ML071020505: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I Alicia Williamson  
{{#Wiki_filter:I Alicia Williamson - EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule                                               Page I11 From:             "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff@entergy.com>
-EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Page I11 From: "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff@entergy.com>
To:               <arwl @nrc.gov>
To: <arwl @nrc.gov>Date: 03/21/2007 3:19:50 PM  
Date:             03/21/2007 3:19:50 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Alicia: As a follow up to our conversation of yesterday, attached for your information is an EPA memo from Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Administrator, to the Regional Administrators, informing them that the 316(b) rule should be considered suspended.
EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Alicia:
At this point, I am not sure what this means for us, but hopefully clarification will be forthcoming.
As a follow up to our conversation of yesterday, attached for your information is an EPA memo from Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Administrator, to the Regional Administrators, informing them that the 316(b) rule should be considered suspended. At this point, I am not sure what this means for us, but hopefully clarification will be forthcoming.
Jay CC: "Bethay, Stephen" <SBethay@entergy.com>, "Mogolesko, Fred"<fmogole@entergy.com>, "Ford, Bryan" <BFord@entergy.com>
Jay CC:               "Bethay, Stephen" <SBethay@entergy.com>, "Mogolesko, Fred"
I c:\temp\GW)00006.TMP Page 1 I c:~temp~(~VV1UUOU~.TMP Page 1 I Mail Envelope Properties (46018550.338:
              <fmogole@entergy.com>, "Ford, Bryan" <BFord@entergy.com>
11 : 21304)
 
I c:\temp\GW)00006.TMP                                                                               Page I c:~temp~(~VV1UUOU~.TMP                                                                             Page 11 I Mail Envelope Properties       (46018550.338: 11 : 21304)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Creation Date From: Created By: EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM"Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff(@entergy.com>
EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Creation Date            03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM From:                    "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff(@entergy.com>
JScheff(,entergM.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 ARWI (Alicia Williamson) entergy.corn BFord CC (Bryan Ford)finogole CC (Fred Mogolesko)
Created By:              JScheff(,entergM.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 ARWI (Alicia Williamson) entergy.corn BFord CC (Bryan Ford) finogole CC (Fred Mogolesko)
SBethay CC (Stephen Bethay)Post Office TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 Files Size MESSAGE 373 TEXT.htm , 2436 image00l .gif 862 EPA suspends 316b Phase II Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf Mime.822 107840 Route nrc.gov entergy.comr Date & Time 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM 73253 Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested:
SBethay CC (Stephen Bethay)
Return Notification:
Post Office                                                               Route TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01                                                       nrc.gov entergy.comr Files                             Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                         373                 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM TEXT.htm ,                       2436 image00l .gif                   862 EPA suspends 316b Phase II Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf       73253 Mime.822                         107840 Options Expiration Date:                 None Priority:                       Standard ReplyRequested:                 No Return Notification:             None Concealed  
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Security: None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User I Alicia Williamson  
No Security:                       Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User
-EPA suspends 316b Phase 11 Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf]Page I I L~iciW, ,sn- P sspns,1b hse- Ru...e 20Mr0. ae1i rm UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 204602 0 iA&MEMORANDUM OWFT OF  
 
                                                                                                                                                      ]
I Alicia Williamson - EPA suspends 316b Phase 11Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf                                                                           Page I I L~iciW,,sn-           P sspns,1b                 hse-       Ru...e 20Mr0.                                                                 ae1i rm                   UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 P,,u*r&#xb6;2  0     iA&
MEMORANDUM                                                                                             OWFT OF


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Implementation of the Decision in Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA, Remanding the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase 11Regul ion 0 FROM: Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Admini TO: Regional Administrators The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on the status of the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase II regulation under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act ("Phase II rule" or "Rule"). The Phase 11 rule set national standards for cooling water withdrawals by large, existing power producing facilities  
Implementation of the Decision in Riverkeeper,Inc. v. EPA, Remanding the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase 11Regul ion                     0 FROM:               Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Admini TO:                 Regional Administrators The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on the status of the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase II regulation under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act ("Phase II rule" or "Rule"). The Phase 11 rule set national standards for cooling water withdrawals by large, existing power producing facilities ("Phase II facilities"). See 40 C.F.R. Part 125 Subpart J; 69 Fed. Reg. 41576 (July 6, 2004).The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the litigation over the Phase 11 regulation. SE Riverkeeper. Inc., v. EPA, No. 04-6692, (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2007).
("Phase II facilities").
The court's decision remanded several provisions ofthe Rule on various grounds.
See 40 C.F.R. Part 125 Subpart J; 69 Fed. Reg. 41576 (July 6, 2004).The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the litigation over the Phase 11 regulation.
The provisions remanded include:
SE Riverkeeper.
                                  "   EPA's determination of the Best Technology Available under section 316(b);
Inc., v. EPA, No. 04-6692, (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2007).The court's decision remanded several provisions ofthe Rule on various grounds.The provisions remanded include: " EPA's determination of the Best Technology Available under section 316(b);" The Rule's performance standard ranges;" The cost-cost and cost-benefit compliance alternatives;" The Technology Installation and Operation Plan provision;
                                  "   The Rule's performance standard ranges;
* The restoration provisions; and" The "independent supplier" provision.
                                  "   The cost-cost and cost-benefit compliance alternatives;
With so many provisions of the Phase II rule affected by the decision, the rule should be considered suspended.
                                  "   The Technology Installation and Operation Plan provision;
I anticipate issuing a Federal Register notice formally suspending the Rule in the near future.' In the meantime, all permits for Phase I1 facilities should include conditions under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act developed on a Best Professional Judgment basis. See 40 C.F.R. &sect; 401.14.If you have questions regarding the application of section 316(b) at Phase 11 facilities, please contact either Janet Goodwin with the Office ofScience and Technology at 202-566-1060 or Deborah Nagle with the Office of Wastewater Management at 202-564-I 185 (nagle.deborah(iiepa.gov  
* The restoration provisions; and
.1 In.the event that the court's decision is overturned prior to publication of the Federal Register notice. then I will nol proceed to effect the suspension; if'the court's decision is overturned after publication of the notice, the Agency will take appropriate action in response.kWemall Address (URL) 0 ttlpJwWw.sa.gov Nteacled~ecycbl~oe 0 Prined with Vegetable Oil Based lrfton 100% Poslcorisumer, Proces~s Ohlonre Free Recycled Paper}}
                                  "   The "independent supplier" provision.
With so many provisions of the Phase II rule affected by the decision, the rule should be considered suspended. I anticipate issuing a Federal Register notice formally suspending the Rule in the near future.' In the meantime, all permits for Phase I1 facilities should include conditions under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act developed on a Best Professional Judgment basis. See 40 C.F.R. &sect; 401.14.
If you have questions regarding the application of section 316(b) at Phase 11 facilities, please contact either Janet Goodwin with the Office ofScience and Technology at 202-566-1060 (goodwin.ianet*,,epa.nov) or Deborah Nagle with the Office of Wastewater Management at 202-564-I 185 (nagle.deborah(iiepa.gov .
1 In.the event that the court's decision is overturned prior to publication of the Federal Register notice. then I will nol proceed to effect the suspension; if'the court's decision is overturned after publication of the notice, the Agency will take appropriate action in response.
kWemall Address(URL) 0 ttlpJwWw.sa.gov Nteacled~ecycbl~oe 0 Prined withVegetable OilBasedlrfton 100%Poslcorisumer, Proces~s Ohlonre FreeRecycledPaper}}

Latest revision as of 07:27, 23 November 2019

E-MAIL: (PA) EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule
ML071020505
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 03/21/2007
From: Scheffer J
Entergy Corp
To: Williamson A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC MD3698
Download: ML071020505 (3)
v • d • e


Text

I Alicia Williamson - EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Page I11 From: "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff@entergy.com>

To: <arwl @nrc.gov>

Date: 03/21/2007 3:19:50 PM

Subject:

EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Alicia:

As a follow up to our conversation of yesterday, attached for your information is an EPA memo from Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Administrator, to the Regional Administrators, informing them that the 316(b) rule should be considered suspended. At this point, I am not sure what this means for us, but hopefully clarification will be forthcoming.

Jay CC: "Bethay, Stephen" <SBethay@entergy.com>, "Mogolesko, Fred"

<fmogole@entergy.com>, "Ford, Bryan" <BFord@entergy.com>

I c:\temp\GW)00006.TMP Page I c:~temp~(~VV1UUOU~.TMP Page 11 I Mail Envelope Properties (46018550.338: 11 : 21304)

Subject:

EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Creation Date 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM From: "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff(@entergy.com>

Created By: JScheff(,entergM.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 ARWI (Alicia Williamson) entergy.corn BFord CC (Bryan Ford) finogole CC (Fred Mogolesko)

SBethay CC (Stephen Bethay)

Post Office Route TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov entergy.comr Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 373 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM TEXT.htm , 2436 image00l .gif 862 EPA suspends 316b Phase II Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf 73253 Mime.822 107840 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User

]

I Alicia Williamson - EPA suspends 316b Phase 11Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf Page I I L~iciW,,sn- P sspns,1b hse- Ru...e 20Mr0. ae1i rm UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 P,,u*r¶2 0 iA&

MEMORANDUM OWFT OF

SUBJECT:

Implementation of the Decision in Riverkeeper,Inc. v. EPA, Remanding the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase 11Regul ion 0 FROM: Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Admini TO: Regional Administrators The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on the status of the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase II regulation under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act ("Phase II rule" or "Rule"). The Phase 11 rule set national standards for cooling water withdrawals by large, existing power producing facilities ("Phase II facilities"). See 40 C.F.R. Part 125 Subpart J; 69 Fed. Reg. 41576 (July 6, 2004).The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the litigation over the Phase 11 regulation. SE Riverkeeper. Inc., v. EPA, No. 04-6692, (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2007).

The court's decision remanded several provisions ofthe Rule on various grounds.

The provisions remanded include:

" EPA's determination of the Best Technology Available under section 316(b);

" The Rule's performance standard ranges;

" The cost-cost and cost-benefit compliance alternatives;

" The Technology Installation and Operation Plan provision;

  • The restoration provisions; and

" The "independent supplier" provision.

With so many provisions of the Phase II rule affected by the decision, the rule should be considered suspended. I anticipate issuing a Federal Register notice formally suspending the Rule in the near future.' In the meantime, all permits for Phase I1 facilities should include conditions under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act developed on a Best Professional Judgment basis. See 40 C.F.R. § 401.14.

If you have questions regarding the application of section 316(b) at Phase 11 facilities, please contact either Janet Goodwin with the Office ofScience and Technology at 202-566-1060 (goodwin.ianet*,,epa.nov) or Deborah Nagle with the Office of Wastewater Management at 202-564-I 185 (nagle.deborah(iiepa.gov .

1 In.the event that the court's decision is overturned prior to publication of the Federal Register notice. then I will nol proceed to effect the suspension; if'the court's decision is overturned after publication of the notice, the Agency will take appropriate action in response.

kWemall Address(URL) 0 ttlpJwWw.sa.gov Nteacled~ecycbl~oe 0 Prined withVegetable OilBasedlrfton 100%Poslcorisumer, Proces~s Ohlonre FreeRecycledPaper

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML071020505&oldid=2178756"