ML071570124: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/24/2007
| issue date = 05/24/2007
| title = E-MAIL: (NPA-PD) Cost Benefit Equation Terms
| title = E-MAIL: (NPA-PD) Cost Benefit Equation Terms
| author name = Palla R L
| author name = Palla R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRA/DRA
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRA/DRA
| addressee name = Bixler N E
| addressee name = Bixler N
| addressee affiliation = Sandia National Labs (SNL)
| addressee affiliation = Sandia National Labs (SNL)
| docket = 05000293
| docket = 05000293
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I..... -- .. -- .- -. --I I Kobert Palla -RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms Pa ge1 From: Robert Palla To: Nathan E Bixler Date: 05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM  
{{#Wiki_filter:I..... -- ..   --       .-           -.   -                                                                           -     I I Kobert Palla - RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms                                                                           Page1 From:               Robert Palla To:                 Nathan E Bixler Date:               05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms Nate -this is covered in Section 5.7.1 of NUREG/BR-0184 (which I had included in the box of documents I sent at the outset of project), and it is also described in Section G.6.1 of our SAMA evaluation for Pilgrim (page G-30), and in the licensee's Environmental Report/SAMA submittal.
RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms Nate - this is covered in Section 5.7.1 of NUREG/BR-0184 (which I had included in the box of documents I sent at the outset of project), and it is also described in Section G.6.1 of our SAMA evaluation for Pilgrim (page G-30), and in the licensee's Environmental Report/SAMA submittal. Joe should have all of these.
Joe should have all of these.Essentially, the cost (or averted cost if one is looking at an improvement)  
Essentially, the cost (or averted cost if one is looking at an improvement) = the annual reduction in public exposure (in person-rem per year) x $2000 per person-rem x present value conversion factor (e.g., the factor is 10.76 for a 20-year period with a 7-percent discount rate.) Bob
= the annual reduction in public exposure (in person-rem per year) x $2000 per person-rem x present value conversion factor (e.g., the factor is 10.76 for a 20-year period with a 7-percent discount rate.) Bob>>> "Bixler, Nathan E" <nbixler@sandia.gov>
              >>> "Bixler, Nathan E" <nbixler@sandia.gov> 05/24/2007 12:08 PM >>>
05/24/2007 12:08 PM >>>Bob, What is the formula for calculating the cost related to offsite radiation exposure?Nate----- Original Message -----From: Robert Palla [mailto:RLP3(,nrc.qov]
Bob, What is the formula for calculating the cost related to offsite radiation exposure?
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 5:10 AM To: Jones, Joe A Cc: Bixler, Nathan E  
Nate
              ----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Palla [mailto:RLP3(,nrc.qov]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 5:10 AM To: Jones, Joe A Cc: Bixler, Nathan E


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Cost Benefit Equation Terms Joe -I am not sure whether I had provided you with this table previously.
Cost Benefit Equation Terms Joe - I am not sure whether I had provided you with this table previously. It shows how each of the terms in the cost benefit equation are derived, and their relative significance for Pilgrim. Bob CC:               jojones@sandia.gov
It shows how each of the terms in the cost benefit equation are derived, and their relative significance for Pilgrim. Bob CC: jojones@sandia.gov c:\ternV\GW}OOOO1 .TMP PageI e l Mail Envelope Properties (4655DD09.E21  
 
:18: 10412)
c:\ternV\GW}OOOO1 .TMP                                                                                 PageIe l Mail Envelope Properties     (4655DD09.E21 :18: 10412)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Creation Date From: Created By: RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms 05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM Robert Palla RLP3@nrc.gov Recipients sandia.gov PM jojones CC (ojones@sandia.gov) nbixler (Nathan E Bixler)Action Transferred Date & Time 05/24/2007 2:44:52 Post Office Files MESSAGE Options Auto Delete: Expiration Date: Notify Recipients:
RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms Creation Date          05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM From:                  Robert Palla Created By:            RLP3@nrc.gov Recipients                                         Action              Date & Time sandia.gov                                       Transferred          05/24/2007 2:44:52 PM jojones CC (ojones@sandia.gov) nbixler (Nathan E Bixler)
Priority: ReplyRequested:
Post Office                                        Delivered            Route sandia.gov Files                            Size              Date & Time MESSAGE                        2097              05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM Options Auto Delete:                   No Expiration Date:               None Notify Recipients:             Yes Priority:                       Standard ReplyRequested:                 No Return Notification:           None Concealed  
Return Notification:
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Security: To Be Delivered:
No Security:                       Standard To Be Delivered:               Immediate Status Tracking:               Delivered & Opened}}
Status Tracking: Delivered Route sandia.gov Size 2097 Date & Time 05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM No None Yes Standard No None No Standard Immediate Delivered
& Opened}}

Latest revision as of 06:36, 23 November 2019

E-MAIL: (NPA-PD) Cost Benefit Equation Terms
ML071570124
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 05/24/2007
From: Palla R
NRC/NRR/ADRA/DRA
To: Bixler N
Sandia
References
TAC MD3698
Download: ML071570124 (2)


Text

I..... -- .. -- .- -. - - I I Kobert Palla - RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms Page1 From: Robert Palla To: Nathan E Bixler Date: 05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM

Subject:

RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms Nate - this is covered in Section 5.7.1 of NUREG/BR-0184 (which I had included in the box of documents I sent at the outset of project), and it is also described in Section G.6.1 of our SAMA evaluation for Pilgrim (page G-30), and in the licensee's Environmental Report/SAMA submittal. Joe should have all of these.

Essentially, the cost (or averted cost if one is looking at an improvement) = the annual reduction in public exposure (in person-rem per year) x $2000 per person-rem x present value conversion factor (e.g., the factor is 10.76 for a 20-year period with a 7-percent discount rate.) Bob

>>> "Bixler, Nathan E" <nbixler@sandia.gov> 05/24/2007 12:08 PM >>>

Bob, What is the formula for calculating the cost related to offsite radiation exposure?

Nate


Original Message -----

From: Robert Palla [1]

Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 5:10 AM To: Jones, Joe A Cc: Bixler, Nathan E

Subject:

Cost Benefit Equation Terms Joe - I am not sure whether I had provided you with this table previously. It shows how each of the terms in the cost benefit equation are derived, and their relative significance for Pilgrim. Bob CC: jojones@sandia.gov

c:\ternV\GW}OOOO1 .TMP PageIe l Mail Envelope Properties (4655DD09.E21 :18: 10412)

Subject:

RE: Cost Benefit Equation Terms Creation Date 05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM From: Robert Palla Created By: RLP3@nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time sandia.gov Transferred 05/24/2007 2:44:52 PM jojones CC (ojones@sandia.gov) nbixler (Nathan E Bixler)

Post Office Delivered Route sandia.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2097 05/24/2007 2:44:25 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened