid LS 674.509 417.5692 i

Day Actual Pred-20 mu Pred-Ing _ Day Actual Fit difference wtd square 0.061 .

411.1 437.3874 333 0.061 411.1 437.3874 -26.2874 1.579896 0.91 343.3 289.576 253.413 0.91 343.3 289.576 53.72402 9.967229 2 106.3 125.6397 11322 2 106.3 125.6397 -19.3397 2.976956 3 51.28 58.45269 49.284 3 5128 58.45269 -7.17269 0.880156 4.3 24.59 26.8748 18.5481 4.3 24.59 26.8748 -22848 0.194246 53 18.42 19.48423 11.322 52 18.42 19.48423 -1.06423 0.058128 1 6.3 16.94 16.12488 7.659 6.3 16.94 16.12488 0.815119 0.041205 9.1 16.73 13.4374 5.328 9.1 16.73 13.4174 3.292599 0.806794 10 12.74 13.4374 4.995 10 12.74 13.4374 -0.6974 0.036195 13 11.78 12.76553 4.329 13 11.78 12.76553 -0.98553 0.076085 Sum Sgs_ 16.61689 Page 5

Sheet 9 Worker 1 LUDEP 25 mu Type S

/ Day PI nCi IRFs: 25 mu S Point est it = 0.05 Point est 25 mu Type S unwtis Ing unwits 0 061 411.1 0.618 665.2104 1 411.1 254.0598 0.381924 411.1 1 035 343.3 0.377 910.6101 0.761 451.117 129.4241 0.142129 261.2513 0.579121 2 106.3 0.159 668.5535 0.34 312.6471 16.9017 0.025281 36.142 0.1156 ,

l 3 51.28 O.069 743.1884 0.148 346.4865 3.53832 0.004761 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.028 878.2143 OP557 441.4722 0.68852 0.000784 1.369663 0.003102 52 18.42 0.018 1023.333 0.034 541.7647 0.33156 0.000324 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16.94 0.013 1303.077 0.023 736.5217 0.22022 0.000169 0.33962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.011 1520.909 0.016 1045.625 0.18403 0.000121 0 26768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.01 1274 0.015 849.3333 0.1274 0.0001 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.0094 1253.191 0.013 906.1533 0.110732 8.84E-05 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 1.3124 2.4057 405.5864 0.555681 719.0802 1.722062 point est 1024.029 604.2221 Wtd LSF 772.0055 421.1581 Unwid LS 729.8902 417.5692 D_ay Actual Pred-25 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fit difference wed square 0.061 411.1 477.096 333 0.061 411.1 477.0994 -65.9994 9.130004 0.91 343.3 291.044 253.413 0.91 343.3 291.0461 52.25393 9.381585 2 106.3 122.748 11322 2 106.3 122.7489 -16.4489 2204219 3 51.28 53268 49284 3 5128 5326838 -1.98838 0.074221 4.3 24.59 21.616 18.5481 4.3 24.59 21.61615 2.973848 0.409127 52 18.42 13.896 11.322 5.2 18.42 13.8961 4.523901 1.472765 6.3 16.94 10.036 7.659 6.3 16.94 10.03607 6.903929 4.749292 9.1 16.73 8.492 5.328 9.1 16.73 8.49206 8 23794 7.991423 10 12.74 7.72 4.995 10 12.74 7.720055 5.019945 3264206 13 11.78 7.2568 4.329 13 11.78 7.256852 4.523148 2.819249 Sum Sqs 41.49609 O

Page 6

.+- :g .

Sheet 9 Merli.uoeP 30 mu Type S D_ay Pi nCi IRFs: 30 mu S Point est it = 0.05 ' Point est 30 mu Type S unweis Ing umwes ,

0.061 411.1 0.594 692.0875 1 411.1 244.1934 0.352836 411.1 1 '!

0.91 343.3 0.361 950.9695 0.761 -451.117 123.9313 0.130321 261 2513 0.579121 0.151 703.9735 - 0.34 312.6471 16.0513 0.022801 36.142 0.1156 -l 2 106.3 3 5128 0.065 788.9231 0.148 346.4865 3.3332 0.004225 7.58944 0.021904 )

4.3 24.59 0.025 -983.6 0.0557 441.4722 0.61475 0.000625 1.369863 0.003102 5.2 '18.42 0.016 1151.25 0.034 541.7647 029472 0.000256 0.62628 0.001156 _

6.3 16.94 0.011 1540 0.023 736.5217 0.18634 0.000121 0.38962 0.0005:.g 9.1 16.73 0.0085 1968.235 0.016 1045.625, 0.142205 7.23E-05 026768 0.000250 10 12.74 0.0082 1553.659 0.015 849.3333 0.104468 6.72E-05 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.0075 1570.667 0.013 906.1538 0.08835 5.63E-05 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 1.2472 2.4057 -388.94 0.511381 719.0002 1.722062 >

point est 1190.336 604 2221 WId LSF 812.3637 421.1581 Unwid LS 760.5684 417.5692 Day Actual Pred-30 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual Fit diference wed square 0.061 411.1 482.5418 333 0.061 411.1 482.544 -71.444 10.57779 0.91 343.3 293262 253.413 0.91 343.3 293.2633 50.03671 8.537284 2 106.3 122.6664 113.22 2 106.3 122.6669 -16.3669 2.183767 3 5128 52.8034 49.284 3 5128 52.80364 -1.52364 0.043964 4.3 24.59 20.309 18.5481 4.3 24.59 20.30909 4.280908 0.902363 5.2 18.42 12.99776 11.322 52 18.42 12.99782 5.422181 2.231921 I

6.3 16.94 8.93596 7.659 6.3 16.94 8.936001 8.003999 7.169203 93 16.73 6.90506 5.328 9.1 16.73 6.905091 9.824909 13.97937 II) 12.74 6.661352 4.995 '

10 12.74 6.661382 6.078618 5.546936 11.78 6.0927 4.329 13 11.78 6.092728 5.687272 5.306799

__13

~

Sum Sqs 56.5113 Page 7

.*. ...l Sheet 9 Connecticut Yankee Worker 1 WBC-WB IRFs from LUDEP {

Day PI .nCi IRFs: 1 mu S Point est it = 0 05 Point est 1 mu Type S unwtis Ing u_nwtis 0 061 411.1 0.502 818.9243 1 411.1 206.3722 0 252004 411.1 1 0.91 343.3 0.363 945.73 0.761 451.117 124.6179 0.131769 2612513 0.579121 2 106.3 0.256 415.2344 0.34 312.6471 27.2128 0.065536 36.142 0.1156 3 5128 0.168 3052381 0.148 346.4865 8.61504 0.028224 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.139 176.9065 0.0557 441.4722 3.41801 0.019 21 1.369663 0.003102 __

5.2 18.42 0.132 139.5455 0.034 541.7647 2.43144 0.017424 0.62628 0.001156 6.3 16.94 0.128 132.3438 0.023 736.5217 2.16832 0.016384 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.124 , 134.9194 0.016 1045.625 2.07452 0.015376 0 26768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.123 103.5772 0.015 849.3333 1.56702 0.015129 0.1911 0.000225 13 11.78 0.12 98.16667 0.013 906.1538 1.4136 0.0144 0.15314 0.000169 Sum 1013.18 2.055 2.4057 379.8909 0.575567 719.G302 1.722062 point est 327.0586 604 2221

! Wtd LSF 493.0316 421.1581 Unwid LS 660.0289 417.5692 100% ing least squares D_ay Actual Pred-1 mu Pred-Ing _ D_ay actual FR difference wed square 0.061 411.1 247.486 333 0.061 411.1 247.5019 163.5981 108.1379 0.91 343.3 178.959 253.413 0.91 343.3 178.9705 164.3295 150.8863 2 106.3 ~ 126.208 11322 2 106.3 128.21H -19.9161 3.142633 3 51.28 82.824 49.284 3 5128 82.8293I -31.5493 12.01699 13 24.59 68.527 18.5481 4.3 24.59 68.5314 -43.9414 28.17462 52 18.42 65.076 11.322 5.2 18.42 65.08018 -46.6602 33.45369 6.3 16.94 63.104 7.659 6.3 16.94 63.10805 -46.#68 33.77523 9.1 16.73 61.132 5.328 9.1 16.73 61.13592 -44.4059 32.25413 10 12.74 60.639 4.995 10 12.74 60.64289 -47.9029 37.83934 13 _ 11.78 59.16 4.329 13 11.78 59.1638 -47.3838 37.94929 Sum Sqs_ 477.6302 I

Page 8

Sheet 9 9

IWorker 1 LUDEP 8 mu_ Type S D_ay PI nCi IRF's: 8 mu S Point est f1 = 0.05 Point est 8 mu Type S unwtis ing ur:wils 0.061 411.1 0.778 528.4062 1 411.1 319.8358 0.605284 411.1 1 0.91 343.3 0.495 693.5354 0.761 451.117 169.9335 0245025 261 2513 0.579121 2 106.3 0228 _466.2281 0.34 312.6471 24.2364 0.051984 36.142 0.1156 3 51.28 0.118 434.5763 0.148 346.4865 6.05104 0.013924 7.58944 0.021904 4.3 24.59 0.066 372.5758 0.0557 441.4722 1.62294 0.004356 1.369663 0.003102 52 18.42 0.054 341.1111 0.034 541.7647 0.99468 0.002916 0.62628 0.001156 6} 16.94 0.047 360.4255 0.023 736.5217 0.79618 0.002209 0.38962 0.000529 9.1 16.73 0.043 389.0698 0.016 1045.625 0.71939 0.001849 0.26768 0.000256 10 12.74 0.042 303.3333 0.015_ 849.3333 0.53508 0.001764 0.1911 0.000225 13 1' 78 0.04 294.5 0.013 906.1538 0.4712 0.0016 0.15314 0.000169 Sam 1013.18 1.911 2.4057 __525.1962 0.930911 719.0802 1.722062 point est 418.3761 604 2221 Wid LSF 530.1832 421.1581 Unwid LS 564.1745 417.5692 Day Aciual Pred-8 mu Pred-Ing Day Actual FR difference wid square 0.061, 411.1 412.4956 333 0.061 411.1 412.4825 -1.38249 0.004634 0.91 343.3 262.449 253.413 0.91 343.3 262.4407 80.85934 24.91319 2 106.3 120.8856 113.22 '2 106."3 120.8818 -14.5818 1.758972 3 51.28 62.5636 49.234 3 5128 62.56161 -112816 2.034391 ,

4.3 24.59 _ 34.9932 18.5481 4.3 24.59 34.99209 -10.4021 3.092226 5.2 18.42 28.6308 11.322 52 18.42 28.62989 -10.2099 3.641015

, 6.3 16.94 24.9194 7.659 6.3 16.94 24.91861 -7.97861 2.554645

_ 9.1 1_6.73 22.7986 5.328 9.1 16.73 22.79788 -6.06788 1.615024 10 12.74 22.2684 4.995 10 12.74 22.26769 -9.52169 4.07662 13 11.78 21.208 4.329 13 11.78 21 20733 -9.42733 4.190744 Sum Sqs 47.88146 Page 9

. . , _ . . . . .. . . . -.m;,was.s--

-;-,. a

....w.. . .. ...wa.. . . . . . . . . .. . .

Sheet 10 ,

.* .*)

Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC LUDEP __ _

1.0 mu Type S . _ _ , .

Day PI nCi IRF's: 1.0 mu S Point esti f t = 0.05 Point est 1.0 mu S unwtis ingestion unweis O_065 1080 .

0.502 2151.394 1 -1080 542.16 0 252004 1080 1 0.27 990.5 0.47 2107.447 0.986 1004.564 465.535 02209 976 633 0.972196 2 '174.2 0222 784.6847 0.34 512.3529 38.6724 0.049284 59228 0.1156 3 40T47 0.163 2482822 0.148273.4459 6.59661 0.026569 5.98956 0 021904 4.3~

30.33 0.131 231.5267 0.049 618.9796 -3.97323 0.017161 1.48617 0.002401 i 5.5 5 72 i 0.126 1842063 0.034 682.6471 2.92446 0.015876 0.78914 0.001156 i 6.3 23.1 0.122 189.3443 0.023 1004.348 2.8182 0.014884 0.5313 0.000529 92 20.79 0.117 177.6923 0.016 1299.375 2.43243 0.013689 0.33264 0.000256 10.3 20.67 0.116 178.1897 0.015 1378 2.39772 0.013456 0.31005 0.000225 12.3 20.75 0.113 183.6283 0.013 1596.154 2.34475 0.012769 0.26975 0.000169 13.2 21.64 0.112 1932143 0.013 1664.615 2.42368 0.012544 028132 0.000169 17.2 21 0.109 192.6606 0.011 1909.091 2.289 0.011881 0.231 0.000121 18 16.88 0.108 156 2963 0.011 1534.545 1.82304 0.011664 0.18568 0.000121 19' 17.65 0.107 164.6729 0.011 1601.818 1.88534 0.011449 0.19382 0.000121 Sum 2501.16 2.518 2.67 1078.276 0.68413 2126.461 2.114968 point est 510.2314 1154.281 Wld LSF 993.3122 936.764 Unwid LS 1576.127 1005.434 Day PI nCi Day Actual Fit ddference wtd square 0.065 1080 498.6416 0.065 1080 498.6427 581.3573 . 677.7926 027 990.5 466.8557 027 930.5 466.8567 523.6433 587.3372 i

2 1742 220.5148 2 1742 220.5153 -46.3153 9.727701_

3 40.47 161.9095 3 40.47 161.9099 -121.44 91.08551 4.3 30.33 130.1236 4.3 30.33 130.1239 -99.7939 76.53338 5I5 2321 125.1571 5.2 23.21 125.1573 -101.947 83.04155 6.5 23.1 121.1838 ~

6.3 23.1 121.1841 -98.0841 79.38738 9.5 20.79 116.2173 9.2 20.79 116.2175 -95.4275 78.35662

~

10.3 20 67 115 224 ~~

10.3 20.67 1152242 -94.5542 77.59219 ~

12.3 5035 112.244 12.3 20.75 112.2443 -91.4943 74.58022 15~2 21.64 111.2507 13.2 21.64 111.251 -89.611 72.18077

[ ~ ~ 'if.I ~5 2 108.2708 17.2 21 108271 -87.271 70.34414 18 16.88 107.2775 18 16.88 107.2777 -90.3977 76.17376 19 17.62 106.2842 19 17.62 1062844 -88.6644 73.96547 l

Sum Sqs 2128.098 Panes u , /

Sheet 10 **"

. '**l Connecticut -/ankee U.orker 2 WBC LUDEP 52 mu Type S ,

Day PI nCe .IRF's: 5.0 mu S Point estimate 5.0 mu S unwes 0.065 1080 0.798 1353.383 861.84 0.636804 l 0.27 990.5 0.734 1349.455 :727.027 0338756 2 174.2 0254 685.8268 <

44 2466 0.064516 3 40.47 0.143 283.007 5.78721 0.02G449 ,

4.3 30.33 0.087 348.6207 2.63871 0.007569 52 23.21 0.078 297.5641 1.81038 0.006064 l 6.3 23.1 0.071 325.3521 1.6401 0.005041 9.2 20.79 0.066 315 1.37214 0.004356 10.3 20.67 ' O.065 318 1.34355 0.004225 12.3 20.75 0.063 329.3651 '1.30725 0.003969 132 21.S4 0.063 343.4921 1.36332 0.003969 172 21 0.06 -350 126 0.0036 18 16.88 0.059 286.1017 0.99592 0.003481 ,

19 17.62 0.059 298.6441 1.03958 0.0'.)3481 Sum 2501.16 2.6 1653.672 1.3063 __

point est 491.7009 Wld LSF 961.9846 Unwid LS 1265.921 D_ay PI nCi Day Actual Fit - dwerence wed square 0.065 1080 767.66 0.065 1080 767.6637 312.3363 127.079

_ 0.27 990.5 706.0933 0.27 990.5 706.0967 284.4033 114.5526 2 174.2 244.3429 2 174 2 244.3441 -70.1441 20.13633 3 40.47 137.5631 3 40.47 137.5638 -97.0938 68.5297 4.3 30.33 83.69226 4.3 30.33 83.69266 -53.3627 34.02417 5.2 23.21 75.03444 5.2 23.21 75.0348 -51.8248 35.79419 6.3 23.1 68.30058 6.3 23.1 68.30091 -452009 29 91354 9.2 20.79 63.49068 9.2 20.79 63.49098 -42.701 28.71863

__ 10.3 20.67 62.5287 10.3 20.67 62.529 .-41.859 28.02181 12.3 20.75 60.60474 12.3 20.75 60.60503 -39.855 2620943

_ _13 2 21.64 60.60474 -132 21.64 60.60503 -38.965 25.05194

_ 172 21 57.7188 17.2 21 57.71906 -36.7191 23.35953 18 16.88 56.75682 18 16.88 56.75709 -39.8771 28.01734 19 17.62 _ 56.75682 19 17.62 56.75709 -39.1371 26.98715 Sum Sqs 616.3954

' Page 2

ShrM10 ** **!

Connechcut Yankee Worker 2 WBC LUDEP 4 10 mu Type S Day Pt nCi IF F s: 10 mu S Point eshmate 10 mu S unwes 0.065 1980 0.752 1436.17 812.16 0.565504 0.27 990.5 0.686 1443.878 679.483 0.470596 2 174.2 0213 817.8404 37.1046 0.045369 3 40.47 0.106 381.7925 4 28982 0.011236

~- ~

i 43 30.33 0.052 5832692 1.57716 0.002704 52 2321 0 044 527.5 1.02124 0.001936  !

6.3 23.1 0.038 607.8947 0.6?18 0.001444 92 20.79 0.033 630 0.68607 0.001089 -'

10.3 20.67 0.033 626.3636 0.68211 0.001089 123 20.75 0.032 648.4375 0.664 0.001024 13.2 21.64 0.031 698.0645 0.67084 0 000961 17.2 21 0.03 700 0.63 0.0009 18 16.88 0.029 :,82.069 0.48952 0.000841 19 17.62 0.029 607.5862 0.51096 0.000841 Sum 2501.16 2.108 1540.847 1.105534 point est 735.0618 ,

Wid LSF 1186.509 '

UnwksLS 1393.758 nCi [

Day PI Day Actual FR dfference wid square 0.065 1080 892248 0.065 1080 8922544 187.7456 39.50488 0.27 990.5 813.939 027 990.5 813.9449 176.5551 38 29709 2 174 2 252.7245 2 1742 252.7263 -78.5263 2439945 [

3 40.47 125.169 3 40.47 125.7699 -852999 57.85226 4.3 30.33 61.698 43 30.33 61.69844 -31.3684 15.9482 52 2321 52206 52 23.21 5220638 -28.9964 16.10512 6.3 23.1 45.087 6.3 23.1 45.08732 -21.9873 10.72236 9.2 20.79 39.1545 92 20.79 39.15478 -18.J648 8.61364 103 20.67 39.1545 10.3 20.67 39.15478 -18.4848 8.726575  ;

12.3 20.75 37.968 123 20.75 37.96827 -17.2183 7.808333 j 13 2 21.64 36.7815 132 21.64 36.78176 -15.1418 6 2.s3334 17.2 f 21 35.595 172 21 35.59526 -14.5953 5.964548 18 16.88  :

34.4085 18 16.88 34.40875 -17.5287 8.929619 '

19 17.62 34.4085 19 17.62 34.40875 -16.7887 8.191581

_ Sum Sets _

237317 i

Page 3 I i

Sheet 10 I*~ .-

Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC LUDEP 15 mu Type S _

Day PI nCi IRF's: 15 mu S Point estimate 15 mu S unwits _

0.065 1080 0.694 1556.196 149.52 0.481636 027 990.5 0.631 1569.731 625.0055 0.398161 2 174.2 0.187 931.5508 32.5754 0.034 % 9 ~~

3 40.47 0.087 465.1724 3.52089 0.007569 4.3 30.33 0.037 819.7297 1.12221 0.001369 5.2 23.21 0.029 800.3448 0.67309 0.000841 6.3 23.1_. 0.024 9625 0.5544 0.000576 9.2 20.79 0.02 1039.5 0.4158 0.0004 10.3 20 67 0.02 1033.5 0.4134 0.0004 12.3 20.75 0.019 1092.105 0.39425 0.000361 ~

13.2 21.64 0.019 1138.947 ~

0.41116 0.000361 ~

17.2 25 0.017 1235294 0.357 0.000289 18 16 88 0.017 992.9412 0.28696 0.000289

, 19 17.62 0.017 1036.471 029954 0.000289

• Qm 2501.16 1.818 1415.55 0.92751 point est 1048.142 Wtd LSF 1375.776 Unwid LS 1526.1r -

Day Pi nCi Day Adual Fit d5erence wk! sy;are .

0.065 1080 954.7913 0.065 1080 954.7883 1252117 16.42038 0.27 990.5 868.1172 027 990.5 P68.1144 122.3856 1725376 2 174.2 2F 27C9 2 1742 25727 -83.07 26.82252 3 40.47 119.6929 3 40.47 119.6925 -792225 52.43605 4.3 30.33 50.90386 4.3 30.33 50.9037 -20.5737 8.31525 i 5.2 2321 39.89762 52 2321- 39.89749 -16.6875 6.979696 6.3 23.1 33.01872 6.3 23.1 33.01861 -9.91861 2.979498 92 20.79 27.5156 92 20.79 27.51551 -6.72551 1.643891 10.3 20.67 27.5156 ,

10.3 20.67 27.51551 -6.84551 1.703077 12.3 20.75 26.13982 12.3 20.75 23.13974 -5.38974 1.111306 13.2 21.64 26.13982 132 21.64 26.13974 #.49974 0.774592 17.2 21 23.38826 17.2 21 23.38818 -2.38818 0243859 18 16.88 23.38826 18 16.88 23.38818 -6.50818 1.81102 15, 17.62 23.38826 19 47.62 23.38818 -5.76813 1.422597 Sum Sqs 139.9175 Page 4

Sheet 10 e* .-i Connecticut a akee Worker 2 WBC LUDEP 20 mu Type S Day Pi lnCi IRF's: 20 mu S Point estimate 20 mu S unwits

- 0 065" 1080 0.65 1661.538 702 0.4225 027 990.5 0.59 1678.814 584.395 0.3481 2 1742 0.17 1024.706 29.614 0.0289 3 40.47 0.076 532.5 3.07572 0.005776 4.3 30.33 0.029 1045.862 0.87957 0.000841 Si 23.21 0.022 1055 0.51062 0.000484 6.3 23.1 0.017 1358.824 0.3927 0.000289 92 20 79 0.014 1485 0 29106 0 000196 10.3 20.67 0.013 1590 0.26871 0.000169 12.3 20.75 0.013 1596.154 026975 0.000169 13.2 2*.64 0.013 1664.615 0 28132 0.000169 17.2 21 0 012 1750 0252 0.000144 18 16.88 0.012 1406.667 0.20256 0.000144 19 17.62 0.011 1601.818 0.19382 0.000121 _

$eym 2501.16 1.642 1322.627 0.808002_

point est 1389.393 Wid LSF 152324 Unwid LS 1636.91 DiPl ..nCi Day Actual FR difference wtd square 0.065 1080 , 990.106 0.0S5 1080 990.f06 89.89403 8.161689 02,7 990.5 898.7116 027 990.5 898.7116 91.78843 9.37466 2 174.2 258.9508 2 1742 258.9508 -84.7508 27.73769 3 40.47 115.7662 3 _ 40.47 115.7662 -752962 48.97389 4.3 30.33 44.17396 4.3 30.33 44.17396 -13.844 4.338646

~

52 23.25 33.51128 5.2 23.21 33.51128 -10.3013 3.166586 6.3 23.1 25.895G8 6.3 23.1 25.89508 -2.79508 ~301697 0

92 20.79 21.32536 9.2 20.79 21.32536 -0.53536 0.01344 103 20.67 19.80212 10.3 20.67 19.80212 0.867881 0.038037 12.3 20.75 19.80212 12.3 20.75 19.80212 0.947881 0.045313 13.2 21.64 ;9.80212 13.2 21.64 19.80212 1.837881 0.170578 17'2 21 1827888 17.2 21 1827888 2.721121 0.405085 18 16.88 18.27888 18 16.88 1827888 -1.39888 0.107056 _

19 17.62 16.75564 19 17.62 16.75564 0.864361 0.044589

~

Sum Sqs, 102.879 Page 5

Sheet 10 ,* .-l Connecicut Yankee Worker 2 WBC LUDEP 25 mu Type S l 0 .g ( nCi IRF's: 25 mu S Poir.t estimate 25 mu S unwtts ,

w ' 'j 1080 0.617 1750.405 666.36 0.380689 l 0:.I 990.5 0.559 1771.914 553.6895 0.312481 2 174.2 0.159 1095.597 27.6978 0.025281 3 40 47 0.069 586.5217 2.79243 0.004761 4.3 30.33 0.025 12132 0.75825 _0.000625 52 2321 0.018 i289.444 0.41778 0.000324 6.3 23.1 0.013 1776.923 _

0.3003 0.000169 92 20.79. 0.01 2079 02079 0.0001 10.3 20.67 0.01 2067 02067 0.0001 12.3 20 75 0.0096 2161.458 0.1992 922E-05 132 21 64 0.0094 2302.128 0203416 8.84 E-05 __

172 21 0.0087 2413J93 0.1827 7.57E-05 18 16.88 0.0085 1985.882 0.14348 7.23E-05 19 17J2, 0.0084 2097.619 0.148005 7.06E-05 Sum j501.16 1.5246 1253.307 0.724929 point est 1756.492 Wld LSF 1640.535 Unwtd LS 1728.869 Day P1 0065 nCi 1080

[* 1012213 Day 0.065 Actual 1(e80 Fit ddference wtd square 1012.21 67.78977 4.540013 027 990J 917.0619 027 990.5 917.0592 73.44081 5.881357 2 1742 260.8459 2 174 2 260.8451 -86.6;51 28.78096 3 40.47 113.1973 3 40.47 113.1969 -72.7269 46.72571 4.3 30.33 41.0135 4.3 30.33 41.01338 -10.6834 2.782863 _

52 2321 29.52972 52 2321 29.52963 -6.31963 1.352464 6.3 23.1 21.32702 6.3 23.1 21.32696 1.773042 0.147404 9.2 20.79 16.4054 92 20.79 16.4053s 4.384648 1.17188'!

10.3 20.67 16.4054 10.3 20.67 16.40535 4264648 1.108615 12.3 20.75 15.74916 12.3 20J5 15.74914 5.000862 1.587936 13.2. . 21.64 15.42108 132 21.64 15.42103 6218 % 9 2.507976 17.2 21 14 2727 172 21 14.27266 6.727344 3.170899 18 16.88 13.94459 18 16.88 13.94455 2.935451 C.617938 19 17.62 13.78054 19 17.62 13.7805 3 839504 1.069758 Sum Sqs 101.4458 1

Page 6

Sheet 13 ,. * .-

Connedicut Yankee Worker 2 WBC LUDEP _

30 mu Type S Day Pt nCi IRF's: 30rr.a S Point estamate 30 mu S unwits 0.065 1080 0.592 1824.324 63936 0.350464 0.27 990.5 0.537 1844.507 531.8985 0288369 2 1742 0.151 1153.642 26.3042 0.022801 3 _

40.47 0.065 622.6154 2.63055 0.004225 4.3 30.33 0.022 1378.636 0.66726 0.000484 52, 23 21 0.016 1450.625 . 0 37136 0.000256 6 3l 23.1 0.011 2100 02541 0.000121 9.. ,,

20.79 0.0085 2445.882 0.176715 7.23E-05 103 20.67 0.0061 2551.852 0.167427 6.56E-05 12.3 20.75 0.0077 2694.805 0.159775 5.93E-05 132 21.64 0.0075 2885333 0.1623 5.63E-05 1/2 21 0.0069 3043.478 0.1449 4.76E-05 18 16.88 0.0068 2482353 0.114784 4.62E-05 19 17.62 0.0066 2669.6971 0.116292 436E-05 Sum 2501.16 1.4461 1202.528 0.667111 point est 2081.982 Wid LSF 1729.59 Unwid LS 1802.591 Day Pi ef' Day Adual FR difference wid square 0.065 1080 1023.917 0.065 1080 1023.917 56.08276 3.071807 027 990.5 928.7892 027 990.5 92E.7898 61.71021 4.10012 2 174 2 261.1681 2 174.2 261.1681 -86.9681 28.96007 3 40.47 112.4234 3 40.47 112.4233 -71.9533 46.05168 4.3 30.33 38.05098 43 3033 38.05098 -7.72098 1.566675 5.2 2321 27.67344 5.2 2321 27.67344 -4.46344 0.719906 6.3 23.1 19.02549 63 23.1 19.02549 4.074511 0.8726 92 .

20.79 14.70152 92 20.79 14.70151 6.088486 2.521486 10.3 20 67 14.00968 103 20.67 14.00968 6.660322 3.166374 123 20.75 1331784 123 20.75 1331784 7.432158 4.147591 13 2 21.64 12.97193 132 21.64 12.97192 8.8Mi8076 5.792165 17.2 21 11.93417 17.2 21 11.93417 9.065829 6.886885 18 16.88 11.76121 18 16.83 11.76121 5.118788 2.227831 19 17.62 11.41529 19 17.62 11.41529 6 204706 3 372527 Sum Sqs 113.4577 Page 7

Shect10 ,* .-l Connecticut Yankee Worker 2 WBC LUDEP _

pure ingestion DayPI nCi IRF's: 1.0 mu S Point esti f1 = 0.05 Point est 1.0 mu S unwt!s ingestion unwtts

_0 065 1080 0.639 1690.141 1 1080 ti90.12 0.408321 1080 1 j 0.981 1009.684 630.9485 0.405769 0.2 / 990.5 0.637 1554.945 971.6805 0.962361 2 174 2 0.424 410.8491 0.329 529.4833 73.8608 0.179776 57.3118 0.108241 3 40.47 0297 136262E' ~0.? 47 285 12.01959 0.088209 5.74674 0 020164 4.3 ~ 30.33 0215 141.0690 0.054 561.6667 6.52095O.046225 1.63782 0 002916

-~3 2321 0.186 124.7849 0.0326 711.9632 4 31706 0.034596 0.756646 0.001063 63 23.1 0.171 135.0877 0.022 1053 3.9501 0.029241 0.50C2 0.000484 9_2 20.79 0.158 131.5823 0.015 1386 3 28482 0.024964 0.311 0.000225 10 3 20.67 0.157 131.6561 C.0142 1455.634 3.24519 0.024649 02935{14 0.000202 12.3 20.75 0.156 133.0128 0.0133 1560.15 3.237 0.024336 0 275975 0.000177 132 21.S4 0.155 139.6129 0.0129 1677.519 33542 0.024025 0 275556 0.000166 172 21 0.153 1372549 0.0113 1856.407 3213 0.023409 023.*3 0.000128 18 16.88 0.153 110.3268 0.011 1534.545 2.58264 0.023409 0.1%bd 0.000121 19 17.62 0.152 115.9211 0.0106 1662264 2.67824 0.023104 0.186772 0.G00112 Sum 2501.16 3.653 2.6489 1443332 1360033 2119.412 2.09636 point est 363.7505 1168.737 Wld LSF 684.6866 944.2259 Unwtd LS 1061.248 1010.996 Day PI nCi Day Actual FR diference wid square 0065 1080 94423 0.065 1080 437.51'74 642.4853 943.4822 _

_ , 0.27 990.5 9262896 027 990.5 436.1453 554.3547 704.6025 2 174 2 310.6517 2 1742 2903071 -116.107 46.43655 3 40.47 134.0807 3 40.47 2033519 -162.8c2 130.466 4.3 3033 50.98842 4.3 30.33 1472076 -116.878 92.79667 52 2321 30.7819 52 2321 1273517 -104.142 85.16175 63 23.1 20.77306 63 23.1 117.0814 -93.9814 75.439 92 20.79 14.16345 92 20.79 108.1805 -87.2905 70.59587 10.3 20.67 13.40807 103 20.67 107.4958 -86.8258 70.13035 12.3 20.75 12.53826 12.3 20.75 106.8111 -86.0611 69.34217 13.2 21.64 12.18057 132 21.64 106.1264 -84.4864 6725898 17.2 21 10.6698 17.2 21 104.757 -83.157 66.96678 18 16.88 10.38653 18 16.68 104.757 -87.877 73.717 19 17.62 10.00884 19 17.62 104.0724 -86.4524 71.81552 _

~ ~

Sum Sqs 2568 211 Page8 I

o ~

Shee110 '* **

Connedcut Yankee Worker 2 WBC LUDEP l 8 mu Type S_ , l DayPI nCi IRFs: 8muS Point estimate 8 mu S unwits j 0 065 1D80 0.776 1391.753 838.08 ' O.602176 027 990.5 0.711 1393.108 7042455 G.505521 2 174 2 0228 764.0351 39.7176' O.051984 3 40.47 0.118 342.9661 4.77546 0.013924 4.3 30 33 0.062 489.1935 1.88046 0.003844 5.2 2321 0.054 429.8148 1 25334 0.002916 6.3 23.1 0.047 491.4894 1.0857 0.002209 92 20.79( 0.043 483.4884 0.89397 0.001849 10.3 20.67 0.042 492.1429 0.86814 0.001764 12.3.. 20.75 0.041 506.0976 085075 0.001681 13 2 21.64 0 04 541 0.8656 0.0016 17.2 21 0.038 552.6316 0.708 0.001444 18 16.88 0 038 444 2105 0.64144 0.001444 19 17.62 0.038 463.6842 0.66956 0.001444 Sum _2501.16 2.276 1596.626 1.1938 point est 627J5439 Wld LF 1098.928 Unwid LS 1337.431 Day PI nCi Day Actual Fit diference wtd square 0065 .

1080 852.824 0.065 1080 852.7681 2272319 60.5491 027 990.5 781.389 C27 990.5 781.3378 209.1622 55.99222 2 1742 250.572 2 1742 250.5556 -76.3556 2326898 3 40.47 129.682 3 40.47 129.6735 -892035 61.36384 4.3 30.33 68.138 4.3 33.33 68.13353 -37.8035 20.97509 52 2321 59.346 5.2 23.21 59.34211 -36.1321 22.00005 6.3 23.1 51.653 6.3 23.1 51 64961 -28.5496 15.78096 92 20.79 47.257 92 20.79 472539 26.4639 14.82075 10.3 20 67 46.158 10.3 20.67 46.15497 -25.485 14.07181 12.3 20.75 45.059 12.3 20.75 45.05605 -24.306 13.1122 13 2 21.64 43.96 13.2 21.64 43.95712 -22.3171 11.33045 17.2 21 41.762 172 21 41.75926 -20.7593 10.31979 18 1638 41.762 18 16.88 41.75926 -24.8793 14.82252 19 17.62 41.762 19 17.62 41.75926 -24.1393 13.95389 Sum Sqs 352.3617 Page 9

.,~ . .i Sheet 11 CT Yankee Woeker 1 Fecal data 1.UDEP 20 mu

@PI Co-60 nCi Mass Dady er.n . Type S f t = 0.05 Type S 20'c.u unwtis Ing unwits 5.9 1.79 128.48 4.47E-03 122E-02 8_00E-03 2.00E-05 2.19E-02 1.50E-04

'~5 9 0.1_05 114.51 2.30E-04 421E-04 2.42E-05 529E-08 4.42E-05 1.77EN 12.9 _ 00158 103.98 1.29E-04 ,2.39E-04 2.04E-06 1.66E-08 3.78E-06 5.71E-08

~

SEms~ ~

- _ ___1 9_108 4 83E-03' O.00E+ 00 129E-02 8 03E-03 2.01 E-05 2.19E-02 1.50E-04 i _._ _ _ __ _

Type S_ .. Point estwnate Irx)est Point est Day Actual Pred-S20 ddference wid square _ _ _ _ , _

400.4474 146.3614 5.9 1.79E+ 00 1.77E+00 2.13E-02 0.000255

_ . _ . _ _ _NN.

122.4806 M 4062 66.10879.

9.9 JOSE-01, 9.10E-02 1.40E-02 0.002151 _

12 9 1.58E-02 5.10E-02 -3.52E-02 0.024335

point est_ 326J33 153.9588 sumsg 1.67E-16 0.0261 j N_d_ L_SF _._395 692_7 148 2389.

l Unwid LS 400.3647 146.4527 i -

l CT Yankee Worker 1 Fecal data l .

4! Day PI Am-241 nCi Type S 20 mu .

Type M 20 mu Type S 20 mu unwtts Type _M_

5.9 6.32E-03 4.62E-03, 4.41 E-03 2.92E-05 2.13E-05 2.79E-05 1.94E-05 l 99 4 42E-04 _

1.67E-04 1.72E-04 7.38E-C8 2.79E-08 7.59E-08 2.95E-08 4 __. 12.9 5.55E-05 8.13E-05 8.34E-05 4.51E-09 6.61E-09 4.63E-09 6.96E-09 Sums 6.82E-03 .

4.87E-03 4.67E-03 2.93E-05 2.14E-05 2.80E-05 1.95E-05 Type S 20 Point _ estimate Type M Point est Day Actual Pred-S 20 dWierence wid squar Pred M 20 diference yid squar-1

~ ~ ~

1.37E+0a 1.43E+00 5.9 6.32E-03 6.47E-03 -1.50E-04 3.47E-06 0.006445 -125E-04 2.41E-06 l 5655+~d6 2.57E+ 00 9.9 4.42E-04' 2.34E-04 2.08E-04 0.000185 0.000251 191E-04 1.465 5

]

~6 T3E-01 T65E-Oi 12.9 5.55E-05 1.14E-04 -5.84E-05 2.99E-05 0.000122 3'54E-05 355E US

~

~ ~~

pdint est ' 1.57E+00 1.56E+00 sumsg 2.19E-04 1.84E-04

Wtd LSF 1.40E+00 1.46E+00 ' '

Undd LS~~ II37E+00 1.45 +56 --' l 4

Page 1 4

, ___z_ _ . __._ . , . , , . . , _ _ _ _ _ . . . .

lllj ll!I llljjll il 5 6 9 5 0- 0 0- 0-E E- E E _

5 6 4 6 s 9 9 9 9 i

e 1 2 6 1 w

n 5 8 9 5 u 0- 0 0 0-M E E- E E r.

e 6 5 p 1 0 1

9 7

1 y 3 8 5 3 T

5 8 9 5 0 0 0- 0- _

_ E- E- E E

. 3 9 9 4 1 7 5 1 s

e 2 2 6 2 i

w n 5 8 9 5 6 4 5 4 u 0 0 0- 0 0- 0-S E E E- 2 q 5 E E E e 0 2 6 1 s 5 1 91 5 p3 8 7 3 9 2 5 y3 7 5 3 d T i 1 1 3 1 w

' 3 4 4 0 0-M -

E E E 7 3 7 1 d 2 8 31

- 1 e r

P 7 2 2 t

e e e 0 345 g h 0 0 0- a S + P E a E E E l

0 0 t u 51 86 90 0 c 7 4 7

_ A 3 4 5 3 0 0 1 00 0 0 0- 0- 9. 9 9 t

s 0+ 0+ 0- 0 0 0

+ + + 5 9 2 M E E E E e E E E E E E 1 e 2 2 3 8 t 1 p4 7 3 6 n 2 2 5 3 4 2 y U y4 1 8 4 io 61 72 8 7 6 6 a T P 1 1 1 D

I R l~

3 # 5 3 T 0 0- 0-r e S E FE E M h

t e 2 72 7 o p6 6 8 p

1 r y4 1 8 4 I f o T T t

s 6 85 4 i

f 0- 5 0- 0-1 t

c q E 0 E E e s 6 0 6 7 r 9 0 5 8 i

d- d e 2 0 2 1

- w a

I t 34 4 a 0 0-d l S- E E 5- g a d 0 4 2 s c 3 6 2 e t e er 7 2 1 m

u i F a P s 1 345 3 n 00 1 000 0 0- 0- w 345 r s 0+ 0+ 0- 0 0 0 0 0-t e 8 E E E E e + + +

kr 3 5 8 9 9 E E E3 E E E l a E5 E E u 1 68 90 t

o 2 1 6 0 8 n 5 0 7 4 8 5 W EsPu 4 7 7 7 io 5 82,8 7 5 5 t c 7 4 7 P1 1 1 1 A

l e D"I z-ke U~

9. 9.9 S 999 nL~ 5 9 2 s F t

L 5 9 2 a u P l 1 s S e S L d 1

Y m y e t i m p n d w y T

C2D 0 a u y i n a S T ioWU p D

i

, Sheet 11 j I I i Day Pi Pu239,240 Type S Type M 20 mu Type S unwits Type M unwes 5.9 3.30E-03 4.62E-03 4.42E-03 1.52E-05 2.13E-05 1.46E-05 1.95E-05 +

9.9 1.70E-04 1.67E-04 1.72E-04 2.84E-08 2.79E-08 2.92E-08 2.96E-08 ,

12.9 0 00E+00 8.12E-05 8.34E-05 0.00E+00 6.59E-09 0.00E+00 6.96E-09  !

t t

Sums 3.47E-03 4.87E-03 4.68E-33 0.00E+00 153E-05 2.14E-05 1.46E-05 1.96E-05 .

Type S Point estimate Type M Point est l

l 7.14E-01 7.47E-01 '

1.02E+00 9.88E-01 j 000E+00 0.00E+00 i

point est 5.77E-01 5.78E-01  !

, WkiLSF 7.13E-01 7.42E-01 Un.vid LS 7:14E-01 7.47E-01 Actual Pred-S i

Day wed sq Day Actual Pred-M wkl sq 5.9 3.30E-03 329E-03 1.45E-08 5.9 3.30E-03 328E-03 1.17E-07 i 9.9 1.70E-04 1.19E-04 2.18E-05 9.9 1.7T-04 128E-04 1.40E-05 12.9 0.00E+00 5.79E-05 5

5.79E-05 12.9 0.00E+00 6.19E-05 6.19E-05 r

sumsq 7.97E-05 7.61E-05 I

! r i  !

i

\

i  !

4 6

Page 3  !

• t

Sheet 11 I I I I I l CT Yankee Wortler 1 Fecal data--dred fils for other TRU (Cm-242)

Day Pt_ Cm-244 Type S Type M Type S umwels Type M unwes 5.9 323E-03 4.61E-03 4.41E-03 1.49E-05 2.13E-05 1.42E-05 1.94E-05 9.9 3.99E-04 1.67E-04 1.72E-04 6.66E-06 2.79E-06 6.86E-06 2.96E-06 12.9 8.90E-05 8.12E-05 8.33E-05 723E-09 6.59E-09 7.41E-09 6.94E-09 2

j Soms 3.72E-03 4.86E-03 4.67E-03 1.50E-05 2.13E-05 1.43E-05 1.95E-05 Type S_ Point estimate

_ I Type M Point est 7.01E-01 7.32E-01

- 2.39E+00 2.32E+00 j 1.10E+00 1.07E+00 q poiitt est 1.40E+00 1.37E+00

Wh1LSF 7.65E-01 7.97E-01 M~tT 7.03E-01 7.35E-01 4 Day Actual Pred-S wed sq Day Adual Pred-M wed sq 5.9 3.23E-03 3.53E-03 2.52E-05 5.9 323E-03 3.51E-03 2.3E-05 9.9 3.99E-04 1.28E-04 5.75E-04 9.9 3'MBE-04 1.37E-04 5.00E-04

, 12.9 8.90E-05 6.21E-95 1.16E-05 12.9 8.90E-05 6.64E-05 7.70E-06 sumsg 6.12E-04 5.31E-04 1

I s

)

Page 4 t 3 w r --

w v v w, m. e.. _ +___,-____._m_ __.

- Sheet 12 CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecal data LUDEP 20 mu O_ay PI Co-60 nCi Mass Daty em:n. Type S Type M Type S 20 mu unwtis Type M 20 mu unweis 6.1 0.825 163.09 3.70E-03 3.64E-03 3.05E-03 137E-05 3.00E-03 132E-05 10.3 0 31.82 2.00E-04 2.75E-04 0.00E+00 4.00E-08 0.0T+00 7.56E-08 13.1 0 70.68 1.27E4 1.74 E-04 0.00E+00 1.61E-06 OLGE+00 3.03E-08 Sums 0.825 4.03E-03 4.09E-03 3.05E-03 137E-05 3.00E-03 134E-05 Type S Point estimrie Type M Point estimate 222.97", 226.6484 Day Actual Pred-S20 dWerence wed square 0 0 6.1 0.825 7.58E-01 -6.70E-02 0.005921 0 ,

0 10.3 0 4.10E-02 4.10E-02 0.040973 13.1 0 2.60E-02 2.60E-02 0.026018 point est 74.32432 point est 75.54945 Wid LSF 204.8671 WId LSF 201.7608 sum 0.0729 Unwid LS 222.0625 Unwid LS 224.8512 Day Adual Pred-M20 difference wid square 6.1 0.825 7.34E-01 -9.06E-02 0.011175 10.3 0 5.55E-02 5.55E-02 0.055484 13.1 0 3.51 E-02 3.51 E-02 0.035106 sum 0.1018 Page 1

o- .-l Sheet 72 i,

I I CT Yankee Wortter 2 Fecaldata L  :

I Day Pi Am-241 nCi Type S 20 mu Type M Type S 20 mu unwes. Type M 6.1 321E-03 3.81E-03 3.64E43 122E-05 1.45E-05 1.17E-05 1.32E-05 10._1 4.71E-05 1.52E-04 1.56E-04 7.16E-09 2.31E-08 7.35E-09 2.43E-08 13.1 4.38E-05 8.02E-05 8.20E-05 3.51 E-09 6.43E-09 3.59E-09 6.72E-09 4 Sums 3.30E-03 4.04E-03 3.88E-03 122E-05 1.45E-05 1.17E-05 1.33E-05 Type S 20 Point _estimale Type M 20 Point eshmale Day Actual Pred-S 20 difference wid square 8.43E-01 8.82E-01 6.1 321E-03 3.11E-03 -9.87E-05 3.13E-06 i 3.10E-01 3.02E-01 10.1 4.71E-05 124E-04 ' 7.70E-05 4.78E-05 j 5.46E-01 _

5.34E-01 13.1 4.38E-05 6.55E-05 2.17E-05 7.18E-0G point est 5.66E-01 point est 5.73E-01 sum 5.81E-05 Wid LSF 8.17E-01 Wid LSF 8.51E-01 l

Unwid LS 8.42E-01 Unwed LS 8.81E-01 Day Actual Pred-M 20deerence wed square i 6.1 3.21E-03 3.10E-03 -1.12E-04 4.03E-06 10.1 4.71E-05 1.33E-04 8.57E-05 5.53E-OS ,

13.1 4.38E-05 6.98E-05 2.60E-05 9.68E-06 4

I

] sum 6.90E-05  !

I F

Page 2 i i

}

I

.o o .!

Sheet 12 4

I I CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecaldata I

Day Pt - Pu-238 nCi Type S 20 mu Type M Type S 20 mu unwes Type M 6.1 1.67E-03 3.81E-03 {

3.64E-03 6.36E-061 1.45E-05 6.00E-06 1.32E-05  !

10.1 0.00E+00 1.52E-04 1.56E-04 0.00E+00 2.31E-06 0.00E+00 2.43E-06 ,

, 1 37 8.63E45 8.01E-05 820E45 6.91E-09 6.42E-09 d

7.00E-09 6.72E-09 s

Sums 1.76E-03 4.04E-03 3.88E-03 6.37E-06 1.45E-05 6.09E-06 1.33E-05 i

• Type S 20 Point estemale Type M 20 Point estmate Day Adual Pred-S 20 C.

4.38E-01

..ig, wedim l 4.59E-01 6.1 1.67E-03 1.66E-03 -1.45E-05 1.28E-07 '

b.00E+00 0.00E+00 10.1 0.00E+00 6.60E-05 6.60E-05 6 6E-05 1.06E+00 1.05E+00 13.1 8.63E ^5 3.48E-05 -5.15E-05 7.62E-05  !

i point est 5.05E-01 point est 5.04E-01 sum 4 1.42E-04 Wki LSF 4.35E-01 Wid LSF 4.53E-01 >

Unwed LS 4.38E-01 Unwid LS 4.58E-01 Day Actual Pred-M 20dElever.ce wed square I 6.1 1.67E-03 1.65E-03 -2.15E-05 2.8E-07  !

10.1 0.00E+00 7.07E-05 7.07E-05 7.07E-05 i

_ 13.1 8.63E-05 3.71E-05 -4.92E-05 6.51E-05 .

t

, sum 1.36E-04

t l i i

i 1

5 4

l k

Page 3 i f

Sheet 12 -I l

CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecaldata I I

Day PI ~ Pu-239.240 Type S 20 mu - Type M - Type E 20 mu unweis Type M 6.1 4.85E-04 3.81E-03 3.64E-03 1.85E-06 1.45E-05 1.77E-06 1.32E-05 10.1 4.00E-05 1.52E-04 1.56E-04 6.08E-09 231E-08 6.24E-09 2.43E-08 13.1 123E-05 a.01E-05 >

8.20E-05 9.85E-10 6.42E-09 1.01E-09 6.72E T 09 Soms 5.37E-04 4.04E-03 3.88E-03 1.85E-06 1.45E-05 1.77E-0G 1.33E-05 I

Type S 20 Point essemale Type M 20 Point eshmate Day Actual Pred-S 20 21 :-. :e wid square 1.27E-01 133E-01 6.1 4.85E-04 5.06E-04 2.14E-05 9.08E-07 2.63E-01 2.56E-C1 10.1 4.00E-05 2.02E-05 -1.98E-05 1.94E-05 1.54E-01 1.50E-01 13.1 123E-05 1.06E-05 -1.65E-06 2.57C47 point est 1.81E-01 point est - 1.80E-01 sum 2.06E-35 WId LSF 133E-0 Wid LSF 139E-01 Unwid LS 128E-01 Unwed LS 133E-01 Day _ Adual Pred-M 20diNorence wid square 6.1 4.85E-04 5.04E-04 1.93E-05 7.4E-O_7 10.1 4.00E-05 2.16E-05 -1.84E-05 1.56E-05 :

13.1 123E-05 1.14E-05 -9.39E-07 7.76E-06 sum 1.65E-05 1

Page 4 1

.* .l l

Sheet 12 l CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecal data l Day Pl Cm-244 Type S 20 mu Type M Type S 20 mu unweis Type M I

6.1 1.98E-03 3.80E-03 3.6d E-03 7.52E-06 1.44E-05 721E-06 122E-05 10.1 0.00E+00 1.52E-04 1.56E-04 000E+00 2.31E-08 0.00E+00 2.43E-08 13.1 1.46E-05 8.01E-05 8.19E-05 1.17E-09 6.42E-09 120E-09 6.71E-09 Sums' 1.99E-03 4.03E-03 3.88E-03 7.53E-06 1.45E-05 7.21E-06 1.33E-05 Type S 20 Point estwnate Type M 20 Point estwnate Day Actual Pred-S 20 dSerence wed square 5.21E-01 5.44E-01 6.1 1.96E-03 1.'")E-03 -1.00E-04 5.34E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 10.1 0.00E+00 7.52E-05 7.52E-05 7.52E-05 1.82E-01 1.78E-01 13.1 1.46E-05 3.96E-05 2.50E-05 1.58E point est 2.34E-01 point est 2.41E-01 sum 9.63E-05 WkiLSF 4.95E-01 Wid LSF 5.14E-01 Unwid LS 520E-01 Unwid LS 5.43E-31 Day Actual Pred-M 20dSerence wed square 6.1 1.98E-03 1.87E-03 -1.00E-04 62E-06 10.1 0.00E+00 8.02E-05 8 02E-05' 8.02E-05 13.1 1.46E-05 421E-05 2.75E-05 1.8E-Ci sum 1.04E-04 Page 5

.+ o.

Sheet 12 CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecat data LUDEP 20 mu scaled by mass I i

Day PI Co-60 nCi Mass Daily er.n Type S Type M Type S 20 mu unwtts . Type M 23 mu unwits SJ 0.825 .

163.09 0.8250 3.70E-03 3.64E-03 3.05E-03 1.37E-05 3.00E-03 1.32E-05 10.3 0 31.82 0.0000 2.00E-04 2.75E-04 0.00E+00 4.00E-08 0.00E+00 7.56E-08 13.1 0 70.68 0.0000 1.27E-04 1.74 E-04 0.00E+00 1.61 E-08 0 00E+00 3.03E-08 Sums 0.825 825E-01 4.03E-03 ^

4 09E-03 3.05E-03 1.37E-05 3.GGE-03 1.34E-05 Type S Point estimate ' _

Type M Point estimate _

222.973 _

226.6484 Day Actual Pred-S20 ddference wid square 0 0 6.1 0.825 7.58E-01 -6.70E-02 0.005921 0 0 10.3 0 4.10E-02 4.10E-02 0.040973 13.1 0 2.60E-02 2.60E-02 0.026018 point est 74.32432 point est 75.54945 WId LSF 204.8671 Wtd LSF 201.7608 sum 0.0729.

Unwid LS 222.0625 Unwid LS 224.8512 Day Actual Pred-M20 diference wid square 6.1 0.825 7.34E-01 -9.06E-02 0.011175 10.3 0 5.55E-02 5.55E-02 0.055484 13.1 0 3.51 E-02 3.51E-02 0.03510E -

sum 0.1018 Page 6

.J ..;

Sheet 12 ,

- I l  !

i CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecaldata j L

Dayp1 Am-241 n Mass- Datyeacn Type d 20 mu Type M Type S 20 mu unwes Type M f j 6.1 3.21E-03 '163.09 321E-03 ' 3.81E-03 3.64E-03 122E-05 1.45E-05 1.17E-05 1.32E-05 [

10.1 4.71E-05 31.82 2.00E-04 1.52E-04 1.56E-04 3.04E-08 2.31E-08 3.12E-08 2.43E-06  !

1 37 4.38E-05 70.68 8.37E-05 8.02E-05 620E-05 6.71E-09 6.43E-09 6.88E-09 6.72E-09 Sums 3.30E-03 3.49E-03 4.04E-03 3.88E-03 123E-05 1.45E-05 1.17E-05 1.33E-05 t Type S 20 Point eshmate Type M 20 Point estmate Day Actual Pred-S ad Z_. _- - + wed square

]

8.43E-01 8.82E-01 6.1 3.21E-03 5.01E-03 1.80E-03 0.000646'  !

j ' 1.31E+00 128E+00 10.1 2.00E-04 2.00E-04 0.00E+00 0 i

! 1.04E+00 1.02E+00 13.1 8.37E-05 1.05E-04 2.18E-05 4.5E-C6  :

, t t

l point est 1.07E+00 point est 1.06E+00 sum 6.51E-04 i Wed LSF 8.f4E-01 Wed LSF 9.01E-01 i Unwld LS 8.43E-01 Unwed LS 8.83E-01 Day Acsual Pred-M 20 diNetence wed square I 6.1 321E-03 4.88E-03 1.45E-03 0.000453  ;

10.1 2.00E-04 2.00E-04 0.00E+00 0 l 13.1 8.37E-05 1.05E-04 2.14E-05 4.35E-06  !

F l

sum 4.57E-04 I

J

.i i

1 i

• I i  !

. Page 7 i  !

~. - , _ -. ~. -. ., , , . -

Sheet 12 I I CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecaldata Day PI Pu-238 n Mass Daily ex:n Type S 20 mu Type M Type S 20 mu unwits Type M 6.1 1.67E-03 163.09 1.67E-03 3.81 E-03 3.64E-03 6.36E-06 1.45E-05 6.08E-06 1.32E-05 10j 0.00E+00 31.82 0.00E+00 1.52E-04 1.56E-04 0.00E+00 2.31E-06 0.00E+00 2.43E-08 13.1 8 63E-05 70.68 1.65E-04 8.01E-05 820E-05 1.32E-08 6.42E-09 1.35E-08 6.72E-09 Sums ._1.76E-03 1.83E-03 4.04 E-03 3.88E-03 6.35':-06 1.45E-05 6.09E-06 1.33E-05 Type _S 20 Point estimate Type M 20 Point estimate Day Actual Pred-S 20 dMerence wid square 4.38E-01 4.59E-01 6.1 1.67E-03 ' 1.73E-03 5.95E-05 2.05E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 10.1 0.00E+00 6.90E-05 6.90E-05 ' 6.9E-05 2.0FE 00 2.01 E+ 00 13.1 1.65E44 3.64E-05 -128E-04 0.000454 point est 8.32E-01 point est 8.23E-01 sum 525E-04 Wld LSF 4.54E-01 Wid LSF 4.73E-01 Unwid LS 4.38E-01 Unwid LS 4.59E-01 D_ay Actual Pred-M 20 d#erence wid square 6.1 1.67E-03 1.72E-03 522E-05 1.58E-06

_ 10.1 0.00E+00 7.38E-05 7.38E-05 7 38E-05 13.1 1.65E-04 3.88E-05 -126E-04 0.000409 sum 4.85E-04 Page 8

Sheet 12 -

-l 1-CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecaldata Day PI _ Pu-239,24 Mass Dafy em:n Type S 20 mu Type M Type S 20 mu unwes Type M 6.1 4.85E-04 163.09 4.85E-04 3.81E-03 3.64E-03 1.85E-06 1.45E-05 1.77E-06 1.32E-05 10.1 4.00E-05 31.82 1.70E-04 1.52E-04 1.56E-04 6.08E-09 2.31E-08 624E-09 2.43E-08 13.1 123E-05 70.68 2.35E-05 8.01E-05 820E-05 9.85E-10 6.42E-09 1.01E-09 6.72E-09 Sums 5.37E-04 6.78E-04 4.04E-03 3.88E-03 1.85E-06 1.45E-05 1.77E-06 1.33E-05 Type S 20 Point eshmate Type M 20 Point estiraate Day Adual P.ed-S 20 dNerence wed square ,

1.27E-01 1.33E-01 6.1 4.85E-04 6.39E-04 1.54E-04 3.72E-05 1.12E+00 1.09E+00 10.1 1.70E-04 2.55E-05 -1.44E-04 0.000815 2.93E-01 2.87E-01 13.1 2.35E-05 1.34E-05 -1.01E-05 7.52E-06 peint est 5.12f1-01 point est 5.03E-01 sum 8.60E-04 Wld LSF 1.68E-01 wid LSF 1.75E-01 Unwed LS 128E-01 Unwid LS 1.33E-O i Day Actual Pred-M 20deerence wed square 6.1 4.85E-04 6.37E-04 1.52E-04 3.61E-05 10.1 1.70E-04 2.73E-05 -1.42E-04 0.000744 13.1 2.35E-05 1.43E-05 -9.15E-06 5.84E-06 sum 7.85E-04

- n Page 9

l-l- t, Sheet 12 l.-

l -l 'l : .

3-CT Yankee Worker 2 Focaldata Dafy em:n Type S 20 mu -

Day PI .

6.1

,Cm-244 198E-03 Mass -

163.09 1.90E-03 3.80E-03 Type M -

3.64E-03 Type S 20 mu unwes 7.52E-06 1.44E-05 Type M 7.21E" .-

] -

_ '10.1 0.00E+00 31.82 0 00E+00 1.52E-04 1.56E-04 0.00E+00 2.31E-08 0.00E+wo 2.41 ,'d 13.1 1.46E-05 '70.68 2.79E-05 8.01E-D5 8.19E-05 2.23E-09 6.42E-09 228E-09 6.71E-09 I Sums. 1.99E-03 2.01E-03 4.03E-03 3.88E-03 7.53E-06 1.45E-05 7.21E-06 1.33E-05

, Type S 20 Point estwnate Type M 20 Point essemale Day- Aclual Pred-S 20 ddlerence wed square 5.21E-01 l 5.44E-01 6.1 1.98E-03 1.89E-03 -8.77E-05 4.06E-06 0.00E+00 1.00E+00 10.1 0.00E+00 7.57E-05 7.57E-05 7.57E-05 '

3.48E-01 3.40E-01 13.1 2.79E-05 3.99E-05 1.20E-05 3.61E-06 point est 2.90E-01 point est 2.95E-01 sum 8.34E-05 j VWid LSF - 4.98E-01 VWid LSF 5.18E-01 Unwid LS 5.20E-01 Urwed LS 5.43E-01 Day Actual Pred-M 2e 25- . _:- = wed squat i

6.1 1.98E-03 1.88E-03 -9.53E-05 4.82E-06 '

10.1 0.00E+00 8.00E-05 8.00E-05 8.00E-05 i 13.1 2.79E-05 424E-05 1.45E-05 4.97E-06 I

) som 9.06E-05 i

i 4

I i

i

?

4 i

i I

! i i

Page 10

, - t

Sheet 13 Dose Calculations } } }. ) l l Co-60 based on WBC da's for inhalation of 20 mu AMAD Type S per LUDEP TRU inhalation intake * 'oa'ed on ratios in alr/ debris samples Assume all TRU,'_ d Type W .

~

Worker 1:

Nuclide Type ' ' alation intake

. DCF ED ED CDE BS CDE BS DCF EDE CEDE nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv Co-60 S 6.72E+02 2.49E+04 4.69E 09 1.17E 04 1.06E 09 2.64E 05 3.38E 09 8.4E 05 U 233.234 0.00E+00 U 235 0.00E+00 U-238 0.00E+00

, Pu 238 M 1.06E+00 3.92E+01 1.43E 05 5.61E 04 4.22E 04 1.66E 02 2.39E 05 9.37E 04 Pu 239.40 M 4.30E 01 1.59E+01 1.59E 05 2.53E 04 4.74E-04 7.54E 03 2.66E 05 4.23E 04 Am 241 M 1.49E+00 5.51 E+01 1.65E 05 9.10E 04 4.89E 04 2.70E 02 2.76E 05 1.52E 03 Cm 244 M 7.97E 01 2.95E+01 8.91E 06 2.63E 04 2.52E 04 7.43E-031 1.47E 05 4.33E 04 i sum (SV) 2.10E 03 5.85E 02 3.40E 03 l sum (rem) 2.10E 01 5.85E+00 3.40E-01 #

Co 601RF (WB) at 250 days = 5.23E 03 Predicted Co-60 WBC = 3.51 nCi- should be above MDA Am 241 IRF (urine) at 250 d = 1.19E 06 Predicted Am 241 urine = 1.77E 06 nCl = 3.94E 03 dpm/d-below MDA Worker 2:

Nuclide Type inhalation intake DCF ED CDE BS CDE BS DCF EDE CEDE nCl Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv Co 60 S 1.52E+03 5.64E+04 4.69E 09 2.64E 04 1.06E 09 5.97E-05 3.38E 09 1.90E 04 U 233.234 0.00E+00 U-235 0.00E+00 U-238 0.00E+00 Pu 238 M 2.39E+00 8.85E+01 1.43E-05 1.27E 03 4.22E 04 3.73E-02 2.39E 05 2.12E-03 Pu 239,40 M 9.76E-01 3.61 E+01 1.59E 05 5.74E 04 4.74E 04 1.71E 02 2.66E-05 9.60E 04 Am 241 M 3.36E+00 1.25E+02 1.65E-05 2.05E 03 4.89E 04 6.095 02 2.76E 05 3.44E-03 Cm 244 M 1.81 E+00 6.71 E+01 8.91E 06 5.98E 04 2.52E 04 1.69E-02 1.47E 05 9.86E-04 sum (SV) 4.76E 03 1.32E 01 7.69E-03 sum (rem) 4.76E 01 1.32E+01 7.69E 01 i

Co-60 IRF (WB) at 2',0 days = 5.23E 03 Predicted Co-60 W8C = 7.97 nCl-should be above MDA Am 241 IRF (urine) at 250 d = 1.19E 06 Predicted Am 241 urine = 4.00E 06 nCi= 8.89E 03 dpm/d-below MDA E

Page1

• \

. i Sneet13 I

Dose Calculations Co-60 based on WBC data for inhalation of 20 mu AMAD Type S per LUDEP TRU inhalation intakes based on fecalIRFs from LUDEP ,

All TRU are Type M by best fit to fecal datal Worker 1:

Nuclide Type inhalation intake DCF ED ED CDE BS CDE BS DCF EDE CEDE nCl Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq SV Sv/Bq Sv Co-60 S 6.72E+02 2.49E+04 4.69E 09 1.17E 04 1.06E-09 2.64E 05 3.38E 09 8.4E 05 U 233.234 0.00E+00 U 235 0.00E+00 U 238 0.00E+00 Pu 238 M 1.64E+00 6.07E+ 01 1.43E 05 8.68E 04 4.22E 04 2.56E 02 2.39E 05 1.45E 03 Pu 239.401M 7.42E 01 2.75E+01 1.59E 05 4.37E 04 4.74E 04 1.30E 02 2.66E-05 7.30E 04 Am 241 M 1.46E+00 5.40E+01 1.65E 05 8.91 E-04 4.89E 04 2.64E 02 2.76E 05 1.49E 03 Cm 244 M 7.97E 01 2.95E+01 8.91E 06 2.63E 04 2.52E 04 7.43E 03 1.47E 05 4.33E 04 sum (Sv) 2.57E 03 7.25E 02 4.19E 03 sum (rem) 2.57E 01 7.25E+00 4.19E 01 Co-60 IRF (WB) at 250 days = 5.23E-03 Predicted Co-60 WBC = 3.51 nCi-should be above MDA Am 241 IRF (urine) at 250 d = 1.19E 06 Predkt_ed Am 241 enne = 1.74E 06 nCi = 3.86E 03 dpm/o-below MDA I

Worker 2: (fecal data scaled by mass of sample)

Nuclide Type inhalation intake DCF ED ED CDE BS CDE BS DCF EDE CEDE nCi Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv Co-60 S 1.52E+03 5.64E+04 4.69E 09 2.64E 04 1.06E 09 5.97E 05 3.38E 09 0.00019 U 233.234 0.00E+00 U 235 l 0.00E+00 U 238 I 0.00E+00 Pu 238 M 4.73E 01 1.75E+01 1.43E 05 2.50E 04 4.22E-04 7.39E 03 2.39E-05 4.18E 04 Pu-239.40 M 1.75E 01 6.48E+00 1.59E 05 1.03E 04 4.74E 04 3.07E 03 2.66E 05 1.72E 04 Am 241 M 9.01 E-01 3.33E+01 1.65E-05 5.50E 04 4.89E 04 1.63E 02 2.76E-05 9.20E 04 C m 244 M 5.16E 01 1.92E+01 8.91 E-06 1.71E 04 2.52E 04 4.83E 03 1.47E 05 2.82E-04 sum (SV) 1.34E 03 3.16E 02 1.98E 03, sum (rem) 1.34E 01 3.16E+00 1.98E 01 1

Co-60 IRF (WB) at 250 days = 5.23E 03 Predicted Co-60 WBC = 7.97 nCl-should be above MDA Am 241 IRF (unne) at 250 d = 1.19E 06 Predicted Am 241 urine = 1.07E 06 nCl = 2.38E 03 dpm/d-below MDA 4

Page 2

Sheet 14 A j Dose Calculations from best estimates of intakes I { l _ _

Co 60 based on WBC data for inhalation of 20-mu AMAD Class Y per CIND7 TRU inhalation intakes based on ratios in air / debris samples Worker 1: -

Nuclide Type Inhalation inta-e DCF CEDE CDE BS CDE BS nCl Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv '

Co-60 Y 3.41 E+02 1.26E+04 6.00E 09 7.57E 05 1.90E 09 2.40E 05 U 233.234 0.00E+00 U 235 0.00E+00 U 238 0.00E+00 Pu 238 Y 5.35E 01 1.98E+01 1.00E 04 1.98E 03 1.80E 03 3.57E 02 Pu-239.40 Y 2.18E-01 8.07E+00 1.10E 04 8.88E 04 2.10E 03 1.70E 02 Am 241 W 7.54ti 01 2.79E+01 1.10E 04 3.07E 03 2.10E 03 5.86E 02 Cm 244 W 4.06E 01 1.50E+01 7.00E-05 1.05E 03 1.20E-03 1.80E 02 sum (SV) 7.06E 03 1.29E 01 sum (rem) 7.06E 01 1.29E+01 Co-60 IRF (WB) at 250 days = 0.011 Predicted Co 60 WBC = 3.751 nCl~should be above MDA Am 241 IRF (urtne) at 250 d = 3.50E 06 Predicted Am 241 urine = 2.64E 06 nci = 5.86E 03 dpm/d-be ow MDA Worker 2:

Nuclide Type Inhalation intake DCF ED CDE BS CDE BS nCl Bq Sv/Bq Sv Sv/Bq Sv i

Co-60 Y 7.98E+02 2.95E+04 6.00E 09 1.77E 04 1.90E 09 5.61E 05 U-233.234 0.00E+00 U 235 0.00E+00 U 238 0.00E+00 Pu 238 Y 1.25E+00 4.64E+01 1.00E 04 4.64E 03 1.80E-03 8.34E 02 Pu-239,40lY 5.11E 01 1.89E+01 1.10E 04 2.06E 03 2.10E 03 3.97E 02 Am 241 W 1.76E+00 6.53E+01 1.10E 04 7.18E 03 2.10E-03 1.37E 01 Cm 244 W 9.50E 01 3 $1E+01 7.00E 05 2.46E 03 1.20E 03 4.22E 02 sum (SV) 1.65E-02 3.02E 01 sum (rem) 1.65E+00 3.02E+01 Cc.60 IRF (WB) at 250 days = 0.011 Predicted Co-60 WBC = 8.778 nCi-should be above MDA

3.50E 06 Am 241 IRF (urine) at 250 d = ,,_

l Predicted Am 241 urine = 6.17E 06 nCl = 1.37E 02 dpm/d-rloht around MDA Page1

Sheet 15 Co.T+&rtson of Dose Estimates from different models:l l Co40 from fit to WBC data; TRU from activity ratio in a6rldebrts samples

) All TRU are taken as Class W or Type M L

Worker 1 CEDE, rom CDE 88, rom Uconsee's assessment 0.44 5.40 clCRP 30 models)

Nitzed inhale / ingest 0.44 7.74

(ICRP 30 models)

( 20-micron inhale 0.71 12.90 l (ICRP 30 f ?r intake estimate and dose calculations) 20 micron Inhale 1 0.34l 5.88 (ICRP46 for intake estimate; IC RP40 for dose calculations, with ICRP 30 weighting factors)

I CED, tem CDE 88, tem 20-micron inhale 0.21 8.8A _ __

(ICRP 66 for intake estimate: ICRP40 for dose calculations)

I Worker 2 CEDE, rom CDE SS, rem Licensee's assassment 0.25 3.00 (ICRP 30 models)

Mixed inhale / ingest 0.21 3.57 (ICRP 30 models)-

20 micron inhale 1.65 30.20 (ICRP 30 for intake estimate and dose calculations) 20 micron inhale - I- l 0.77l ii20 (ICRP46 for intak s estimate; ICRP40 for dose calculations, with ICRP 30 weighting factors)

I CEO, tem CDE BS, tem -

20 micron inhale - 0.48 13.20 (ICRP46 for intake estimate; ICRP40 for dose calculations)

Page1

Fig.1: CT Yankee Worker 1 WBC Data 1000 .

-.- actual nCi -

Class Y Class W 60Co N Ingestion 10  %

. i N_ -.

~

0 5 10 15 sisi" Days post intake

Fig. 2: CT Yankee Worker 1 WBC Data 35 '_

30 >

1 25 - - Chi sq V

20

%s 15 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

80 85 90 95 100

,,,,,,  % Ingestion ICRP-30 model,1 mu

Fig. 3: CT Yankee Worker 1 WBC Data 1000 _

100 .

~ ~

nCi  ; - - Actual

- - Fit 91% Ing+9% Y 60C0 x '

~

10 _

e 6

4 0 5 10 15 8/5/97 Days post intake ICRP-30 model, I mu

i Fig. 4: CT Yankee Worker 2 WBC Data 10000 _

1000 "-

nCi

~~~ "*'

60C0 -*- C las s Y 100 _

= = ^ ^

E Class W

{ -+-inges tion N-w

~ ~

=^

10 _

q . . .

0 5 10 15 20 3,,,,,

Days post intake ICRP-30 models,1 mu c-

Fig. 5: CT Yankee Worker 2 WBC Data 300 r 250 200 w 'I

+ Chi sq.

e 150 6

6 100 ' ' ' ' '

85 90 95 100

% Ingestion ICRP-30 models,1 mu

Fig. 6: CT Yankee Worker 2 WBC Data 1000 7

100 _

~

nCi -.- Actual

- - -+- Fit 97% ing + 3% Y 60C0

~

I I~

M

=

10 g 6

e 4

0 5 10 15 20 Days post intake ICRP-30 models,1 mu g,,,,

Fig. 7: CT Yankee Worker 1 Fecal Co-60 Data 10 1

- - actual nCi { Class Y

--Class W

'N.

Ingest. ion f ,

0.01 0 5 10 -

15 8/5/97 Days post intake ICRP-30 models,1 mu l

• b i l

Fig. 8: CT Yankee Worker 1 Fecal Am-241 Data 1.00E-02  :

I

~

\

1.00E-03

~

\ x, l nCi  ! + Actual

-+- Class Y 1.00E-04 -

x E

N --- Class W

-*- Ingest i .00E-05  :

1.00E-06 ' '

0 5 10 15 g,,,,,

Days post intake ICRP-30 models,1 mu

Fig. 9: CT Yankee Worker 2 Fecal Co-60 Data 1 _

~

nCi

- - actual

-*- Class Y 0.1 3 -x . --Class W

-*-ingestion 0.01 ' ' ' '

'i 0 5 10 15 8 "

Days post intake ICRP-30 models,1 mu l

l

. . . .=: .

Fig.10: CT Yankee Worker 2 scaled fecal Am-241 Data ,

1.00E-02  :

~

9 1.00E-03 _

+ Actual nCi  :

Class Y w

1.00E-04 _

--- Class W

- -*- Ingest

~

1.00E-05  :

1.00E-06 5 10 15 0

Days post intake ICRP-30 models,1 mu

.. . J

l Fig.11: CT Yankee Worker 1 -WBC. Chi sq. vs. particle size l

150

l

~

125 _

~

100  :

T 75 4- CINDY

--LUDEP 50 _

_7 25 v / )

~

O O 5 10 15 20 25 30 Particle size, microns 8/5/97

Fig.12: CT Yankee Worker 2 WBC Chi sq. vs. particle size 900

- l 750

~

1 600 450 -.- CIN DY

-- LUDEP 300

. ...iie i.I i .... .t . iis s e a e J l 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 8/5/97 Particle size, microns

Fig.13: CT Yankee Worker 1 WBC via LUDEP 1000 100 y

i nCi  :

_,_ Actual 60C0 _

Fit 20 mu inhal.

10 _

4 e

0 5 10 ~

15 Time post intake, days 8/5/97 ICRP-66 model

Fig.14: CT Yankee Worker 2 WBC via LUDEP 1000  :

m 100 -

nCi  !

60Co -

- -: e= F.m 10

--- Actual

--- Fit 20 mu inhal.

~

q ,

0 5 10 15 20 3,,,, ,

Time post intake, days ICRP-66 model 9

Fig.15: Worker 1: comparison ofintake models 1000 _

100

• nCi  ! -*- Actual

--- Fit 91% Ing+9% Y

• Co -

-*- Fit 20 mu inhal.

%.bs -

4 10 m

1 0 5 10 15 Time post intake, days 8/5/97 4

Fig.16: Worker 2: comparison ofintake models 1000 7

~

l 100 -

~

nCi 60Co

_===f 5 10 -

-=- Actual

~

_ Fit 97% ing + 3% Y Fit 20 mu inhal. _

1 0 5 10 15 20 8/5/97 Time post intake, days

Fig.17: CT Yankee Worker 1 Fecal Co-60 Data LUDEP 10 1

1 _

l

-*- actual 1

nCi 1 mu Class Y

-+-20 mu Type S 0.1 .

e 0.01 ' ' ' ' ' '

0 5 10 15 Days post intake

5 r- . .:

l 1

Fig.18: CT Yankee Worker 1 Fecal Am-241 Data 1.00E-02  :

1.00E-03 _

\ -

nCi -

-=- Actual 1.00E-04 _

-.-Class Y 1 mu  !

-*-Type M 20 mu 1.00E-05  :

1.00E-06 0 5 - 10 15 Days post intake

v. ..

Fig.19: CT Yankee Worhr 2 Fecal Co-60 Data 1 .

l' 4

nCi l

- - actual  ;

l

\

0.1 _

Class Y 1 mu

~

Type S 20 mu e

0.01 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

0 5 10 -

16 Days post intake l

l

_ __ . ~.

T. . . .

Fig. 20: CT Yankee Worker 2 scaled fecal Am-241 data 1.00E-02  :

i 1.00E-03 _

nCi -

--- Actual 1.00E-04 ; w Class.Y 1 mu

-*-Type M 20 mu 1.00E-05  :

4 1.00E-06 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

0 5 10 15 ,

Days post intake

- *