ML20234D690: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20234D690
| number = ML20234D690
| issue date = 10/31/1964
| issue date = 10/31/1964
| title = Advises That Newmark Svcs Outlined in 641005 Ltr to Commission Performed in Connection W/Aec Safety Evaluation of Bodega Bay & Malibu Reactors
| title = Advises That Newmark Svcs Outlined in to Commission Performed in Connection W/Aec Safety Evaluation of Bodega Bay & Malibu Reactors
| author name = Case E
| author name = Case E
| author affiliation = US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
| author affiliation = US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Line 12: Line 12:
| case reference number = FOIA-85-665
| case reference number = FOIA-85-665
| document report number = NUDOCS 8709220166
| document report number = NUDOCS 8709220166
| title reference date = 10-05-1964
| package number = ML20234A767
| package number = ML20234A767
| document type = INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM, MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM, MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE

Latest revision as of 20:32, 20 March 2021

Advises That Newmark Svcs Outlined in to Commission Performed in Connection W/Aec Safety Evaluation of Bodega Bay & Malibu Reactors
ML20234D690
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay, 05000214
Issue date: 10/31/1964
From: Case E
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709220166
Download: ML20234D690 (1)


Text

_ . _ - - _

I g

i Piles

  1. t . )

3'g se' Edson_ G. Case, Assistant Director  ;

Division of Reactor Licensing l

l NEWlMRK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES, ..

CONTRACT AT(h9-5)-2667 1 1

i l

The services outlined in Dr. Newmark's letter of  !

October 5,196h to the Cornission have been performed ']

in connection with the. Regulatory Staff's safety -

evaluation of the Bode 6a Bay and Malibu reactors.

I With respect to the trip to Bethesda on September 16 for the meeting on September 17, it should be noted' that the, statement of expenses indicates that this meeting involved travel from Washington to New York.

However, sinceethe work under the sub ject contract did not require this part of the trip, I presume that Dr. Newmark has claimed reimbursement from Washington to New York in lieu of Washington to Urbana, cc: Administrative Officer,. REG Division of Contra ets r

OFTICE > ....h.h. .. .. .. .. _ . . . . . . . . . . . .

SURNAME > ... .k 2.;bh ,... ...,

oArE > 10/_/6h , _ _ , _ _ _ ,_ ,,

IMrtu AEC.8 th (Her. 941) ,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,ics 1Hs7as-a 8709220166 851217 .

PDR FOIA FIRESTOBS-665 PDR

___--__-_- _____ _ -_ - -