ML17258A563

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:13, 4 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on NRC 811228 Draft Safety Evaluation Per SEP Topic III-7.A,containment Tendons.Resolution of Comments Should Be Specifically Addressed in Conjuction W/Review of Containment Tendon Rept
ML17258A563
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/18/1982
From: Maier J
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TASK-03-07.A, TASK-3-7.A, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8202240087
Download: ML17258A563 (6)


Text

tA. g REGULATORY ORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYS 1 (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8202240087 DOC ~ DATE: 82/02/18 NOTARI'ZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-244 BYNAME Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Planti Uni)t ii Rochester G 05000244 AUTH AUTHOR AFF IL IATION MAIERe J ~ Ee Rochester Gas 8 Electric RECIPIENT AFF IL'IATION Corp'EC IP ~ NAME .

CRUTCHF IELD i D, Operating Reactors Branch '5

SUBJECT:

Comments on NRC 811228 draf t safety evaluation per SEP Topic III 7Aicontainmeqt tendons, Resolution w/review'of ofcomments ~should be specifically addressed in conjuction containment tendon rept.

DISTRIBUTION CODE ~ A035S 'COPIES RECEIVED LTR ~

J ENCL D

~ SIZE ~

TITLE: SEP Topics NOTES: 1 copy:SEP Sect, Ldr. 05000244 RECIPIENT ~COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NA'ME LTTR ENCL ID ~CODE/NAME LT'TR ENCL ACTION e ORB P5 BC 01 7 INTERNAL! IE 06 2 NRR/DE/ADMQE 13 NRR/DE/HGEB 10 2 NRR/DL/DRAB 11 NRR/DL/SEPB 12 3 N AEB NRR/DS I/CS8 07 1 F ILE 04 EXTERNAL: ACRS 14 10 LPDR 03 NRC PDR 02 1 NTIS i5 93 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES I

REQUIRED: LTTR ~ ENCL

y N

r. a N

I III

l t

1

'R ll

<</8/I2'iZII////

/l/// l/I //Zl/I/////

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649 JOHN E. MAILER TELEPHONE Vice President AREA coDE 7ie 546-2700 BECr NEO February 18, 1982 iR Director of. Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief 9 g g4N QRIKRl mam~ ~

FFB 2 3 19S2~

y Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Sub j ect: SEP Topic III-7.A, Inservice Inspection Including Prestressed Concrete Containment with Either Grouted or Ungrouted Tendons R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244

Dear Mr. Crutchfield:

Rochester Gas and Electric transmitted a letter relative to this SEP topic on February 3, 1982. In that letter, we stated that any requirements relative to the Ginna containment tendons should be specified in conjunction with the NRC's review of the Containment Tendon Report, submitted by RG&E letter dated February 1, 1982. RG&E has also reviewed the NRC's December 28, 1981 draft. SER for this SEP topic, and has the following comments.

Resolution of these comments should be specifically addressed in conjunction with the review of the Containment Tendon Report.

1. As noted in Section IV, Review Guidelines, the revised Regulatory Guide 1.35 is expected to be issued by mid to late 1982. Changes to the Ginna surveillance program and Technical Specifications, if required, should be made at that time when implementation of the revised Regulatory Guide 1.35 on existing plants will be determined.
2. In general, it appears that the additional requirements specified in the Conclusions section of this draft SER can be implemented. However, the following clarifications apply.

a ~ It is expected that the acceptance bands for each tendon will be established prior to the next surveillance test (1983), rather than shortly after analyzing the Lehigh test results.

(';I.I',-8202240087 8202i8

'"PDR *DOCH, 05000244

'I'..P, 'PDR ",

~ i."

~ ll C',

'I f

ll g

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC Cu P. SHEET NO.

February 18, 1982 Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield

b. The visual inspection of tendon anchorage assembly hardware which was conducted during the 1981 test included only those on top of the containment. This would also apply to all future visual inspections.

c It is noted that a report should be submitted to the NRC after each inspection. RG&E considers it necessary to submit a report only limits are not met.

if Technical Specifciation Very, truly yours, Jo n E. Maier

i r3i y-.

1