ML19339C504: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 41: Line 41:
STATUS REPORT #2 TO PRD-80/46 i
STATUS REPORT #2 TO PRD-80/46 i
l l-                  I. Description of Deficiency Expansion anchors for conduit hangers, instrument process tubing, i                        and air supply supports have been installed without prior engi-
l l-                  I. Description of Deficiency Expansion anchors for conduit hangers, instrument process tubing, i                        and air supply supports have been installed without prior engi-
!                        neering approval, as required by the specification. The scope
!                        neering approval, as required by the specification. The scope of the deficiency has been expanded to include instrumentation, pipe hangers, electrical, electrical hangers, and General Mechan-i                        ical Corporation, a subcontractor for HVAC ductwork.
;
of the deficiency has been expanded to include instrumentation, pipe hangers, electrical, electrical hangers, and General Mechan-i                        ical Corporation, a subcontractor for HVAC ductwork.
;
II. Resolution of Deficiency Conduct an investigation to determine the location of all con-
II. Resolution of Deficiency Conduct an investigation to determine the location of all con-
,                        crete expansion anchors which have been installed in-restricted areas, document the nonconformances and obtain engineering dis-4                        position.
,                        crete expansion anchors which have been installed in-restricted areas, document the nonconformances and obtain engineering dis-4                        position.
Line 51: Line 48:
;                          Conduct training and retraining (                          personnel.
;                          Conduct training and retraining (                          personnel.
III. Status of Resolution I
III. Status of Resolution I
,                      -The Constructor has completed the investigation and has routed
,                      -The Constructor has completed the investigation and has routed nonconformances to the Architect / Engineer for disposition, a
;
nonconformances to the Architect / Engineer for disposition, a
The Constructor's Work Plan Procedure, " Installation, Inspection, and Documentation for Concrete Expansion Anchors", has been re-vised to require certification of all installers of expansion.
The Constructor's Work Plan Procedure, " Installation, Inspection, and Documentation for Concrete Expansion Anchors", has been re-vised to require certification of all installers of expansion.
                                     ~
                                     ~
anchors. This certification signifies the installers have com-pleted. training and testing on installation of expansion anchors.                                                                                                    I
anchors. This certification signifies the installers have com-pleted. training and testing on installation of expansion anchors.                                                                                                    I Retraining has been conducted for all craf tsmen, non-menual per-
;
Retraining has been conducted for all craf tsmen, non-menual per-
  ~
  ~
sonnel, and field engineers involved with the. installation of ex-pansion anchors. The retraining program includes the requirements
sonnel, and field engineers involved with the. installation of ex-pansion anchors. The retraining program includes the requirements of the Work Plan Procedure and the restricted areas defined by
;
of the Work Plan Procedure and the restricted areas defined by
!                            the Specification.
!                            the Specification.
IV.      Reasons for Delaying Final Report The nonconformances require disposition by the Architect / Engineer and evaluation for their af feet on safety.
IV.      Reasons for Delaying Final Report The nonconformances require disposition by the Architect / Engineer and evaluation for their af feet on safety.

Revision as of 10:11, 18 February 2020

Second Status Rept Re Installation of Expansion Anchors for Conduit Hangers,Instrument Process Tubing & Air Supply Supports.Investigation Completed.Final Deficiency Rept Will Be Provided by 810310
ML19339C504
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/11/1980
From: Mcgaughy J
MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
AECM-80-282, NUDOCS 8011180502
Download: ML19339C504 (2)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:~ 1

                ,     ,   h      MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY                                '

Helping Build Alississippi I P. O. B O X 16 4 0, J A C K S O N MI S SIS SIP PI 3 9 2 0 5 JA8AES.P McGAUGHY,

    .uv r vics    ms.cnrJR November 11> 1980 Office of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 3100 - Atlanta, Georgia 30303 , Attention: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

SUBJECT:

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-416/417 File 0260/15525/15526 PRD-80/46, Interim Report #2, Expansion Anchors AECM-80/282 On August 4, 1980, Mississippi Power & Light Company notified Mr. C. R. McFarland of your office of a Potentially Reportable De-ficiency (PRD) at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (CGNS) construction site. The deficiency concerns installation of expansion anchors for conduit hangers, instrument process tubing, and air supply sup-ports without proper approval. An interim report of our progress in evaluating the extent of the deficiency and impact on safe operations of the plant is at-tached. We expect to complete our evaluation and provide you our final report on this deficiency by March 10, 1981. Yours trul fg J. P. McGaughy, Jr. EWC:mt Attachment cc: Mr. N. L. Stampley Mr. Victor Stello, Directo Mr. R. B. McGehee Division of Inspection & Enforcement Mr. T. B. Conner U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 getT sa us a Member Middle South Utilities System h [[ h

l

  'jp , -

{ Attachment to AECM-80/282 i Page 1 of 1 I STATUS REPORT #2 TO PRD-80/46 i l l- I. Description of Deficiency Expansion anchors for conduit hangers, instrument process tubing, i and air supply supports have been installed without prior engi- ! neering approval, as required by the specification. The scope of the deficiency has been expanded to include instrumentation, pipe hangers, electrical, electrical hangers, and General Mechan-i ical Corporation, a subcontractor for HVAC ductwork. II. Resolution of Deficiency Conduct an investigation to determine the location of all con- , crete expansion anchors which have been installed in-restricted areas, document the nonconformances and obtain engineering dis-4 position. l l Revise any procedures or other documentation, as necessary, to preclude recurrence. i

Conduct training and retraining ( personnel.

III. Status of Resolution I , -The Constructor has completed the investigation and has routed nonconformances to the Architect / Engineer for disposition, a The Constructor's Work Plan Procedure, " Installation, Inspection, and Documentation for Concrete Expansion Anchors", has been re-vised to require certification of all installers of expansion.

                                    ~

anchors. This certification signifies the installers have com-pleted. training and testing on installation of expansion anchors. I Retraining has been conducted for all craf tsmen, non-menual per-

~

sonnel, and field engineers involved with the. installation of ex-pansion anchors. The retraining program includes the requirements of the Work Plan Procedure and the restricted areas defined by ! the Specification. IV. Reasons for Delaying Final Report The nonconformances require disposition by the Architect / Engineer and evaluation for their af feet on safety. 3 V. Projected Final Report Date All actions are expected'to be completed early in 1981. We ex-pect to submit our final report to you by March 10, 1981. 4 h

   . , ,                                   _ . . . . . . . . . . -  -    -. _ - _ _ _ , . . . _ . _ . _ , , . _ _ . _ , , . . _ , . . . . . . _ , _ . . . , . .                . . . ~ , _ . _ _}}