ML11263A273: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11263A273
| number = ML11263A273
| issue date = 08/17/2011
| issue date = 08/17/2011
| title = 2011/08/17 Indian Point Lr Hearing - IPEC - Requested Comments on Recent Entergy NRC Telecons
| title = Lr Hearing - IPEC - Requested Comments on Recent Entergy NRC Telecons
| author name = Waters R M
| author name = Waters R
| author affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| author affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| addressee name = Kuntz R F
| addressee name = Kuntz R
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR/RPB1
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR/RPB1
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 Stuyvenberg, Andrew From: Waters, Roger M. [rwater1@entergy.com]
{{#Wiki_filter:Stuyvenberg, Andrew From:                     Waters, Roger M. [rwater1@entergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 8:17 AM To: Kuntz, Robert Cc: COX, ALAN B; Curry, John J; Caput o, Charles; Walpole, Robert W
Sent:                     Wednesday, August 17, 2011 8:17 AM To:                       Kuntz, Robert Cc:                       COX, ALAN B; Curry, John J; Caputo, Charles; Walpole, Robert W


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
IPEC - Requested Comments on Recent Entergy/NRC Telecons Attachments:
IPEC - Requested Comments on Recent Entergy/NRC Telecons Attachments:               Telecon Summary 7-21-11.docx; Telecon Summary 7-25-1.docx; Telecon Summary 8-3-11.docx
Telecon Summary 7-21-11.docx; Telecon Summary 7-25-1.docx; Telecon Summary 8-3-11.docx Rob, Attached are the subject comments.
: Rob, Attached are the subject comments.
Roger Waters IPEC Licensing 914-827-7714
Roger Waters IPEC Licensing 914-827-7714
<<Telecon Summary 7-21-11.docx>> <<Telecon Summary 7-25-1.docx>> <<Telecon Summary 8-3-11.docx>>  
<<Telecon Summary 7-21-11.docx>> <<Telecon Summary 7-25-1.docx>> <<Telecon Summary 8-3-11.docx>>
1


LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.  
LICENSEE:       Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.                                                 Field Code Changed FACILITY:       Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
 
FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 21, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 21, 2011, to discuss the applicant's response to request for additional information B.0.4-1 which was provided in a letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML11201A160). The staff questioned the applicant on why the response did not include an Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) supplement as required by Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 54.21(d). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and provide an a discussion for the UFSAR supplement as needed. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.  
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 21, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 21, 2011, to discuss the applicants response to request for additional information B.0.4-1 which was provided in a letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML11201A160). The staff questioned the applicant on why the response did not include an Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) supplement as required by Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 54.21(d). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and provide an a discussion for the UFSAR supplement as needed.
 
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
 
Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286  


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==


List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv Field Code Changed
List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv


ML11215A056   *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1* PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey SFigueroa RKuntz DATE 08/3/2011 08/     /2011 08/     /2011 08/     /2011 08/     /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August XX, 2011  
ML11215A056                                   *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE     LA: DLR/RPB1*     PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME       SFigueroa         RKuntz             DMorey           SFigueroa       RKuntz DATE       08/3/2011         08/   /2011       08/ /2011       08/   /2011     08/   /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August XX, 2011


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 21, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DISTRIBUTION
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 21, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DISTRIBUTION:                                                                         Field Code Changed HARD COPY:
: HARD COPY: DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource ------------- AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI  
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource AStuyvenberg           GMeyer, RI RAuluck                 RConte, RI BPham                   JBoska DPelton                 DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal                 NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI           PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC           NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC             BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA           OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA         MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA             MHalter, RI


Field Code Changed ENCLOSURE  TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 21, 2011
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 21, 2011 PARTICIPANTS:                          AFFILIATIONS:
Robert F. Kuntz                        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Bo Pham                                NRC Matthew Homiack                        NRC Mike Stroud                            Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Alan Cox                                Entergy Ted Ivy                                Entergy Andy Andrew Taylor                      Entergy David Lach                              Entergy Comment [r2]: Ettlinger Alan Ettlinger                          Entergy John Curry                              Entergy Charlie Caputo                          Entergy Paul Bode                              Entergy Charles B. Rokes                        Entergy ENCLOSURE


PARTICIPANTS
LICENSEE:       Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
: AFFILIATIONS
FACILITY:       Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
:Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Re gulator y Commission (NRC)Bo Pham NRCMatthew Homiack NRC Mike Stroud Enter gy Nuclear O perations, Inc. 
(Entergy)Alan Cox Enter gyTed Iv y Enter gy And y Andrew Ta ylor Enter gyDavid Lach Enter gyAlan Ett l in g er Enter gyJohn Curr y Enter gyCharlie Ca puto Enter gyPaul Bode Enter gyCharles B. Rokes Enter gy  Comment [r2]: Ettlinger 
 
LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.  
 
FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 25, 2011, to discuss the applicant's letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11201A160). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on Commitment 42.
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 25, 2011, to discuss the applicants letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11201A160). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on Commitment 42.
Commitment 42 contains two options for developing a plan for each unit to address the potential for cracking of the primary to secondary pressure boundary due to PWSCC of tube-to-tubesheet welds. The two options were to either perform an analysis or inspect the welds. The staff questioned the applicant on the implementation schedule for the two options. The applicant's letter proposed to do the analysis for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 several years after the implementation schedule for the inspections. The staff questioned the applicant on how the proposed implementation was acceptable since the analysis would need to be completed in order to support not completing the inspection. The staff also noted that the implementation schedule for Commitment 43 was extended 10 years for each unit from the previous letter which was dated March 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110960360). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise commitments as needed.  
Commitment 42 contains two options for developing a plan for each unit to address the potential for cracking of the primary to secondary pressure boundary due to PWSCC of tube-to-tubesheet welds. The two options were to either perform an analysis or inspect the welds. The staff questioned the applicant on the implementation schedule for the two options. The applicants letter proposed to do the analysis for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 several years after the implementation schedule for the inspections. The staff questioned the applicant on how the proposed implementation was acceptable since the analysis would need to be completed in order to support not completing the inspection. The staff also noted that the implementation schedule for Commitment 43 was extended 10 years for each unit from the previous letter which was dated March 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110960360). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise commitments as needed.
 
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.  
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
 
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
 
Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286  


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==


List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv


FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3  
LICENSEE:      Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
FACILITY:       Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 25, 2011, to discuss the applicant's letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11201A160). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on Commitment 42.
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 25, 2011, to discuss the applicants letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11201A160). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on Commitment 42.
Commitment 42 contains two options for developing a plan for each unit to address the potential for cracking of the primary to secondary pressure boundary due to PWSCC of tube-to-tubesheet welds. The two options were to either perform an analysis or inspect the welds. The staff questioned the applicant on the implementation schedule for the two options. The applicant's letter proposed to do the analysis for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 several years after the implementation schedule for the inspections. The staff questioned the applicant on how the proposed implementation was acceptable since the analysis would need to be completed in order to support not completing the inspection. The staff also noted that the implementation schedule for Commitment 43 was extended 10 years for each unit from the previous letter which was dated March 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110960360). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise commitments as needed.  
Commitment 42 contains two options for developing a plan for each unit to address the potential for cracking of the primary to secondary pressure boundary due to PWSCC of tube-to-tubesheet welds. The two options were to either perform an analysis or inspect the welds. The staff questioned the applicant on the implementation schedule for the two options. The applicants letter proposed to do the analysis for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 several years after the implementation schedule for the inspections. The staff questioned the applicant on how the proposed implementation was acceptable since the analysis would need to be completed in order to support not completing the inspection. The staff also noted that the implementation schedule for Commitment 43 was extended 10 years for each unit from the previous letter which was dated March 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110960360). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise commitments as needed.
 
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.  
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
 
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
 
Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286  


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
List of Participants 


cc w/encl: Listserv  
List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
See next page ADAMS Accession No.: ML11215A088                                    *concurrence via e-mail


DISTRIBUTION
Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August XX, 2011
:  See next page
 
ADAMS Accession No.:  ML11215A088    *concurrence via e-mail OFFICELA:DLR/RPB1*
PM:DLR/RPB1 BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM:DLR/RPB1 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August XX, 2011  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3  
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource AStuyvenberg            GMeyer, RI RAuluck                RConte, RI BPham                  JBoska DPelton                DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal                  NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI            PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC            NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC              BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA          OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA          MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA            MHalter, RI


DISTRIBUTION
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 25, 2011 PARTICIPANTS:                           AFFILIATIONS:
: HARD COPY: DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource
Robert F. Kuntz                          U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Bo Pham                                  NRC Allen Hiser                              NRC Rachel Voucher                          NRC On Yee                                  NRC Alan Cox                                Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Charles B. Rokes                        Entergy


RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource
LICENSEE:       Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.                                               Field Code Changed FACILITY:       Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
 
RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource
 
RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource
 
RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource
 
RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource
-------------
AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI
 
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 25, 2011
 
PARTICIPANTS
: AFFILIATIONS
:Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Re g ulator y Commission (NRC)Bo Pham NRC A llen Hise r NRCRachel Vouche r NRCOn Yee NRC Alan Cox Enter gy Nuclear O p erations, Inc.
(Enter gy)Charles B. Rokes Enter gy
 
LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.  
 
FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-BOTAGE CABLE PROGRA FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on August 3, 2011 to discuss the applicant's letter dated July 27, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11215A128). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on the UFSAR revisions in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22. The staff was unclear if the revised Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as described in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22 would include event driven inspections (such as heavy rain or flooding). The applicant indicated that the periodic inspections completed as part of the Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would be determined based on operating experience. The staff indicated that Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would have to ensure that water accumulation would not submerge underground cables for more than a few days and that even if periodic inspections were done frequently, if there they were not accomplished when the cables are most likely to be submerged
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-BOTAGE CABLE PROGRA FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on August 3, 2011 to discuss the applicants letter dated July 27, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11215A128). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on the UFSAR revisions in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22. The staff was unclear if the revised Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as described in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22 would include event driven inspections (such as heavy rain or flooding). The applicant indicated that the periodic inspections completed as part of the Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would be determined based on operating experience. The staff indicated that Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would have to ensure that water accumulation would not submerge underground cables for more than a few days and that even if periodic inspections were done frequently, if there they were not accomplished when the cables are most likely to be submerged, then there was a potential that the cables could be would be exposed to an environment that they were not design to withstandsubmerged for more than a few days. The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise the p Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as needed.
, then there was a potential that the cables could be would be exposed to an environment that they were not design to withstandsubmerged for more than a few days. The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise the p Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as needed.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.  
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 ENCLOSURE:
 
List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
 
Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286  
 
ENCLOSURE: List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv Field Code Changed


        *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1* PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey SFigueroa RKuntz DATE 08/     /2011 08/     /2011 08/     /2011 08/     /2011 08/     /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August 3, 2011  
                                                *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE     LA: DLR/RPB1*       PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME       SFigueroa           RKuntz           DMorey           SFigueroa       RKuntz DATE       08/     /2011       08/   /2011     08/ /2011       08/   /2011     08/   /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August 3, 2011


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DISTRIBUTION
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING           Comment [r5]: Correct title STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DISTRIBUTION:                                                                       Field Code Changed HARD COPY:
: HARD COPY: DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource -------------
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI  
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource AStuyvenberg           GMeyer, RI RAuluck                 RConte, RI BPham                   JBoska DPelton                 DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal                 NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI           PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC           NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC             BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA           OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA         MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA             MHalter, RI
 
Comment [r5]: Correct title Field Code Changed ENCLOSURE  TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AUGUST 3, 2011
 
PARTICIPANTS
: AFFILIATIONS
:Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Re gulator y Commission (NRC)Cliff Doutt NRCAlan Cox Enter gy Nuclear O perations, Inc.
(Enter gy)Robert Waters Enter gyCharlie Ca puto Enter gySteve Manzione Enter gyLou Lubrano Enter gyMike Stroud Enter gy Ro ger Rucker Enter gy


Comment [r6]: Roger}}
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AUGUST 3, 2011 PARTICIPANTS:                          AFFILIATIONS:
Robert F. Kuntz                        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Cliff Doutt                            NRC Alan Cox                                Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Comment [r6]: Roger Robert Waters                          Entergy Charlie Caputo                          Entergy Steve Manzione                          Entergy Lou Lubrano                            Entergy Mike Stroud                            Entergy Roger Rucker                            Entergy ENCLOSURE}}

Latest revision as of 00:00, 7 February 2020

Lr Hearing - IPEC - Requested Comments on Recent Entergy NRC Telecons
ML11263A273
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/17/2011
From: Waters R
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To: Robert Kuntz
License Renewal Projects Branch 1
References
Download: ML11263A273 (13)


Text

Stuyvenberg, Andrew From: Waters, Roger M. [rwater1@entergy.com]

Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 8:17 AM To: Kuntz, Robert Cc: COX, ALAN B; Curry, John J; Caputo, Charles; Walpole, Robert W

Subject:

IPEC - Requested Comments on Recent Entergy/NRC Telecons Attachments: Telecon Summary 7-21-11.docx; Telecon Summary 7-25-1.docx; Telecon Summary 8-3-11.docx

Rob, Attached are the subject comments.

Roger Waters IPEC Licensing 914-827-7714

<<Telecon Summary 7-21-11.docx>> <<Telecon Summary 7-25-1.docx>> <<Telecon Summary 8-3-11.docx>>

1

LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Field Code Changed FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 21, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 21, 2011, to discuss the applicants response to request for additional information B.0.4-1 which was provided in a letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML11201A160). The staff questioned the applicant on why the response did not include an Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) supplement as required by Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 54.21(d). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and provide an a discussion for the UFSAR supplement as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv

ML11215A056 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1* PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey SFigueroa RKuntz DATE 08/3/2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August XX, 2011

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 21, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DISTRIBUTION: Field Code Changed HARD COPY:

DLR R/F E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 21, 2011 PARTICIPANTS: AFFILIATIONS:

Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Bo Pham NRC Matthew Homiack NRC Mike Stroud Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)

Alan Cox Entergy Ted Ivy Entergy Andy Andrew Taylor Entergy David Lach Entergy Comment [r2]: Ettlinger Alan Ettlinger Entergy John Curry Entergy Charlie Caputo Entergy Paul Bode Entergy Charles B. Rokes Entergy ENCLOSURE

LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 25, 2011, to discuss the applicants letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11201A160). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on Commitment 42.

Commitment 42 contains two options for developing a plan for each unit to address the potential for cracking of the primary to secondary pressure boundary due to PWSCC of tube-to-tubesheet welds. The two options were to either perform an analysis or inspect the welds. The staff questioned the applicant on the implementation schedule for the two options. The applicants letter proposed to do the analysis for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 several years after the implementation schedule for the inspections. The staff questioned the applicant on how the proposed implementation was acceptable since the analysis would need to be completed in order to support not completing the inspection. The staff also noted that the implementation schedule for Commitment 43 was extended 10 years for each unit from the previous letter which was dated March 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110960360). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise commitments as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv

LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 25, 2011, to discuss the applicants letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11201A160). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on Commitment 42.

Commitment 42 contains two options for developing a plan for each unit to address the potential for cracking of the primary to secondary pressure boundary due to PWSCC of tube-to-tubesheet welds. The two options were to either perform an analysis or inspect the welds. The staff questioned the applicant on the implementation schedule for the two options. The applicants letter proposed to do the analysis for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 several years after the implementation schedule for the inspections. The staff questioned the applicant on how the proposed implementation was acceptable since the analysis would need to be completed in order to support not completing the inspection. The staff also noted that the implementation schedule for Commitment 43 was extended 10 years for each unit from the previous letter which was dated March 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110960360). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise commitments as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

See next page ADAMS Accession No.: ML11215A088 *concurrence via e-mail

Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August XX, 2011

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR R/F E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 25, 2011 PARTICIPANTS: AFFILIATIONS:

Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Bo Pham NRC Allen Hiser NRC Rachel Voucher NRC On Yee NRC Alan Cox Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)

Charles B. Rokes Entergy

LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Field Code Changed FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-BOTAGE CABLE PROGRA FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on August 3, 2011 to discuss the applicants letter dated July 27, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11215A128). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on the UFSAR revisions in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22. The staff was unclear if the revised Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as described in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22 would include event driven inspections (such as heavy rain or flooding). The applicant indicated that the periodic inspections completed as part of the Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would be determined based on operating experience. The staff indicated that Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would have to ensure that water accumulation would not submerge underground cables for more than a few days and that even if periodic inspections were done frequently, if there they were not accomplished when the cables are most likely to be submerged, then there was a potential that the cables could be would be exposed to an environment that they were not design to withstandsubmerged for more than a few days. The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise the p Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 ENCLOSURE:

List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv

  • concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1* PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey SFigueroa RKuntz DATE 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August 3, 2011

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING Comment [r5]: Correct title STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DISTRIBUTION: Field Code Changed HARD COPY:

DLR R/F E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AUGUST 3, 2011 PARTICIPANTS: AFFILIATIONS:

Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Cliff Doutt NRC Alan Cox Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)

Comment [r6]: Roger Robert Waters Entergy Charlie Caputo Entergy Steve Manzione Entergy Lou Lubrano Entergy Mike Stroud Entergy Roger Rucker Entergy ENCLOSURE