ML18139A556: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.. . (* "** . * ) ** --* ..
{{#Wiki_filter:..                                                         ,.
* Vepco VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention:
*  )
Director, Division of Human Factors Safety  
                      **                . (* "**   .
                                                              *           ~ --* ..
Vepco                           VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 September 26, .1980 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                           Serial No. 796 Washington, D. C. 20555                                     PSE&C/GLP:bep Attention: Director, Division of Human                       Docket Nos. 50-338/339 Factors Safety                                                 50-404/405 50-280/281


==Dear Sir:==
==Dear Sir:==
September 26, .1980 Serial No. 796 PSE&C/GLP:bep Docket Nos. 50-338/339 50-404/405 50-280/281 We have reviewed the draft Human Engineering Guide to Control Room Evaluation, released on August 20, 1980. Ii1 order to properly address all aspects of the draft document we combined our operational expertise with the Human Factors expertise of a consultant, the ARD Corporation, Dr. Eugene Silverman,.president.
 
Dr. Silverman had previously provided consulting services fbr us during the modifications to the North Anna trol room which were reviewed and approved by your Human Factors Division.
We have reviewed the draft Human Engineering Guide to Control Room Evaluation, released on August 20, 1980. Ii1 order to properly address all aspects of the draft document we combined our operational expertise with the Human Factors expertise of a consultant, the ARD Corporation, Dr. Eugene Silverman,.president. Dr. Silverman had previously provided consulting services fbr us during the modifications to the North Anna con-trol room which were reviewed and approved by your Human Factors Division.
The enclosed document package is a compilation of our operational cernss as well as detailed criticism of the technical aspects of the lines. We feel that there is considerable work yet to be done to the ing guidelines prior to final issuance.
The enclosed document package is a compilation of our operational con-cernss as well as detailed criticism of the technical aspects of the guide-lines. We feel that there is considerable work yet to be done to the exist-ing guidelines prior to final issuance. We do not feel that the importance of the document has been*reflected. in the quality or it's applicability to Nuclear Power Station Control Rooms.
We do not feel that the importance of the document has been*reflected.
We would certainly appreciate your full consideration of our comments, if we can be of further assistance please advise.
in the quality or it's applicability to Nuclear Power Station Control Rooms. We would certainly appreciate your full consideration of our comments, if we can be of further assistance please advise. Very~ your~ £i:\;f,&~
Very~ your~
tlfr//' Manager -Nuclear Operations Enclosure f ;,, ,.}}
                                        £i:\;f,&~
tlfr//' Manager - Nuclear Operations Enclosure
                                                ;,,
f}}

Revision as of 03:29, 21 October 2019

Forwards Evaluation & Critique of NUREG/CR-1580. Document Does Not Reflect Importance in Quality or Applicability to Nuclear Power Station Control Rooms
ML18139A556
Person / Time
Site: Surry, North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/1980
From: Sylvia B
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18139A557 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-CR-1580 796, NUDOCS 8010010678
Download: ML18139A556 (1)


Text

.. ,.

  • )
    • . (* "** .
  • ~ --* ..

Vepco VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 September 26, .1980 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No. 796 Washington, D. C. 20555 PSE&C/GLP:bep Attention: Director, Division of Human Docket Nos. 50-338/339 Factors Safety 50-404/405 50-280/281

Dear Sir:

We have reviewed the draft Human Engineering Guide to Control Room Evaluation, released on August 20, 1980. Ii1 order to properly address all aspects of the draft document we combined our operational expertise with the Human Factors expertise of a consultant, the ARD Corporation, Dr. Eugene Silverman,.president. Dr. Silverman had previously provided consulting services fbr us during the modifications to the North Anna con-trol room which were reviewed and approved by your Human Factors Division.

The enclosed document package is a compilation of our operational con-cernss as well as detailed criticism of the technical aspects of the guide-lines. We feel that there is considerable work yet to be done to the exist-ing guidelines prior to final issuance. We do not feel that the importance of the document has been*reflected. in the quality or it's applicability to Nuclear Power Station Control Rooms.

We would certainly appreciate your full consideration of our comments, if we can be of further assistance please advise.

Very~ your~

£i:\;f,&~

tlfr//' Manager - Nuclear Operations Enclosure

,,

f