ML101470183

PSEG Drop-in May 26, 2010 - NRC Slides

ML101470183
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	05/26/2010
From:	Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	NRC Region 1
KROHN P G, RI/DRP/PB4/610-337-5120
References
Download: ML101470183 (35)

Text

... Agenda Introductions Overview Hope Creek Performance Update Salem Performance Update Salem Unit 2 Tritium Security Update License Renewal & New Nuclear Closing Comments OPSEG Nuclear ILC Tom Joyce Bob Braun Larry Wagner Ed Eilola Carl Fricker Paul Davison Christine Neely Tom Joyce

PSEG Nuclear 2010 Safety Excellence Equipment Reliability Excellence Refueling Outage Excellence Developing Our People Running the Business Nuclear U,C PSEG OSHA Rate VS. INPO Index I Capacity Factor 5 100 Operational Excellence

4.5 Model

Implemented 90 4 80 0 1)3.5 CtI u. 70 .B 3 'u CtID. << 2.5 60 ::I: en -><o 2 50 s:: 1.5 o 40 1 30 0.5 o I Ii I 20 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 -OSHA Rate -INPO Index -Capacity Factor OPSEG NuclearUC

Hope Creek Scorecard

-Results through ____________________

Totallndustrial Safety Accident Rate (TiSAR 18 OSHA Recordable Incident Rate OSHA Days Away from Work INPO Performance MSPI Margin (Systems in Action Regulatory Collective Radiation Exposure Operating Cost (YTD) o& M Budget Controllable

($M O&M Joint Owned Units ($M Total Generation (GWhrs YTD, Net Summer Generation (GWhrs, Net Capital Plan Versus Actual ($M Capital Projects Results (Quarterly

+month Nuclear Fringe Cost Forced Loss Rate Radwaste (Cubic Meters Waste -Percent Landfill Disposal Air, Water, Spills (All Exceedances Notices of Violation Year end goals reflect Corporate Scorecard unless NlIcif::ar stretch aDa/ established OPSEG NuclearU"C 0.00 0.00 1 o Green ...., 11.2 15.1 164 35 3,364 0 9.2 96% 17 21 28.7% 0 0 0.19 0.00 1 Green 11.8 15.9 165 43 3,262 0 11.3 95% 18 .. , 76 30.6% 0 0 Goal Not Met 0.19 0.00 3 o Green 150.0 20.5 436 156 250 30.6% 1 0 ERI through April ERI Points Area ERI Sub-Indicators Hope Creek Elec. Generation (Lagging) (Lagging)

1.2 Unplanned

Power Reductions per 7000 hr. Critical (NRC Indicator) (Lagging)

System Health (Lagging)

Maintenance Work Mgmt. (Leading)

Program Bases NllclearUC Recent EDG update '8' RHR Heat Exchanger leak 'A' Recirculation Pump trip 'A' Circulating Water Pump discharge valve NuciearUJC Hope Creek Procedure Excellence Focus Establish a culture that ensures procedures are used as written Procedure quality is continuously improved through ownership and engagement of end users Three Team Approach -Administrative, implementing and Metrics Procedure of the Week Program OPSEG Nuclear Hope Creek Safety Culture Pilot NEI Pilot Process concludes with recommendations to NRC for implementation

• Next meeting June 2010 HC completed two cycles of monitoring process and continues orocess*

• Most issues binned to SCP #5: Nuclear technology is recognized as special and unique

• Two attributes (Procedure quality &mastery of fundamentals) capture most issues

• A Common Cause Evaluation will address corrective actions NuclearLLC Hope Creek Key 2010 Events Component Design Basis (CDBI) License renewal audits Triennial Fire Protection Inspection and B.S.b INPO E&A visit EP exercise evaluation

• Bi-annual NRC Graded Exercise

• FEMA Ingestion Pathway Exercise OPSEG NuclearLLC Hope Creek Key 2010 Events Upcoming Dry cask storage campaign RF16

• Co60 License renewal inspection Managing Gas Accumulation in ECCS inspection Operations Training accreditation renewal ILOT exam OPSEG Nuclear U,C

Salem Scorecard

-Results through __________________

..._ ....__

Total Industrial Safety Accident Rate (TISAR 18 Months) OSHA Recordable Incident Rate (YTD) OSHA Days Away from Work (VTD) 0.00 Event*free Clock Resets (YTD) 1 MAST , Reliable INPO Performance Index MSPI Margin (Systems in Action Status) 1 Regulatory Performance Green Collective Radiation Exposure (YTD) 36.2 Operating Cost (YTD) o& M Budget Controllable

($M YTD) 164 O&M Joint Owned Units ($M YTD) 35 Total Generation (GWhrs YTD, Net 2) Summer Generation (GWhrs, Net 2) 0 Capital Plan Versus Actual ($M YTD) 16 Capital Projects Results (Quarterly

+month lag) 96% Nuclear Fringe Cost (Quarterly) 17 Radwaste (Cubic Meters YTD) 23 Waste Percent Landfill Disposal (YTD) 28.7% Air, Water, Spills (All Exceedances YTD) 0 Notices of Violation (YTD) 0 Year end goals reflect Corporate Scorecard unless Nuclear stretch goal establisher/

OPSEG NuclearU.C 0.19 0.00 2 0.00 4 1 Green 42.9 165 43 6,051 0 21 95% 18 39 30.6% 1 0 Goal Not Met 0 Green 89.3 436 156 19,566 5,034 43 95% 73 140.0 30.6 e A, 1 0 Salem Equipment Reliability Index through ERI A ...... ERI Sub-tndicaio

....tndlc.atol" 1.1,Legging': I.Lagging}

J 1,3 Ch81le-ngeto Ops r 2.1 IUnplanned LeO Entries (SID & .!..72 hrs in last 3 months) (Legg.ng) (Legging}

2.2 (Utllding, 4.1(Lagging! (Lea'liingJ (Leading} Nllelem' LLC Recent Aux Feedwater System piping Control Room Chiller performance January Salem Unit 2 forced outages Salem Unit 2 tritium Nuclear Salem Procedure Excellence Focus Area __________________

...... , Use and reinforce of Human Performance and Error Prevention Tools

• Procedure of the Week

• 2R17 and 1 R20 performance Specific Areas of Focus

• Procedure use and adherence

• Procedure and work document quality

• Accountability Overall Trends Reflect Continuing OPSEG Nuclear-J1£ Salem Key 2010 Events Salem 1 R20 refueling outage License renewal audits EP exercise evaluation II Bi-annual NRC Giaded

• FEMA Ingestion Pathway Exercise Occupational Radiation Safety Inspection ILOT exams (')PSEG NuclearUJC Salem Key 2010 Events Upcoming First dry cask storage campaign License renewal inspection Managing Gas Accumulation in ECCS inspection August INPO evaluation NuclearlLC

Tritium Investigation Current Status and Next Stops Repaired plant vent expansion joint leak and restored

• High level source eliminated Monitor isolated drain pipe for in leakage Continue sampling plan

• Well sampling to validate conditions

• Extend wells down to lean concrete

• Install additional monitoring wells where appropriate Extent of condition investigation to address any additional sources Continue stakeholder briefings OPSEG NuclearUC

Security Excellence Work Environment

• Communications

• Integration with site organization (Part of the

• Executive

&crew MRMs

• Safety Committee

• Staffing

• Increased PSEG Security staffing/oversight

• Security engineer position

• New officers to support Fatigue Rule Equipment

• Corrected "long-standing" maintenance issues

• Ensure security equipment is repaired in timely manner OPSEG Nuclear ILC Security Excellence Plan -Human Behaviors

• Observation program

• Fundamental of the Month

• Human Performance training

• Lesson plans incorporate Human Performance (HU)

• Eight hours in initiai training dedicated to HUirisk awareness

• Implement Wackenhut Supervisory Development Program

• Recently completed all Team Leads participation in Wackenhut Certified Security Specialist program

• Industrial safety performance

• Surpassed one-million man-hours without a lost-time accident

• First time Security accomplished this performance OPSEG Nuciearli"C Security Excellence Plan -Human Procedure upgrade project completed

• Revised over 200 (All procedures requiring Procedure Use and Adherence Key Focus Area

• Field Books

• observations focusing as defined by trend data

• Attained through DRUM, Corrective Action and FMS trending NuclearLLC

---

Security Excellence ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

_________

...;,1." **

' Monthly Average of Open Security Equipment (Total Open Work Orders I February 2008

• May 300 PI Status -GREEN PI Measures Total open notifications related to Security Equipment requiring Maintenance.

225 Basis: Industry Comparison I 175 Updated: Weekly ------------_._---, 2010 Year End Goal: < 30 150 I As of Nov 09, the year end goal was 125 reset from <40 to <30 open notifications

.---.. _._...100 75 o to 30 31 to 50 51 to 60 25 f--"' >60 111111 I o 00 00 00 00 00 <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl

0) Ol 0) 0) 0) Ol 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 .,....0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 , .-.-, .-..... .!. .!. I .!..b (\J :>. c "5 . 0, 0-0 > 1:. :>. c: "5 . 0, 0. 8 > , (,) c .0 :>. CIl 0-(0 ::l -, CIl 0 Q) (0 Q) 0-(0 ::::I ..., ::l (!) 0 CIl (0 <ll 0-ro t.L. :::E << :!E ., (f) 0 z 0 " ..., C u.. :!E << :!E ..., << (f) z 0 ., u.. :::E << :!E 0 PSEG NuciearLLC Recent Security Rules Time extension until December for portions of the rule All other requirements implemented by March 2010

• Validate and verify Target Sets

• Revisions to Security Plan

• Additional Security officers for compensatory measures NuclearLLC Security Physical Improvements

$40 million investment Protected Area alarm upgrade and camera modifications

(>2 mile perimeter)

Robust Intrusion Detection System (IDS) backed by Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)

• Power at all Underground penetrations I intake structures IDS improvements Single Act mitigation measures Modify Vehicle Barrier System Warehouse process changes OPSEG NuclearUC

Salem and Hope Creek License Renewal Status Public meeting held on November 5,2009 No contentions filed by outside groups Ongoing series of audits and inspections throughout 2010

• Scoping &Screening Methodology in January

• Aging Management Program in February

• Environmental in March

• Regional Inspection in June and August

• NJDEP staff have been involved in all reviews Next public meeting in October to review draft Site Environmental Impact Statement ACRS Sub-Committee Scheduled for November and December OPSEG NuclearLLC 11 New Nuclear Development Site NuclearUC Requires additional property from Army Corps of Engineers Reduces/eliminates impact on existing operation Enables single Security Protected Area with existing station Cooling towers constructed on dredge spoil area (not wetlands) Wetland impact is 229 acres 90 inside dikes 41 for proposed causeway 98 for permanent plant footprint Most is degraded dominated wetlands I .. Proposed Infrastructure Improvements New access road to Elsinboro

• Mitigates construction traffic

• Improves evacuation planning

• Improves reliability of off-site EP support (Law Enforcement)

Transmission Interconnection

• A new line may be required for grid

• Two proposed routes in ESP (Southern DE or PA)

• PSEG developing a stability solution without a new transmission line OPSEG NuclearUC

• PSEG ESP Application gO-Day Letter submitted February 11, 2010 NRC public process meeting held on May 6, 2010 ESP application submitted May 25, 2010 NJ Coastal Consistency Determination application filed concurrently What's next NRC sufficiency review -May to July 2010 NRC Federal Register notice starting environmental review in July or August 2010 gO-day public comment period follows the Federal Register notice Environmental Scoping meeting -November 2010 timeframe NuclearLLC r "