ML18331A402: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 160 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is September 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::160 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is September 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:08, 6 March 2020
| ML18331A402 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 11/27/2018 |
| From: | John Lamb Special Projects and Process Branch |
| To: | David Helker Exelon Corp |
| References | |
| L-2018-LLA-0304 | |
| Download: ML18331A402 (2) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Lamb, John Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 2:23 PM To: 'david.helker@exeloncorp.com' Cc: Richard.Gropp@exeloncorp.com; Bonnett, Frederick Paul:(GenCo-Nuc); Dostal, Jeffrey Paul:(GenCo-Nuc)
Subject:
Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek License Amendment Request to Remove Cyber Security Plan Requirements (EPID: L-2018-LLA-0304)
Importance: High
Dear Mr. Helker:
By letter dated November 12, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML18317A022), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The proposed LAR would remove the existing Cyber Security Plan (CSP) requirements contained in License Condition 2.C.(4) of the Oyster Creek Renewed Facility Operating License and removal of the commitment to fully implement the CSP by the Milestone 8 commitment date of August 31, 2021 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17289A222).
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 160 hours6.667 days <br />0.952 weeks <br />0.219 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is September 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Special Projects and Process Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 684 Mail Envelope Properties (John.Lamb@nrc.gov20181127142200)
Subject:
Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek License Amendment Request to Remove Cyber Security Plan Requirements (EPID: L-2018-LLA-0304)
Sent Date: 11/27/2018 2:22:59 PM Received Date: 11/27/2018 2:22:00 PM From: Lamb, John Created By: John.Lamb@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Richard.Gropp@exeloncorp.com" <Richard.Gropp@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Bonnett, Frederick Paul:(GenCo-Nuc)" <Frederick.Bonnett@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Dostal, Jeffrey Paul:(GenCo-Nuc)" <Jeffrey.Dostal@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'david.helker@exeloncorp.com'" <david.helker@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3014 11/27/2018 2:22:00 PM Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: