ML20062A185: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20062A185
| number = ML20062A185
| issue date = 08/30/1978
| issue date = 08/30/1978
| title = Responds to 780717 NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Inspec Repts#50-324/78-14 & #50-325/78-14.Corrective Actions:Rev Checklist Added to Chlorination Log & Level Limits Added to Log Checklists
| title = Responds to 780717 NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Inspec Repts 50-324/78-14 & 50-325/78-14.Corrective Actions:Rev Checklist Added to Chlorination Log & Level Limits Added to Log Checklists
| author name = Banks H
| author name = Banks H
| author affiliation = CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.

Latest revision as of 19:18, 1 June 2023

Responds to 780717 NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Inspec Repts 50-324/78-14 & 50-325/78-14.Corrective Actions:Rev Checklist Added to Chlorination Log & Level Limits Added to Log Checklists
ML20062A185
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/30/1978
From: Banks H
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19294A330 List:
References
NUDOCS 7810110242
Download: ML20062A185 (3)


Text

.

~. >p ."r ',}

. - 2 Caro!ina Power & Light Ccmpany Augusc 30, 1978 6

File: NG-3513(B) Serial: GD-78-2186 t Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II ,

101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLAhT, UNIT NOS.1 & 2 LICENSE N0. DPR-62 AND DPR-71 DOCKET NO. 50-324 AND 50-325 RESPONSE TO I WRACTION OF NRC REQUIREMEhTS

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

In your letter of July 17, 1978, you forwarded a copy of IE Inspection Report 50-324/78-14 and 50-325/78-14 for the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. I and 2. We have reviewed this report and find that it does not contain any information of a proprietary nature.

The report identified three items that appear to deviate from requirements to the NRC. As noted in your letter, corrective actions to prevent recurrence were completed for Item C prior to conclusion of this inspection. Therefore, a written statement or explanation in reply to Item C was not included in our response to this I.E. Report.

The long delay in the Carolina Power & Light Company response to this re 'rt was due to an internal misinterpretation with regard to the chlorination averaging period and our attempts to resolve this misinterpretation within the Company.

Deficiency:

Appendix B Technical Specification 2.2.1 states that "the concentration of free available chlorine shall not exceed a maximum instantaneous value of 0.5 mg/l nor an average value of 0.2 mg/l during the chlorination periods conducted in a calendar day.

Contrary to the above, on March 14 and 16,1978, rhe average free available chlorine values during the chlorination periods were 0.21 g eg/2 and 0.23 mg/2, respectively.

~7 31 di19'J'O

\ pp kbccx 4 DIR frQCCX-

. SV 9,0

  • 3W'1 D?s w - . - --- _

6 i 5 . .n m 3:3 Fayw"e.,,ce S:w . 3 C 3 x 25 . ;4em. ?!. O. 27C

- .-- a . . < . ~3 I