ML11105A037: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 05/04/2011 | | issue date = 05/04/2011 | ||
| title = Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on March 25, 2011, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Concerning Findings on the Hope Creek Generating Station Gas Turbine | | title = Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on March 25, 2011, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Concerning Findings on the Hope Creek Generating Station Gas Turbine | ||
| author name = Brady B | | author name = Brady B | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR/RPB1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR/RPB1 | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000354 | | docket = 05000354 | ||
| license number = NPF-057 | | license number = NPF-057 | ||
| contact person = Brady B | | contact person = Brady B | ||
| document type = Meeting Summary, Memoranda | | document type = Meeting Summary, Memoranda | ||
| page count = 6 | | page count = 6 | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:... | {{#Wiki_filter:...~",l\ REG u<<, UNITED STATES | ||
REG u<<, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ",~'§"' )<o~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
~ ('> WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 | |||
< 0 Ii> : | |||
~ ~ May 4, 2011 | |||
'l"/; ~ | |||
"'" ..,.0 | |||
****~ | |||
LICENSEE: PSEG Nuclear, LLC FACILITY: Hope Creek Generating Station | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TURBINE The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC, and Exelon held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, on whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, was required to be in the scope of license renewal. Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a brief summary of the discussion and status of the item. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. Bennett M. Brady, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-354 | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TURBINE The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC, and Exelon held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, on whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, was required to be in the scope of license renewal. | ||
Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a brief summary of the discussion and status of the item. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. | |||
~~ | |||
Bennett M. Brady, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-354 | |||
==Enclosures:== | ==Enclosures:== | ||
: 1. List of Participants | : 1. List of Participants | ||
: 2. Summary of meeting discussion cc w/encls: Listserv TELEPHONE CONFERENCE HOPE CREEK GENERATING LICENSE RENEWAL LIST OF MARCH 25, PARTICIPANTS Bennett Brady Rick Ennis Ed Smith Duc Nguyen Cliff Doutt Bo Pham John Hufnagel John Hilditch AI Fulvio Albert Piha Kevin Muggleston Ali Fakhar | : 2. Summary of meeting discussion cc w/encls: Listserv | ||
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS MARCH 25, 2011 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Bennett Brady U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | |||
Rick Ennis NRC Ed Smith NRC Duc Nguyen NRC Cliff Doutt NRC Bo Pham NRC John Hufnagel Exelon John Hilditch Exelon AI Fulvio Exelon Albert Piha Exelon Kevin Muggleston Exelon Ali Fakhar PSEG Nuclear (PSEG) | |||
Paul Duke PSEG ENCLOSURE 1 | |||
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF DISCUSSION March 25, 2011 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, to discuss whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, should be in the scope of license renewal. Hope Creek Generating Station (Hope Creek) has recently submitted a license amendment request (LAR H1 0-03) to the NRC concerning changing the Tech Specs for the A and B emergency diesel generators (EDGs) to allow a 14-day allowable outage time (AOT). Previously the AOT was 72 hours. On February 14, 2011, in letter LR-N 11-0045, PSEG proposed to include the gas turbine generator (aka Salem Unit 3) in the EDG Tech Specs as part of the defense in depth for the 14-day AOT. The gas turbine had not been scoped as part of license renewal for Hope Creek. In addition, it is not mentioned in the Hope Creek license renewal application or safety evaluation report. The question was whether, if the NRC approves LAR H1 0-03, the gas turbine generator should be in the scope of license renewal. The staff noted that the gas turbine did not appear to be in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) as it was not safety-related. | OF DISCUSSION March 25, 2011 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, to discuss whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, should be in the scope of license renewal. | ||
It was also not in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3) as it was not required to perform a function that demonstrates compliance with the Commission's regulations for station blackout. | Hope Creek Generating Station (Hope Creek) has recently submitted a license amendment request (LAR H1 0-03) to the NRC concerning changing the Tech Specs for the A and B emergency diesel generators (EDGs) to allow a 14-day allowable outage time (AOT). | ||
The staff asked for a discussion of whether the gas turbine was a non-safety related component whose failure could prevent the satisfactory function of the EDG during the 14-day AOT and thus be in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2). | Previously the AOT was 72 hours. On February 14, 2011, in letter LR-N 11-0045, PSEG proposed to include the gas turbine generator (aka Salem Unit 3) in the EDG Tech Specs as part of the defense in depth for the 14-day AOT. | ||
During the discussion, it was noted that the gas turbine was not required for the station blackout rule or any other regulation not a part of the plant design basis normally credited in the Hope Creek probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) but not risk-significant and not credited in the Hope Creek PRA for the extended EDG AOT During plant operations, any three of Hope Creek's four EDGs is capable of mitigating the consequences of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) concurrent with a loss-of-coolant accident or LOOP event while operating at full power. In an extended hot or cold shutdown condition, only two EDGs are required. | The gas turbine had not been scoped as part of license renewal for Hope Creek. In addition, it is not mentioned in the Hope Creek license renewal application or safety evaluation report. The question was whether, if the NRC approves LAR H1 0-03, the gas turbine generator should be in the scope of license renewal. | ||
The gas turbine was required in the amendment as a defense in depth measure to provide an alternative means of accomplishing the safety functions provided by the EDGs during the 14-day AOT. ENCLOSURE 2 | The staff noted that the gas turbine did not appear to be in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) as it was not safety-related. It was also not in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3) as it was not required to perform a function that demonstrates compliance with the Commission's regulations for station blackout. The staff asked for a discussion of whether the gas turbine was a non-safety related component whose failure could prevent the satisfactory function of the EDG during the 14-day AOT and thus be in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2). | ||
-2 The staff considered the information provided during the discussion and later informed the applicant that for extended EDG AOTs, the gas turbine, Salem 3, was not within the scope of license renewal because it is considered a temporary component as part of a compensatory measure and is non-safety related. | During the discussion, it was noted that the gas turbine was | ||
May 4,2011 LICENSEE: | * not required for the station blackout rule or any other regulation | ||
PSEG Nuclear, LLC FACILITY: | * not a part of the plant design basis | ||
Hope Creek Generating Station | * normally credited in the Hope Creek probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) but not risk-significant and not credited in the Hope Creek PRA for the extended EDG AOT During plant operations, any three of Hope Creek's four EDGs is capable of mitigating the consequences of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) concurrent with a loss-of-coolant accident or LOOP event while operating at full power. In an extended hot or cold shutdown condition, only two EDGs are required. | ||
The gas turbine was required in the amendment as a defense in depth measure to provide an alternative means of accomplishing the safety functions provided by the EDGs during the 14-day AOT. | |||
ENCLOSURE 2 | |||
-2 The staff considered the information provided during the discussion and later informed the applicant that for extended EDG AOTs, the gas turbine, Salem 3, was not within the scope of license renewal because it is considered a temporary component as part of a compensatory measure and is non-safety related. | |||
May 4,2011 LICENSEE: PSEG Nuclear, LLC FACILITY: Hope Creek Generating Station | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TURBINE The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC, and Exelon held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, on whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, was required to be in the scope of license renewal. | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TURBINE The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC, and Exelon held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, on whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, was required to be in the scope of license renewal. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a brief summary of the discussion and status of the item. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. | ||
IRA! | |||
Bennett M. Brady, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-354 | |||
==Enclosures:== | ==Enclosures:== | ||
: 1. List of Participants | : 1. List of Participants | ||
: 2. Summary of meeting discussion cc w/encls: Listserv DISTRIBUTION: | : 2. Summary of meeting discussion cc w/encls: Listserv DISTRIBUTION: | ||
See next page ADAMS Accession No'.. | See next page ADAMS Accession No'.. ML11105A037 OFFICE LA:DLR I PM:RPB'I :DLR BC:RPB1 :DLR PM:RPB'I :DLR NAME YEdmonds BBrady BPham BBrady DATE 04/20/2011 04/22/2011 05/02/2011 05/04/2011 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy | ||
Memorandum to PSEG Nuclear, LLC from B. Brady dated May 4, 2011 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TUBINE DISTRIBUTION: | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TUBINE DISTRIBUTION: | ||
HARD COPY: DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RdsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource BPham BBrady LPerkins REnnis CSanders BHarris, OGC ABurritt, RI RConte, RI MModes, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI}} | HARD COPY: | ||
DLR RF E-MAIL: | |||
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RdsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource BPham BBrady LPerkins REnnis CSanders BHarris, OGC ABurritt, RI RConte, RI MModes, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI}} |
Latest revision as of 00:54, 13 November 2019
ML11105A037 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Hope Creek |
Issue date: | 05/04/2011 |
From: | Bennett Brady License Renewal Projects Branch 1 |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Brady B | |
References | |
Download: ML11105A037 (6) | |
Text
...~",l\ REG u<<, UNITED STATES
",~'§"' )<o~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~ ('> WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
< 0 Ii> :
~ ~ May 4, 2011
'l"/; ~
"'" ..,.0
- ~
LICENSEE: PSEG Nuclear, LLC FACILITY: Hope Creek Generating Station
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TURBINE The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC, and Exelon held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, on whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, was required to be in the scope of license renewal.
Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a brief summary of the discussion and status of the item. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
~~
Bennett M. Brady, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-354
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Participants
- 2. Summary of meeting discussion cc w/encls: Listserv
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS MARCH 25, 2011 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Bennett Brady U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Rick Ennis NRC Ed Smith NRC Duc Nguyen NRC Cliff Doutt NRC Bo Pham NRC John Hufnagel Exelon John Hilditch Exelon AI Fulvio Exelon Albert Piha Exelon Kevin Muggleston Exelon Ali Fakhar PSEG Nuclear (PSEG)
Paul Duke PSEG ENCLOSURE 1
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION
SUMMARY
OF DISCUSSION March 25, 2011 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, to discuss whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, should be in the scope of license renewal.
Hope Creek Generating Station (Hope Creek) has recently submitted a license amendment request (LAR H1 0-03) to the NRC concerning changing the Tech Specs for the A and B emergency diesel generators (EDGs) to allow a 14-day allowable outage time (AOT).
Previously the AOT was 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. On February 14, 2011, in letter LR-N 11-0045, PSEG proposed to include the gas turbine generator (aka Salem Unit 3) in the EDG Tech Specs as part of the defense in depth for the 14-day AOT.
The gas turbine had not been scoped as part of license renewal for Hope Creek. In addition, it is not mentioned in the Hope Creek license renewal application or safety evaluation report. The question was whether, if the NRC approves LAR H1 0-03, the gas turbine generator should be in the scope of license renewal.
The staff noted that the gas turbine did not appear to be in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) as it was not safety-related. It was also not in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3) as it was not required to perform a function that demonstrates compliance with the Commission's regulations for station blackout. The staff asked for a discussion of whether the gas turbine was a non-safety related component whose failure could prevent the satisfactory function of the EDG during the 14-day AOT and thus be in the scope of license renewal by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
During the discussion, it was noted that the gas turbine was
- not required for the station blackout rule or any other regulation
- not a part of the plant design basis
- normally credited in the Hope Creek probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) but not risk-significant and not credited in the Hope Creek PRA for the extended EDG AOT During plant operations, any three of Hope Creek's four EDGs is capable of mitigating the consequences of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) concurrent with a loss-of-coolant accident or LOOP event while operating at full power. In an extended hot or cold shutdown condition, only two EDGs are required.
The gas turbine was required in the amendment as a defense in depth measure to provide an alternative means of accomplishing the safety functions provided by the EDGs during the 14-day AOT.
ENCLOSURE 2
-2 The staff considered the information provided during the discussion and later informed the applicant that for extended EDG AOTs, the gas turbine, Salem 3, was not within the scope of license renewal because it is considered a temporary component as part of a compensatory measure and is non-safety related.
May 4,2011 LICENSEE: PSEG Nuclear, LLC FACILITY: Hope Creek Generating Station
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TURBINE The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC, and Exelon held a telephone conference call on March 25, 2011, on whether a gas turbine, known as Salem 3, was required to be in the scope of license renewal. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a brief summary of the discussion and status of the item. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
IRA!
Bennett M. Brady, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-354
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Participants
- 2. Summary of meeting discussion cc w/encls: Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
See next page ADAMS Accession No'.. ML11105A037 OFFICE LA:DLR I PM:RPB'I :DLR BC:RPB1 :DLR PM:RPB'I :DLR NAME YEdmonds BBrady BPham BBrady DATE 04/20/2011 04/22/2011 05/02/2011 05/04/2011 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy
Memorandum to PSEG Nuclear, LLC from B. Brady dated May 4, 2011
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON MARCH 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING FINDINGS ON THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION GAS TUBINE DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
DLR RF E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RdsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource BPham BBrady LPerkins REnnis CSanders BHarris, OGC ABurritt, RI RConte, RI MModes, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI