ML20078A157

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:37, 25 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Annual Lake Norman Environ Summary Rept for 1993
ML20078A157
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/18/1995
From: Mcmeekin T
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20078A161 List:
References
NUDOCS 9501240298
Download: ML20078A157 (1)


Text

p .

11:.

I.

' DukeIbwCompany .

McGuire Nuclear Generation Depanment V l T. C McMam

^ Vicehesident r 12700Hagers FenyRoad(MG01YP) (704)8754800

'- Huntenodle,NC28078M (104)8754809 Fax DUKEPOWER January 18, 1995 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ,

Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 i

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370 Pursuant to McGuire Technical Specifications, Appendix B, Section 3.2,.

please find attached the annual Lake Norman Environmental Summary Report for 1993 as required by NPDES permit NC0024392.

Questions concerning this report should be directed to Kay Crane, McGuire Regulatory Compliance at (704) 875-4306.

Very truly yourr, f(Dud '

T. C. McMeekin, Vice President McGuire Nuclear Station cc 'Mr. Victor Nerses, Project Manager Office of Nuclear' Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

-Region II 101 Marietta Street - Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. George Maxwell Senior Resident Inspector g

McGuire Nuclear Station e

DA {% f- f b , '

A *. b .

9501240298 950118 PDR ADOCK 05000369 /

P PDR pQf 1

amo on =v*o m- .)

(

i LAKE NORMAN: 1993

SUMMARY

l MAINTENANCE MONITORING PROGRAM McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION: NPDES No. NC0024392 1

r x l m'u"mme"r" M

l

= l e

~

O ,

l l

DUKE POWER COMPANY 13339 IIAGERS FERRY ROAD HUNTERSVILLE, NORTII CAROLINA 28078 DECEMBER 1994 e

t TABLE OF CONTENTS i Page EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

i LIST OF TABLES v l LIST OF FIGURES vi l I

CHAPTER 1: McGUIRE OPERATIONAL DATA 1-1 Introduction 1-1 Operational data for 1993 1-1 Thermal Modeling 1-1 j Results and Discussion 1-2 Summary 1-4 Literature Cited 1-5 CHAPTER 2: WATER CHEMISTRY 2-1  ;

Introduction 2-1  !

Methods and Materials 2-1 Results and Discussion 2-2 i Future Water Chemistry Studies 2-8  !

Summary 2-9 Literature Cited 2-9 (qj CHAPTER 3: PHYTOPLANKTON Introduction 3-1 3-1 Methods and Materials 3-1 Results and Discussion 3-2

)

Future Phytoplankton Studies 3-6 Summary 3-6 Literature Cited 3-7 CHAPTER 4: ZOOPLANKTON 4-1 Introduction 4-1 Methods and Materials 4-1 Results and Discussion 4-2 Future Zooplankton Studies 4-5 Summary 4-5 Literature Cited 4-6 CHAPTER 5: FISHERIES 5-1 Introduction 5-1 Methods and Materials 5-2 Results and Discussion 5-2 Future Fisheries Studies 5-3 Literature Cited 5-3 APPENDIX. Progress report on summer habitat selection of striped bass in Lake Norman (Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Project F23-17) A-1

CN Q EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

OPERATIONAL DATA Both units were operational during July, August, and September, when conservation of cool water and discharge temperatures are most critical. The average monthly discharge temperature was below the permit limit for all months and use of low level intake water was not necessary for compliance with the thermal limit for McGuire Nuclear Station (MNS). l This helped to conserve habitat for cool water fish in Lake Norman.

THERMAL MODELING As in the previously submitted 316(a) demonstration report for MNS in 1985, the meteorology for 1953 still provides a worst case scenario for MNS and Marshall Steam Station (MSS) discharge temperatures. The predicted lake surface area affected by the thermal plumes from both MNS and MSS (at 100% load June-August,90% load the rest of the year) are less than the limit established by these stations' NPDES permits (i.e., 3500 acres). This is true for both the 90*F (32.2*C) isotherm and the 5 F (2.8 C) above i background temperature isotherm.

)

1 Use of the Low Level Intake (LLI) pumps has not been necessary to maintain compliance l with the permitted thermal limits. In the event that LLI pumps have to be used, the predicted thermal profiles indicate that the primary temperature change would occur in the hypolimnion only during August, when these waters are usually anoxic and consequently have very low fish densities. l l

WATER CHEMISTRY DATA Temporal and spatial trends in water temperatur and DO data colic,' . monthly in 1993 were similar to those observed historically. Reservoir-wide isotherm and isopleth information for 1993, coupled with heat content and hypolimnetic oxygen data, illustrated that Lake Norman exhibited thermal and oxygen dynamics characteristic of historic i

I j

L  ;

e ,

a f

I conditions and similar to other Southeastern reservoirs of comparable size, depth, flow '

conditions, and trophic status.

I Availability of suitable pelagic habitat for adult striped bass in Lake Norman in 1993 was generally similar to historic conditions. Reservoir-wide habitat elimination was observed to .

persist for approximately 2 months in the 1993 summer. This is somewhat longer than the a- duration of complete habitat elimination observed in the summer of 1992, but similar to ,

earlier summers.

All chemical parameters measured in 1993 were within the concentration ranges previously reported for the lake during both MNS preoperational and operational years.

Pj D LOPLANKTON DATA Chlorophyll a concentrations at all locations during 1993 were within historical ranges and in the mesotrophic range. They were generally higher than those observed during 1987 through j 1990 but were similar to those observed in 1991 and 1992.

' atal phytoplankton densities and biovolumes remained similar to those observed in previous ,

)

years. Phytoplankton taxonomic composition during 1993 was similar to that observed  ;

during the same months of 1992. Diatoms, green algae and cryptophytes were the most numerically abundant classes of algae observed. Diatoms and cryptophytes generally  !

dominated the phytoplankton biovolumes in all months except August when the l phytoplankton community consisted of a diverse assemblage dominated by small green  ;

algae. Dinoflagellates were sporadically dominant in terms of biovolume at some locations during all months except November. Blue-green algae were never a dominant at any location  ;

or time in 1993.  :

I ZOOPLANKTON DATA Total zooplankton standing crops were generally highest in May and lowest in November  :

during 1993. Zooplankton densities, in general, were slightly higher in eplimnetic samples ,

thrai in whole column samples. Total zooplankton densities at Mixing Zone locr.tions were not significantly different from background locations during any quarter in 1993. The typical i

ii l

l l

(O)- trend of increasing zooplankton densities from downlake to uptake was observed only in November in 1993. The range of total zooplankton densities observed during 1993 was

. similar to the ranges observed since 1987.  !

I F

i

. Overall, rotifers dominated zooplankton standing crops in 1993, as they did in 1992, I followed closely in importance by copepods. Cladocerans were dominant numerically on only one occasion in 1993. Major rotifer taxa observed in 1993 were Keratella, Polyarthra l t

and Synchacta. Copepod populations were dominated by immature forms (nauplii and  !

cyclopoid copepodids). As in previous years, Bosmina was the most abundant cladoceran ,

taxa observed at all locations. Overall, zooplankton taxonomic composition in 1993 was l similar to that observed in previous years. f I

FISHERIES DATA j Hydroacoustic density estimates of limnetic fish in lower Lake Norman were similar to'  ;

ranges observed in other areas of the reservoir. Densities were lower in the heated water i

( plume on August 4,1993, than in the surrounding areas,. A clumped distribution pattern is evident, with densities ranging from less than 10,000 to greater than 90,000/ha in the MNS l.

mixing zone and in areas of the reservoir with ambient water temperatures. Surface water  :

temperatures in the discharge area during August were 35*C. This is higher than the preferred temperatures of threadfin shad, the predominant species in the limnetic area of the reservoir (Duke Power Company 1993).  ;

r Nearly all (99.6%) of the fish collected in the purse seine in August were threadfin shad.

The only other species sampled with the purse seine in lower Lake Norman was black crappie.

Dead and dying striped bass were observed during the last 2 weeks in July 1993 in the MNS mixing zone. On July 23, fourteen dead striped bass were count'ed in the main channel from i the dam to Marker 7, approxirnately 6 miles above the dam and 2 miles above the confluence  ;

of Davidson Creek and the main channel. On July 30, eleven dead striped bass were counted  :

from the dam to Marker IA, approximately 1.5 mi'es above the dam. Only two of the 25 dead striped bass observed were larger than 5 pounds. Anglers fishing the area for striped  !

bass were catching large numbers of fish less than the 20 inch size limit and retuming them [

O kkk i

I

i

.i

?

to the lake. This likely contributed to the large number of dead small fish observed. Striped l f

bass less than 5 pounds have not been reported in the literature as stressed by high summer ,

water temperatures; however, recent research in Tennessee has shown angling mortalities of ,

greater than 60% for striped bass caught in the summer (Phil Bettoli, personal  !

conununication). l r

9 b

i i

I l

l

)

l l

)

r l

I f

4

, i iv  ;

i 3

9 l

l I i

I

  • \

i i

O LIST OF TABLES Page

~

Table 1-1 McGuire Nuclear Station (MNS) 1991 capacity factors 1-6 ,

Table 1-2 Predicted MNS discharge temperatures 1-7 l Table 1-3 MNS and Marshall Steam Station (MSS) operating conditions 1-8 l Table 1-4 Hydrological and Meteorological parameters for 1953 1-8

! Table 1-5 90 F(32.2*C) isotherms for MNS and MSS 1-9 ,

Table 1-6 ' 5 F(2.8*C) above background isotherms for MNS and MSS 1-9 Table 2-1 Water chemistry monitoring program schedule 2-12 Table 2-2 Water chemistry methods and detection limits 2-13 Table 2-3 Heat content calculations for Lake Norman in 1993 2-14 Table 2-4 Comparison of Lake Norman with TVA reservoirs 2-15  ;

Table 2-5 Water chemistry data for 1991 for Lake Norman 2-16 Table 3-1 Mean chlorophyll a concentrations in Lake Nonnan 3-9 i Table 3-2 Duncan's multiple range test for Chlorophyll a 3-10 Table 3-3 Total phytoplankton densities from Lake Norman 3-11 Table 3-4 Duncan's multiple range test for phytoplankton densities 3-12 ]

Table 3-5 Duncan's multiple range test for seston in Lake Norman 3-13 Table 4-1 Total zooplankton densities and composition 4-7

) Table 4-2 Duncan's multiple range test for zooplankton densities 4-9 Table 4-3 Zooplankton taxa identified in Lake Norman 1993 4-10 l

l l

l V

LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1-1 Predicted average temperature profiles for Lake Norman 1-10 Figure 2-1 Map of sampling locations on Lake Norman 2-19 Figure 2-2 Monthly precipitation near McGuire Nuclear Station 2-20 Figure 2-3 Monthly mean temperature profiles in background zone 2-21 Figure 2-4 Monthly mean temperature profiles in mixing zone 2-23 Figure 2-5 Monthly temperature and dissolved oxygen data 2-25 Figure 2-6 Monthly mean dissolved oxygen profiles mixing zone 2-26 Figure 2-7 Monthly mean dissolved oxygen in background zone 2-28 Figure 2-8 Monthly isotherms for Lake Norman 2-30 Figure 2-9 Monthly dissolved oxygen isopleths for Lake Norman 2-33 Figure 2-10 Striped bass habitat in Lake Norman 2-36 Figure 3-1 Chlorophyll a measurements of Lake Norman 3-14 Figure 3-2 Phytoplankton chlorophyll a euphotic zone 3-15 Figure 3-3 Total phytoplankton densities and biovolumes 3-16 Figure 3-4 Class composition in euphotic zone 3-17 Figure 4-1 Zooplankton density by sample location in Lake Norman 4-11 Figure 4-2 Lake Norman zooplankton densities among years 4-12 i 4-13 Figure 4-3 Lake Norman zooplankton composition in 1993 Figure 4-4 Lake Norman zooplankton density by group 4-14 Figure 5-1 Fish densities in lower Lake Norman August 4,1993 5-4 vi

I j

l

Lp)-

CHAPTER 1 McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION OPERATIONAL DATA INTRODUCTION In addition to operational data for 1993, results of thermal modeling runs ns requested per the NPDES permit are included in this years annual environmental summary report. This  ;

modeling was done to assess the impact of 100% load factor during the months of June, July, and August and 90% the remainder of the year.

OPERATIONAL DATA FOR 1993 Both units were operational during July, August, and September, when conservation of cool water and discharge temperatures are most critical (Table 1-1). During these months th:

[3 thermal limit for MNS increases from a monthly average of 95 F to 99 F. The average  !

monthly discharge temperature was 94.1 F (34.5 C) for July,91.9 F (33.3 C) for August, and 83.8 F (28.8 C) for September 1993. Use oflow level intake water was not necessary for compliance with the thermal limit for MNS. This helped to conserve habitat for cool water fish in Lake Norman. The volume of cool water in Lake Norman is tracked throughout the year to ensure that an adequate volume is available to comply with both the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Technical Specification requirements and the NPDES monthly i

discharge water temperature limit. ,

THERMAL MODELING RESULTS Based on a request made by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Management (NCDEM), Duke Power has completed additional modeling analyses of the thermal regime in Lake Norman resulting from operations at McGuire Nuclear Station (MNS) and Marshall i

Steam Station (MSS). Specifically, NCDEM requested that Duke "remodel and assess the impact of 100% load factor during the months of June-August and 90% for the remainder of 3 the year."

1-l

O The model set-up for this additional analysis is basically the same as it was for the June 1985 316(a) demonstration report (Duke Power Company 1985). Please refer to that report for a description of the model, the assumptions made, validation of the model, and' predictive results assuming a year-round 90% load factor for both MNS and MSS.

Meteorology

. In order to demonstrate worst case conditions, it was necessary to determine which year produced meteorological conditions such that maximum discharge temperatures at MNS and MSS would result. Meteorological records from the Charlotte Airport (approximately 17 miles from MNS and 25 miles from MSS) were obtained for years 1951 through 1993. By running this entire period of meteorological data through the thennal model (set in predictive

) mode),1953 produced the highest June-August discharge temperatures, as shown in Table 1-

2. (Note that this was also the case for the 316(a) demonstration report submitted in 1985.)

I Therefore,1953 meteorological data was used to obtain the model results discussed in the following section.

Results and Disemion For the 1953 predictive model run, the load (or capacity) factor was 100% for June-August and 90% the remainder of the year. Tables 1-3 through 1-6 provide the model results for both MNS and MSS for the June-August period when both stations were operating at 100%.

Note that results for the months having a capacity factor of 90% are given in the 316(a) demonstration report (Duke Power Company 1985).

Table 1-3 provides Condenser Cooling Water (CCW) data for both MNS and MSS.

Although this data is fairly self-explanatory, the discharge temperature and CCW usage at 1-2

O MNS warrant further discussion. The thermal model (when run in a predictive mode) will not let monthly average discharge temperatures at MNS exceed 37.2*C (99.0*F). To accomplish this, the Low Level Intake pumps (LLI) at MNS are judiciously used to bring cool water from the bottom of Lake Norman to the surface so it can be mixed with the warmer water brought in by the Upper Level Intake pumps (ULI) located near the surface of Lake Norman. In doing this, the overall temperature of the intake water at MNS is reduced enough to keep the station's discharge temperature in compliance with its 37.2*C (99.0*F) monthly average discharge limit during the summer months. Refer to the MNS 316(a) demonstration report (Duke Power Company 1985) for a description and drawings of the LLI and ULI pumping structures.

t For the June-August period, LLI water requirements for the 1953 predictive run were 0 cfs,

- 108 cfs, and 173 cfs, respectively (Table 1-3). This amount of flow is very small when compared to the overall station CCW requirements of 4580 cfs. Thus, the majority of CCW water used for the 1953 worst case scenario comes from the surface waters of Lake Norman

) and only a small amount from the cooler bottom layers. This is reflected in the predicted thermal profiles for June, July, and August (Figure 1-1). For the vast majority of years, the model predicts that the LLI pumps will not have to operate to comply with the stations NPDES discharge temperature limit, even with capacity factors of 100% during the summer months. This has also been the experience of station personnel since the 37.2*C (99.0*F) monthly average discharge limit was granted. Use of the LLI pumps has not been necessary to maintain compliance with the permitted thermal limits. In the event that LLI pumps have to be used, the predicted thermal profiles indicate that the primary temperature change would occur in the hypolimnion during only August, when these waters are usually anoxic and ,

consequently have very low fish densities (See Chapters 2 and 5)  ;

i O 1-3 f

--,--r- , , -- _ , ,- _-

m 5

i e

i Table 1-4 provides the hydrological and meteorological parameters used for the 1953 predictive model run. Note that the river flow values are simulated Cowans Ford Ilydro  !

discharge flow rates. Also, the meteorological data was obtained from the Churlotte Airport.

l The lake surface area and shore-line affected by the 90'F (32.2*C) isotherm resulting from predicted thermal discharges from MNS and MSS are given in Table 1-5. The largest 90 F (32.2*C) isotherm from MNS ~. curred during July (1897 acres, or approximately 7% of  :

l Lake Norman's total surfere area). For MSS, the largest 90'F (32.2*C) isotherm occurred j during August (336 acres, or approximately 1% of Lake Norman's total surface area). Note that neither of these isotherm acreages are greater than the limits established in these stations' ;

NPDES permits (i.e., 3500 acres). Maximum shore-line aff ,ted by the 90*F (32.2 C) isotherm is 25 km (16 mi), or 3% of the total shore-line for MNS and 3 km (2 mi), or approximately 0.05% of the total shore-line for MSS. l l

The lake surface area and shore-line affected by the 5'F (2.8'C) above background temperature isotherm resulting from predicted thermal discharges from MNS and MSS are given in Table 1-6. The largest area affected by MNS occurred during August (2100 acres, or approximately 7% of Lake Norman's total surface area). For MSS, the largest area also )

i occurred during August (579 acres, or approximately 2% of Lake Norman's total surface area). Note that neither of these isotherm acreages are greater than the limits established in these stations' NPDES permits (i.e.,3500 acres). Maximum shore-line affected by the 5'F (2.8'C) above background isotherm is 27 km (17 mi),or 3% of the total shore-line for MNS and 9 km (6 mi), or approximately 1% of the total shore-line for MSS.

O l-4

r .,

./

SUMMARY

l. The meteorology for 1953 still provides a worst case scenario for MNS and MSS discharge temperaturcs. Note that 1953 meteorological data was also used to. predict worst case conditions in the 1985 MNS 316(a) demonstration report.
2. Use of the LLI pumps have not been necessary to maintain compliance with the current permitted thermal limits. In the event that LLI pumps has to be used, the predicted thermal profiles indicate that the primary temperature change would occur in the hypolimnion only during August, when these waters are usually anoxic and consequently i

have very low fish densities.

3. The predicted lake surface area affected by the thermal plumes from both MNS and MSS (at 100% load June-August, 90% load the rest of the year) are less than the limit established by these stations' NPDES permits (i.e.,3500 acres). This is true for both the O) y 90*F (32.2*C) isotherm and the 5'F (2.8"C) above background temperature isotherm.

2 LITERATURE CITED Duke Power Company.1985. McGuire Nuclear Station,316(a) Demonstration. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC. .

e a

t E

k t

1-5 i

1 l

jr3 u Table 1-1. Average monthly capacity factors (%) calculated from daily unit capacity factors [ Net Generation (Mwe per unit day) x 100 / 24 h l per day x 1129 mw per unit] and monthly average discharge water l temperatures for McGuire Nuclear Station during 1993 l CAPACITY FACTOR (%) TEMPERATURE Month Unit 1 Unit 2 Station Monthly Average Average Average Average OF OC January 101.0 101.9 101.4 67.0 19.4 February 101.90 89.0 95.4 65.1 18.4 ,

March 35.2 94.9 65.1 61.3 16.3 April 0 101.8 50.7 69.3 20.7 May 0 98.1 48.7 75.0 23.9 June 38.2 78.0 58.1 84.0 28.9 July 96.6 0 47.9 94.1 34.5 August 65.2 0 32.0 91.9 33.3 September 0 34.2 16.5 83.8 28.8 October 40.3 49.2 44.8 76.8 24.9 d November 95.3 100.1 97.7 91.7 75.5 69.6 24.2 20.9 December 100.6 82.8

)

O l-6

t Table 1-2: Predicted MNS discharge temperatures (MNS and MSS capacity factors = 100% June, July,

( and August; 90% the remainder of the year).

JUN-AUG YR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AVO 1951 72.5 71.5 74.8 77.4 84.1 91.2 98.0 99.0 94.1 86.9 77.3 73.7 96.1 i 1952 73.9 74.5 74.9 77.7 83.7 96.0 99.0 98.7 92.1 84.2 76.7 74.4 97.9 1953 73.7 74.2 74.9 78.7 86.7 97.0 98.9 98.6 93.4 36.1 7f ! 73.5 98.2 1954 71.1 73.9 75.7 79.3 82.7 90.9 98.1 99.0 94.1 86.5 75.9 71.4 96.0 1955 71.2 71.2 75.1 30.1 F5.8 91.3 983 97.8 92.0 84.4 76.4 71.7 95.8 1956 683 74.4 74.9 77.1 84.0 91.7 98.0 983 91.1 82.2 R4 74.8 96.0 j 1957 73.2 74.4 74.8 77.9 85.1 92.9 983 96.5 92.3 80.9 73.6 74.7 95.9 1958 68.3 69.2 74.1 77.1 83.2 92.6 97.5- 98.5 91.6 83.5 77.2 713 963 1959 69.7 73 3 74.3 78.9 86.0 92.4 963 98.5 91.5 85.9 76.8 73.6 95.7 1960 72.2 71.6 68.6 77.9 82.6 93.0 973 96.8 91.8 85.5 75.7 71.9 95.7 1961 70.2 70.6 73.1 75.2 81.8 90.8 96.1 96.5 92.2 843 79.2 74.3 94.5 1%2 70.2 72.6 74.3 77.5 86.7 93.4 95.7 95.3 91.2 84.8 74.8 69.7 94.8 1%3 68.6 67.9 74.1 30.4 83.7 91.2 95.0 97.1 90.6 83.7 76.7 70.8 94.4 1964 69.0 70.0 73 3 77.8 84.1 92.7 953 95.4 90.5 81.5 75.0 74.8 94.5 1965 72.2 72.6 73.7 78.7 87.7 92.8 96.0 %.8 92.5 83.2 76.4 74.2 95.2 1966 70.1 69.8 74.0 77.1 84.0 91.4 97.1 96.0 91.6 83.1 RO 72.7 94.8 1967 70.7 71.0 74.3 80.4 81.5 89.5 953 96.0 88.8 83.1 76.2 74.8 93.6 79.4 97.2 98.5 90.8 84.8 76.8 71.9 95.5 l 1968 683 70.0 73.5 83.5 90.9 1969 68.7 713 72.1 79.0 84.6 92.7 98.5 96.4 903 83.6 76.0 70.4 95.9 1970 67.0 713 75.2 78.2 85.5 91.8 95.8 95.6 93.1 84 3 77.4 74.4 94.4 1971 69.8 68.9 74.5 77.4 82.7 91.4 953 95.1 92.4 36.1 78.8 74.7 94.1 1972 74.5 70.1 75.5 E6 82.1 883 94.8 95.1 90.5 81.5 R0 73.6 92.7 h

1973 70.7 69.4 74.6 76.4 81.3 92.0 96.6 963 92.9 84.9 75.9 72.8 95.0 1974 74.8 74.6 75.5 77.8 83.7 90.9 94.5 94.5 89.0 81.0 76.9 71.2 933 1

1975 73.2 74.7 74.5 77.1 85.9 92,1 94.6 98.1 92.2 84.9 79.0 73.6 94.9 I

1976 68.9 74.0 75.4 78.7 82.3 89.1 94.7 94.7 88.9 82.6 74.7 70.8 92.8 1977 65.0 683 75.5 79.5 83.8 91.8 98.5 97.4 93.9 82.6 77.3 73.2 95.9 l 1978 68.1 66.8 72.2 79.6 82.1 94.0 98.2 98.9 95.0 83.1 79.0 74.2 97.0 1979 68.2 67.0 75.0 79.9 843 90.6 94.4 96.9 91.2 82.1 77.5 73.8 94.0  ;

1980 70.7 69.4 73.1 78.9 82.9 92.1 973 98.5 95.5 83.4 76.4 72.5 96.2 1981 66.6 70.6 74.7 79.2 82.1 94.2 97.0 94.9 90.9 81.4 75.7 70.9 95.4 1982 67.2 72.4 74.7 77.4 843 93.6 98.8 98.2 903 83.9 76.7 743 963-1983 693 72.0 75.2 76.5 32.3 89.4 96.8 98.1 93.6 83.0 76.0 72.9 94.8 1984 67.4 72.4 73.6 76.1 81.7 90.6 95.4 95.9 90.5 84 3 78.3 74.8 94.0 1985 69.6 69.0 75.2 78.8 85.6 93.3 96.6 963 92.0 85.7 79.8 73.7 95.4 l 1986 63.3 71.8 74.2 79.8 84.9 94.6 99.0 98.0 91.7 87.0 78.4 74.6 97.2 1987 70.4 70.9 74.0 77.2 83.0 92.6 98.9 98.9 93.8 81.8 76.0 74.1 96.8 1988 67.7 4 71.5 75.2 79.4 83.9 913 963 98.7 903 81.8 75.2 733 95.4 )

1989 73.7 74.2 74.9 78.0 823 92.8 96.7 96.1 91.6 83.5 78.1 69.6 93.2 1990 71.9 75.9 73.2 77.8 84.9 92.7 97.7 98.0 94.2 86.2 77.7 75.0  %.1 l iP9: 73.5 R8 76.4 30.i 85.6 92.8 983 97.i 93.6 84.3 76.6 74.7 96.i  !

1992 72.1 74.1 76.1 78.7 80.4 86.9 97.0 95.4 92.8 81.9 77.6 73.4 93.1 l 1993 73.0 71.9 73.1 77.0 82.5 93.0 99.0 98.2 94.7 83 3 763 73.1  %.7 l 1

I l-7 i

Table 1-3: MNS and MSS Operating Conditions for 1953 Predictive Run.

McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION MARSHALL STEAM STATION Total LLI CCW Capacit Intake Discharge CCW- CCW Capacity Intake Discharge MO/YR CCW CCW AT y Factor Temp Temp Flow AT Factor Temp Temp efs efs *C cF) (%) *C PF) *C OF) cms (cfs) *C PF) (%) *C PF) *C PF)

JunI 1953 4580 0 9.0 (16.2) 100 27.0 (80.6) 36.0 (96.8) 51 (1784) 11.2 (20.1) 100 17.7 (63.9) 28.9 (84.0)

Jul/1953 4580- 108 9.1 (16.3) 100 28.2 (82.7) 37.2 (99.0) 59 (2068) 9.6 (17.3) 100 22.9 (73.3) 32.6 (90.6)

Aug/1953 4580 173 9.1 (16.4) 100 27.8 (82.1) 36.9 (98.5) 64 (2264) 8.8 (15.81 100 26.4 U9.6) 35.2 (95.4)

Table 1-4: Hydrological and Meteorological Parameters for 1953 Predictive Run.

1 i

HYDROLOGICAL METEOROLOGICAL Background Water Surface River Dry Dew Cloud Solar Wind Speed at

f. MO/YR Temp Elevation Flow Bulb Point Cover Radiation height = 26 m

'C PF) m (ft) ems (cfs) *C PF) *C PF) (%) LY/ Day m/s (mph)

Jun /1953 28.2 (82.8) 230.1 G55.0) 42 (1472) 24.6 G6.3) 18.6 (65.5) 60 511.0 2.19 (4.9)

Jul/1953 29.6 (85.2) 229.4 G52.5) 36 (1256) 26.3 G9.4) 19.1 (66.4) 60 513.2 2.15 (4.8)

Aug/1953 29.2 (84.5) 230.1 (755.0) 36 (1274) 25.2 (77.3) 18.1 (64.5) 40 486 1 1.83 (4.1) 1 i

l l ,

l ,

l i

. - . .. . _ . - . _ ... _ -_ .-.... _ . . ~ _ - . _ - . . . - - . . . , _ _ _ . , . . . -_, -

Table 1-5: 90 F (32.2 C) Isotherms for MNS and MSS for 1953 Predictive Run. .

90*F (32.2*C) ISOTHERM McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION MARSHALL STEAM STATION TOTAL OF BOTH PLANTS '

Surface Laket Shore. Lake 2 Surface Laket Shore- Lake 2 Surface laket Shore- Lake 2

[ MO/YR Area Surface line Shore Area Surface 1me Shore Area Surface line Shore Ha (ac)  % km (mi)  % Ha (ac)  % km (mi)  % Ha (ac)  % km (mi)  %

Jun/ 400 (990) 3 17 (11) 2 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 0 400 (990) 3 17 (11) 2 1953 Jul/1953 768 (1897) 7 25 (16) 3 6 (14) 0 0 (0) 0 774 (1911) 7 25 (16) 3 Au/1953 625 (1545) 5 22 (14) 3 136 (336) 1 3 (2) 0 761 (1881) 6 25 (16) 3 Table 1-6: 5*F (2.8 C) Above Background Temperature Isotherm for MNS and MSS 1953 Predictive Run.

5'F (2.8*C) ABOVE BACKGROUND TEMPERATURE ISOTHERM McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION MARSHALL STEAM STATION TOTAL OF BOTH PLANTS

- Surface Laket Shore. Lake 8 Surface Laket Shore- . Lake 2 Surface Laken Shore- Lake 2 U MO/YR Area Surface line Shore Area Surface line Shore Area Surface line Shore Ha (ac)  % km (mi)  % Ha (ac)  % km (mi)  % Ha (ac)  % km (mi)  %

Jun/ 797 (1969) 7 25 (16) 3 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 0 797 (1969) 7 25 (16) 3 1953 Jul/1953 768 (1897) 7 25 (16) 3 6 (14) 0 0 (0) 0 774 (1911) 7 25 (16) 3 Au/1953 850 (2100) 7 27 (17) 3 234 (579) 2 9 (6) 1 1084 (2679) 9 36 (22) 4

1. Lake surface areas (based on monthly water surface elevations): June 11780 Ha (29100 ac); July 11030 Ha (27250 ac); August 11780 Ha (29100 ac).
2. Based on total shoreline mileage of 840 km (522 mi).

O -

O O 0.0 = 0.0 = 0.0 a B @

-2.0 '

8 a

-2.0 $

8

-2.0 l et

  • " -4.0

-4.0 -4.0 a a 5

-6.0 $ -6.0 I -6.0 $

.. o J JNE "

- .o J UL.Y 4o AUGUST B E B

- m - a .-- a

 ?  ?

$10.0 E $-10.0 E

.E.10.0 , D +' +-

b12.0 [ 12.0 o h12.0 o w a w a w a 83 8 "

N-14.0 --

N-14.0 h-14.0 ,

090% AVG

.=

[ m

@-16.0

.o C

$-16.0 --

=

@-16.0 m Ki a A 00% AVG 18.0

" o-18.0 d

[ o.18.0 --

d a

a 7 d a m o " 20.0

," " 20.0

," "g-20.0 [

k n E 7 a p

g22.0 g22.0 E 22 .0

, , , , ,y g , c

-24.0

  • a90% AVG -

-24.0 g3[

-24.0 , ,g n A100% AVG EL aa 5 -26.0 -

-26.0 CL

-26.0 h a100% AVG uA

-28.0 o -28.0 o -28.0 j u E th

-30.0 " -30.0 " -30.0 y B B 0 ,

-32.0 = -32.0  : -32.0 =.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 TEMPERATURE (deg C) TEMPERATURE (deg Cl TEMPERATURE (deg C)

Figure 1-1. Predicted average temperature profile comparisons for capacity factors of 90% and 100% at both MNS and MSS.

i G,G-CHAPTER 2 WATER CHEMISTRY INTRODUCTION The objectives of the water chemistry portion of the McGuire Nuclear Station (MNS) i NPDES Maintenance Monitoring Program are to:

1) maintain continuity in Lake Norman's chemical data base so as to allow i detection of any significant station-induced and/or natural change in the-physicochemical structure of the lake; and .
2) compare, where appropriate, these physicochemical data to similar data in i other hydropower reservoirs and cooling impoundments in the Southeast.

This year's report focuses primarily on 1992 and 1993. Where appropriate, reference to pre-1992 data will be made by citing reports previously submitted to the- North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

)

The complete water chemistry monitoring program, including specific variables, locations,  !

depths, and frequencies is outlined in Table 2-1. Sampling locations are identified in Figure f 2-1, whereas specific chemical methodologies, along with the appropriate references are  ;

presented in Table 2-2. Data were analyzed using two approaches, both of which were consistent with earlier studies (Duke Power Company 1985,1987,1988a,1989,1990,1991,  ;

1992, 1993). The first method involved partitioning the reservoir into mixing, background, i and discharge zones, and making comparisons among zones and years. In this report, the j discharge includes only. Location 4; the mixing zone encompasses Locations 1 and 5; the -  ;

background zone includes Locations 8,11, and 15. The second approach emphasized a much l broader lake-wide investigation and encompassed the plotting of monthly isotherms and l isopleths, and summer-time striped bass habitat. Several quantitative calculations were also l

performed. These included the calculation of the areal hypolimnetic oxygen deficit (AHOD),

]

numimum whole-water column and hypolimnion heat content, mean epilimnion and hypolimnion heating rates over the stratified period, and the Birgean heat budget.

2-1 I

b

P V RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 7 Precipitation Amount Precipitation in the vicinit, ?f MNS measured about 46 inches in 1993, compared to 49 inches in 1992 (Figure 2-2.). The wettest month of 1993 was March in which 8.65 inches of precipitation fell.

t Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Water temperatures measured in 1993 illustrated similar temporal and spatial trends in the background and mixing zones (Figures 2-3,2-4). Water temperatures in the winter and spring of 1993 were generally equal to or cooler throughout the water column as compared to 1992 in both zones (Figure 2-3,2-4). The only exception to this occurred in February when epilimnion temperatures in the mixing zone were 2 to 5'C (3.6 to 9.0'F) warmer than the p background zone. Both zones exhibited slightly warmer epilimnion and metalimnion V temperatures in the summer of 1993 than in 1992 with the greatest between year differences (3 to 5'C or 5.4 to 9.0'F) measured in July and September. Fall temperatures were similar I l throughout the reservoir in 1992 and 1993. Despite some seasonal and spatial variability in temperature data between 1992 and 1993, the 1993 temperatures were well within the historic range (Duke Power Company 1985, 1989, 1991, 1993). Temperature data at the discharge location in 1993 were generally similar to or slightly cooler than measured in 1992 (Figure 2-

5) and historically (Duke Power Company 1985, 1987, 1988a, 1989, 1900, 1991, 1992, 1993). The warmest temperature at the discharge location in 1993 occurred in August and measured 35.3*C (95.5'F), slightly less than the historic maximum of 36.3*C (97.3'F) measured in August,1991 (Duke Power Company 1992).

2-2 l

1

f

~

V Seasonal and spatial patterns of DO in 1993 were reflective of the patterns exhibited for ten'iperature, i. e., generally similar in both the mixing and background zones (Figures ~ 2-6 and 2-7). Winter and spring DO values generally ranged from about 0.2 to 2.0 mg/l higher throughout the water column in both zones in 1993 than in 1992, and were well within the historic range (Duke Power Company 1985, 1987, 1988a, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993). '

- Summer DO values in 1993 were generally lower throughout the water column in both the '

mixing and background zones than observed in 1992, but within the historic range (Duke Power Company 1985,1987,1988a,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993). These lower values in 1993 may be related, at least partially, to the warmer water temperatures in 1993 which would decrease oxygen solubility and increase microbial respiration (Wetzel 1975). Fall DO values were generally similar between the two years. Some differences were observed in November but these data are probably a reflection of meteorological differences influencing i

' the rate of water column cooling and reoxygenation. Interannual differences in DO are common in Southeastern reservoirs, particularly during the stratified period, and can reflect yearly differences in hydrological, meteorological, and limnological forcing variables (Cole

] and Hannon 1985; Petts1984).

[V The seasonal pattern of DO in 1993 at the discharge location was similar to that measured

) historically, with the highest values observed during the winter and lowest observed in the summer and early-fall (Figure 2-5). Generally, DO values in 1993 were either equal to or slightly less than in 1992, but within the historic range (Duke Power Company 1985,1987, 1988a, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993). The lowest DO concentration measured at the discharge location in 1993 (4.1 mg/1) occurred in August and was slightly lower than the August,1992, low of 5.0 mg/l (Figure 2-5).

Reservoir-wide Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen The monthly reservoir-wide temperature and dissolved oxygen data for 1993 are presented in

. Figures 2-8 and 2-9. For the most part, the temporal and spatial distributional patterns of I both temperature and dissolved oxygen are similar to other cooling impoundments and hydropower reservoirs in the Southeast (Cole and Hannon 1985; Petts 1984). During the winter cooling and mixing period, vertical rather than horizontal homogeneity in temperature I

predominated, with the shallower uplake ' riverine' zone exhibiting slightly cooler s

temperatures than the deeper downlake ' lacustrine' zone (Figure 2-8). These longitudinal  :

2-3 h

r differences in temperatures were clearly illustrated in January and February. The principal factors influencing this gradient in Lake Norman are thermal discharges from MSS and MNS, morphometric (depth) differences within the reservoir, and surface watcr inputs from

- the upper reaches of the reservoir.

The heating period in Lake Norman generally begins in March, as more heat is gained at the water's surface than is lost at night. During the initial stages of the heating period, buoyancy

- forces " smooth out" the horizontal differences in temperature, thereby reducing temperature differences between up-reservoir and down-reservoir locations. Due to the vertical instability of the water column during this period, temperature increases are observed at all depths.

These points are illustrated by contrasting the January and February temperature data with the March and April data (Figure 2-8). As solar radiation and air temperatures increase, heating occurs at a greater rate in the upper waters than in the mid or bottom waters due to differential thermal absorption and vertical density differences (Wetzel 1975, Ford 1985 ).

Eventually, differential heating at the surface leads to the formation of the classical epilimnion, metslimnion, and hypolimnion zones. These zones are clearly depicted in the July,1993 data (Figure 2-8).

) In contrast to most natural lakes, but not unlike many reservoirs in the Southeast, a distinct thermocline within the metalimnion was not observed in Lake Norman in 1993 and is consistent with that observed in previous years (Duke Power Company 1992,1993). Rather, the metalimnion was more or less continuous with respect to vertical density differences within the lower water column, and even showed signs of merging with the hypolitnnion, as illustrated in the August data (Figure 2-8).

Cooling of the water column began in early September as illustrated by decreases in surface temperatures compared to August data. Concurrent with decreases in surface temperatures was an increase in the depth of the epilimnion (caused by convective mixing) and a dismption of the horizontal homogeneity in epilimnion temperatures (caused by reservoir-wide differential heating and cooling, and advective inputs from upstream). Continuation of these differential vertical and horizontal processes led to even more pronounced thermal differences within the reservoir. For example, by October the uplake riverine zone had already ' turned over', while the downlake lacustrine zone was still strongly stratified. Not until early November was Lake Norman completely mixed vertically throughout the 2-4

i I .

reservoir. Morphometric, and in particular, depth differences throughout the longitudinal ,

reaches of the reservoir, coupled with seasonal variability in the volume and density of ,

upstream inputs are major contributors to these horizontal gradients of heating and cooling in ,

reservoirs (Ford 1986;Imberger 1987 ; Petts 1984).

Distributional pattems of dissolved oxygen in 1993 were similar to but not identical to temperature (Figure 2-9). Generally, dissolved oxygen concentrations were greatest during the winter cooling and mixing period when biological respiration was at a minimum and atmospheric reacration was at a maximum. The highest reservoir-wide mean concentration ,

of dissolved oxygen (11.6 mg/l) occurred in March when the reservoir exhibited a mean temperature of 8.7"C or 47.7'F (Figure 2-8). Unlike the thermal regime, no major j longitudinal differences existed in dissolved oxygen within the reservoir during the winter.

Not until the lake became stratified, thereby isolating the metalimnion and hypolimnion from atmospheric reaeration and vertical water mass exchanges, were uplake-to-downlake gradients in dissolved oxygen observed. Longitudinal gradients in metalimnetic and ,

hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen in 1993 were first observed in May. Differential dissolved oxygen depletion and eventual anoxia were first observed in the transitional zone (Locations 15 through 62) where hypolimnetic volume is small, water column and sediment organic 0

matter high, and advective mixing minimal. This longitudinal and progressive display of  ;

oxygen depletion has been reported for many southem U.S. impoundments (Hannon et. al., j 1979; Cole and Hannon 1985; Petts 1984). By August, the complete hypolimnion l throughout the reservoir below elevation 219 m was anoxic. This represents approximately i 22% of the entire volume of the lake at full pond. Complete hypolimnetic deoxygenation 3 (below the thermocline) in natural lakes is indicative of the net effect of cultural eutrophication (Wetzel 1975). Alternatively, the occurrence of hypoxia in reservoirs is '

influenced by a combination of hydrologic, hydraulic, morphometric and limnological factors (Cole and Hannon 1985; Petts 1984; Ruane 1989).

Reacration of the water column started in September concomitantly with the cooling and

~

mixing of the reservoir. Decreasing air temperatures cooled the surface waters resulting in a convective deepening, aided by wind-induced mixing, of the epilimnion. As the oxygenated epilimnion eroded progressively deeper into the water column, the width of the anoxic zone decreased. Longitudinal differences in reaeration were also observed and apparently were .

I

%/ related to differential mixing caused by MNS and MSS, and upstream advective inputs from l

2-5 N _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ , - _ .

7 (v) Lookout Shoals Hydroelectric Facility. Reaeration of the reservoir was essentially complete by early November, except for the bottom waters in the downlake " lacustrine" zone.

Table 2-3 presents some common quantitative limnological calculations for the thermal environment in Lake Norman. Few comparable calculations exist in the literature for reservoirs, but these data are generally within the "ballpark" of those presented by Hutchinson (1957) for natural lakes at similar latitudes throughout the world.

Table 2-4 presents the 1993 AHOD for Lake Norman compared to similar estimates for 18 TVA reservoirs. The data illustrate that Lake Norman exhibits an AHOD that is similar to other Southeastern reservoirs of comparable depth, chlorophyll a status, and secchi depth.

Striped Bass Habitat Suitable pelagic habitat for adult striped bass, defimed as that layer of water with Q temperatures s 26 C and DO levels 2: 10 mg/1, was found lake-wide from October 1992 through June 1993. Beginning in late June, habitat reduction proceeded rapidly throughout the reservoir both as a result of deepening of the 26*C isotherm and metalimnetic and

) hypolimnetic deoxygenation (Figure 2-10). Complete habitat elimination occurred sometime in mid-July and persisted until mid-September, or about 2 months. Refugia for adult striped bass were recorded during this period but these areas were oflimited size and restricted to the uplake, riverine sections of the reservoir just below the Lookout Shoals Hydroelectric facility. Physicochemical habitat was observed to expand appreciably in late September, primarily as a result of epilimnion cooling, and in response to changing meteorological conditions The temporal and spatial pattem of striped bass habitat expansion and reduction observed in 1993 was similar to that previously reported in Lake Norman and many other Southeastern reservoirs (Coutant 1985, Matthews 1985; DPC 1992, DPC 1993). The duration of complete habitat elimination in 1993 was greater than observed in 1992 but well within the historic range.

2-6 L

I a V

Turbidity and Specific Conductance  ;

Surface turbidity values were low at the MNS discharge, mixing zone, and mid-lake background locations during 1992 and 1993, ranging from 2-6 NTUs (Table 2-5). Bottom turbidity values were also low over the two-year period, ranging form 1-10 NYUs (Table 2-5). These values were well within the range (Duke Power Company 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992).

Specific conductance in Lake Norman in 1993 ranged from 51 to 88 umho/cm and was similar to that observed in 1992 (Table 2-5) and historically (Duke Power Company 1989,1992). Specific conductance in surface and bottom waters was generally similar throughout the year except in late fall at several of the deeper locations when bottom waters averaged about 20-40 umhos/cm higher than surface values. These increases in conductance were undoubtedly related te the release of soluble iron and manganese from the lake bottom under anoxic conditions (Table 2-5).

CN pH and Alkalinity t

During 1993, pH and alkalinity values were similar among MNS discharge, mixing, and mid-take-lake background zones (Table 2-5); they were also similar to values measured in 1992 (Table 2-5) and historically (DPC 1989,1992). Individual pH values in 1993 ranged from 6.1 to 6.9, whereas alkalinity ranged from 10.6 to 23.8 mg-CACO3 /l.

Major Cations and Anions The concentrations (mg/l) of major ionic species in the MNS discharge, mixing, and mid-lake background zones are provided in Table 2-5. The overall ionic composition of Lake Norman during 1993 was similar to that reported for 1992 (Table 2-5) and previously (Duke Power Company 1989,1992). Lake-wide, the major cations were sodium, calcium, magnesium, and potassium; major anions were bicarbonate, sulfate, and chloride.

2-7

0 Nutrients Nutrient concentrations in the discharge, mixing, and mid-lake background zones of Lake Norman are provided in Table 2-5. Overall, nitrogen and phosphorus levels in 1993 were similar to those measured in 1992 and historically (Duke Power Company 1989,1990,1991, 1992); they are also characteristic of the lake's oligo-mesotrophic status (Rodriguez 1982).

Ammonia nitrogen concentrations increased in bottom waters in each of the three zones during the summer and fall, concurrent with the development of anoxic conditions. Total and soluble phosphorus concentrations in 1993 were similar to values recorded in 1992 and historically (Duke Power Company 1989,1990,1991,1992,1993).

Metals Metal concentrations in the discharge, mixing, and mid-lake background zones of Lake ,

Norman for 1993 were similar to that measured in 1992 (Table 2-5) and historically (DPC 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993). Iron concentrations near the surface were generally low (s 0.1 mg/1) during 1992 and 1993, whereas iron levels near the bottom were slightly higher during the stratified period, particularly in early fall. Similarly, manganese concentrations in the surface and bottom waters were generally low ($ 0.1 mg/1) in both 1992 and 1993, except during the summer and fall when bottom waters approached or became anoxic (Table 2-5).

Manganese concentrations near the bottom rose above the NC water quality standard (0.5 mg/l) at various locations throughout the lake in summer and fall of both years, and is characteristic of historic conditions (Duke Power Company 1989,1990,1991, 1992, 1993). -

Heavy metal concentrations in Lake Norman never approached NC water quality standards, and there were no consistent appreciable differences between 1992 and 1993.

FUTURE STUDIES ,

No changes are planned for the Water Chemistry portion of the Lake Norman maintenance ,

monitoring program during 1994.

l ,

6 2-8 I

l

t

. (/'% .

SUMMARY

Temporal and spatial trends in water temperature and DO data collected monthly in 1993 ~

were similar to those observed historically. Temperature and DO data collected in 1993 were within the range of previously measured values.

Reservoir-wide isotherm and isopleth information for 1993, coupled with heat content and hypolimnetic oxygen data, illustrated that Lake Norman exhibited thermal and oxygen dynamics characteristic of historic conditions and similar to other Southeastern reservoirs of comparable size, depth, flow conditions, and trophic status.

Availability of suitable pelagic habitat for adult striped bass in Lake Norman in 1993 was l

generally similar to historic conditions. Reservoir-wide habitat elimination was observed to persist for approximately 2 months in 1993. This is somewhat longer than the duration of complete habitat elimination observed in 1992, but similar to that in earlier years.

All chemical parameters measured in 1993 were within the concentration ranges previously reported for the lake during both MNS preoperational and operational years. As has been observed historically, manganese concentrations in the bottom waters in the summer and fall of 1993 often exceeded the NC water quality standard.

LITERATURE CITED Coutant, C. C.1985. Striped bass, temperature, and dissolved oxygen: a speculative hypothesis for environmental risk. Trans. Amer. Fisher. Soc. I14:31-61.

Duke Power Company.1985. McGuire Nuclear Station,316(a) Demonstration. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1987. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program: 1986 summary.

Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

O 2-9 1

)/

Duke Power Company,1988a. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program: 1987 summary.

Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1988b. Mathematical modeling of McGuire Neclear Station thermal discharges. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1989. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring pwgram: 1988 suminary.

Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1990. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program: 1989 summary.

Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1991. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program: 1990 summary.  ;

Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1992. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program: 1991 summary. '

Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1993. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program: 1992 summary.

Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Hannan, H. H., I. R. Fuchs and D. C. Whittenburg. 1979 Spatial and temporal patterns of temperature, alkalinity, dissolved oxygen and conductivity in an oligo-mesotrophic,

)

deep-storage reservoir in Central Texas. Hydrobilologia 51 (30);209-221.

Higgins, J. M. and B. R. Kim.1981. Phosphorus retention models for Tennessee Valley Authority reservoirs. Water Resour. Res.,17:571-576.

Higgins, J. M., W. L. Poppe, and M. L. Iwanski.1981. Eutrophication analysis of TVA reservoirs. In: Surface Water Impoundments. H. G. Stefan, Ed. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.,

NY, pp.404-412.

Hutchinson, G. E.1957. A Treatise on Limnology, Volume I. Geography, Physics and Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, NY.

Hydrolab Corporation.1986. Instructions for operating the Hydrolab Surveyor Datasonde.

Austin, TX. 105p.

Matthews, W. J., L. G. Hill, D. R. Edds, and F. P. Gelwick. 1980. Influence of water quality and season on habitat use by striped bass in a large southwestem reservoir. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118: 243-250.

\u ,

2-10

Pctts O. E.,1984, impounded Rivers: Perspectives For Ecological Management. John Wiley and Sons. New York. 326pp.

Rodriquez, M. S.1982. Relationships between phytoplankton growth rates and nutrient dynamics in Lake Norman, NC DPC DUKEPWR/82-01.11untersville, NC 39p.

Ryan, P. J. and D. F. R. Ilarleman.1973. Analytical and experimental study of transient cooling pond behavior. Report No.161. Ralph M. Parsons Lab for Water Resources and Ilydrodynamics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Stumm, w. and J. J. Morgan.1970. Aquatic chemistry: an introduction emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters. Wiley and Sons,Inc. New York, NY 583p.

Wetzel, R. G.1975. Limnology. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelaphis, Pennsylvania,

  • 743pp.

~

\

2-11 j b -.

m q

% J Table 2-1. Water chemistry program for the McGuire Nuclear Station NPDES long-term maintenance monitoring on Lake l

Norman.

u.ounsNPDss smrum moans semple Cellusion Schadida for1993 80 13.0 14.0 110 119 610 69.0 710 30.0 16.0

! PARAMETERS LOCATIONS to 10 40 50 9.5 11.0 23 23 15 7 5 4 3 33 5 20 32 23 27 21 10 DEPTH (m) 33 SAM CODE D43rIU ANALY315 E Oxysm Inetu _ ere =IW manhiy a the above lan=ha== a la meervels tcus 0.3m to la above benamt Memeuremerem are taken weekly &cm W fa sniped bamm habsumt pH I lab Conductmty H NUTRIENT ANALYSES s i hi. h3, $hv hs3 N or n itrite AnNu, win QfT, Qr, w> wr> va w> A 5fT 5/T OTE Q/TE QTA .A QTA wT QTA Total Ehospes AA TP.DG-P QTS QTE h$ hD h hB QTB h2 h3 QTS h h2 h$

5/IE TKN AA TKN sfT.B EUiMENTAL ANALYSBS N QTA QfTD 5/T M 3/TE ST QTA QTS Qfr3 Qff3 Alummurn E*""

ICP-24 E:!I Es @s @ Es @s Mi @s @$ QT Ms Ms E E:!: Ms Ms M Gs Ms Wi Gi Mi M Wi Gi G t2:" N M~ #h Ws Ms M Mi QTA Mi QTA Mi QT.B Ms QTE 5s QT,B M

QT Wi Q/I B Ms QT.B 5,T Imc ICP-24 Q/TE Qft.B QT S,T 3/TJ 3/T Cadman HGACD S/IE S/T Sfr3 3/T3 ST S/TE 5,T S/TA S/TE S/T SfTJ HGACU S/I B 5/T Sft,B 3/T HGArPB SITE SfT StT.B ADDmONAL ANALYSES Qff QfTS QffE ST Alkaluuty T-AIXT OTS QTS Q/T QfIS OfTA Qff3 QTS QfTD QT.B S/T Qff,B QTA Qfr.B QT.B QfT QfTS Turtnoty F-TURB QTE QfrE Qff Q/TE ST.B S/T S/T.B S/T Sulfate UV504 STE 5/T S/T S/TE S/T Total Sohds 5-TSE S/TS Sff 3/TS S/T 3/T 3/I.B 3/T 3/T.B Tots!5uspmdedSohd S-T35E 3/T.B CODES. Frequency Q-Quarterly (FeAMay, Nov) 3 = E- ' " Feb,Ang)

T - Top (0.3m) B- (la above banose) ,

r~ -

e ~

( :p\

\~ , (s_- )

Table 2-2. Water chemistry methods and analyte detection limits for the McGuire Nuclear Station NPDES long-term maintenance program for Lake Norman.

~ ~~

Preservatten Detection Limit Variables d Methed 4'C 1mg-CACO,.1-'*

Alkalinity total .I' Electrometric titration to a pH of 5.1' C.5% HNO, 0.3 mg.1-8 Aluminum Atoste emission /ICP-direct injection 8 4*C 0.050 m gl-*

A.-e:n t um Automated phenate' O.5% HNO, 0.1 pg 1-8 Cacstum Atomic' absorption / graphite furnace-direct injection' O 5% HNO, 0.04 eg 1 8 Caletum Atomic' emission /ICP-direct injection' 4*C 1.0 mg 1-8 Chloride Automated ferr1 Cyanide

  • In-sttu 1 ymho cm-8*

Ccnductance, specific Temperature compensated nic'kel electrode' Atomte absorption / graphite furnace-direct injection' O.5% HNO, 0.5 99 1 8 Cepper 4'C 0.10cg.1-8 Fluoride Potentiometric' O.5% HNO, 0.1 mg 1-'

Iren Atomic emission /ICP-direct injection' 0.5% HNO. 2.0 vg 1-8 tead Atomic absorption graphite furnace-direct injection' O.5% HNO, 0.001 mg 1-8 Magnesfum Atomic emission /ICP-direct injection' O.5% HNO, 0.003 mg 1-8 Man;anese Atomic emission /ICP-direct injection' 4*C 0.050 mg.1-5 W Nitrite + Nitrate Automated Cadmium reduction' 4'C 0.005 eg.1-8 Orth:phesphate Automated ascorbic acid' reduction, in-sttu 0.1 mg 1-

Onygen, dissolved Temperature compensated polarographic cell' Temperature compensated glass electrode s In-situ 0.1 std. units

  • pH 4*C 0.005 mg 1- 8" Ehosphorus. total Persulfate digestion followed by automated ascorbic acid O.015 mg 1-'"

reouction' Atomic absorption graphite furnace-direct injection' O.5% HNO, 0.1 mg l' totassium al 4*C 0.5 mg 1 Silica Automated molydostlicate' Atomic emission /ICP-direct injection' O.5% HNO 0.3 m g1**

Sedtum Turbidimetric. using a spectrophotometer' 4'C 1.0 mg 1-'

Sulfate Thermistor / thermometer' In-sttu D.I'C' Teeperature 4'C 1 NTU*

Turbidity Nephelometric turbidity' Itnc Atomic emission /ICP-direct injection' O.5% HNO, 4991

' United States Environmental Protection Agency 1979. Methods for chemical analysts of water and wastes.

Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory. Cincinnatt. OH.

8U5 EPA. 1982.. *

'USEPA. 1984

  • Instrument sensttivity used instead of detection limit.

" Detection limit changed during 1989.

y l I

l I

Table 2-3. Ileat content calculations for the thermal regime in Lake Norman in 1993. j l

Maximum areal heat content 28,141 g cal em 2 j l

Maximum hypolimnetic (below 11.5 m) 15,106 g cal em 2  !

areal heat content l Birgean heat budget 19,251 g cal em 2 I i

1 Epilimnion (above 11.5 m) heating 0.114 C/ day 1 l

rate  ;

I l

Hypolimnion (below 11.5 m) heating 0.087 C/ day i rate  ;

\ l 1

l l

I l

l l

2-14 l

e -. . l

F .

O b  !

Table 2-4. A comparison of areal hypolimnetic oxygen deficits (AIIOD), summer chlorophyll a (chi a), secchi depth (SD), aral mean depth of Lake Norman and 18 TVA reservoirs.

AIIOD Summer Chi a Secchi Depth Mean Depth Reservoir (mg/cm2/day) (ug/L) (m) (m)

Lake Norman 0.057 5.0 3.0 10.3

~

TVAa Mainstem Kentucky 0.012 9.1 1.0 5.0 Pickwick 0.010 3.9 0.9 6.5 Wilson 0.028 5.9 1.4 12.3 Wheelee 0.012 4.4 5.3 Guntersville 0.007 4.8 1.1 5.3 i Nickajack 0.016 2.8 1.1 6.8

) Chickamauga 0.008 3.0 1.1 5.0 Watts Bar 0.012 6.2 1.0 7.3  !

Fort London 0.023 5.9 0.9 7.3

)

Tributary Chatuge 0.041 5.5 2.7 9.5 Cherokee 0.078 10.9 1.7 13.9 Douglas 0.046 6.3 1.6 10.7 Fontana 0.113 4.1 2.6 37.8 liiwassee 0.061 5.0 2.4 20.2 l Norris 0.058 2.1 3.9 16.3 South IIolston 0.070 6.5 2.6 23.4 Tims Ford 0.059 6.1 2.4 14.9 Watauga 0.066 2.9 2.7 24.5 a Data from Ifiggins et al. (1980), and Iliggins and Kim (1981) j 1

l 2-15 I

l b

m i N s Table 2-5. Quarterly surface (o.3 m) and bottom (bottom minus 1 m) water chemistry for the MNS discharge, mixing zone, and background locations on Lake Norman during 1993. Values less than detection were assumed to be the detection limit for calculating a mean.

utens Za,. neog 2,. nsNe peswes tang 2ee essayeug assayese toCA70e to to 40 Se se 110 DEP7N- 1 Ween Basom IWace Seema Subse meanse Suesm outes enemm outsee sesem PaAAMETE93 YEAR 12 93 12 e3 12 e3 12 e3 M e3 W S3 M e3 W e5 12 e5 12 e3 M 93 Twtwry trawl Fe 2 4 3 6 3 4 3 5 3 3 2 4 4 4 2 4 3 F 4 W W 11 Mey NS e e 10 4 S e e NS 7 NS S e e MS s e 12 NS 12 te a Aag 2 2 1 6 2 2 2 7 2 2 2 3 4 11 2 2 4 a 3 3 4 e New _._L 3 J e 2 3 7 1 3 J J 2 e 4 2 2 y ,,,,,,,,__g JJ 3 J 2 mmm u.en 2 33 3 Fs 33 F ITS 35 45 7 2 67 15 2 33 S F 2 US SJS 725 FJS e 73 armat Conemerce breware Feb Se Se e0 Se Se Se et SS 90 57 s7 Se 57 SS e4 90 57 S2 e7 50 se Se key so S1 es $1 si as so 31 et so og 33 en se so 31 et si e1 4e ei se ase 80 S1 7e e3 so 51 77 Se et S2 80 St 73 e1 e0 51 74 Se e1 $2 74 81 m _ 11 55 !L _._!e se $2 se se so _,_.g _gg, _,,,gt _jg, _31 ,,,,.,gg, ,,,Jt _gt _gs ,, gt se et _.g, amesu a se s s33 73 3 ** se s Su Fi e es e soa s3 se s3 e23 se.3 ans 52 e3 S ei S eu s13 as s3 e msess Fe Se se se se se se es se se e.F es se 7 et F es F es F se es es wey se se se e3 er se se es se se se se se as as se tF es to 7.s tF e3 a r eS e3 at F e3 83 e se e F e4 e4 at 72 es e4 e n es e3 at No.

am.i use.

_e e, e se eo er ee e4 ee es eF ee eF e4

. 833 es _sa as

_gi e se

,s.g 1 43

_gi ses eF e.se e4 ee

_g_e as

,,,.,1t tes

.J.a.

ee

_g1 _,,.g3 _st _ta, e se se 7 te1

_g.1 ee e s3 ts Asserey trne CACO 34 y Fe 12 e 11 1 13 11 3 12 e 11 e 13 113 12 2 11 3 tis 11 3 12.7 11e til 11 3 11F it s 13.3 it s 13e it.

a Woy NS 10 0 12 9 TO s 12 e 1e 12 e te s MS 19 3 Ne it 4 12 e 114 MS 1&F 11e 19 3 NS tee 11e 181 Awe 11 3 11.F 15 4 13 9 122 its te F iSA 12 11A 12 11e te3 142 12 fte its to its 12.3 toe 1:4 N

Arvtal Mesi 12 F _,,81 yE ,,,,H.1 E 14e E EE EE E ,,,,313 EE EE11 e EE E _,U1 123 11 5 15 7 15 4 12 e 11 5 14 4 1s F 115 it s 12 4 11 8 11F 11e 12.5 134 ile 117 11A 117 11F osaaoo rvo re s 2e se 23 s.7 17 e 23 e4 le s.4 1e s.4 is 7 1e E3 13 ee 22 72 2 usy NS 41 Fe 4 12 15 s.4 42 NS 17 NS 17 S.1 1e MS 4.3 17 42 NS 32 58 12 aus $2 es e 4.7 s2 4 s3 is e 4 s.2 s ou (1 se s 11 s2 s.e 7 se 4 New J 41 S J 47 ,,,,,4,,1 13. J ,,J1 J 4.F 44 es J JJ$4 JJ4 85 JGR 1],, S7 _,,,,31 AmW Mean 4 9F 3 e3 e os 3 83 $2 3 e5 s13 3.Se S TF 1 83 51 4 14e 3M AJA 4 4.30 ese 3 33 mr ee ,c Fe NS NS NS Ns a 13 e se 41 se 17 NS NS Ne NS 7 41 s3 So MS Ne ne Ne m.e _MS_ NS NS NS NS $ J _j_S MS ,,,,13 E NS Me ,g,_,, Ne e NS ,,,Le L NS M_,, MS Ammf ueen e F S2 Se 4 3e Se 4 21 F 412 S.3 44 Cam trigg Fe 2e 1S 2e 26 1F 1s 28 2e 2.s ,13 1F is 2e to le is 17 2e 17 17 if 17 Mey NS 15 NS 2e NS 2.5 NS 2e MS 13 Ne le MS 17 NS 2.s MS le MS le Me 2.S Ang 25 17 2.0 13 2.5 17 3 33 2.5 2.s 2.S 20 3 3.1 25 10 11 14 10 23 11 34 Now ,,,,J1 27 J _J} J ,,,_le, J irs ,,,,,1) 2F ,,,,lg ,,,,,21 ,,,1Z, ,,,1g, ,,,,1g 2 ,,_13, ,,,JL ,,,13 _,13, __13. _,J1 _,,,ji Amm wee. 2 s3 2e 2 sF 3 2e 2Se 3 o3 is ze p tes ir IFS le 1 83 tr ze 183 17 it is werwea rvo Fe 12 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 May NS 11 12 11 11 tt 11 11 MS 1.1 MS 11 1.2 12 Ne 1.1 1.1 11 NS 1.1 12 11 Aug 1.2 12 13 13 12 12 14 13 1J 13 12 12 13 1.3 12 13 14 13 12 13 14 14 New ,,11 ,,,,,j,3 ,,,,,,11 14 13 Jt1e 13 14 13 J u 1.3 ,_,11 J _t,3 JJ JJ u ,_,Q J2, J J2, Amm ue.a 1 23 im 13 12s t23 us us is is u us us im us im ur u u im N3 e Nel Sangend i e

m

- _ , , . e. _ , , . . . . _ _ _ - . _ _ - , , . _ m ,. _ _ , _ - . , . .

g~s

/ \

4

\'v J 23.: 22 " " 3;;;M . .. ;E; 88888 g, 1 *:* q: U s

  • qs. c1a "E1a 500:8 *;g;*. gggp a :22: " .as:m g; :t : """ 83838 y . ...

3 O** 9  ;*2:5 22200 323; "

85!83 *E; OI

  • EE 88R28 y

"I:  : *t"

  • 252fg st;;; g3938

. ... gpl ag

  • a"a
  • g * =}8 002*$ ::'*: 222": 32:': 8358! ;;;  :$ 8888 8 202": ":2 8. 2f2t " 8s8 8 """

3 : 2 *' A  ; :: 8E8E8 p ]. ...

1., *05 3 *:2*a. 2"20 * ;E3;; 55588

28. """ 88888 p 01:0t. GE:  :

. 2E22 " st;;; 3.2888 2R; 2$ 8E8E8 00;;8 . 2*G:2 2220 " EE:;M . D. 8 6. -8. Of: SE

  • EE #888 8 g

2000s :g==s. 23:10 E;2"8. 88.s8 . ... It Of

  • 81828 y .

b

<~'s  :::=. ::2:a. 222:: ss:;; s .s s..28  ::: n nr f ) = g .

8 8 8 ~]8

\ /

\/ :t::s. :s::: 21: : ;t;;; ornas rt :t: """

  • s*t8 y . ...

) 23:28 ::2:2 2220: &&s;; s. ..

s B .88 .

D*8- """ 88888 g .

22:08 323:0 25 E " Ef;~; 9. t .s t.8. ;E; 0 3 828E8

g. p
2 ;:S 22::: 22::: assa: s;; ::s. """ '

j, ....

88eel8 p

-* ::2;8. 22:.: ;;2;:

1 ..=n: -

r;
l.:

8.8 e t

H I~g -

]. 1. .

ed ..

..4'. ... 0

~

l y

2 000 *; .

8. "E"E  ;;~;; 25838 .. ..
F; *E8E8
    • """"  ;;; "E: 2E
s. n.  ;";2: GD8cu 8888 c

, g .....

t N p

"  ;*2:A. CI E  ;;.**. 998 . . .

U IE CE: #E8E8 a

T e I

d  ::: : ::2*g :""" "  ;;;;; s s.. ..s : s.  ;;; :10 22 8888 8

{jg 3

,::3 ,: :. ::::: ;,;; ; s ., =. = =. ..  ::: 2:2 8

. p m

N ft N .M I I I I I I I I I

/

( j) l

$ lfsfril lstrillstrij siril p stril ls11 13 13r1 9 31711

. , I i 3,

& 4 m V a 4 2-17 N ___ -

g -

x N A s I \

s V Table 2-5. Continued.

name 2=. semie team esse seems. mang 2-=  % a.my =w tocarce 10 2e se s0 es 11.s DEPtst !Wace Sasam Armee Beaum tw9mee tr'see Osame as9ase Dumum trines Basem ewwstras vur n n w ss w es w as w as w as w as w as w as w ss w as serve get)

Fee 177 143 1ee tse tre see 203 14e im 14s in 140 in tas 2te 142 198 its 24 N3 23 21 2 we, as 270 m ses 2s 2ss see 3Se us 2mr we ses 22e m us 2as mer see 2st 2n 3Se

% 127 e3 335 '77 150 305 300 35 211 128 153 114 227 et 12r e5 2Be 2es se er 200 223 New ?Os Se e? SO 13? 80 in 50 90 J 90 *er e5 Bs se e1 1't to 140 tes 9er J amoru a t37 $.e 2w ns iro 20e as se se 1as 13. tsr no ist 147 sei 2ae 22 tss sSa 2es zss NM Fe 50 50 50 SO 50 SD SO 90 90 90 SO SO 90 90 SO SO SO 90 30 30 74 SG Woy Ns 50 SG 50 SO SO SO SD Ns 90 MS SO SO SD Me 50 SO SO 90 SO 90

% so 50 SO e2 SO Se $1 90 et 50 SO SO Ss 100 m 90 111 tir 30 re r3 101 New J 1t* J ett J tis t . 72e 90 J GD J 74 101 90 _ eB 112 J S0 teS et 149 am u , 30 en ses 2ti se 79 s e.'s3 no se s is s s3 s se s so sa 3 se s ei s ao s ao s se ao s ri s ers Tse Pearsewous fuges se us se as e us te as is as 52 as e ns 11 ns is as la me as ne is Wey Ns it Ms t. Ns 12 Ns 14 N3 13 Ns 1 MS 1 MS 13 NE tr NS te NS 20

% e s e. s r r r r r i si e to r a r a a s r e e me. JJ r e e e a11s is  ? J e e aJ J e a e e 1 J __ n a, sus ween 9 es 4s 9 9 $0 3 11.3 r 92s es ss 11 sm r.s 10.2 ts 11 e ss 14 ts s 13 3 oww.=rw. m F. ms s as a ns e as s as s us s me s me s ne r as e me e us, as s as to ar s as r us 1 ws r ns a no a ne o as 12 we 13

% 11 s e r s s e s a .s s s 7 s s s s 4 e s r s n

ww, J

ss ss r e e i ts e

es o e s rs 13 es e

e 2s t0 es J. 10 rs ss s 11 e

as.rs $1 e

s s

a as em e a es r e

11 e

it e rs seca N Fee $3 42 s1 42 31 42 $2 42 st 42 $ 4.1 $ 42 s.4 42 4e 43 s' 4.s $$ de pey Ns 42 s as de 41 s 43 NS 43 MS 42 3 4.4 NS 41 s 43 MS 41 El 4.s tg 4 3r 3s 40 43 1r af s 38 38 Se 38 33 45 4.4 10 14 11 4s 30 Se 49 4e g

a New w w.ni Ju 44 4a 40 J e se en e2 4 .e 43 en er J4e ese JJur o ss J

em us 44 J4.rs 44 os JJ ur J 4 em 44 u

4.1 em os 4.s JJ its s ee

.s . ,,e ,

O

c o,

,'~x  ; *'

_-)-

k -

E s

[:!t1s

.a 4+

a.r

{$5

r*** .

l

~'i::'::'

sg,;etsa.v?ghjf~

agg s

  • ~

y y *,

g

p .

j 4 b5

,y  ? .

A(

jh% a$ j" Ii \ .

(- , s,\o

, 0 Yho *~

,o#* o o

l~' .

= > y'

/ /  : 5

( e y

P

  • +,,, O l

+%g. j i

  • E ~hp t t o, a

f i

Figure 2-1. Sampling locations on Lake Norman, North Carolina during maintenance monitoring program for McGuire Nuclear Station.

w 2-19

O McGuire Rainfall  ;

10 -

8-

~

6-g

.c O 4-o ' ' ' ' '

JAN'FEB MAR APRMAYJUN JUL'AUG'SEP OCTNOV'DEC Month i O 1992 M 1993 i

l i

Figure 2-2. Monthly precipitation in the vicinity of McGuire Nuclear Station.

2-20 b_ _________ .

r- - _.

MARCH JANUARY FEB, s

%s )

0- ,

0- 0- ,

s

- I r

- p s '

10 - li 10 - , 10 -

a f, -

~

' - I g m - m

  • y E 8 E -

i E -

{ 20 -

E { 20 - '

{ 20 - i b l O O -

i a

30 - i 30 - 30 -

40 40 .ei..j....gie.4g6 asgi444g6464l.66sg 40 ,,,,g ..,g . g.,,,gi . g...,g,,,,g ,,,,g..., ,,,,

,,,,g,,,,g ,,g.,,,g 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Temperature *C Temperature 'O Temperature *C ta MAY JUNE h APRIL 0- 7 0- o-~

8 i .

- . i 10 - 10 ,

to .

E ,

5

  • E -

{ 20- ', { 20 - _

g 20-8 i 5 -

8  :

8 . i 30 - i 30 -- l 30 -

i

- . sa 40 40 40

,,,ig ..,g,,,,g ,,,g... g .. g.,,,g ,,,,g.. g .. g .. g... g... g . g ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Temperature 'C Temperature 'O Temperature *C Figure 2-3. Monthly mean temperature profiles for the McGuire Nuclear Station background zone in 1992 ( ... )

and 1993 (-).

- - - _ _ - - --__ _- ----_-- _ e _.__e-_ _n -,m , . , w= .,

[% - .

FN.

A T SEPTEMBER 0- 0-

, 0- -

i -

. # I

$ e 10 - # .

  1. 10 - i 10 -

. . t n o n '

E E , E ,"

E 20 - I' { 20- '

O O

{ 20 _

Q .

30 - 30 -

30 -

40 i,,ig ..,g,,,,g g, g . gi iig 40

....g...g...g...g....g..g...l 40 ... g....g....g....g... g...ig,,,,g 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5- 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 to 15 20 25 30 35 Temperature *C Temperature *C Temperature *C

'.'* OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER tJ N) o_

. s o. . 0 -~

I

. g i

a 10 - e 10-10 - a

~ ~

^

^ t a E '

{ 20 - 8

{ 20 - { 20 -

5 , $ 5 $ .'

y . .

30- '

30 '

30 }

i 40

,,,,,,,,,g ...g...,g. ..gi. .g. .g 40

.,,g...,,,,,,,,,g...,g....g....; 40

...g....g....gi..g....g....g...ig 0 5 to 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 to 1d' 20 25 30 35 Temperature *C Temperature 'O Temperature 'C Figure 2-3. Continued.  ;

v

,,~ s JANUARY F Y MARCH 0- o_ o_ ,

e a r to- jo_ j o _- ,

- e . i .

5 _ , E -

i E -

a 20 - , 7 { 205 '

{ 205 t 0 - 8 l - - I 30 - '

30 5 8

30 ,E l . . I 40' 40 40

....gi...g.i..g..iil6666joiiijiisig ,,,,g,,,,g .. g... g .. g .. g .ieg ,,,,g ..,g ..

g... ,,,,g ,,, ,,,,

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Temperature 'C Temperature *C Temperature 'C APRIL MAY JUNE tg 0- , 0- ,

0-w ,

I us -

g

. /' . . t f,,

10 - 10- 10 - ,

s E E -

E -

fe - . , -

{ 20 II

{ 20- -

{ 20 -

5 8  : '

d  :

. r . .

30 - 305 30 -

. n . Is .

~ ~

40 40 40

....g....gi.. gi46 g ii peingiaiij ,,,,g.,,,g ..g.. g... g... g... g ,,,,g,,,,g . Jg.,,,g,,,,g ,,,g ,,,g o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 to 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 to i15 20 25 30 35 Temperature *C Temperature *C Temperature *C Figure 2-4. Monthly mean temperature profiles for the McGuire Nuclear Station mixing zone in 1992 (... )

and 1993 (-).

(-~

l ~ -

JULY SEPTEMBER A( 0-0- 0_ -

. i s -

^o 10 ,' 10 - ,' 10 7 ,

, . o f

.l $

o E 20 - "

' 6 20 - g 20 - , s

? S

~

c o 8 -

30 - ,

30 - 30 I 40 40

,,,,g,,,,g. g .. g.,,,g . .g,.. g 40 ',,,,g...,g,,,,g ..

g...ig,,,,g ,,,g ,,,,g .. g ..,g...,g...,g,i g. . g 0 5 to 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Temperature *C Temperature 'O Temperature *C OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER y 0- .

0- . o- i 4 ,

. g s -

i .

10 - , 10 - , jo 8 a - i .

E s E

~

i E -

{ 20 - 8

{ 20 - I g 205 5  : ,' 8  : 8  : ,

o ,

g 30 '

30- 30 - '

s -

~

40 40

,,,,g ,,g ,,,g... g... g ..,g,,,,g ,,,,g,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,g 4o ,,,,,,,,,,,,,!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 19* 20 25 30 35 Temperature 'C Temperature 'O Temperature 'C Figure 2-4. Continued.

-*N9 y-- >- E _ _ _- _ _ _ - .mm_ _ _ _ . _ _ 2 __

l 40

/^)

V 35 - M O

"W30 - 8 a

o E E D 25 -

F a a a . .

g20- .

m , ,

Q m 2 15 -

W H

10 -

m 5  :  :  : l l  :  :  :  : :

JAN FEB MAR APR MAYJUN JUL AUG SEP OCTNOVDEC MONTH l.=tm aim l 12 D 3 O s 2 "10 "a-e .

i 9- a 7 "

W 8-- O O 7 a o Q k--

O 6 n

=

a a S- a

W o

>4

_J 3--

O u) 2--

9 1-Q 0  :  :  :  :  : l l l . ,

JAN FEBMARAPRMAYJUN JUL AUGSEP OCTNOVDEC MONTH

[ = tm a sml Figure 2-5. Monthly temperature and dissolved oxygen data at the discharge location ,

in 1992 and 1993.

2-25 l- _

f O MARCH N -.i JANUARY FEBRUf )

t -

g

. s 4 -

s . g' ,

10 8 10 - , 10 - ,

g .

a 1 ~

5 -

E  ; ,

{ 20 - ,, , { 20 - ) g 20 - s

$  : 2

$ I 8

$ 8

. . t t .

30 - 30 - [

A 30 _ I 40 3 .,-. ;,; ... ... .,-. ., 40 .. ... .. ,... ... . . ..., 40 ',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , , ,,

0 2 4 6 8 10 '12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) Dissolved Oxygen (mga) Dissolved Oxygen (mga)

APRIL MAY JUNE Y

u 0- .

o_ 0 7 .a O _' 8 ,,

s .

10 -

s r 10 - I ,r

- 1 t o _- E -

,s

- r n

_ 3 .

E , E -

E  :

20 - { 20 i h207 o I y -

s i O -

s

+

. g ,

' 8 30 I 8 30 30 l e( d

_ n 40 . . . .... .... ....... ..., 40 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

40 ...... .

g....... ...',,...,...,

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 ,.10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) Dissolved Oxygen (m'go) Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) t Figure 2-6. Monthly mean dissolved oxygen profiles for the McGuire Nuclear Station mixing zone in 1992 ( ... ) .  ;

and 1993 (-).

p k " s_jsT sEeTEusER'd 0- 0- 0-4 . t t

r r ' * '

e ,

,a i

10 - ,' 10 _ , 10 -

~

e 7 i -

E t E -

s  : _

= 20 - i i' { 20-t

{20-'

o  : [ 5 ,

}

30 - 30 - 30 -

40 40 ..........,... ... ... ...I 40 ........... ... ..... .,. .,

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Dissolved Oxygen (mgn) Dissolved Oxygen (mga) DissoNed Oxygen (mgn)

NOVEMBER DECEMBER OCTOBER 0- 0- ,y 0- ,

~

4 ,

. J

- 1 10 -

l4 ' 10 -

. g g i 10 -

o i

- l e '

- 8 -

s n  !

- a E -

E i -

E -

i t

r ie20 -

j,o 20 - . ,>

- { 20 -

o 3

o -

o .

. I - ,

, - t 8

, 30 -

30 -' 30 _ ,

g i

40 .......,m . ... ... ...,,,,,.

40 .,3 ,. . . ... .. .... ..., 40 ........... ........... ...,

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 i- 6 8 10 12 14 Dissolved Oxygen (mgn) Dissoked Oxygen (mga)

Dissolved Oxygen (mgn) t Figure 2-6. Continued.

JANUARY FEB MARCH. (

0- ,

0- 0-

s t .

I

)

i 10 - , 10 - l 10 -

si E .I l T -

y '

1o 20 - P e

{o 20 - -

'{ Ea go - ,

s O _

(

30 - 4 30 30 [

40 .,- .i> - - .i. 40 3 6' 't ... ...i... . . ... .i.. 40 ,,,, ,,, ,,,,.,, ,,, ,, ,.,,

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1) Dissolved Oxygen (mg/I) Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

JUNE w APRIL MAY O 0- 0- .

oo 0- . _

i I -

~

s 10 3 10 - '

10 - _ , - '

l .

n r

- i< T -

8 6

g. 20 .

2 3

{ 20 s g 20 -

o -

O _

g -

e

,i O I -

i - 8 I 30 - 30 - i 1 30 - '

i 40 A0 t'ss'?st* '6i

-9 ,,,,...g. .g... ...g... ...g

.,. 6 aitls 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 t' 8 to 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/I)

DissoW Oxygen (mM hW gge M Figure 2-7. Monthly mean dissolved oxygen profiles for the McGuire Nuclear Station background zone in 1992 (...)

and 1993 (-).

\

ST SEPTEMBER 0- . 0- '

0-

s -

r to- ," 10 [ ,

10 - ,'

~ '

s al E -

E t g -

s g 20- ,' p g 20{ ,'  %, 20 -

o u o -

i 8 :s s .

30 - i 30- 30 - '

~

40 C

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 40 0

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 43 ',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,

0 2 4 6 8 10- 12 14 Dissolved Oxygen (mga) Dissolved Oxygen (mga) Dissolved Oxygen (mga)

NOVEMBER DECEMBER w OCTOBER 0

h V3 o_ 0-7 ,

r .

8 ,

,o 10 10 - 10 - , 7 r -

E E - 8 5 .'

20 - e 20 ,

o I ,

a ..- a  : ,  :

30 30 30 - 7 40 40 ... ...g.......g..... ... .,

40 . . . ... ... . . ... ..-. ... ... ... ... ... ... ...,

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8, 10 12 14 0 2 6 8 10 12 14 Dissolved Oxygen (mga) GssoW Oxygen (mga)

Dissolved Oxygen (mg4)

(

Figure 2-7. Continued.

i N

_ _ _ _ _ _ _-_ _ _ . _ _ ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . -

O 8

O 240 24e ,

E Somol (n o Loca t ton e i so,,, a t.o Loe. t ton e

  • 9 El T 'l . '? '? 8.' 9 Y  ? ? ) 1 1) '? '.s jis , 9 73 9
  • m 23e j t e e a 1

- 23e  : 1 I }

l

! 225 E

V

! 225!

E w 22e

(e w 22e -

e ~

  • c rJ c

. v. ;

  • j i 2ie : I
  • 21e i
  • TEr1P (deg O TEM' C de o O 3 W a'5  : tu zes  :
8 JAN 93  : 2 FEB 93 M

E_

28e i

,,,,........... ..................... .. .. ........ .. ,.................................... . . ......... ,,i as se as * *e se es e s to is 2e a se as +e as se es e s se is me Dtstance from Cowan s Ford Do m ( t m) Dte ten ce from Couen. Fo r d Dom ( k m) tJ da o

24 24e ,

3 Sempttag Lo c a t to n e i Serrpsing Loc e t ton s

! Y '? 7? ?

E!  ? '1 '? '?'5' c  ?  ?  ? .? ) '.5 c ' V *?

5 E 22s i

E 225 -

E' 5 e f

-m E

-m  : o se c c fe 32ts j 321s

[ 9 a

= 2, e E

  • o

> ts.

E A -

o o TEt1P ( dog O

-  : TEM' ( des O -  :

W 25 -

tu 2es  : /

8 t1AR 93  : I 6 AFR 93 m i . m i w

195 e

lM

' ' ' 's ' ' 'is' ' ' 'is' ' '2e' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 's' ' ' ' 'a's' ' ' 'a's' ' s' 'e' ' ' ' 'e's' ' ' 'se ' e' s' ' ' 's' ' ' ' 's'e' 'is'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ss

' '2e s as as 4e 4s se Dts ton e. from Cowans Fo r d Do m ( k m)

Dte tone. from Cowan e Ford Do m ( k m)

Figure 2-0 Monthly reservoir-wide temperature isotherms for Lake Norman in 1993.

,r~N ( .

\ N %s,.

24e a, _

Samp i in a Loco L ton e

~

Samo i tn a Lo c o t to n e _

?

11 1? if 1s,9 9 6,9 72 es h T '.' '? '.8 18

4 9 '.' 77 E2 E  : E 2* N -%

- 22e  : 4 43 w 22e ^ te N e _-w ta o2is :

e -

f4 e 2is  : H 0 **

h 4 h ,,

2

E

,,) TEM' ( de o 0 -

w res TEr1P ( dag O w 2m .

3 1 JLN 93

3 rgy 93 5

,,, e e is is se us se as 4e as es sa e s se is me as se 35 g g se es t,4 Dtetence from Cowen a Ford Do m ( t m) Dietocce from Couen e Ford Do m ( t m) ta w

24e 240 _

Sempttng Lo c o t te n s 2 Sempi ta g Loce t ton s E

'? '5 c ' ?  ?  ? ?

)  ? '.' '? '?c'  ?  ?  ? ?

)  ? '.' '.5

~

V #

2 2'*

e

!W#V

~2s -

V # -2e C *'*

E 225 IV E:2s . __. ~

26- - ~ 24 5 Ne 2 _ s2e E'

- ::re ~~ 2* 2,Q w 22e W -%

e M *" n e 52< _" $

24 %

0 21 s - 19 [ O21s --y --

ge- N a - 86-- s -

O

, 2ie 2

]ee o

3 2ie #'

1 m'g 8 e -

1 TEt1P ( deg O e -

,*I TEM' C de a O  :

w res was - ~

4 ALG 93 E 7 JUL 93  :

,e, m .

N 2s se as e 4s se ss e, , , , s, , , , ,t o is me ss se as 4e 4s se ss e s is is 2e Dtetene. from Couane Ford Da m ( k m) Ot. tone. from Cowans Fo r d Do m ( t m)

Figure 2-8. Continued.

m ,.-~

<gs ,, ~.

(V s V (

v' s

2a 5 Somp t tn g Lo c a t to n s

S mo t (n o Loco t ton e 238 E j g i,i .i ip 1,s 199 9 67 y e,e h I .' 9 Y i' . ' T T  ? ?

^" g 22e  :

r# / _

o 6 225 E 22s E E

E

- = =

2e Q m g e

~

~

o 2is e 26

,o2is :

L .*  : 22 c

r y 21e o

W ~

T,

'T N s '* s'e,T TEr1P t oog O TEtP ( de 8 O -.

10 res  :

G ms [A 6 OCT 93

8 SEP 93 2ee 3 )
N m

,....i ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  • *s se es

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a e a te is 2e se as .e .s se en e s se is me 2s se as Dtstence f r o m Co w e n.s Fo rd Do m ( n m) Dte ten ce from Cowene Fo r d Dom ( t m) tu da tO 2*e 240 ,

Sempiing La c e t to n e Semp t ta g Loce t ton e i E j *

'.'  ? '.' c' ? *?  ? ?

} t .' '? '..'?  ?  ? ?

=  : w.  ; ,7

- = 5 f c e 3 \ l -

m  : I o E 2:s - E 22s -

E' 5 , $ h

-m 4 1 _m  :

e  : ,

e  :

0 21 s

[ 8 Otis {

s  : .2  : f s1 3 8

  • 21 f a

zio TErP (deg O _

$e  :

e TEr1P ( deg O Le 25 -

id 2es

- 2 NOV 93  : 2 DEC 93

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,n. .......,

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,s e s to t 2e 2s se as e 4s se ss ,,,,,,,,,,,,,o,,,,15 e s t 2e s 3e 3G e 4s Ee Es Ots tence from Cowane Ford Dom (n m) Otstone. from Cowan s Fo r d Do m ( n m)

Figure 2-8. Continued.

F k.

O O 24e M_ _

Sampi taa Lace t tone l 2 Sampi tne Loca t ton e i 9 '.'l 9 7 '8 t ' T T 7 Y h I V V V 18 t '9 '? 7 ?

h V

.. - 22e -

22e -

- 5

. 1 G 225 -

E 225 J-5 5 5 5 -

- me -

w 22e  :

c e

32is E

.3 21s i s -

se s o 0 > 21e - ne

> 2? e

- DO ( mg/s ) I i I DO (mg/s)

W 2es wm  : *

2 FEB 93
8 JAN 93 m i tee i

,... .................... ........ .... .. ... .....i i e es as e e se es e a to is 2e as w as 4e en e s se is me 2s se D te ten ce from Couan e Ford Do m ( t m) Dte ten c e from Cowens Fo r d Dom ( t m) ta b

tA 240 2*e _

i Semp t tn g Loce t. ton e

_I Semp t ta g La c e t to n e

"  ? Y 4 72 ?

) 8

'.'  ? '8 '8 t ' ?  ?  ? ? ) T V t' *?

2= 8 238  : -4

i. .g o -
E 22s  :

E 2:s 5 5 5 $~

- me  :

w 22.  :

e  :

e S ats i o 21s E [ (

a  : .>  :

(

) I

  • 21e 5

$ 2ie E g - i e -

00 (mg/I)

DQ ( fng/I) - -

W 26 : W 285  :

8 MAR 93 2 5 APR 93 2

=  : .

2ee  :

9 ti n t iit o s e a nis s e si n e r e e n s t e n s e n s is e s s e s ie n e s si n n e s s e s, g,g mineransesnienneinsioniennistinatimentestinese,inveien, gg e 5 le 15 2e lE 30 35 de 45 Be GG e 5 to 16 2e 26 38 35 4 4 Se 56 Dte ton c. f r o m Cowan . For d Do m ( 1 m) 01.tonc. from Cowan. Fo r d Dom C i m)

Figure 2-9. Monthly reservoir-wide dissolved oxygen isopleths for Lake Norman in 1993.

, , ,. e- e-- a +w de w w11 m- P ee-+ 7 P- w ' - - - - 'M*+--W-' ' - - - - " - - - - - - - - - - - -

s3 em y-m l

\j l f \

p

(

\,_//

N 'L 2'e ,

se ,,

3 Somo i tn a Lo c a t to n e i Sampi ta a Locottone h I 8! '? 7 18 t 'T 'l 7 ? $ 9 'l '? \818' t '? '? 7 ?

E 2:s

'] 6 [E 225 Q

N h

^ ,,_,,, 'N 7

E E

vm 3

  • v 22e  : 8' -

^

c c i:: l e

N i:: :

o ln &'1r 00 ( mg/t ) DO ( mg /t )

W" -

td 2e5 -

5 3 r1AY 93 3 1 JLN 93 m i eas 3

~

,ii... . ... ............... . ,.... .. ... ... ..... ,. ........ ...... ........ .... ..si . ... .... .. ,i e e te is me as as as e e se ss e s to is 2e :s 3e 3s .e +s es ss Dtstence from Cowen e Fo r d Do m ( t m) Die ten c e from Cowen e Fo r d Do m C t m) ta b

A 248 24e ,

E Semp t ta g Loco t ton e i Semp t ta g Loce t ton e

!  ? '! '? '? $s t '?  ?  ? ? }  ? 'l '? '? t'  ?  ?  ? ?

2_ ;m z_ o r a si5 h y;*

s e

0 2is }

x C  %[8  %

)P F

s c

0 215 21e i

p

" 2ie w e s

2 DO ( mg/l) -  : DO ( mg /I )

W ms f Id W  ;

7 JUL 93 4 ALG 93 m : .

2ee E

,,5 e

,rrr1,,,eae>>>ssssenieiniisieitenniini.eieerinnnii

5 to 16 29 25 30 35 e e Se 65

$95 0'''''o'15 5 t 2e IE 30 35 40 45 Se 55 Dtetonce f r o m Cowan e Ford Do m ( t m) Dts ton c e from Cowan Ford Dom C t m)

Figure 2-9. Continued.

\ s (g y . -: e; i

[ ,

I

  • 94 saa i
Sampi tn o Lace t ton e Semp t ta a Loce t. ton e 5 g i! i $? T is.9 4 4? 7/ y } f '.' i? 55 eS9 4 '? 9 ?

~" V

~"

i t

p j~

-m -

y)

  • N(.) v '/ ( >

e w zas -

, o1 c c -

3 218  :

Y 321s ? / ,

21 8 2t e DO C mg/I)

DO C mg/s ) - .

td M  : / Id nos  ;

6 OCT 93
8 SEP 93 see 3 ree 3

- i

,............ ....... ................................. ,............... ... ... . ............ .......... 1,.

e as e s se is se :n se as 4e e se ss e s se is se as se as e se Dtatence f rom Cowen e Ford Dem ( k m) D te t.en c e from Cowen e Fo r d Dem ( t m)

N b

ut 2*G 24e ,

Semp t tn g Lac e t ton e 3 Somp t ta g Loce t. Lon s y y M e ip y ?

El e iy if if is 7 , y ep g i,i if is j , 9 47 n ne . j n zw i

.  : a .  :

E =s - T E.22s

E E-  : em

-m  : a c c  !

3 21 s j 321s j s -

~

$ 2:e

  • 2to {

l DO ( mg/I) 3 DO t mg /I) w= -

2 IOV 93 w res  :

2 DEC 93

~

=

~

m ,v . see

, t f i t t t t t t t f li t t i 19 51 t 10 E 19 9 9 8 9 919 9 9 9 91119 9 8 319 9 3 t i t t 91 1 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

99g e s is is me as se as e 4 se ss l e , , , s, , , , ,s,e, , , ,is a z a is e e se ss Die ton es from Couan e Fo r d Do m ( t m) Ot. Lone. from Cowen. Fo r d Do m ( t m)

Figure 2-9. Continued.

I

_ . _ _ - - - . _ _ - . _ . - - - - - _ _ - . _ _ - - . - . , - - . , - - - - . - - _ , - - , - - , , . - - - . - . . - c .

N -

. NN w

i 244 2de i LAKE NDRriAN STRIPED BASS HABITAT LAKE NOT1AN STRIPED BASS HABITAT 2:s 23s

-l 9 'l  ? 'F 'Eid ? -67 7 8e 9 ') '? '.5 'St ' 'F *? 77 ? j

.i

^ d$fy

^"E ., a(~ig)) esa @N E 22s i

-ar .  ;..,

" -.-.. ^

a E 22s 22e ~ghkkb ..

- 22e "MMN '

e . .

e 32'5 32'8 o

hyg;gewm

?d?@ E Y
p: .

m.

> 21e ..: RQqw d4 > 21e

-r ac M nN . ::g ;y - ' ~~ b) M 30 JUN 93 [ 7 JUL 93 m ':$h6"eF

gyp 2ee .

e e is is no a se as e de se as e a 1e is se as se as 4e 4s se as Dietence from Cowen e Ford Do m ( t m) Dte ten ce from Cowen e Ford Do m ( t m) w Ch 2e, 24e ,

i LACE tCRrW4 STRIPED BASS HABITAT E LAKE NORr1AN STRIPED BASS HABITAT

  • e ' *2 72 **

)  ? '1 '? '.' ' *c'  ? */ 7' ? ) V '? ',5 . *?

m i jg ~*

I

! "$4P E E =y  :- '

E 225 -

26 A 5

~

E C

-m i

~ w 22e  : 26 g c  : c 2 215 { 3215 5 s - .,  :

21e h f 21e ;

I e l e  ::j #  :

l Cpos f:1 fj ses  !

2 14 JUL 93 - 22 JUL 93 m i m i

~

f .

,,,,.. ........... . .... ... .. ... . ... ....... . ,,, i .... .... .............. . inii .... . .....,,,,,

e 6 10 16 2e 25 30 35 43 45 6e 65 e 5 le 15 28 25 3e 36 40 45 50 55 Dtetanc. fr o m Cowan e Ford Dom ( t nu Dte ton e. from Cowens Ford Dom (6 m)

Figure 2-10. Striped bass habitat (temperatures s 26 C and dissolved oxygen 2: 2.0 mg/L in Lake Norman in June, July, August and September 1993.

- F ' t -

<l ,  ; , L s , s t s e s

? 3

? 5 3 t

e f

M' 9 . s) 9 e)

. em t i

s m

? G U

. t  ? P E

i k

T A

A

. s(

T A f S t

i s(

a m

i m

T 9 . T 4 n I 1 . o I 2 i o B ?+

A

.D 4

B ?*

A i

n

e. D .

H .

d H i m

d S r S n r S 9 #'8 .

. s o S ? i so A -

. aF A s i

aF B, . B ' n e e s

. i DS 'e . e sn D 't t 3 n -

E .

. a E ' s i e P '.

I '

u P ?

I '

n w

R '

o R i

so T

S

. aC T s

e 2C S n i

P  ?

e m e m

. n N ' .

2 o N ' i 2 o A A

~

. i t . r M i r i

F f R i f O 6 O s.c i

2 . s N

i

- . i e N i i

E Y Y c i n E i n n I

A i

eet s

K A

i o ta t

L .

e L s s

9 . T n

. i i t

. aD e t

sO

. s n

.E [1 :5 .-  : :i:E 2 : . ,. 5k  ::- .{:i::: i e

e ' s s s e ,e e s e s e 2

' = 2 2

a z

i 2

i t N 8

8 2

4 2 " " 2 2

2 2

1 2

i 2 m m 5, i

_ --E w c 0, s

  • e U } E*Ew cO s8 eE -

v

, s s e

d ns y ,

,  ? R i

i wF 3 , e) sm 3 i

n e) sm y

- 9 ,

, 9 i G , t

? P t

T AN U T E i

.n 5

(

  • e(m A '

A ,

A S 4 T ,

T i

i m ,

I 4 ,

I 8 i o -

B? ,

D A 6 H

, *D B A  ?*

i i

i e

d H i d

S y , r i r

S f, so S i A

aF S  ? i 5 3

F o

B ,

B A  % i i

i e e ' .

Ds ,

sn s i

e s d E i ,

e D E '.

i i 3 n e P p ,

w P 5 i e u .

I s R

o I '

i so w n -

aC R _ .

i t

T S

T i 2C n N

, S i o

mC i

m N

A

? ,

e m o N  ? i i e 2 o t

t r A 1 2 i

i r . -

R 2 ,

f t R i f 0 O ,

P i

, s ie O ,i i

s 1

, 1 ,

- ie

^d F

9 ,

c i

c 2 E

K

, n E . 2 6 i i

n e r

A ,

ee s

K A

i i e s e u L t t t

e L i

i g 9 i e i

, t i F aD ii, sD i

e

@ :E - [:i:33: .,e p~  ::- ,( : [:i:::

,a e ' = s e s e ,

e* s e s

" r 2

2 = m 2 i

z 1

2 N m 2 2

t 2

e:

2 n m ,,, ,

- E'E- ,3s$eU }E ;c - e3s$oU .

a titaQ

t.

t L

b

'L CHAPTER 3 PHYTOPLANKTON INTRODUCTION ,

Phytoplankton population parameters were monitored in 1993 in accordance with the NPDES  ;

permit for McGuire Nuclear Station. The objectives of the phytoplankton section for the Lake ,

Norman Maintenance Monitoring Program are to:

1. Describe quarterly pattems of phytoplankton standing crop and species I composition throughout Lake Norman; and '
2. Compare phytoplankton data collected during this study (February, May, August, November 1993) with historical data collected during these same months.

Previous studies on Lake Norman have reported considerable spatial and temporal variability in phytoplankton standing crops and taxonomic composition (Duke Power Company 1976, 1985; Menhinick and Jensen 1974; Rodriguez 1982). Rodriguez (1982) classified the lake as oligo-mesotrophic based on phytoplankton _ abundance, distribution, and. taxonomic composition.

METHODS AND MATERIALS Quarterly phytoplankton sampling was conducted at Locations 2.0, 5.0, 8.0, 9.5,11.0,13.0, 15.9, and 69.0 in Lake Norman (see map oflocations in Chapter 1, Figure 1-1). Duplicate composite grabs from 0.3,4.0, and 8.0 m (i.e., the euphotic zone) were taken at all locations.

Sampling was conducted on 23 February,25 May,12 August, and 30 November 1993.

Phytoplankton density, biovolume and taxonomic composition were determined for samples collected at Locations 2.0,5.0,9.5,11.0, and 15.9; chlorophyll a concentrations and seston dry and ash free dry weights were determined for samples from all locations. Chlorophyll a and total phytoplankton densities and biovolumes are used in determining phytoplankton

' standing crop. Field sampling methods and laboratory methods used for chlorophyll a, seston dry weights, secchi depth, and population identification and enumeration were identical to those used by Rodriguez (1982). Data collected in 1993 were compared with corresponding data from quarterly monitoring beginning in August 1987.

3-1

s , .

'k.'.

A one way ANOVA was performed on chlorophyll a concentrations, phytoplankton densities and'seston dry and ash free dry weights by quarter. This was followed by a Duncan's Multiple Range Test to determine which location means were significantly different. The j significance level of comparison among means was 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Chlorophyll a j Chlorophyll a concentrations from all locations except Location 69.0 ranged from about 5 mg/m3 to 14 mg/m3 ni 1993 (Table 3-1; Figure 3-1). Chlorophyll a concentrations observed  ;

at the uplake riverine Location 69.0 were more variable; ranging from 1.9 mg/m3i n May to 23.5 mg/m3 in August, the highest value recorded since the Maintenance Monitoring Program was begun in 1987. However, even this value is well below the N. C. Water Quality Standard of 40 mg/m3 for chlorophyll. Overall, the range of chlorophyll a values observed in Lake Norman in 1993 was similar to that observed in 1991 and 1992 and continue to place O

this reservoir in the mesotrophic range.

V Chlorophyll a values at the riverine Location 69.0 were significantly lower than all other i i

f locations in February and May and significantly higher than all other locations in August  ;

based on the results of Duncan's Multiple Range Test (Table 3-2). The riverine zone of a reservoir is subject to- fluctuations in inflow depending on meteorological conditions (Thornton 1992). Typically, algal production would be suppressed during periods of high flow, due in part to washout; production would increase during periods oflow flow when retention time is greater and washout is decreased. Apparently, the former conditions prevailed in February and May and the latter conditions prevailed in August. Chlorophyll a t concentrations at the transitional zone Location 15.9 were significantly higher than other locations in November of 1993. The transitional zone is typically the area cf a reservei with highest algal production (Thornton 1992). Few other consistent patterns in chloroptiyll a j concentrations were observed in 1993. In general, chlorophyll a concentrations observed at

, Mixing Zone Locations (2.0 and 5.0) were similar to those observed at other main body locations in Lake Norman.

Lakewide, chlorophyll a values for 1993 were similar to 1992 and 1991 but viere higher than  ;

)

those observed in 1987 through 1990 (Figure 3-2). Lake means of chlorophyl! in 1991 and 3-2 i

i i

i O

cQ 1992 by quarter were in the 8 to 10 mg/m3 range compared with the 2 to 7 mg/m3 range observed in 1987 through 1989. This increase in the lake wide average by quarter appears to be due to increased chlorophyll concentrations from Location 13.0 downlake to Location 2.0 (Figure 3-3). The greatest increase occurred in February, May, and August.

Total Abundance Total phytoplankton densities ranged from a low of 793 units /ml at Location 15.9 in February to a high of 4373 units /ml at Location 11.0 in May (Table 3-3, Figure 3-1). Total phytoplankton biovolumes ranged from a low of 280 mm3 /m3 at Location 15.9 in February to a high of 1589 :can3/ m3 at Location 9.5 in May. Total phytoplankton densities in the Mixing Zone (Locations 2.0 and 5.0) were significantly lower than other lake locations during May and November (Table 3-4). Total densities at Location 15.9 was always significantly different from the Mixing Zone. During February and May the separation i

between the Mixing Zone locations was similar to that of the chlorophylls (Table 3-2). In general, trends in phytoplankton densities parallel trends in chlorophyll a concentrations.

- Seston 3

Seston dry weights in 1993 ranged from a low of 2.26 mg/l at Location 2.0 in August to a high of 10.65 mg/l at Location 69.0 in November (Figure 3-1). Seston ash free dry weights ranged from a low of 0.75 mg/l at Loc::. .a 8.0 and 11.0 in November to a high of 3.05 mg/l at Location 69.0 in August. Seston dry weights were significantly higher at uplake Location ,

69.0 than other locations in May, August and November (Table 3-5), possibly due to allocthonous inputs of sediment and high algal abundance. Ash free dry weights were significantly higher at Location 69.0 than other locations in August (Table 3-6). These l

weights did not correspond well with chlorophyll and densities indicating varying inputs of allochthonous and autochthonous materials. No consistent pattern of seston weights was observed at the downlake locations. i l

i Secchi Depths Secchi depths were generally lowest at uplake Location 69.0 due to the pr:viously mentioned higher amounts of suspended materials (Table 3-1). Secchi depths ranged from a low of 0.5

( m at Location 69.0 in November to a high of 2.38 m at Location 2.0 in August.

3-3 l

x i' .

\

Community Composition Eleven classes comprising 104 genera and 262 taxa of phytoplankton were identified from samples collected in Lake Norman in 1993. The distribution of taxa within classes was as follows: Chlorophyceae (Green algae), 132; Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms), 49; Chrysophyceae, 21; Haptophyceae,1; Xanthophyceae, 2; Cryptophyceae, 7; Myxophyceae (Blue-green algae),23; Euglenophyceae,9; Dinophyceae,14; Chloromonadophyceae,3; and L 1 Unidentified taxon (see DPC 1992 for species list). Two new taxa, green algae in the l

desmid order, (Tetraedron lobulatum v. crassum Prescott and Staurastrum gladiosum l

Prescott), were identified in 1993 which had not previously been recorded in the Maintenance Monitoring Program.

Species Composition and Seasonal Succession {

Species composition in February differed slightly from past years. Cryptophytes numerically dominated phytoplankton assemblages in February due to the abundance of Ahodomonas minuta which comprised over 28.0% of the total density at all locations. Rhodomonas minuta is the most frequent numerical dominant observed in Lake Norman although typically

)

not in February when diatoms generally dominate (Duke Power Company 1992). Diatoms were second in abundance in February due primarily to Melostra ambigua which comprised more than 15.0% of the total biovolume at a!! locations except 9.5. Melostra ambigua, formerly called Melostra italica, typically exhibits a large peak in' abundance in late winter /carly spring (February) followed by a rapid decline prior to the onset of stratification.

In February, the Chrysophyceae density (Kephyrion spp.) at Loc.15.9 and Dinophyceae biovolume (Peridinium umbonatum) at Loc. 2.0 were important.

L L

Phytoplankton species composition in May was dominated by cryptophytes and diatoms much like in February. Fragilaria crotonensis was an important component of the biovolume (at all locations except 5.0) and Achnanthes spp. was important in terms of density at Locations 9.5 and 11.0. Diatoms and cryptophytes were numerically codominant in the mixing zone, diatoms were numerically dominant at Loc. 9.5 and 11.0 and chrysophytes were numerically dominant at Loc.15.9. Rhodomonas minuta was the numerical dominant at all locations except Location 9.5.

3-4 1

~. - __ ..

ye  ;

As in past years, the phytoplankton community in August consisted of a diverse assemblage dominated by chlorophyceae (green algae) species. Green algae were numerically dominant at all locations except Location 15.9 where diatoms were dominant. A small desmid,  !

Cosmarium asphaerophorum v. strigosum, was the numerical dominant comprising more than 20% of the total density at down lake lacustrine locations (2.0,5.0 and 9.5). Small  !

coccoid greens were also important downlake and they were numerically dominant at -

midlake Location 11.0. In terms of biovolume, dinoflagellates (Peridinium spp.) were ,

dominant at Locations 5.0,9.5 and 11.0 in August with diatoms dominant at Locations 2.0 l and 15.9. The phytoplankton assemblage at the transition zone Location 15.9 in August was quite different than other locations, it was dominated in numbers and biovolume by a diatom, Synedra spp., and also had higher numbers of blue green algae. Blue-green algae comprised about 15% of the density at Location 15.9 in August compared with about 5% of the total density at all other locations. Typically, the highest numbers cf blue green algae are observed at Location 15.9 in August (DPC 1989,1990,1991,1992).

In November, except for Location 15.9, diatoms were the dominant class due primarily to the abundance of the large filamentous diatom Melastra ambigua. Also, Melosira ambigua comprised more than 50% of the biovolume at Locations 2.0,5.0 and 9.5 and more than 35% ,

of the biovolume at Location 11.0. Melosira ambigua is typically most abundant during the 1_

unstratified periods in Lake Norman (Duke Power Company 1989,1990,1991,1992. The phytoplankton community at the uplake transition zone location 15.9 was different from the other locations. It was dominated by cryptophytes, numerically by Rhodomonas minuta and in biovolume by Cryptomonas ovata.

l In 1993, other species comprising more than 10% of the total density or biovolume were coccoid greens, unidentified flagellates, Nitzschia agnita and in terms of density and )

Cryptomonas erosa, Cryptomonasovata, and Melostra varians in terms of biovolume. All major taxa observed in 1993 have been common in previous years.

l i

1 l

l l

3-5 i l

t r

i i

FUTURE STUDIES No changes are planned for the phytoplankton portion of the Lake Norman maintenance

'4 monitoring program.

SUMMARY

i Chlorophyll a, seston weights and dry weights were most often significantly different at Location 69.0 than other locations in 1993. This location is more riverine  !

in nature and is subject to flucuations in flow. Few significant differences were  :

observed between parameters sampled in the mixing zone and other locations in 1993. -

Chlorophyll a concentrations at all locations during 1993 were within historical -

ranges and in the mesotrophic range. They were generally higher than those observed during 1987 through 1990 but were similar to those observed in 1991 and 1992.

  • Total phytoplankton densities and biovolumes remained similar to those observed in  !

previous years.

  • Phytoplankton taxonomic composition during 1993 was similar to that observed l during the same months of 1992. Diatoms, green algae and cryptophytes were the most numerically abundant classes of algae observed. Diatoms and cryptophytes generally dominated the phytoplankton biovolumes in all months except August when the phytoplankton community consisted of a diverse assemblage dominated by small green algae. Dinoflagellates were sporadically dominant in terms of biovolume at some locations during all months except November. Blue-green algae were never

^

dominant part at any location or time in 1993.

  • Major taxa observed in 1993 were similar to those observed in 1992. Rhodomonas minuta was the most frequent numerical dominant during 1993 as in previous years.

I Mclosira ambigua dominated the algal biovolume at most locations during the '

unstratified periods (February and November).

l t  :

3-6 J I

-. ., - . .~,,I

L i

1 P

$ LITERATURE CITED l 4

Duke Power Company.1976. McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage. '6th rev. Volume 2. Duke Power Company, j

( Charlotte, NC.

l r

Duke Power Company.1985. McGuire Nuclear Station,316(a) Demonstration. Duke j Power Company, Charlotte, NC. j i

Duke Power Company.1988. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program: 1987 l

summary.

Duke Power Company.1989. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program:

1988 summary.

}

Duke Power Company.1990. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program: $

1989 summary.  ;

l Duke Power Company.1991. Lake Norman maintenance a nitoring program:

1990 summary. j n

U Duke Power Company.1992. Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program:

1991 summary. j Menhinick, E. F. and L. D. Jensen.1974. Plankton populations, p. 120-138 In L. D.  !

Jensen (ed.). Environmental responses to thermal discharges from Marshall Steam Station, Lake Norman, NC. Electric Power Research Institute, Cooling Water  :

Discharge Project (RP-49) Report No. I1. Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore MD. 235 ]

p. 1 I

i North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of  ;

Environmental Management (DEM), Water Quality Section. 1991.1990 Algal Bloom .

Report Rodriguez, M. S.1982. Phytoplankton, p. 154-260 in J. E. Hogan and W. D. Adair I (eds.). Lake Norman summary, Technical Report DUKEPWR/82-02 Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC. 460 p.

3-7

- _ - .~ ._. ....- - . . .. .-. . - . - . . -. _.- _

l l

l Thornton, K. W., B. L. Kimmel, F. E. Payne.1990. Reservoir Limnology. John Wiley j and Sons, Inc. N. Y. 246 pp.

i O

l s

i r

b

, 3-8

. . , . . . + - , - . . -.. ,, , ---,,,, .-, , , , . _ . _ . . . , , - - . . _ . _ , , _ _ - . ,

Table 3-1. Mean chlorophyll a concentrations (mg/m') and secchi depths recorded during 1993 from locations in Lake Norman, NC. <

Lake Norman Chlorophyll a - 1993 FEB MAY AUG NOV Location Mean Mean Mean Mean 2.0 6.83 5.80 5.88 5.55 5.0 6.67 6.02 7.11 4.86 8.0 7.18 8.54 11.61 4.91 9.5 6.44 10.05 13.39 7.52 11.0 7.06 9.84 8.67 6.01 i 13.0 6.39 12.42 7.00 5.01 15.9 4.60 11.09 13.73 9.15 69.0 2.85 1.92 23.50 3.84 Secchi Depths - 1993 Location FEB MAY AUG NOV ,

2.0 1.74 1.95 2.38 1.25 5.0 1.46 1.95 1.81 1.05 8.0 1.53 2.20 2.16 1.28 i 9.5 2.01 1.80 1.80 1.17 11.0 0.95 1.80 2.23 1.36 13.0 0.79 1.70 1.22 1.06 15.9 0.67 1.60 1.78 1.52 ,

69.0 0.85 0.90 1.34 0.50 i

i O 3-9

[N- Table 3-2. Duncan's Multiple Range Test on Chlorophyll a concentrations in Lake Norman, NC during 1993. (Means connected by lines are not significantly different.)

February Location 69.0 15.9 13.0 9.5 5.0 2.0 11.0 8.0 Mean 2.85 4.60 6.39 6.44 6.67 6.83 7.06 7.18 May Location 69.0 2.0 5.0 8.0 11.0 9.5 15.9 13.0 Mean 1.92 5.80 6.02 8.54 9.84 10.04 11.09 12.42 August Location 2.0 13.0 5.0 11.0 8.0 9.5 15.9 69.0 Mean 5.88 7.00 7.11 8.67 11.61 13.40 13.73 23.50 O

U

) November Location 69.0 5.0 8.0 13.0 2.0 11.0 9.5 15.9 .

Mean 3.84 4.86 4.91 5.01 5.55 6.01 7.52 9.15 I

l i

\

3-10 1

I Table 3-3. Total phytoplankton densities and biovolumes from samples col'lected in Lake Norman, NC in February, May, August and November 1993.

Total Phytoplankton - Lake Norman - 1993 Density Locations Class 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 Mean FEB 1507 1673 1765 1702 793 1488 MAY 2045 1824 3766 4372 3612 3124 AUG 1638 2230 2881 1445 3742 2387 NOV 937 1138 1431 1451 1614 1314 Biovolume 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 Mean FEB 671 465 490 577 280 497 MAY 797 652 1589 1391 1411 1168 O AUG NOV 423 773 786 536 1387 955 1050 722 1236 489 976 695 O 3-11

Table 3-4. Duncan's Multiple Range Test on Phytoplankton Densities in Lake Norman, NC during 1993. (Means connected by lines are not significantly different.)

February Location 15.9 2.0 5.0 11.0 9.5 Mean 793 1507 1673 1703 1765 t

May Location 5.0 2.0 15.9 9.5 11.0 Mean 1824 2045 3612 3766 4373 August Location - 11.0 2.0 5.0 9.5 15.9 Mean 1445 1639 2230 2882 3742 C November Location 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 Mean 938 1138 1431 1451 1615 ,

3 6

f i

U 3-12 i

- - - , , - , , , , - -- --n,.. . , , - - - . - , . - . - - - - -r--

1 l

f Table 3-5 . Duncan's Multiple Range Test on Seston Dry and Ash Free Dry Weight concentrations in Lake Norman, NC during 1993.

l Dry Weight February Location 2.0 9.5 5.0 8.0 11.0 13.0 69.0 15.9 Mean 2.67 2.74 2.96 3.08 3.85 4.32 4.70 4.99 May Location 8.0 9.5 11.0 5.0 13.0 2.0 15.9 69.0 Mean 2.76 3.24 3.28 3.52 3.68 4.06 4.37 8.60 August Location 2.0 11.0 13.0 8.0 15.9 9.5 5.0 69.0 Mean 2.26 2.27 2.27 2.34 2.50 3.02 3.09 7.98 November location 15.9 11.0 2.0 8.0 5.0 13.0 9.5 69.0 Mean 3.41 3.41 3.50 4.00 4.49 4.74 4.80 10.65 Ash Free Dry Weight February Location 9.5 69.0 5.0 2.0 8.0 11.0 13.0 15.9 Mean 0.82 0.90 1.00 1.01 1.06 1.08 1.13 1.21 May Location 5.0 8.0 2.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 13.0 69.0 Mean 1.24 1.37 1.51 1.58 1.69 1.71 1.85 1.98 August Location 13.0 2.0 11.0 15.9 8.0 5.0 9.5 69.0 Mean 1.02 1.23 1.35 1.44 1.48 1.53 1.78 3.05 November Location 11.0 8.0 2.0 13.0 15.9 9.5 5.0 69.0 Mean 0.75 0.75 0.76 0.82 0.94 0.99 1.04 1.99 1

b 3-13

s m9/m3 No./mi 25 5,000 i A g

Chlorophyll a j Total Density a r 20 -

/ 4,000 ,e \

i p

? 'p.

i 16 -

j 3,000 -

4 , .A /-'

x

../\. o l

./

!/ -

'\. l s'l: *' j

,/

/t 10 -

  • \d

/ .9g 2,000 A,,, ' \. .

j ',- i -4 m

~ .

i f

.o,

'N.j# ,.-

  1. [ ~

. o. . . . . . k ,

l ...o e,....***....

S g* * . e. . . 6 o . , * *6 ;f., 1,000 so 0 oi e i e i 2 5 8 9.6 11 13 15.9 63 2 5 9.6 11 15.9 m9 mm3/m3 12 2,000 Dry Weight p Total Biovolume 10 -

l

.I 1,500 - t 's

~

e -

la* lp.  %--~

.s s: \

is:j 'l \ /*

i'! s./*

6  ;*

f 1,000 - p I .I A .G .

4 A ,g '

o'

,o.

c

,* h

.: J , s;.f r

. s. ,, A?-

, / ,, -

~s ~"

'l 500 .'*'

g- ~*g  %., f d "

~ "

,4,.

2 O

2 6 8 o' ' ' + i 9.5 11 13 16.9 69 2 6 9.5 11 15.9-Feb May Aug Nov c - + - -,1 - . . :. .

[ Figure 3-1. Chlorophyll a, dry weights, total densities and total biovolumes for locations in

( Lake Norman, North Carolina, in February, May, August, and November 1993.

3-14

N Chlorophyll a Lake Means by Year mg/m3 12 10 ^

-s...Y. .

- e.- " ~ ~w - -- - h 1.g. ,~. . ,--

8 -

~. . ' -a

~

O-6 ...... . A..s..

g.

. . -.....'.......O...s.

... s J -

...;.3 8

)

4 3 -x..- .-

_y ._+,

2 -

0 Feb May Aug Nov 1987g 1988 1989 __ s 1990.. e .

_ 4_

1991 1992 1993

_. u - --o - -A-Figure 3-2. Chlorophyll a, lake means by year samples were collected in Lake Norman, North Carolina, from August 1987 through November 1993.

3-15 1

/

%s J February May August

'5 November

'5 Loc. 7.0 e-e '

c Lo c. 6.0 A- - A O to -

to -

N A ,

10 -

10 .

n '

e  % - A C 5 4' '

' 5, s 4, s x _ .

,, A -

'6 e e s 6 6 6 'ui 6 6 s 6 6 6 i 8, 4 6 6 6 6 6 8i s 6 s 6 6 6 15 15 Loc. 8.0 C D 5 25 '

Loc. 9.5 a- - A -

40 10 A-e_

o ,s.s. 4 to i

50 .

~a 4 s 5 .

s g *

, , s -

'oi 4 6 s 6 s 6 '

i7 6 6 6 6 6 6 *i n 6 6 6 6 6 s s u u l

o. i *ii s 6 o, it .

j it .

Loc.11.0 C O '

s 8

\

Loc.13.0 A- - A ,. A to .

10 . #

10 -

10 to) e O. y -

,Y '

A s 5 h5 A #

5 5  % ,# , A - 4e ' S -

e6 0, ');,

6 h 6 6 6 6 8 li is 6 6 6 6 e ;, ,; g g j, v-

.3 ,, 4 0 [,

,, g 4 g g g, r 25 25 2$ 25 O- b O i a 2e -

20 o toe,15,9 c a 2o .

20 .

o Loc. 69.0 6- - a t g' 15 -

15 -

15 e

is g

, s '

10 to e -

A- 10 -

to k

, Ap o i

,s s i is s

o

. 5 -

Q h5 A i 5 s . 4 i

sg s 'A 4

, $,o . ,, , .

u u 30 n n 5

, .. n n .. n u

., .. ., n .. n n q',

3 Figure 3-3. Chlorophyll a concentrations (mg/m ) by location for samples collected in Lake Norman, North Carolina, from August 1987 through November 1993.

unito/mi UOMOIIY mm3/m3 BIO V Olu rT19 .

5,000 2,000 Mixing

[ Zone 4.000 -

Loo. 2 & 5 ,,,,, ,

2,000 - - -

0- O-Feb May Aug Nov Feb May Aug Nov 6,000 2,000 4,000 "

l 3,000 Loo. 9.5 '. coo ~~

  • j 2,000 .. l 1,000 5,000 O_EB

~.

Feb

.. l..

May Aug Nov 2,000 O _ -n Feb May Aug Nov ,

4,000 --

3,000 --

Loo.1 1.0 ,,000 "I, .

2,000 ~ . .

g Feb May Aug Nov Feb May Aug Nov 5,000 2,000 e,000 -

3.000 - ..'p.Y /,.

L o c.15. 9

~

I'I' '

2,000 -

.q. ],,_

', ~. -

g ,.

,,000 - .k 1 J..

0-f - 0 4,

u Baclliarlophyc e a e O Chlorophyceae CSIChrysophyceae l n Cryptophyceae O Myxophyceae  :] Dinophyceae l

O Other Figure 3-4. Class composition of phytoplankton from euphotic zone composite samples collected at locations in lake Nonnan, North Carolina, during 1993.

3-17

CIIAPTER 4 ZOOPLANKTON INTRODUCTION The objectives of the Lake Norman Maintenance Monitoring Program for zooplankton are to:

1. Describe quarterly pattems of zooplankton standing crops at selected locations on Lake Norman and
2. Compare zooplankton data collected during this study (February, May, August, and November 1993) with historical data collected for this Program during the period 1987-1991 for these same months.

Previous studies of Lake Norman zooplankton populations have demonstrated a bimodal seasonal distribution with highest recorded values occurring in spring and a less pronounced fall peak. Considerable spatial and year to year variability has been observed in zooplankton abundance in Lake Norman (Duke Power Company 1976,1985; Hamme 1982; Menhinick and Jensen 1974).

2 METHODS AND MATERIALS Duplicate 10 m to surface and bottom to surface net tows were taken at Locations 2.0,5.0, 9.5,11.0, and 15.9 in Lake Norman (Chapter 2, Figure 1-1) on February 23. May 25, August 12, and November 30, 1993. For discussion purposes the 10 m to surface tow samples will be referred to as eplimnetic samples and the bottom to surface net tow samples will be referred to as whole column samples. Locations 2.0 and 5.0 are defined as the Mixing Zone and Locations 9.5,110 and 15.9 are defined as Background locations. Field and laboratory methods for zooplankton standing crop analysis were the same as those reported in Hamme (1982). Zooplankton standing crop data from 1992 were compareii with corresponding data from quanerly monitoring begun in August 1987.

(

\

4-1

A one way ANOVA was performed 'on epilimnetic total zooplankton densities by quarter.

This was followed by a Duncan's Multiple Range Test to determine which location means were significantly different. The significance level of comparison among means was 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Total Abundance .

Lakewide, total zooplankton densities in both epilimnetic and whole column samples in 1993 i were highest in May and lowest in November (Table 4-1). Spring is historically the time of maximum zooplankton standing crop in Lake Norman (Hamme 1982). The greatest observed zooplankton densities in 1993 for eplimnetic samples were observed at Location 2.0 in February (115,300/m3) and for whole column samples were observed at Location 5.0 in May (132,600/m3). The lowest zooplankton densities for both eplimnetic and whole column samples were observed in November at Location 9.5 (16,000/m3 and 12,600/m3, respectively). The trend of increasing zooplankton population densities from downlake to h uplake observed in previous years was only evident in November of1993 (Figure 4-1).

Total zooplankton densities were generally greater in epilimnetic samples than in whole column samples in 1993 as in previous years (Duke Power Company 1988,1989,1990,1991 and 1992). This phenomenon is related to the ability of zooplankton to orient vertically in the water column in response to a variety of physical and chemical gradients and the distribution of food sources, primarily phytoplankton (Hinchinson 1967).

1 W

b v 4-2

l 7

Location Comparisons

- A one way ANOVA on total zooplankton densities in eplimnetic samples showed no consistent spatial pattem among locations in 1993 (Table 4-2). Zooplankton densities from Locations 2.0 and 9.5 were significantly higher than other locations in February, the month with the greatest differences in observed densities between locations. Total zooplankton  !

density at Location 9.5 was significantly higher than other locations in August. Both j zooplankton densities from Location 11.0 and 15.9 were significantly different from the lower lake locations in an increasing pattern moving uplake in November.

t Year to Year Comparisons Total zooplankton densities from eplimnetic samples collected during February, May, August and November of 1993 were generally within the range of those reported for these months in previous years (Figure 4-2). Major trends in epilimnetic zooplankton abundance included higher total zooplankton densities at Locations 2.0 and 9.5 in February than those observed since 1987. The November 1993 densities in the Mixing Zone were the lowest recorded

)

since 1987, while the highest densities occurred in the Mixing Zone in May during the same period. No consistent pattems were noted for the Background locations.

I r

Community Composition -

Fifty-seven zooplankton taxa have been identified in samples collected since the Lake Norman Maintenance Monitoring Program was initiated in August 1987 (Table 4-3). No new zooplankton taxa were identified in samples collected in 1993. Rotifers most often ,

dominated zooplankton assemblages in Lake Norman during 1993 as in previous years, followed by copepods (Table 4-1t Figure 4-3). Cladocerans were numerically dominant only at Location 2.0 in November in 1993. Rotifers were most consistently abundant lakewide  :

during the warmer months when they comprised an average 60.7% and 76.0% of the total .

density in eplimnetic tows in May and August, respectively. Copepods were second most ,

abundant during each sampling period except August when they comprised less than 10% of 4-3 i

e

-. - , . . . . r _. __ _ .. _ ,. ,, ,

- m the total density in epilimnetic samples at all locations. In November, rotifers exhibited increasing densities from downlake to uplake in both eplimnetic and whole water column samples,eg. 2,100/m3 at Location 2.0 to 47,500/m3 at Location 15.9 in eplimnetic samples.

This was the only month in 1993 in which a consistent downlake uplake trend ofincreasing rotifer densities occurred as had been observed in past years. Hamme (1982) found that the highest rotifer densities generally occurred at uplake locations.

l During February 1993 Polyarthra and Synchaeta were the major constituents of rotifer l populations. Keratella and Polyarthra were the dominant rotifers at all locations in May. l Conchiloides, Conochilus and Trichocercajoined Keratella as the most important rotifer taxa l in August of 1993. Conochilus was the overall dominant in August of 1993 at Location 15.9 )

l where it comprised more than 40% of the total density in both eplimnetic and whole column samples. Keratella and Polyarthra were again the major components of the rotifers in November. Major rotifer taxa observed in 1993 were also the most abundant rotifers observed in previous years (Duke Power Company 1988,1989,1990,1991,1992; Hamme 1982). .

Copepod populations were dominated by immature forms (primarily nauplii and cyclopoid

.copepodids with some calanoid copepodids) during all sampling periods of 1993 as was the j case in 1991. Mesocyclops spp. was the only major adult copepod taxon observed in 1993, .

comprising more than 5% of the total densities in the whole column samples at Location 9.5 l in May. No distinct spatial trend in copepod abundance was noted for samples collected in 1993 (Figure 4-3).

Bosmina was the most abundant cladoceran observed in samples collected in 1993, as in 1992 (Duke Power Company 1993) and in previous years (Hamme 1982). Bosmina ,

comprised more than 25% of the total zooplankton density in both epilimnetic and whole column samples at Location 2.0 in February. In November of 1993 as in 1992, Bosmina comprised more than 20% of the total density in whole column samples in the Mixing Zone. .

The only other major cladoceran taxa observed in 1993 was Bosminopsis deitersi at downlake locations 2.0,5.0 and 9.5 (both epilimnetic and whole column samples) in August T

4-4  ;

f] where it comprised between 13% to 37% of the total zooplankton density. No consistent

. spatial trend in cladoceran abundance was observed in 1993 (Figure 4-3).

Several patterns are evident in comparison of group composition during 1993 with the past four years (Figure 4-4). Group densities at Location 9.5 for copepods and Cladocerans in February and Cladocerans in August are above historical ranges. Rotifer densities in the Mixing Zone during May and August are above the historical range while rotifer densities at Location 15.9 in 1993 were lower overall than observed in the past four years.

FUTURE STUDIES No changes are planned for the zooplankton portion of the Lake Norman maintenance monitoring program.

SUMMARY

a *

)

  • Total zooplankton standing crops were generally highest in May and lowest in November. Zooplankton densities, in general, were slightly higher in eplimnetic samples than in whole column samples. Total zooplankton densities at Mixing Zone locations were not significantly different from background locations during any quarter in 1993. The typical trend ofincreasing zooplankton densities'from downlake to uplake was observed only in November in 1993. The range of total zooplankton densities observed during 1993 was similar to the ranges observed since 1987.
  • Overall, rotifers dominated zooplankton standing crops in 1993, as they did in 1992, followed closely in importance by copepods. Cladocerans were dominant numerically on only one occasion in 1993. Major rotifer taxa observed in 1993 were Keratella, Polyarthra and Synchaeta. Copepod populations were dominated by immature forms (nauplii and cyclopoid copepodids). As in previous years, Bosmina p was the most abundant cladoceran taxa observed at all locations. Overall, U 4-5 5

zooplaniton taxonomic composition in 1993 was similar to that observed in previous years.

LITERATURE CITED Duke Power Company.1976. McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage. 6th rev. Volume 2. Duke Power Company, Charlotte , NC.

Duke Power Company.1985. McGuire Nuclear Station,316(a) Demonstration. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1988. Lake Norman Maintenance monitoring program: 1987 Summary. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1989. Lake Norman Maintenance monitoring program:1988 Summary. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1990. Lake Norman Maintenance monitoring program: 1989 Sun. mary.. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1991. Lake Norman Maintenance monitoring program: 1990 Summary. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC.

Duke Power Company.1992. Lake Norman Maintenance monitoring program: 1991  :

Summary. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC. l Hamme, R. E.1982. Zooplankton, In J. E. Hogan and W. D. Adair (eds.). Lake Norman l Summary, Technical Report DUKEPWR/82-02. p. 323-353, Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC. 460 p.

Hutchinson, G. E.1967. A Treatise on Limnology. Vol. II. Introduction to Lake .

Biology and the Limnoplankton. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. N. Y. I115 pp.

Menhinick, E. F. and L. D. Jensen.1974. Plankton populations. In L. D. Jensen (ed.).

Environmental responses to thermal discharges from Marshall Steam Station, Lake Norman, North Carolina. Electric Power Research Institute, Cooling Water Discharge Research Project (RP-49) Report No.11., p.120-138, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimoie, MD 235 p.

4-6 I

i

i i

Table 4-1. Total zooplankton densities (no. x 1000/m3), densities of major O

zooplankton taxonomic groups, and percent composition (in parentheses) of major taxa in 10 m to surface (10-S) and bottom to surface (B-S) net tow samples collected fmm Lake Norman in February, May, August, and November 1993, 1

Sample Locations Date Tyne Taxon 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 02/23/93 10-S COPEPODA- 40.0 8.8 65.0 13.8 3.0 (34.7) (22.7) (56.7) (16.3) (25.4) i CLADOCERA 31.6 3.8 34.7 7.6 1.2  ;

(27.4) (9.8) (30.3) (9.0) (10.1) '

ROTIFERA 43.7 26.3 14.9 62.9 7.7 (37.9) (67.6) (13.0) (74.6) (64.5)

TOTAL 115.3 39.0 114.6 84.3 11.9 B-S COPEPODA 9.2 6.3 81.3 10.4 3.9 (depth [m} (29.2) (19.7) (65.1) (33.6) (26.6) of tow for each CIADOCERA 7.9 5.5 28.3 7.7 0.5 location: (25.0) (17.2) (22.7) (24.8) (3.1) 2.0-31 O 5.0-18 9.5-20 11.0-26 ROTIFERA TOTAL 14.4 (45.8) 31.5 20.1 (63.1) 31.8 15.2 (12.21 124.8 12.9 (41.7) 31.0 10.3 (70.3) 14.7 3

15.9-20) 05/25/93 10-S COPEPODA 27.4 25.6 39.0 31.2 37.7 (28.3) (42.0) (34.8) (30.8) (39.1)

CIADOCERA 3.8 7.1 2.5 1.3 2.2 (4.0) (11.6) (2.2) (1.3) (2.3)

ROTIFERA 65.7 28.2 70.7 68.6 56.5 (67.7) (46.3) (63.01 (67.9) (58.6)

TOTAL 96.9 61.0 112.1 101.1 96.4 B-S COPEPODA 18.6 21.6 35.8 26.0 33.2 (depth [m] (35.3) (16.3) (34.7) (45.5) (46.0) of tow .

for each CIADOCERA 3.7 4.0 3.5 1.6 2.7 location: (7.0) (3.0) (3.4) (2.8) (3.7) 2.0-30 5.0-19 ROTIFERA 30.5 107.0 63.8 29.7 36.3 9.5-20 (57.7) (80.7) (61.9) (45.5) (50.3) 11.0-28 15.9-21) TOTAL 52.8 132.6 103.1 57.3 72.1 4-7

i Table dL1. (continued  !

Sample Locations Date- Tyne Taxon 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 _11.1 l 08/12/93 10-S COPEPODA 1.9 5.3 3.8 3.4 4.9 (3.6) (9.9) (4.2) (7.0) (7.4)

CLADOCERA 10.7 9.3 30.1 2.9 7.0 (20.6) (17.3) (33.5) (6.0) *(10,5)

ROTIFERA 39.3 39.1 56.1 42.3 54.7 (75.8) (72.8) (62.3) (87.0) (82.1)

TOTAL 51.9 53.7 90.0 48.6 66.5 .

B-S COPEPODA 2.2 7.5 4.7 2.4 8.5 (depth [m] (8.2) (22.0) (9.4) (10.6) (12.5) of tow for each CLADOCERA 6.5 5.5 19.6 2.9 9.2 location: (24.6) (16.0) (39.5) (13.2) (13.6) 2.0-29 5.0-18 ROTIFERA 17.7 21.1 25.4 17.0 49.9 9.5-20 (67.2) (62.0) (51.1) (76.2) (73.9) 11.0-26 15.9-20) TOTAL 26.3 34.1 49.8 22.3 67.5 ,

11/30/93 10-S COPEPODA 7.2 9.6 9.7 15.3 22.0 i (45.0). (43.0) (60.9) (33.4) (27.3)

I CLADOCERA 6.7 4.9 1.7 4.4 11.1 (41.8) (21.9) (10.7) (9.7) (13.7) ,

ROTIFERA 2.1 7.8 4.5 26.1 47.5 I (11.11 (21.9) (28.4) ( 56 '. 9 ) (59.0)

TOTAL 16.0 22.3 16.0 45.8 80,6

\

B-S COPEPODA 9.9 10.6 6.4 14.0 16.1 (depth [a] (43.9) (44.1) (50.6) (33.3) (27.1) of tow '

for each CIADOCERA 10.3 8.2 1.2 4.2 7.9 location: (45.8) (34.0) (9.7) (9.9) (13.3) ,

2.0-30 -

5.0-18 ROTIFERA 2.3 5.3 5.0 23.9 35.4 9'.5-20 (10.3) (21.9) (39.7) (56.8) (59.6) 11.0-26 '

15.9-19) TOTAL 22.5 24.0 12.6 42.1 59.4

  • \

4-8

...,-_.n...w. _ , + ,- , , ~ ,y _- . . . , 4.  !? .wyr ..m..i.: r<

l l

I Table 4-2. Duncan's Multiple Range Test on 7eoplankton Densities in Lake Norman' iO NC during 1993.

February Iacation 15.9 11.0 5.0 9.5 2.0 Mean 11.9 35.1 37.2 114.5 115.2  !

May Location 15.9 2.0 11.0 9.5 5.0 Mean 96.4 96.8 101.0 112.1 132.5 August Location 11.0 2.0 5.0 15.9 9.5 l Mean 48.6 49.5 53.7 66.5 89.9 i November Location 9.5 2.0 5.0 11.0 15.9  ;

Mean 16.0 16.0 22.3 45.8 80.5 i 1

w b

4-9 i

l 1

1

- .- .. -_ - . . = _- . _ _ . .

l l

o Table 4-3. Zooplankton taxa identified from samples collected in Lake Norman f

quarterly from August 1987 through November 1993.

COPEPODA Lecame app. Nitzsch Cyclops thomasi S. A. Forbes Macrocheatus spp. Perty C. spp. Fischer Monastyla stenroost (Meissener)

Diaptomar birgel Marsh M. spp. Ehrenberg D. mississipplensis Marsk Plocarome truncatum (lavander) ,

D. pallidus Herick P. spp. Herrick j D. spp. Marsh Polyarthra euryptern (Weitzeijski)

Mesocyclops edar (S. A. Forbes) P. vulgaris Carlin M. spp. Sars P. app. E k g hopocyclopsprasinus (Fischer) Psygura app. Ehrenberg T. spp. Kiefer Synchaeta spp. Ehrenberg Calanoid copg,adites 2Hdsocerca capacina (Weireijski)

Cyclopoid copepoditeo T. cylindrica (In.hof)

Nauplii T. spp. Iamark Unidentified Bdelloides CLADOCERA INSECTA Bosmina longirostris (O. F. Muller)

B. spp. Baird Chaoborur spp. Lichtenstein Bosminopsis diesersi Richard Ceriodaphnia spp. Dana Daphnia ambigua Scourfield D. parvula Fordyce  !

D. spp. Mullen Diaphanosoma spp. Fischer t Holopedium amatonicum Stingelin l

H. spp. Stingelin  !

Leptodora kindtil(Focke) flyocryptus sordidas (Lieven)

Sida crystallina O. F. Muller i i

~

ROTIFERA Anuraeopsis app. I= '00a c Asplanchna app. Gosse Brachionus caudata Barrois and Daday B. hawmaenris Rousselet B. patulus O. F. Muller Chromogaster spp. Lauterborne Collotheca spp. Harring Conochiloides app. Klava Conochilus unicornis (Rousselet)

C. spp. Hlava i Gastropus spp. Imhof I Hexarthra spp. Schmsda Kelliania bostoniensis (Rousselet)

K. spp. Rouselet l Keratella spp. Bony de St. Vinant 4 10 6

%w h Zooplankton Density J.

No. x 10 0 0/m3 150 10n;~to Surf ace Tows

,- ~~. ~~

100 , '* - -_,

p 50 b"""'"' '*...' .

' y ' s".... " o

/

/

6- ~

g /

0 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 Locations No. x 10 0 0/m3 150

,C Bottom to Surface Tows I

100 -

s' '

,- 's ,-8

,- ~,

ja

_...........o......,/ e-50

,g...... --- -t y / ..

g

~ /

'~~ ~ g  %

0 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 Locations FRb M p ,Agg g v, ,

3 Figure 4-1. Total zooplankton density (units x1000/m ) by location for samples collected in ,

Lake Norman, North Carolina in 1993.  !

4-11

m 1

1 O t O l Mixing Zone 200 -

200 200 200 -

Loc. 2.0 C O 150

  • ~~* -

150 -

150 -

150 -

i 3 100 -

100 100 p ' *s 100

,*5 x

  • g e f 50 9 *ye* 50 '

50 -

50 O8 '7 88 89 00 91 92 93 0'7888990919293 8 08'7 88 89 90 91 92 93 0'7888990919293 8

Background Locations 30, 300 300 38 g

[ Loc. 9.5 e --- 8 -

427,000 250 Loc ' 1 0 *-- - - 250 -

250 250 j.

Loc.15.9 A----A- 5, y200 A 200 -

3 \, 200 200

- f *\,

p

. sf g j\

!150 h 150 - *\

,gN 150

- /,g\

f,ao j h\ / i? ~/M \

. j z

s /1 \ / Fi

. 100 -

I.k

1. M
  • N .('l 100 Eht% ,

1 d

),/ g\

s0 j,.-\{/ \ 50 -

V 5 f.*'4f=,4_g" 'u A so

.= 4k V*,

Oi7 i8 is 40 i, d2 93 "87 88 8s 40 di d2 is '

87888940N1d2i3 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 February May August November Figure 4-2. Total zooplankton density (units x1000/m') by location for samples collected during 1993 in Lake Norman, North Carolina.

u et '

No. x 1000/m3 No. x 1000/m3 150 1SO February August 100 -

100 -

E _

2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 16.9 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 16.9 P N .x 1000/m3 No.x 1000/m3 May November 100 -

100 -

l 50 -

50 -

0 0 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 2.0 5.0 9.5 11.0 15.9 <

caU m E CopepodsE CladoceransElRotifers ,

Figure 4-3. Zooplankton composition by month for epilimnetic samples collected during 1993 in Lake Norman, North Carolina.

i e.

No. x 1000/m3 Copepods 80 1989 1990 1992

[D e i

1991 i

i 1993 60 -

I *

. I ,s 2  !  ! .*, 18 s i  ! -

it 40 -

o. i.:f.\

A. i. .

i:#~.

i;, .,

s

. 1 g,., a

.e \.

's; 20

.4 .7,  :

i: i - -- 'l

.:+

q s .: ..> y... a.\ ./ 1 9

. ,. j:

'( .

Q 0 ..'. ..'. ..'. '. ,.'. m'., ..'.

N.. ..'.

m., . .

N., ..'. -., ..'.. .'. .'..

' I '

m., ...

No. x 1000/m3 80 CladOCeran8 1989 l 1990 Igg 1 1992 I

l i

! 1993 80 -

I t I 40 -

y/ 'g\ i i*

i's Pg I .

I-20 -

- l' \ ,'

- \ .

e o s

, ,' s N

h . p ' M,p o..,.,.,..,..N.. .

, 3 - , ~a

[,..,- -

.W " , , --wiA....+. ... ...

_ -.,................,.....-.,.N..

No. x 1000/m3 Rotifers 140 1989 1990 l i 1991  ; 1992 9 1993 120 y...q i j i 9 !i 100 -

. o i

4 J

i

?!

o , ;R. .- -

60 l: A.! '

y \s.. l

. . o  :  !

f . t .

i 60 -

\. bl..o;\'  ;

'. i.f. .i f.

/

\ li s \

i o -

ij \

.- i.: j.oy tos.,

c

t. .* .
i.  : t

\ :l!l ,h

" ~1 b.; i p l.\ l.: .:

~

./ .% u :

r. - A /i :: .\ -

. A .l M -

S9;4 g

-+- ,j

' .jJ *.% jg ,

O ..' . M a y A., He. ... Ma r A., ' ' '

N., ..b May A., N., , .' . M a yA.g N.. F.. May A.g N..

Mixingone Loc 9.5 4 Loc 1,1,0 Lo c.,,15.9 Figure 4-4. Comparison of zooplankton density by group in epilimnetic samples collected from 1989 through 1993 in Lake Norman, North Carolma.

4-14

1 CIIAPTER S

["# m)

FISilERIES INTRODUCTION

- In accordance with the NPDES permit for McGuire Nuclear Station (MNS), monitoring of specific fish population parameters was continued during 1993. The objectives of the fish j monitoring program for Lake Norman during 1993 were to: {

  • Continue striped bass mortality monitoring throughout the summer.
  • Collect striped bass distribution information required for the NPDES permit by radio tagging striped bass and tracking the striped bass during the summer period in

{ cooperation with North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC).

  • Measure limnetic fish distribution, density, and species composition in lower Lake CT Norman in 1993 using hydroacoustics and purse seine.

(we l The mixing zone was monitored for striped bass mortalities through the summer during

) sampling trips on the lake, while tracking striped bass with NCWRC biologists. During the last 2 weeks of July and the first 2 weeks of August specific trips to search for dead or dying fish were conducted. l NCWRC and Duke studied striped bass movement and habitat selection by radio tagging fish j in 1992 and 1993. Both NCWRC and Duke believe that this sampling program will identify critical sununer striped bass habitat in Lake Norman. See appendix report 5.1 (NCWRC 1993 Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Project F23-17) for the sampling methodology and results of the program.

11ydroacoustics and a purse seine were used to de'-anine fish distribution and species l composition, respectively, in Lake Norman in August 1993.

f I

l A

) [ (

l L '#

5-1 1

l METilODS AND MATERIALS A 400-ft x 30-ft deep x 3/16-inch mesh purse seine was set near the MNS discharge after sunset on August 10,1993, to collect limnetic fish. Fish captured were identified to species, [

counted, and a subsample of 500 threadfin shad were measured (mm, TL).  ;

r Fish density in the limnetic areas of the MNS mixing zone were determined with 120-KHz  !

hydmacoustic gear on 4 August 1993. Lake Norman was sampled using methods similar to ,

that reported in 1988 through 1990 (Duke Pov Company 1990). Hydroacoustic samples were collected along transects in the main channel of the lake and all major tributaries, including Ramsey Creek and near the MNS discharge. Fish densities were plotted usmg a  ;

geographic identification system (GIS).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Hydroacoustic density estimates of limnetic fish in lower Lake Norman were similar to  ;

ranges observed in other areas of the reservoir. Densities were lower in the heated water plume on August 4,1993, than in the surrounding areas, but were not any less than in other .

areas of the reservoir (Figure 5-1). A clumped distribution pattem is evident, with densities ranging from less than 10,000 to greater than 90,000/ha in the MNS mixing zone and in areas

) 'of the reservoir with ambient water temperatures. Surface water temperatures in the discharge area during August were 35*C. This is higher than the preferred temperatures of threadfin shad, the predomi' ant species in the limnetic area of the reservoir (Duke Power Company 1993).  ;

Nearly all (99.6%) of the fish collected in the purse seine in August were threadfin shad.

The only other species sampled with the purse seine in lower Lake Norman was black i

crappie.

Dead and dying striped bass were observed during the last 2 weeks in July 1993 in the MNS ,

mixing zone. On July 23, fourteen dead striped bass were counted in the main channel from the dam to Marker 7, approximately 6 miles above the dam and 2 miles above the confluence i of Davidson Creek and the main channel. On July 30, eleven dead striped bass were counted f from the dam to Marker I A, approximately 1.5 miles above the dam. Only two of the 25 l dead striped bass observed were larger than 5 pounds. Anglers fishing the area for striped l

~

O 5-2 i

4 f

?

bass were catching large numbers of fish less than the 20 inch size limit and returning them

\/ to the lake. This likely contributed to the large number of dead small fish observed. Striped -

bass less than 5 pounds have not been reported in the literature as stressed by high summer I

water temperatures; however, recent research in Tennessee has shown angling mortalities of greater than 60% for striped bass caught in the summer (Phil Bettoli, personal communication).

a FUTURE FISII STUDIES i

I

  • Continue striped bass mortality monitoring throughout the summer.
  • Determine fish distribution and conduct angler surveys to determine angler harvest, j pressure, and success on Lake Norman from March 1994 through February 1995. i l

LITERATURE CITED '

Duke Power Company. 1990. Lake Norman: 1989 maintenance monitoring program, l McGuire Nuclear Station. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC. )

)

i Duke Power Company. 1993. Lake Norman: 1992 maintenance monitoring program,  !

McGuire Nuclear Station. Duke Power Company, Charlotte, NC. l 1

I l

O 5-3 l

.._. . .. .- _= - - - ._ . _ . . -

'Pj 'tq)1 j N t

% 93 \

Kr ' 3 p, gC,

\. nb whs - _

p

  • I cth "1 m-_ . r 1p),c ~

'sA.nf t ~

x i,ykktrR "gfl'vf~

,)povy ',E,h t a

y 72 Fish densities (no/ha)

> 90,000 l'y

[t 80.000 - 90.000 70.000- 80.000 ,

j 60.000- 70.000 roo00 80.000 g a 7.d'

"
::= lA McGuire def rNuclea?s 20 o00 30 000 2#

'l7s0 g; Station Figure 5-1. Ilydroacoustic estimates of fish distribution and density in lower Lake Norman on 4 August 1993.

I 5-4 .

I i

i i

l l

l l

~

APPENDIX Progress report on summer habitat selection of striped bass in Lake Norman j

, (Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Project F23-17). A cooperative study between i l

. . the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and Duke Power Company.

l A copy will be forwarded when completed.

i- -

t

?

i I

C

)

\

A-1