|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22235A7862022-08-23023 August 2022 Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, LLW Shipping Investigation Requirements ML21181A1882021-06-30030 June 2021 E-mail from S. Johnston, Holtec, to A. Snyder and F. Bower, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Readiness Status for ISFSI Only Inspection ML21175A2092021-06-24024 June 2021 E-mail from A. Sterdis to P. Longmire - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Stating Implementation Intent) ML21162A3602021-06-11011 June 2021 E-mail Response from the State of New Jersey Regarding the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021 E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption ML21168A0172021-06-10010 June 2021 E-mail from HDI: RAI Response ML21161A2572021-06-0707 June 2021 State Consultation: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Email Response) ML21175A0712021-06-0202 June 2021 Issuance of Request for Additional Information: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications ML21148A0562021-05-27027 May 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21132A3182021-05-12012 May 2021 E-Mail from V. Gubbi, DEP to Z. Cruz, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - State of New Jersey Response to the Pending Revision to the Defueled Technical Specifications to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only ML21132A0312021-05-11011 May 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Physical Security Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21119A1422021-04-28028 April 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021 Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid ML21099A0382021-04-0808 April 2021 Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Request for Additional Information - HDI Request for Approval of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan ML21085A4872021-03-26026 March 2021 E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Acceptance Review: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021 Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML21064A2392021-03-0202 March 2021 E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Physical Security Plan ML20345A1462020-12-0909 December 2020 E-mail - Response to Request for Additional Information: HDI Request for One-Time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B FOF Requirements ML20335A3112020-11-30030 November 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for a one-time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020 Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020 Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML20279A5082020-10-0505 October 2020 Email to Holtec - Response to Notification of Oyster Creek Onsite Property Insurance Coverage ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0 ML20134H8742020-05-12012 May 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Temporary Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements ML20133J9182020-05-11011 May 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from Part 73 Qualification Requirements ML20120A0252020-04-22022 April 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Oyster Creek Sea Turtle Handling and Conservation Recommendation Obligations NRC-2019-0073, Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza2019-10-30030 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza ML19344C8022019-10-20020 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-20-2019 a Dressler ML19344C8002019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 W Mcmullin ML19344C7982019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 M Noto ML19344C7992019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 s Feldman ML19344C7932019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 C Bischoff ML19344C7962019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 G Adams ML19344C7912019-10-0808 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 J Branciforte ML19344C7902019-10-0808 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 Anonymous ML19344C7892019-10-0505 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-05-2019 P Dressler ML19263D1222019-09-20020 September 2019 for Your Action Request for Additional Information Hdi Oyster Creek PSDAR ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019 NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation ML19182A3422019-07-0101 July 2019 Transaction ML19178A0702019-06-26026 June 2019 Email to State of New Jersey - Oyster Creek - Request Comments on Proposed Amendment to Remove Reference to the Oyster Creek Cyber Security Plan and Update License Condition 2.C.(4) in the Renewed Facility License ML19196A3422019-06-20020 June 2019 Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption (Sierra Club) ML19196A3342019-06-20020 June 2019 Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption ML19162A2242019-06-11011 June 2019 NRC to NMFS, NRC Responses to NMFS Requests for Additional Information for Oyster Creek ESA Section 7 Consultation NRC-2018-0237, Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application2019-06-0707 June 2019 Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application ML19155A1182019-06-0404 June 2019 Incoming E-mail from State of New Jersey on the Oyster Creek Exemption for Reduced Insurances and Use of Decommissioning Trust Fund for Spent Fuel Management and Site Restoration ML19155A1192019-06-0404 June 2019 State of New Jersey Comments - Oyster Creek Conforming Amendment Associated with the Oyster Creek Generating Station License Transfer Application ML19154A0582019-05-31031 May 2019 E-mail Response from State of New Jersey Dated May 31, 2019, Notification-and-Request-Oyster Creek License Transfer Application L-2018-LLM-0002 ML19158A2912019-05-30030 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS ML19158A2772019-05-28028 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS ML19148A4392019-05-24024 May 2019 NMFS to NRC, Requests for Additional Information to Support Oyster Creek Reinitiated Section 7 Consultation 2022-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
From: "Mike Mulligan" <steamshovel@adelphia.net>
To: "Mindy Landau" <MSL@nrc.gov>
Date: 3/26/03 12:38PM
Subject:
Oyster Creek refueling 2.206 additional questions ("Oyster Creek 2.206 refueling problems" dated 3/20/03)
Oyster Creek 2.206 Another important question that needs to be asked; just what value does the new refueling license amendment (refueling with interlocks INOP) provide to the utility "and the public". Is it always about the utility interest? We need to ask, might this bureaucratic change create no real actual results for the utilities -NEI churning and diverting NRC resources away from their primary safety function?
What it comes down to, was the license changes created because of a safety reason or was it done for the convenience of the utility? What we really need is a value tool -such as how many refueling hours (percentage of refueling time) was predicted/projected, and actual hours, that will to be saved by the amendments changes at Oyster Creek and the rest of the plants. You can do the estimation. As Ive mentioned in the past, the NRC and the industry has not justified with actual data and analysis that actual "unpreventable" events have distracted plant refueling, which leads to the need for the changes.
And that is a very dangerous issue. In that you are fearful of clearly explaining to the public about problems with safety system that ends up driving license amendment changes. You are organizing the facts to the utilities benefit and you think it is ethical that if the change gets legally through the license amendment process with a selective justification -this is your only responsibility to the public. Hey, it met the legal rules, even if we looked selectively at the problem towards a benefit to the utility.
Another set of questions that needs asking is about the 7 day surveillance testing of the refueling interlocks and components holding up the very valuable refueling time. Do we have any actual data and analysis about if really a critical path delay, such as a refueling holdup for interlock testing has any actual effect on lengthening outages? Just because refueling activities are delayed for a few hours for testing, there can be other things going on with the outage and refueling shutdown would not be delayed on the big picture. We further
question if the seven day clock runs out, could there have been ignored non refueling time where testing could have occurred. In other words, on day five, could they have had a 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> hold-up time on refueling where surveillance testing could have been accomplished, and was not, and that creates the issues of the run out of the 7 day clock?
Is this really about "refueling mismanagement" that is driving the reduction of safety requirements? You put the acceptance of license amendments in only terms of risk calculation without any evaluation if the changes are being driven from utility negligence, mismanagement and cost savings pressures. Did I bring up yet about the Davis Besse containment sampling filters license amendment changes? You guys think that it OK if you just put it through an agency process - even if the outcome is illusional and distortive. Well, its OK because our selective risk calculation said there was an acceptable level of risk increase -even if the license changes was driven from utility negligence. "You got an insiders game going on here."
Again we are wondering about why the increasing intensity of refueling license changes nationwide in the last few years. What is driving this?
You have two years to prepare the refueling system for the upcoming outage -just why cant this "high value" system run for two or three weeks without the fear of breakdowns and the need to INOP systems? It really perplexes me that many of these plants can work for twenty years with their initial tech spec refueling characterization -so why are there changes now?
Thanks again, mike mulligan Hinsdale, NH
CC: <dlochbaum@ucsusa.org>
Mail Envelope Properties (3E81E584.608 : 20 : 58888)
Subject:
Oyster Creek refueling 2.206 additional questions ("Oyster Creek 2.206 refueling problems" dated 3/20/03)
Creation Date: 3/26/03 12:40PM From: "Mike Mulligan" <steamshovel@adelphia.net>
Created By: steamshovel@adelphia.net Recipients nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFN_DO MSL (Mindy Landau) ucsusa.org dlochbaum CC Post Office Route owf5_po.OWFN_DO nrc.gov ucsusa.org Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3771 03/26/03 12:40PM Part.001 7461 Mime.822 13269 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard