ML19326A568: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
                                           $I >>
                                           $I >>
I I 2
I I 2
NS  in~.iT  ~, [[U, ,i i R12 19 10 I
NS  in~.iT  ~, ((U, ,i i R12 19 10 I
[NJ caust otScais tion g
[NJ caust otScais tion g
l Suction pressure indicator and flow transmitter were out of calibration.
l Suction pressure indicator and flow transmitter were out of calibration.
Line 66: Line 66:
                 @ elNA                                                .
                 @ elNA                                                .
                                                                           -                                                                                                                                                  l ADOstso=At s ACTORS l              @lu 1      es                                        .
                                                                           -                                                                                                                                                  l ADOstso=At s ACTORS l              @lu 1      es                                        .
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ;
O IT[qiy._                                                                                                                                                                                                      ,
O IT[qiy._                                                                                                                                                                                                      ,
3 s:                                                                                                                                                                                                  -y
3 s:                                                                                                                                                                                                  -y
Line 90: Line 89:
Correct'ive Action: After recalibration of the pressure indicators, the surveil-lance test was performed at 1600 hours en .Miy 12, 1977, and the pump met the                                                  - - - -
Correct'ive Action: After recalibration of the pressure indicators, the surveil-lance test was performed at 1600 hours en .Miy 12, 1977, and the pump met the                                                  - - - -
acceptance criteria. This removed the plant from the Action Statement of Techni-cal Specification 3.6.2.1. To prevent recurrence, the calibration frequency g                        will be increased as necessary to insure that these instruments remain within i                        their tolerances.
acceptance criteria. This removed the plant from the Action Statement of Techni-cal Specification 3.6.2.1. To prevent recurrence, the calibration frequency g                        will be increased as necessary to insure that these instruments remain within i                        their tolerances.
;
Failure Data: No previous similar events have occurred.
Failure Data: No previous similar events have occurred.
t
t

Latest revision as of 01:26, 16 March 2020

RO NP-33-77-21:on 770711,during Monthly Surveillance Test, Containment Spray Pump 1-1 Failed to Meet Pump Head Acceptance Criteria.Caused by Suction Pressure Indicator & Flow Transmitter Found Out of Calibr.Parts Recalibr
ML19326A568
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/04/1977
From: Batch S, Lingenfelter J
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19326A527 List:
References
NUDOCS 8002040742
Download: ML19326A568 (2)


Text

- . . . - . . .

. t

,m

~

' O. ' ~

1.lCENSE E E'.'ENT R EPORT s

cominot stocs - Lj i f lj G

  • ** t "' I L't"),g" LeCCNSC measuot a 3"," "g' l0;Oj-J 0101 Ni P FI-101 3l -l 4 11l1 l 1! 1; l 0l3 l

@]9IolH l DIB l Sill4. - 35 Jb .N Jo JPA C A t t Co# O te s cocett f aevaset a g gg m e ria s aC* oat cas t 0: com it i I 1L l LLs to t S i c i ..i : 03 :4 : 6, t1071,1,77 . 0i 8; 0 4,7 ; 7, si !4 '3r E' si 64 ss 2. is ao tvtuf of SCaiP1 TON g lDuring the Containment Spray System Monthly Surye111ance Testl Containment

> as so glSprayPump1-1failedtomeetpumpheadacceptancecriteria.l Pressure  ;

a es a g lwas above the maximum acceptable limit. This is not a repetitive  ;

7 es .

E i es Ioccurrence. (NP-33-77-21) .  ;

ao

    • l. I i

- I 5 '"'c' en CNdE'h"' old'Oryc",'",,'c, ,,,,a,.

@. l.N""I

$I >>

I I 2

NS in~.iT ~, ((U, ,i i R12 19 10 I

[NJ caust otScais tion g

l Suction pressure indicator and flow transmitter were out of calibration.

_ _ . _ l s

gg'Theywererecalibratedandthepumpthenmettheacceptancecriteria. u l

\ =

gl -

J s as M

I

  1. g"s#'

a s so tog a status pe's Yav DescovCav nESCnervoom I DI 01 1.A l (pj ( NA J 3 to s2 13 .4 .t 46 80 at ofNe'$NC auovast or acievetv Lof.A1no*e o' mL LCasC

@, . [ Zj l_NA l

[M-Z .. . l,NA I

PtnSoNNE L E X PO5Umt5

... o.,,C..... m RI,'uge,3 ' ' , , ' l!*)

L "^

~~

PtnSoNastt tNJumis J

munseC m nt sc a.ev som , .

O I Ol 01 I NA -

g

.i u --

08 FSI1E con 58OutNCE5

  • . N LOSS 084 OAnanGL TO F AcILif v .

s vet otsc a se viom

@,VJ i.8^ ~,

. J -

PUtteCIf? .

@ elNA .

- l ADOstso=At s ACTORS l @lu 1 es .

O IT[qiy._ ,

3 s: -y

,,,, Jacque Lingenfelter/Stan Batch (4197'259-5000, Ext. 251 8 0 02 0~ **4 034>

~

~

m ~

~ -

s . .

TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY

, k./

  • DAVIS-BESSE UNIT ONE NL* CLEAR PO'ER STATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR LER NP-33-77-21 DATE OF EVENT: July 11, 1977 FACILITY: Davis-Besse Unit 1 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRE' ICE: Failure of Containment Spray Pump 1-1 to meet pump head acceptance criteria.

e Conditions Prior to O'currene_e_: The plant was in Mode 4 with Power (MWT) = 0

. and Load (M'K) = 0.

Description of Occurrence: On July 11, 1977, at 0005 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />, Operations per-

~ ~ " ~ ~

sonnel performed ST 5062.01, Containment Spray System Monthly Test, during which Containment Spray Pump 1-1 failed to meet the pump head acceptance cri-teria. The pump differential pressure _was 180.8 psid which is above the maxi-mum acceptance criteria of 179.5 psid. This placed the plant in the Action Statement of Technical Specification 3.6.2.1.

h-

. Designation of Apparent Cause of Occurrence: After investigation, it was found that the suction pressure indicator, PI-1591 and flow transmitter, FT-1547 were out of calibration. This was the reason that the indicated pump performance data exceeded its acceptance criteria.

Analysis of Occurrenca: Since the pump would have met its required flowrate under accident conditions, there was no threat to the health and safety of the i

l public or station personnel.

Correct'ive Action: After recalibration of the pressure indicators, the surveil-lance test was performed at 1600 hours0.0185 days <br />0.444 hours <br />0.00265 weeks <br />6.088e-4 months <br /> en .Miy 12, 1977, and the pump met the - - - -

acceptance criteria. This removed the plant from the Action Statement of Techni-cal Specification 3.6.2.1. To prevent recurrence, the calibration frequency g will be increased as necessary to insure that these instruments remain within i their tolerances.

Failure Data: No previous similar events have occurred.

t

~(

l'

._ . . _ . . _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ , . - . _ _ , _ _ . _ - _ . . _ _ . - - _ _ _ . - , . _ . _ . - _ . .