ML20126B156: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
| project =  
| project = TAC:M82401
| stage = Approval
| stage = Approval
}}
}}
Line 42: Line 42:
: 50. 54 ( f) . " The.GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which contain. time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB), inverters or other_onsite power sources for VIB,.and-tie, breakers.          If. procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the
: 50. 54 ( f) . " The.GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which contain. time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB), inverters or other_onsite power sources for VIB,.and-tie, breakers.          If. procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the
                               ; reasons why.the controls are not neeJed is requested.
                               ; reasons why.the controls are not neeJed is requested.
By: letter dated January 31, 1992,'you responded to the GL, indicating that the                          y' Cooper Nuclear Station'(CNS) procedures address time limitations and                                        '
By: {{letter dated|date=January 31, 1992|text=letter dated January 31, 1992}},'you responded to the GL, indicating that the                          y' Cooper Nuclear Station'(CNS) procedures address time limitations and                                        '
                               . surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and= inverters or                                  l other onsite power sources that= supply the vital instrument buses (Generic-                                ,
                               . surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and= inverters or                                  l other onsite power sources that= supply the vital instrument buses (Generic-                                ,
Issue 48). .You also indicated that you have verified that CNS:has no tie-                                3 l breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed-your rAsponse- to the GL and finds that _it. meets the reporting requirements set                                ;
Issue 48). .You also indicated that you have verified that CNS:has no tie-                                3 l breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed-your rAsponse- to the GL and finds that _it. meets the reporting requirements set                                ;
Line 88: Line 88:
: 50. 54 ( f) . '' The GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which contain time limitations cnd survr:llance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB) inverters or other onsite power sources for VIB. and      >
: 50. 54 ( f) . '' The GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which contain time limitations cnd survr:llance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB) inverters or other onsite power sources for VIB. and      >
tie breakers. If procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the reasons why the controls are not needed is requested.
tie breakers. If procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the reasons why the controls are not needed is requested.
By letter dated January 31, 1992, you responded to the GL, indicating that the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) procedures address time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and inverters or other onsite Iower sources that supply the vital instrumcnt buses (Generic issue 48). You also indichted that you have verified that CNS has no tie breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed your response to the GL and finJs that it meets the reporting requirements set forth in GL 91-11      This comp?etes the staff review of your GL response for C'lS and closes TAC No M82401. If you have any questions regarding this issu:, please contact me.
By {{letter dated|date=January 31, 1992|text=letter dated January 31, 1992}}, you responded to the GL, indicating that the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) procedures address time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and inverters or other onsite Iower sources that supply the vital instrumcnt buses (Generic issue 48). You also indichted that you have verified that CNS has no tie breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed your response to the GL and finJs that it meets the reporting requirements set forth in GL 91-11      This comp?etes the staff review of your GL response for C'lS and closes TAC No M82401. If you have any questions regarding this issu:, please contact me.
Sincerely, A/h Harry Rood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects - lil/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:    See next page
Sincerely, A/h Harry Rood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects - lil/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:    See next page


Line 108: Line 108:
On July 18, 1991, the NRC staff issued Generic Letter (GL) 91-11, " Resolution of Generic Issue 48, 'LCO's for Class lE Vital Instrument Buses,' and 49,-
On July 18, 1991, the NRC staff issued Generic Letter (GL) 91-11, " Resolution of Generic Issue 48, 'LCO's for Class lE Vital Instrument Buses,' and 49,-
           ' Interlocks and LCO's for Class IE Tie Breakers,' Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)." The GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which centain time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB), inverters or other onsite power sources for VIB, and tie breakers. If procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the reasons why the controls are not needed is requested.
           ' Interlocks and LCO's for Class IE Tie Breakers,' Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)." The GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which centain time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB), inverters or other onsite power sources for VIB, and tie breakers. If procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the reasons why the controls are not needed is requested.
By letter dated January 31, 1992, you responded to the GL, indicating that the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) procedures address time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and inverters or other onsite power sources that supply the vital instrument buses (Generic Issue 48). You also indicated that you have verified that CNS has no tie breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed your response to the GL and finds that it meets the reporting requirements set forth in GL 91-11. This completes the staff review of your GL response for CNS and closes TAC No. MS2401. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please contact me.
By {{letter dated|date=January 31, 1992|text=letter dated January 31, 1992}}, you responded to the GL, indicating that the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) procedures address time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and inverters or other onsite power sources that supply the vital instrument buses (Generic Issue 48). You also indicated that you have verified that CNS has no tie breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed your response to the GL and finds that it meets the reporting requirements set forth in GL 91-11. This completes the staff review of your GL response for CNS and closes TAC No. MS2401. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please contact me.
Sincerely, Harry Rood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:    See next page
Sincerely, Harry Rood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:    See next page



Latest revision as of 14:34, 22 August 2022

Discusses Closeout of Staff Review of Generic Ltr 91-11, Resolution of Generic Issue 48,' LCO for Class 1E Vital Instrument Buses' & 49, 'Interlocks & LCO for Class 1E Tie Breakers,' Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(f)
ML20126B156
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/09/1992
From: Rood H
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Horn G
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
References
REF-GTECI-048, REF-GTECI-049, REF-GTECI-NI, TASK-048, TASK-049, TASK-48, TASK-49, TASK-OR GL-91-11, TAC-M82401, NUDOCS 9212210427
Download: ML20126B156 (6)


Text

g< g m -

c e ,

--- g , ,.

=

-- - w - m.

+ _.

'L

,- $ Docket No. 50-2981 ' December 9, 1992 4% Mr; Guy lR.EHorn

~

z  : Ncclear: Power Group Ma' nager -.

-Nebraska ~Public Power District-

- Post Office Box 499 P Columbus, Nebraska 68602-0499 y

Dear Mr. Horn:

0'

SUBJECT:

CLOSE0VT OF STAFF REVIEW-0F GENERIC LETTER ~ol-ll FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION-(TAC NO..M82401)

L On ' July - 18, 1991, the-NRC staff issued Generic Letter.(GL) 91-11, " Resolution l of Generic -Issue 48, 'LC0's for Class u Vital Instrument Buses,' and 49,

' Interlocks and-LCO's for Class lE Tie Breakers,' Pursuant to 10 CFR

50. 54 ( f) . " The.GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which contain. time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB), inverters or other_onsite power sources for VIB,.and-tie, breakers. If. procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the
reasons why.the controls are not neeJed is requested.

By: letter dated January 31, 1992,'you responded to the GL, indicating that the y' Cooper Nuclear Station'(CNS) procedures address time limitations and '

. surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and= inverters or l other onsite power sources that= supply the vital instrument buses (Generic- ,

Issue 48). .You also indicated that you have verified that CNS:has no tie- 3 l breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed-your rAsponse- to the GL and finds that _it. meets the reporting requirements set  ;

cforth -in GL 91-11. This completes the -staff review of- your. GL response for-CNS and closes TAC No. M82401. If you have any questions regarding this.- ,

issue, please contact me.-

E Sincerely, a

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY: j Harry: Rood, Senior Proje'ct Manager ' '

Project Directorate !V-1 Division of Reactor = Projects _- III/IV/V Office of Nuclear. Reactor Regulation -i cc: ;Seelnext'page i

' DIST 11B JTON:

  • 19tek& N ty NRC &-Local PDRs PD4-1 Reading-

.M. Virgilio _

J. Larkins P. Noonan  ;

% 1ACRSe(10)J(P-315): _0GC (15818)-

'A. B.. Beach, RIV H m . .

PD4-1;P1 ant File - i lc 0FC- LAiPDA 'PM:PD4-l! ~0:PD4 H. Rood,

_ ' 'f. DLn ~

~ '

^ j pgg'

'NAME) :PNo'odrb HRood[ (n,s) JbGagliaido,RIV! -l

-DATE{ j9$/92- 1 % /92; 42 /[ /92 .

?0FFICl[LiRECORDCOPY:DocumentName: C0082401.LTR F s i n em r.

QD 5 byd bCMdj.hg y E z, 9212210427f921209' ?'

r- , m /PDR1 '

, ;4 '<

'. P -- ADO4 (p(3LOSOOO29FW

' tPDR-i QL - x =

~

j

s e m:g'o

'd /g UNITED STATES

[h 3 i s g

p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON D. C. 20555

  • ,, c

%, ' " ' / 1 December 9, 1992 Docket No. 50-298 l

Mr. Guy R. Horn j Nuclear Power Group Manager  ;

Nebraska Public 'ower District Post Office Box 499 Colutobas, Nebraska 68602-0499

Dear Mr. Horn:

SUBJECT:

CLOSE0VT OF STAFF REVIEW 0F GENERIC LETTER 91-11 FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION (TAC NO. M82401)

On July 18, 1991, the NRC staff issued Generic letter (GL) 91-11, " Resolution of Generic Issue 48, 'LCO's for Class lE Vital Instrument Buses,' and 49,

' Interlocks and LCO's for Class IE Tie Breakers,' Pursuar.t to 10 CFR

50. 54 ( f) . The GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which contain time limitations cnd survr:llance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB) inverters or other onsite power sources for VIB. and >

tie breakers. If procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the reasons why the controls are not needed is requested.

By letter dated January 31, 1992, you responded to the GL, indicating that the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) procedures address time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and inverters or other onsite Iower sources that supply the vital instrumcnt buses (Generic issue 48). You also indichted that you have verified that CNS has no tie breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed your response to the GL and finJs that it meets the reporting requirements set forth in GL 91-11 This comp?etes the staff review of your GL response for C'lS and closes TAC No M82401. If you have any questions regarding this issu:, please contact me.

Sincerely, A/h Harry Rood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects - lil/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page

.n . e _

LMr. Guy R.-Horn Nuclear Power Grcup Manager . Cooper Nuclear Station cc:

Mr. G. D. Watson, General Counsel Nebraska 'Public' Power District P, 0. Box 499 Columbus, Nebraska 68602-0499 Cooper Nuclear Station ATIN: Mr. John M. Meacham Site Manager P. O. Box 98 Brownville, Nebraska 68321 Randolph Wood, Director Nebraska Department of Environmental Control P. O. Box 98922 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-8922 Mr. Richard Moody, Chairman Nemtaa Couaty Board of Commissioners Nemaha County Courthouse 1824 N Street Auburn, Nebraska 68305 Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulitory Commission P. O. Box 218

.Brownville, Nebraska 68321 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Mr. Harold Borchert, Director Division of Radiological Health Nebraska Department of Health 301 Centennial Mall, South P. O. Box 95007 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-5007

7 ,

St rico er 'o UNITED STATES

! g/,' g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g g' // , tg WASHINo TON, D. C. 20555

[

December 9, 1992 Docket No. 50-298 Mr. Guy R. Horn Nuclear Power Group Manager Nebraska Public Power District Post Office Box 499 Columbus, Nebraska 68602-0499

Dear Mr. Horn:

SUBJECT:

CLOSE0VT OF STAFF REVIEW 0F GENERIC LETTER 91-11 FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION (TAC NO. M82401)

On July 18, 1991, the NRC staff issued Generic Letter (GL) 91-11, " Resolution of Generic Issue 48, 'LCO's for Class lE Vital Instrument Buses,' and 49,-

' Interlocks and LCO's for Class IE Tie Breakers,' Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)." The GL requested that licensees certify that procedures exist which centain time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrument buses (VIB), inverters or other onsite power sources for VIB, and tie breakers. If procedures do not exist, a justification demonstrating the reasons why the controls are not needed is requested.

By letter dated January 31, 1992, you responded to the GL, indicating that the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) procedures address time limitations and surveillance requirements for vital instrumentation buses, and inverters or other onsite power sources that supply the vital instrument buses (Generic Issue 48). You also indicated that you have verified that CNS has no tie breakers of the type discussed in the GL. The NRC staff has reviewed your response to the GL and finds that it meets the reporting requirements set forth in GL 91-11. This completes the staff review of your GL response for CNS and closes TAC No. MS2401. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please contact me.

Sincerely, Harry Rood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page

Mr. Guy R. Horn Nuclear Power Group Manager Cooper Nuclear Station ec:

Mr. G. D. Watson, General Counsel Nebraska Public Power District P. O. Box 499 Columbus, Nebraska 68602-0499 Cooper Nuclear Station ATTN: Mr. John M. Meacham Site Manager P. O. Box 98 Brownville, Nebraska 68321 _

Randolph Wood, Director Nebraska Departmer,t of Environmental Control P. O. Box 98922 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-8922 Mr. Richard Moody, Chairman Nemaba County Board of Commissioners Nemaha County Courthouse 1824 N Street Auburn, Nebraska 68305 Senior Resident inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 218 Brownville, Nebraska 68321 Regional Administrator, Region IV _

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Mr. Harold Borchert, Director Division of Radiological Health Nebraska Department of Health 301 Centennial Mall, South P. O. Box 9500'/

Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-5007

_ _ --